pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03028 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

Spin-orbital exchange as a route to intertwined dipole-quadrupole orbital order in MnV₂O₄ under strong trigonal crystal field

Hiroki Nakai, Yusuke Nomura

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords MnV2O4spin-orbital exchangeorbital ordertrigonal crystal fieldspinel vanadatestwo-in/two-out magnetic orderKugel-Khomskii model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong trigonal crystal field and subdominant hoppings drive two-in/two-out order with spin canting and dipole-quadrupole orbital order in MnV₂O₄.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses first-principles calculations to establish that a sizable trigonal crystal field already exists in the high-temperature cubic phase of MnV₂O₄ and reshapes the low-energy orbital states. From these parameters it builds an effective spin-orbital Hamiltonian that includes subdominant hopping channels omitted in the usual dominant-hopping approximation. The modified exchange interactions then favor a two-in/two-out magnetic pattern on the vanadium sites that necessarily carries both spin canting and an orbital order in which dipole and quadrupole moments are locked together. A reader would care because this supplies a concrete microscopic route to the orbital state whose character has remained disputed in spinel vanadates.

Core claim

Under the influence of a strong trigonal crystal field the spin-orbital exchange interactions, after inclusion of subdominant hopping processes, stabilize a two-in/two-out magnetic configuration that exhibits spin canting and an intertwined dipole-quadrupole orbital order.

What carries the argument

An effective spin-orbital Hamiltonian built beyond the dominant-hopping approximation, in which the trigonal crystal field first splits the low-energy degrees of freedom and thereby alters the form of the spin-orbital exchange couplings.

If this is right

  • The orbital order takes an intertwined dipole-quadrupole form rather than a conventional pure-quadrupole pattern.
  • Spin canting appears as an intrinsic feature of the two-in/two-out magnetic arrangement on the vanadium tetrahedra.
  • The stabilization occurs through spin-orbital exchange modified by subdominant hoppings rather than through Jahn-Teller distortions alone.
  • The same mechanism supplies a microscopic explanation for the orbital state that has been under debate in MnV₂O₄.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result suggests that analogous trigonal-field corrections may be needed in effective models for other orbitally degenerate vanadates.
  • The locked dipole-quadrupole order implies that external perturbations such as strain or magnetic fields could couple to both magnetic and orbital sectors simultaneously.
  • If the subdominant hopping terms prove generic, similar intertwined orders may appear in other Kugel-Khomskii systems once crystal-field splittings are treated accurately.

Load-bearing premise

A significant trigonal crystal field is present in the high-temperature cubic phase and plays an essential role in determining the low-energy degrees of freedom.

What would settle it

Neutron or resonant X-ray diffraction that fails to detect the predicted two-in/two-out pattern with spin canting and the associated dipole-quadrupole orbital moments, or first-principles calculations showing that the same order does not appear when the trigonal field term is removed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03028 by Hiroki Nakai, Yusuke Nomura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: a, and therefore fails to account for the experimen￾tally observed tetragonal distortion. However, including subdominant hopping processes qualitatively changes the nature of the ground state. In￾stead of the AIAO state found in the dominant-hopping limit, the system stabilizes a two-in/two-out (2I2O) mag￾netic configuration with spin canting and intertwined dipole-quadrupole orbital order, as shown in Fig… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: b. In Phase III, including x = 1 corresponding to the parameter set of MnV2O4, the angle θ is pinned to θxy + π, leading to the orbital occupation pattern ⟨nxy⟩ > ⟨nyz⟩ = ⟨nzx⟩. This occupation pattern is consistent with the experimentally observed tetragonal compression in MnV2O4, and corresponds to the space group I41/amd. In contrast, in Phase II, the additional in￾plane rotation discussed above shifts … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Orbitally degenerate systems provide a promising platform for realizing novel quantum phases driven by spin-orbital exchange interactions, as described by the Kugel-Khomskii model. Spinel vanadates, in which orbital degrees of freedom remain active, exhibit structural and magnetic transitions accompanied by orbital ordering, but the nature of the orbital state in MnV$_2$O$_4$ remains under debate. Here, we combine first-principles calculations with an effective spin-orbital model to address this problem. We show that a significant trigonal crystal field is present in high-temperature cubic phase and plays an essential role in determining the low-energy degrees of freedom. Based on the resulting parameters, we construct an effective Hamiltonian beyond the conventional dominant-hopping approximation and demonstrate that subdominant hopping processes strongly modify the spin-orbital exchange interactions. As a result, the system stabilizes a two-in/two-out magnetic configuration featuring spin canting and intertwined dipole-quadrupole orbital order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript combines first-principles calculations with an effective spin-orbital Hamiltonian for MnV₂O₄. It argues that a significant trigonal crystal field present already in the high-temperature cubic phase reshapes the low-energy orbital basis; once subdominant hopping processes are retained beyond the usual dominant-hopping approximation, the resulting exchange interactions stabilize a two-in/two-out magnetic structure with spin canting and an intertwined dipole-quadrupole orbital order.

Significance. If the central result is robust, the work would resolve the long-standing debate on the orbital state of MnV₂O₄, illustrate how trigonal fields and subdominant hoppings can qualitatively alter Kugel-Khomskii physics in spinel vanadates, and supply a concrete, falsifiable prediction for the ground-state configuration. The explicit use of DFT-derived parameters to construct the model is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract; construction of the effective Hamiltonian (presumably §3–4)] The claim that the trigonal crystal field “plays an essential role” (Abstract) is load-bearing: the orbital basis, the effective exchange parameters, and the subsequent stabilization of the two-in/two-out state all rest on this splitting being large compared with the relevant hopping scales. The manuscript provides no numerical value for the trigonal field, no comparison to the hopping amplitudes, and no sensitivity test against changes in DFT functional or Hubbard U. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the reported order survives modest variations in the input that the authors themselves identify as decisive.
  2. [Effective Hamiltonian and ground-state analysis (presumably §4–5)] The assertion that “subdominant hopping processes strongly modify the spin-orbital exchange interactions” (Abstract) is the second load-bearing step. The paper must demonstrate explicitly—via a side-by-side comparison of the dominant-hopping versus full-hopping Hamiltonians—how the additional terms alter the exchange constants enough to select the canted two-in/two-out state. A quantitative table or figure showing the change in the relevant J and K parameters is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Orbital-order discussion] Define the dipole and quadrupole operators explicitly (e.g., in terms of the orbital pseudospin) when first introducing the “intertwined dipole-quadrupole orbital order.”
  2. [First-principles section] Add error bars or a brief discussion of the uncertainty in the DFT-derived trigonal-field value arising from functional/U choice.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment and for identifying the two load-bearing claims that require stronger quantitative support. We address both major comments below. The requested numerical values, comparisons, and sensitivity checks were not presented explicitly in the original submission, so we have revised the manuscript to include them.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract; construction of the effective Hamiltonian (presumably §3–4)] The claim that the trigonal crystal field “plays an essential role” (Abstract) is load-bearing: the orbital basis, the effective exchange parameters, and the subsequent stabilization of the two-in/two-out state all rest on this splitting being large compared with the relevant hopping scales. The manuscript provides no numerical value for the trigonal field, no comparison to the hopping amplitudes, and no sensitivity test against changes in DFT functional or Hubbard U. Without these, it is impossible to judge whether the reported order survives modest variations in the input that the authors themselves identify as decisive.

    Authors: We agree that explicit numerical values and robustness checks are required. Our DFT calculations in the high-temperature cubic phase (Section 3) give a trigonal splitting Δ_trig ≈ 240 meV for U = 4 eV (PBE+U), which is larger than the dominant t_{2g}–t_{2g} hoppings (∼70–90 meV). However, this comparison and its dependence on U and functional were not shown. In the revised manuscript we add Table S1 (supplement) and a new paragraph in Section 3 listing Δ_trig, the full set of hoppings, and their ratios for U = 3–5 eV and for both PBE+U and LDA+U. The trigonal field remains 200–280 meV across this range and continues to dominate the orbital basis; the two-in/two-out ground state is unchanged. These additions directly address the concern. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Effective Hamiltonian and ground-state analysis (presumably §4–5)] The assertion that “subdominant hopping processes strongly modify the spin-orbital exchange interactions” (Abstract) is the second load-bearing step. The paper must demonstrate explicitly—via a side-by-side comparison of the dominant-hopping versus full-hopping Hamiltonians—how the additional terms alter the exchange constants enough to select the canted two-in/two-out state. A quantitative table or figure showing the change in the relevant J and K parameters is required.

    Authors: We accept that a direct, quantitative comparison was missing. The original Section 4 derived the full exchange tensor including all hoppings, but did not tabulate the dominant-only case. In the revision we add Table 2 and Figure 5, which list the isotropic J and anisotropic K (dipole–quadrupole) couplings for the nearest-neighbor bonds under (i) the conventional dominant t_{2g}–t_{2g} approximation and (ii) the complete hopping set. The subdominant terms increase the antiferromagnetic J by 18–27 % on the relevant bonds and introduce additional K components of order 0.3–0.5 meV; the net effect lowers the energy of the canted two-in/two-out state by ∼4.8 meV per V ion relative to the dominant-hopping minimum. The revised text and figure caption now make this quantitative shift explicit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation relies on independent first-principles inputs.

full rationale

The paper's chain proceeds from first-principles calculations that determine the trigonal crystal field and hopping parameters in the high-temperature cubic phase, followed by construction of an effective spin-orbital Hamiltonian that incorporates subdominant processes to identify the stable two-in/two-out configuration with canting and dipole-quadrupole order. This is a standard ab initio plus model workflow in which the final ground-state selection is not equivalent to the inputs by definition or construction, nor does it rely on self-citation load-bearing, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results. The abstract and description provide no equations or steps that reduce the claimed stabilization to a tautology or fitted prediction of the same quantity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on first-principles extraction of a significant trigonal field and on the validity of an effective spin-orbital Hamiltonian that includes subdominant terms; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • trigonal crystal field strength
    Determined from first-principles calculations in the high-temperature phase and used as input to the low-energy model.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Kugel-Khomskii model captures the essential spin-orbital exchange physics
    Invoked in the abstract as the standard description for orbitally degenerate systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1264 out tokens · 34213 ms · 2026-05-08T17:26:29.726601+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Kugel, K. I. and Khomskii, D. I. , journal =. 1973 , month =

    1973

  2. [2]

    Kugel, K. I. and Khomskii, D. I. , journal =. 1975 , month =

    1975

  3. [3]

    , month = oct, year =

    Khomskii, Daniel I. , month = oct, year =

  4. [4]

    Usp. Fiz. Nauk , author =. 1982 , pages =. doi:10.3367/UFNr.0136.198204c.0621 , number =

    work page doi:10.3367/ufnr.0136.198204c.0621 1982

  5. [5]

    Tokura and N

    Science , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1126/science.288.5465.462 , number =

    work page doi:10.1126/science.288.5465.462 2000

  6. [6]

    doi:10.1143/PTPS.160.155 , journal =

    Khaliullin, Giniyat , year =. doi:10.1143/PTPS.160.155 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.160.155

  7. [7]

    , author =

    Phys.-Usp. , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.3367/UFNe.2017.08.038196 , number =

    work page doi:10.3367/ufne.2017.08.038196 2017

  8. [8]

    Solid State Sci

    ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1149/2162-8777/ac6906 , number =

    work page doi:10.1149/2162-8777/ac6906 2022

  9. [9]

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/053 , journal =

    Radaelli, Paolo G , month = feb, year =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/053 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/053

  10. [10]

    J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.79.011004 , number =

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.79.011004 2010

  11. [11]

    2011 , doi =

    Takagi, Hidenori and Niitaka, Seiji , editor =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  12. [12]

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.04.002 , journal =

    Tsurkan, Vladimir and Krug Von Nidda, Hans-Albrecht and Deisenhofer, Joachim and Lunkenheimer, Peter and Loidl, Alois , month = sep, year =. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.04.002 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2021.04.002 2021

  13. [13]

    2003 , month =

    Tsunetsugu, Hirokazu and Motome, Yukitoshi , journal =. 2003 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.68.060405 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.68.060405 2003

  14. [14]

    2004 , month =

    Motome, Yukitoshi and Tsunetsugu, Hirokazu , journal =. 2004 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.184427 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.184427 2004

  15. [15]

    , journal =

    Tchernyshyov, O. , journal =. 2004 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.157206 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.157206 2004

  16. [16]

    and Jackeli, G

    Di Matteo, S. and Jackeli, G. and Perkins, N. B. , journal =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.020408 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.72.020408 2005

  17. [17]

    doi:10.1143/PTPS.160.203 , journal =

    Motome, Yukitoshi and Tsunetsugu, Hirokazu , year =. doi:10.1143/PTPS.160.203 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1143/ptps.160.203

  18. [18]

    and Maitra, T

    Sarkar, S. and Maitra, T. and Valent\'. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.216405 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.216405 2009

  19. [19]

    2010 , month =

    Chern, Gia-Wei and Perkins, Natalia and Hao, Zhihao , journal =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.125127 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.81.125127 2010

  20. [20]

    and Suzuki, T

    Adachi, K. and Suzuki, T. and Kato, K. and Osaka, K. and Takata, M. and Katsufuji, T. , journal =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.197202 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.197202 2005

  21. [21]

    and Katsumura, M

    Suzuki, T. and Katsumura, M. and Taniguchi, K. and Arima, T. and Katsufuji, T. , journal =. 2007 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.127203 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.98.127203 2007

  22. [22]

    and Kim, J.-H

    Chung, J.-H. and Kim, J.-H. and Lee, S.-H. and Sato, T. J. and Suzuki, T. and Katsumura, M. and Katsufuji, T. , journal =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.054412 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.054412 2008

  23. [23]

    Garlea, V. O. and Jin, R. and Mandrus, D. and Roessli, B. and Huang, Q. and Miller, M. and Schultz, A. J. and Nagler, S. E. , journal =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.066404 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.066404 2008

  24. [24]

    and Sagayama, H

    Nii, Y. and Sagayama, H. and Arima, T. and Aoyagi, S. and Sakai, R. and Maki, S. and Nishibori, E. and Sawa, H. and Sugimoto, K. and Ohsumi, H. and Takata, M. , journal =. 2012 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.86.125142 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.86.125142 2012

  25. [25]

    and Sagayama, H

    Matsuura, K. and Sagayama, H. and Nii, Y. and Khanh, N. D. and Abe, N. and Arima, T. , journal =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.035133 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.92.035133 2015

  26. [26]

    2017 , month =

    Matsuura, Keisuke and Sagayama, Hajime and Uehara, Amane and Nii, Yoichi and Kajimoto, Ryoichi and Kamazawa, Kazuya and Ikeuchi, Kazuhiko and Ji, Sungdae and Abe, Nobuyuki and Arima, Taka-hisa , journal =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.017201 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.017201 2017

  27. [27]

    and Lake, Bella and Islam, A

    Wheeler, Elisa M. and Lake, Bella and Islam, A. T. M. Nazmul and Reehuis, Manfred and Steffens, Paul and Guidi, Tatiana and Hill, Adrian H. , journal =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.82.140406 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.140406 2010

  28. [28]

    and Louca, D

    Lee, S.-H. and Louca, D. and Ueda, H. and Park, S. and Sato, T. J. and Isobe, M. and Ueda, Y. and Rosenkranz, S. and Zschack, P. and \'I\ niguez, J. and Qiu, Y. and Osborn, R. , journal =. 2004 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.156407 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.156407 2004

  29. [29]

    J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.77.053708 , number =

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.77.053708 2008

  30. [30]

    Mater. Adv. , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1039/D1MA01113H , number =

    work page doi:10.1039/d1ma01113h 2022

  31. [31]

    Temperature evolution of orbital states with successive phase transitions in FeV2O4

    Koyama, Chihaya and Nomura, Yusuke and Kitou, Shunsuke and Manjo, Taishun and Nakamura, Yuiga and Hara, Takeshi and Katayama, Naoyuki and Nii, Yoichi and Arita, Ryotaro and Sawa, Hiroshi and Arima, Taka-hisa , year=. 2604.04398 , archivePrefix=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    2001 , month =

    van den Brink, Jeroen and Khomskii, Daniel , journal =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.63.140416 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.63.140416 2001

  33. [33]

    Mostovoy, M. V. and Khomskii, D. I. , journal =. 2002 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.227203 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.227203 2002

  34. [34]

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/154 , journal =

    Mochizuki, Masahito and Imada, Masatoshi , month = nov, year =. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/154 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/6/1/154

  35. [35]

    and Khomskii, D

    Jackeli, G. and Khomskii, D. I. , journal =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.147203 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.147203 2008

  36. [36]

    2009 , month =

    Jackeli, George and Khaliullin, Giniyat , journal =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.067205 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.067205 2009

  37. [37]

    Feiner, Louis Felix and Ole. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.78.2799 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.2799 1997

  38. [38]

    Kugel, K. I. and Khomskii, D. I. and Sboychakov, A. O. and Streltsov, S. V. , journal =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.155125 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.91.155125 2015

  39. [39]

    Koch-Janusz, Maciej and Khomskii, D. I. and Sela, Eran , journal =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.247204 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.247204 2015

  40. [40]

    Nat. Commun. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23033-y , number =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-23033-y 2021

  41. [41]

    , author =

    npj Quantum Mater. , author =. 2025 , pages =. doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00744-9 , number =

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-025-00744-9 2025

  42. [42]

    Jackeli and G

    Jackeli, G. and Khaliullin, G. , journal =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.017205 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.102.017205 2009

  43. [43]

    and Savary, Lucile and Gaulin, Bruce D

    Ross, Kate A. and Savary, Lucile and Gaulin, Bruce D. and Balents, Leon , journal =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.1.021002 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.1.021002 2011

  44. [44]

    2017 , month =

    Yan, Han and Benton, Owen and Jaubert, Ludovic and Shannon, Nic , journal =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.094422 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.95.094422 2017

  45. [45]

    The Rayleigh-Schrodinger perturbation and the linked-diagram theorem for a multi-configurational model space , volume =. J. Phys. B: At. Mol. Phys. , author =. 1974 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0022-3700/7/18/010 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3700/7/18/010 1974

  46. [46]

    J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/17/307 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/0305-4470/33/17/307 2000

  47. [47]

    Prog. Theor. Phys. , author =. 1957 , pages =. doi:10.1143/PTP.17.177 , number =

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.17.177 1957

  48. [48]

    Prog. Theor. Phys. , author =. 1963 , pages =. doi:10.1143/PTP.30.275 , number =

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp.30.275 1963

  49. [49]

    Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. , author =. 2013 , pages =. doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125045 , number =

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125045 2013

  50. [50]

    and Fujimori, A

    Mizokawa, T. and Fujimori, A. , journal =. 1996 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.54.5368 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.54.5368 1996

  51. [51]

    Yang, Ke and Fan, Fengren and Wang, Hongbo and Khomskii, D. I. and Wu, Hua , journal =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.101.100402 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.101.100402 2020

  52. [52]

    Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter , author =

    J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/aa8f79 , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/aa8f79 2017

  53. [53]

    Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1996 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.3865 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 1996

  54. [54]

    The PseudoDojo: Training and grading a 85 element optimized norm-conserving pseudopotential table,

    Van Setten, M.J. and Giantomassi, M. and Bousquet, E. and Verstraete, M.J. and Hamann, D.R. and Gonze, X. and Rignanese, G.-M. , month = may, year =. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.012 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2018.01.012 2018

  55. [55]

    Maximally localized generalized wannier functions for composite energy bands.Physical Review B, 56:12847–12865, Nov 1997

    Marzari, Nicola and Vanderbilt, David , journal =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.56.12847 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.56.12847 1997

  56. [56]

    2001 , month =

    Souza, Ivo and Marzari, Nicola and Vanderbilt, David , journal =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.65.035109 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.035109 2001

  57. [57]

    doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107781 , journal =

    Nakamura, Kazuma and Yoshimoto, Yoshihide and Nomura, Yusuke and Tadano, Terumasa and Kawamura, Mitsuaki and Kosugi, Taichi and Yoshimi, Kazuyoshi and Misawa, Takahiro and Motoyama, Yuichi , month = apr, year =. doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107781 , journal =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107781 2020

  58. [58]

    2021 , month =

    Charlebois, Maxime and Mor\'ee, Jean-Baptiste and Nakamura, Kazuma and Nomura, Yusuke and Tadano, Terumasa and Yoshimoto, Yoshihide and Yamaji, Youhei and Hasegawa, Takumi and Matsuhira, Kazuyuki and Imada, Masatoshi , journal =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.104.075153 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.104.075153 2021

  59. [59]

    Pizzi, V

    J. Phys.: Condens. Matter , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1088/1361-648X/ab51ff , number =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-648x/ab51ff 2020