arxiv: 2605.03037 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Generalized Free Fields in de Sitter from 1D CFT

Kanato Goto , Alexey Milekhin , Herman Verlinde , Jiuci Xu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords 1D CFTde Sitter spacegeneralized free fieldsholographySYK modelSchwarzian mechanicsHKLL reconstruction

0 comments

The pith

A pair of identical large-N 1D CFTs contains operators that form a generalized free field algebra on a timelike geodesic in de Sitter spacetime.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that two copies of a large-N one-dimensional conformal field theory share a distinguished sub-algebra whose operators reproduce the algebra and correlators of generalized free fields propagating along a timelike geodesic inside de Sitter space. The mapping rests on large-N factorization, the conformal symmetry of the one-dimensional theories, and the split representation of de Sitter propagators. If the identification is correct, solvable one-dimensional models such as the low-energy SYK theory or line defects in higher-dimensional CFTs furnish explicit microscopic realizations of free fields in an expanding cosmological background. In three-dimensional de Sitter space the same operators extend throughout the bulk and reproduce the standard holographic reconstruction procedure adapted to de Sitter. The construction appears automatically inside a covariant version of Schwarzian quantum mechanics, offering a possible microscopic model for de Sitter gravity.

Core claim

We show that a pair of identical large N 1D CFTs, like the low-energy limit of the SYK model or a line-defect inside a higher dimensional CFT, contains a natural sub-algebra of operators that comprise a generalized free field algebra living on a time-like geodesic in d+1-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The construction uses large N factorization, 1D conformal symmetry, and the split representation of de Sitter Green functions. We show that for 3D de Sitter spacetime, the holographic map extends into the bulk and reduces to the standard HKLL prescription adjusted to de Sitter spacetime. We describe how our construction is automatically implemented in a covariant version of Schwarzian quantum

What carries the argument

The sub-algebra of operators identified inside the pair of 1D CFTs by means of the split representation of de Sitter Green functions, which realizes the generalized free field algebra on the timelike geodesic.

If this is right

The identified operators satisfy the commutation relations and two-point functions of free fields in de Sitter geometry.
In three-dimensional de Sitter space the sub-algebra reconstructs bulk fields according to an adjusted HKLL prescription.
The same sub-algebra emerges automatically inside covariant Schwarzian quantum mechanics.
The construction supplies a concrete realization of the de Sitter/DSSYK correspondence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Numerical studies of the SYK model could directly test whether the extracted sub-algebra reproduces de Sitter correlators.
The same factorization technique may extend to weakly interacting fields once the free-field limit is relaxed.
Similar sub-algebra constructions could link one-dimensional models to other cosmological or expanding backgrounds.

Load-bearing premise

Large-N factorization must continue to hold exactly when the operators are restricted to the identified sub-algebra, and the split representation must correctly translate those operators into fields on the de Sitter geodesic.

What would settle it

A computation of the leading large-N four-point function among the sub-algebra operators that deviates from the expected de Sitter generalized free field correlator would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

We show that a pair of identical large $N$ 1D CFTs, like the low-energy limit of the SYK model or a line-defect inside a higher dimensional CFT, contains a natural sub-algebra of operators that comprise a generalized free field algebra living on a time-like geodesic in d+1-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The construction uses large $N$ factorization, 1D conformal symmetry, and the split representation of de Sitter Green functions. We show that for 3D de Sitter spacetime, the holographic map extends into the bulk and reduces to the standard HKLL prescription adjusted to de Sitter spacetime. We describe how our construction is automatically implemented in a covariant version of Schwarzian quantum mechanics and comment on the relevance of our results to the de Sitter/DSSYK correspondence.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper builds a sub-algebra of generalized free fields on a dS timelike geodesic out of paired large-N 1D CFTs and shows it reduces to adjusted HKLL in 3D.

read the letter

The central result is a concrete identification: take two identical large-N 1D CFTs and extract the operators whose correlators match those of a generalized free field restricted to a timelike geodesic in d+1 de Sitter. The map uses large-N factorization plus the split representation of the dS two-point functions, and the authors verify that the resulting algebra is closed under the OPE in the large-N limit. For three-dimensional de Sitter they recover an adjusted version of the HKLL reconstruction, which is a useful sanity check. They also note that the same structure appears automatically in a covariant Schwarzian quantum mechanics setup, tying it to existing SYK-like models and line-defect constructions. That is the part that feels new and worth having on record. The assumptions are standard—large-N factorization and the split representation—but they are stated clearly and the derivation does not appear to introduce extra fitting or circular steps. The paper stays within formal consistency checks rather than claiming new dynamical predictions, so the scope is modest but the logic holds together. No obvious internal contradictions or missing steps show up in the construction. This is aimed at people working on de Sitter holography who want explicit operator-level maps rather than abstract existence arguments. Readers already comfortable with SYK, Schwarzian mechanics, or holographic reconstruction will get the most out of it. It is worth sending to peer review; the central claim is well-defined, the checks are there, and the reduction to HKLL gives referees something concrete to examine.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript shows that a pair of identical large-N 1D CFTs (e.g., the low-energy SYK model or a line defect in a higher-dimensional CFT) contains a natural sub-algebra of operators that realizes a generalized free field algebra living on a timelike geodesic in (d+1)-dimensional de Sitter spacetime. The construction employs large-N factorization, 1D conformal symmetry, and the split representation of de Sitter Green functions. The authors verify that the resulting two-point functions reproduce the geodesic-restricted dS propagators and demonstrate that, for 3D de Sitter, the holographic map reduces to an adjusted HKLL prescription. The construction is automatically realized in a covariant version of Schwarzian quantum mechanics, with comments on its relevance to the de Sitter/DSSYK correspondence.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the work supplies a concrete, symmetry-based realization of de Sitter holography starting from 1D CFT data, without introducing new parameters beyond the large-N limit. It extends the HKLL reconstruction to de Sitter geometry in a controlled special case and connects directly to SYK-like models, which may aid investigations of the dS/DSSYK correspondence. The use of standard large-N factorization and the split representation, together with the explicit reduction to a known prescription, constitutes a strength; the result is falsifiable via checks of higher-point functions or explicit SYK computations.

major comments (1)

The central claim that the identified sub-algebra is closed and forms a GFF algebra rests on the assumption that large-N factorization applies without modification to the chosen operators. An explicit verification that the four-point function (or higher) factorizes exactly as required for GFFs, rather than inheriting only the two-point structure, would be needed to confirm the algebra is interaction-free; this is load-bearing for the assertion that no additional dynamical assumptions are required.

minor comments (2)

The application of the split representation to the 1D operators is described at a high level; including the explicit integral kernel or a short derivation of how the 1D two-point function maps to the dS geodesic propagator would improve readability.
Notation for the bulk geodesic coordinates and the embedding of the 1D CFT operators could be standardized with a single figure or table summarizing the dictionary.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for their positive evaluation of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim that the identified sub-algebra is closed and forms a GFF algebra rests on the assumption that large-N factorization applies without modification to the chosen operators. An explicit verification that the four-point function (or higher) factorizes exactly as required for GFFs, rather than inheriting only the two-point structure, would be needed to confirm the algebra is interaction-free; this is load-bearing for the assertion that no additional dynamical assumptions are required.

Authors: We thank the referee for this constructive comment. The sub-algebra is constructed from operators in the large-N 1D CFT whose two-point functions are matched to the dS geodesic propagators via the split representation. At leading order in the large-N expansion, the parent CFT satisfies factorization for all correlation functions, so that connected contributions to n-point functions with n>2 are suppressed. The sub-algebra therefore inherits exact factorization at this order, with the only non-vanishing pairings being those dictated by the two-point functions. This automatically yields the Wick contractions required for a GFF algebra. Nevertheless, to make the closure and interaction-free nature fully explicit, we will add a short subsection in the revised manuscript that computes the four-point function of the sub-algebra operators and verifies the factorization into products of two-point functions. This addition addresses the referee's concern without changing the main results or requiring new dynamical assumptions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The central construction defines a sub-algebra of operators in the large-N 1D CFT using the external inputs of large-N factorization and the split representation of de Sitter Green functions. The 2-point functions are then shown to reproduce the geodesic-restricted dS propagator by direct substitution of these inputs, without any parameter fitting or redefinition that would make the output equivalent to the input by construction. The reduction to an adjusted HKLL map in 3D dS is presented as a consistency check on the general map rather than a load-bearing step. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or to close any logical loop in the derivation chain. The result is therefore independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in holography and CFT with no free parameters or new invented entities beyond the sub-algebra itself.

axioms (3)

domain assumption Large N factorization in 1D CFT
Invoked to isolate the sub-algebra of operators.
standard math 1D conformal symmetry matching de Sitter isometries
Used to align the operator algebra with the bulk geometry.
domain assumption Split representation of de Sitter Green functions
Employed to construct the holographic map.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5445 in / 1462 out tokens · 40983 ms · 2026-05-08T17:48:44.118915+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith.Cost.FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

O_Δ(τ) = N ∫ dt O^L_{d/2−Δ}(t) O^R_Δ(τ−t); mass m² = 4Δ(d/2−Δ); two-point function reproduces dS Green function 2F1(2Δ, d−2Δ; (d+1)/2; σ).
IndisputableMonolith.Foundation.AlexanderDuality alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Split representation: G^dS_Δ(X,Y) = 4ν sin(πν) ∫ d^d x' K_Δ(X;x') K_{d/2−Δ}(x',Y); HKLL reconstruction in dS_3 via SL(2,C) matrix elements.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

The dS / CFT correspondence

Andrew Strominger. “The dS / CFT correspondence”. In:JHEP10 (2001), p. 034.doi: 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/10/034. arXiv:hep-th/0106113

work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2001/10/034 2001
[2]

Mangano, M

Tom Banks, Bartomeu Fiol, and Alexander Morisse. “Towards a quantum theory of de Sitter space”. In:JHEP12 (2006), p. 004.doi:10.1088/1126- 6708/2006/12/004. arXiv:hep-th/0609062

work page doi:10.1088/1126- 2006
[3]

Static patch solipsism: conformal symmetry of the de Sitter worldline

Dionysios Anninos, Sean A Hartnoll, and Diego M Hofman. “Static patch solipsism: conformal symmetry of the de Sitter worldline”. In:Classical and Quantum Gravity 29.7 (Mar. 2012), p. 075002.issn: 1361-6382.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/7/075002. url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/29/7/075002

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/29/7/075002 2012
[4]

‘Measurement of the in- clusive and differential WZ production cross sec- tions, polarization angles, and triple gauge coup- lings in pp collisions at √s= 13 TeV’

Evan Coleman, Edward A. Mazenc, Vasudev Shyam, Eva Silverstein, Ronak M. Soni, Gonzalo Torroba, and Sungyeon Yang. “De Sitter microstates fromT T+ Λ 2 and the Hawking-Page transition”. In:JHEP07 (2022), p. 140.doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2022)

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2022 2022
[5]

arXiv:2110.14670 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[6]

Leonard Susskind.De Sitter Space, Double-Scaled SYK, and the Separation of Scales in the Semiclassical Limit. 2022. arXiv:2209.09999 [hep-th].url:https://arxiv. org/abs/2209.09999

work page arXiv 2022
[7]

Vladimir Narovlansky and Herman Verlinde.Double-scaled SYK and de Sitter Hologra- phy. 2023. arXiv:2310.16994 [hep-th].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.16994

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

Revisiting Brownian SYK and its possible relations to de Sitter

Alexey Milekhin and Jiuci Xu. “Revisiting Brownian SYK and its possible relations to de Sitter”. In:JHEP10 (2024), p. 151.doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)151. arXiv: 2312.03623 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2024)151 2024
[9]

Chandrasekaran, R

Venkatesa Chandrasekaran, Roberto Longo, Geoff Penington, and Edward Witten. “An algebra of observables for de Sitter space”. In:JHEP02 (2023), p. 082.doi:10.1007/ JHEP02(2023)082. arXiv:2206.10780 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[10]

A Background Independent Algebra in Quantum Gravity

Edward Witten. “A Background Independent Algebra in Quantum Gravity”. In: (Aug. 2023). arXiv:2308.03663 [hep-th]. 11We used the fact that Γ q(x)/Γ(x) = 1 +O(λ), for anyx∈ O(λ 0). This fails ifx∈ O(λ −1) – 29 –

work page arXiv 2023
[11]

Leutheusser and H

Sam Leutheusser and Hong Liu. “Subregion-subalgebra duality: Emergence of space and time in holography”. In:Phys. Rev. D111.6 (2025), p. 066021.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD.111.066021. arXiv:2212.13266 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[12]

Banks, M

Tom Banks, Michael R. Douglas, Gary T. Horowitz, and Emil Martinec.AdS Dynamics from Conformal Field Theory. 1998. arXiv:hep-th/9808016 [hep-th].url:https: //arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9808016

work page arXiv 1998
[13]

Holographic representation of local bulk operators,

Alex Hamilton, Daniel N. Kabat, Gilad Lifschytz, and David A. Lowe. “Holographic representation of local bulk operators”. In:Phys. Rev. D74 (2006), p. 066009.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.74.066009. arXiv:hep-th/0606141

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.066009 2006
[14]

A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators

Charlotte Sleight. “A Mellin Space Approach to Cosmological Correlators”. In:JHEP 01 (2020), p. 090.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2020)090. arXiv:1906.12302 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2020)090 2020
[15]

Holographic representation of local operators in de sitter space

Xiao Xiao. “Holographic representation of local operators in de sitter space”. In:Phys. Rev. D90.2 (2014), p. 024061.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.024061. arXiv:1402.7080 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.024061 2014
[16]

Maldacena and D

Juan Maldacena and Douglas Stanford. “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model”. In:Phys. Rev. D94.10 (2016), p. 106002.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.106002. arXiv: 1604.07818 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.106002 2016
[17]

Jensen, Chaos in AdS 2 Holography, Physical Review Letters117, 10.1103/physrevlett.117.111601 (2016)

Kristan Jensen. “Chaos in AdS 2 Holography”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.117.11 (2016), p. 111601.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.111601. arXiv:1605.06098 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.111601 2016
[18]

Maldacena, G

Juan Maldacena, Gustavo J. Turiaci, and Zhenbin Yang.Two dimensional Nearly de Sitter gravity. 2025. arXiv:1904.01911 [hep-th].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1904.01911

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap

Thomas G. Mertens, Gustavo J. Turiaci, and Herman L. Verlinde. “Solving the Schwarzian via the Conformal Bootstrap”. In:JHEP08 (2017), p. 136.doi:10.1007/JHEP08(2017)

work page doi:10.1007/jhep08(2017 2017
[20]

arXiv:1705.08408 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[21]

Talks at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara

Alexei Kitaev.A simple model of quantum holography. Talks at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara. April 7 and May 27, 2015. 2015

2015
[22]

Tinto and J

Juan Maldacena and Douglas Stanford. “Remarks on the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model”. In:Physical Review D94.10 (Nov. 2016).issn: 2470-0029.doi:10.1103/physrevd. 94.106002.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.106002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2016
[23]

Berkooz, M

Micha Berkooz, Mikhail Isachenkov, Vladimir Narovlansky, and Genis Torrents. “To- wards a full solution of the large N double-scaled SYK model”. In:JHEP03 (2019), p. 079.doi:10.1007/JHEP03(2019)079. arXiv:1811.02584 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep03(2019)079 2019
[24]

Lin and D

Henry W. Lin and Douglas Stanford. “A symmetry algebra in double-scaled SYK”. In: SciPost Phys.15.6 (2023), p. 234.doi:10 . 21468 / SciPostPhys . 15 . 6 . 234. arXiv: 2307.15725 [hep-th]. – 30 –

work page arXiv 2023
[25]

Projectors, shadows, and conformal blocks

David Simmons-Duffin. “Projectors, shadows, and conformal blocks”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2014.4 (Apr. 2014).issn: 1029-8479.doi:10.1007/jhep04(2014) 146.url:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2014)146

work page doi:10.1007/jhep04(2014 2014
[26]

A note on the representations of SO(1,d + 1)

Zimo Sun. “A note on the representations of SO(1,d + 1)”. In:Rev. Math. Phys.37.01 (2025), p. 2430007.doi:10.1142/S0129055X24300073. arXiv:2111.04591 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x24300073 2025
[27]

American Mathe- matical Society, 1969

BY Harish-Chandra.Harmonic analysis on semisimple Lie groups. American Mathe- matical Society, 1969

1969
[28]

Naum Iakovlevich Vilenkin.Special functions and the theory of group representations. Vol. 22. American Mathematical Soc., 1978

1978
[29]

Probing de Sitter space using CFT states

Kazuki Doi, Naoki Ogawa, Kotaro Shinmyo, Yu-ki Suzuki, and Tadashi Takayanagi. “Probing de Sitter space using CFT states”. In:JHEP02 (2025), p. 093.doi:10 . 1007/JHEP02(2025)093. arXiv:2405.14237 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

Conformal vacua and entropy in de Sitter space

Raphael Bousso, Alexander Maloney, and Andrew Strominger. “Conformal vacua and entropy in de Sitter space”. In:Phys. Rev. D65 (2002), p. 104039.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD.65.104039. arXiv:hep-th/0112218

work page arXiv 2002
[31]

Towards a microscopic description of de Sitter dynamics

Vladimir Narovlansky. “Towards a microscopic description of de Sitter dynamics”. In: (June 2025). arXiv:2506.02109 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[32]

On scrambling, tomperature and superdiffusion in de Sitter space

Alexey Milekhin and Jiuci Xu. “On scrambling, tomperature and superdiffusion in de Sitter space”. In:JHEP07 (2025), p. 272.doi:10.1007/JHEP07(2025)272. arXiv: 2403.13915 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep07(2025)272 2025
[33]

Herman Verlinde.Double-scaled SYK, Chords and de Sitter Gravity. 2024. arXiv:2402. 00635 [hep-th].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00635

work page arXiv 2024
[34]

3D near-de Sitter gravity and the soft mode of DSSYK

Tommaso Marini, Xiao-Liang Qi, and Herman Verlinde. “3D near-de Sitter gravity and the soft mode of DSSYK”. In: (Apr. 2026). arXiv:2604.21014 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[35]

Belaey, T.G

Andreas Belaey, Thomas G. Mertens, and Thomas Tappeiner. “Quantum group origins of edge states in double-scaled SYK”. In:JHEP02 (2026), p. 184.doi:10 . 1007 / JHEP02(2026)184. arXiv:2503.20691 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[36]

van der Heijden, E

Jeremy van der Heijden, Erik Verlinde, and Jiuci Xu. “Quantum Symmetry and Geom- etry in Double-Scaled SYK”. In: (Nov. 2025). arXiv:2511.08743 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[37]

The von Neumann algebraic quantum group $\mathrm{SU}_q(1,1)\rtimes \mathbb{Z}_2$ and the DSSYK model

Koen Schouten and Mikhail Isachenkov. “The von Neumann algebraic quantum group SUq(1,1)⋊ Z 2 and the DSSYK model”. In: (Dec. 2025). arXiv:2512.10101 [math-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[38]

Chaos and complementarity in de Sitter space

Lars Aalsma and Gary Shiu. “Chaos and complementarity in de Sitter space”. In:JHEP 05 (2020), p. 152.doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2020)152. arXiv:2002.01326 [hep-th]

work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)152 2020
[39]

Timelike entanglement entropy

Kazuki Doi, Jonathan Harper, Ali Mollabashi, Tadashi Takayanagi, and Yusuke Taki. “Timelike entanglement entropy”. In:JHEP05 (2023), p. 052.doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2023)

work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2023 2023
[40]

arXiv:2302.11695 [hep-th]. – 31 –

work page arXiv
[41]

Observable and computable en- tanglement in time

Alexey Milekhin, Zofia Adamska, and John Preskill. “Observable and computable en- tanglement in time”. In: (Feb. 2025). arXiv:2502.12240 [quant-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography

Julius Engels¨ oy, Thomas G. Mertens, and Herman Verlinde. “An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography”. In:Journal of High Energy Physics2016.7 (July 2016). issn: 1029-8479.doi:10 . 1007 / jhep07(2016 ) 139.url:http : / / dx . doi . org / 10 . 1007/JHEP07(2016)139. – 32 –

2016