arxiv: 2605.03089 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

Anisotropic non-Maxwellian velocity distributions in the solar transition region

Bart De Pontieu, Kyuhyoun Cho, Paola Testa, Thomas Ayres

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR

keywords solar transition regionSi IVnon-Gaussian line profilesanisotropic velocity distributionsmagnetic field orientationIRIS observationssuprathermal ionskinetic processes

0 comments

The pith

Non-Gaussian Si IV profiles are far more common when the magnetic field lies at large angles to the line of sight.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines full-disk IRIS mosaics of Si IV lines formed in the solar transition region. Roughly 60 percent of the profiles are non-Gaussian and k-like, a higher fraction than earlier studies reported. These k-like shapes appear significantly more often when the magnetic field is oriented nearly perpendicular to the line of sight, and the pattern holds at every intensity level. The same profiles also show narrower widths and smaller redshifts than Gaussian ones, especially inside bright plage and moss. The observations therefore point to anisotropic ion velocity distributions that standard fluid models do not include.

Core claim

High-resolution IRIS observations of Si IV show that k-like line profiles, indicative of suprathermal velocity distributions, comprise about 60 percent of the data and are significantly more prevalent when the magnetic field is oriented at large angles with respect to the line of sight. This angle dependence persists at all intensity levels. k-like profiles on average exhibit more limited line widths and reduced redshifts compared with Gaussian profiles, particularly in bright regions. The results supply direct evidence that anisotropic kinetic processes operate in the transition region and are not captured by the magnetohydrodynamic models routinely used for the low solar atmosphere.

What carries the argument

The systematic dependence of Si IV line-profile shape (Gaussian versus k-like) on the angle between the line of sight and the extrapolated magnetic-field direction.

If this is right

Non-Gaussian profiles constitute approximately 60 percent of transition-region observations rather than the smaller fraction previously assumed.
k-like profiles correspond to narrower line widths and weaker redshifts, especially inside bright regions.
Standard magnetohydrodynamic treatments miss the anisotropic kinetic effects required to explain the data.
Multi-fluid and kinetic modeling frameworks are needed to interpret transition-region spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same angle dependence may appear in other transition-region or low-coronal lines if the same ion populations dominate the emission.
Multi-spacecraft observations that sample different viewing angles simultaneously could test the anisotropy without relying on magnetic extrapolations.
Heating and acceleration models that assume isotropic Maxwellian distributions will systematically underestimate the role of non-thermal tails in the transition region.

Load-bearing premise

That observed line-profile shapes map directly and accurately onto the underlying ion velocity-distribution anisotropy, with magnetic extrapolations supplying reliable line-of-sight angles free of major projection or extrapolation errors.

What would settle it

A set of high-resolution multi-fluid or kinetic simulations of the transition region that contain no velocity anisotropy yet still reproduce the observed increase in k-like profiles at large magnetic angles would falsify the central claim.

read the original abstract

High resolution spectral observations of transition region spectral lines capture the signatures of energy deposition and redistribution at the boundary between the lower and upper atmosphere, and have significant relevance for investigating the physical processes responsible for heating the solar atmosphere. Spectroscopic observations of the solar transition region have long revealed excess line broadening and non-Gaussian profiles, but their physical origin remains debated, and their spatial distribution and prevalence not well established. Here we analyze Si IV line profiles in full-disk mosaics of observations with Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph (IRIS), and show that the non-Gaussian profiles comprise ~60% of the observed profiles, significantly more than previously reported. The IRIS observations, together with magnetic field extrapolations, indicate that the degree of non-Gaussianity systematically depends on the viewing angle between the line of sight and the magnetic field. We find that k-like profiles, indicative of suprathermal velocity distributions, are significantly more prevalent when the magnetic field is oriented at a large angle with respect to the line of sight, at all intensity levels. k-like profiles on average correspond to more limited line width and reduced redshift, compared with Gaussian profiles, particularly in bright regions, such as plage and moss. The results provide observational evidence of the importance of anisotropic kinetic processes in the solar transition region that are not captured by the magnetohydrodynamic approaches that are typically invoked to study the low solar atmosphere. Our observations indicate that more advanced multi-fluid and/or kinetic modeling should be developed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper's main new claim is an angle-dependent rise in k-like Si IV profiles at large angles to the extrapolated field, but the result rests on classification and extrapolation steps that need explicit validation.

read the letter

The key thing to know is that this work reports k-like non-Gaussian Si IV profiles making up roughly 60% of the observed transition-region lines in IRIS full-disk mosaics, with the fraction rising systematically when the line of sight is more perpendicular to the magnetic field, at every intensity level. Those k-like profiles also tend to be narrower and less redshifted, especially in bright plage and moss regions. That combination of prevalence, angle trend, and secondary correlations is what is actually new compared with earlier reports of excess broadening alone. The dataset size and the attempt to tie profile shape directly to viewing geometry give the paper some observational weight that prior studies lacked. The suggestion that anisotropic kinetic effects are at play follows reasonably from the trends, though it remains an interpretation rather than a direct measurement. The soft spots are exactly where the stress-test note flags them. The paper does not detail the quantitative thresholds or fitting routines used to label profiles k-like versus Gaussian, so it is unclear how much the trend could be driven by signal-to-noise variations or unresolved flows that themselves change with disk position. Magnetic-field angles come from extrapolations whose accuracy at transition-region heights is not independently checked in the provided text, and any position-dependent error would couple directly to the angle bins being tested. These are not fatal but they are load-bearing for the central result. The work is aimed at solar physicists who track transition-region heating and non-Maxwellian distributions. A reader already following IRIS spectroscopy or kinetic modeling will extract a useful observational constraint from the reported fractions and correlations. It is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee rather than a desk reject, though the referees will need to see the methods section on classification and extrapolation validation before the angle dependence can be taken as secure.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes full-disk IRIS mosaics of Si IV 1393.755 Å line profiles in the solar transition region. It reports that non-Gaussian (k-like) profiles comprise ~60% of observations—higher than prior estimates—and that these profiles are significantly more prevalent when the angle between the line of sight and the extrapolated magnetic field is large, independent of intensity. k-like profiles also show narrower widths and reduced redshifts relative to Gaussian profiles, especially in bright regions. The authors interpret this as evidence for anisotropic suprathermal velocity distributions and call for multi-fluid/kinetic modeling beyond standard MHD approaches.

Significance. If the central observational trend is robust, the result supplies a clear, intensity-independent constraint on anisotropic kinetic processes in the transition region that are invisible to MHD models. The full-disk coverage and direct comparison with magnetic extrapolations are strengths that could motivate targeted kinetic simulations and new observing strategies. The work is purely observational with no circular derivations, and the reported prevalence and angle dependence would be a useful benchmark if the classification and extrapolation steps are placed on firmer quantitative footing.

major comments (3)

[Data analysis / profile classification] The manuscript provides no quantitative description of the profile-fitting procedure, the exact threshold or metric used to classify profiles as k-like versus Gaussian, or any validation against synthetic data or noise realizations. This classification step is load-bearing for both the ~60% prevalence claim and the reported angle dependence.
[Magnetic field extrapolation and angle determination] No error analysis or validation is presented for the magnetic-field extrapolations at transition-region heights, nor any assessment of how projection effects, magnetogram resolution, or extrapolation uncertainties propagate into the angle bins. Because the full-disk mosaic spans center-to-limb and quiet-Sun to plage, systematic errors in the derived angles could correlate with the same variable being tested.
[Results and discussion of angle trends] The analysis does not address whether signal-to-noise variations, multi-component flows, or instrumental line-spread-function effects vary systematically with disk position or field inclination and could therefore drive the apparent angle dependence of the k-like fraction.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that k-like profiles are 'significantly more prevalent' but does not report the statistical test or confidence level used to establish significance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We have carefully addressed each of the major comments by expanding the quantitative descriptions, adding error analyses, and discussing potential systematic effects in the revised version. Our point-by-point responses are provided below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Data analysis / profile classification] The manuscript provides no quantitative description of the profile-fitting procedure, the exact threshold or metric used to classify profiles as k-like versus Gaussian, or any validation against synthetic data or noise realizations. This classification step is load-bearing for both the ~60% prevalence claim and the reported angle dependence.

Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not include a sufficiently quantitative description of the classification procedure. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated subsection in the Methods that specifies the fitting approach, the metric used to distinguish k-like from Gaussian profiles, the exact classification threshold, and the results of validation tests performed on synthetic line profiles that incorporate realistic noise levels and instrumental effects. These additions directly support the robustness of both the prevalence statistic and the angle dependence. revision: yes
Referee: [Magnetic field extrapolation and angle determination] No error analysis or validation is presented for the magnetic-field extrapolations at transition-region heights, nor any assessment of how projection effects, magnetogram resolution, or extrapolation uncertainties propagate into the angle bins. Because the full-disk mosaic spans center-to-limb and quiet-Sun to plage, systematic errors in the derived angles could correlate with the same variable being tested.

Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative treatment of extrapolation uncertainties was missing. The revised manuscript now contains an expanded section on the magnetic-field extrapolations that includes error estimates arising from magnetogram resolution, projection effects, and the choice of extrapolation method at transition-region heights. We have performed sensitivity tests by varying key parameters and propagating the resulting angle uncertainties into the binned statistics; the reported angle dependence of the k-like fraction remains statistically significant after these tests. revision: yes
Referee: [Results and discussion of angle trends] The analysis does not address whether signal-to-noise variations, multi-component flows, or instrumental line-spread-function effects vary systematically with disk position or field inclination and could therefore drive the apparent angle dependence of the k-like fraction.

Authors: We have revised the Results and Discussion to examine these potential confounders explicitly. We show that the observed trend in k-like fraction with angle persists after binning by signal-to-noise ratio and after restricting the sample to regions of comparable intensity. Multi-component flow signatures were inspected and do not correlate with viewing angle in a manner that would bias the classification. The instrumental line-spread function is uniform across the IRIS field of view and therefore cannot introduce a position- or inclination-dependent bias. These checks have been added to the text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational analysis with independent data comparison

full rationale

The paper performs direct observational analysis of IRIS Si IV line profiles across full-disk mosaics, classifying them as Gaussian or k-like and correlating the prevalence of k-like shapes with the angle between extrapolated magnetic field and line of sight. No mathematical derivation, first-principles prediction, parameter fitting, or ansatz is claimed or present; the central result follows from binning observed profile shapes against independently obtained magnetic angles at fixed intensity levels. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or renamings of known results are load-bearing. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks (IRIS spectra and standard extrapolations) and does not reduce any output to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard spectroscopic interpretation of line shapes and magnetic field extrapolations; no new free parameters or entities are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

k-like profile classification threshold
Criterion used to separate Gaussian from non-Gaussian profiles is not specified in the abstract but is required for the reported fractions.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Si IV line profiles faithfully trace the line-of-sight velocity distribution of emitting ions
Standard assumption invoked when interpreting excess broadening and non-Gaussian shapes as suprathermal velocities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5571 in / 1234 out tokens · 64848 ms · 2026-05-08T17:36:06.422905+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[1]

Solar Physics , keywords =

De Pontieu, B., Title, A.M., Lemen, J.R., Kushner, G.D., Akin, D.J., Allard, B., Berger, T., Boerner, P., Cheung, M., Chou, C., Drake, J.F., Duncan, D.W., Free- land, S., Heyman, G.F., Hoffman, C., Hurlburt, N.E., Lindgren, R.W., Mathur, D., Rehse, R., Sabolish, D., Seguin, R., Schrijver, C.J., Tarbell, T.D., W¨ ulser, J.-P., Wolfson, C.J., Yanari, C., Mu...

work page doi:10.1007/s11207-014-0485-y 2014
[2]

ApJ211, 579–586 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1086/154966

Kjeldseth Moe, O., Nicolas, K.R.: Emission measures, electron densities, and non- thermal velocities from optically thin UV lines near a quiet solar limb. ApJ211, 579–586 (1977) https://doi.org/10.1086/154966

work page doi:10.1086/154966 1977
[3]

Sol.Phys

Dere, K.P., Mason, H.E.: Nonthermal Velocities in the Solar Transition Zone Observed with the High-Resolution Telescope and Spectrograph. Sol.Phys. 144(2), 217–241 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00627590

work page doi:10.1007/bf00627590 1993
[4]

ApJ272, 329–348 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1086/161297

Brueckner, G.E., Bartoe, J.-D.F.: Observations of high-energy jets in the corona above the quiet sun, the heating of the corona, and the acceleration of the solar wind. ApJ272, 329–348 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1086/161297

work page doi:10.1086/161297 1983
[5]

A&A 360, 761–776 (2000)

Peter, H.: Multi-component structure of solar and stellar transition regions. A&A 360, 761–776 (2000)

2000
[6]

A2 Fraction ofκlike and Gaussian profiles as a function ofcos(i)for different quartiles in intensity, and averageαin those quartiles, for SW region shown in Figure 2

Peter, H.: On the nature of the transition region from the chromosphere to 10 Fig. A2 Fraction ofκlike and Gaussian profiles as a function ofcos(i)for different quartiles in intensity, and averageαin those quartiles, for SW region shown in Figure 2. The fraction ofκlike (black) and Gaussian (red) profiles vs. cos(i) presents very similar qualitative behav...

2001
[7]

De Pontieu, B., McIntosh, S., Martinez-Sykora, J., Peter, H., Pereira, T.M.D.: Why is Non-Thermal Line Broadening of Spectral Lines in the Lower Transition Region of the Sun Independent of Spatial Resolution? ApJL799(1), 12 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/799/1/L12 arXiv:1710.06807 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/799/1/l12 2015
[8]

ApJ842(1), 19 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aa71a8 arXiv:1705.02104 [astro-ph.SR]

Dud´ ık, J., Polito, V., Dzifˇ c´ akov´ a, E., Del Zanna, G., Testa, P.: Non-Maxwellian Analysis of the Transition-region Line Profiles Observed by the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph. ApJ842(1), 19 (2017) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aa71a8 arXiv:1705.02104 [astro-ph.SR]

work page arXiv 2017
[9]

Hannah, I.G., Christe, S., Krucker, S., Hurford, G.J., Hudson, H.S., Lin, R.P.: RHESSI Microflare Statistics. II. X-Ray Imaging, Spectroscopy, and Energy Distributions. ApJ677(1), 704–718 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1086/ 529012 arXiv:0712.2544 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[10]

2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 891, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab7341

Glesener, L., Krucker, S., Duncan, J., Hannah, I.G., Grefenstette, B.W., Chen, B., Smith, D.M., White, S.M., Hudson, H.: Accelerated Electrons Observed Down 11 to <7 keV in a NuSTAR Solar Microflare. ApJL891(2), 34 (2020) https://doi. org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab7341 arXiv:2003.12864 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab7341 2020
[11]

Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences submitted(2023)

Polito, V., Peterson, M., Glesener, L., Testa, P., Yu, S., Reeves, K.K., Sun, X.: Multi-wavelength observations and modelling of a microflare: constraining non-thermal particle acceleration. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences submitted(2023)

2023
[12]

In: Handbook of X-ray and Gamma- ray Astrophysics, pp

Testa, P., Reale, F.: The solar x-ray corona. In: Handbook of X-ray and Gamma- ray Astrophysics, pp. 1–38. Springer, ??? (2023)

2023
[13]

Science 346(6207), 1255724 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1255724 arXiv:1410.6130 [astro-ph.SR]

Testa, P., De Pontieu, B., Allred, J., Carlsson, M., Reale, F., Daw, A., Hansteen, V., Martinez-Sykora, J., Liu, W., DeLuca, E.E., Golub, L., McKillop, S., Reeves, K., Saar, S., Tian, H., Lemen, J., Title, A., Boerner, P., Hurlburt, N., Tarbell, T.D., Wuelser, J.P., Kleint, L., Kankelborg, C., Jaeggli, S.: Evidence of nonther- mal particles in coronal loo...

work page doi:10.1126/science.1255724 2014
[14]

Astrophys

Testa, P., Polito, V., De Pontieu, B.: IRIS Observations of Short-term Variability in Moss Associated with Transient Hot Coronal Loops. ApJ889(2), 124 (2020) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab63cf arXiv:1910.08201 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab63cf 2020
[15]

Astrophys

Cho, K., Testa, P., De Pontieu, B., Polito, V.: A Statistical Study of IRIS Observa- tional Signatures of Nanoflares and Nonthermal Particles. ApJ945(2), 143 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acb7da arXiv:2211.06832 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb7da 2023
[16]

ApJ956(2), 85 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/acf4f1 arXiv:2308.15417 [astro-ph.SR]

Testa, P., Bakke, H., Rouppe van der Voort, L., De Pontieu, B.: High-resolution Observations of the Low Atmospheric Response to Small Coronal Heating Events in an Active Region Core. ApJ956(2), 85 (2023) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/acf4f1 arXiv:2308.15417 [astro-ph.SR]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Ayres, T., De Pontieu, B., Testa, P.: In the Trenches of the Solar-stellar Con- nection. IV. Solar Full-disk Scans of C II, Si IV, and Mg II by the Interface Region Imaging Spectrograph. ApJ916(1), 36 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/abfa92

2021
[18]

ApJ 281, 870–883 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1086/162167

Dere, K.P., Bartoe, J.-D.F., Brueckner, G.E.: High-resolution telescope and spec- trograph observations of the quiet solar chromosphere and transition zone. ApJ 281, 870–883 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1086/162167

work page doi:10.1086/162167 1984
[19]

ApJ516(1), 490–504 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1086/307102

Peter, H.: Analysis of Transition-Region Emission-Line Profiles from Full-Disk Scans of the Sun Using the SUMER Instrument on SOHO. ApJ516(1), 490–504 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1086/307102

work page doi:10.1086/307102 1999
[20]

MNRAS526(1), 383–390 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2761 arXiv:2309.06360 [astro-ph.SR] 12

Kayshap, P., Young, P.R.: Centre-to-limb variations in coronal hole and quiet sun regions obtained with IRIS spectroscopic observations. MNRAS526(1), 383–390 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2761 arXiv:2309.06360 [astro-ph.SR] 12

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2761 2023
[21]

Sol.Phys.275(1-2), 3–15 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11207-011-9841-3

Pesnell, W.D., Thompson, B.J., Chamberlin, P.C.: The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Sol.Phys.275(1-2), 3–15 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11207-011-9841-3

2012
[22]

ApJ856(2), 178 (2018) https://doi.org/10

Polito, V., Testa, P., Allred, J., De Pontieu, B., Carlsson, M., Pereira, T.M.D., Goˇ si´ c, M., Reale, F.: Investigating the Response of Loop Plasma to Nanoflare Heating Using RADYN Simulations. ApJ856(2), 178 (2018) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/aab49e arXiv:1804.05970 [astro-ph.SR]

work page arXiv 2018
[23]

Mass motions in the transition zone in regions of solar activity

Doschek, G.A., Feldman, U.: EUV spectra from Skylab (1175 - 1940 ˚A). Mass motions in the transition zone in regions of solar activity. A&A69(1), 11–21 (1978)

1940
[24]

ApJ505(2), 957–973 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/306179

Chae, J., Sch¨ uhle, U., Lemaire, P.: SUMER Measurements of Nonthermal Motions: Constraints on Coronal Heating Mechanisms. ApJ505(2), 957–973 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1086/306179

work page doi:10.1086/306179 1998
[25]

ApJ478(2), 745– 765 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1086/303821

Wood, B.E., Linsky, J.L., Ayres, T.R.: Evaluating Possible Heating Mechanisms Using the Transition Region Line Profiles of Late-Type Stars. ApJ478(2), 745– 765 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1086/303821

work page doi:10.1086/303821 1997
[26]

A&A415, 331– 348 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20034002 arXiv:astro-ph/0310901 [astro-ph]

Pagano, I., Linsky, J.L., Valenti, J., Duncan, D.K.: HST/STIS high resolution echelle spectra of ¡ASTROBJ¿αCentauri A¡/ASTROBJ¿ (G2 V). A&A415, 331– 348 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20034002 arXiv:astro-ph/0310901 [astro-ph]

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20034002 2004
[27]

Modeling Extragalactic Foregrounds and Secondaries for Un- biased Estimation of Cosmological Parameters from Primary Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy

Linsky, J.L., Bushinsky, R., Ayres, T., France, K.: Ultraviolet Spectroscopy of Rapidly Rotating Solar-Mass Stars: Emission-line Redshifts as a Test of the Solar- Stellar Connection. ApJ754(1), 69 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/ 754/1/69 arXiv:1205.6498 [astro-ph.SR]

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/ 2012
[28]

AJ149(2), 58 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/58

Ayres, T.R.: The Far-Ultraviolet Ups and Downs of Alpha Centauri. AJ149(2), 58 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/58

work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/149/2/58 2015
[29]

Nature Astronomy 5, 237–245 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01263-2

Bahauddin, S.M., Bradshaw, S.J., Winebarger, A.R.: The origin of reconnection- mediated transient brightenings in the solar transition region. Nature Astronomy 5, 237–245 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-020-01263-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01263-2 2021
[30]

ApJL 880(1), 12 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f91

Graham, D.R., De Pontieu, B., Testa, P.: Automated Detection of Rapid Vari- ability of Moss Using SDO/AIA and Its Connection to the Solar Corona. ApJL 880(1), 12 (2019) https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f91

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab2f91 2019
[31]

S., Sturrock , P

Wheatland, M.S., Sturrock, P.A., Roumeliotis, G.: An Optimization Approach to Reconstructing Force-free Fields. ApJ540(2), 1150–1155 (2000) https://doi.org/ 10.1086/309355

work page doi:10.1086/309355 2000
[32]

ApJL975(1), 33 (2024) https://doi.org/10

Cho, K., De Pontieu, B., Testa, P.: On the Nature of Nonthermal Broadening 13 of Spectral Lines Observed by IRIS. ApJL975(1), 33 (2024) https://doi.org/10. 3847/1538-4357/ad7586 arXiv:2410.19032 [astro-ph.SR] 14 Fig. A3 2D histogram of Siivline shift and width for the brightest transition region features (i.e., moss) in the SW region.The 2D histograms sho...

work page arXiv 2024