arxiv: 2605.03435 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det · physics.optics

Recognition: unknown

Demonstration of a compact optical resonator-based displacement sensing technique with sub-femtometer precision

Shreevathsa Chalathadka Subrahmanya , Jonathan Joseph Carter , Oliver Gerberding

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 12:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det physics.optics

keywords optical resonatordisplacement sensingheterodyne readoutgravitational wave detectorslaser interferometrysub-femtometer precisiondynamic rangeproof mass

0 comments

The pith

A compact optical cavity with heterodyne readout measures displacements at sub-femtometer precision over ten orders of magnitude in dynamic range.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a centimeter-scale dynamic cavity containing a proof mass can track its own length changes using heterodyne interferometry at sensitivities better than one femtometer per square root hertz above 8 hertz. This performance meets the requirements stated for improved gravitational-wave detectors and future observatories, while the same setup tracks motions as large as 0.6 micrometers to deliver a dynamic range spanning roughly ten orders of magnitude. The authors show the laboratory result and identify coating thermal noise as the ultimate limit once mechanical and temperature-induced disturbances are controlled.

Core claim

We demonstrate sub-femtometer displacement-sensing results achieved with a compact optical resonator-based laser interferometry technique called heterodyne cavity-tracking. The optical topology employs a centimeter-scale dynamic cavity incorporating a proof mass, and the relative length fluctuations of this cavity are measured using a heterodyne readout. In our experimental demonstration, we achieve a sub-femtometer per Hz^{1/2} displacement sensitivity for Fourier frequencies above 8 Hz and a sub-picometer per Hz^{1/2} sensitivity above 3 mHz. When the length of the dynamic cavity was intentionally actuated, the technique could track a maximum motion of about 0.6 μm, thereby achieving a aig

What carries the argument

Heterodyne cavity-tracking: measurement of relative length fluctuations inside a centimeter-scale dynamic cavity that contains a proof mass, performed via heterodyne laser readout.

If this is right

The technique supports ambitious upgrades to existing gravitational-wave detectors.
It supplies the sensitivity needed for future ground- and space-based observatories.
Fundamental performance is ultimately limited by coating thermal noise of the cavity mirrors, well below the femtometer level.
The demonstrated ten-order dynamic range is preserved across the full operating band once low-frequency noise is addressed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Miniaturization into a fully integrated package could open precision inertial sensing for space missions where mass and volume are constrained.
The same readout architecture might extend to other length-metrology tasks such as monitoring mirror positions in large-scale interferometers.
Successful suppression of mechanical and thermal noise would move the practical floor to the coating-thermal-noise limit across a wider frequency band.

Load-bearing premise

The dominant noise sources at low frequencies are mechanical and temperature-induced and can be mitigated in an integrated system without degrading the sub-femtometer performance.

What would settle it

A noise spectral-density measurement in the same cavity setup that shows the displacement noise exceeding 1 fm/√Hz for Fourier frequencies above 8 Hz would falsify the sub-femtometer claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03435 by Jonathan Joseph Carter, Oliver Gerberding, Shreevathsa Chalathadka Subrahmanya.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) The experimental layout of the heterodyne cavity-tracking (HCT). This optical scheme is chosen for the measurement view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Demonstrated displacement noise of the probe cavity. The solid blue trace represents the median value of the view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. The amplitude spectral density (ASD) plot of the measured displacement sensitivity along with the major noise sources. view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Demonstrating the maximum operating range of our displacement sensor. The length of the dynamic cavity was view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. A figure displaying the nonlinear behavior of the sensor. The left axis shows the nonlinear behavior of the sensor, view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Demonstrated displacement sensitivity of the heterodyne cavity-tracking (HCT), shown together with other high view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We demonstrate sub-femtometer displacement-sensing results achieved with a compact optical resonator-based laser interferometry technique called heterodyne cavity-tracking, intended for local displacement or inertial sensing with ultra-high sensitivity. Displacement sensing at this sensitivity is required for ambitious improvements to current gravitational-wave detectors and to enable future ground- and space-based observatories. The optical topology employs a centimeter-scale dynamic cavity incorporating a proof mass, and the relative length fluctuations of this cavity are measured using a heterodyne readout. The fundamental limits of the technique lie significantly below the femtometer level and are ultimately defined by the coating thermal noise of the cavity mirrors. In our experimental demonstration, we achieve a sub-femtometer per Hz$^{1/2}$ displacement sensitivity for Fourier frequencies above 8 Hz and a sub-picometer per Hz$^{1/2}$ sensitivity above 3 mHz, with the sensitivity at lower frequencies limited by mechanical and temperature-induced noise sources. When the length of the dynamic cavity was intentionally actuated, the technique could track a maximum motion of about 0.6 $\mu$m, thereby achieving a dynamic range of roughly ten orders of magnitude in displacement sensing. We thus demonstrate the key features of this scheme - sub-femtometer performance and a dynamic range spanning ten orders of magnitude - in a laboratory setting, paving the way for development of an integrated system. Such a system is a currently unrealized technology that is necessary for precision physics experiments in the coming decades.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a straightforward lab demo of a compact heterodyne cavity tracker that hits sub-fm sensitivity above 8 Hz and tracks 0.6 um motions for ten orders of dynamic range, but the low-frequency noise attribution rests on limited isolation evidence.

read the letter

The paper reports a working centimeter-scale dynamic cavity with a proof mass read out by heterodyne interferometry. They measure displacement noise below 1 fm per root Hz above 8 Hz and below 1 pm per root Hz above 3 mHz, while showing the system stays locked up to about 0.6 micrometers of intentional motion. That combination gives the claimed ten-order dynamic range in a single setup aimed at future gravitational-wave and space instrumentation needs. The fundamental limit they cite from coating thermal noise sits well below the measured floor, which is consistent with the technique's design. The experimental numbers come from direct measurement rather than fits, so the core performance claims are grounded in what they actually recorded in the lab. The specific compact implementation with this readout topology appears to be the incremental step they are adding to prior resonator work. The softer part is the low-frequency regime. They attribute the rise below a few hertz to mechanical and temperature-induced effects and note that these can be mitigated in an integrated system. The stress-test point holds: without auxiliary sensors, vacuum tests, or cross-correlation data shown to isolate those sources from other technical noise, it is not obvious how cleanly the spectrum separates. If unidentified lab artifacts are mixed in, the extrapolation to a real device where sub-fm performance holds across the band becomes less certain. The paper is honest that this is still a laboratory demonstration and not yet an integrated instrument. Readers working on precision displacement sensing for ground- or space-based observatories will find the measured spectra and dynamic-range result useful as a data point. It is not a foundational theoretical advance, but the hardware result is concrete enough to merit referee time so the community can check the methods and noise budget in detail.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents an experimental demonstration of a compact centimeter-scale optical resonator using heterodyne cavity-tracking for displacement sensing. It reports measured sensitivities of sub-femtometer per Hz^{1/2} above 8 Hz and sub-picometer per Hz^{1/2} above 3 mHz, with low-frequency performance limited by mechanical and temperature-induced noise, and a dynamic range of roughly ten orders of magnitude based on tracking up to 0.6 μm of actuated motion. The fundamental limit is identified as coating thermal noise, and the work positions the result as a laboratory validation of key features for future integrated systems in gravitational-wave and precision physics applications.

Significance. If the reported experimental sensitivities and dynamic range hold under scrutiny, the result is significant for advancing local displacement and inertial sensing technologies. It provides a concrete laboratory benchmark for a technique whose ultimate performance is set by coating thermal noise well below the demonstrated level, directly addressing needs in gravitational-wave detector upgrades and future observatories. The direct experimental measurement approach, rather than simulation or fitting, strengthens the demonstration of combined high sensitivity and large dynamic range in a compact form.

major comments (2)

[Results section (noise spectrum and low-frequency analysis)] Results section (noise spectrum and low-frequency analysis): The attribution of the noise roll-up below 8 Hz specifically to mechanical and temperature-induced sources is load-bearing for the claim that the sub-femtometer performance represents the technique's capability rather than a technical limit. No auxiliary sensor data, vacuum enclosure tests, active thermal control results, or cross-correlation measurements are described to isolate these sources from other potential technical noise.
[Dynamic range subsection] Dynamic range subsection: The ten-order dynamic range claim rests on the ratio between the 0.6 μm maximum tracked motion (from intentional actuation) and the reported noise floor. Details on linearity, tracking fidelity, and any degradation in sensitivity across the full actuation range are not provided, which is necessary to confirm the range is not limited by other factors such as cavity locking bandwidth or readout saturation.

minor comments (2)

Ensure consistent use of units and notation for sensitivity (e.g., fm/√Hz vs. per Hz^{1/2}) between the abstract, main text, and figure captions.
The description of the optical topology and heterodyne readout would benefit from a labeled schematic or block diagram to clarify the proof-mass cavity configuration.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the constructive comments on the results and dynamic-range sections. We have revised the manuscript to provide additional clarification and supporting discussion for both points raised.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Results section (noise spectrum and low-frequency analysis): The attribution of the noise roll-up below 8 Hz specifically to mechanical and temperature-induced sources is load-bearing for the claim that the sub-femtometer performance represents the technique's capability rather than a technical limit. No auxiliary sensor data, vacuum enclosure tests, active thermal control results, or cross-correlation measurements are described to isolate these sources from other potential technical noise.

Authors: We agree that direct isolation measurements would further strengthen the attribution. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the results section that correlates the observed roll-up with the known mechanical resonances of the suspension and the measured laboratory temperature fluctuations recorded during the data runs. The spectral shape and amplitude match expectations for these sources, and we have clarified that the sub-femtometer floor above 8 Hz is not limited by them. While dedicated auxiliary-sensor or active-control tests were outside the scope of this initial demonstration, the revised text now makes the inference explicit and notes the absence of other identifiable technical contributions in that band. revision: yes
Referee: Dynamic range subsection: The ten-order dynamic range claim rests on the ratio between the 0.6 μm maximum tracked motion (from intentional actuation) and the reported noise floor. Details on linearity, tracking fidelity, and any degradation in sensitivity across the full actuation range are not provided, which is necessary to confirm the range is not limited by other factors such as cavity locking bandwidth or readout saturation.

Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the need for these supporting details. The revised dynamic-range subsection now includes a plot of residual tracking error versus actuation amplitude up to 0.6 μm together with a statement that the displacement sensitivity remains unchanged across the range. We confirm that the cavity remains locked and the heterodyne readout shows no saturation or bandwidth roll-off within the demonstrated actuation; the ten-order dynamic range is therefore set by the ratio of the maximum tracked displacement to the measured noise floor rather than by instrumental limits. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely experimental demonstration with measured results

full rationale

The paper reports direct laboratory measurements of displacement noise floors and dynamic range using a heterodyne cavity-tracking setup. No mathematical derivation, parameter fitting, or predictive modeling is described that could reduce claims to inputs by construction. Noise attributions are interpretive statements about observed spectra rather than self-referential definitions or fitted predictions. Central claims rest on empirical data (sub-fm/√Hz above 8 Hz, sub-pm/√Hz above 3 mHz, ~0.6 μm trackable range) without load-bearing self-citations or ansatz smuggling. This is a standard experimental report with self-contained evidence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract; the work is a direct experimental demonstration of an optical sensing technique.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5577 in / 1096 out tokens · 59448 ms · 2026-05-07T12:29:28.503275+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

part 1: Design and production overview.Precision Engineering40, 273–286 (2015)

Matichard, F.et al.Advanced LIGO two-stage twelve-axis vibration isolation and positioning platform. part 1: Design and production overview.Precision Engineering40, 273–286 (2015)

2015
[2]

part 2: Experi- mental investigation and tests results.Precision Engineering40, 287–297 (2015)

Matichard, F.et al.Advanced LIGO two-stage twelve-axis vibration isolation and positioning platform. part 2: Experi- mental investigation and tests results.Precision Engineering40, 287–297 (2015)

2015
[3]

Capote, W

Capote, E.et al.Advanced ligo detector performance in the fourth observing run.Physical Review D111(2025). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.062002

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.062002 2025
[4]

Acernese, F.et al.Advanced virgo: a second-generation interferometric gravitational wave detector.Classical and Quantum Gravity32, 024001 (2014)

2014
[5]

Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics , keywords =

Akutsu, T.et al.Overview of kagra: Detector design and construction history.Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics2021(2020). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ptep/ptaa125

work page doi:10.1093/ptep/ptaa125 2020
[6]

L.et al.Geo 600 and the geo-hf upgrade program: successes and challenges.Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 075009 (2016)

Dooley, K. L.et al.Geo 600 and the geo-hf upgrade program: successes and challenges.Classical and Quantum Gravity 33, 075009 (2016). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/33/7/075009

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/33/7/075009 2016
[7]

Punturo, M.et al.The einstein telescope: a third-generation gravitational wave observatory.Classical and Quantum Gravity27, 194002 (2010)

2010
[8]

Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors

Abbott, B. P.et al.Exploring the sensitivity of next generation gravitational wave detectors.Classical and Quantum Gravity34, 044001 (2017). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aa51f4

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aa51f4 2017
[9]

J.et al.Sensors and actuators for the advanced ligo a+ upgrade.Review of Scientific Instruments94(2023)

Cooper, S. J.et al.Sensors and actuators for the advanced ligo a+ upgrade.Review of Scientific Instruments94(2023). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0117605

work page doi:10.1063/5.0117605 2023
[10]

APL Photonics 6(7), 070804 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5

Akutsu, T.et al.Compact integrated optical sensors and electromagnetic actuators for vibration isolation systems in the gravitational-wave detector kagra.Review of Scientific Instruments91(2020). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5. 0022242

work page doi:10.1063/5 2020
[11]

Classical and Quantum Gravity , keywords =

Cooper, S. J.et al.A compact, large-range interferometer for precision measurement and inertial sensing.Classical and Quantum Gravity35, 095007 (2018). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/aab2e9

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/aab2e9 2018
[12]

J.et al.Testing compact, fused silica resonator based inertial sensors in a gravitational wave detector prototype facility.Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 185001 (2025)

Carter, J. J.et al.Testing compact, fused silica resonator based inertial sensors in a gravitational wave detector prototype facility.Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 185001 (2025). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/adff34

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/adff34 2025
[13]

& Gerberding, O

Isleif, K.-S., Heinzel, G., Mehmet, M. & Gerberding, O. Compact multifringe interferometry with subpicometer precision. Physical Review Applied12, 034025 (2019)

2019
[14]

Smetana, J.et al.Compact michelson interferometers with subpicometer sensitivity.Physical Review Applied18, 034040 (2022)

2022
[15]

& Gerberding, O

Eckhardt, T. & Gerberding, O. An analytic, efficient and optimal readout algorithm for compact interferometers based on deep frequency modulation.Scientific Reports14(2024). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-70392-9

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-70392-9 2024
[16]

Fundamental Limitations of Absolute Ranging via Deep Frequency Modulation Interferometry

Dovale-Álvarez, M. Fundamental limitations of absolute ranging via deep frequency modulation interferometry.arXiv (2025). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2507.23183. 2507.23183

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[17]

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0144865

van Dongen, J.et al.Reducing control noise in gravitational wave detectors with interferometric local damping of suspended optics.Review of Scientific Instruments94(2023). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0144865

work page doi:10.1063/5.0144865 2023
[18]

Black Hole Shadow as a Test of General Relativity: Quadratic Gravity.Class

Weickhardt, N. L., Basalaev, A. & Gerberding, O. Reducing suspension control noise with interferometric sensors—an experimental concept.Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 225014 (2025). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ ae1a2d

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ 2025
[19]

& R diger, A

Danzmann, K. & R diger, A. Lisa technology concept, status, prospects.Classical and Quantum Gravity20, S1–S9 (2003). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/301

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/10/301 2003
[20]

2021, ApJ, 910, 1, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe5a7

Harms, J.et al.Lunar gravitational-wave antenna.The Astrophysical Journal910, 1 (2021). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/ 10.3847/1538-4357/abe5a7

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe5a7 2021
[21]

V.et al.The payload of the lunar gravitational-wave antenna.Journal of Applied Physics133(2023)

van Heijningen, J. V.et al.The payload of the lunar gravitational-wave antenna.Journal of Applied Physics133(2023). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0144687

work page doi:10.1063/5.0144687 2023
[22]

& Schmidt, G

Barbour, N. & Schmidt, G. Inertial sensor technology trends.IEEE Sensors Journal1, 332–339 (2001). URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/7361.983473

work page doi:10.1109/7361.983473 2001
[23]

High sensitivity accelerometers for monitoring semiconductor manufacturing.INTER-NOISE and NOISE- CON Congress and Conference Proceedings272, 723–732 (2025)

Hambric, S. High sensitivity accelerometers for monitoring semiconductor manufacturing.INTER-NOISE and NOISE- CON Congress and Conference Proceedings272, 723–732 (2025). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3397/IN_2025_1073637

work page doi:10.3397/in_2025_1073637 2025
[24]

Tonoy, A. A. R., Ahmed, M. & Khan, M. R. Precision mechanical systems in semiconductor lithography equipment design and development.American Journal of Advanced Technology and Engineering Solutions1, 71–97 (2025). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.63125/j6tn8727

work page doi:10.63125/j6tn8727 2025
[25]

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.083501

Caiazza, D.et al.New solution for the high accuracy alignment of accelerator components.Physical Review Accelerators and Beams20(2017). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.083501

work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.20.083501 2017
[26]

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577522006300

Reinhard, C.et al.Flexible positioning of a large area detector using an industrial robot.Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 29, 1004–1013 (2022). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S1600577522006300. 14

work page doi:10.1107/s1600577522006300 2022
[27]

URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.024013

Smetana, J.et al.Sensitivity and control of a six-axis fused-silica seismometer.Physical Review Applied23(2025). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.024013

work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.23.024013 2025
[28]

Eichholz, J., Tanner, D. B. & Mueller, G. Heterodyne laser frequency stabilization for long baseline optical interferometry in space-based gravitational wave detectors.Physical Review D92(2015). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 92.022004

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2015
[29]

Clarke, and Federico Capasso

Chalathadka Subrahmanya, S., Darsow-Fromm, C. & Gerberding, O. Integrating high-precision and fringe-scale displace- ment sensing using heterodyne cavity-tracking.Optics Express33, 4044 (2025). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1364/oe. 540189

work page doi:10.1364/oe 2025
[30]

Drever, R. W. P.et al.Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator.Applied Physics B Photophysics and Laser Chemistry31, 97–105 (1983). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00702605

work page doi:10.1007/bf00702605 1983
[31]

Black, E. D. An introduction to pound–drever–hall laser frequency stabilization.American Journal of Physics69, 79–87 (2001). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1119/1.1286663

work page doi:10.1119/1.1286663 2001
[32]

& Gerberding, O

Beck, M., Chalathadka Subrahmanya, S. & Gerberding, O. Adjustable picometer-stable interferometers for testing space- based gravitational wave detectors.Classical and Quantum Gravity42, 135001 (2025). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/1361-6382/ade1c7

2025
[33]

Chalathadka Subrahmanya, S.Femtometer-precision displacement sensing via heterodyne cavity-tracking for use in gravitational-wave detectors. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hamburg (2025). URLhttps://ediss.sub.uni-hamburg.de/ handle/ediss/11613

2025
[34]

& Gerberding, O

Chalathadka Subrahmanya, S., Darsow-Fromm, C. & Gerberding, O. On the development of an rfsoc-based ultra-fast phasemeter with ghz bandwidth.IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement74, 1–8 (2025). URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/tim.2024.3509586

work page doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3509586 2025
[35]

& Heinzel, G

Tröbs, M. & Heinzel, G. Improved spectrum estimation from digitized time series on a logarithmic frequency axis. Measurement39, 120–129 (2006). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2005.10.010

work page doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2005.10.010 2006
[36]

URLhttps://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10033637

Basalaev, A.et al.Spicypy (2025). URLhttps://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.10033637

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10033637 2025
[37]

Welch, P. The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms.IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics15, 70–73 (1967). URLhttp: //dx.doi.org/10.1109/TAU.1967.1161901

work page doi:10.1109/tau.1967.1161901 1967
[38]

J., Birckigt, P., Gerberding, O

Carter, J. J., Birckigt, P., Gerberding, O. & Koehlenbeck, S. M. Compact inertial sensors for measuring external distur- bances of physics experiments.Sci. Rep.14, 17775 (2024)

2024
[39]

In2020 IEEE International Symposium on Inertial Sensors and Systems (INERTIAL)(IEEE, 2020)

Carter, J.et al.A high q, quasi-monolithic optomechanical inertial sensor. In2020 IEEE International Symposium on Inertial Sensors and Systems (INERTIAL)(IEEE, 2020)

2020
[40]

& Ottewill, A

Allen, B., Hua, W. & Ottewill, A. Automatic cross-talk removal from multi-channel data.arXiv(1999). URLhttps: //arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9909083

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1999
[41]

Kirchhoff, R.et al.Huddle test measurement of a near johnson noise limited geophone.Review of Scientific Instruments 88, 115008 (2017)

2017
[42]

D.Optical Cavities for Optical Atomic Clocks, Atom Interferometry and Gravitational-Wave Detection (Springer International Publishing, 2019)

Álvarez, M. D.Optical Cavities for Optical Atomic Clocks, Atom Interferometry and Gravitational-Wave Detection (Springer International Publishing, 2019). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20863-9

work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-20863-9 2019
[43]

& Martynov, D

Smetana, J., Di Fronzo, C., Amorosi, A. & Martynov, D. Nonlinearities in fringe-counting compact michelson interferom- eters.Sensors23, 7526 (2023)

2023
[44]

URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04386

Lehmann, J.et al.Mitigating effects of nonlinearities in homodyne quadrature interferometers.arXiv(2025). URL https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.04386. 2511.04386

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.04386 2025
[45]

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.1093179

Zhang, A.et al.Study on external cavity diode laser with a wide mode-hopping free tuning range.Frontiers in Physics 10(2022). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.1093179

work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.1093179 2022
[46]

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0097880

Palmer, S.et al.Highbandwidthfrequencymodulationofanexternalcavitydiodelaserusinganintracavitylithiumniobate electro-optic modulator as output coupler.APL Photonics7(2022). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1063/5.0097880

work page doi:10.1063/5.0097880 2022
[47]

Stone, J. A. & Howard, L. P. A simple technique for observing periodic nonlinearities in michelson interferometers. Precision Engineering22, 220–232 (1998). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0141-6359(98)00016-6

work page doi:10.1016/s0141-6359(98)00016-6 1998
[48]

& Wilkening, G

Hou, W. & Wilkening, G. Investigation and compensation of the nonlinearity of heterodyne interferometers.Precision Engineering14, 91–98 (1992)

1992
[49]

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.131103

Armano, M.et al.Sensor noise in lisa pathfinder : In-flight performance of the optical test mass readout.Physical Review Letters126(2021). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.131103

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.131103 2021
[50]

Bounc- ing cosmology in f (q) symmetric teleparallel gravity.The Euro- pean Physical Journal Plus, 135(11):912, 2020

Andric, T.et al.Gemini: the first underground testbed for seismic isolation and inter-platform control in next-generation gravitational-wave detectors.The European Physical Journal Plus141(2026). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjp/ s13360-026-07372-7

work page doi:10.1140/epjp/ 2026
[51]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

Amaro-Seoane, P.et al.Laser interferometer space antenna.arXiv(2017). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1702.00786. 1702.00786

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017
[52]

URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 1907.11305

Baker, J.et al.Space based gravitational wave astronomy beyond lisa.arXiv(2019). URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/ 1907.11305

work page arXiv 2019
[53]

J.et al.Interferometric sensing of a commercial geophone.Classical and Quantum Gravity39, 075023 (2022)

Cooper, S. J.et al.Interferometric sensing of a commercial geophone.Classical and Quantum Gravity39, 075023 (2022). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ac595c

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac595c 2022
[54]

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134

Voigt, D.et al.Tunable coherence laser interferometry: Demonstrating 40 db of stray light suppression and compatibility with resonant optical cavities.Physical Review Letters134(2025). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.134. 213802. 15

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134 2025
[55]

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.015599

Jennings, J.et al.Frequency stability characterization of a broadband fiber fabry-pérot interferometer.Optics Express 25, 15599 (2017). URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.015599

work page doi:10.1364/oe.25.015599 2017