pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03526 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: unknown

Influence of ligand field and correlation on the electronic structure of NiO and CoO from DFT+DMFT calculations

Christian Els\"asser, Daniel F. Urban, Daniel Mutter, Frank Lechermann

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 04:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords NiOCoODFT+DMFTligand fieldspectral functionselectron correlationrock-salt structurezincblende structure
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ligand fields from rock-salt and zincblende structures shape spectral functions in paramagnetic NiO and CoO as U varies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper applies charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT to examine the electronic structure of nickel oxide and cobalt oxide in their paramagnetic states. It compares the common rock-salt crystal structure to the zincblende structure to determine how the different oxygen arrangements around the metal ions produce distinct ligand fields that split the 3d electron levels differently. Varying the interaction parameter U tests the impact of stronger or weaker correlations among the transition-metal 3d electrons on the resulting spectral functions. The calculations also incorporate correlations in the oxygen 2p orbitals through a self-interaction-correction pseudopotential scheme to assess its additional influence. These comparisons clarify how composition, structure, and correlation strength together control the energy distribution of electron states in these materials.

Core claim

For paramagnetic NiO and CoO, the spectral functions depend on the ligand field set by rock-salt versus zincblende structures and on the correlation strength among the transition-metal 3d electrons as set by the interaction parameter U, with further changes when correlations in the oxygen 2p orbitals are included via a self-interaction-correction pseudopotential scheme.

What carries the argument

Charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT calculations performed on different crystal structures, with tunable U for 3d electrons and a self-interaction-correction pseudopotential for oxygen 2p orbitals, used to obtain spectral functions.

Load-bearing premise

The calculations assume that chosen values of U and the self-interaction-correction pseudopotential for oxygen 2p orbitals adequately capture the relevant correlations without requiring more advanced treatments such as full charge self-consistency or explicit inclusion of other orbitals.

What would settle it

Experimental photoemission spectra measured on zincblende-structured NiO or CoO that fail to exhibit the predicted differences in peak positions and weights relative to the rock-salt phase would refute the claimed influence of the ligand field.

read the original abstract

The intriguing physics and rich application potential of strongly correlated first-row transition metal oxide compounds result from the complex interplay of several factors that influence the electronic structure. To shed light on the effect of composition, structure, and correlation strength, we apply a well-established charge self-consistent combination of density functional theory and dynamical mean field theory, which has proven to give electron binding energies in good agreement to experimentally derived excitation spectra. For paramagnetic NiO and CoO, we analyze the effect of rock-salt and zincblende structures and their different ligand fields on the spectral functions. By varying the value of the interaction parameter U, different correlation strengths among the transition-metal 3d electrons are considered, as well as the effect of additionally accounting for correlations in the oxygen 2p orbitals by a self-interaction-correction pseudopotential scheme.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT to paramagnetic NiO and CoO in rock-salt (octahedral ligand field) and zincblende (tetrahedral ligand field) structures. It examines the influence of these structural differences on the spectral functions by explicitly varying the Hubbard U parameter for transition-metal 3d electrons and by incorporating a self-interaction-correction (SIC) pseudopotential scheme to treat correlations in the oxygen 2p orbitals. The central claim is that this setup isolates ligand-field effects on the electronic structure while maintaining agreement with experimental excitation spectra.

Significance. If the quantitative results hold, the work provides a useful isolation of ligand-field geometry effects on correlation-driven spectral features in these canonical Mott insulators. The charge-self-consistent DFT+DMFT framework and the explicit variation of U are strengths; the inclusion of an SIC treatment for O 2p orbitals is a reasonable step toward capturing charge-transfer physics. Such comparisons between isochemical compounds in different coordinations can inform broader understanding of structure–correlation interplay in 3d oxides.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods and Results (zincblende CoO/NiO panels)] The manuscript states that the chosen U range and SIC pseudopotential 'sufficiently capture the relevant physics' (abstract and methods), yet provides no direct benchmark of the SIC scheme against full O 2p DMFT or against measured charge-transfer energies for the zincblende phases. If the SIC over- or under-corrects the O 2p position, the reported differences in spectral functions between rock-salt and zincblende structures cannot be unambiguously attributed to ligand field alone.
  2. [Results section, spectral-function figures] While U is varied explicitly, the paper does not report a systematic table or plot of key observables (gap size, satellite position, d-band width) versus U for the zincblende structures. Without this, it is difficult to separate the ligand-field contribution from the correlation-strength dependence that is already known to be strong in these materials.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts 'good agreement to experimentally derived excitation spectra' without quoting specific numbers (e.g., gap values or peak positions) or referencing the corresponding figures; adding one or two quantitative statements would improve clarity.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions should explicitly label the U values, the presence/absence of SIC, and the structure (rock-salt vs. zincblende) for each curve to allow immediate visual comparison.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Methods and Results (zincblende CoO/NiO panels)] The manuscript states that the chosen U range and SIC pseudopotential 'sufficiently capture the relevant physics' (abstract and methods), yet provides no direct benchmark of the SIC scheme against full O 2p DMFT or against measured charge-transfer energies for the zincblende phases. If the SIC over- or under-corrects the O 2p position, the reported differences in spectral functions between rock-salt and zincblende structures cannot be unambiguously attributed to ligand field alone.

    Authors: We acknowledge the value of a direct benchmark against full O 2p DMFT. Such calculations are, however, computationally demanding and lie outside the scope of the present study, which employs the established charge-self-consistent DFT+DMFT framework with SIC for oxygen. The SIC pseudopotential has been validated in earlier work on the rock-salt phases, and we apply the identical scheme to both structures to isolate the ligand-field contribution. Experimental charge-transfer data for the zincblende phases are limited because these are not the equilibrium structures. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph in the Methods section that explicitly discusses the approximations and limitations of the SIC treatment and their possible influence on the reported spectral differences. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results section, spectral-function figures] While U is varied explicitly, the paper does not report a systematic table or plot of key observables (gap size, satellite position, d-band width) versus U for the zincblende structures. Without this, it is difficult to separate the ligand-field contribution from the correlation-strength dependence that is already known to be strong in these materials.

    Authors: We agree that a compact summary of quantitative trends would make the separation of ligand-field and correlation effects more transparent. Although the spectral functions for several U values are already shown for the zincblende structures, we have now added a new table (Table II) that tabulates the fundamental gap, the energy of the main satellite feature, and the d-band width for both rock-salt and zincblende NiO and CoO as functions of U. This addition allows readers to directly compare the U dependence across the two ligand fields. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct outputs of parameter-varied DFT+DMFT computations

full rationale

The paper applies charge-self-consistent DFT+DMFT to compute spectral functions for NiO and CoO in rock-salt vs. zincblende structures, explicitly varying the input parameter U on TM 3d orbitals and applying an SIC pseudopotential scheme for O 2p. No derivation chain reduces the reported spectral functions, gaps, or ligand-field differences to fitted quantities or self-defined inputs by construction. U is varied as an external parameter rather than derived from the outputs, and the structural comparisons are obtained by direct application of the method to the target systems. Any self-citations support the established DFT+DMFT framework but are not load-bearing for the central claims, which rest on the computed differences across structures and U values. The analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as experimental spectra.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard assumptions of DFT and DMFT plus the empirical choice of U; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • U
    On-site Coulomb interaction parameter for transition-metal 3d electrons, varied to explore different correlation strengths.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT yields electron binding energies in good agreement with experimentally derived excitation spectra for these compounds.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify the method choice.
  • domain assumption The self-interaction-correction pseudopotential scheme adequately captures oxygen 2p correlations.
    Used to extend the standard treatment without further justification in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5456 in / 1559 out tokens · 66182 ms · 2026-05-07T04:00:29.548176+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 72 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Metal-insulator transitions,

    M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, “Metal-insulator transitions,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 70, p. 1039, 1998

  2. [2]

    Tokura and N

    Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, “Orbital physics in transition-metal oxides,” Science, vol. 288, p. 462, 2000, doi: 10.1126/science.288.5465.462

  3. [3]

    The exciting world of orbitals,

    S.-W. Cheong, “The exciting world of orbitals,” Nat. Mater., vol. 6, p. 927, 2007, doi: 10.1126/science.1149338

  4. [4]

    Designing and controlling the properties of transition metal oxide quantum materials,

    C. Ahn, A. Cavalleri, A. Georges, S. Ismail-Beigi, A. J. Millis, and J. M. Triscone, “Designing and controlling the properties of transition metal oxide quantum materials,” Nat. Mater., vol. 20, p. 1462, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-00989-2

  5. [5]

    Spin-entropy induced thermopower and spin-blockade effect in CoO,

    D. S. Negi, D. Singh, P. A. Van Aken, and R. Ahuja, “Spin-entropy induced thermopower and spin-blockade effect in CoO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 144108, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144108

  6. [6]

    An approach to emerging optical and optoelectronic applications based on NiO micro- And nanostructures,

    M. Taeño, D. Maestre, and A. Cremades, “An approach to emerging optical and optoelectronic applications based on NiO micro- And nanostructures,” Nanophot., vol. 10, p. 1785, 2021, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0041

  7. [7]

    Nickel Oxide/Graphene Composites: Synthesis and Applications,

    Y. Liu, C. Gao, Q. Li, and H. Pang, “Nickel Oxide/Graphene Composites: Synthesis and Applications,” Chem. Eur. J., vol. 25, p. 2141, 2019, doi: 10.1002/chem.201803982

  8. [8]

    Efficient CoO nanowire array photocatalysts for H2 generation,

    X. Zhan et al., “Efficient CoO nanowire array photocatalysts for H2 generation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 105, p. 153903, 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4898681

  9. [9]

    Cobalt oxide as photocatalyst for water splitting: Temperature-dependent phase structures,

    S. N. F. Moridon, M. I. Salehmin, M. A. Mohamed, K. Arifin, L. J. Minggu, and M. B. Kassim, “Cobalt oxide as photocatalyst for water splitting: Temperature-dependent phase structures,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energ., vol. 44, p. 25495, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.075

  10. [10]

    A new synthetic approach to cobalt oxides: Designed phase transformation for electrochemical water splitting,

    H. Jung et al., “A new synthetic approach to cobalt oxides: Designed phase transformation for electrochemical water splitting,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 415, p. 127958, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127958

  11. [11]

    Zinc Blende CoO as an Efficient CO Nondissociative Adsorption Site for Direct Synthesis of Higher Alcohols from Syngas,

    Z. Li et al., “Zinc Blende CoO as an Efficient CO Nondissociative Adsorption Site for Direct Synthesis of Higher Alcohols from Syngas,” ACS Catal., vol. 14, p. 2181, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c05579

  12. [12]

    Charge-transfer-energy-dependent oxygen evolution reaction mechanisms for perovskite oxides,

    W. T. Hong et al., “Charge-transfer-energy-dependent oxygen evolution reaction mechanisms for perovskite oxides,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 10, p. 2190, 2017, doi: 10.1039/c7ee02052j

  13. [13]

    Strongly Correlated Materials: Insights From Dynamical Mean-Field Theory,

    G. Kotliar and D. Vollhardt, “Strongly Correlated Materials: Insights From Dynamical Mean-Field Theory,” Phys. Today, vol. 57, p. 53, 2004, doi: 10.1063/1.1712502

  14. [14]

    Electronic structure of 3d-transition-metal oxides: On-site Coulomb repulsion versus covalency,

    R. Zimmermann et al., “Electronic structure of 3d-transition-metal oxides: On-site Coulomb repulsion versus covalency,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 11, p. 1657, 1999, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/11/7/002

  15. [15]

    Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds,

    J. Zaanen, G. A. Sawatzky, and J. W. Allen, “Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 55, p. 418, 1985, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.418

  16. [16]

    Electronic structure of Mott-Hubbard-type transition-metal oxides,

    A. Fujimori et al., “Electronic structure of Mott-Hubbard-type transition-metal oxides,” J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., vol. 117–118, p. 277, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0368- 2048(01)00253-5

  17. [17]

    Character of the insulating state in NiO: A mixture of charge-transfer and Mott-Hubbard character,

    T. M. Schuler, D. L. Ederer, S. Itza-Ortiz, G. T. Woods, T. A. Callcott, and J. C. Woicik, “Character of the insulating state in NiO: A mixture of charge-transfer and Mott-Hubbard character,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 71, p. 115113, 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.115113

  18. [18]

    Photoemission study of CoO,

    Z.-X. Shen et al., “Photoemission study of CoO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 42, p. 1817, 1990

  19. [19]

    Electronic Structure of CoO, Li-doped CoO, and LiCoO2,

    J. van Elp et al., “Electronic Structure of CoO, Li-doped CoO, and LiCoO2,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 44, p. 6090, 1991

  20. [20]

    First-principles calculations of dynamical screened interactions for the transition metal oxides MO (M=Mn, Fe, Co, Ni),

    R. Sakuma and F. Aryasetiawan, “First-principles calculations of dynamical screened interactions for the transition metal oxides MO (M=Mn, Fe, Co, Ni),” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, p. 165118, 2013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165118

  21. [21]

    First- principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: dynamical mean-field theory,

    V. I. Anisimov, A. I. Poteryaev, M. A. Korotin, A. O. Anokhin, and G. Kotliar, “First- principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: dynamical mean-field theory,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 9, p. 7359, 1997, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/9/4/002

  22. [22]

    Dynamical mean-field theory using Wannier functions: A flexible route to electronic structure calculations of strongly correlated materials,

    F. Lechermann et al., “Dynamical mean-field theory using Wannier functions: A flexible route to electronic structure calculations of strongly correlated materials,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 74, p. 125120, 2006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.125120

  23. [23]

    Local correlations and hole doping in NiO: A dynamical mean-field study,

    J. Kuneš, V. I. Anisimov, A. V. Lukoyanov, and D. Vollhardt, “Local correlations and hole doping in NiO: A dynamical mean-field study,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 75, p. 165115, 2007, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.165115

  24. [24]

    Consistent LDA’ + DMFT approach to the electronic structure of transition metal oxides: Charge transfer insulators and correlated metals,

    I. A. Nekrasov, N. S. Pavlov, and M. V. Sadovskii, “Consistent LDA’ + DMFT approach to the electronic structure of transition metal oxides: Charge transfer insulators and correlated metals,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys., vol. 116, p. 620, 2013, doi: 10.1134/S1063776113030126

  25. [25]

    LDA+DMFT approach to core-level spectroscopy: Application to 3d transition metal compounds,

    A. Hariki, T. Uozumi, and J. Kuneš, “LDA+DMFT approach to core-level spectroscopy: Application to 3d transition metal compounds,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, p. 045111, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.045111

  26. [26]

    Insulating gap in the transition-metal oxides: A calculation using the local-spin-density approximation with the on-site Coulomb U correlation correction,

    P. Wei and Z. Qing Qi, “Insulating gap in the transition-metal oxides: A calculation using the local-spin-density approximation with the on-site Coulomb U correlation correction,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 49, p. 10864, 1994

  27. [27]

    DFT, L(S)DA, LDA+U, LDA+DMFT, …, whether we do approach to a proper description of optical response for strongly correlated systems?,

    A. S. Moskvin, “DFT, L(S)DA, LDA+U, LDA+DMFT, …, whether we do approach to a proper description of optical response for strongly correlated systems?,” Opt. Spectrosc., vol. 121, p. 467, 2016, doi: 10.1134/S0030400X16100167

  28. [28]

    Systematic beyond-DFT study of binary transition metal oxides,

    S. Mandal, K. Haule, K. M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, “Systematic beyond-DFT study of binary transition metal oxides,” npj Comp. Mater., vol. 5, p. 115, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41524-019-0251-7

  29. [29]

    Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions,

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, “Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 68, p. 13, 1996, doi: 10.1007/s12031-008-9042-1

  30. [30]

    Self-interaction and relaxation-corrected pseudopotentials for II-VI semiconductors,

    D. Vogel, P. Krüger, and J. Pollmann, “Self-interaction and relaxation-corrected pseudopotentials for II-VI semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 54, p. 5495, 1996

  31. [31]

    First-principles density functional study of dopant elements at grain boundaries in ZnO,

    W. Körner and C. Elsässer, “First-principles density functional study of dopant elements at grain boundaries in ZnO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 81, p. 085324, 2010, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085324

  32. [32]

    Interplay of charge-transfer and Mott-Hubbard physics approached by an efficient combination of self-interaction correction and dynamical mean-field theory,

    F. Lechermann, W. Körner, D. F. Urban, and C. Elsässer, “Interplay of charge-transfer and Mott-Hubbard physics approached by an efficient combination of self-interaction correction and dynamical mean-field theory,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 115125, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115125

  33. [33]

    Importance of ligand on-site interactions for the description of Mott-insulators in DFT+DMFT,

    A. Carta, A. Panda, and C. Ederer, “Importance of ligand on-site interactions for the description of Mott-insulators in DFT+DMFT,” npj Comp. Mater., vol. 12, p. 57, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41524-025-01928-4

  34. [34]

    Kotliar, S

    G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, and C. A. Marianetti, “Electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 78, p. 865, 2006, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.865

  35. [35]

    Construction and solution of a Wannier-functions based Hamiltonian in the pseudopotential plane-wave framework for strongly correlated materials,

    D. Korotin et al., “Construction and solution of a Wannier-functions based Hamiltonian in the pseudopotential plane-wave framework for strongly correlated materials,” Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 65, p. 91, 2008, doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00326-3

  36. [36]

    Investigation of real materials with strong electronic correlations by the LDA+DMFT method,

    V. I. Anisimov and A. V. Lukoyanov, “Investigation of real materials with strong electronic correlations by the LDA+DMFT method,” Acta Cryst., vol. C70, p. 137, 2014, doi: 10.1107/S2053229613032312

  37. [37]

    Plane-wave based electronic structure calculations for correlated materials using dynamical mean-field theory and projected local orbitals,

    B. Amadon, F. Lechermann, A. Georges, F. Jollet, T. O. Wehling, and A. I. Lichtenstein, “Plane-wave based electronic structure calculations for correlated materials using dynamical mean-field theory and projected local orbitals,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 77, p. 205112, 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.205112

  38. [38]

    Relativistic effects on ground state properties of 4d and 5d transition metals,

    C. Elsässer, N. Takeuchi, K. M. Ho, C. T. Chan, P. Braun, and M. Fähnle, “Relativistic effects on ground state properties of 4d and 5d transition metals,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 2, p. 4371, 1990, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/2/19/006

  39. [39]

    FORTRAN 90 Program for Mixed- Basis-Pseudopotential Calculations for Crystals,

    B. Meyer, C. Elsässer, F. Lechermann, and M. Fähnle, “FORTRAN 90 Program for Mixed- Basis-Pseudopotential Calculations for Crystals,” Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Stuttgart (unpublished)

  40. [40]

    Computing total energies in complex materials using charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT,

    H. Park, A. J. Millis, and C. A. Marianetti, “Computing total energies in complex materials using charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 90, p. 235103, 2014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.235103

  41. [41]

    Self-energy self-consistent density functional theory plus dynamical mean field theory,

    S. Bhandary and K. Held, “Self-energy self-consistent density functional theory plus dynamical mean field theory,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, p. 245116, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.245116

  42. [42]

    Charge self-consistent electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory using Quantum ESPRESSO, Wannier 90 and TRIQS,

    S. Beck, A. Hampel, O. Parcollet, C. Ederer, and A. Georges, “Charge self-consistent electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory using Quantum ESPRESSO, Wannier 90 and TRIQS,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 34, p. 235601, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac5d1c

  43. [43]

    Kondo screening in Co adatoms with full Coulomb interaction,

    A. Valli, M. P. Bahlke, A. Kowalski, M. Karolak, C. Herrmann, and G. Sangiovanni, “Kondo screening in Co adatoms with full Coulomb interaction,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 2, p. 033432, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033432

  44. [44]

    Density- functional theory and NiO photoemission spectra,

    V. I. Anisimov, I. V. Solovyev, M. A. Korotin, M. T. Czyzyk, and G. A. Sawatzky, “Density- functional theory and NiO photoemission spectra,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 48, p. 16929, 1993, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.16929

  45. [45]

    Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators,

    A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, “Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 52, p. R5467, 1995

  46. [46]

    Magnetic collapse and the behavior of transition metal oxides at high pressure,

    I. Leonov, L. Pourovskii, A. Georges, and I. A. Abrikosov, “Magnetic collapse and the behavior of transition metal oxides at high pressure,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 94, p. 155135, 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155135

  47. [47]

    Pressure dependence of dynamically screened Coulomb interactions in NiO: Effective Hubbard, Hund, intershell, and intersite components,

    S. K. Panda, H. Jiang, and S. Biermann, “Pressure dependence of dynamically screened Coulomb interactions in NiO: Effective Hubbard, Hund, intershell, and intersite components,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, p. 045137, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.045137

  48. [48]

    DFT+DMFT calculations of the complex band and tunneling behavior for the transition metal monoxides MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO,

    L. Zhang et al., “DFT+DMFT calculations of the complex band and tunneling behavior for the transition metal monoxides MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 035104, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.035104

  49. [49]

    Density functional theory study of dopants in polycrystalline TiO2,

    W. Körner and C. Elsässer, “Density functional theory study of dopants in polycrystalline TiO2,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 83, p. 205315, 2011, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.205315

  50. [50]

    Analysis of electronic subgap states in amorphous semiconductor oxides based on the example of Zn-Sn-O systems,

    W. Körner, P. Gumbsch, and C. Elsässer, “Analysis of electronic subgap states in amorphous semiconductor oxides based on the example of Zn-Sn-O systems,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, p. 165210, 2012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.165210

  51. [51]

    Mechanisms for p -type behavior of ZnO, Zn1- xMgx O, and related oxide semiconductors,

    D. F. Urban, W. Körner, and C. Elsässer, “Mechanisms for p -type behavior of ZnO, Zn1- xMgx O, and related oxide semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 94, p. 075140, 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075140

  52. [52]

    TRIQS/CTHYB: A continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo hybridisation expansion solver for quantum impurity problems,

    P. Seth, I. Krivenko, M. Ferrero, and O. Parcollet, “TRIQS/CTHYB: A continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo hybridisation expansion solver for quantum impurity problems,” Comp. Phys. Commun., vol. 200, p. 274, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.10.023

  53. [53]

    Bayesian inference and the analytic continuation of imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo data,

    M. Jarrell and J. E. Gubernatis, “Bayesian inference and the analytic continuation of imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo data,” Phys. Rep., vol. 269, p. 133, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(95)00074-7

  54. [54]

    Characterization of NiO-Al2O3 composite and its conductivity in biogas for solid oxide fuel cell,

    S. P. Patil, L. D. Jadhav, D. P. Dubal, and V. R. Puri, “Characterization of NiO-Al2O3 composite and its conductivity in biogas for solid oxide fuel cell,” Mater. Sci.-Pol., vol. 34, p. 266, 2016, doi: 10.1515/msp-2016-0045

  55. [55]

    Ferromagnetic multipods fabricated by solution phase synthesis and hydrogen reduction,

    Y. C. Sui, Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, S. Jaswal, X. Z. Li, and D. J. Sellmyer, “Ferromagnetic multipods fabricated by solution phase synthesis and hydrogen reduction,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 43, p. 3115, 2007, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2007.894204

  56. [56]

    Physical Review B , author =

    H. Monkhorst and J. Pack, “Special points for Brillouin zone integrations,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 13, p. 5188, 1976, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188

  57. [57]

    DFT+DMFT study of spin-charge-lattice coupling in covalent LaCoO3,

    H. Park, R. Nanguneri, and A. T. Ngo, “DFT+DMFT study of spin-charge-lattice coupling in covalent LaCoO3,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 101, p. 195125, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.195125

  58. [58]

    Tetragonal elongation in CoO near the Néel point,

    M. D. Rechtin and B. L. Averbach, “Tetragonal elongation in CoO near the Néel point,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 26, p. 1483, 1971, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.1483

  59. [59]

    Direct Observation of Defect-Induced Surface Covalency in Ionic CoO (100),

    S.-P. Jeng and V. E. Henrich, “Direct Observation of Defect-Induced Surface Covalency in Ionic CoO (100),” Solid State Commun., vol. 75, p. 1013, 1990

  60. [60]

    Valence-band electronic structure of Co3O4 epitaxy on CoO(100),

    M. A. Langell, M. D. Anderson, G. A. Carson, L. Peng, and S. Smith, “Valence-band electronic structure of Co3O4 epitaxy on CoO(100),” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 59, p. 4791, 1999, doi: 10.3166/acsm.40.103-109

  61. [61]

    Electronic structure investigation of CoO by means of soft x-ray scattering,

    M. Magnuson, S. M. Butorin, J. H. Guo, and J. Nordgren, “Electronic structure investigation of CoO by means of soft x-ray scattering,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 65, p. 205106, 2002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.205106

  62. [62]

    Electron energy loss spectroscopic investigation of Co metal, CoO, and Co3O4 before and after Ar+ bombardment,

    H. A. E. Hagelin-Weaver, G. B. Hoflund, D. M. Minahan, and G. N. Salaita, “Electron energy loss spectroscopic investigation of Co metal, CoO, and Co3O4 before and after Ar+ bombardment,” Appl. Surf. Sci., no. 235, p. 420, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.02.062

  63. [63]

    Emergence of quantum critical charge and spin-state fluctuations near the pressure-induced Mott transition in MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO,

    I. Leonov, A. O. Shorikov, V. I. Anisimov, and I. A. Abrikosov, “Emergence of quantum critical charge and spin-state fluctuations near the pressure-induced Mott transition in MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 101, p. 245144, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.245144

  64. [64]

    Magnitude and origin of the band gap in NiO,

    G. A. Sawatzky and J. W. Allen, “Magnitude and origin of the band gap in NiO,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 53, p. 2339, 1984, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2339

  65. [65]

    Electronic structures of NiO, CoO, and FeO studied by 2p core-level x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,

    G. Lee and S. J. Oh, “Electronic structures of NiO, CoO, and FeO studied by 2p core-level x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 43, p. 14674, 1991, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.14674

  66. [66]

    Oxygen x-ray emission and absorption spectra as a probe of the electronic structure of strongly correlated oxides,

    E. Z. Kurmaev, R. G. Wilks, A. Moewes, L. D. Finkelstein, S. N. Shamin, and J. Kuneš, “Oxygen x-ray emission and absorption spectra as a probe of the electronic structure of strongly correlated oxides,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 77, p. 165127, 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.165127

  67. [67]

    LDA+DMFT study of magnetic transition and metallization in CoO under pressure,

    A. A. Dyachenko, A. O. Shorikov, A. V. Lukoyanov, and V. I. Anisimov, “LDA+DMFT study of magnetic transition and metallization in CoO under pressure,” JETP Lett., vol. 96, p. 56, 2012, doi: 10.1134/S002136401213005X

  68. [68]

    Pressure-driven orbital selective insulator-to-metal transition and spin-state crossover in cubic CoO,

    L. Huang, Y. Wang, and X. Dai, “Pressure-driven orbital selective insulator-to-metal transition and spin-state crossover in cubic CoO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 85, p. 245110, 2012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245110

  69. [69]

    B. N. Figgis and M. A. Hitchman, Ligand Field Theory and its Applications. Wiley-VCH, 2000

  70. [70]

    Electronic Structure of the 3d Transition-Matal Monoxides. II. Interpretation,

    L. F. Mattheiss, “Electronic Structure of the 3d Transition-Matal Monoxides. II. Interpretation,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 5, p. 306, 1972

  71. [71]

    Multielectron satellites and spin polarization in photoemission from Ni compounds,

    A. Fujimori, F. Minami, and S. Sugano, “Multielectron satellites and spin polarization in photoemission from Ni compounds,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 29, p. 5225, 1984, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.29.5225

  72. [72]

    Electronic structure of NiO and related 3d-transition-metal compounds,

    S. Hüfner, “Electronic structure of NiO and related 3d-transition-metal compounds,” Adv. Phys., vol. 43, p. 183, 1994, doi: 10.1080/00018739400101495

  73. [73]

    Ligand-Field Theory,

    J. S. Griffith and L. E. Orgel, “Ligand-Field Theory,” Q. Rev. Chem. Soc., vol. 11, p. 381, 1957, doi: 10.1039/QR9571100381

  74. [74]

    X-ray-photoelectron spectroscopic studies of the electronic structure of CoO,

    K. S. Kim, “X-ray-photoelectron spectroscopic studies of the electronic structure of CoO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 11, p. 2177, 1975, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.11.2177

  75. [75]

    Ab initio study of local d-d excitations in bulk CoO, at the CoO(100) surface, and in octahedral Co2+ complexes,

    S. Shi and V. Staemmler, “Ab initio study of local d-d excitations in bulk CoO, at the CoO(100) surface, and in octahedral Co2+ complexes,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 52, p. 12345, 1995, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.12345

  76. [76]

    Origin of antiferromagnetism in CoO: A density functional theory study,

    H. X. Deng, J. Li, S. S. Li, J. B. Xia, A. Walsh, and S. H. Wei, “Origin of antiferromagnetism in CoO: A density functional theory study,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 96, p. 162508, 2010, doi: 10.1063/1.3402772

  77. [77]

    Optical Absorption of CoO and MnO above and below the Néel Temperature,

    G. W. Pratt Jr. and R. Coelho, “Optical Absorption of CoO and MnO above and below the Néel Temperature,” Phys. Rev., vol. 116, p. 281, 1959

  78. [78]

    Cobaltous oxide with the zinc blende/wurtzite-type crystal structure,

    M. J. Redman and E. G. Steward, “Cobaltous oxide with the zinc blende/wurtzite-type crystal structure,” Nature, vol. 193, p. 867, 1962, doi: 10.1038/193867a0

  79. [79]

    Energetics of Cobalt(II) Oxide with the Zinc-Blende Structure,

    J. Dicarlo and A. Navrotskyf, “Energetics of Cobalt(II) Oxide with the Zinc-Blende Structure,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 76, p. 2465, 1993

  80. [80]

    Nickel oxide films with the zinc blende-type structure – A re-evaluation of X- ray diffraction data,

    D. Fischer, “Nickel oxide films with the zinc blende-type structure – A re-evaluation of X- ray diffraction data,” Mater. Today Comm., vol. 41, p. 110681, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110681

Showing first 80 references.