Recognition: unknown
Influence of ligand field and correlation on the electronic structure of NiO and CoO from DFT+DMFT calculations
Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 04:00 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Ligand fields from rock-salt and zincblende structures shape spectral functions in paramagnetic NiO and CoO as U varies.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
For paramagnetic NiO and CoO, the spectral functions depend on the ligand field set by rock-salt versus zincblende structures and on the correlation strength among the transition-metal 3d electrons as set by the interaction parameter U, with further changes when correlations in the oxygen 2p orbitals are included via a self-interaction-correction pseudopotential scheme.
What carries the argument
Charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT calculations performed on different crystal structures, with tunable U for 3d electrons and a self-interaction-correction pseudopotential for oxygen 2p orbitals, used to obtain spectral functions.
Load-bearing premise
The calculations assume that chosen values of U and the self-interaction-correction pseudopotential for oxygen 2p orbitals adequately capture the relevant correlations without requiring more advanced treatments such as full charge self-consistency or explicit inclusion of other orbitals.
What would settle it
Experimental photoemission spectra measured on zincblende-structured NiO or CoO that fail to exhibit the predicted differences in peak positions and weights relative to the rock-salt phase would refute the claimed influence of the ligand field.
read the original abstract
The intriguing physics and rich application potential of strongly correlated first-row transition metal oxide compounds result from the complex interplay of several factors that influence the electronic structure. To shed light on the effect of composition, structure, and correlation strength, we apply a well-established charge self-consistent combination of density functional theory and dynamical mean field theory, which has proven to give electron binding energies in good agreement to experimentally derived excitation spectra. For paramagnetic NiO and CoO, we analyze the effect of rock-salt and zincblende structures and their different ligand fields on the spectral functions. By varying the value of the interaction parameter U, different correlation strengths among the transition-metal 3d electrons are considered, as well as the effect of additionally accounting for correlations in the oxygen 2p orbitals by a self-interaction-correction pseudopotential scheme.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript applies charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT to paramagnetic NiO and CoO in rock-salt (octahedral ligand field) and zincblende (tetrahedral ligand field) structures. It examines the influence of these structural differences on the spectral functions by explicitly varying the Hubbard U parameter for transition-metal 3d electrons and by incorporating a self-interaction-correction (SIC) pseudopotential scheme to treat correlations in the oxygen 2p orbitals. The central claim is that this setup isolates ligand-field effects on the electronic structure while maintaining agreement with experimental excitation spectra.
Significance. If the quantitative results hold, the work provides a useful isolation of ligand-field geometry effects on correlation-driven spectral features in these canonical Mott insulators. The charge-self-consistent DFT+DMFT framework and the explicit variation of U are strengths; the inclusion of an SIC treatment for O 2p orbitals is a reasonable step toward capturing charge-transfer physics. Such comparisons between isochemical compounds in different coordinations can inform broader understanding of structure–correlation interplay in 3d oxides.
major comments (2)
- [Methods and Results (zincblende CoO/NiO panels)] The manuscript states that the chosen U range and SIC pseudopotential 'sufficiently capture the relevant physics' (abstract and methods), yet provides no direct benchmark of the SIC scheme against full O 2p DMFT or against measured charge-transfer energies for the zincblende phases. If the SIC over- or under-corrects the O 2p position, the reported differences in spectral functions between rock-salt and zincblende structures cannot be unambiguously attributed to ligand field alone.
- [Results section, spectral-function figures] While U is varied explicitly, the paper does not report a systematic table or plot of key observables (gap size, satellite position, d-band width) versus U for the zincblende structures. Without this, it is difficult to separate the ligand-field contribution from the correlation-strength dependence that is already known to be strong in these materials.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The abstract asserts 'good agreement to experimentally derived excitation spectra' without quoting specific numbers (e.g., gap values or peak positions) or referencing the corresponding figures; adding one or two quantitative statements would improve clarity.
- [Figure captions] Figure captions should explicitly label the U values, the presence/absence of SIC, and the structure (rock-salt vs. zincblende) for each curve to allow immediate visual comparison.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to improve clarity and strengthen the presentation of our results.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Methods and Results (zincblende CoO/NiO panels)] The manuscript states that the chosen U range and SIC pseudopotential 'sufficiently capture the relevant physics' (abstract and methods), yet provides no direct benchmark of the SIC scheme against full O 2p DMFT or against measured charge-transfer energies for the zincblende phases. If the SIC over- or under-corrects the O 2p position, the reported differences in spectral functions between rock-salt and zincblende structures cannot be unambiguously attributed to ligand field alone.
Authors: We acknowledge the value of a direct benchmark against full O 2p DMFT. Such calculations are, however, computationally demanding and lie outside the scope of the present study, which employs the established charge-self-consistent DFT+DMFT framework with SIC for oxygen. The SIC pseudopotential has been validated in earlier work on the rock-salt phases, and we apply the identical scheme to both structures to isolate the ligand-field contribution. Experimental charge-transfer data for the zincblende phases are limited because these are not the equilibrium structures. In the revised manuscript we have added a paragraph in the Methods section that explicitly discusses the approximations and limitations of the SIC treatment and their possible influence on the reported spectral differences. revision: partial
-
Referee: [Results section, spectral-function figures] While U is varied explicitly, the paper does not report a systematic table or plot of key observables (gap size, satellite position, d-band width) versus U for the zincblende structures. Without this, it is difficult to separate the ligand-field contribution from the correlation-strength dependence that is already known to be strong in these materials.
Authors: We agree that a compact summary of quantitative trends would make the separation of ligand-field and correlation effects more transparent. Although the spectral functions for several U values are already shown for the zincblende structures, we have now added a new table (Table II) that tabulates the fundamental gap, the energy of the main satellite feature, and the d-band width for both rock-salt and zincblende NiO and CoO as functions of U. This addition allows readers to directly compare the U dependence across the two ligand fields. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; results are direct outputs of parameter-varied DFT+DMFT computations
full rationale
The paper applies charge-self-consistent DFT+DMFT to compute spectral functions for NiO and CoO in rock-salt vs. zincblende structures, explicitly varying the input parameter U on TM 3d orbitals and applying an SIC pseudopotential scheme for O 2p. No derivation chain reduces the reported spectral functions, gaps, or ligand-field differences to fitted quantities or self-defined inputs by construction. U is varied as an external parameter rather than derived from the outputs, and the structural comparisons are obtained by direct application of the method to the target systems. Any self-citations support the established DFT+DMFT framework but are not load-bearing for the central claims, which rest on the computed differences across structures and U values. The analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as experimental spectra.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (1)
- U
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT yields electron binding energies in good agreement with experimentally derived excitation spectra for these compounds.
- domain assumption The self-interaction-correction pseudopotential scheme adequately captures oxygen 2p correlations.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Metal-insulator transitions,
M. Imada, A. Fujimori, and Y. Tokura, “Metal-insulator transitions,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 70, p. 1039, 1998
1998
-
[2]
Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, “Orbital physics in transition-metal oxides,” Science, vol. 288, p. 462, 2000, doi: 10.1126/science.288.5465.462
-
[3]
The exciting world of orbitals,
S.-W. Cheong, “The exciting world of orbitals,” Nat. Mater., vol. 6, p. 927, 2007, doi: 10.1126/science.1149338
-
[4]
Designing and controlling the properties of transition metal oxide quantum materials,
C. Ahn, A. Cavalleri, A. Georges, S. Ismail-Beigi, A. J. Millis, and J. M. Triscone, “Designing and controlling the properties of transition metal oxide quantum materials,” Nat. Mater., vol. 20, p. 1462, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-00989-2
-
[5]
Spin-entropy induced thermopower and spin-blockade effect in CoO,
D. S. Negi, D. Singh, P. A. Van Aken, and R. Ahuja, “Spin-entropy induced thermopower and spin-blockade effect in CoO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 144108, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.144108
-
[6]
M. Taeño, D. Maestre, and A. Cremades, “An approach to emerging optical and optoelectronic applications based on NiO micro- And nanostructures,” Nanophot., vol. 10, p. 1785, 2021, doi: 10.1515/nanoph-2021-0041
-
[7]
Nickel Oxide/Graphene Composites: Synthesis and Applications,
Y. Liu, C. Gao, Q. Li, and H. Pang, “Nickel Oxide/Graphene Composites: Synthesis and Applications,” Chem. Eur. J., vol. 25, p. 2141, 2019, doi: 10.1002/chem.201803982
-
[8]
Efficient CoO nanowire array photocatalysts for H2 generation,
X. Zhan et al., “Efficient CoO nanowire array photocatalysts for H2 generation,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 105, p. 153903, 2014, doi: 10.1063/1.4898681
-
[9]
Cobalt oxide as photocatalyst for water splitting: Temperature-dependent phase structures,
S. N. F. Moridon, M. I. Salehmin, M. A. Mohamed, K. Arifin, L. J. Minggu, and M. B. Kassim, “Cobalt oxide as photocatalyst for water splitting: Temperature-dependent phase structures,” Int. J. Hydrog. Energ., vol. 44, p. 25495, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.08.075
-
[10]
H. Jung et al., “A new synthetic approach to cobalt oxides: Designed phase transformation for electrochemical water splitting,” Chem. Eng. J., vol. 415, p. 127958, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127958
-
[11]
Z. Li et al., “Zinc Blende CoO as an Efficient CO Nondissociative Adsorption Site for Direct Synthesis of Higher Alcohols from Syngas,” ACS Catal., vol. 14, p. 2181, 2024, doi: 10.1021/acscatal.3c05579
-
[12]
Charge-transfer-energy-dependent oxygen evolution reaction mechanisms for perovskite oxides,
W. T. Hong et al., “Charge-transfer-energy-dependent oxygen evolution reaction mechanisms for perovskite oxides,” Energy Environ. Sci., vol. 10, p. 2190, 2017, doi: 10.1039/c7ee02052j
-
[13]
Strongly Correlated Materials: Insights From Dynamical Mean-Field Theory,
G. Kotliar and D. Vollhardt, “Strongly Correlated Materials: Insights From Dynamical Mean-Field Theory,” Phys. Today, vol. 57, p. 53, 2004, doi: 10.1063/1.1712502
-
[14]
Electronic structure of 3d-transition-metal oxides: On-site Coulomb repulsion versus covalency,
R. Zimmermann et al., “Electronic structure of 3d-transition-metal oxides: On-site Coulomb repulsion versus covalency,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 11, p. 1657, 1999, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/11/7/002
-
[15]
Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds,
J. Zaanen, G. A. Sawatzky, and J. W. Allen, “Band gaps and electronic structure of transition-metal compounds,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 55, p. 418, 1985, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.418
-
[16]
Electronic structure of Mott-Hubbard-type transition-metal oxides,
A. Fujimori et al., “Electronic structure of Mott-Hubbard-type transition-metal oxides,” J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom., vol. 117–118, p. 277, 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0368- 2048(01)00253-5
-
[17]
Character of the insulating state in NiO: A mixture of charge-transfer and Mott-Hubbard character,
T. M. Schuler, D. L. Ederer, S. Itza-Ortiz, G. T. Woods, T. A. Callcott, and J. C. Woicik, “Character of the insulating state in NiO: A mixture of charge-transfer and Mott-Hubbard character,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 71, p. 115113, 2005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.115113
-
[18]
Photoemission study of CoO,
Z.-X. Shen et al., “Photoemission study of CoO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 42, p. 1817, 1990
1990
-
[19]
Electronic Structure of CoO, Li-doped CoO, and LiCoO2,
J. van Elp et al., “Electronic Structure of CoO, Li-doped CoO, and LiCoO2,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 44, p. 6090, 1991
1991
-
[20]
R. Sakuma and F. Aryasetiawan, “First-principles calculations of dynamical screened interactions for the transition metal oxides MO (M=Mn, Fe, Co, Ni),” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 87, p. 165118, 2013, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.165118
-
[21]
V. I. Anisimov, A. I. Poteryaev, M. A. Korotin, A. O. Anokhin, and G. Kotliar, “First- principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: dynamical mean-field theory,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 9, p. 7359, 1997, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/9/4/002
-
[22]
F. Lechermann et al., “Dynamical mean-field theory using Wannier functions: A flexible route to electronic structure calculations of strongly correlated materials,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 74, p. 125120, 2006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.125120
-
[23]
Local correlations and hole doping in NiO: A dynamical mean-field study,
J. Kuneš, V. I. Anisimov, A. V. Lukoyanov, and D. Vollhardt, “Local correlations and hole doping in NiO: A dynamical mean-field study,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 75, p. 165115, 2007, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.75.165115
-
[24]
I. A. Nekrasov, N. S. Pavlov, and M. V. Sadovskii, “Consistent LDA’ + DMFT approach to the electronic structure of transition metal oxides: Charge transfer insulators and correlated metals,” J. Exp. Theor. Phys., vol. 116, p. 620, 2013, doi: 10.1134/S1063776113030126
-
[25]
LDA+DMFT approach to core-level spectroscopy: Application to 3d transition metal compounds,
A. Hariki, T. Uozumi, and J. Kuneš, “LDA+DMFT approach to core-level spectroscopy: Application to 3d transition metal compounds,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, p. 045111, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.045111
-
[26]
Insulating gap in the transition-metal oxides: A calculation using the local-spin-density approximation with the on-site Coulomb U correlation correction,
P. Wei and Z. Qing Qi, “Insulating gap in the transition-metal oxides: A calculation using the local-spin-density approximation with the on-site Coulomb U correlation correction,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 49, p. 10864, 1994
1994
-
[27]
A. S. Moskvin, “DFT, L(S)DA, LDA+U, LDA+DMFT, …, whether we do approach to a proper description of optical response for strongly correlated systems?,” Opt. Spectrosc., vol. 121, p. 467, 2016, doi: 10.1134/S0030400X16100167
-
[28]
Systematic beyond-DFT study of binary transition metal oxides,
S. Mandal, K. Haule, K. M. Rabe, and D. Vanderbilt, “Systematic beyond-DFT study of binary transition metal oxides,” npj Comp. Mater., vol. 5, p. 115, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41524-019-0251-7
-
[29]
A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, “Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 68, p. 13, 1996, doi: 10.1007/s12031-008-9042-1
-
[30]
Self-interaction and relaxation-corrected pseudopotentials for II-VI semiconductors,
D. Vogel, P. Krüger, and J. Pollmann, “Self-interaction and relaxation-corrected pseudopotentials for II-VI semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 54, p. 5495, 1996
1996
-
[31]
First-principles density functional study of dopant elements at grain boundaries in ZnO,
W. Körner and C. Elsässer, “First-principles density functional study of dopant elements at grain boundaries in ZnO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 81, p. 085324, 2010, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.81.085324
-
[32]
F. Lechermann, W. Körner, D. F. Urban, and C. Elsässer, “Interplay of charge-transfer and Mott-Hubbard physics approached by an efficient combination of self-interaction correction and dynamical mean-field theory,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 115125, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115125
-
[33]
Importance of ligand on-site interactions for the description of Mott-insulators in DFT+DMFT,
A. Carta, A. Panda, and C. Ederer, “Importance of ligand on-site interactions for the description of Mott-insulators in DFT+DMFT,” npj Comp. Mater., vol. 12, p. 57, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41524-025-01928-4
-
[34]
G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, V. S. Oudovenko, O. Parcollet, and C. A. Marianetti, “Electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory,” Rev. Mod. Phys., vol. 78, p. 865, 2006, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.78.865
-
[35]
D. Korotin et al., “Construction and solution of a Wannier-functions based Hamiltonian in the pseudopotential plane-wave framework for strongly correlated materials,” Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 65, p. 91, 2008, doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2008-00326-3
-
[36]
Investigation of real materials with strong electronic correlations by the LDA+DMFT method,
V. I. Anisimov and A. V. Lukoyanov, “Investigation of real materials with strong electronic correlations by the LDA+DMFT method,” Acta Cryst., vol. C70, p. 137, 2014, doi: 10.1107/S2053229613032312
-
[37]
B. Amadon, F. Lechermann, A. Georges, F. Jollet, T. O. Wehling, and A. I. Lichtenstein, “Plane-wave based electronic structure calculations for correlated materials using dynamical mean-field theory and projected local orbitals,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 77, p. 205112, 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.205112
-
[38]
Relativistic effects on ground state properties of 4d and 5d transition metals,
C. Elsässer, N. Takeuchi, K. M. Ho, C. T. Chan, P. Braun, and M. Fähnle, “Relativistic effects on ground state properties of 4d and 5d transition metals,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 2, p. 4371, 1990, doi: 10.1088/0953-8984/2/19/006
-
[39]
FORTRAN 90 Program for Mixed- Basis-Pseudopotential Calculations for Crystals,
B. Meyer, C. Elsässer, F. Lechermann, and M. Fähnle, “FORTRAN 90 Program for Mixed- Basis-Pseudopotential Calculations for Crystals,” Max-Planck-Institut für Metallforschung, Stuttgart (unpublished)
-
[40]
Computing total energies in complex materials using charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT,
H. Park, A. J. Millis, and C. A. Marianetti, “Computing total energies in complex materials using charge self-consistent DFT+DMFT,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 90, p. 235103, 2014, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.235103
-
[41]
Self-energy self-consistent density functional theory plus dynamical mean field theory,
S. Bhandary and K. Held, “Self-energy self-consistent density functional theory plus dynamical mean field theory,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 103, p. 245116, 2021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.245116
-
[42]
S. Beck, A. Hampel, O. Parcollet, C. Ederer, and A. Georges, “Charge self-consistent electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory using Quantum ESPRESSO, Wannier 90 and TRIQS,” J. Phys. Condens. Matter, vol. 34, p. 235601, 2022, doi: 10.1088/1361-648X/ac5d1c
-
[43]
Kondo screening in Co adatoms with full Coulomb interaction,
A. Valli, M. P. Bahlke, A. Kowalski, M. Karolak, C. Herrmann, and G. Sangiovanni, “Kondo screening in Co adatoms with full Coulomb interaction,” Phys. Rev. Res., vol. 2, p. 033432, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033432
-
[44]
Density- functional theory and NiO photoemission spectra,
V. I. Anisimov, I. V. Solovyev, M. A. Korotin, M. T. Czyzyk, and G. A. Sawatzky, “Density- functional theory and NiO photoemission spectra,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 48, p. 16929, 1993, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.48.16929
-
[45]
Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators,
A. I. Liechtenstein, V. I. Anisimov, and J. Zaanen, “Density-functional theory and strong interactions: Orbital ordering in Mott-Hubbard insulators,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 52, p. R5467, 1995
1995
-
[46]
Magnetic collapse and the behavior of transition metal oxides at high pressure,
I. Leonov, L. Pourovskii, A. Georges, and I. A. Abrikosov, “Magnetic collapse and the behavior of transition metal oxides at high pressure,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 94, p. 155135, 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.155135
-
[47]
S. K. Panda, H. Jiang, and S. Biermann, “Pressure dependence of dynamically screened Coulomb interactions in NiO: Effective Hubbard, Hund, intershell, and intersite components,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 96, p. 045137, 2017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.045137
-
[48]
L. Zhang et al., “DFT+DMFT calculations of the complex band and tunneling behavior for the transition metal monoxides MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 100, p. 035104, 2019, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.035104
-
[49]
Density functional theory study of dopants in polycrystalline TiO2,
W. Körner and C. Elsässer, “Density functional theory study of dopants in polycrystalline TiO2,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 83, p. 205315, 2011, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.205315
-
[50]
W. Körner, P. Gumbsch, and C. Elsässer, “Analysis of electronic subgap states in amorphous semiconductor oxides based on the example of Zn-Sn-O systems,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 86, p. 165210, 2012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.165210
-
[51]
Mechanisms for p -type behavior of ZnO, Zn1- xMgx O, and related oxide semiconductors,
D. F. Urban, W. Körner, and C. Elsässer, “Mechanisms for p -type behavior of ZnO, Zn1- xMgx O, and related oxide semiconductors,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 94, p. 075140, 2016, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.075140
-
[52]
P. Seth, I. Krivenko, M. Ferrero, and O. Parcollet, “TRIQS/CTHYB: A continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo hybridisation expansion solver for quantum impurity problems,” Comp. Phys. Commun., vol. 200, p. 274, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2015.10.023
-
[53]
Bayesian inference and the analytic continuation of imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo data,
M. Jarrell and J. E. Gubernatis, “Bayesian inference and the analytic continuation of imaginary-time quantum Monte Carlo data,” Phys. Rep., vol. 269, p. 133, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0370-1573(95)00074-7
-
[54]
Characterization of NiO-Al2O3 composite and its conductivity in biogas for solid oxide fuel cell,
S. P. Patil, L. D. Jadhav, D. P. Dubal, and V. R. Puri, “Characterization of NiO-Al2O3 composite and its conductivity in biogas for solid oxide fuel cell,” Mater. Sci.-Pol., vol. 34, p. 266, 2016, doi: 10.1515/msp-2016-0045
-
[55]
Ferromagnetic multipods fabricated by solution phase synthesis and hydrogen reduction,
Y. C. Sui, Y. Zhao, J. Zhang, S. Jaswal, X. Z. Li, and D. J. Sellmyer, “Ferromagnetic multipods fabricated by solution phase synthesis and hydrogen reduction,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 43, p. 3115, 2007, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2007.894204
-
[56]
H. Monkhorst and J. Pack, “Special points for Brillouin zone integrations,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 13, p. 5188, 1976, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188
-
[57]
DFT+DMFT study of spin-charge-lattice coupling in covalent LaCoO3,
H. Park, R. Nanguneri, and A. T. Ngo, “DFT+DMFT study of spin-charge-lattice coupling in covalent LaCoO3,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 101, p. 195125, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.195125
-
[58]
Tetragonal elongation in CoO near the Néel point,
M. D. Rechtin and B. L. Averbach, “Tetragonal elongation in CoO near the Néel point,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 26, p. 1483, 1971, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.1483
-
[59]
Direct Observation of Defect-Induced Surface Covalency in Ionic CoO (100),
S.-P. Jeng and V. E. Henrich, “Direct Observation of Defect-Induced Surface Covalency in Ionic CoO (100),” Solid State Commun., vol. 75, p. 1013, 1990
1990
-
[60]
Valence-band electronic structure of Co3O4 epitaxy on CoO(100),
M. A. Langell, M. D. Anderson, G. A. Carson, L. Peng, and S. Smith, “Valence-band electronic structure of Co3O4 epitaxy on CoO(100),” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 59, p. 4791, 1999, doi: 10.3166/acsm.40.103-109
-
[61]
Electronic structure investigation of CoO by means of soft x-ray scattering,
M. Magnuson, S. M. Butorin, J. H. Guo, and J. Nordgren, “Electronic structure investigation of CoO by means of soft x-ray scattering,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 65, p. 205106, 2002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.205106
-
[62]
H. A. E. Hagelin-Weaver, G. B. Hoflund, D. M. Minahan, and G. N. Salaita, “Electron energy loss spectroscopic investigation of Co metal, CoO, and Co3O4 before and after Ar+ bombardment,” Appl. Surf. Sci., no. 235, p. 420, 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.02.062
-
[63]
I. Leonov, A. O. Shorikov, V. I. Anisimov, and I. A. Abrikosov, “Emergence of quantum critical charge and spin-state fluctuations near the pressure-induced Mott transition in MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 101, p. 245144, 2020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.245144
-
[64]
Magnitude and origin of the band gap in NiO,
G. A. Sawatzky and J. W. Allen, “Magnitude and origin of the band gap in NiO,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 53, p. 2339, 1984, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2339
-
[65]
G. Lee and S. J. Oh, “Electronic structures of NiO, CoO, and FeO studied by 2p core-level x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 43, p. 14674, 1991, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.43.14674
-
[66]
E. Z. Kurmaev, R. G. Wilks, A. Moewes, L. D. Finkelstein, S. N. Shamin, and J. Kuneš, “Oxygen x-ray emission and absorption spectra as a probe of the electronic structure of strongly correlated oxides,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 77, p. 165127, 2008, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.165127
-
[67]
LDA+DMFT study of magnetic transition and metallization in CoO under pressure,
A. A. Dyachenko, A. O. Shorikov, A. V. Lukoyanov, and V. I. Anisimov, “LDA+DMFT study of magnetic transition and metallization in CoO under pressure,” JETP Lett., vol. 96, p. 56, 2012, doi: 10.1134/S002136401213005X
-
[68]
L. Huang, Y. Wang, and X. Dai, “Pressure-driven orbital selective insulator-to-metal transition and spin-state crossover in cubic CoO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 85, p. 245110, 2012, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.245110
-
[69]
B. N. Figgis and M. A. Hitchman, Ligand Field Theory and its Applications. Wiley-VCH, 2000
2000
-
[70]
Electronic Structure of the 3d Transition-Matal Monoxides. II. Interpretation,
L. F. Mattheiss, “Electronic Structure of the 3d Transition-Matal Monoxides. II. Interpretation,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 5, p. 306, 1972
1972
-
[71]
Multielectron satellites and spin polarization in photoemission from Ni compounds,
A. Fujimori, F. Minami, and S. Sugano, “Multielectron satellites and spin polarization in photoemission from Ni compounds,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 29, p. 5225, 1984, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.29.5225
-
[72]
Electronic structure of NiO and related 3d-transition-metal compounds,
S. Hüfner, “Electronic structure of NiO and related 3d-transition-metal compounds,” Adv. Phys., vol. 43, p. 183, 1994, doi: 10.1080/00018739400101495
-
[73]
J. S. Griffith and L. E. Orgel, “Ligand-Field Theory,” Q. Rev. Chem. Soc., vol. 11, p. 381, 1957, doi: 10.1039/QR9571100381
-
[74]
X-ray-photoelectron spectroscopic studies of the electronic structure of CoO,
K. S. Kim, “X-ray-photoelectron spectroscopic studies of the electronic structure of CoO,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 11, p. 2177, 1975, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.11.2177
-
[75]
S. Shi and V. Staemmler, “Ab initio study of local d-d excitations in bulk CoO, at the CoO(100) surface, and in octahedral Co2+ complexes,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 52, p. 12345, 1995, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.52.12345
-
[76]
Origin of antiferromagnetism in CoO: A density functional theory study,
H. X. Deng, J. Li, S. S. Li, J. B. Xia, A. Walsh, and S. H. Wei, “Origin of antiferromagnetism in CoO: A density functional theory study,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 96, p. 162508, 2010, doi: 10.1063/1.3402772
-
[77]
Optical Absorption of CoO and MnO above and below the Néel Temperature,
G. W. Pratt Jr. and R. Coelho, “Optical Absorption of CoO and MnO above and below the Néel Temperature,” Phys. Rev., vol. 116, p. 281, 1959
1959
-
[78]
Cobaltous oxide with the zinc blende/wurtzite-type crystal structure,
M. J. Redman and E. G. Steward, “Cobaltous oxide with the zinc blende/wurtzite-type crystal structure,” Nature, vol. 193, p. 867, 1962, doi: 10.1038/193867a0
-
[79]
Energetics of Cobalt(II) Oxide with the Zinc-Blende Structure,
J. Dicarlo and A. Navrotskyf, “Energetics of Cobalt(II) Oxide with the Zinc-Blende Structure,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 76, p. 2465, 1993
1993
-
[80]
Nickel oxide films with the zinc blende-type structure – A re-evaluation of X- ray diffraction data,
D. Fischer, “Nickel oxide films with the zinc blende-type structure – A re-evaluation of X- ray diffraction data,” Mater. Today Comm., vol. 41, p. 110681, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.110681
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.