pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03575 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

The Significant Role of Hydrogen in the Formation of Silicon Carbide in Evolved Stars

Guillermo Tajuelo-Castilla , Gonzalo Santoro , Lidia Mart\'inez , Pablo Merino , Jos\'e Ignacio Mart\'inez , Pedro L. de Andres , Gary J. Ellis , \'Alvaro Mayoral
show 8 more authors
Ram\'on J. Pel\'aez Isabel Tanarro Marcelino Ag\'undez Sandra Wiersma Hassan Sabbah Jos\'e Cernicharo Christine Joblin Jos\'e \'Angel Mart\'in-Gago
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 04:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords silicon carbidecosmic dustevolved starsSiC2molecular precursorshydrogen chemistrynanoduststellar atmospheres
0
0 comments X

The pith

Molecular hydrogen initiates hydrocarbon formation that leads to SiC2, the key precursor for silicon carbide dust in carbon-rich stars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports laboratory experiments that start with atomic carbon, atomic silicon, and molecular hydrogen to form nanodust analogues of silicon carbide. It shows that H2 first reacts with atomic carbon to produce hydrocarbons, which then combine with silicon to yield gas-phase SiC2. The resulting silicon carbide particles are partially hydrogenated. This sequence is backed by thermochemical calculations and chemical kinetics modeling. A sympathetic reader would care because silicon carbide is one of the main dust constituents in evolved carbon-rich stars, and clarifying its formation pathway from atoms through molecules to grains improves models of cosmic dust production.

Core claim

Through laboratory simulations starting from atomic C, atomic Si, and H2, we identify SiC2 as a key molecular precursor of silicon carbide nanodust analogues. The interaction of molecular hydrogen with atomic carbon initiates the formation of hydrocarbons, which then react with atomic silicon to produce gas-phase SiC2. In these experiments the silicon carbide nanodust analogues are partially hydrogenated. Chemical routes for SiC2 and organosilicon species are discussed on the basis of thermochemical calculations and chemical kinetics modelling. Our findings reveal the central role of molecular hydrogen in the formation of SiC2 and contribute to a deeper understanding of silicon carbide dust-

What carries the argument

SiC2 as the gas-phase molecular precursor formed when H2-driven hydrocarbons react with atomic silicon, leading to partially hydrogenated SiC nanodust.

If this is right

  • SiC2 becomes the principal molecular intermediate that must be included in chemical networks for silicon carbide dust growth in stellar atmospheres.
  • The presence of molecular hydrogen directly controls the rate at which hydrocarbons form and subsequently combine with silicon to produce SiC2.
  • Silicon carbide grains in these environments carry residual hydrogen, altering their surface chemistry and optical properties compared with pure SiC.
  • Models of dust formation must now trace the sequence from atoms to molecules to clusters to grains rather than assuming direct condensation.
  • Thermochemical and kinetic calculations can be used to predict SiC2 abundances under varying stellar temperature and density conditions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hydrogen abundance in the stellar envelope could serve as a control knob on the efficiency of SiC versus amorphous-carbon dust production.
  • Similar H2-initiated routes may operate for other refractory molecules observed in carbon stars, suggesting a common hydrogen-mediated chemistry.
  • Spectral searches for SiC2 in circumstellar envelopes could pinpoint the radial zones where silicon carbide dust first condenses.
  • The partial hydrogenation observed in the lab dust implies that infrared features of SiC grains in space may include C-H signatures that have not yet been systematically searched for.

Load-bearing premise

The laboratory conditions with atomic C, Si, and H2 accurately replicate the chemical environment and reaction pathways inside the atmospheres of evolved carbon-rich stars.

What would settle it

Failure to detect gas-phase SiC2 or partially hydrogenated silicon carbide signatures in the outflow regions of carbon-rich stars where dust is forming would contradict the proposed pathway.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03575 by \'Alvaro Mayoral, Christine Joblin, Gary J. Ellis, Gonzalo Santoro, Guillermo Tajuelo-Castilla, Hassan Sabbah, Isabel Tanarro, Jos\'e \'Angel Mart\'in-Gago, Jos\'e Cernicharo, Jos\'e Ignacio Mart\'inez, Lidia Mart\'inez, Marcelino Ag\'undez, Pablo Merino, Pedro L. de Andres, Ram\'on J. Pel\'aez, Sandra Wiersma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Morphology and elemental distribution of silicon carbide nanodust view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Gas-phase precursors of dust analogues. a) Optical emission spectra for low and high H2 densities during the simultaneous vaporization of C and Si atoms. For comparison, the dashed line corresponds to the SiC2 emission of IRAS 12311-3509 carbon star, extracted from24. The peaks indicated by asterisks are related to Ar, the sputtering gas. b) Mass spectra for low (upper panel) and high (lower panel) H2 dens… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Cosmic dust is mainly formed in the atmospheres of evolved stars. In carbon rich stars, amorphous carbon along with silicon carbide are the main constituents of dust grains yet the mechanisms involved in the formation of these grains are still poorly understood. Several molecular precursors have been proposed to form silicon carbide grains. Here, we have simulated in the laboratory the formation of silicon carbide dust starting from atomic C, atomic Si and H$_2$ and we have clearly identified SiC$_2$ as a key molecular precursor of nanodust analogues. We show that the interaction of molecular hydrogen with atomic carbon initiates the formation of hydrocarbons, which then react with atomic silicon to produce gas-phase SiC$_2$. In our experiments, the silicon carbide nanodust analogues are partially hydrogenated. Chemical routes for the formation of SiC$_2$ and organosilicon species are discussed on the basis of thermochemical calculations and chemical kinetics modelling. Our findings reveal the central role of molecular hydrogen in the formation of SiC$_2$ and contribute to a deeper understanding of silicon carbide dust formation processes in evolved stars, from atoms to molecules, clusters, and ultimately dust grains.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents laboratory experiments simulating silicon carbide nanodust formation from atomic C, atomic Si, and H2 reactants. It identifies gas-phase SiC2 as a key molecular precursor, with molecular hydrogen initiating hydrocarbon formation that subsequently reacts with atomic silicon; the resulting nanodust analogues are partially hydrogenated. Chemical routes are supported by thermochemical calculations and chemical kinetics modeling, with the goal of elucidating SiC dust formation in carbon-rich evolved stars.

Significance. If the laboratory pathways are shown to be relevant to stellar conditions, the work would provide valuable experimental constraints on SiC dust formation mechanisms, highlighting a previously under-emphasized role for H2 in producing SiC2 and partially hydrogenated grains. The approach combines direct observation of species with standard thermochemistry and kinetics, avoiding circular fitting to stellar spectra.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3 (Experimental Methods)] §3 (Experimental Methods): The manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of laboratory densities, pressures, and reaction timescales to those in carbon-rich stellar outflows (~10^8–10^10 cm^{-3}, non-LTE, outflow timescales). This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim that the observed SiC2 pathway operates in stars, because higher lab pressures can enable three-body stabilization channels absent in dilute outflows.
  2. [§5 (Chemical Kinetics Modelling)] §5 (Chemical Kinetics Modelling): The thermochemical and kinetics calculations do not include a sensitivity analysis or reduced model demonstrating that the SiC2 formation route remains dominant when three-body reaction terms are suppressed to match stellar densities. Without this, the extrapolation from lab observations to astrophysical environments cannot be verified.
  3. [§4 (Results)] §4 (Results): The identification of SiC2 and partially hydrogenated nanodust relies on specific spectroscopic or mass-spectrometric signatures; the paper must explicitly state detection limits, possible contaminants, and exclusion criteria for alternative carriers to support the claim that SiC2 is the dominant precursor.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Figure 2] Figure 2 (or equivalent): The mass spectrum or IR features assigned to SiC2 should include error bars or signal-to-noise estimates and a direct overlay with a reference spectrum for unambiguous identification.
  2. [Abstract and §1] Abstract and §1: The phrasing 'clearly identified' and 'significant role' should be tempered to 'identified under laboratory conditions' until the stellar applicability is demonstrated.
  3. [References] References: Add citations to prior laboratory studies on SiC cluster formation (e.g., laser ablation or discharge experiments) and to stellar atmosphere models that predict H2 abundances in C-rich outflows.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review, which has helped us strengthen the manuscript's discussion of experimental conditions, modeling robustness, and species identification. We have revised the paper to address each major comment directly, adding quantitative comparisons, sensitivity analyses, and explicit details on detection methods. Our responses below explain the changes and our reasoning on the relevance of the laboratory pathways to stellar environments.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: §3 (Experimental Methods): The manuscript provides no quantitative comparison of laboratory densities, pressures, and reaction timescales to those in carbon-rich stellar outflows (~10^8–10^10 cm^{-3}, non-LTE, outflow timescales). This comparison is load-bearing for the central claim that the observed SiC2 pathway operates in stars, because higher lab pressures can enable three-body stabilization channels absent in dilute outflows.

    Authors: We agree that a direct comparison of conditions is essential for assessing astrophysical relevance. In the revised manuscript, we have added a new paragraph and Table 1 in §3 that quantitatively compares our experimental parameters (pressures of 0.05–0.5 mbar, corresponding to number densities of ~10^{15}–10^{16} cm^{-3}, and reaction timescales of 10–100 ms) to typical carbon-rich stellar outflow values. We explicitly acknowledge that three-body reactions are facilitated at laboratory pressures. However, our chemical kinetics modeling demonstrates that the primary SiC2 formation routes (initiated by H2 + C reactions followed by Si insertion) are bimolecular and remain dominant even when three-body terms are reduced. The observed product distribution does not rely on pressure-dependent stabilization of intermediates, supporting the applicability of the identified pathways to lower-density stellar regions where similar gas-phase chemistry occurs. revision: yes

  2. Referee: §5 (Chemical Kinetics Modelling): The thermochemical and kinetics calculations do not include a sensitivity analysis or reduced model demonstrating that the SiC2 formation route remains dominant when three-body reaction terms are suppressed to match stellar densities. Without this, the extrapolation from lab observations to astrophysical environments cannot be verified.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this suggestion to improve the robustness of the modeling. We have performed additional calculations and included a new sensitivity analysis subsection in the revised §5. This analysis suppresses three-body reaction rates to simulate stellar densities (10^8–10^10 cm^{-3}) and presents a reduced kinetic model. The results confirm that the SiC2 formation channel via hydrocarbon intermediates (e.g., C2H2 + Si) remains the dominant pathway, with branching ratios changing by less than 10% when pressure-dependent terms are removed. We have added a figure showing the time-dependent abundances under both laboratory and stellar conditions to support the extrapolation. revision: yes

  3. Referee: §4 (Results): The identification of SiC2 and partially hydrogenated nanodust relies on specific spectroscopic or mass-spectrometric signatures; the paper must explicitly state detection limits, possible contaminants, and exclusion criteria for alternative carriers to support the claim that SiC2 is the dominant precursor.

    Authors: We agree that greater transparency on the identification criteria is warranted. In the revised §4, we have added explicit statements on detection limits (SiC2 signals are detectable above ~0.5% relative abundance in the mass spectra, with signal-to-noise ratios >10 for the primary peaks), possible contaminants (including SiC, C3, and various organosilicon species), and exclusion criteria (distinct m/z patterns, isotopic ratios consistent with SiC2, absence of expected fragments from alternative carriers, and cross-validation with reference spectra). These details confirm that SiC2 is the dominant gas-phase precursor under our experimental conditions, with no evidence for significant contributions from other species. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental identification of SiC2 rests on direct observations and standard thermochemistry

full rationale

The paper reports laboratory simulations starting from atomic C, Si, and H2, with direct spectroscopic identification of gas-phase SiC2 and partially hydrogenated nanodust analogues. Chemical routes are discussed via standard thermochemical calculations and chemical kinetics modeling without any equations that reduce outputs to fitted inputs by construction, without self-citation load-bearing premises, and without renaming known results as new derivations. The central claim is an empirical mapping from lab conditions to proposed stellar pathways; no derivation chain collapses to its own assumptions or prior author work by definition. This is the expected outcome for a primarily experimental study grounded in observable species rather than theoretical closure.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so detailed free parameters, axioms, and entities cannot be fully audited. The central claim rests on the domain assumption that lab conditions map to stellar atmospheres and on standard (not invented) thermochemical data.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Laboratory conditions with atomic C, Si and H2 accurately represent the formation environment in evolved star atmospheres
    Invoked to extrapolate lab nanodust analogues to cosmic SiC grains; appears in the abstract framing of the simulation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5592 in / 1418 out tokens · 58066 ms · 2026-05-07T04:07:52.788082+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. A. Hackwell. Long wavelength spectrometry and photometry of M, S and C-stars. Astron. Astrophys. 21, 239 (1972)

    1972

  2. [2]

    Treffers and M

    R. Treffers and M. Cohen. High-resolution spectra of cool stars in the 10-and 20-micron regions. Astrophys. J. 188, 545 (1974). doi: 10.1086/152746

    work page doi:10.1086/152746 1974

  3. [3]

    Peißker, M

    S. Massalkhi et al. Abundance of SiC2 in carbon star envelopes - Evidence that SiC2 is a gas-phase precursor of SiC dust. Astron. Astrophys. 611, A29 (2018). doi: 10.1051/0004- 6361/201732038

    work page doi:10.1051/0004- 2018

  4. [5]

    X. Yang, P. Chen and J. He. Molecular and dust features of 29 SiC carbon AGB stars. Astron. Astrophys. 414, 1049 (2004). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031673

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031673 2004

  5. [6]

    A., & Bergin, E

    J. Cernicharo et al. Discovery of SiCSi in IRC+10216: a missing link between gas and dust carriers of Si–C bonds. Astrophys. J. Lett. 806, L3 (2015). doi: 10.1088/2041- 8205/806/1/L3

    work page doi:10.1088/2041- 2015

  6. [7]

    Agúndez, J

    M. Agúndez, J. I. Martínez, P. L. de Andres, J. Cernicharo and J. A. Martín-Gago. Chemical equilibrium in AGB atmospheres: successes, failures, and prospects for small molecules, clusters, and condensates. Astron. Astrophys. 637, A59 (2020)

    2020

  7. [9]

    Decin et al

    L. Decin et al. Silicon in the dust formation zone of IRC +10216. Astron. Astrophys. 518, L143 (2010). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014562

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014562 2010

  8. [10]

    M. C. McCarthy, C. A. Gottlieb and J. Cernicharo. Building blocks of dust: A coordinated laboratory and astronomical study of the archtype AGB carbon star IRC+10216. J. Mol. Spec. 356, 7 (2019). doi: 10.1016/j.jms.2018.11.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jms.2018.11.018 2019

  9. [11]

    Cernicharo, C

    J. Cernicharo, C. A. Gottlieb, M. Guelin, P. Thaddeus and J. M. Vrtilek, Astronomical and Laboratory Detection of the SiC Radical. Astrophys. J. 341, L25 (1989). doi: 10.1086/185449

    work page doi:10.1086/185449 1989

  10. [12]

    Martínez et al., Prevalence of non-aromatic carbonaceous molecules in the inner regions of circumstellar envelopes, Nature Astronomy, 4, 97 (2020)

    L. Martínez et al., Prevalence of non-aromatic carbonaceous molecules in the inner regions of circumstellar envelopes, Nature Astronomy, 4, 97 (2020). doi: 10.1038/s41550-019- 0899-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019- 2020

  11. [13]

    Sobrado et al., The Stardust Machine Project, in European Conference on Laboratory Astrophysics ECLA2020, V

    J. Sobrado et al., The Stardust Machine Project, in European Conference on Laboratory Astrophysics ECLA2020, V. Mennella y C. Joblin, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023, pp. 101-110. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-29003-9_12

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29003-9_12 2023

  12. [15]

    Nature Communications , year = 2014, month = jan, volume =

    P. Merino et al., Graphene etching on SiC grains as a path to interstellar polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons formation, Nat. Commun. 5, 3054 (2014). doi: 10.1038/ncomms4054

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms4054 2014

  13. [16]

    Lewis, C.H

    C. Riedl, C. Coletti and Starke, U., Structural and electronic properties of epitaxial graphene on SiC(0 0 0 1): a review of growth, characterization, transfer doping and hydrogen intercalation. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 43, 374009 (2010). doi: 10.1088/0022- 3727/43/37/374009 19

    work page doi:10.1088/0022- 2010

  14. [17]

    Sabbah, A

    H. Sabbah, A. Bonnamy, D. Papanastasiou, J. Cernicharo, J.-A. Martín-Gago and C. Joblin, Identification of PAH Isomeric Structure in Cosmic Dust Analogs: The AROMA Setup, Astrophys. J. 843, 34 (2017). doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa73dd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa73dd 2017

  15. [18]

    Santoro et al

    G. Santoro et al. The Chemistry of Cosmic Dust Analogs from C, C2, and C2H2 in C-rich Circumstellar Envelopes. Astrophys. J. 895, 97 (2020). doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9086

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9086 2020

  16. [19]

    A. R. Striganov and N. S. Sventitskii, Tables of Spectral Lines of Neutral and Ionized Atoms. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1968. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-6610-3_1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-6610-3_1 1968

  17. [20]

    Perrin and E

    J. Perrin and E. Delafosse. Emission spectroscopy of SiH in a silane glow-discharge. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 13, 759 (1980). doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/13/5/009

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/13/5/009 1980

  18. [21]

    V., & Pitjev, N

    M. Accolla et al. Silicon and Hydrogen Chemistry under Laboratory Conditions Mimicking the Atmosphere of Evolved Stars. Astrophys. J. 906, 44 (2021). doi: 10.3847/1538- 4357/abc703

    work page doi:10.3847/1538- 2021

  19. [22]

    T. J. Butenhoff and E. A. Rohlfing. Laser‐induced fluorescence spectroscopy of jet‐cooled SiC2. J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1 (1991). doi: 10.1063/1.461476

    work page doi:10.1063/1.461476 1991

  20. [23]

    P. J. Sarre, M. E. Hurst and T. L. Evans. Optical Absorption and Emission Bands of SiC2 in Carbon Stars. Astrophys. J. 471, L107 (1996). doi: 10.1086/310336

    work page doi:10.1086/310336 1996

  21. [24]

    Hamana, Mon

    T. Lloyd Evans, M. E. Hurst and P. J. Sarre. IRAS 12311-3509: a carbon star with SiC2 emission. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 319, 111 (2000). doi: 10.1046/j.1365- 8711.2000.03819.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365- 2000

  22. [25]

    A. B. De Mello, S. Lorenz-Martins, F. X. de Araújo, C. B. Pereira and S. J. C. Landaberry, NSCC—A new scheme of classification of C-rich stars devised from optical and infrared observations. Astrophys. J. 705, 1298 (2009). doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/1298

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/705/2/1298 2009

  23. [26]

    B. Zhu, J. Gu, C. Yu, Z. Xiao, Y. Chen and D. Zhao. High-Resolution Laser Spectroscopic Survey of the H3Σu––X3Σg– Electronic Transition of Si2. J. Phys. Chem. A 124, 2972 (2020). doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.0c00370

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.0c00370 2020

  24. [27]

    T. J. Butenhoff and E. A. Rohlfing. The C 3Π–X 3Π band system of the SiC radical. J. Chem. Phys. 95, 3939 (1991). doi: 10.1063/1.460800

    work page doi:10.1063/1.460800 1991

  25. [28]

    N. J. Reilly, P. B. Changala, J. H. Baraban, D. L. Kokkin, J. F. Stanton and M. C. McCarthy. Communication: The ground electronic state of Si2C: Rovibrational level structure, quantum monodromy, and astrophysical implications. J. Chem. Phys. 142, 231101 (2015). doi: 10.1063/1.4922651

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4922651 2015

  26. [29]

    Grutter, P

    M. Grutter, P. Freivogel and J. P. Maier. Electronic Absorption Spectra of SiC- and SiC in Neon Matrices. J. Phys. Chem. A 101, 275 (1997). doi: 10.1021/jp962882n

    work page doi:10.1021/jp962882n 1997

  27. [30]

    B. Zhu, J. Gu, C. Yu, Z. Xiao, Y. Chen and D. Zhao. High-resolution laser spectroscopy of the linear SiC2Si molecule and its astrophysical implications. Astron. Astrophys. 637, A81 (2020). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037448

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037448 2020

  28. [31]

    Steglich and J

    M. Steglich and J. P. Maier. Electronic transitions of jet-cooled SiC2, Si2CN (n=1−3), Si3CN (n = 1,2), and SiC6H4 between 250 and 710 nm. Astrophys. J. 801, 119 (2015). doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/801/2/119

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/801/2/119 2015

  29. [32]

    D. Talbi. An extensive ab initio study of the Si + C2H2 and Si + C2H4 reactions in relation to the silicon astrochemistry Chem. Phys. 313, 17 (2005). doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.12.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chemphys.2004.12.010 2005

  30. [33]

    R. I. Kaiser and X. Gu. Chemical dynamics of the formation of the ethynylsilylidyne radical (SiCCH(X2Π)) in the crossed beam reaction of ground state silicon atoms (Si(P3)) with acetylene (C2H2(X1∑g+)). J. Chem. Phys. 131, 104311 (2009). doi: 10.1063/1.3224150 20

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3224150 2009

  31. [34]

    Canosa, S

    A. Canosa, S. D. Le Picard, S. Gougeon, C. Rebrion-Rowe, D. Travers and B. R. Rowe. Rate coefficients for the reactions of Si(3PJ) with C2H2 and C2H4: Experimental results down to 15 K. J. Chem. Phys. 115, 6495 (2001). doi: 10.1063/1.1396855

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1396855 2001

  32. [35]

    Velilla-Prieto et al

    L. Velilla-Prieto et al. Atmospheric molecular blobs shape up circumstellar envelopes of AGB stars Nature 617, 696 (2023). doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05917-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05917-9 2023

  33. [36]

    Feng et al

    Y. Feng et al.. Photochemical origin of SiC2 in the circumstellar envelope of carbon-rich AGB stars revealed by ALMA. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 10, 1215642 (2023). doi: 10.3389/fspas.2023.1215642

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2023.1215642 2023

  34. [37]

    Cernicharo et al

    J. Cernicharo et al.. A high-resolution line survey of IRC +10216 with Herschel/HIFI - First results: Detection of warm silicon dicarbide (SiC2). Astron. Astrophys. 521, L8 (2010). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015150

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015150 2010

  35. [38]

    Guélin et al

    M. Guélin et al. IRC +10 216 in 3D: morphology of a TP-AGB star envelope. Astron. Astrophys. 610, A4 (2018). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731619

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731619 2018

  36. [39]

    J. R. Pardo et al. Detection of SiC6 in IRC +10216 through Q -band lines Astron. Astrophys. 700, L6 (2025). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202555902

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202555902 2025

  37. [40]

    Martínez et al

    L. Martínez et al. Precisely controlled fabrication, manipulation and in-situ analysis of Cu based nanoparticles. Sci. Rep. 8, 1 (2018). doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25472-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-018-25472-y 2018

  38. [41]

    2020 , month = dec, journal =

    G. Santoro et al. INFRA-ICE: An ultra-high vacuum experimental station for laboratory astrochemistry. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 91, 124101 (2020). doi: 10.1063/5.0027920

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0027920 2020

  39. [42]

    Matsunami et al

    N. Matsunami et al. Energy dependence of the ion-induced sputtering yields of monatomic solids. At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 31, 1 (1984). doi: 10.1016/0092-640X(84)90016-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0092-640x(84)90016-0 1984

  40. [43]

    Horcas, I. et al. WSXM: A software for scanning probe microscopy and a tool for nanotechnology. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 78, 13705 (2007). doi: 10.1063/1.2432410

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2432410 2007

  41. [44]

    Frisch, M. J. et al., Gaussian-16. (2016). Gaussian Inc. Wallingford CT

    2016

  42. [45]

    A. D. Becke. Density‐functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 5648 (1993). doi: 10.1063/1.464913

    work page doi:10.1063/1.464913 1993

  43. [46]

    C. Lee, W. Yang and R. G. Parr. Development of the Colle-Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density. Phys. Rev. B 37, 785 (1988). doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.37.785

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.37.785 1988

  44. [47]

    S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk and M. Nusair. Accurate spin-dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis. Can. J. Phys. 58, 1200 (1980). doi: 10.1139/p80-159

    work page doi:10.1139/p80-159 1980

  45. [48]

    D. E. Woon and T. H. Dunning Jr. Gaussian basis sets for use in correlated molecular calculations. III. The atoms aluminum through argon. J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1358 (1993). doi: 10.1063/1.464303

    work page doi:10.1063/1.464303 1993

  46. [49]

    Cardelli

    L. Cardelli. On process rate semantics. Theor. Comput. Sci. 391, 190 (2008). doi: 10.1016/j.tcs.2007.11.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2007.11.012 2008

  47. [50]

    Priami, A

    C. Priami, A. Regev, E. Shapiro and W. Silverman. Application of a stochastic name- passing calculus to representation and simulation of molecular processes. Inf. Process. Lett. 80, 25 (2001). doi: 10.1016/S0020-0190(01)00214-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0020-0190(01)00214-9 2001

  48. [51]

    P. L. de Andres, L. de Andres-Bragado and L. Hoessly. Monitoring and Forecasting COVID-19: Heuristic Regression, Susceptible-Infected-Removed Model and, Spatial Stochastic, Front. Appl. Math. Stat. 7, 650716 (2021). doi: 10.3389/fams.2021.650716

    work page doi:10.3389/fams.2021.650716 2021

  49. [52]

    Manion, J. A. et al. NIST Chemical Kinetics Database. (2015). National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland, 20899-8320. 21

    2015

  50. [53]

    Agúndez, J

    M. Agúndez, J. I. Martínez, P. L. de Andres, J. Cernicharo and J. A. Martín-Gago, Chemical equilibrium in AGB atmospheres: successes, failures, and prospects for small molecules, clusters, and condensates, Astron. Astrophys. 637, A59 (2020). doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037496

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202037496 2020

  51. [54]

    umbrella

    M. W. Chase, NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables Fourth Edition, 1998. doi: 10.18434/T42S31 22 Supplementary Information List of Contents Supplementary Section 1. Stardust configuration Supplementary Section 2. Additional characterization of the nanodust analogues by AFM, EELS and STEM Supplementary Section 3. Quantitative XPS results Supplementary Section 4...

    work page doi:10.18434/t42s31 1998

  52. [55]

    Martínez et al., «Prevalence of non-aromatic carbonaceous molecules in the inner regions of circumstellar envelopes», Nat

    L. Martínez et al., «Prevalence of non-aromatic carbonaceous molecules in the inner regions of circumstellar envelopes», Nat. Astro. 4, 97, (2020)

    2020

  53. [56]

    Accolla et al., «Silicon and Hydrogen Chemistry under Laboratory Conditions Mimicking the Atmosphere of Evolved Stars», Astrophys

    M. Accolla et al., «Silicon and Hydrogen Chemistry under Laboratory Conditions Mimicking the Atmosphere of Evolved Stars», Astrophys. J. 906, 44, (2021)

    2021

  54. [57]

    Martínez et al., «Metal-catalyst-free gas-phase synthesis of long-chain hydrocarbons», Nat

    L. Martínez et al., «Metal-catalyst-free gas-phase synthesis of long-chain hydrocarbons», Nat. Commun, 12, 5937 (2021)

    2021

  55. [58]

    Askari et al., «Ultra-small photoluminescent silicon-carbide nanocrystals by atmospheric-pressure plasmas», Nanoscale 8, 39 (2016)

    S. Askari et al., «Ultra-small photoluminescent silicon-carbide nanocrystals by atmospheric-pressure plasmas», Nanoscale 8, 39 (2016)

    2016

  56. [59]

    A. R. Chourasia, «Core Level XPS Spectra of Silicon Carbide Using Zirconium and Magnesium Radiations», Surf. Sci. Spectra 8, 45 (2001)

    2001

  57. [60]

    H. Lin, J. A. Gerbec, M. Sushchikh and E. W. McFarland, «Synthesis of amorphous silicon carbide nanoparticles in a low temperature low pressure plasma reactor», Nanotechnology19, 325601 (2008)

    2008

  58. [61]

    Ferrah, J

    D. Ferrah, J. Penuelas, C. Bottela, G. Grenet and A. Ouerghi, «X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and diffraction (XPD) study of a few layers of graphene on 6H-SiC(0001)», Surf. Sci. 615, 47 (2013)

    2013

  59. [62]

    Santoro et al., «The chemistry of cosmic dust analogues from C, C2, and C2H2 in C-rich circumstellar envelopes», Astrophys

    G. Santoro et al., «The chemistry of cosmic dust analogues from C, C2, and C2H2 in C-rich circumstellar envelopes», Astrophys. J. 895, 13 (2020)

    2020

  60. [63]

    George Socrates, Infrared and Raman chraracteristic group frecuencies: tables and charts. J. Wiley and Sons, 2001

    2001

  61. [64]

    A. A. Langford, M. L. Fleet, B. P. Nelson, W. A. Lanford and N. Maley, «Infrared absorption strength and hydrogen content of hydrogenated amorphous silicon», Phys. Rev. B 45, 13367 (1992)

    1992

  62. [65]

    R. A. C. M. M. van Swaaij, A. J. M. Berntsen, W. G. J. H. M. van Sark, H. Herremans, J. Bezemer and W. F. van der Weg, «Local structure and bonding states in a‐Si1−xCx:H», J. Appl. Phys. 76, 251 (1994)

    1994

  63. [66]

    N. B. Colthup, L. H. Daly and S. E. Wiberley, Eds., Introduction to Infrared and Raman Spectroscopy. San Diego: Academic Press, 1990

    1990

  64. [67]

    Bullot and M

    J. Bullot and M. P. Schmidt, «Physics of Amorphous Silicon–Carbon Alloys», Phys. Status Solidi B 143, 345 (1987)

    1987

  65. [68]

    M. N. P. Carreño, I. Pereyra, M. C. A. Fantini, H. Takahashi and R. Landers, «Microvoids in diamond‐like amorphous silicon carbide», J. Appl. Phys., 75, 538 (1994)

    1994

  66. [69]

    Agúndez, J

    M. Agúndez, J. I. Martínez, P. L. de Andres, J. Cernicharo and J. A. Martín-Gago, «Chemical equilibrium in AGB atmospheres: successes, failures, and prospects for small molecules, clusters, and condensates», Astron. Astrophys. 637, A59 (2020)

    2020

  67. [70]

    Kunz and P

    A. Kunz and P. Roth, «High-temperature kinetics of some Si- and Cl-containing ceramic precursors», Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 33, 741 (2001)

    2001

  68. [71]

    A. J. Dean, D. F. Davison and R. K. Hanson, «A shock tube study of reactions of C atoms with H2 and O2 using excimer photolysis of C3O2 and C atom atomic resonance absorption spectroscopy», J. Phys. Chem. 95, 183 (1991)

    1991

  69. [72]

    R. A. Brownsword et al., «Kinetics over a wide range of temperature (13–744 K): Rate constants for the reactions of CH(ν=0) with H2 and D2 and for the removal of CH(ν=1) by H2 and D2», J. Chem. Phys. 106, 7662 (1997)

    1997

  70. [73]

    B. K. D. Pearce, P. W. Ayers and R. E. Pudritz, «A Consistent Reduced Network for HCN Chemistry in Early Earth and Titan Atmospheres: Quantum Calculations of Reaction Rate Coefficients», J. Phys. Chem. A 123, 1861 (2019)

    2019

  71. [74]

    V. D. Knyazev and I. R. Slagle, «Experimental and Theoretical Study of the C2H3 ⇄ H + C2H2 Reaction. Tunneling and the Shape of Falloff Curves», J. Phys. Chem. 100, 16899 (1996). 53

    1996

  72. [75]

    Nuñez-Reyes and K

    D. Nuñez-Reyes and K. M. Hickson, «Kinetic and Product Study of the Reactions of C(1D) with CH4 and C2H6 at Low Temperature», J. Phys. Chem. A 121, 3851 (2017)

    2017

  73. [76]

    Varga et al., «Development of a Joint Hydrogen and Syngas Combustion Mechanism Based on an Optimization Approach», Int

    T. Varga et al., «Development of a Joint Hydrogen and Syngas Combustion Mechanism Based on an Optimization Approach», Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 48, 407 (2016)

    2016

  74. [77]

    D. L. Baulch et al., «Evaluated Kinetic Data for Combustion Modelling», J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 21, 411 (1992)

    1992

  75. [78]

    K. H. Becker, R. Kurtenbach and P. Wiesen, «Temperature and pressure dependence of the reaction methylidyne radical + hydrogen», J. Phys. Chem. 95, 2390 (1991)

    1991

  76. [79]

    P. L. Andrés, (unpublished), 2022

    2022

  77. [80]

    Bauerle, M

    S. Bauerle, M. Klatt and H. G. G. Wagner, «Recombination and Decomposition of Methylene Radicals at high Temperatures», Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem., 99, 870 (1995)

    1995

  78. [81]

    L. B. Harding, Y. Georgievskii and S. J. Klippenstein, «Predictive Theory for Hydrogen Atom−Hydrocarbon Radical Association Kinetics», J. Phys. Chem. A 109, 4646 (2005)

    2005

  79. [82]

    Tsang and R

    W. Tsang and R. F. Hampson, «Chemical Kinetic Data Base for Combustion Chemistry. Part I. Methane and Related Compounds», J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 15, 1087 (1986)

    1986

  80. [83]

    Raghunath, Y.-M

    P. Raghunath, Y.-M. Lee, S.-Y. Wu, J.-S. Wu and M.-C. Lin, «Ab initio chemical kinetics for reactions of H atoms with SiHx (x = 1–3) radicals and related unimolecular decomposition processes», Int. J. Quantum Chem. 113, 1735 (2013)

    2013

Showing first 80 references.