pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03617 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · cs.NA· math.NA

Recognition: unknown

Pressure-equilibrium-preserving and fully conservative discretization of compressible flow equations for real and thermally perfect gases

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn cs.NAmath.NA
keywords pressure equilibrium preservationconservative discretizationcompressible Euler equationsreal gas equation of statenumerical fluxessupercritical flowstranscritical conditions
0
0 comments X

The pith

A discretization for compressible flows preserves mass, momentum and total energy conservation while exactly enforcing pressure equilibrium for arbitrary equations of state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a numerical method for simulating compressible flows of real and thermally perfect gases that avoids spurious pressure oscillations at abrupt variations. It does so by introducing nonlinear numerical fluxes for mass and internal energy that are constructed to depend on the specific equation of state. This approach ensures that the linear invariants remain conserved at the discrete level without sacrificing the pressure equilibrium condition. A sympathetic reader would care because such oscillations have long limited reliable computation of supercritical and transcritical flows in engineering applications. The scheme additionally preserves convective kinetic energy conservation and includes a practical approximate variant.

Core claim

The central claim is that nonlinear numerical fluxes for mass and internal energy can be defined depending on the details of an arbitrary equation of state such that the discretization of the compressible Euler equations simultaneously preserves the full conservation of mass, momentum and total energy and exactly enforces the pressure equilibrium condition. The formulation applies to both thermally perfect gases and real gases, preserves kinetic energy conservation by convection, and admits a simplified approximate pressure-equilibrium-preserving version that performs well in practice.

What carries the argument

Nonlinear numerical fluxes for mass and internal energy defined to depend on the equation of state, which enforce both discrete conservation of the linear invariants and exact pressure equilibrium.

Load-bearing premise

That nonlinear fluxes for mass and internal energy can be constructed from an arbitrary equation of state to satisfy both exact discrete pressure equilibrium and full conservation of mass, momentum and total energy without inconsistencies.

What would settle it

A one-dimensional advection test of a density discontinuity at constant velocity and pressure, checking whether the pressure field remains exactly uniform and total energy is conserved to machine precision under the proposed fluxes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03617 by Alessandro Aiello, Carlo De Michele, Gennaro Coppola.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Global kinetic-energy evolution for the one-dime view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Density and pressure profiles for the one-dimensio view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Density profile (a) and total energy evolution (b) fo view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Density profile (a) and total energy evolution (b) fo view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two-dimensional inviscid double-jet flow for a the view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Two-dimensional inviscid double-jet flow for a van view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Two-dimensional inviscid double-jet flow for a Pen view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Instantaneous pressure fields for the two-dimensi view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Numerical simulations of compressible real-fluid flows are notoriously plagued by spurious pressure oscillations arising in regions of abrupt flow variations. As a possible remedy, several numerical formulations enforce the pressure equilibrium condition for the compressible Euler equations, typically at the cost of spoiling the correct conservation of total energy or by overspecifying the thermodynamical variables. This study proposes for the first time a numerical discretization procedure which is able to discretely preserve the full conservation of the linear invariants (mass, momentum and total energy) and to exactly enforce the pressure equilibrium condition. The method also preserves the conservation of kinetic energy by convection, and is based on the specification of nonlinear numerical fluxes for mass and internal energy which depend on the details of the equation of state. Both thermally perfect and real gases with an arbitrary equation of state are considered, and a simplified approximate pressure equilibrium preserving formulation with excellent performances is also proposed. The effectiveness of the novel formulations is assessed through a series of numerical simulations in supercritical and transcritical conditions with some of the most popular cubic equations of state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a discretization scheme for the compressible Euler equations (for both thermally perfect gases and real gases with arbitrary EOS) that uses nonlinear numerical fluxes for mass and internal energy (constructed to depend on the specific EOS) in order to simultaneously achieve discrete conservation of mass/momentum/total energy, exact enforcement of pressure equilibrium, and conservation of kinetic energy by convection. Explicit algebraic conditions and constructions are given for both an exact variant and a simplified approximate variant; the approach is verified on standard 1D/2D tests using cubic EOS (Peng-Robinson, Soave-Redlich-Kwong) in supercritical and transcritical regimes.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the result would be significant because it resolves the tension between conservation and pressure-equilibrium preservation that has limited prior real-fluid simulations, without overspecifying thermodynamics or sacrificing total-energy conservation. The explicit flux constructions, derivation of the required algebraic conditions on the fluxes, and verification across relevant regimes constitute concrete strengths that could enable more reliable high-fidelity computations in propulsion and energy applications.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract and introduction state that the method 'exactly enforces the pressure equilibrium condition' and 'preserves the conservation of kinetic energy by convection,' but the precise discrete statements (e.g., which finite-volume or finite-difference operators are used and how the EOS-dependent fluxes enter the update) should be stated once in a single theorem-like box for clarity.
  2. Section describing the approximate variant: the claim of 'excellent performances' is supported by the reported tests, yet a short quantitative table comparing L2 errors or oscillation amplitudes between the exact and approximate formulations on the same 1D/2D cases would make the practical trade-off explicit.
  3. The manuscript tests only cubic EOS; a brief remark on whether the algebraic conditions derived in the general-EOS section remain well-posed for non-cubic forms (e.g., virial or tabulated EOS) would help readers assess generality.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, recognition of its significance for real-fluid simulations, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments are listed in the report, so we have no points requiring point-by-point rebuttal or defense. We will prepare a revised manuscript addressing any minor editorial or typographical suggestions that may arise during the revision process.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is constructive and self-contained

full rationale

The paper constructs explicit nonlinear numerical fluxes for mass and internal energy that depend on an arbitrary equation of state, then derives the algebraic conditions these fluxes must satisfy to enforce discrete conservation of mass/momentum/total energy, exact pressure equilibrium, and convective kinetic energy preservation. These conditions are solved directly from the target invariants without fitting parameters to data, without renaming prior results, and without load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to an unverified premise. The approximate variant is presented transparently as a simplification. The derivation chain therefore remains independent of its own outputs and does not collapse by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and constructibility of nonlinear numerical fluxes that simultaneously satisfy conservation and pressure-equilibrium properties for arbitrary equations of state. No free parameters, new physical entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond standard compressible flow assumptions are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The compressible Euler equations govern the fluid motion under the considered conditions.
    Standard governing equations for the discretization target.
  • domain assumption A discrete framework (e.g., finite-volume) exists in which fluxes can be designed to enforce exact algebraic properties.
    Implicit requirement for any flux-based numerical method claiming discrete preservation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5491 in / 1381 out tokens · 77546 ms · 2026-05-07T14:14:43.669915+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Pe ˇcnik, E

    R. Pe ˇcnik, E. Rinaldi, P . Colonna, Computational fluid dynamics o f a radial compressor operating with supercritical CO 2, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power 134 (2012)

  2. [2]

    Jofre, J

    L. Jofre, J. Urzay, Transcritical diffuse-interface hy drodynamics of propellants in high-pressure combustors of chemical propulsion Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 82 (2021) 100877

  3. [3]

    Guardone, P

    A. Guardone, P . Colonna, M. Pini, A. Spinelli, Nonideal compressible fluid dynamics of dense vapors and supercritica l fluids, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 56 (2024) 241–269

  4. [4]

    Terashima, M

    H. Terashima, M. Koshi, Approach for simulating gas–liq uid-like flows under supercritical pressures using a high-o rder central differencing J. Comput. Phys. 231 (2012) 6907–6923

  5. [5]

    Abgrall, How to prevent pressure oscillations in mult icomponent flow calculations: A quasi conservative approac h, J

    R. Abgrall, How to prevent pressure oscillations in mult icomponent flow calculations: A quasi conservative approac h, J. Comput. Phys. 125 (1996) 150–160

  6. [6]

    T. Y . Hou, P . G. LeFloch, Why nonconservative schemes con verge to wrong solutions: error analysis, Math. Comput. 62 (1994) 497–530

  7. [7]

    Karni, Multicomponent flow calculations by a consiste nt primitive algorithm, J

    S. Karni, Multicomponent flow calculations by a consiste nt primitive algorithm, J. Comput. Phys. 112 (1994) 31–43

  8. [8]

    Shyue, A fluid-mixture type algorithm for compress ible multicomponent flow with Mie–Grüneisen equation of sta te, J

    K.-M. Shyue, A fluid-mixture type algorithm for compress ible multicomponent flow with Mie–Grüneisen equation of sta te, J. Comput. Phys. 171 (2001) 678–707

  9. [9]

    Kawai, H

    S. Kawai, H. Terashima, H. Negishi, A robust and accurate numerical method for transcritical turbulent flows at super critical pressure J. Comput. Phys. 300 (2015) 116–135

  10. [10]

    Lacaze, T

    G. Lacaze, T. Schmitt, A. Ruiz, J. C. Oefelein, Comparis on of energy-, pressure- and enthalpy-based approaches for modeling supercritical Comput. Fluids 181 (2019) 35–56

  11. [11]

    Abgrall, S

    R. Abgrall, S. Karni, Computations of compressible mul tifluids, J. Comput. Phys. 169 (2001) 594–623

  12. [12]

    P . C. Ma, Y . Lv, M. Ihme, An entropy-stable hybrid scheme for simulations of transcritical real-fluid flows, J. Comput. Phys. 340 (2017) 330–357

  13. [13]

    Fujiwara, Y

    Y . Fujiwara, Y . Tamaki, S. Kawai, Fully conservative and pressure-equilibrium preserving scheme for compressibl e multi-component J. Comput. Phys. 478 (2023) 111973

  14. [14]

    Terashima, N

    H. Terashima, N. Ly, M. Ihme, Approximately pressure-e quilibrium-preserving scheme for fully conservative simu lations of compressible J. Comput Phys. 524 (2025) 113701

  15. [15]

    W . J. Feiereisen, W . C. Reynolds, J. H. Ferziger, Numeri cal Simulation of Compressible, Homogeneous Turbu- lent Shear Flow, Technical Report TF-13, Stanford Universi ty, 1981

  16. [16]

    Jameson, The construction of discretely conservati ve finite volume schemes that also globally conserve energy or entropy, J

    A. Jameson, The construction of discretely conservati ve finite volume schemes that also globally conserve energy or entropy, J. Sci. Comput. 34 (2008) 152–187

  17. [17]

    Pirozzoli, Generalized conservative approximatio ns of split convective derivative operators, J

    S. Pirozzoli, Generalized conservative approximatio ns of split convective derivative operators, J. Comput. Phy s. 229 (2010) 7180–7190

  18. [18]

    Shima, Y

    N. Shima, Y . Kuya, Y . Tamaki, S. Kawai, Preventing spurious pressure oscillations in split convective form discret ization for compressible J. Comput. Phys. 427 (2021) 110060

  19. [19]

    Ranocha, G

    H. Ranocha, G. Gassner, Preventing pressure oscillati ons does not fix local linear stability issues of entropy-bas ed split-form high-order Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. 4 (2022) 880–903

  20. [20]

    De Michele, G

    C. De Michele, G. Coppola, Asymptotically entropy-con servative and kinetic-energy preserving numerical fluxes f or compressible J. Comput. Phys. 492 (2023) 112439

  21. [21]

    De Michele, G

    C. De Michele, G. Coppola, Novel pressure-equilibrium and kinetic-energy preserving fluxes for compressible flows based on the harmonic J. Comput. Phys. 518 (2024) 113338

  22. [22]

    Kawai, S

    S. Kawai, S. Kawai, Logarithmic mean approximation in i mproving entropy conservation in KEEP scheme with pressure equilibrium J. Comput. Phys. 530 (2025) 113897

  23. [23]

    Bernades, L

    M. Bernades, L. Jofre, F. Capuano, Kinetic-energy- and pressure-equilibrium-preserving schemes for real-gas tu rbulence in the transcritical J. Comput. Phys. 493 (2023) 112477

  24. [24]

    Pirozzoli, Stabilized non-dissipative approximat ions of Euler equations in generalized curvilinear coordin ates, J

    S. Pirozzoli, Stabilized non-dissipative approximat ions of Euler equations in generalized curvilinear coordin ates, J. Comput. Phys. 230 (2011) 2997–3014

  25. [25]

    Y . Kuya, S. Kawai, High-order accurate kinetic-energy and entropy preserving (KEEP) schemes on curvilinear grids , J. Comput. Phys. 442 (2021) 110482. 19 PEP and fully conservative discretization for compressibl e flows of real and TP gases A P REPRINT

  26. [26]

    LeFloch, J

    P . LeFloch, J. Mercier, C. Rohde, Fully discrete, entro py conservative schemes of arbitrary order, SIAM J. Nu- mer. Anal. 40 (2002) 1968–1992

  27. [27]

    T. C. Fisher, M. H. Carpenter, High-order entropy stabl e finite difference schemes for nonlinear conservation laws : Finite domains, J. Comput. Phys. 252 (2013) 518–557

  28. [28]

    Ranocha, Comparison of some entropy conservative nu merical fluxes for the Euler equations, J

    H. Ranocha, Comparison of some entropy conservative nu merical fluxes for the Euler equations, J. Sci. Comput. 76 (2018) 216–242

  29. [29]

    Aiello, C

    A. Aiello, C. De Michele, G. Coppola, Entropy conservat ive discretization of compressible Euler equations with an arbitrary equation J. Comput. Phys. 528 (2025) 113836

  30. [30]

    Coppola, F

    G. Coppola, F. Capuano, L. de Luca, Discrete energy-con servation properties in the numerical solution of the Navie r–Stokes equations Appl. Mech. Rev. 71 (2019) 010803–1 – 010803–19

  31. [31]

    Coppola, F

    G. Coppola, F. Capuano, S. Pirozzoli, L. de Luca, Numeri cally stable formulations of convective terms for turbulen t compressible flo J. Comput. Phys. 382 (2019) 86–104

  32. [32]

    A. E. P . V eldman, A general condition for kinetic-energ y preserving discretization of flow transport equations, J. Comput. Phys. 398 (2019) 108894

  33. [33]

    Coppola, A

    G. Coppola, A. E. P . V eldman, Global and local conservation of mass, momentum and kinetic energy in the simulation of compressible J. Comput. Phys. 475 (2023) 111879

  34. [34]

    De Michele, G

    C. De Michele, G. Coppola, Numerical treatment of the en ergy equation in compressible flows simulations, Comput. Fluids 250 (2023) 105709

  35. [35]

    Y . Kuya, K. Totani, S. Kawai, Kinetic energy and entropy preserving schemes for compressible flows by split convecti ve forms, J. Comput. Phys. 375 (2018) 823–853

  36. [36]

    Aiello, C

    A. Aiello, C. De Michele, G. Coppola, Formulation of ent ropy-conservative discretizations for compressible flows of thermally perfect arXiv:2507.08115 [physics.flu-dyn] (2025)

  37. [37]

    Tadmor, The numerical viscosity of entropy stable sc hemes for systems of conservation laws

    E. Tadmor, The numerical viscosity of entropy stable sc hemes for systems of conservation laws. I, Math. Com- put. 179 (1987) 91–103

  38. [38]

    Tadmor, Entropy stability theory for difference app roximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related tim e-dependent problems Acta Numerica 12 (2003) 451–512

    E. Tadmor, Entropy stability theory for difference app roximations of nonlinear conservation laws and related tim e-dependent problems Acta Numerica 12 (2003) 451–512

  39. [39]

    Ranocha, Entropy conserving and kinetic energy pres erving numerical methods for the Euler equations using summ ation-by-parts in: S

    H. Ranocha, Entropy conserving and kinetic energy pres erving numerical methods for the Euler equations using summ ation-by-parts in: S. J. Sherwin, D. Moxey, J. Peiró, P . E. Vincent, C. Schwab (Eds.), Spectral and High Order Methods for Partial Differential Equations ICOSAHOM 2018. Lecture Not es in Computational Science and Engineering, volume 134, Spr...

  40. [40]

    De Michele, A

    C. De Michele, A. K. Edoh, G. Coppola, Finite-differenc e compatible entropy-conserving schemes for the compressi ble Euler equations J. Comput. Phys. (2025) 114262

  41. [41]

    Ismail, P

    F. Ismail, P . L. Roe, Affordable, entropy-consistent E uler flux functions II: Entropy production at shocks, J. Comput. Phys. 228 (2009) 5410–5436

  42. [42]

    Klein, B

    R. Klein, B. Sanderse, P . Costa, R. Pecnik, R. Henkes, Generalized Tadmor conditions and structure-preserving num erical fluxes for

  43. [43]

    arXiv:2603.15112

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2603.15112. arXiv:2603.15112

  44. [44]

    M. A. Hansen, T. C. Fisher, Entropy Stable Discretizati on of Compressible Flows in Thermochemical Nonequi- librium, Technical Report, Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States), 2019. URL: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1763209. doi:10.2172/1763209

  45. [45]

    Chase, NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 4th Editi on, American Institute of Physics, -1, 1998

    M. Chase, NIST-JANAF Thermochemical Tables, 4th Editi on, American Institute of Physics, -1, 1998. URL: https://janaf.nist.gov/pdf/JANAF-FourthEd-1998-1Vol 1-Intro.pdf

  46. [46]

    B. J. McBride, M. J. Zehe, S. Gordon, NASA Glenn Coefficie nts for Calculating Thermodynamic Prop- erties of Individual Species, Technical Report, Glenn Rese arch Center, Cleveland, Ohio, 2002. URL: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20020085330/downloads/20020085330.pdf

  47. [47]

    Tosun, The Thermodynamics of Phase and Reaction Equi libria, second edition, Elsevier B.V ., 2021

    I. Tosun, The Thermodynamics of Phase and Reaction Equi libria, second edition, Elsevier B.V ., 2021. 20