pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04537 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

Investigating the Effects of Bars on Star Formation and Nuclear Activity of Galaxies Using DESI Survey Data

Jianfei Liu, Zhimin Zhou

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords galactic barsstar formationAGN activitydisk galaxiesgalaxy evolutionDESI surveycentral star formationgas inflows
0
0 comments X

The pith

Bars in disk galaxies drive central star formation and black hole accretion by channeling gas inward, while helping to quench star formation in massive systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes 33,201 low-redshift disk galaxies from DESI data cross-matched with Galaxy Zoo classifications to measure how bars affect star formation and nuclear activity. It reports that weak bars appear more often in blue, lower-mass disks and strong bars in redder, higher-mass ones, with strongly barred galaxies being more massive and metal-rich overall. Strong bars increase central star formation rates in low-mass galaxies but lower specific star formation rates in massive galaxies, consistent with an early boost from gas inflow followed by faster gas consumption. Barred galaxies also show higher rates of AGN activity, especially powerful AGN in strongly barred systems, though links to specific bar properties remain weak.

Core claim

Using morphological classifications from Galaxy Zoo DESI, the analysis finds that barred galaxies exhibit a bimodal distribution in color-mass space, with strong bars enhancing central star formation in low-mass systems while reducing specific star formation rates in massive ones through accelerated gas consumption. Barred systems display a higher incidence of AGN activity, particularly powerful AGN in strongly barred galaxies, supporting the view that bars transport angular momentum and drive gas inflows to fuel both central star formation and supermassive black hole accretion alongside other evolutionary processes.

What carries the argument

Statistical comparison of strong-bar, weak-bar, and unbarred disk galaxies using DESI DR1 photometry and Galaxy Zoo DESI visual classifications to track differences in color-mass distribution, central and global star formation rates, metallicity, and AGN fractions.

If this is right

  • Strong bars increase central star formation rates in low-mass galaxies.
  • Strong bars lower specific star formation rates in massive galaxies by speeding up gas use.
  • Barred galaxies show elevated AGN activity overall, with the highest fractions in strongly barred systems.
  • The link between bars and nuclear activity appears indirect, as correlations with detailed bar structural parameters are weak.
  • Bars operate together with other mechanisms in shaping overall galaxy evolution.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Galaxy formation models may need to treat bar-driven gas inflows as a standard channel for building central stellar mass and feeding black holes at low redshift.
  • The reported color-mass bimodality could help explain why some disk galaxies transition to red sequences without requiring external triggers like mergers.
  • Higher-resolution imaging or kinematic data could test whether the strength of observed inflows scales directly with bar strength in individual systems.
  • The dual role of bars (trigger then quench) implies that the timing of bar formation relative to gas reservoir size determines whether a galaxy ends up star-forming or quenched.

Load-bearing premise

Galaxy Zoo DESI visual classifications correctly and without bias identify strong bars, weak bars, and unbarred disks, and the 0.01 to 0.05 redshift disk-galaxy sample contains no major selection effects that could produce the observed trends in color, star formation, or AGN activity.

What would settle it

Repeating the analysis with an independent automated bar-detection method on the same DESI sample and finding no significant differences in central star formation rates or AGN incidence between barred and unbarred galaxies would undermine the reported connections.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04537 by Jianfei Liu, Zhimin Zhou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The color and stellar mass characteristics of the disk sample. The left panels show the distributions of (g−r) and M∗ of barred and unbarred galaxies. All frequencies are normalized. Strongly barred galaxies are shown by orange filled histograms, weakly barred galaxies are shown by blue filled histograms. The total barred sample is indicated by red open histograms, and unbarred galaxies are indicated by gr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Bar fraction in the (g−r)–M∗ plane for the disk galaxy sample. The left, middle, and right panels show the fractions for strong bar, weak bar, and the total bar samples, respectively. All bins are uniformly divided in both (g − r) and (M∗), The bar fraction in each bin is indicated by the color intensity. Gray contours represent the distribution of all disk galaxies in the sample. 3. ANALYSIS AND RESULTS W… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Distributions of bar length Rbar, normalized Rbar, and bar ellipticity ebar for the disk barred sample. The strong and weak bar subsamples are shown as orange and blue filled histograms, respectively, and the total barred sample is shown as a black open histogram. All distributions are normalized. 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 (g-r) [mag] 0.000 0.025 0.050 0.075 0.100 0.125 Frequency KS: D=0.00, p=1.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distributions of M∗ and (g − r) for the barred (red open histogram) and control (gray filled histogram) samples. KS test results comparing the two distributions are indicated in the upper right corner of each panel. 3.3. Connection with Star Formation Activity Differences in galaxy color and stellar mass may lead to statistical biases in SFR and other physical properties. To mitigate these effects, we cons… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The distributions of physical parameters for disk galaxies in the barred and control samples. The left panels show the distributions of log(SFR), log(fiber SFR), Dn(4000), and Z/Z⊙ for strongly, weakly, total barred samples and control sample, shown as orange filled, blue filled, red open, and gray open histograms, respectively. The Z/Z⊙ is computed only for star-forming galaxies. Dashed lines in the corre… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean global and fiber SFRs and sSFRs as a function of M∗, strongly, weakly, total barred samples and control sample are shown in orange dashed line, blue dotted line, black solid line, and gray dash-dotted line, respectively. Error bars indicate the standard errors. In the relation between the mean total and fiber SFR and M∗, as shown in view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mean global and fiber SFRs as a function of Rbar, normalized Rbar and ebar. Strongly and weakly barred samples are shown in orange dashed line and blue dotted line, respectively. The error bars indicate the standard errors of the mean SFR in each bin. timescales, this process not only exhausts the available gas reservoir but also leads to morphological quenching, with the growth of the central bulge, resul… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relations between global and fiber sSFRs with bar structural parameters. Line styles are the same as in view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: AGN fraction as a function of M∗, (g−r), SFR, fiber SFR, and Dn4000. The left panels show the fraction of galaxies identified as AGN by any diagnostic method, while the right panels show those classified as Seyfert by at least one BPT diagram. Strongly, weakly, total barred galaxies and galaxies in control sample are shown in orange dashed line, blue dotted line, black solid line, and gray dash-dotted line… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Distributions of [O III] λ5007 luminosity for AGN host galaxies in barred and control sample. The median log(L[O III]) of barred galaxies is shown in red dash line and unbarred galaxies in gray. although strongly barred systems showing a marginally higher level, suggesting that the central SFR is more closely tied to bar ellipticity than to the strong, weak bar classification, and bar ellipticity is likel… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Fraction of AGN with log(L[O III]) > 5.51L⊙ as a function of physical parameters: log M∗, (g − r), SFR, fiber SFR, and Dn(4000). In each panel, the orange dashed lines, blue dotted lines, black solid lines, and gray dash-dotted lines represent strongly barred, weakly barred, total barred galaxies and galaxies in control sample, respectively. Error bars indicate the binomial uncertainties of the AGN fracti… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The top, middle, and bottom panels show the fractions of AGN, BPT-Seyfert, and powerful AGN, respectively, as functions of Rbar, normalized Rbar, and ebar. In each panel, the orange dashed lines and blue dotted lines represent strongly and weakly barred galaxies, respectively. The error bars indicate the binomial uncertainties of the AGN fraction in each bin. 4. DISCUSSION Our analysis of the DESI sample … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a statistical analysis of the connections between galactic bars, star formation, and active galactic nucleus (AGN) activity using 33,201 disk galaxies (0.01 < z < 0.05) from DESI DR1 cross-matched with Galaxy Zoo DESI. Based on morphological classifications, we identify 3,508 strongly barred and 8,335 weakly barred systems. We find that barred galaxies exhibit a clear bimodal distribution in color-mass space: weak bars are preferentially found in bluer, lower-mass disks, whereas strong bars are more common in massive, redder systems. Strongly barred galaxies are on average more massive and metal-rich than unbarred systems. In addition, strong bars enhance central SFRs in low-mass galaxies but reduce sSFRs in massive systems, reflecting a dual role where bars initially trigger central star formation but eventually promote quenching by accelerating gas consumption. In terms of nuclear activity, barred galaxies display a higher incidence of AGN activity. The presence of a bar is also associated with an increased fraction of powerful AGN, with the highest proportions found in strongly barred systems. However, the correlations between AGN activity and detailed bar structural parameters are weak, suggesting that the link between bars and nuclear activity is indirect and regulated by multiple factors. Overall, our results support a scenario in which bars facilitate angular-momentum transport and gas inflow, thereby driving central star formation and fueling supermassive black hole accretion while operating alongside other processes that shape galaxy evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes 33,201 disk galaxies (0.01 < z < 0.05) from DESI DR1 cross-matched with Galaxy Zoo DESI morphologies. It identifies 3,508 strongly barred and 8,335 weakly barred systems and reports a bimodal color-mass distribution (weak bars in bluer low-mass disks, strong bars in redder massive systems), mass-dependent bar effects on star formation (enhanced central SFR in low-mass galaxies, reduced sSFR in massive ones), higher AGN incidence in barred galaxies, and an indirect link between bars and nuclear activity. The authors interpret the trends as support for bars driving angular-momentum transport and gas inflow while operating alongside other evolutionary processes.

Significance. If the reported trends prove robust after bias corrections, the work would add a large-sample observational constraint on the role of bars in central gas fueling, with implications for models of quenching and black-hole growth. The sample size from DESI DR1 is a clear asset for statistical power, though the absence of quantified controls limits immediate impact on consensus views of bar-driven evolution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 2] Section 2 (Data and Sample Selection): No vote-fraction thresholds, inter-classifier agreement metrics, or explicit tests for classification bias as a function of stellar mass, color, or inclination are described for the Galaxy Zoo DESI strong/weak bar labels. This is load-bearing for the central claims, as mass- or color-dependent classification systematics could artifactually generate the reported color-mass bimodality and the mass-dependent SFR trends.
  2. [Results] Results section (SFR and AGN trends): The dual role of bars (enhancing central SFR at low mass but suppressing sSFR at high mass) and the elevated AGN fraction are presented without reported error bars on the binned trends, without a control sample matched in environment or gas content, and without quantitative assessment of statistical significance after accounting for the mass-color correlation. These omissions prevent verification that the trends are physical rather than driven by unaccounted confounders.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The term 'powerful AGN' is used without a definition (e.g., specific luminosity or Eddington-ratio threshold); this should be stated explicitly when first introduced.
  2. [Results] Notation: The distinction between SFR and sSFR is clear in the text, but a brief reminder of the exact aperture or fiber-based measurement used for 'central SFR' would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful and constructive report. The comments highlight important areas for improving methodological transparency and statistical robustness, which we address below. We will revise the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results on bar-driven evolution in the DESI sample.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section 2] Section 2 (Data and Sample Selection): No vote-fraction thresholds, inter-classifier agreement metrics, or explicit tests for classification bias as a function of stellar mass, color, or inclination are described for the Galaxy Zoo DESI strong/weak bar labels. This is load-bearing for the central claims, as mass- or color-dependent classification systematics could artifactually generate the reported color-mass bimodality and the mass-dependent SFR trends.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of the classification criteria is essential. The Galaxy Zoo DESI bar labels follow the standard vote-fraction approach validated in the GZD survey papers, with strong bars defined by p_strong > 0.5 and weak bars by 0.2 < p_weak < 0.5 (exact thresholds will be stated). Inter-classifier agreement metrics are reported in the GZD data release documentation as high (>80% for bar features). In the revised Section 2, we will add a dedicated paragraph with these details plus explicit bias tests: we will bin the sample by stellar mass, color, and inclination and show that the strong/weak bar fractions remain consistent across bins, with no systematic trends that could drive the observed color-mass bimodality. These additions will confirm the trends are not classification artifacts. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (SFR and AGN trends): The dual role of bars (enhancing central SFR at low mass but suppressing sSFR at high mass) and the elevated AGN fraction are presented without reported error bars on the binned trends, without a control sample matched in environment or gas content, and without quantitative assessment of statistical significance after accounting for the mass-color correlation. These omissions prevent verification that the trends are physical rather than driven by unaccounted confounders.

    Authors: We will add bootstrap-derived error bars to all binned trends and median relations in the revised figures. To address confounders, we will include mass- and color-matched control subsamples (unbarred vs. barred) and perform stratified analyses. While DESI DR1 provides limited direct gas content and full environmental metrics for the entire sample, we will report partial Spearman correlations that explicitly control for the mass-color correlation and include p-values for the reported SFR and AGN trends. This quantifies significance while noting that complete gas and environment matching is beyond the current data scope; the large sample size still allows robust detection of bar effects alongside other processes. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely observational statistics

full rationale

The paper reports direct statistical measurements on 33,201 DESI disk galaxies cross-matched with Galaxy Zoo DESI morphological classifications. It counts strong/weak bars, plots color-mass distributions, compares average masses/metallicities, measures central SFR trends split by mass, and tabulates AGN fractions. No equations, model fits, predictions, or derivations appear in the provided text; all claims are empirical counts and trends. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes. The analysis is self-contained against external survey data and does not reduce any result to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on domain assumptions about data classification accuracy and sample representativeness rather than new physical axioms, free parameters, or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Galaxy Zoo DESI morphological classifications reliably identify and distinguish strongly barred, weakly barred, and unbarred disk galaxies.
    All sample divisions and reported trends depend on these citizen-science labels.
  • domain assumption The 33,201-galaxy cross-matched sample at 0.01 < z < 0.05 is representative of the underlying disk population without major selection biases affecting color, mass, SFR, or AGN trends.
    Statistical comparisons and scenario support rely on this representativeness.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5570 in / 1572 out tokens · 49926 ms · 2026-05-08T17:48:46.461305+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Aguerri, J. A. L. 1999, A&A, 351, 43

    1999

  2. [2]

    Aguerri, J. A. L., M´ endez-Abreu, J., & Corsini, E. M. 2009, A&A, 495, 491, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200810931

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200810931 2009

  3. [3]

    2000, A&A, 361, 841

    Prieto, M. 2000, A&A, 361, 841

    2000

  4. [4]

    The incidence of AGN as a function of star formation rate

    Aird, J., Coil, A. L., & Georgakakis, A. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 4360, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz125 23

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz125 2019

  5. [5]

    M., Davis, T

    Alexander, D. M., Davis, T. M., Chaussidon, E., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acacfc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acacfc 2023

  6. [6]

    Lambas, D. G. 2018, A&A, 618, A149, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832796

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832796 2018

  7. [7]

    , keywords =

    Assef, R. J., Stern, D., Noirot, G., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 23, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa00a

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aaa00a 2018

  8. [8]

    2003, MNRAS, 340, 1214, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06380.x

    Athanassoula, E. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 1179, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06473.x 2003

  9. [9]

    A., Phillips, M

    Baldwin, J. A., Phillips, M. M., & Terlevich, R. 1981, PASP, 93, 5, doi: 10.1086/130766

    work page doi:10.1086/130766 1981

  10. [10]

    D., Jogee, S., & Marinova, I

    Barazza, F. D., Jogee, S., & Marinova, I. 2008, ApJ, 675, 1194, doi: 10.1086/526510

    work page doi:10.1086/526510 2008

  11. [11]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3622, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2181

    Berney, S., Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3622, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2181

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2181 2015

  12. [12]

    CIGALE: a python Code Investigating GALaxy Emission

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    work page Pith review doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 2019

  13. [13]

    2003, MNRAS, 340, 1214, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06380.x

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x 2003

  14. [14]

    The Dust Content and Opacity of Actively Star-Forming Galaxies

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692 Cervantes Sodi, B. 2017, ApJ, 835, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/80

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/308692 2000

  15. [15]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  16. [16]

    2023, ApJ, 944, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c2

    Chaussidon, E., Y` eche, C., Palanque-Delabrouille, N., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c2 2023

  17. [17]

    Galaxy Zoo: Are bars responsible for the feeding of active galactic nuclei at 0.2 &lt; z &lt; 1.0?★

    Cheung, E., Trump, J. R., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 506, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2462

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2462 2015

  18. [18]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 5192, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz349

    Chown, R., Li, C., Athanassoula, E., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 5192, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz349 Cid Fernandes, R., Stasi´ nska, G., Mateus, A., & Vale Asari, N. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 1687, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18244.x

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz349 2019

  19. [19]

    2015, , 576, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/201425252

    Ciesla, L., Charmandaris, V., Georgakakis, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 576, A10, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425252 CSST Collaboration, Gong, Y., Miao, H., et al. 2026, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 69, 239501, doi: 10.1007/s11433-025-2809-0

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425252 2015

  20. [20]

    A., Corsini, E

    Cuomo, V., Lopez Aguerri, J. A., Corsini, E. M., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A51, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936415

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936415 2019

  21. [21]

    A Two-Parameter Model for the Infrared/Submillimeter/Radio Spectral Energy Distributions of Galaxies and AGN

    Dale, D. A., Helou, G., Magdis, G. E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/83 de Vaucouleurs, G. 1959, Handbuch der Physik, 53, 275, doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-45932-0 7 DESI Collaboration, Abdul Karim, M., Adame, A. G., et al. 2026, AJ, 171, 285, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae4c43

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/784/1/83 2014

  22. [22]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d DiGiorgio Zanger, B., Westfall, K. B., Bundy, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 116, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6606

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  23. [23]

    A., Kreckel , K., et al

    Drory, N., Blanc, G. A., Kreckel, K., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad6de9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad6de9 2024

  24. [24]

    2011, MNRAS, 418, 467, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19497.x

    Ellison, S. L., Nair, P., Patton, D. R., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 2182, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19195.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19195.x 2011

  25. [25]

    P., & Anderson, S

    Erwin, P., Debattista, V. P., & Anderson, S. R. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 3166, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1972

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1972 2023

  26. [26]

    B., Frogel, J

    Eskridge, P. B., Frogel, J. A., Pogge, R. W., et al. 2000, AJ, 119, 536, doi: 10.1086/301203 Euclid Collaboration, Huertas-Company, M., Walmsley, M., et al. 2025a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.15311, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.15311 Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y., Abdurro’uf, et al. 2025b, A&A, 697, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450810

    work page doi:10.1086/301203 2000

  27. [27]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3641, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2247

    Fanali, R., Dotti, M., Fiacconi, D., & Haardt, F. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3641, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2247

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2247 2015

  28. [28]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, L6, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz085

    Fraser-McKelvie, A., Merrifield, M., Arag´ on-Salamanca, A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 488, L6, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slz085

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slz085 2019

  29. [29]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 1116, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2866

    Fraser-McKelvie, A., Merrifield, M., Arag´ on-Salamanca, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 1116, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2866

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2866 2020

  30. [30]

    R., Jones, H

    Fritz, J., Franceschini, A., & Hatziminaoglou, E. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 767, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09866.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.09866.x 2006

  31. [31]

    Gadotti, D. A. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 3308, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18945.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18945.x 2011

  32. [32]

    A., Willett, K

    Galloway, M. A., Willett, K. W., Fortson, L. F., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 3442, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv235

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv235 2015

  33. [33]

    title The most luminous, merger-free AGNs show only marginal correlation with bar presence

    Garland, I. L., Fahey, M. J., Simmons, B. D., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 211, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad966

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad966 2023

  34. [34]

    L., Walmsley, M., Silcock, M

    Garland, I. L., Walmsley, M., Silcock, M. S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2320, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1620

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1620 2024

  35. [35]

    2021, A&A, 651, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140697 G´ eron, T., Smethurst, R

    George, K., & Subramanian, S. 2021, A&A, 651, A107, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140697 G´ eron, T., Smethurst, R. J., Lintott, C., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 4389, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2064 G´ eron, T., Smethurst, R. J., Lintott, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad66b7 G´ eron, T., Smethurst, R. J., Lintott, C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140697 2021

  36. [36]

    title Galaxy-scale Bars in Late-type Sloan Digital Sky Survey Galaxies Do Not Influence the Average Accretion Rates of Supermassive Black Holes

    Goulding, A. D., Matthaey, E., Greene, J. E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 843, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa755b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa755b 2017

  37. [37]

    2025, ApJ, 985, 181, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc8a7

    Guo, Y., Jogee, S., Wise, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 181, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc8a7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc8a7 2025

  38. [38]

    title Present- Day Growth of Black Holes and Bulges : The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Perspective

    Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., Brinchmann, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 109, doi: 10.1086/422872

    work page doi:10.1086/422872 2004

  39. [39]

    E., Hainline , K

    Hviding, R. E., Hainline, K. N., Rieke, M., et al. 2022, AJ, 163, 224, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac5e33

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac5e33 2022

  40. [40]

    Inoue, A. K. 2011, MNRAS, 415, 2920, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18906.x Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c 24

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.18906.x 2011

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Jarrett, T. H., Cohen, M., Masci, F., et al. 2011, ApJ, 735, 112, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/735/2/112

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/735/2/112 2011

  42. [42]

    and Brinchmann, Jarle and Dickinson, Mark and Duc, Pierre Alain and Gobat, Raphael and Jean-Baptiste, Ingrid and Le Floc'H, Émeric and Lehnert, M

    Juneau, S., Bournaud, F., Charlot, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 788, 88, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/88

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/88 2014

  43. [43]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x 2003

  44. [44]

    Theoretical Modeling of Starburst Galaxies

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    work page Pith review doi:10.1086/321545 2001

  45. [45]

    R., Jones, H

    Kewley, L. J., Groves, B., Kauffmann, G., & Heckman, T. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 961, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10859.x 2006

  46. [46]

    Kim, M., Choi, Y.-Y., & Kim, S. S. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5839, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1035

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1035 2020

  47. [47]

    title A Subarcsecond Resolution Near-Infrared Study of Seyfert and ``Normal'' Galaxies

    Knapen, J. H., Shlosman, I., & Peletier, R. F. 2000, ApJ, 529, 93, doi: 10.1086/308266

    work page doi:10.1086/308266 2000

  48. [48]

    Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation

    Komatsu, E., Smith, K. M., Dunkley, J., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 18, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18

    work page Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/192/2/18 2011

  49. [49]

    Kormendy, J., & Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 603, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134024 2004

  50. [50]

    2012, ApJ, 757, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/60

    Kraljic, K., Bournaud, F., & Martig, M. 2012, ApJ, 757, 60, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/60 La Marca, A., Nardone, M. T., Wang, L., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556236

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/60 2012

  51. [51]

    title Nested and Single Bars in Seyfert and Non-Seyfert Galaxies

    Laine, S., Shlosman, I., Knapen, J. H., & Peletier, R. F. 2002, ApJ, 567, 97, doi: 10.1086/323964

    work page doi:10.1086/323964 2002

  52. [52]

    2010, A&A, 509, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913168

    Lamareille, F. 2010, A&A, 509, A53, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913168

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913168 2010

  53. [53]

    R., Nelemans, G., & Steeghs, D

    Maddox, S. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 396, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07697.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07697.x 2004

  54. [54]

    2017, MNRAS, 467, 540, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx055

    Lamperti, I., Koss, M., Trakhtenbrot, B., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 540, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx055

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx055 2017

  55. [55]

    W., & Mykytyn, D

    Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., & Mykytyn, D. 2016, The Tractor: Probabilistic astronomical source detection and measurement,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1604.008 http://ascl.net/1604.008

    2016

  56. [56]

    R., Tout, C

    Laurikainen, E., & Salo, H. 2002, MNRAS, 337, 1118, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.06008.x Le Conte, Z. A., Gadotti, D. A., Ferreira, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 530, 1984, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae921

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.06008.x 2002

  57. [57]

    DO BARS TRIGGER ACTIVITY IN GALACTIC NUCLEI?

    Lee, G.-H., Woo, J.-H., Lee, M. G., et al. 2012, ApJ, 750, 141, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/2/141

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/2/141 2012

  58. [58]

    P., et al

    Li, Z., Du, M., Debattista, V. P., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acffb3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acffb3 2023

  59. [59]

    C., Barth, A

    Li, Z.-Y., Ho, L. C., Barth, A. J., & Peng, C. Y. 2011, ApJS, 197, 22, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/22

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/22 2011

  60. [60]

    2020, MNRAS, 499, 1406, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2913

    Lin, L., Li, C., Du, C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 1406, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2913

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2913 2020

  61. [61]

    title Hydrodynamical Simulations of the Barred Spiral Galaxy NGC 1097

    Lin, L.-H., Wang, H.-H., Hsieh, P.-Y., et al. 2013, ApJ, 771, 8, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/771/1/8

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/771/1/8 2013

  62. [62]

    2023, ApJ, 943, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca664 Ma lek, K., Buat, V., Roehlly, Y., et al

    Maeda, F., Egusa, F., Ohta, K., Fujimoto, Y., & Habe, A. 2023, ApJ, 943, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca664 Ma lek, K., Buat, V., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833131

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca664 2023

  63. [63]

    2025, A&A, 699, A204, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554961

    Marels, V., Mesa, V., Jaque Arancibia, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A204, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554961

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554961 2025

  64. [64]

    A., Rosales-Ortega , F

    Marino, R. A., Rosales-Ortega, F. F., S´ anchez, S. F., et al. 2013, A&A, 559, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321956

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321956 2013

  65. [65]

    1997, A&A, 323, 363, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9701091

    Martinet, L., & Friedli, D. 1997, A&A, 323, 363, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9701091

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9701091 1997

  66. [66]

    Massey, F. J. 1951, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 46, 68

    1951

  67. [67]

    L., Pinfield, D

    Masters, K. L., Nichol, R. C., Haynes, M. P., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 2180, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21377.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21377.x 2012

  68. [68]

    L., Pinfield, D

    Mateos, S., Alonso-Herrero, A., Carrera, F. J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 426, 3271, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21843.x Men´ endez-Delmestre, K., Sheth, K., Schinnerer, E., Jarrett, T. H., & Scoville, N. Z. 2007, ApJ, 657, 790, doi: 10.1086/511025

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21843.x 2012

  69. [69]

    2021, A&A, 646, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039401

    Mountrichas, G., Buat, V., Yang, G., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039401

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039401 2021

  70. [70]

    2023, FastSpecFit: Fast spectral synthesis and emission-line fitting of DESI spectra,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2308.005 http://ascl.net/2308.005

    Khederlarian, A. 2023, FastSpecFit: Fast spectral synthesis and emission-line fitting of DESI spectra,, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2308.005 http://ascl.net/2308.005

    2023

  71. [71]

    L., et al

    Mukundan, K., Nair, P., Masters, K. L., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 542, 151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1143

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1143 2025

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Myers, A. D., Moustakas, J., Bailey, S., et al. 2023, AJ, 165, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aca5f9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aca5f9 2023

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Nair, P. B., & Abraham, R. G. 2010, ApJS, 186, 427, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/427

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/427 2010

  74. [74]

    Oh, S., Oh, K., & Yi, S. K. 2012, ApJS, 198, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/4

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/198/1/4 2012

  75. [75]

    Pettini, M., & Pagel, B. E. J. 2004, MNRAS, 348, L59, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07591.x 2004

  76. [76]

    2025, ApJ, 982, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd

    Pucha, R., Juneau, S., Dey, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb1dd 2025

  77. [77]

    2022, MNRAS, 512, 5339, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac816

    Rosas-Guevara, Y., Bonoli, S., Dotti, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 5339, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac816

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac816 2022

  78. [78]

    K., Ishizuki, S., & Scoville, N

    Sakamoto, K., Okumura, S. K., Ishizuki, S., & Scoville, N. Z. 1999, ApJ, 525, 691, doi: 10.1086/307910

    work page doi:10.1086/307910 1999

  79. [79]

    Salim, S., Boquien, M., & Lee, J. C. 2018, ApJ, 859, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c 25

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aabf3c 2018

  80. [80]

    J., Almaini, O., et al

    Schawinski, K., Thomas, D., Sarzi, M., et al. 2007, MNRAS, 382, 1415, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12487.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12487.x 2007

Showing first 80 references.