pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04538 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: unknown

Second quantization of anyons and spin-anyon duality

Priyanshi Bhasin , Diptiman Sen , Tanmoy Das
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords anyonssecond quantizationJordan-Wigner dualityspin-anyon dualityAbelian anyonsone-dimensional modelstight-binding modelXY spin model
0
0 comments X

The pith

An algebraic framework for 1D Abelian anyons with phase π/N yields an exact Jordan-Wigner duality mapping π/3 anyons to spin-1 operators.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a second-quantized description for Abelian anyons in one dimension that incorporates both local occupancy limits and non-local braiding phases. It defines commutation relations with statistical phase θ = π/N that allow at most N-1 anyons per site while attaching the exchange phase between different sites. For the case θ = π/3 the algebra produces an exact operator mapping to spin-1 degrees of freedom. This converts the anyon tight-binding Hamiltonian into an XY spin-1 chain whose effective flux depends on local anyon density. The equivalence uncovers incompressible regions, gapless intervals, and critical points marked by abrupt changes in currents, momenta, and correlation functions.

Core claim

We develop an algebraic framework for Abelian anyons in one dimension with statistical phase θ = π/N that enforces a finite on-site occupancy of N-1 anyons with the exchange phase θ between different sites. Moreover, we introduce an exact Jordan-Wigner duality between π/3 anyons and spin-1 operators, allowing us to map a tight-binding anyon model to an XY-like spin-1 model. The model exhibits anyon-density-dependent flux, incompressible or gapless regions, and critical points with level crossings that appear as discontinuities in ground-state currents, momenta, fidelities, and correlation functions.

What carries the argument

The exact Jordan-Wigner duality between π/3 anyon operators and spin-1 operators, which converts the anyon hopping term into an XY interaction accompanied by density-dependent phase factors.

If this is right

  • The anyon hopping model maps to an XY spin-1 chain whose flux depends on local anyon density.
  • The phase diagram contains incompressible and gapless regions separated by critical points.
  • Level crossings at those critical points produce jumps in ground-state currents, momenta, fidelities, and correlation functions.
  • Anyons can be realized by engineering appropriate spin-1 Hamiltonians rather than by direct anyon creation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Existing spin-1 materials or optical lattices could be tuned to display signatures of anyonic statistics through the mapped Hamiltonian.
  • The algebraic construction may generalize to other rational phases θ = π/N if similar occupancy-constrained commutation rules can be found.
  • Device proposals could use spin chains as simulators for anyon transport and braiding without requiring fractional quantum Hall platforms.

Load-bearing premise

A consistent commutation algebra exists for Abelian anyons in 1D that simultaneously enforces the finite on-site occupancy N-1 and the non-local exchange phase θ between different sites.

What would settle it

Numerical diagonalization of the XY spin-1 chain that fails to reproduce discontinuities in ground-state current or momentum at the densities where the anyon model predicts level crossings would falsify the duality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04538 by Diptiman Sen, Priyanshi Bhasin, Tanmoy Das.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In all cases, we observe a coincidence of the level view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Anyons exhibit a non-trivial interplay between local exclusion rules and non-local braiding and exchange phases, making a consistent commutation algebra and second-quantized formulation challenging. We develop an algebraic framework for Abelian anyons in one dimension with statistical phase $\theta$ = $\pi$/N that enforces a finite on-site occupancy of N-1 anyons with the exchange phase $\theta$ between different sites. Moreover, we introduce an exact Jordan-Wigner duality between $\pi$/3 anyons and spin-1 operators, allowing us to map a tight-binding anyon model to an XY-like spin-1 model. The model exhibits anyon-density-dependent flux, incompressible or gapless regions, and critical points with level crossings that appear as discontinuities in ground-state currents, momenta, fidelities, and correlation functions. Our second-quantization formalism establishes a novel spin anyon duality, offering a conceptually new route to realize anyons from spin Hamiltonians and to engineer corresponding device architectures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an algebraic framework for Abelian anyons in one dimension with statistical phase θ=π/N that enforces a finite on-site occupancy of N-1 anyons per site together with the non-local exchange phase θ between different sites. It introduces an exact Jordan-Wigner duality between π/3 anyons and spin-1 operators that maps a tight-binding anyon Hamiltonian to an XY-like spin-1 model. The mapped model is shown to exhibit anyon-density-dependent flux, incompressible or gapless regions, and critical points whose level crossings appear as discontinuities in ground-state currents, momenta, fidelities, and correlation functions.

Significance. If the claimed exact duality and consistent algebra hold, the work supplies a novel spin-anyon duality that offers a conceptually new route to realize anyonic physics from spin Hamiltonians. This could facilitate quantum simulation and device engineering by translating anyonic models into experimentally accessible spin systems, while the reported density-dependent phenomena and current discontinuities provide concrete, falsifiable signatures.

major comments (2)
  1. [Algebraic framework for anyons (section introducing commutation relations)] The central claim requires a closed, associative commutation algebra for the anyon operators that simultaneously enforces the local occupancy constraint (a_i^N = 0) and the non-local phase factor e^{iθ} with θ=π/3. The manuscript asserts this algebra exists and enables an exact mapping, but does not provide an explicit check of associativity or a faithful representation on the constrained local Hilbert space of dimension N. This verification is load-bearing for the exactness of the Jordan-Wigner duality and the subsequent physical predictions.
  2. [Jordan-Wigner duality section] The Jordan-Wigner mapping to spin-1 operators is stated to be exact, yet the manuscript does not demonstrate that the non-local phase factors are fully absorbed into the spin operators without residual terms that would alter the XY-like Hamiltonian. An explicit operator-level derivation (including the action on the constrained space) is needed to confirm the mapping preserves the spectrum and observables.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] Notation for the anyon operators and the precise definition of the local constraint (e.g., whether it is a_i^3=0 or a more general projector) should be stated uniformly in the abstract and main text to avoid ambiguity for N=3.
  2. [Results section] The figures showing discontinuities in currents and fidelities would benefit from explicit labeling of the critical points and the corresponding anyon densities to make the connection to the level crossings clearer.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The two major comments identify important points where additional explicit verification would strengthen the presentation of the algebraic framework and the duality mapping. We address each comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Algebraic framework for anyons (section introducing commutation relations)] The central claim requires a closed, associative commutation algebra for the anyon operators that simultaneously enforces the local occupancy constraint (a_i^N = 0) and the non-local phase factor e^{iθ} with θ=π/3. The manuscript asserts this algebra exists and enables an exact mapping, but does not provide an explicit check of associativity or a faithful representation on the constrained local Hilbert space of dimension N. This verification is load-bearing for the exactness of the Jordan-Wigner duality and the subsequent physical predictions.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of associativity and the faithful representation is necessary for rigor. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated appendix that (i) derives the full set of commutation relations for general θ=π/N, (ii) verifies associativity by direct computation on triple products of operators, and (iii) constructs the explicit matrix representation on the N-dimensional local Hilbert space (states |0⟩ to |N−1⟩) that enforces a_i^N=0 while reproducing the non-local phase e^{iθ} for i≠j. These checks confirm that the algebra is consistent and closed on the constrained space. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Jordan-Wigner duality section] The Jordan-Wigner mapping to spin-1 operators is stated to be exact, yet the manuscript does not demonstrate that the non-local phase factors are fully absorbed into the spin operators without residual terms that would alter the XY-like Hamiltonian. An explicit operator-level derivation (including the action on the constrained space) is needed to confirm the mapping preserves the spectrum and observables.

    Authors: We accept that the original text lacked a fully expanded operator-level derivation. The revised manuscript now contains a step-by-step derivation of the duality for θ=π/3. Starting from the anyon operators, we define the spin-1 operators S_i^α via the generalized Jordan-Wigner string that incorporates the phase factors. We then show explicitly that all non-local phases are absorbed into the definition of the spin operators, leaving a purely local XY-like Hamiltonian with no residual terms. The mapping is verified to be unitary on the constrained space, preserving the spectrum and all observables; this is illustrated by direct computation on small chains (L=2,3) and by showing that the anyon number operator maps to the appropriate spin projection. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces a new algebraic framework for Abelian anyons in 1D that enforces both finite on-site occupancy (N-1) and the exchange phase θ=π/N, then presents an exact Jordan-Wigner duality mapping π/3 anyons to spin-1 operators. These are described as original constructions in the abstract and title, with the duality allowing a mapping of the tight-binding anyon Hamiltonian to an XY-like spin-1 model. No load-bearing steps reduce by construction to prior inputs, self-citations, or fitted parameters renamed as predictions. The central claims rest on the consistency of the newly developed algebra and duality rather than redefinitions or external uniqueness theorems from the same authors. The reported phenomena (density-dependent flux, level crossings, current discontinuities) follow from the mapped model without evident circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the domain assumption that a consistent algebra can be written for 1D anyons obeying both local exclusion and non-local braiding; no additional free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond the anyon model itself.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Abelian anyons in 1D with statistical phase θ = π/N enforce a finite on-site occupancy of N-1 anyons together with the exchange phase θ between different sites.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the foundation for the algebraic framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1308 out tokens · 36937 ms · 2026-05-08T17:28:33.375602+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Assumingi < j, this state is created byb † i b† j|0⟩

    Three-Site Two-Anyon Processes We label the two anyon states as (ij), where the first anyon occupies siteiand the second occupies sitej, wherei, j∈ {1,2,3}. Assumingi < j, this state is created byb † i b† j|0⟩. We focus on two distinct exchange processes that take the anyons initially located at sites 1 and 2 to the final configuration at sites 2 and 3 as...

  2. [2]

    anyon-like

    Four-Site Two-Anyon Processes Next, we examine the following four processes on a four-site lattice containing two anyons, A: (13)− →(14)− →(24)− →(21)− →(31), B: (13)− →(14)− →(24)− →(21)− →(31) − →(32)− →(42)− →(43)− →(13), C: (13)− →(23)− →(22)− →(12)− →(13), D: (13)− →(12)− →(22)− →(23)− →(13).(A3) Each of these processes involves two anyons initially ...

  3. [3]

    J. M. Leinaas and J. Myrheim, On the theory of identical particles, Nuovo Cimento B37, 1 (1977)

    1977

  4. [4]

    G. A. Goldin, R. Menikoff, and D. H. Sharp, Represen- tations of a local current algebra in nonsimply connected space and the Aharonov–Bohm effect, J. Math. Phys.22, 1664 (1981)

    1981

  5. [5]

    Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin parti- cles, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin parti- cles, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 957 (1982)

    1982

  6. [6]

    Wilczek, Magnetic flux, angular momentum, and statistics, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Magnetic flux, angular momentum, and statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1144 (1982)

    1982

  7. [7]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two- dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1559 (1982)

    1982

  8. [8]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An in- compressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged ex- citations, Phys. Rev. Lett.50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  9. [9]

    B. I. Halperin, Statistics of quasiparticles and the hierar- chy of fractional quantized Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1583 (1984)

    1984

  10. [10]

    Arovas, J

    D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Fractional statistics and the quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 722 (1984)

    1984

  11. [11]

    Wen, Chiral luttinger liquid and the edge excita- tions in the fractional quantum Hall states, Phys

    X.-G. Wen, Chiral luttinger liquid and the edge excita- tions in the fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B41, 12838 (1990)

    1990

  12. [12]

    Nayak, S

    C. Nayak, S. H. Simon, A. Stern, M. Freedman, and S. Das Sarma, Non-Abelian anyons and topological quan- tum computation, Rev. Mod. Phys.80, 1083 (2008)

    2008

  13. [13]

    Kundu, Exact solution of doubleδ-function Bose gas through an interacting anyon gas, Phys

    A. Kundu, Exact solution of doubleδ-function Bose gas through an interacting anyon gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1275 (1999)

    1999

  14. [14]

    M. T. Batchelor, X.-W. Guan, and N. Oelkers, One- dimensional interacting anyon gas: Low-energy proper- ties and Haldane exclusion statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 210402 (2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    Keilmann, S

    T. Keilmann, S. Lanzmich, I. McCulloch, and M. Roncaglia, Statistically induced phase transitions and anyons in 1d optical lattices, Nature Communications2, 361 (2011)

    2011

  16. [16]

    Greschner and L

    S. Greschner and L. Santos, Anyon hubbard model in one-dimensional optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 053002 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    G. Tang, S. Eggert, and A. Pelster, Ground-state proper- ties of anyons in a one-dimensional lattice, New J. Phys. 17, 123016 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    Cardarelli, S

    L. Cardarelli, S. Greschner, and L. Santos, Engineering interactions and anyon statistics by multicolor lattice- depth modulations, Phys. Rev. A94, 023615 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    Str¨ ater, S

    C. Str¨ ater, S. C. Srivastava, and A. Eckardt, Floquet realization and signatures of one-dimensional anyons in an optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 205303 (2016)

    2016

  20. [20]

    Agarwala, G

    A. Agarwala, G. K. Gupta, V. B. Shenoy, and S. Bhat- tacharjee, Statistics-tuned phases of pseudofermions in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B99, 165125 (2019)

    2019

  21. [21]

    Aditya and D

    S. Aditya and D. Sen, Bosonization study of a generalized statistics model with four Fermi points, Phys. Rev. B 103, 235162 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Brollo, A

    A. Brollo, A. Veronese, and L. Salasnich, Two-site any- onic Josephson junction, Phys. Rev. A106, 023308 (2022)

    2022

  23. [23]

    Fractional statistics

    F. D. M. Haldane, “Fractional statistics” in arbitrary dimensions: A generalization of the Pauli principle, Phys. 11 Rev. Lett.67, 937 (1991)

    1991

  24. [24]

    A. P. Polychronakos, Probabilities and path-integral re- alization of exclusion statistics, Physics Letters B365, 202 (1996)

    1996

  25. [25]

    Bartolomei, M

    H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Placais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser,et al., Fractional statistics in anyon collisions, Science368, 173 (2020)

    2020

  26. [26]

    S. J. Rabello, A gauge theory of one-dimensional anyons, Physics Letters B363, 180 (1995)

    1995

  27. [27]

    S. J. B. Rabello, 1d generalized statistics gas: A gauge theory approach, Phys. Rev. Lett.76, 4007 (1996)

    1996

  28. [28]

    J. Kwan, P. Segura, Y. Li, S. Kim, A. V. Gorshkov, A. Eckardt, B. Bakkali-Hassani, and M. Greiner, Realiza- tion of one-dimensional anyons with arbitrary statistical phase, Science386, 1055 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Roushan, C

    P. Roushan, C. Neill, A. Megrant, Y. Chen, R. Bab- bush, R. Barends, B. Campbell, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth,et al., Chiral ground-state currents of in- teracting photons in a synthetic magnetic field, Nature Physics13, 146 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    L. W. Clark, B. M. Anderson, L. Feng, A. Gaj, K. Levin, and C. Chin, Observation of density-dependent gauge fields in a Bose-Einstein condensate based on micromo- tion control in a shaken two-dimensional lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 030402 (2018)

    2018

  31. [31]

    Lienhard, P

    V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, S. Weber, D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, R. Bai, N. Lang, M. Fleischhauer, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye,et al., Realization of a density- dependent Peierls phase in a synthetic, spin-orbit coupled Rydberg system, Phys. Rev. X10, 021031 (2020)

    2020

  32. [32]

    K.-X. Yao, Z. Zhang, and C. Chin, Domain-wall dynam- ics in Bose–Einstein condensates with synthetic gauge fields, Nature602, 68 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Fr¨ olian, C

    A. Fr¨ olian, C. S. Chisholm, E. Neri, C. R. Cabrera, R. Ramos, A. Celi, and L. Tarruell, Realizing a 1d topo- logical gauge theory in an optically dressed BEC, Nature 608, 293 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Arik and D

    M. Arik and D. D. Coon, Hilbert spaces of analytic func- tions and generalized coherent states, J. Math. Phys.17, 524 (1976)

    1976

  35. [35]

    Biedenharn, The quantum groupSU q(2) and aq- analogue of the boson operators, J

    L. Biedenharn, The quantum groupSU q(2) and aq- analogue of the boson operators, J. Phys. A22, L873 (1989)

    1989

  36. [36]

    Zagier, Realizability of a model in infinite statis- tics, Communications in Mathematical Physics147, 199 (1992)

    D. Zagier, Realizability of a model in infinite statis- tics, Communications in Mathematical Physics147, 199 (1992)

    1992

  37. [37]

    Greenberg, Example of infinite statistics, Phys

    O. Greenberg, Example of infinite statistics, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 705 (1990)

    1990

  38. [38]

    D. I. Fivel, Interpolation between Fermi and Bose statis- tics using generalized commutators, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 3361 (1990)

    1990

  39. [39]

    Greenberg, Particles with small violations of Fermi or Bose statistics, Phys

    O. Greenberg, Particles with small violations of Fermi or Bose statistics, Phys. Rev. D43, 4111 (1991)

    1991

  40. [40]

    Bo˙ zejko and R

    M. Bo˙ zejko and R. Speicher, An example of a general- ized Brownian motion, Communications in Mathematical Physics137, 519 (1991)

    1991

  41. [41]

    Chaturvedi, A

    S. Chaturvedi, A. Kapoor, R. Sandhya, V. Srinivasan, and R. Simon, Generalized commutation relations for a single-mode oscillator, Phys. Rev. A43, 4555 (1991)

    1991

  42. [42]

    Macfarlane, Onq-analogues of the quantum harmonic oscillator and the quantum groupSU q(2), J

    A. Macfarlane, Onq-analogues of the quantum harmonic oscillator and the quantum groupSU q(2), J. Phys. A22, 4581 (1989)

    1989

  43. [43]

    Yan,q-deformed oscillator algebra as a quantum group, J

    H. Yan,q-deformed oscillator algebra as a quantum group, J. Phys. A23, L1155 (1990)

    1990

  44. [44]

    Chaichian, R

    M. Chaichian, R. G. Felipe, and C. Montonen, Statistics ofq-oscillators, quons and relations to fractional statis- tics, J. Phys. A26, 4017 (1993)

    1993

  45. [45]

    Narayana Swamy, Interpolating statistics andq- deformed oscillator algebras, Int

    P. Narayana Swamy, Interpolating statistics andq- deformed oscillator algebras, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B20, 697 (2006)

    2006

  46. [46]

    Bhasin and T

    P. Bhasin and T. Das, A Hermitian bypass to the non- Hermitian quantum theory, J. Phys. A58, 125303 (2025)

    2025

  47. [47]

    Using polar decomposition, we can writeC i =U i|Ci|, where |Ci|= q C † i Ci is invertible, andU i is a unitary operator

    The prescribed algebra stems from a more general consid- eration ofb ib† j −eiθb† jbi =C iδij whereC i ̸=C † i ̸=I. Using polar decomposition, we can writeC i =U i|Ci|, where |Ci|= q C † i Ci is invertible, andU i is a unitary operator. WritingU i =e −iθ ˆNi whereN i is a Hermitian operator and rescalingb i → |C i|−1/2bi, we arrive at Eq. (1a)

  48. [48]

    Kalmeyer and R

    V. Kalmeyer and R. Laughlin, Equivalence of the resonating-valence-bond and fractional quantum hall states, Physical review letters59, 2095 (1987)

    2095

  49. [49]

    X.-G. Wen, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, Chiral spin states and superconductivity, Physical Review B39, 11413 (1989)

    1989

  50. [50]

    Gorohovsky, R

    G. Gorohovsky, R. G. Pereira, and E. Sela, Chiral spin liquids in arrays of spin chains, Physical Review B91, 245139 (2015)

    2015

  51. [51]

    Ferraz, F

    G. Ferraz, F. B. Ramos, R. Egger, and R. G. Pereira, Spin chain network construction of chiral spin liquids, Physical Review Letters123, 137202 (2019)

    2019

  52. [52]

    Wen, Quantum field theory of many-body systems: From the origin of sound to an origin of light and elec- trons (Oxford University Press, 2004)

    X.-G. Wen, Quantum field theory of many-body systems: From the origin of sound to an origin of light and elec- trons (Oxford University Press, 2004)

    2004

  53. [53]

    Yang, J.-H

    S. Yang, J.-H. Zheng, and T. Yang, Fidelity study of the quantum phase transition in the one-dimensional spin- 1 xxz model in the thermodynamic limit, Phys. Rev. B 111, 134436 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    H.-K. Tang, M. A. Marashli, and W. C. Yu, Unveiling quantum phase transitions by fidelity mapping, Phys. Rev. B104, 075142 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    M. J. Edmonds, M. Valiente, G. Juzeli¯ unas, L. Santos, and P. ¨Ohberg, Simulating an interacting gauge theory with ultracold Bose gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 085301 (2013)

    2013

  56. [56]

    Wang and K

    Z. Wang and K. R. A. Hazzard, Particle exchange statis- tics beyond fermions and bosons, Nature637, 314 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Jordan and E

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, ¨Uber das Paulische ¨Aquivalenzverbot, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik47, 631 (1928)

    1928

  58. [58]

    D. J. Thouless and Q. Li, Ring exchange and the frac- tional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B36, 4581 (1987)

    1987