arxiv: 2605.04723 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 💻 cs.IR · cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

Rethinking Convolutional Networks for Attribute-Aware Sequential Recommendation

Shereen Elsayed , Ngoc Son Le , Ahmed Rashed , Lars Schmidt-Thieme

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IR cs.LG

keywords sequential recommendationconvolutional networksattribute-aware recommendationuser sequence modelingefficient recommendationnext-item predictionhierarchical aggregation

0 comments

The pith

Convolutional layers with hierarchical down-scaling can model user sequences for attribute-aware recommendation more efficiently than self-attention.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that self-attention, the dominant way to turn a user's past interactions into a single representation for next-item prediction, carries quadratic costs that block long histories and may not be the best pattern extractor. It offers ConvRec as a direct substitute: convolutional layers stacked in a down-scaling hierarchy that gradually aggregate neighboring items into compact yet expressive sequence vectors while keeping both computation and memory linear. Item attributes are carried along at every level. Experiments on four real datasets indicate the method not only runs faster but also yields higher accuracy than current attention-based recommenders.

Core claim

ConvRec replaces the full-sequence self-attention block with a stack of convolutional layers that down-scale and aggregate neighboring items step by step; each layer produces a shorter, richer representation that incorporates item attributes, resulting in an overall linear-cost encoder whose final output is used for next-item scoring.

What carries the argument

Hierarchical convolutional aggregation: successive 1-D convolution layers that pool neighboring items while halving sequence length at each stage to build multi-scale sequence features.

If this is right

Models can ingest user histories of arbitrary length without quadratic memory growth.
Convolutional aggregation can extract sequential patterns at least as effectively as attention for next-item prediction.
Attribute information flows through the entire hierarchy without extra quadratic overhead.
Deployment becomes feasible on longer histories or resource-constrained devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same down-scaling hierarchy could be tested on other sequence tasks such as session-based forecasting or time-series anomaly detection.
A hybrid that inserts attention only at the coarsest scale might combine the efficiency gain with any remaining long-range benefits.
Ablating the number of hierarchy levels would reveal the minimal depth needed to match attention performance on each dataset.

Load-bearing premise

Down-scaling neighboring items through successive convolutions preserves the long-term preference signals and diverse patterns that full attention would have captured.

What would settle it

On a dataset of users with histories longer than those tested, measure whether ConvRec's next-item accuracy falls below an attention baseline once the down-scaled representation loses a critical distant interaction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04723 by Ahmed Rashed, Lars Schmidt-Thieme, Ngoc Son Le, Shereen Elsayed.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Illustration of the self-attention versus the down-scaling view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Item encoding module. preferences and enhance the model’s ability to accurately predict the next item. For a given input sequence of fixed length L (obtained through either padding or truncation), each item’s features are passed through a fully connected layer: a ′u i = a u i Wa + ba (1) Wa ∈ R |A|×da is a weight matrix, |A| is the length of the item’s features set, da is the embedding dimension of the in… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The ConvRec framework. The 1D convolution is applied across the sequence dimension (L) using a specified kernel size and stride. In most cases, the stride is set equal to the kernel size to ensure nonoverlapping windows, which empirically yielded better performance. When the sequence length is not divisible by the kernel size, appropriate padding is applied to maintain dimensional consistency. After co… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Comparison of memory usage and execution time between ConvRec and ProxyRCA models at batch size 128. view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Effect of changing embedding size and dropout on model view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Attribute-aware sequential recommendation entails predicting the next item a user will interact with based on a chronologically ordered history of past interactions, enriched with item attributes. Existing methods typically leverage self-attention mechanisms to aggregate the entire sequence into a unified representation used for next-item prediction. While effective, these models often suffer from high computational complexity and memory consumption, limiting their ability to process long user histories. This constraint restricts the model's capacity to fully capture long-term user preferences. In some scenarios, modeling item interactions purely through attention may also not be the most effective approach to extract sequential patterns. In this work, we propose ConvRec, an alternative method with linear computational and memory complexity that employs convolutional layers in a hierarchical, down-scaled fashion to generate compact, yet expressive sequence representations. To further enhance the model's ability to capture diverse sequential patterns, each layer aggregates the neighboring items gradually to reach a comprehensive sequence representation. Extensive experiments on four real-world datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art sequential recommendation models, highlighting the potential of convolution-based architectures for efficient and effective sequence modeling in recommendation systems. Our implementation code and datasets are available here https://github.com/ismll-research/ConvRec.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

ConvRec swaps self-attention for hierarchical convolutions to get linear complexity on long attribute-aware sequences, but the abstract leaves the performance claims and long-range preservation details thin.

read the letter

ConvRec replaces self-attention with stacked convolutional layers that progressively aggregate neighbors and down-scale the sequence to produce a compact representation for next-item prediction. The linear complexity is the practical hook, since it lets the model handle longer histories than quadratic attention without blowing up memory or time on large datasets. The paper also releases code and data, which is useful for anyone wanting to test the design directly. Attribute integration happens through the same convolutional path, keeping the architecture simple rather than bolting on extra modules. That is the actual new piece: a specific hierarchical down-scaling recipe tuned for this recommendation setting rather than a generic conv application. The reported outperformance on four real-world datasets is the central evidence offered. If the gains hold under standard metrics and fair baselines, the efficiency angle would matter for deployment where history length is currently capped. The main soft spot is the lack of concrete numbers, statistical tests, or ablation breakdowns in the abstract, so the strength of the improvement is hard to judge from the summary alone. The down-scaling steps could lose sparse long-range signals before they reach the final layer, and without visible skip connections or multi-scale fusion the architecture does not obviously guard against that. Checking the full experimental section and any analysis of sequence length effects would clarify whether this is a real limitation or not. This paper is for researchers and engineers working on scalable sequential recommenders who already know the attention cost problem and want a concrete conv alternative to try. Readers focused on practical efficiency trade-offs rather than theoretical novelty would get the most from it. The work is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee, even if the experiments will need more detail and the long-range preservation claim will need scrutiny during review. I would send it to peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes ConvRec, a convolutional architecture for attribute-aware sequential recommendation that replaces self-attention with hierarchical, down-scaled convolutional layers performing progressive neighbor aggregation. This design is claimed to achieve linear complexity while still capturing long-term user preferences and diverse sequential patterns, with extensive experiments on four real-world datasets showing outperformance over state-of-the-art sequential models. Code and datasets are released.

Significance. If the results hold, the work is significant for showing that carefully designed convolutional networks can match or exceed attention-based models in sequential recommendation while scaling linearly, which is particularly relevant for long user histories. The public release of code and datasets strengthens the contribution by enabling direct reproducibility and follow-up work.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (Architecture): The hierarchical down-scaling and local neighbor aggregation lack any described mechanism (residual links, multi-scale fusion, or global mixing) to preserve non-local or sparse long-range dependencies; because the central claim that ConvRec captures long-term preferences at least as well as self-attention rests on this not occurring, an explicit justification or ablation isolating information retention across down-scaling steps is required.
[§5] §5 (Experiments): The reported outperformance on four datasets is the primary evidence for the architecture's effectiveness, yet the section provides insufficient detail on statistical significance testing, exact baseline re-implementations, hyper-parameter search protocols, or ablations that isolate the hierarchical down-scaling component; without these, it is impossible to determine whether the gains are robust or merely due to implementation differences.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the model 'outperforms state-of-the-art' but does not name the specific metrics (e.g., HR@10, NDCG@10) or list the four datasets; adding these would improve immediate readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional justifications, descriptions, and experimental details as outlined.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Architecture): The hierarchical down-scaling and local neighbor aggregation lack any described mechanism (residual links, multi-scale fusion, or global mixing) to preserve non-local or sparse long-range dependencies; because the central claim that ConvRec captures long-term preferences at least as well as self-attention rests on this not occurring, an explicit justification or ablation isolating information retention across down-scaling steps is required.

Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for clearer exposition on long-range dependency preservation. The design in Section 3 relies on successive convolutional layers with down-scaling to progressively expand the receptive field: each layer aggregates local neighbors, and down-scaling combines these into higher-level features that incorporate information from farther positions in the original sequence. This gradual aggregation is intended to build comprehensive representations without explicit global mixing. To strengthen the manuscript, we will add an explicit analysis of receptive-field growth across layers (including a formula or diagram) and include a new ablation comparing the full hierarchical model against a non-downscaled convolutional baseline to isolate retention of long-range signals. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (Experiments): The reported outperformance on four datasets is the primary evidence for the architecture's effectiveness, yet the section provides insufficient detail on statistical significance testing, exact baseline re-implementations, hyper-parameter search protocols, or ablations that isolate the hierarchical down-scaling component; without these, it is impossible to determine whether the gains are robust or merely due to implementation differences.

Authors: We agree that greater experimental transparency is warranted. In the revised manuscript we will augment Section 5 (and the appendix) with: (i) statistical significance results using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests over multiple random seeds; (ii) precise descriptions of baseline re-implementations, including source code references, any adaptations performed, and the hyper-parameter values used; (iii) the complete hyper-parameter search protocol (grid ranges, validation split, and selection criterion); and (iv) targeted ablations that remove or vary only the hierarchical down-scaling component while keeping other factors fixed. These additions will allow readers to assess robustness directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical validation only

full rationale

The paper introduces ConvRec as a hierarchical convolutional architecture for attribute-aware sequential recommendation and supports its claims solely through experimental comparisons on four datasets. No derivation chain, equations, or parameter-fitting steps are described that reduce a claimed prediction or result back to the model's own inputs by construction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked as load-bearing justifications in the abstract or described architecture. The central performance claims rest on external empirical benchmarks rather than any self-referential or fitted-input logic.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard domain assumptions that user interaction sequences contain predictable patterns and that item attributes provide useful signals; no free parameters, axioms beyond standard math, or invented entities are described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1103 out tokens · 57790 ms · 2026-05-08T16:29:57.244949+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation

[Choet al., 2014 ] Kyunghyun Cho, Bart Van Merri ¨enboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder-decoder for statistical machine translation.arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014
[2]

Ticoserec: Augmenting data to uniform sequences by time intervals for effective recom- mendation.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 36(6):2686–2700,

[Danget al., 2023 ] Yizhou Dang, Enneng Yang, Guibing Guo, Linying Jiang, Xingwei Wang, Xiaoxiao Xu, Qinghui Sun, and Hong Liu. Ticoserec: Augmenting data to uniform sequences by time intervals for effective recom- mendation.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 36(6):2686–2700,

2023
[3]

End-to-end image-based fash- ion recommendation

[Elsayedet al., 2022 ] Shereen Elsayed, Lukas Brinkmeyer, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. End-to-end image-based fash- ion recommendation. InWorkshop on Recommender Sys- tems in Fashion and Retail, pages 109–119. Springer,

2022
[4]

Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)

[Hendrycks and Gimpel, 2016] Dan Hendrycks and Kevin Gimpel. Gaussian error linear units (gelus).arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.08415,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2016
[5]

Recurrent neural networks with top-k gains for session-based recommendations

[Hidasi and Karatzoglou, 2018] Bal´azs Hidasi and Alexan- dros Karatzoglou. Recurrent neural networks with top-k gains for session-based recommendations. InProceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, pages 843–852,

2018
[6]

When recurrent neural networks meet the neigh- borhood for session-based recommendation

[Jannach and Ludewig, 2017] Dietmar Jannach and Malte Ludewig. When recurrent neural networks meet the neigh- borhood for session-based recommendation. InProceed- ings of the eleventh ACM conference on recommender sys- tems, pages 306–310,

2017
[7]

Self-attentive sequential recommendation

[Kang and McAuley, 2018] Wang-Cheng Kang and Julian McAuley. Self-attentive sequential recommendation. In2018 IEEE international conference on data mining (ICDM), pages 197–206. IEEE,

2018
[8]

Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization

[Kingma and Ba, 2014] Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization.arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014
[9]

Matrix factorization techniques for recom- mender systems.Computer, 42(8):30–37,

[Korenet al., 2009 ] Yehuda Koren, Robert Bell, and Chris V olinsky. Matrix factorization techniques for recom- mender systems.Computer, 42(8):30–37,

2009
[10]

Time interval aware self-attention for sequen- tial recommendation

[Liet al., 2020 ] Jiacheng Li, Yujie Wang, and Julian McAuley. Time interval aware self-attention for sequen- tial recommendation. InProceedings of the 13th interna- tional conference on web search and data mining, pages 322–330,

2020
[11]

Fea- ture pyramid networks for object detection

[Linet al., 2017 ] Tsung-Yi Lin, Piotr Doll´ar, Ross Girshick, Kaiming He, Bharath Hariharan, and Serge Belongie. Fea- ture pyramid networks for object detection. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 2117–2125,

2017
[12]

Multi-sequence attentive user representation learning for side-information integrated sequential recom- mendation

[Linet al., 2024 ] Xiaolin Lin, Jinwei Luo, Junwei Pan, Weike Pan, Zhong Ming, Xun Liu, Shudong Huang, and Jie Jiang. Multi-sequence attentive user representation learning for side-information integrated sequential recom- mendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 414– 423,

2024
[13]

Yu, Julian McAuley, and Caiming Xiong

[Liuet al., 2021b ] Zhiwei Liu, Yongjun Chen, Jia Li, Philip S Yu, Julian McAuley, and Caiming Xiong. Con- trastive self-supervised sequential recommendation with robust augmentation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.06479,

work page arXiv
[14]

Scinet: Time series modeling and forecasting with sample convo- lution and interaction.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:5816–5828,

[Liuet al., 2022 ] Minhao Liu, Ailing Zeng, Muxi Chen, Zhi- jian Xu, Qiuxia Lai, Lingna Ma, and Qiang Xu. Scinet: Time series modeling and forecasting with sample convo- lution and interaction.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:5816–5828,

2022
[15]

Pytorch: An imperative style, high- performance deep learning library

[Paszkeet al., 2019 ] Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, Alban Desmaison, Andreas Kopf, Edward Yang, Zachary DeVito, Martin Raison, Alykhan Tejani, Sasank Chilamkurthy, Benoit Steiner, Lu Fang, Junjie Bai, and Soumith Chintala. Pytorch: An impera...

2019
[16]

Context and attribute-aware se- quential recommendation via cross-attention

[Rashedet al., 2022 ] Ahmed Rashed, Shereen Elsayed, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. Context and attribute-aware se- quential recommendation via cross-attention. InProceed- ings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Sys- tems, pages 71–80,

2022
[17]

Factorizing personal- ized markov chains for next-basket recommendation

[Rendleet al., 2010 ] Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freuden- thaler, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. Factorizing personal- ized markov chains for next-basket recommendation. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web, pages 811–820,

2010
[18]

BPR: Bayesian Personalized Ranking from Implicit Feedback

[Rendleet al., 2012 ] Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freuden- thaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. Bpr: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2618,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2012
[19]

Proxy-based item representation for attribute and context-aware recommendation

[Seolet al., 2024 ] Jinseok Seol, Minseok Gang, Sang-goo Lee, and Jaehui Park. Proxy-based item representation for attribute and context-aware recommendation. InProceed- ings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pages 616–625,

2024
[20]

An mdp-based recommender system

[Shaniet al., 2005 ] Guy Shani, David Heckerman, and Ro- nen I Brafman. An mdp-based recommender system. Journal of machine Learning research, 6(Sep):1265–1295,

2005
[21]

Bert4rec: Se- quential recommendation with bidirectional encoder rep- resentations from transformer

[Sunet al., 2019 ] Fei Sun, Jun Liu, Jian Wu, Changhua Pei, Xiao Lin, Wenwu Ou, and Peng Jiang. Bert4rec: Se- quential recommendation with bidirectional encoder rep- resentations from transformer. InProceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and knowl- edge management, pages 1441–1450,

2019
[22]

Person- alized top-n sequential recommendation via convolutional sequence embedding

[Tang and Wang, 2018] Jiaxi Tang and Ke Wang. Person- alized top-n sequential recommendation via convolutional sequence embedding. InProceedings of the eleventh ACM international conference on web search and data mining, pages 565–573,

2018
[23]

Next-item rec- ommendation with sequential hypergraphs

[Wanget al., 2020 ] Jianling Wang, Kaize Ding, Liangjie Hong, Huan Liu, and James Caverlee. Next-item rec- ommendation with sequential hypergraphs. InProceed- ings of the 43rd international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pages 1101–1110,

2020
[24]

Timemixer++: A general time series pattern machine for universal predictive analysis

[Wanget al., 2024 ] Shiyu Wang, Jiawei Li, Xiaoming Shi, Zhou Ye, Baichuan Mo, Wenze Lin, Shengtong Ju, Zhix- uan Chu, and Ming Jin. Timemixer++: A general time series pattern machine for universal predictive analysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16032,

work page arXiv 2024
[25]

Decoupled side information fusion for sequential recom- mendation

[Xieet al., 2022 ] Yueqi Xie, Peilin Zhou, and Sunghun Kim. Decoupled side information fusion for sequential recom- mendation. InProceedings of the 45th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in infor- mation retrieval, pages 1611–1621,

2022
[26]

Sheng, Zhiming Cui, Xiaofang Zhou, and Hui Xiong

[Xuet al., 2019 ] Chengfeng Xu, Pengpeng Zhao, Yanchi Liu, Jiajie Xu, Victor S Sheng S. Sheng, Zhiming Cui, Xiaofang Zhou, and Hui Xiong. Recurrent convolutional neural network for sequential recommendation. InThe world wide web conference, pages 3398–3404,

2019
[27]

Heterogeneous graph transfer learning for category-aware cross-domain sequential recommendation

[Xuet al., 2025 ] Zitao Xu, Xiaoqing Chen, Weike Pan, and Zhong Ming. Heterogeneous graph transfer learning for category-aware cross-domain sequential recommendation. InTHE WEB CONFERENCE 2025,

2025
[28]

Cosrec: 2d convo- lutional neural networks for sequential recommendation

[Yanet al., 2019 ] An Yan, Shuo Cheng, Wang-Cheng Kang, Mengting Wan, and Julian McAuley. Cosrec: 2d convo- lutional neural networks for sequential recommendation. InProceedings of the 28th ACM international conference on information and knowledge management, pages 2173– 2176,

2019
[29]

S3-rec: Self-supervised learn- ing for sequential recommendation with mutual informa- tion maximization

[Zhouet al., 2020 ] Kun Zhou, Hui Wang, Wayne Xin Zhao, Yutao Zhu, Sirui Wang, Fuzheng Zhang, Zhongyuan Wang, and Ji-Rong Wen. S3-rec: Self-supervised learn- ing for sequential recommendation with mutual informa- tion maximization. InProceedings of the 29th ACM Inter- national Conference on Information & Knowledge Man- agement, pages 1893–1902,

2020
[30]

100 200 300 400 500 Embedding size 0.59 0.60 0.61 0.62 0.63HR@10 ConvRec 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50 Dropout 0.6150 0.6175 0.6200 0.6225 0.6250 0.6275 0.6300HR@10 ConvRec Figure 5: Effect of changing embedding size and dropout on model performance. B User-group Evaluation Varying sequence length.Since the maximum sequence length significa...

work page arXiv 2019