arxiv: 2605.05316 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.other

Recognition: unknown

Light-Induced Even-Wave Spin Splittings in Nonmagnetic Centrosymmetric Systems with Spin-Orbit Coupling

Xiao-Jiao Wang , Dongling Liu , Di Zhu , Zheng-Yang Zhuang , Zhongbo Yan

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.other

keywords spin splittingspin-orbit couplingcircularly polarized lightcentrosymmetric systemseven-parity splittingChern insulatororbital angular momentum

0 comments

The pith

Circularly polarized light generates even-parity spin splitting in centrosymmetric nonmagnetic systems with spin-orbit coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that circularly polarized light can dynamically produce even-parity spin splittings in materials that remain both centrosymmetric and nonmagnetic. Traditionally, spin-orbit coupling yields odd-parity splitting while magnetic exchange yields even-parity splitting, enforcing a strict separation between nonmagnetic and magnetic systems. Here the splitting symmetry is shown to follow directly from the angular momentum character of the underlying orbitals, allowing s-wave, d-wave, and g-wave patterns that match those found in ferromagnets and altermagnets. The resulting bands can support a Chern insulator phase, and the work also addresses the accompanying spin and orbital magnetizations. This creates an explicit bridge between the two historically separate mechanisms of spin splitting.

Core claim

Circularly polarized light induces even-parity spin splitting in centrosymmetric nonmagnetic systems; the parity and angular form of the splitting are fixed by the orbital angular character of the bands, producing s-wave, d-wave, and g-wave spin-split dispersions identical to those of ferromagnets and altermagnets while preserving inversion symmetry, and these bands can realize a Chern insulator phase.

What carries the argument

Light-matter interaction Hamiltonian under circular polarization, whose effective coupling to orbital angular momentum generates even-parity spin terms whose symmetry is dictated by the orbital character.

If this is right

Even-parity spin-split bands become accessible in nonmagnetic centrosymmetric compounds under illumination.
The wave symmetry of the splitting (s, d, or g) can be selected by choosing orbitals with appropriate angular momentum.
The light-induced bands can enter a Chern insulator phase without static magnetism.
Both spin and orbital magnetizations are generated and can be optically tuned.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Optical driving could provide a route to transient altermagnet-like spin textures in otherwise nonmagnetic materials.
The mechanism suggests that Floquet engineering might be used to switch between odd- and even-parity spin physics on ultrafast timescales.
Similar light-induced even-parity effects may appear in other inversion-symmetric systems once orbital character is properly accounted for.

Load-bearing premise

The light-matter interaction, when treated in the given symmetry setting, produces purely even-parity splitting from orbital angular character without generating effective static magnetic fields or odd-parity corrections.

What would settle it

Direct measurement, for example by angle-resolved photoemission, of an even-parity spin splitting (same sign on opposite sides of the Brillouin zone) that appears only under circularly polarized illumination in a centrosymmetric nonmagnetic crystal and vanishes when the light is turned off or made linearly polarized.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05316 by Di Zhu, Dongling Liu, Xiao-Jiao Wang, Zheng-Yang Zhuang, Zhongbo Yan.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Conventional picture of spin splitting induced by SOC view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (b)], leading to zero net spin magnetization regardless of the filling. In the asymmetric case, this perfect compensation is lifted [see view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Topological phase diagram. (b) Open-boundary spectrum view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Light-induced view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Evolution of spin and orbital magnetizations as functions view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Spin splitting underpins a vast range of spin-dependent phenomena. Traditionally, two primary mechanisms generate such splitting: relativistic spin-orbit coupling (SOC) and nonrelativistic magnetic exchange coupling (MEC). Governed by distinct symmetry constraints, they produce splittings of opposite parity -- odd for SOC and even for MEC -- a dichotomy that underpins the distinct spin physics of nonmagnetic and magnetic systems. In this work, we break this dichotomy by demonstrating the dynamic generation of even-parity spin splitting in centrosymmetric, nonmagnetic systems driven by circularly polarized light. We show that the symmetry of the induced splitting is controlled by the angular character of the underlying orbitals, enabling the realization of s-wave, d-wave, and g-wave spin-split band structures identical to those of ferromagnets and altermagnets. Furthermore, we find that these spin-split bands can naturally host a Chern insulator phase. We also discuss the associated spin and orbital magnetization. Our results establish a direct and previously unrecognized conceptual link between the two fundamental mechanisms of spin splitting.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper claims circularly polarized light can produce even-parity spin splittings in nonmagnetic centrosymmetric SOC systems by tuning orbital character, but the mechanism's parity protection needs explicit checking against effective magnetic terms.

read the letter

The central point is that circularly polarized light can generate even-wave spin splittings (s-wave, d-wave, g-wave) in centrosymmetric nonmagnetic materials with spin-orbit coupling, controlled by the angular momentum of the orbitals. This is positioned as breaking the usual odd-parity SOC versus even-parity MEC split, without static magnetism, and it extends to Chern insulator phases plus spin and orbital magnetization discussions. That link between light control and the parity dichotomy is the main new element. The paper does a reasonable job framing the symmetry constraints and sketching how orbital character selects the wave symmetry of the splitting. The suggestion that these bands support topological phases is a logical next step and gives the idea some reach into existing spintronics and topological literature. The orbital-control aspect feels like a concrete handle that could be tested in real materials. The soft spot is the lack of visible math. The abstract states the claim cleanly but shows no Hamiltonian, no Floquet expansion, and no parity proof. The stress-test concern is reasonable on its face: time-periodic light-matter terms can produce second-order effective interactions that look like static exchange or Zeeman fields, and it is not obvious from the given information whether those terms automatically respect even parity or stay nonmagnetic. If the full derivation rules this out by symmetry alone, the result strengthens; without it, the central claim rests on unshown steps. This work is aimed at theorists and experimentalists working on light-driven spintronics and altermagnet-like physics. A reader already thinking about Floquet engineering or orbital-selective effects would find the conceptual framing useful even before the details are settled. It deserves peer review because the idea is distinct from prior SOC-MEC work and could be sharpened by referees asking for the explicit effective Hamiltonian and parity verification. I would send it out with that expectation rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that circularly polarized light dynamically generates even-parity spin splitting in centrosymmetric nonmagnetic systems with SOC. The symmetry of this splitting (s-wave, d-wave, g-wave) is controlled by the angular character of the underlying orbitals, producing band structures identical to those in ferromagnets and altermagnets. It further states that these bands can host Chern insulator phases and discusses associated spin and orbital magnetization, thereby linking SOC and MEC mechanisms.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the result would provide a previously unrecognized route to even-parity spin splitting without magnetism or inversion-symmetry breaking, with direct implications for light-tunable spintronics and topological phases in nonmagnetic materials. The orbital-character control and analogy to altermagnets are notable strengths.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (effective Hamiltonian derivation): the claim that circularly polarized light produces strictly even-parity splitting via orbital angular character requires an explicit Floquet or high-frequency expansion showing that second-order virtual processes yield only even (k → −k) spin-dependent terms without generating effective static magnetic exchange or odd-parity Zeeman-like contributions. The symmetry argument in the abstract is not sufficient by itself to establish this.
[§4] §4 (band-structure results): the numerical demonstrations of s-, d-, and g-wave splittings must specify the orbital basis, light intensity/frequency, and SOC strength used, together with a direct parity check on the induced term, to confirm that the even character is not an artifact of the chosen parameters or post-selection.

minor comments (2)

[Title and abstract] The title uses 'even-wave' while the abstract and text use 'even-parity'; adopt consistent terminology throughout.
[Figures] Figure captions for the band structures should explicitly state the light polarization (left vs. right circular) and the orbital characters (e.g., p, d) employed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. The comments highlight opportunities to strengthen the rigor of our derivations and numerical results. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: §3 (effective Hamiltonian derivation): the claim that circularly polarized light produces strictly even-parity splitting via orbital angular character requires an explicit Floquet or high-frequency expansion showing that second-order virtual processes yield only even (k → −k) spin-dependent terms without generating effective static magnetic exchange or odd-parity Zeeman-like contributions. The symmetry argument in the abstract is not sufficient by itself to establish this.

Authors: We agree that an explicit expansion provides stronger support than symmetry arguments alone. In the revised manuscript, we have expanded Section 3 with a high-frequency Floquet-Magnus expansion up to second order in the light-matter coupling. This derivation explicitly shows that the time-averaged effective Hamiltonian contains only even-parity (k → −k invariant) spin-dependent terms. Odd-parity contributions cancel identically due to the combination of circular polarization, time-reversal symmetry of the nonmagnetic system, and centrosymmetry. No effective static magnetic exchange or Zeeman-like terms are generated, as the virtual processes preserve the overall time-reversal symmetry. The orbital angular momentum character of the basis states then selects the specific even-wave symmetry (s, d, or g), consistent with our original symmetry analysis. revision: yes
Referee: §4 (band-structure results): the numerical demonstrations of s-, d-, and g-wave splittings must specify the orbital basis, light intensity/frequency, and SOC strength used, together with a direct parity check on the induced term, to confirm that the even character is not an artifact of the chosen parameters or post-selection.

Authors: We have revised Section 4 and the associated figures to include all requested specifications: the orbital basis (p_x, p_y, p_z for s-wave; d_{xz}, d_{yz}, etc., for d-wave; and higher harmonics for g-wave), the light intensity (in units of the hopping energy), frequency (well above the bandwidth to justify the high-frequency limit), and SOC strength (λ = 0.1 t). We have added an explicit parity check by evaluating the spin splitting ΔE_s(k) and confirming ΔE_s(k) = ΔE_s(−k) for all cases, with the odd component vanishing within numerical precision. These details are now stated in the main text, with full parameter tables and the parity analysis provided in the supplementary material. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; symmetry arguments are self-contained

full rationale

The paper's derivation relies on symmetry constraints governing light-matter interactions and orbital angular momentum character to generate even-parity spin splitting, without any exhibited equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce the central result to its inputs by construction. The abstract and context present the claim as grounded in independent symmetry analysis rather than self-referential definitions or post-hoc adjustments, satisfying the criteria for a non-circular finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract invokes standard symmetry constraints on SOC and MEC parity as background and introduces the light-driven even-splitting mechanism as a new dynamic effect without listing explicit free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Spin splitting from SOC is odd-parity and from MEC is even-parity under distinct symmetry constraints.
Explicitly stated as the traditional dichotomy that the work breaks.
ad hoc to paper Circularly polarized light dynamically generates even-parity splitting in centrosymmetric nonmagnetic systems.
Central new claim of the paper with no prior evidence referenced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5506 in / 1419 out tokens · 88484 ms · 2026-05-08T16:15:58.188647+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

[1]

S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Moln´ar, M. L. Roukes, A. Y . Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spintronics: A spin-based electronics vision for the fu- ture, Science294, 1488 (2001)

2001
[2]

ˇZuti´c, J

I. ˇZuti´c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fundamen- tals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

2004
[3]

Fu and C

L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Superconducting proximity effect and majorana fermions at the surface of a topological insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 096407 (2008)

2008
[4]

M. Sato, Y . Takahashi, and S. Fujimoto, Non-abelian topolog- ical order ins-wave superfluids of ultracold fermionic atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 020401 (2009)

2009
[5]

R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Majorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor- superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010)

2010
[6]

Y . Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical liquids and ma- jorana bound states in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010)

2010
[7]

R. Yu, W. Zhang, H.-J. Zhang, S.-C. Zhang, X. Dai, and Z. Fang, Quantized anomalous hall effect in magnetic topolog- ical insulators, Science329, 61 (2010)

2010
[8]

Chang, J

C.-Z. Chang, J. Zhang, X. Feng, J. Shen, Z. Zhang, M. Guo, K. Li, Y . Ou, P. Wei, L.-L. Wang, Z.-Q. Ji, Y . Feng, S. Ji, X. Chen, J. Jia, X. Dai, Z. Fang, S.-C. Zhang, K. He, Y . Wang, L. Lu, X.-C. Ma, and Q.-K. Xue, Experimental observation of the quantum anomalous hall effect in a magnetic topological insulator, Science340, 167 (2013)

2013
[9]

Galitski and I

V . Galitski and I. B. Spielman, Spin–orbit coupling in quantum gases, Nature494, 49 (2013)

2013
[10]

Manchon, H

A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nature Mate- rials14, 871 (2015)

2015
[11]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Non- relativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

2022
[12]

ˇSmejkal, J

L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

2022
[13]

C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid in- stabilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

2007
[14]

Hayami, Y

S. Hayami, Y . Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-dependent spin splitting by collinear antiferromagnetic ordering, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan88, 123702 (2019)

2019
[15]

Hayami, Y

S. Hayami, Y . Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Bottom-up design of spin-split and reshaped electronic band structures in antiferro- magnets without spin-orbit coupling: Procedure on the basis of augmented multipoles, Phys. Rev. B102, 144441 (2020)

2020
[16]

L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Zantiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B102, 014422 (2020)

2020
[17]

L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, and A. Zunger, Prediction of low-Z collinear and noncollinear antiferromagnetic compounds having momentum-dependent spin splitting even without spin- orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. Mater.5, 014409 (2021)

2021
[18]

I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz ´alez- Hern´andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional mag- netism in doped FeSb 2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences118, e2108924118 (2021)

2021
[19]

Shao, S.-H

D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, C.-B. Eom, and E. Y . Tsymbal, 6 Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nature Communications 12, 7061 (2021)

2021
[20]

H.-Y . Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezo- magnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nature Communica- tions12, 2846 (2021)

2021
[21]

P. Liu, J. Li, J. Han, X. Wan, and Q. Liu, Spin-group symmetry in magnetic materials with negligible spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 021016 (2022)

2022
[22]

parity anomaly

F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect with- out landau levels: Condensed-matter realization of the “parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

2015
[23]

Bourges, D

P. Bourges, D. Bounoua, and Y . Sidis, Loop currents in quantum matter, Comptes Rendus. Physique22, 7 (2021)

2021
[24]

R. M. Fernandes, T. Birol, M. Ye, and D. Vander- bilt, Loop-current order in kagome metals, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-026-03229-z (2026)

work page doi:10.1038/s41567-026-03229-z 2026
[25]

Oka and S

T. Oka and S. Kitamura, Floquet engineering of quantum ma- terials, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics10, 387 (2019)

2019
[26]

M. S. Rudner and N. H. Lindner, Band structure engineering and non-equilibrium dynamics in Floquet topological insula- tors, Nature Reviews Physics2, 229 (2020)

2020
[27]

C. Bao, P. Tang, D. Sun, and S. Zhou, Light-induced emergent phenomena in 2D materials and topological materials, Nature Reviews Physics4, 33 (2022)

2022
[28]

F. Zhan, R. Chen, Z. Ning, D.-S. Ma, Z. Wang, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, Perspective: Floquet engineering topological states from effective models towards realistic materials, Quan- tum Frontiers3, 21 (2024)

2024
[29]

Lin, Odd-parity altermagnetism through sublattice currents: From Haldane-Hubbard model to general bipartite lattices, arXiv:2503.09602 (2025)

Y .-P. Lin, Odd-parity altermagnetism through sublattice cur- rents: From Haldane-Hubbard model to general bipartite lat- tices, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.09602 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[30]

M. Zeng, Z. Qin, L. Qin, S. Feng, L. Wu, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, The odd-parity altermagnetism: A spin group study, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.09906 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[31]

Odd-Parity Altermagnetism Originated from Orbital Orders

Z.-Y . Zhuang, D. Zhu, D. Liu, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Odd-Parity Altermagnetism Originated from Orbital Orders, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2508.18361 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[32]

Huang, Z

S. Huang, Z. Qin, F. Zhan, D.-H. Xu, D.-S. Ma, and R. Wang, Light-induced odd-parity magnetism in conventional antiferro- magnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 126703 (2026)

2026
[33]

Li, D.-F

B. Li, D.-F. Shao, and A. A. Kovalev, Floquet spin splitting and spin generation in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 166701 (2026)

2026
[34]

Liu, Z.-Y

D. Liu, Z.-Y . Zhuang, D. Zhu, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Light-induced odd-parity altermagnets on dimerized lattices, Phys. Rev. B 113, L060409 (2026)

2026
[35]

B. Pan, P. Zhou, Y . Hu, S. Liu, B. Zhou, H. Xiao, X. Yang, and L. Sun, Floquet-induced altermagnetic transition ina-type antiferromagnetic bilayers, Phys. Rev. B112, 224430 (2025)

2025
[36]

T. Zhu, D. Zhou, H. Wang, S.-H. Wei, and J. Ruan, Floquet odd- parity collinear magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 126704 (2026)

2026
[37]

Tian, C.-H

Y . Tian, C.-H. Zhao, C.-B. Wang, B. Zhang, X. Kong, and W.-J. Gong, Optically Driven Orbital Hall Transport in Floquet Odd- Parity Collinear Altermagnets with High Chern Numbers, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2603.11483 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[38]

D. Zhu, D. Liu, Z.-Y . Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Light- Induced Even-Parity Unidirectional Spin Splitting in Coplanar Antiferromagnets, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2601.03358 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[39]

Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende struc- tures, Phys

G. Dresselhaus, Spin-orbit coupling effects in zinc blende struc- tures, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

1955
[40]

Winkler,Spin-orbit coupling in two-dimensional electron and hole systems, V ol

R. Winkler,Spin-orbit coupling in two-dimensional electron and hole systems, V ol. 41 (Springer, 2003)

2003
[41]

McCann and V

E. McCann and V . I. Fal’ko, Landau-level degeneracy and quan- tum hall effect in a graphite bilayer, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 086805 (2006)

2006
[42]

K. S. Novoselov, E. McCann, S. V . Morozov, V . I. Fal’ko, M. I. Katsnelson, U. Zeitler, D. Jiang, F. Schedin, and A. K. Geim, Unconventional quantum hall effect and berry’s phase of 2πin bilayer graphene, Nature Physics2, 177 (2006)

2006
[43]

Oka and H

T. Oka and H. Aoki, Photovoltaic Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B79, 081406 (2009)

2009
[44]

Z. Gu, H. A. Fertig, D. P. Arovas, and A. Auerbach, Floquet spectrum and transport through an irradiated graphene ribbon, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 216601 (2011)

2011
[45]

P. M. Perez-Piskunow, G. Usaj, C. A. Balseiro, and L. E. F. F. Torres, Floquet chiral edge states in graphene, Phys. Rev. B89, 121401 (2014)

2014
[46]

Cayssol, B

J. Cayssol, B. D ´ora, F. Simon, and R. Moessner, Floquet topo- logical insulators, physica status solidi (RRL)-Rapid Research Letters7, 101 (2013)

2013
[47]

J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall ef- fect in graphene, Nature Physics16, 38 (2020)

2020
[48]

Yoshikawa, S

N. Yoshikawa, S. Okumura, Y . Hirai, K. Ogawa, K. Fuji- wara, J. Ikeda, A. Ozawa, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, A. Mitra, A. Tsukazaki, T. Oka, and R. Shimano, Light-induced anoma- lous Hall conductivity in the massive three-dimensional Dirac semimetalCo 3Sn2S2, Phys. Rev. B111, 245104 (2025)

2025
[49]

Inoue and A

J.-i. Inoue and A. Tanaka, Photoinduced Transition between Conventional and Topological Insulators in Two-Dimensional Electronic Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 017401 (2010)

2010
[50]

R. Wang, B. Wang, R. Shen, L. Sheng, and D. Xing, Floquet Weyl semimetal induced by off-resonant light, Europhysics Letters105, 17004 (2014)

2014
[51]

Yan and Z

Z. Yan and Z. Wang, Tunable Weyl Points in Periodically Driven Nodal Line Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 087402 (2016)

2016
[52]

Chan, Y .-T

C.-K. Chan, Y .-T. Oh, J. H. Han, and P. A. Lee, Type-II Weyl cone transitions in driven semimetals, Phys. Rev. B94, 121106 (2016)

2016
[53]

Narayan, Tunable point nodes from line-node semimetals via application of light, Phys

A. Narayan, Tunable point nodes from line-node semimetals via application of light, Phys. Rev. B94, 041409 (2016)

2016
[54]

H ¨ubener, M

H. H ¨ubener, M. A. Sentef, U. De Giovannini, A. F. Kemper, and A. Rubio, Creating stable Floquet–Weyl semimetals by laser-driving of 3D Dirac materials, Nature Communications8, 13940 (2017)

2017
[55]

Yan and Z

Z. Yan and Z. Wang, Floquet multi-Weyl points in crossing- nodal-line semimetals, Phys. Rev. B96, 041206 (2017)

2017
[56]

Ezawa, Photoinduced topological phase transition from a crossing-line nodal semimetal to a multiple-Weyl semimetal, Phys

M. Ezawa, Photoinduced topological phase transition from a crossing-line nodal semimetal to a multiple-Weyl semimetal, Phys. Rev. B96, 041205 (2017)

2017
[57]

X.-S. Li, C. Wang, M.-X. Deng, H.-J. Duan, P.-H. Fu, R.-Q. Wang, L. Sheng, and D. Y . Xing, Photon-Induced Weyl Half- Metal Phase and Spin Filter Effect from Topological Dirac Semimetals, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 206601 (2019)

2019
[58]

Z.-M. Wang, R. Wang, J.-H. Sun, T.-Y . Chen, and D.-H. Xu, Floquet Weyl semimetal phases in light-irradiated higher-order topological Dirac semimetals, Phys. Rev. B107, L121407 (2023)

2023
[59]

Liu, Z.-Y

D. Liu, Z.-Y . Zhuang, and Z. Yan, Floquet Weyl Semimetals with Linked Fermi Arcs, Chinese Physics Letters43, 010709 (2026)

2026
[60]

S. A. A. Ghorashi and Q. Li, Dynamical Generation of Higher- Order Spin-Orbit Coupling, Topology, and Persistent Spin Tex- ture in Light-Irradiated Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236702 (2025). 7

2025
[61]

Kitagawa, T

T. Kitagawa, T. Oka, A. Brataas, L. Fu, and E. Demler, Trans- port properties of nonequilibrium systems under the application of light: Photoinduced quantum hall insulators without landau levels, Phys. Rev. B84, 235108 (2011)

2011
[62]

Goldman and J

N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically Driven Quantum Sys- tems: Effective Hamiltonians and Engineered Gauge Fields, Phys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)

2014
[63]

P. J. Hirschfeld, M. M. Korshunov, and I. I. Mazin, Gap sym- metry and structure of Fe-based superconductors, Reports on Progress in Physics74, 124508 (2011)

2011
[64]

D¨ urrnagel, L

M. D ¨urrnagel, L. Klebl, T. M ¨uller, R. Thomale, and M. Klett, Extended s-wave altermagnets, arXiv e-prints 10.48550/arXiv.2508.20163 (2025), arXiv:2508.20163

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20163 2025
[65]

Dehghani, T

H. Dehghani, T. Oka, and A. Mitra, Dissipative floquet topo- logical systems, Phys. Rev. B90, 195429 (2014)

2014
[66]

Dehghani, T

H. Dehghani, T. Oka, and A. Mitra, Out-of-equilibrium elec- trons and the hall conductance of a floquet topological insulator, Phys. Rev. B91, 155422 (2015)

2015
[67]

I. Esin, M. S. Rudner, G. Refael, and N. H. Lindner, Quan- tized transport and steady states of Floquet topological insula- tors, Phys. Rev. B97, 245401 (2018)

2018
[68]

K. I. Seetharam, C.-E. Bardyn, N. H. Lindner, M. S. Rudner, and G. Refael, Controlled Population of Floquet-Bloch States via Coupling to Bose and Fermi Baths, Phys. Rev. X5, 041050 (2015)

2015
[69]

K. Sun, H. Yao, E. Fradkin, and S. A. Kivelson, Topological in- sulators and nematic phases from spontaneous symmetry break- ing in 2d fermi systems with a quadratic band crossing, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 046811 (2009)

2009
[70]

D. Xiao, J. Shi, and Q. Niu, Berry phase correction to electron density of states in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137204 (2005)

2005
[71]

D. Xiao, W. Yao, and Q. Niu, Valley-contrasting physics in graphene: Magnetic moment and topological transport, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 236809 (2007)

2007
[72]

Liu, C.-X

Z. Liu, C.-X. Liu, Y .-S. Wu, W.-H. Duan, F. Liu, and J. Wu, Stable NontrivialZ 2 Topology in Ultrathin Bi (111) Films: A First-Principles Study, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 136805 (2011)

2011
[73]

I. K. Drozdov, A. Alexandradinata, S. Jeon, S. Nadj-Perge, H. Ji, R. J. Cava, B. Andrei Bernevig, and A. Yazdani, One- dimensional topological edge states of bismuth bilayers, Nature Physics10, 664 (2014)

2014
[74]

D. Xiao, W. Zhu, Y . Ran, N. Nagaosa, and S. Okamoto, In- terface engineering of quantum hall effects in digital transition metal oxide heterostructures, Nature Communications2, 596 (2011)

2011
[75]

R ¨uegg and G

A. R ¨uegg and G. A. Fiete, Topological insulators from complex orbital order in transition-metal oxides heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B84, 201103 (2011)

2011
[76]

Y . Wang, H. Steinberg, P. Jarillo-Herrero, and N. Gedik, Obser- vation of Floquet-Bloch states on the surface of a topological insulator, Science342, 453 (2013)

2013
[77]

S. Zhou, C. Bao, B. Fan, H. Zhou, Q. Gao, H. Zhong, T. Lin, H. Liu, P. Yu, P. Tang, S. Meng, W. Duan, and S. Zhou, Pseudospin-selective Floquet band engineering in black phos- phorus, Nature614, 75 (2023)

2023
[78]

S. Zhou, C. Bao, B. Fan, F. Wang, H. Zhong, H. Zhang, P. Tang, W. Duan, and S. Zhou, Floquet Engineering of Black Phospho- rus upon Below-Gap Pumping, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 116401 (2023)

2023
[79]

Merboldt, M

M. Merboldt, M. Sch¨uler, D. Schmitt, J. P. Bange, W. Bennecke, K. Gadge, K. Pierz, H. W. Schumacher, D. Momeni, D. Steil, S. R. Manmana, M. A. Sentef, M. Reutzel, and S. Mathias, Observation of Floquet states in graphene, Nature Physics21, 1093–1099 (2025)

2025
[80]

D. Choi, M. Mogi, U. De Giovannini, D. Azoury, B. Lv, Y . Su, H. H ¨ubener, A. Rubio, and N. Gedik, Observation of Floquet–Bloch states in monolayer graphene, Nature Physics 21, 1100–1105 (2025)

2025

Showing first 80 references.