arxiv: 2605.05334 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-th · hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Carroll fermions from null reduction: A case of good and bad fermions

Sucheta Majumdar , Aditya Sharma , Sourav Singha

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th hep-ph

keywords Carroll fermionsnull reductionBargmann spacetimegood and bad fermionslight-cone decompositionDirac actionelectric and magnetic Carroll sectors

0 comments

The pith

A single Bargmann-invariant Dirac action yields both electric and magnetic Carroll fermion actions through null reduction.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives Carrollian fermionic theories by performing a null reduction on a Dirac action defined in Bargmann spacetime. In the light-cone frame the spinor splits into good fermions, which remain dynamical, and bad fermions, which start as constraints; the magnetic Carroll sector comes from the good modes while the electric sector comes from promoting the bad modes once the Bargmann deformation removes their constraints. This light-cone split works in any number of dimensions, unlike the usual chiral decomposition. The resulting actions are shown to be invariant under Carroll transformations, their canonical structures are worked out, and their two-point functions are computed explicitly. A reader cares because the construction supplies a common parent for two previously separate Carroll limits and places their quantization on the same footing.

Core claim

In the Lorentzian light-cone formulation the Dirac spinor decomposes into dynamical good fermions and constrained bad fermions; upon null reduction from Bargmann spacetime the good modes generate the magnetic Carroll fermion action while the bad modes, freed by the deformation, generate the electric Carroll fermion action. Both actions descend from the same Bargmann-invariant Dirac action. The Clifford algebra on the Carroll manifold is obtained by embedding in the ambient Bargmann manifold. The theories are canonically analyzed, shown to be invariant under Carroll transformations, and their two-point functions are calculated, reproducing the expected Carrollian behavior in each sector.

What carries the argument

The light-cone decomposition of the Dirac spinor into good (dynamical) and bad (constrained) components, which carries over under null reduction from the Bargmann parent theory.

If this is right

The magnetic Carroll fermion action is controlled by the good modes of the parent Dirac theory.
The electric Carroll fermion action is controlled by the bad modes once they are promoted to dynamical status by the Bargmann deformation.
Both resulting theories inherit Carroll invariance and admit well-defined two-point functions.
The construction holds uniformly in even and odd spacetime dimensions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same null-reduction route could be applied to other spinor representations or to interacting theories to generate their Carrollian versions from a common relativistic parent.
Quantization of the electric and magnetic sectors can now be compared directly because they descend from the same Bargmann action.
The method suggests that other constrained systems in Lorentzian theories may yield distinct Carroll limits when lifted to Bargmann geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The light-cone split of the Dirac spinor into good and bad fermions, already known to be valid in any dimension, behaves under null reduction exactly as the corresponding split does for bosonic fields.

What would settle it

An explicit check in a low-dimensional example (for instance 2+1 dimensions) showing that the two-point function obtained after null reduction fails to reproduce the known Carroll-fermion propagator in either the electric or magnetic sector.

read the original abstract

We derive Carrollian fermionic actions using the null reduction method from Bargmann spacetimes. In the Lorentzian light-cone formulation, the Dirac spinor naturally decomposes into dynamical and constrained degrees of freedom $-$ the so-called `good' and `bad' fermions $\Psi_{(\pm)}$. These light-cone projections are intrinsically adapted to the null frame and, unlike the chiral decomposition into left- and right-handed spinors $\Psi_{L(R)}$, are valid in arbitrary spacetime dimensions, both even and odd. As in the case of bosons, the magnetic Carroll sector for fermions is governed by the dynamical modes of the parent theory, while the electric sector arises from the constrained modes. Upon deforming to a Bargmann spacetime, these constraints are removed, promoting the `bad' fermions to dynamical modes that describe the electric Carroll fermions. We construct the Clifford algebra on the Carroll manifold through its embedding in the ambient Bargmann manifold, and obtain both electric and magnetic Carroll fermion actions from a \textit{single} Bargmann-invariant Dirac action. We analyze the canonical structure of both theories, establish their invariance under Carroll transformations, and compute the corresponding two-point functions, which exhibit the expected behavior in both sectors. We conclude with some comments on the quantization of these Carrollian theories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a direct null-reduction derivation of both electric and magnetic Carroll fermion actions from one Bargmann Dirac theory using the good/bad light-cone split.

read the letter

The main point is that the authors take the null reduction already used for bosons and apply it to fermions. They split the Dirac spinor into good and bad components in light-cone coordinates on the Bargmann manifold, then deform to remove the constraint on the bad part. This produces the magnetic Carroll action from the dynamical good fermions and the electric one from the promoted bad fermions, all from the same parent Lagrangian. They also build the Carroll Clifford algebra via the embedding and check invariance plus two-point functions in both sectors.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives both electric and magnetic Carroll fermion actions from a single Bargmann-invariant Dirac action via null reduction. It decomposes the Dirac spinor into light-cone 'good' and 'bad' fermions (valid in any dimension, unlike chiral projections), assigns magnetic dynamics to the good modes and electric dynamics to the bad modes after Bargmann deformation removes the constraint, constructs the Carroll Clifford algebra from the ambient manifold, analyzes the canonical structure, proves Carroll invariance, and computes the two-point functions for both sectors.

Significance. If the central construction is correct, the work supplies a parameter-free, unified parent-theory derivation of Carroll fermions in arbitrary (even and odd) dimensions, together with explicit actions, canonical analysis, invariance proofs, and correlators. This extends bosonic null-reduction techniques to fermions and provides concrete, falsifiable expressions that can be checked against other Carrollian limits.

major comments (1)

[light-cone decomposition and null reduction procedure] The light-cone decomposition into good/bad fermions and the subsequent promotion of the bad component to electric Carroll dynamics is stated to hold in arbitrary dimensions (including odd d). However, the transverse Clifford algebra changes character when the spatial dimension is odd; an explicit check of the projector identities, the form of the constraint equation after null reduction, and the resulting electric action in, e.g., 3+1 or 5+1 dimensions is required to confirm that no extra signs or representation obstructions appear. This step is load-bearing for the claim that both sectors emerge from the same parent Lagrangian.

minor comments (2)

[Clifford algebra construction] The abstract and introduction refer to 'the Carroll manifold' without a dedicated subsection defining the induced metric, frame, and Clifford algebra explicitly before the action is written down.
[two-point functions] The two-point functions are stated to 'exhibit the expected behavior'; a short table or explicit expressions comparing them to the bosonic Carroll correlators would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for the positive assessment of the unified null-reduction construction. We address the single major comment below and have incorporated the requested verification into the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The light-cone decomposition into good/bad fermions and the subsequent promotion of the bad component to electric Carroll dynamics is stated to hold in arbitrary dimensions (including odd d). However, the transverse Clifford algebra changes character when the spatial dimension is odd; an explicit check of the projector identities, the form of the constraint equation after null reduction, and the resulting electric action in, e.g., 3+1 or 5+1 dimensions is required to confirm that no extra signs or representation obstructions appear. This step is load-bearing for the claim that both sectors emerge from the same parent Lagrangian.

Authors: We agree that an explicit check in odd dimensions is a useful addition to confirm the absence of sign or representation issues. Our general light-cone decomposition is defined via the null vector in the ambient Bargmann manifold and does not rely on the parity of the transverse dimension; the Clifford algebra is induced from the higher-dimensional embedding, which remains consistent. Nevertheless, to address the referee's concern directly, we have added a new appendix (Appendix C) that performs the full calculation in 3+1 dimensions. There we (i) construct the explicit good/bad projectors using the null frame, (ii) derive the constraint equation after null reduction, and (iii) obtain the electric Carroll action. The transverse gamma matrices in this odd-dimensional case satisfy the required anticommutators without introducing extraneous signs, and the resulting electric action matches the general form given in the main text. This explicit verification confirms that both the magnetic (good) and electric (bad) sectors emerge from the single Bargmann-invariant parent Lagrangian in odd dimensions as well. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct derivation from Bargmann Dirac action via null reduction

full rationale

The paper starts from a single Bargmann-invariant Dirac action in the ambient spacetime, performs a light-cone decomposition of the spinor into good/bad components (explicitly stated as valid in arbitrary dimensions, unlike chiral projections), applies null reduction to obtain the magnetic Carroll sector from dynamical modes, then deforms the Bargmann structure to lift the constraint on bad modes and obtain the electric sector. The Clifford algebra is built by embedding into the parent manifold. No parameters are fitted to data and then relabeled as predictions, no self-definitional loops (e.g., X defined via Y and Y recovered from X), and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. The construction is self-contained against the external Bargmann parent theory and does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. Minor self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction rests on standard assumptions of the Carroll/Bargmann literature without new free parameters or invented entities; the key premises are the validity of null reduction for spinors and the light-cone decomposition in any dimension.

axioms (2)

domain assumption The Dirac spinor admits a light-cone decomposition into good and bad fermions that is valid in arbitrary spacetime dimensions.
Invoked in the abstract as the natural decomposition adapted to the null frame.
domain assumption Null reduction of a Bargmann-invariant Dirac action yields consistent Carrollian fermionic theories.
Core method assumed to extend from bosons to fermions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5532 in / 1285 out tokens · 49391 ms · 2026-05-08T16:47:41.978375+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

Dynamics of Carroll Strings,

B. Cardona, J. Gomis and J. M. Pons,Dynamics of Carroll Strings,JHEP07(2016) 050, [1605.05483]

work page arXiv 2016
[2]

Bagchi, R

A. Bagchi, R. Basu, A. Mehra and P. Nandi,Field Theories on Null Manifolds,JHEP02 (2020) 141, [1912.09388]

work page arXiv 2020
[3]

Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,

L. Donnay and C. Marteau,Carrollian Physics at the Black Hole Horizon,Class. Quant. Grav.36(2019) 165002, [1903.09654]

work page arXiv 2019
[4]

Banerjee, R

K. Banerjee, R. Basu, A. Mehra, A. Mohan and A. Sharma,Interacting Conformal Carrollian Theories: Cues from Electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 105001, [2008.02829]

work page arXiv 2021
[5]

Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories,

M. Henneaux and P. Salgado-Rebolledo,Carroll contractions of Lorentz-invariant theories, JHEP11(2021) 180, [2109.06708]

work page arXiv 2021
[6]

P´ erez,Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity,JHEP12(2021) 173, [2110.15834]

A. Pérez,Asymptotic symmetries in Carrollian theories of gravity,JHEP12(2021) 173, [2110.15834]

work page arXiv 2021
[7]

Baiguera, G

S. Baiguera, G. Oling, W. Sybesma and B. T. Søgaard,Conformal Carroll scalars with boosts,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 086, [2207.03468]

work page arXiv 2023
[8]

Mehra and A

A. Mehra and A. Sharma,Toward Carrollian quantization: Renormalization of Carrollian electrodynamics,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 046019, [2302.13257]

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

Sharma,Studies on Carrollian quantum field theories,Class

A. Sharma,Studies on Carrollian quantum field theories,Class. Quant. Grav.43(2026) 045006, [2502.00487]

work page arXiv 2026
[10]

J. R. Klauder,Ultralocal quantum field theory,Acta Phys. Austriaca Suppl.8(1971) 227–276

1971
[11]

J. R. Klauder,Beyond conventional quantization. Cambridge University Press, 12, 2005

2005
[12]

N. D. Sen Gupta,On an analogue of the Galilei group,Nuovo Cim. A44(1966) 512–517

1966
[13]

Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,Ann

J.-M. Lévy-Leblond,Une nouvelle limite non-relativiste du groupe de Poincaré,Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A3(1965) 1–12

1965
[14]

Bacry and J

H. Bacry and J. Levy-Leblond,Possible kinematics,J. Math. Phys.9(1968) 1605–1614

1968
[15]

B. Chen, R. Liu and Y.-f. Zheng,On higher-dimensional Carrollian and Galilean conformal field theories,SciPost Phys.14(2023) 088, [2112.10514]

work page arXiv 2023
[16]

Bagchi, S

A. Bagchi, S. Banerjee, R. Basu and S. Dutta,Scattering Amplitudes: Celestial and Carrollian,Phys. Rev. Lett.128(2022) 241601, [2202.08438]

work page arXiv 2022
[17]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Bridging Carrollian and celestial holography,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 126027, [2212.12553]

work page arXiv 2023
[18]

L. F. Alday, M. Nocchi, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes from holographic correlators,JHEP03(2025) 158, [2406.19343]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Mason, R

L. Mason, R. Ruzziconi and A. Yelleshpur Srikant,Carrollian amplitudes and celestial symmetries,JHEP05(2024) 012, [2312.10138]

work page arXiv 2024
[20]

Donnay, A

L. Donnay, A. Fiorucci, Y. Herfray and R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian Perspective on Celestial Holography,Phys. Rev. Lett.129(2022) 071602, [2202.04702]

work page arXiv 2022
[21]

Hartong, E

J. Hartong, E. Have, V. Nenmeli and G. Oling,Boundary Energy-Momentum Tensors for Asymptotically Flat Spacetimes, [2505.05432]. – 21 –

work page arXiv
[22]

Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry

C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons and P. A. Horvathy,Conformal Carroll groups and BMS symmetry,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 092001, [1402.5894]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[23]

Carroll symmetry of plane gravitational waves

C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, P. A. Horvathy and P. M. Zhang,Carroll symmetry of plane gravitational waves,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 175003, [1702.08284]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[24]

Flat holography and Carrollian fluids

L. Ciambelli, C. Marteau, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos and K. Siampos,Flat holography and Carrollian fluids,JHEP07(2018) 165, [1802.06809]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[25]

Carrollian hydrodynamics from symmetries,

L. Freidel and P. Jai-akson,Carrollian hydrodynamics from symmetries,Class. Quant. Grav. 40(2023) 055009, [2209.03328]

work page arXiv 2023
[26]

F. Gray, D. Kubiznak, T. R. Perche and J. Redondo-Yuste,Carrollian motion in magnetized black hole horizons,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 064009, [2211.13695]

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

Hall effects in Carroll dynamics,

L. Marsot, P. M. Zhang, M. Chernodub and P. A. Horvathy,Hall effects in Carroll dynamics,Phys. Rept.1028(2023) 1–60, [2212.02360]

work page arXiv 2023
[28]

Fracton Infrared Triangle,

A. Pérez, S. Prohazka and A. Seraj,Fracton Infrared Triangle,Phys. Rev. Lett.133(2024) 021603, [2310.16683]

work page arXiv 2024
[29]

Athanasiou, P

N. Athanasiou, P. M. Petropoulos, S. M. Schulz and G. Taujanskas,One-dimensional Carrollian fluids. Part I. Carroll-Galilei duality,JHEP11(2024) 012, [2407.05962]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

K. S. Kolekar, T. Mandal, A. Shukla and P. Soni,Hydrodynamics in the Carrollian Regime, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A41(2026) 2650016, [2409.18763]

work page arXiv 2026
[31]

Figueroa-O’Farrill, E

J. Figueroa-O’Farrill, E. Have and N. A. Obers,Quantum carrollian bosonic strings, [2509.04397]

work page arXiv
[32]

Bergshoeff, J

E. Bergshoeff, J. Figueroa-O’Farrill and J. Gomis,A non-lorentzian primer,SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes69(2023) 1, [2206.12177]

work page arXiv 2023
[33]

The Carrollian Kaleidoscope

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, P. Dhivakar, S. Mondal and A. Shukla,The Carrollian kaleidoscope, Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 429, [2506.16164]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[34]

Ciambelli and P

L. Ciambelli and P. Jai-akson,Foundations of Carrollian Geometry, [2510.21651]

work page arXiv
[35]

Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography,2511.10162

K. Nguyen,Lectures on Carrollian Holography, [2511.10162]

work page arXiv
[36]

Ruzziconi,Carrollian Physics and Holography,arXiv:2602.02644 [hep-th]

R. Ruzziconi,Carrollian physics and holography,Phys. Rept.1182(2026) 1–87, [2602.02644]

work page arXiv 2026
[37]

E. Ekiz, E. O. Kahya and U. Zorba,Quantization of Carrollian fermions,Phys. Rev. D111 (2025) 105019, [2502.05645]

work page arXiv 2025
[38]

Banerjee, R

K. Banerjee, R. Basu, B. Krishnan, S. Maulik, A. Mehra and A. Ray,One-loop quantum effects in Carroll scalars,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 085022, [2307.03901]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Le Bellac and J

M. Le Bellac and J. M. Lévy-Leblond,Galilean electromagnetism,Nuovo Cim. B14(1973) 217–234

1973
[40]

Banerjee and A

K. Banerjee and A. Sharma,Quantization of interacting Galilean field theories,JHEP08 (2022) 066, [2205.01918]

work page arXiv 2022
[41]

E. S. Santos, M. de Montigny, F. C. Khanna and A. E. Santana,Galilean covariant Lagrangian models,J. Phys. A37(2004) 9771–9789

2004
[42]

Sharma,Galilean fermions: Classical and quantum aspects,Phys

A. Sharma,Galilean fermions: Classical and quantum aspects,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 125009, [2301.04538]. – 22 –

work page arXiv 2023
[43]

Banerjee and S

R. Banerjee and S. Bhattacharya,New formulation of Galilean relativistic Maxwell theory, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 105022, [2211.12023]

work page arXiv 2023
[44]

Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time

C. Duval, G. W. Gibbons, P. A. Horvathy and P. M. Zhang,Carroll versus Newton and Galilei: two dual non-Einsteinian concepts of time,Class. Quant. Grav.31(2014) 085016, [1402.0657]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[45]

B. Chen, R. Liu, H. Sun and Y.-f. Zheng,Constructing Carrollian field theories from null reduction,JHEP11(2023) 170, [2301.06011]

work page arXiv 2023
[46]

Majumdar,Carroll theories from Lorentzian light-cone theories,JHEP02(2026) 258, [2507.03081]

S. Majumdar,Carroll theories from Lorentzian light-cone theories,JHEP02(2026) 258, [2507.03081]

work page arXiv 2026
[47]

de Boer, J

J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll stories,JHEP 09(2023) 148, [2307.06827]

work page arXiv 2023
[48]

de Boer, J

J. de Boer, J. Hartong, N. A. Obers, W. Sybesma and S. Vandoren,Carroll Symmetry, Dark Energy and Inflation,Front. in Phys.10(2022) 810405, [2110.02319]

work page arXiv 2022
[49]

E. A. Bergshoeff, J. Gomis and A. Kleinschmidt,Non-Lorentzian theories with and without constraints,JHEP01(2023) 167, [2210.14848]

work page arXiv 2023
[50]

Afshar, X

H. Afshar, X. Bekaert and M. Najafizadeh,Classification of conformal carroll algebras,JHEP 12(2024) 148, [2409.19953]

work page arXiv 2024
[51]

Marotta, A

R. Marotta, A. Shekar and M. Verma,Carrollian Conformal Theories in Momentum Space, [2512.06881]

work page arXiv
[52]

Magic fermions: Carroll and flat bands,

A. Bagchi, A. Banerjee, R. Basu, M. Islam and S. Mondal,Magic fermions: Carroll and flat bands,JHEP03(2023) 227, [2211.11640]

work page arXiv 2023
[53]

Mele,Carrollian fermions coupled to gravity, Master’s thesis, U

L. Mele,Carrollian fermions coupled to gravity, Master’s thesis, U. Mons, 11, 2023

2023
[54]

N. Ara, A. Banerjee, R. Basu and B. Krishnan,Flat bands and compact localised states: A Carrollian roadmap,SciPost Phys.19(2025) 046, [2412.18965]

work page arXiv 2025
[55]

Grumiller, L

D. Grumiller, L. Mele and L. Montecchio,Carroll spinors, [2509.19426]

work page arXiv
[56]

E. A. Bergshoeff, A. Campoleoni, A. Fontanella, L. Mele and J. Rosseel,Carroll fermions, SciPost Phys.16(2024) 153, [2312.00745]

work page arXiv 2024
[57]

J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper,Quantum Electrodynamics in the Infinite Momentum Frame, Phys. Rev. D1(1970) 2901–2913

1970
[58]

J. D. Bjorken, J. B. Kogut and D. E. Soper,Quantum Electrodynamics at Infinite Momentum: Scattering from an External Field,Phys. Rev. D3(1971) 1382

1971
[59]

Chang, R

S.-J. Chang, R. G. Root and T.-M. Yan,Quantum field theories in the infinite momentum frame. 1. Quantization of scalar and Dirac fields,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 1133–1148

1973
[60]

Carroll fermions, expansions and the lightcone

A. Bagchi and S. Mondal,Carroll fermions, expansions and the lightcone, [2604.14301]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[61]

S. J. Brodsky, H.-C. Pauli and S. S. Pinsky,Quantum chromodynamics and other field theories on the light cone,Phys. Rept.301(1998) 299–486, [hep-ph/9705477]

work page Pith review arXiv 1998
[62]

Figueroa-O’Farrill,Lie algebraic Carroll/Galilei duality,J

J. Figueroa-O’Farrill,Lie algebraic Carroll/Galilei duality,J. Math. Phys.64(2023) 013503, [2210.13924]

work page arXiv 2023
[63]

Majumdar, On the Carrollian nature of the light front, Int

S. Majumdar,On the Carrollian nature of the light front,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A39(2024) 2447012, [2406.10353]. – 23 –

work page arXiv 2024
[64]

Super-Carrollian and Super-Galilean Field Theories,

K. Koutrolikos and M. Najafizadeh,Super-Carrollian and Super-Galilean Field Theories, Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 125014, [2309.16786]

work page arXiv 2023
[65]

F. Lenz, M. Thies, K. Yazaki and S. Levit,Hamiltonian formulation of two-dimensional gauge theories on the light cone,Annals Phys.208(1991) 1–89

1991
[66]

Burkardt,Light front quantization,Adv

M. Burkardt,Light front quantization,Adv. Nucl. Phys.23(1996) 1–74, [hep-ph/9505259]

work page arXiv 1996
[67]

B. Chen, H. Sun and Y.-f. Zheng,Quantization of Carrollian conformal scalar theories,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 125010, [2406.17451]

work page arXiv 2024
[68]

Cotler, K

J. Cotler, K. Jensen, S. Prohazka, A. Raz, M. Riegler and J. Salzer,Quantizing Carrollian field theories,JHEP10(2024) 049, [2407.11971]

work page arXiv 2024
[69]

Cotler, P

J. Cotler, P. Dhivakar and K. Jensen,Carrollian holographic duals are non-local, [2512.05072]

work page arXiv
[70]

Carrollian quantum states and flat space holography

S. Fredenhagen, S. Prohazka and R. Tiefenbacher,Carrollian quantum states and flat space holography, [2604.22745]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[71]

Campoleoni and S

A. Campoleoni and S. Pekar,Carrollian and Galilean conformal higher-spin algebras in any dimensions,JHEP02(2022) 150, [2110.07794]

work page arXiv 2022
[72]

Bekaert, A

X. Bekaert, A. Campoleoni and S. Pekar,Holographic Carrollian conformal scalars,JHEP 05(2024) 242, [2404.02533]

work page arXiv 2024
[73]

Holographic realization of higher-spin Carrollian free fields

E. D’Arcy, A. Delfante and S. Fredenhagen,Holographic realization of higher-spin Carrollian free fields, [2604.27068]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[74]

E. A. Bergshoeff and J. Rosseel,Non-Lorentzian Supergravity, [2211.02604]

work page arXiv
[75]

Grumiller, L

D. Grumiller, L. Montecchio and M. S. Nejati,Carroll dilaton supergravity in two dimensions,JHEP12(2024) 005, [2409.17781]

work page arXiv 2024
[76]

A. J. Bruce,The Carrollian Superplane and Supersymmetry, [2603.21677]

work page arXiv
[77]

Carrollian ABJM: Fermions and Supersymmetry

A. Bagchi, A. Lipstein, S. Mondal and A. J. Zhang,Carrollian ABJM: Fermions and Supersymmetry, [2604.22582]. – 24 –

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv