pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05336 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Wormholes and the imaginary distance bound

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qchep-ph
keywords wormholesimaginary couplingsdistance boundanalytic continuationstring theoryweak gravity conjectureAdS gravitycomplex metrics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Wormholes set an upper bound on how far coupling constants can be taken to imaginary values.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that simple wormhole solutions in gravity, featuring massless scalars at imaginary values, impose an imaginary distance bound. This bound caps the analytic continuation of the theory when those scalars are reinterpreted as coupling constants in flat or AdS settings. In concrete string theory examples, other effects such as string corrections or instabilities make the low-energy description invalid at or before this limit. The authors claim that mechanisms enforcing the bound are a general feature of string theories that contain wormholes, and that the bound sometimes matches the weak gravity conjecture or the Kontsevich-Segal-Witten condition on complex metrics.

Core claim

Some of the simplest wormhole solutions involve massless scalar fields that take imaginary values. Massless fields can be interpreted as coupling constants in asymptotically flat or asymptotically AdS gravity theories. Wormhole effects imply an imaginary distance bound, an upper limit for the analytic continuation of the theory to imaginary values of these couplings. In string theory examples, explicit effects render the low-energy theory invalid either before or precisely at this wormhole limit. The existence of such effects enforcing the distance bound is a general feature of string theories containing wormholes. In some cases the bounds coincide with the weak gravity conjecture and with a

What carries the argument

Wormhole solutions with imaginary massless scalar fields, reinterpreted as coupling constants, whose semiclassical effects enforce a cutoff on further imaginary analytic continuation.

If this is right

  • The low-energy effective theory becomes invalid past the imaginary distance bound.
  • Stringy effects or instabilities appear at or before the bound and prevent further continuation.
  • The bound aligns with the weak gravity conjecture in specific cases.
  • Wormhole-induced bounds are a universal feature in any string theory that includes wormholes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The bound may serve as a new consistency requirement for effective field theories coupled to gravity.
  • It suggests wormholes help define the edge of the string landscape by cutting off certain complex deformations.
  • Holographic models could be used to test whether the cutoff survives beyond semiclassical approximations.

Load-bearing premise

The semiclassical wormhole solutions with imaginary scalars remain relevant in the full quantum theory and genuinely enforce a hard cutoff on analytic continuation rather than being artifacts.

What would settle it

A consistent string theory or quantum gravity model in which the low-energy effective description remains valid and stable for imaginary couplings beyond the wormhole-derived bound.

read the original abstract

Some of the simplest wormhole solutions involve massless scalar fields that take imaginary values. Massless fields can be interpreted as coupling constants in asymptotically flat or asymptotically AdS gravity theories. We argue that wormhole effects imply an imaginary distance bound, an upper limit for the analytic continuation of the theory to imaginary values of these couplings. In string theory examples, we find explicit effects that render the low-energy theory invalid either before or precisely at this wormhole limit. We argue that the existence of such effects enforcing the distance bound is a general feature of string theories containing wormholes. In some cases, the bounds we discuss coincide with the weak gravity conjecture, and with the Kontsevich-Segal-Witten condition on complex metrics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper argues that wormhole solutions in gravity theories involving massless scalar fields (interpreted as couplings) that take imaginary values imply an 'imaginary distance bound,' which limits analytic continuation of the theory into the complex coupling plane. In explicit string theory examples, the low-energy EFT is shown to break down at or before this bound. The authors claim this enforcement mechanism is a general feature of string theories containing wormholes and note coincidences with the weak gravity conjecture and the Kontsevich-Segal-Witten condition on complex metrics.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work provides a novel link between semiclassical wormhole effects and bounds on complexified couplings, offering a potential non-perturbative mechanism within the swampland program. The concrete string theory examples add value by making the bound explicit, and the noted overlaps with WGC and KSW conditions suggest broader consistency. Strengths include the focus on massless scalars as couplings and the attempt to connect wormholes to analytic continuation limits.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The core argument that semiclassical wormhole saddles with imaginary scalars enforce a hard cutoff on analytic continuation (as stated in the abstract) rests on an interpretation that these effects remain relevant and impose a genuine bound in the full quantum theory, rather than being artifacts of the semiclassical approximation; without a controlled non-perturbative computation or explicit demonstration of the cutoff mechanism, this assumption is load-bearing and requires further justification.
  2. The generality claim that 'the existence of such effects enforcing the distance bound is a general feature of string theories containing wormholes' is supported only by specific examples; a more systematic argument or classification of wormhole solutions would be needed to establish that the bound is not an artifact of post-hoc example selection.
minor comments (2)
  1. The precise mathematical definition of the 'imaginary distance bound' (e.g., in terms of a metric on coupling space) should be stated explicitly and early, rather than left implicit from the wormhole solutions.
  2. Clarify the regime of validity of the semiclassical wormhole solutions when scalars are continued to imaginary values, including any assumptions about the effective theory cutoff.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We respond point by point to the major comments below, indicating planned revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] The core argument that semiclassical wormhole saddles with imaginary scalars enforce a hard cutoff on analytic continuation (as stated in the abstract) rests on an interpretation that these effects remain relevant and impose a genuine bound in the full quantum theory, rather than being artifacts of the semiclassical approximation; without a controlled non-perturbative computation or explicit demonstration of the cutoff mechanism, this assumption is load-bearing and requires further justification.

    Authors: We agree that the argument is grounded in the semiclassical approximation and that a controlled non-perturbative demonstration of the cutoff is not provided. The manuscript instead relies on explicit string theory examples in which the low-energy EFT is shown to break down at or before the wormhole bound through the appearance of light states or other inconsistencies. We will revise the abstract and relevant sections to clarify that the bound is suggested by semiclassical wormhole effects and is realized via explicit EFT breakdowns in the examples, rather than asserting a non-perturbative hard cutoff. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The generality claim that 'the existence of such effects enforcing the distance bound is a general feature of string theories containing wormholes' is supported only by specific examples; a more systematic argument or classification of wormhole solutions would be needed to establish that the bound is not an artifact of post-hoc example selection.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the generality statement is based on the specific examples analyzed rather than a complete classification of wormhole solutions. A systematic classification lies beyond the scope of the present work. In the revised manuscript we will weaken the claim to state that the bound is enforced in the examples considered and discuss the structural reasons tied to massless scalars in string compactifications, while noting that broader generality remains conjectural and merits further study. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: bound follows from semiclassical wormhole saddles and string examples

full rationale

The derivation starts from known semiclassical wormhole solutions involving massless scalars at imaginary values, interprets these as implying a cutoff on analytic continuation of couplings (the imaginary distance bound), and then checks explicit string theory realizations where the low-energy EFT is invalidated at or before the bound by other effects. This chain does not reduce any prediction to a fitted input or self-definition; the wormhole saddles are standard solutions in the Einstein-scalar theory and their cutoff interpretation is an additional physical claim, not a tautology. String examples supply independent enforcement mechanisms outside the wormhole analysis itself. No load-bearing self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is required for the central argument. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks such as the WGC and KSW conditions, which are only noted as coincidences rather than used as premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The argument relies on the existence and relevance of semiclassical wormhole solutions with imaginary scalars, plus standard assumptions of string theory embeddings. No explicit free parameters are named in the abstract. No new entities are postulated beyond the wormholes themselves.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Semiclassical wormhole solutions with imaginary massless scalars are physically meaningful saddles in the gravitational path integral.
    Invoked to derive the bound from wormhole effects.
  • domain assumption The low-energy effective theory remains valid up to the point where stringy or other effects invalidate it.
    Used to argue that the bound is enforced before or at the wormhole limit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5414 in / 1458 out tokens · 60153 ms · 2026-05-08T16:42:16.405857+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal

    astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    DESI data indicating evolving dark energy may allow string theory to describe observed universes without violating swampland constraints on constant dark energy.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,A semiclassical ramp in SYK and in gravity, 1806.06840

  2. [2]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2022) 205 [1911.11977]

  3. [3]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013 [1911.12333]. – 44 –

  4. [4]

    Coleman,Black holes as red herrings: Topological fluctuations and the loss of quantum coherence,Nucl

    S.R. Coleman,Black holes as red herrings: Topological fluctuations and the loss of quantum coherence,Nucl. Phys. B307(1988) 867

  5. [5]

    Giddings and A

    S.B. Giddings and A. Strominger,Axion Induced Topology Change in Quantum Gravity and String Theory,Nucl. Phys. B306(1988) 890

  6. [6]

    JT gravity as a matrix integral

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker and D. Stanford,JT gravity as a matrix integral,1903.11115

  7. [7]

    Saad, S.H

    P. Saad, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and S. Yao,Wormholes without averaging,JHEP 09(2024) 133 [2103.16754]

  8. [8]

    Arkani-Hamed, J

    N. Arkani-Hamed, J. Orgera and J. Polchinski,Euclidean wormholes in string theory, JHEP12(2007) 018 [0705.2768]

  9. [9]

    Kontsevich and G

    M. Kontsevich and G. Segal,Wick Rotation and the Positivity of Energy in Quantum Field Theory,Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser.72(2021) 673 [2105.10161]

  10. [10]

    Witten,A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,2111.06514

    E. Witten,A Note On Complex Spacetime Metrics,2111.06514

  11. [11]

    The String Landscape, Black Holes and Gravity as the Weakest Force

    N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa,The String landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force,JHEP06(2007) 060 [hep-th/0601001]

  12. [12]

    Witten,Duality and Axion Wormholes,2601.01587

    E. Witten,Duality and Axion Wormholes,2601.01587

  13. [13]

    J. Held, M. Kaplan, D. Marolf and Z. Wang,Axion Wormholes and the AdS/CFT Factorization Problem,2601.02507

  14. [14]

    J. Held, M. Kaplan, D. Marolf and Z. Wang,Lorentzian Path Integrals and Jackiw-Teitelboim wormholes with imaginary scalars,2601.09932

  15. [15]

    Hertog, B

    T. Hertog, B. Truijen and T. Van Riet,Euclidean axion wormholes have multiple negative modes,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 081302 [1811.12690]

  16. [16]

    Loges, G

    G.J. Loges, G. Shiu and N. Sudhir,Complex saddles and Euclidean wormholes in the Lorentzian path integral,JHEP08(2022) 064 [2203.01956]

  17. [17]

    Aguilar-Gutierrez, T

    S.E. Aguilar-Gutierrez, T. Hertog, R. Tielemans, J.P. van der Schaar and T. Van Riet,Axion-de Sitter wormholes,JHEP11(2023) 225 [2306.13951]

  18. [18]

    Ivo and H

    V. Ivo and H. Tang,One-loop aspects of de Sitter axion wormholes,2603.02335

  19. [19]

    To appear

    G. Di Ubaldo, L. Iliesiu, H.W. Lin and C. Yan, “To appear.”

  20. [20]

    Bergshoeff, A

    E. Bergshoeff, A. Collinucci, U. Gran, D. Roest and S. Vandoren,Non-extremal D-instantons,JHEP10(2004) 031 [hep-th/0406038]

  21. [21]

    Bergshoeff, A

    E. Bergshoeff, A. Collinucci, U. Gran, D. Roest and S. Vandoren,Non-extremal instantons and wormholes in string theory,Fortsch. Phys.53(2005) 990 [hep-th/0412183]

  22. [22]

    Bergshoeff, A

    E. Bergshoeff, A. Collinucci, A. Ploegh, S. Vandoren and T. Van Riet,Non-extremal D-instantons and the AdS/CFT correspondence,JHEP01(2006) 061 [hep-th/0510048]

  23. [23]

    Vafa and E

    C. Vafa and E. Witten,A Strong coupling test of S duality,Nucl. Phys. B431 (1994) 3 [hep-th/9408074]. – 45 –

  24. [24]

    Witten,Instability of the Kaluza-Klein Vacuum,Nucl

    E. Witten,Instability of the Kaluza-Klein Vacuum,Nucl. Phys. B195(1982) 481

  25. [25]

    García-García and V

    A.M. García-García and V. Godet,Euclidean wormhole in the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 046014 [2010.11633]

  26. [26]

    Chakravarty, A

    J. Chakravarty, A. Maloney, K. Namjou and S.F. Ross,A new observable for holographic cosmology,JHEP10(2024) 184 [2407.04781]

  27. [27]

    On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

    H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys. B766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

  28. [28]

    Grimm, E

    T.W. Grimm, E. Palti and I. Valenzuela,Infinite Distances in Field Space and Massless Towers of States,JHEP08(2018) 143 [1802.08264]

  29. [29]

    Harlow, B

    D. Harlow, B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Weak gravity conjecture,Rev. Mod. Phys.95(2023) 035003 [2201.08380]

  30. [30]

    Heidenreich, M

    B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius,Sharpening the Weak Gravity Conjecture with Dimensional Reduction,JHEP02(2016) 140 [1509.06374]

  31. [31]

    Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,

    T.G. Mertens and G.J. Turiaci,Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity,Living Rev. Rel.26(2023) 4 [2210.10846]

  32. [32]

    Eternal traversable wormhole

    J. Maldacena and X.-L. Qi,Eternal traversable wormhole,1804.00491

  33. [33]

    Cheung and G.N

    C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen,Naturalness and the Weak Gravity Conjecture,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 051601 [1402.2287]

  34. [34]

    Benetti Genolini, O

    P. Benetti Genolini, O. Janssen and S. Murthy,Allowable complex metrics and the gravitational index of AdS5 black holes,2601.23197

  35. [35]

    Lectures on Supergravity p-branes

    K.S. Stelle,Lectures on supergravity p-branes, inICTP Summer School in High-energy Physics and Cosmology, pp. 287–339, 6, 1996 [hep-th/9701088]

  36. [36]

    Effects of D-instantons

    M.B. Green and M. Gutperle,Effects of D instantons,Nucl. Phys. B498(1997) 195 [hep-th/9701093]

  37. [37]

    Gross and E

    D.J. Gross and E. Witten,Superstring Modifications of Einstein’s Equations,Nucl. Phys. B277(1986) 1

  38. [38]

    Green and J.H

    M.B. Green and J.H. Schwarz,Supersymmetrical Dual String Theory. 3. Loops and Renormalization,Nucl. Phys. B198(1982) 441

  39. [39]

    Eisenstein Series and String Thresholds

    N.A. Obers and B. Pioline,Eisenstein series and string thresholds,Commun. Math. Phys.209(2000) 275 [hep-th/9903113]

  40. [40]

    Dimopoulos, S

    S. Dimopoulos, S. Kachru, J. McGreevy and J.G. Wacker,N-flation,JCAP08 (2008) 003 [hep-th/0507205]

  41. [41]

    Vadacchino, C

    D. Vadacchino, C. Bonanno, C. Bonati and M. Papace,The imaginary-θdependence of the SU(N) spectrum,PoSLA TTICE2024(2025) 399 [2411.14022]

  42. [42]

    Marolf and J

    D. Marolf and J.E. Santos,AdS Euclidean wormholes,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021) 224002 [2101.08875]

  43. [43]

    Maloney, V

    A. Maloney, V. Meruliya and M. Van Raamsdonk,Ordinary wormholes,2503.12227. – 46 –

  44. [44]

    Maldacena and L

    J.M. Maldacena and L. Maoz,Wormholes in AdS,JHEP02(2004) 053 [hep-th/0401024]

  45. [45]

    Witten and S.-T

    E. Witten and S.-T. Yau,Connectedness of the boundary in the AdS / CFT correspondence,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.3(1999) 1635 [hep-th/9910245]

  46. [46]

    Lyth,What would we learn by detecting a gravitational wave signal in the cosmic microwave background anisotropy?,Phys

    D.H. Lyth,What would we learn by detecting a gravitational wave signal in the cosmic microwave background anisotropy?,Phys. Rev. Lett.78(1997) 1861 [hep-ph/9606387]

  47. [47]

    Chang et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: Cosmic Microwave Background Measurements White Paper,2203.07638

    C.L. Chang et al.,Snowmass2021 Cosmic Frontier: Cosmic Microwave Background Measurements White Paper,2203.07638

  48. [48]

    Rudelius,Constraints on Axion Inflation from the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JCAP09(2015) 020 [1503.00795]

    T. Rudelius,Constraints on Axion Inflation from the Weak Gravity Conjecture, JCAP09(2015) 020 [1503.00795]

  49. [49]

    Brown, W

    J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler,Fencing in the Swampland: Quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation,JHEP10(2015) 023 [1503.04783]

  50. [50]

    Montero, A.M

    M. Montero, A.M. Uranga and I. Valenzuela,Transplanckian axions!?,JHEP08 (2015) 032 [1503.03886]. – 47 –