pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05533 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech

Recognition: unknown

Thermodynamics and emergent thermomechanical response of a quantum ring with nonminimal spin--orbit coupling

Jo\~ao A. A. S. Reis , L. Lisboa-Santos , Edilberto O. Silva
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords quantum ringspin-orbit couplingnonminimal couplingsthermodynamicsthermomechanical responsegrand-canonical ensemblede Haas-van Alphen oscillationsfermions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Nonminimal spin-orbit coupling deforms angular-momentum branches in a quantum ring, reorganizing the low-energy spectrum and imprinting on thermodynamic and thermomechanical properties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that the coupling parameter ξ deforms the angular-momentum branches of fermions confined to a quantum ring. This reorganization of the spectrum produces visible effects in the internal energy, entropy, heat capacity, and spin-orbit response functions. Treating the ring circumference as a thermodynamic variable yields a pressure-like quantity and associated coefficients that connect the microscopic spectrum to mechanical responses. In the grand-canonical ensemble, Fermi statistics amplify these effects, generating coupling-dependent instabilities and sign changes similar to mesoscopic oscillations. A phenomenological extension for interactions via free-energy resummation further sharpens the responses and can induce anomalous thermal contraction.

Core claim

Using the exact spectrum, the nonminimal coupling ξ deforms the angular-momentum branches, reorganizing the low-energy spectrum. This leaves signatures in the internal energy, entropy, heat capacity, and spin-orbit response functions. An effective thermomechanical description is developed by treating the ring circumference as a quasi-static thermodynamic variable, leading to a pressure-like quantity and response coefficients linked to the spectrum. In the grand-canonical ensemble, Fermi statistics strongly enhance the response, producing coupling-dependent instabilities and sign changes reminiscent of mesoscopic de Haas-van Alphen oscillations. A phenomenological interacting extension based

What carries the argument

The nonminimal coupling parameter ξ that deforms angular-momentum branches in the exact spectrum, enabling computation of thermodynamic quantities and definition of thermomechanical responses via the ring circumference.

Load-bearing premise

The exact spectrum from the companion work accurately captures the nonminimal couplings, and the exponential resummation validly approximates collective interacting effects.

What would settle it

An observation or calculation that the grand-canonical response functions lack coupling-dependent sign changes or instabilities would falsify the strong enhancement by Fermi statistics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05533 by Edilberto O. Silva, Jo\~ao A. A. S. Reis, L. Lisboa-Santos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Single-particle canonical partition function view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Entropy per quantum ring as a function of tem view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Helmholtz free energy per quantum ring as a function view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Internal energy per quantum ring versus tempera view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows that the magnetization analog is largest at low temperature, where the free energy is dominated by a small number of split levels and is therefore most sensitive to spectral displacements induced by ξ. As the temperature increases, thermal averaging progressively washes out the coupling sensitivity, and the curves ap￾proach a common plateau. The smooth monotonic evo￾lution confirms that the canonical… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Canonical thermal expectation value of the view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Grand-canonical entropy as a function of temperature view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Grand-canonical heat capacity as a function of view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Grand-canonical internal energy as a function of view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Grand-canonical magnetization analog as a function view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Grand-canonical susceptibility analog as a function view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Grand-canonical thermal expectation value of the view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Low-temperature interacting internal energy for rep view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Low-temperature interacting entropy as a function view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Low-temperature interacting heat capacity for rep view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Low-temperature interacting magnetization ana view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Canonical effective pressure view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. Canonical isothermal compressibility view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: FIG. 23. Canonical isobaric expansion coefficient analogue view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: FIG. 25. Canonical isobaric expansion coefficient view at source ↗
Figure 26
Figure 26. Figure 26: FIG. 26. Grand-canonical effective pressure view at source ↗
Figure 27
Figure 27. Figure 27: FIG. 27. Grand-canonical thermal pressure coefficient view at source ↗
Figure 29
Figure 29. Figure 29: FIG. 29. Grand-canonical isothermal compressibility view at source ↗
Figure 30
Figure 30. Figure 30: FIG. 30. Grand-canonical isobaric expansion coefficient view at source ↗
Figure 32
Figure 32. Figure 32: FIG. 32. Grand-canonical isothermal compressibility view at source ↗
Figure 33
Figure 33. Figure 33: FIG. 33. Grand-canonical isobaric expansion coefficient view at source ↗
Figure 35
Figure 35. Figure 35: FIG. 35. Comparison of the isobaric expansion coefficient view at source ↗
Figure 37
Figure 37. Figure 37: FIG. 37. Interacting thermal pressure coefficient view at source ↗
Figure 38
Figure 38. Figure 38: FIG. 38. Interacting isothermal compressibility view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the thermodynamic and emergent thermomechanical properties of fermions confined to a one-dimensional quantum ring with effective spin--orbit interactions induced by nonminimal couplings to antisymmetric tensor fields. Using the exact spectrum obtained in the companion work, we develop canonical and grand-canonical descriptions and show that the coupling parameter~$\xi$ deforms the angular-momentum branches, reorganizing the low-energy spectrum and leaving clear signatures in the internal energy, entropy, heat capacity, and spin--orbit response functions. We also formulate an effective thermomechanical description by treating the ring circumference as a quasi-static thermodynamic variable. This leads to a pressure-like quantity and associated response coefficients, directly linked to the microscopic spectrum. In the grand-canonical ensemble, Fermi statistics strongly enhance the response, producing coupling-dependent instabilities and sign changes reminiscent of mesoscopic de~Haas--van Alphen oscillations. Finally, we introduce a phenomenological interacting extension based on an exponential resummation of the free energy, showing that collective effects can sharpen the thermomechanical response and induce anomalous thermal contraction. Our results connect spectral deformation, finite-size thermodynamics, and emergent mechanical behavior in spin--orbit-active quantum rings.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops canonical and grand-canonical thermodynamics for fermions on a one-dimensional quantum ring with nonminimal spin-orbit coupling, using the exact single-particle spectrum obtained in a companion work. It shows that the coupling parameter ξ deforms angular-momentum branches, producing signatures in internal energy, entropy, heat capacity, and spin-orbit response functions. Treating the ring circumference as a quasi-static variable yields a pressure-like quantity and associated thermomechanical coefficients. In the grand-canonical ensemble, Fermi statistics are claimed to enhance responses and generate coupling-dependent instabilities with sign changes analogous to mesoscopic de Haas-van Alphen oscillations. The paper concludes by introducing a phenomenological interacting extension via exponential resummation of the free energy, which is asserted to sharpen the thermomechanical response and induce anomalous thermal contraction.

Significance. If the companion spectrum is accurate and the resummation faithfully represents physical interactions, the work would connect spectral reorganization to emergent thermomechanical instabilities in finite-size spin-orbit systems, extending mesoscopic thermodynamics. The explicit use of an exact spectrum is a positive feature that grounds the thermodynamic calculations. However, the central headline claims about collective sharpening and anomalous contraction rest on an ad-hoc construction whose validity is not demonstrated, limiting the overall significance.

major comments (3)
  1. [phenomenological interacting extension (final section)] The phenomenological interacting extension (final section, as described in the abstract) is introduced via an exponential resummation of the free energy without derivation from a microscopic Hamiltonian, without error bounds, and without comparison to perturbative or exact small-N treatments. This construction is load-bearing for the claims that collective effects sharpen the thermomechanical response and induce anomalous thermal contraction; if the resummation does not correspond to any physical interaction, those signatures are artifacts.
  2. [thermodynamic descriptions (canonical and grand-canonical sections)] All thermodynamic quantities and response functions (internal energy, entropy, heat capacity, pressure-like coefficient, and instabilities) are computed directly from the spectrum of the companion work. No independent verification, numerical checks, or explicit formulas for the spectrum are supplied in the present manuscript, so the independence and reproducibility of the reported signatures cannot be assessed from this text alone.
  3. [grand-canonical ensemble and thermomechanical response] The grand-canonical instabilities and sign changes (reminiscent of de Haas-van Alphen oscillations) are stated to arise from Fermi statistics and the ξ-deformed spectrum, yet no explicit expression for the pressure-like quantity or the response coefficients is given that would allow a reader to reproduce the sign changes without the companion spectrum.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction refer to 'clear signatures' and 'anomalous thermal contraction' without quantifying the effect sizes or providing a baseline comparison (e.g., ξ=0 case) in the text.
  2. [throughout] Notation for the coupling ξ and the resummation parameter is introduced without a dedicated table or equation summarizing all symbols and their physical dimensions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing the strongest honest defense of the work while acknowledging limitations. Revisions will be made to improve clarity, reproducibility, and caveats as detailed in the responses.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The phenomenological interacting extension (final section, as described in the abstract) is introduced via an exponential resummation of the free energy without derivation from a microscopic Hamiltonian, without error bounds, and without comparison to perturbative or exact small-N treatments. This construction is load-bearing for the claims that collective effects sharpen the thermomechanical response and induce anomalous thermal contraction; if the resummation does not correspond to any physical interaction, those signatures are artifacts.

    Authors: We agree the extension is phenomenological, as explicitly stated in the manuscript, and serves to illustrate possible effects of interactions on thermomechanical responses rather than to model a specific microscopic Hamiltonian. Such resummation techniques are standard in mesoscopic and statistical mechanics literature for capturing collective behavior in finite systems. We will revise the final section to add explicit caveats on its ad-hoc nature, discuss possible microscopic origins (e.g., via effective interactions), include error estimates where feasible for small N, and tone down headline claims to emphasize that sharpening and anomalous contraction are demonstrated within this model. This addresses the concern without altering the core results. revision: partial

  2. Referee: All thermodynamic quantities and response functions (internal energy, entropy, heat capacity, pressure-like coefficient, and instabilities) are computed directly from the spectrum of the companion work. No independent verification, numerical checks, or explicit formulas for the spectrum are supplied in the present manuscript, so the independence and reproducibility of the reported signatures cannot be assessed from this text alone.

    Authors: The manuscript focuses on thermodynamic implications using the exact spectrum from the companion paper, as noted in the abstract and introduction. To enhance self-containment and reproducibility, we will include the explicit single-particle energy eigenvalues (including the ξ-dependent deformation of angular-momentum branches) in a new appendix. We will also add numerical verification for small system sizes (e.g., N=2,4) by direct summation and comparison to limiting cases (ξ=0). revision: yes

  3. Referee: The grand-canonical instabilities and sign changes (reminiscent of de Haas-van Alphen oscillations) are stated to arise from Fermi statistics and the ξ-deformed spectrum, yet no explicit expression for the pressure-like quantity or the response coefficients is given that would allow a reader to reproduce the sign changes without the companion spectrum.

    Authors: The pressure-like quantity is defined as P = -∂F/∂L (where F is the grand potential and L the circumference) and the thermomechanical coefficients follow from its derivatives with respect to temperature and chemical potential. We will add these explicit expressions in the revised manuscript, written as sums over the single-particle states with the ξ-deformed spectrum, enabling direct reproduction of the sign changes and instabilities once the spectrum formula is included. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Phenomenological exponential resummation reduces collective-effects claim to ansatz choice by construction

specific steps
  1. other [Abstract (final sentence) and interacting-extension section]
    "Finally, we introduce a phenomenological interacting extension based on an exponential resummation of the free energy, showing that collective effects can sharpen the thermomechanical response and induce anomalous thermal contraction."

    The sharpening and anomalous contraction are exhibited by adopting the exponential resummation; because the form is introduced without derivation from a specific interaction and is selected to generate the desired sharpening, the 'showing' is equivalent to the ansatz choice rather than an independent derivation or prediction.

full rationale

Standard thermodynamic quantities (internal energy, entropy, heat capacity, response functions) are obtained by applying canonical/grand-canonical formulas to the spectrum supplied by the companion paper; this step is non-circular because it deploys known statistical mechanics on an externally derived input. The headline assertion that collective effects sharpen thermomechanical response and induce anomalous contraction, however, is demonstrated solely by introducing an exponential resummation of the free energy whose functional form is chosen precisely to produce sharpening and sign changes. No microscopic Hamiltonian, error bound, or comparison to controlled approximations is supplied, so the reported emergent behavior reduces directly to the phenomenological ansatz.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the spectrum supplied by the companion paper and on a phenomenological interaction model; no new fundamental constants are fitted but the interaction treatment is introduced ad hoc.

free parameters (1)
  • ξ
    Coupling parameter that deforms angular-momentum branches; its value controls all reported signatures and instabilities.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The exact spectrum of the quantum ring with nonminimal spin-orbit coupling is known from the companion work.
    Serves as the microscopic input for all canonical and grand-canonical calculations.
invented entities (1)
  • Phenomenological interacting extension via exponential resummation of the free energy no independent evidence
    purpose: To incorporate collective effects that sharpen thermomechanical response and induce anomalous thermal contraction.
    Introduced without independent microscopic derivation or falsifiable prediction outside the model itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5521 in / 1513 out tokens · 88441 ms · 2026-05-08T05:14:04.150180+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Imry,Introduction to Mesoscopic Physics, 2nd ed

    Y. Imry,Introduction to Mesoscopic Physics, 2nd ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2002)

    2002

  2. [2]

    S.Viefers, P.Koskinen, P.SinghaDeo,andM.Manninen, Physica E21, 1 (2004)

    2004

  3. [3]

    M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London A392, 45 (1984)

    1984

  4. [4]

    Aharonov and J

    Y. Aharonov and J. Anandan, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 1593 (1987)

    1987

  5. [5]

    Büttiker, Y

    M. Büttiker, Y. Imry, and R. Landauer, Phys. Lett. A 96, 365 (1983)

    1983

  6. [6]

    L. P. Lévy, G. Dolan, J. Dunsmuir, and H. Bouchiat, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2074 (1990)

    2074

  7. [7]

    Chandrasekhar, R

    V. Chandrasekhar, R. A. Webb, M. J. Brady, M. B. Ketchen, W. J. Gallagher, and A. Kleinsasser, Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 3578 (1991)

    1991

  8. [8]

    Cheung, Y

    H.-F. Cheung, Y. Gefen, E. K. Riedel, and W.-H. Shih, Phys. Rev. B37, 6050 (1988)

    1988

  9. [9]

    Frustaglia and K

    D. Frustaglia and K. Richter, Phys. Rev. B69, 235310 (2004)

    2004

  10. [10]

    Splettstoesser, M

    J. Splettstoesser, M. Governale, and U. Zülicke, Phys. Rev. B68, 165341 (2003)

    2003

  11. [11]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 3045 (2010)

    2010

  12. [12]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    2011

  13. [13]

    Y. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys.17, 6039 (1984)

    1984

  14. [14]

    Dresselhaus, Phys

    G. Dresselhaus, Phys. Rev.100, 580 (1955)

    1955

  15. [15]

    Nitta, T

    J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, H. Takayanagi, and T. Ensslin, Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 1335 (1997)

    1997

  16. [16]

    Grundler, Phys

    D. Grundler, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 6074 (2000)

    2000

  17. [17]

    Žutić, J

    I. Žutić, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Rev. Mod. Phys. 76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  18. [18]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, Nat. Mater.14, 871 (2015)

    2015

  19. [19]

    Winkler,Spin–Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems(Springer, Berlin, 2003)

    R. Winkler,Spin–Orbit Coupling Effects in Two- Dimensional Electron and Hole Systems(Springer, Berlin, 2003)

    2003

  20. [20]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    Colladay and V

    D. Colladay and V. A. Kostelecký, Phys. Rev. D58, 116002 (1998)

    1998

  22. [22]

    V. A. Kostelecký and S. Samuel, Phys. Rev. D39, 683 (1989)

    1989

  23. [23]

    V.A.KosteleckýandM.Mewes,Phys.Rev.D66,056005 (2002)

    2002

  24. [24]

    S. M. Carroll, G. B. Field, and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D 41, 1231 (1990)

    1990

  25. [25]

    Mattingly, Living Rev

    D. Mattingly, Living Rev. Relativ.8, 5 (2005)

    2005

  26. [26]

    Bakke, H

    K. Bakke, H. Belich, and E. O. Silva, Ann. Phys. (Berlin) 523, 910 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    Belich, L

    H. Belich, L. P. Colatto, T. Costa-Soares, J. A. Helayël- Neto, and M. T. D. Orlando, Eur. Phys. J. C62, 425 (2009)

    2009

  28. [28]

    Bakke, E

    K. Bakke, E. O. Silva, and H. Belich, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys.39, 055004 (2012)

    2012

  29. [29]

    Belich, T

    H. Belich, T. Costa-Soares, M. M. Santos, and M. T. D. Orlando, Phys. Lett. B641, 265 (2006)

    2006

  30. [30]

    E. O. Silva, J. A. A. S. Reis, and L. Lisboa-Santos, (2026), arXiv:2604.07731, arXiv:2604.07731 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  31. [31]

    J. A. A. S. Reis, L. Lisboa-Santos, F. M. Andrade, F. dos S.Azevedo,andE.O.Silva,TheEuropeanPhysicalJour- nal Plus140, 758 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    F. E. Meijer, A. F. Morpurgo, and T. M. Klapwijk, Phys. Rev. B66, 033107 (2002). 27

    2002

  33. [33]

    B69, 155335 (2004)

    B.Molnár, F.M.Peeters,andP.Vasilopoulos,Phys.Rev. B69, 155335 (2004)

    2004

  34. [34]

    J. S. Sheng and K. Chang, Phys. Rev. B74, 235315 (2006)

    2006

  35. [35]

    Lorke, R

    A. Lorke, R. J. Luyken, A. O. Govorov, J. P. Kotthaus, J. M. Garcia, and P. M. Petroff, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 2223 (2000)

    2000

  36. [36]

    Fuhrer, S

    A. Fuhrer, S. Lüscher, T. Ihn, T. Heinzel, K. Ensslin, W. Wegscheider, and M. Bichler, Nature413, 822 (2001)

    2001

  37. [37]

    T. Koga, J. Nitta, T. Akazaki, and H. Takayanagi, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 046801 (2002)

    2002

  38. [38]

    Bergsten, T

    T. Bergsten, T. Kobayashi, Y. Sekine, and J. Nitta, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 196803 (2006)

    2006

  39. [39]

    König, A

    M. König, A. Tschetschetkin, E. M. Hankiewicz, J. Sinova, V. Hock, V. Daumer, M. Schäfer, C. R. Becker, H. Buhmann, and L. W. Molenkamp, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 076804 (2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    Nagasawa, D

    F. Nagasawa, D. Frustaglia, H. Saarikoski, K. Richter, and J. Nitta, Nat. Commun.4, 2526 (2013)

    2013

  41. [41]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev.115, 485 (1959)

    1959

  42. [42]

    Aharonov and A

    Y. Aharonov and A. Casher, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 319 (1984)

    1984

  43. [43]

    Stern, Phys

    A. Stern, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1022 (1992)

    1992

  44. [44]

    Nitta, F

    J. Nitta, F. E. Meijer, and H. Takayanagi, Appl. Phys. Lett.75, 695 (1999)

    1999

  45. [45]

    Gorini, P

    C. Gorini, P. Schwab, R. Raimondi, and A. L. Shelankov, Phys. Rev. B82, 195316 (2010)

    2010

  46. [46]

    Tan and J

    W.-C. Tan and J. C. Inkson, Phys. Rev. B60, 5626 (1999)

    1999

  47. [47]

    Tan and J

    W.-C. Tan and J. C. Inkson, Semicond. Sci. Technol.11, 1635 (1996)

    1996

  48. [48]

    Bakke and C

    K. Bakke and C. Furtado, J. Math. Phys.53, 023514 (2012)

    2012

  49. [49]

    F. A. de Lira, L. F. C. Pereira, and E. O. Silva, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures158, 115898 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale,Statistical Mechanics, 3rd ed. (Academic Press, Oxford, 2011)

    2011

  51. [51]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, Part 1, 3rd ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1980)

    1980

  52. [52]

    Byers and C

    N. Byers and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett.7, 46 (1961)

    1961

  53. [53]

    Ambegaokar and U

    V. Ambegaokar and U. Eckern, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 381 (1990)

    1990

  54. [54]

    Y.-J. Lin, K. Jiménez-García, and I. B. Spielman, Nature 471, 83 (2011)

    2011

  55. [55]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P. Öhberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011)

    2011

  56. [56]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P. Öhberg, and I. B. Spiel- man, Rep. Prog. Phys.77, 126401 (2014)

    2014

  57. [57]

    Galitski and I

    V. Galitski and I. B. Spielman, Nature494, 49 (2013)

    2013

  58. [58]

    L. D. Landau, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.7, 19 (1937)

    1937

  59. [59]

    L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz,Statistical Physics, Part 1(Pergamon Press, 1980)

    1980

  60. [60]

    Goldenfeld,Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group(Addison-Wesley, 1992)

    N. Goldenfeld,Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group(Addison-Wesley, 1992)

    1992

  61. [61]

    P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky,Principles of Con- densed Matter Physics(Cambridge University Press, 1995)

    1995

  62. [62]

    Kardar,Statistical Physics of Fields(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2007)

    M. Kardar,Statistical Physics of Fields(Cambridge Uni- versity Press, 2007)

    2007

  63. [63]

    J. W. Negele and H. Orland,Quantum Many-Particle Systems(Addison-Wesley, 1988)

    1988