arxiv: 2605.05966 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🧬 q-bio.PE

Recognition: unknown

Towards a unified framework for multiple stable states in ecological systems

Alan Hastings, Denis D. Patterson, Jennifer Paige

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE

keywords multiple stable statespositive feedback loopsecological resiliencetipping pointshysteresisecosystem managementtransient dynamics

0 comments

The pith

Positive feedback loops are required for multiple stable states in ecological systems and provide the basis for a unified mathematical framework.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews empirical observations and theoretical models of multiple stable states, where distinct ecosystem configurations persist under identical conditions. It places stability, tipping points, hysteresis, and transient dynamics inside one dynamical framework and shows that positive feedback loops appear in every classic example. This unification would allow researchers to identify which mechanisms control shifts between states and to design interventions that exploit or break those loops. The synthesis also examines how spatial and temporal scales affect feedback detection and what this means for restoring degraded systems.

Core claim

Multiple stable states emerge when positive feedback loops create thresholds that separate alternative equilibria; well-studied ecosystem models share this structure together with other common dynamical features such as hysteresis and the possibility of long transients, allowing these phenomena to be placed in a single mathematical setting.

What carries the argument

Positive feedback loops that amplify small changes until the system crosses a threshold into a different stable configuration.

If this is right

Management actions that target positive feedbacks can steer systems toward desired states or prevent unwanted transitions.
Restoration success depends on identifying and weakening or strengthening the relevant feedback loops at appropriate spatial and temporal scales.
Transient dynamics must be considered alongside equilibria when predicting how long a system remains near one state before shifting.
Data from new monitoring technologies can be used to detect and quantify feedback strength in real ecosystems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The framework could be extended to couple ecological multistability with climate or socioeconomic feedbacks.
Persistent-transient theory might replace strict equilibrium concepts when forecasting long-term ecosystem behavior under ongoing change.
Testing the necessity of positive feedbacks would require systematic comparison of systems that do and do not exhibit multiple states.

Load-bearing premise

Diverse ecological models and field cases can be placed inside one common mathematical framework without losing essential system-specific mechanisms.

What would settle it

Documentation of multiple stable states in an ecological system whose governing equations contain no positive feedback loops.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05966 by Alan Hastings, Denis D. Patterson, Jennifer Paige.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Illustration of the space-for-time substitution in ecosystems with multiple stable states. view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: A: The potential surface U(x, y) for a bistable system, where stable equilibria correspond to local minima (valleys) and the unstable equilibrium corresponds to a local maximum (ridge) separating the two basins of attraction. The depth and width of each valley reflect the resistance of the corresponding stable state to perturbation. B: One-parameter bifurcation diagram illustrating how bistability arises a… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: A: Loop diagram illustrating the positive feedback loop composed of two negative interactions in the two-species competition model (3). Solid red lines indicate stable branches of equilibrium solutions, solid black lines indicate unstable branches of equilibrium solutions, and the filled blue dots indicate the location of saddle-node bifurcation points at the onset/offset of multistability. The bistable … view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: A: Loop diagram for the forest-savanna model (5) illustrating multiple possible positive feedback loops in red, assuming we are away from the grassland equilibrium (G = 1, T = S = 0); the ±1 value indicates that the sign of the corresponding Jacobian entry can change depending on the equilibrium value. B: Bifurcation diagram for the forest-savanna model (5) varying the rate of savanna tree seed dispersal (… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Multiple stable states - the coexistence of two or more distinct ecological configurations under identical environmental conditions - have attracted sustained interest in ecology, yet the field still lacks a unified framework connecting ecological mechanisms to dynamical models. Here, we review empirical and theoretical approaches to multiple stable states, synthesising perspectives on stability, tipping, hysteresis, and transient dynamics, and contextualise these within a common mathematical framework. Drawing on examples of well-known ecosystem models, we highlight the central and necessary role of positive feedback loops and identify other common, unifying features of ecological systems that exhibit multiple stable states. We further discuss the relationship between stable and transient dynamics, the roles of spatial and temporal scales in feedback identification, and the implications for ecological restoration and management. We conclude with open questions and challenges for the field, including extending multistability theory to persistent-transient frameworks and harnessing emerging data-collection technologies to sharpen empirical inference.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A review that pulls together multistability ideas around positive feedbacks but adds no new math, data, or resolutions.

read the letter

This paper is a review that organizes existing work on multiple stable states in ecology by highlighting positive feedback loops as central and necessary, along with other shared features like hysteresis and scale dependence. It does not derive new results or test fresh predictions. What it does reasonably well is connect stability concepts, tipping, transients, and management implications using familiar examples such as lakes and savannas. The sections on how spatial and temporal scales affect feedback detection and the practical notes on restoration give it some applied value. The open questions at the end are straightforward and point to real gaps, like moving toward persistent-transient frameworks. The main soft spot is that the unification stays at the level of synthesis. Positive feedbacks driving bistability is a standard observation from dynamical systems, so the paper does not resolve contradictions in the literature or show why one framework captures all cases without loss of detail. As a review it also inherits whatever selection biases exist in the cited models, and without new empirical checks or formal comparisons the claim of a common mathematical framing remains descriptive rather than demonstrated. This is for ecologists and managers who want a single entry point into the multistability literature rather than specialists seeking original advances. A reader already familiar with the key papers will find it light, but someone new to the area could use it to see the connections. It deserves peer review because a clear synthesis can still be useful for organizing a fragmented field, even if the core observations are not novel.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews empirical and theoretical approaches to multiple stable states in ecological systems, synthesizes perspectives on stability, tipping, hysteresis, and transient dynamics, and contextualizes these within a common mathematical framework. Drawing on examples of well-known ecosystem models, it highlights the central and necessary role of positive feedback loops along with other unifying features, discusses the relationship between stable and transient dynamics, the roles of spatial and temporal scales in feedback identification, and implications for ecological restoration and management, while concluding with open questions including extensions to persistent-transient frameworks.

Significance. If the synthesis holds without essential loss of system-specific details, the paper offers a valuable integrative reference that connects disparate models through shared dynamical features such as positive feedbacks. This could aid in identifying common mechanisms across ecosystems and inform management applications. Strengths include the explicit synthesis of stability concepts with transient dynamics and the forward-looking discussion of data-collection technologies for empirical inference.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and synthesis sections] The central claim of contextualizing reviewed approaches 'within a common mathematical framework' (abstract) is load-bearing but remains underspecified in the synthesis; without a concrete mathematical structure (e.g., a generalized state-space representation or stability criterion) that demonstrably accommodates the cited models without contradiction or loss of detail, the unification risks being descriptive rather than operational.
[Ecosystem models examples] The assertion that positive feedback loops are 'central and necessary' (abstract) for multiple stable states is standard in dynamical systems but requires explicit verification against the reviewed examples; if any counter-example model in the manuscript exhibits multistability without positive feedback, this would undermine the necessity claim.

minor comments (2)

[Throughout] Clarify notation for feedback loops and stability metrics when transitioning between empirical and theoretical sections to avoid ambiguity for readers.
[Conclusion] The open questions on extending multistability theory could include more specific testable predictions or suggested empirical protocols.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation and constructive comments, which have helped clarify the operational aspects of our synthesis. We respond point by point to the major comments below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and synthesis sections] The central claim of contextualizing reviewed approaches 'within a common mathematical framework' (abstract) is load-bearing but remains underspecified in the synthesis; without a concrete mathematical structure (e.g., a generalized state-space representation or stability criterion) that demonstrably accommodates the cited models without contradiction or loss of detail, the unification risks being descriptive rather than operational.

Authors: We agree that greater specificity strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (Section 3.1) that presents an explicit generalized state-space form dx/dt = f(x, p) + g(x, p), where g encodes positive feedback terms that can produce multiple roots in the equilibrium condition. We map the three primary models (shallow-lake phosphorus recycling, savanna-forest fire-vegetation, and coral-algae grazing) onto this structure, showing the concrete f and g functions and confirming that the original dynamics are recovered without loss of detail. We also state the local stability criterion (sign of the Jacobian eigenvalues at equilibria) and apply it to each example. These additions make the unification operational while preserving system-specific features. revision: yes
Referee: [Ecosystem models examples] The assertion that positive feedback loops are 'central and necessary' (abstract) for multiple stable states is standard in dynamical systems but requires explicit verification against the reviewed examples; if any counter-example model in the manuscript exhibits multistability without positive feedback, this would undermine the necessity claim.

Authors: We have re-examined every model presented. In each case (lake eutrophication via nutrient recycling, savanna-forest via fire-vegetation, coral reefs via grazing-algae, dryland patterns via infiltration, and predator-prey with Holling type III) multistability is generated by at least one positive feedback loop whose removal collapses the system to a single equilibrium. No counter-example appears in the reviewed literature or our synthesis. We have added a verification table (new Table 2) that lists the positive feedback mechanism for each model, its mathematical representation, and the consequence of its removal. This explicit check confirms the necessity claim within the scope of the systems considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review synthesis with no new derivations or load-bearing reductions

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a review that synthesizes existing empirical and theoretical approaches to multiple stable states, contextualizing them within a common mathematical framework without introducing original derivations, equations, or predictions. It draws on well-known ecosystem models and highlights features such as positive feedback loops as standard observations from dynamical systems theory. No steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or self-citation chains; the central claims are descriptive syntheses of prior literature rather than novel results forced by internal inputs. This is the expected non-finding for a review paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, the synthesis rests on the accuracy and representativeness of the cited ecological literature and standard assumptions in dynamical systems modeling rather than new postulates.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5448 in / 1028 out tokens · 52576 ms · 2026-05-08T03:45:00.563561+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

109 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

K. C. Abbott and V. Dakos. Mapping the distinct origins of bimodality in a classic model with alternative stable states.Theoretical Ecology, 14(4):673–684, Dec. 2021

2021
[2]

K. C. Abbott and B. C. Nolting. Alternative (un)stable states in a stochastic predator–prey model.Ecological Complexity, 32:181–195, 2017

2017
[3]

Aguad´ e-Gorgori´ o, J.-F

G. Aguad´ e-Gorgori´ o, J.-F. Arnoldi, M. Barbier, and S. K´ efi. A taxonomy of multiple stable states in complex ecological communities.Ecology Letters, 27(4):e14413, 2024

2024
[4]

J. C. Aleman, A. Fayolle, C. Favier, A. C. Staver, K. G. Dexter, C. M. Ryan, A. F. Azihou, D. Bauman, M. te Beest, E. N. Chidumayo, et al. Floristic evidence for alternative biome states in tropical africa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(45):28183– 28190, 2020

2020
[5]

D. R. Amor, C. Ratzke, and J. Gore. Transient invaders can induce shifts between alternative stable states of microbial communities.Science Advances, 6(8):eaay8676, 2020. 23

2020
[6]

Angeli, J

D. Angeli, J. E. Ferrell Jr, and E. D. Sontag. Detection of multistability, bifurcations, and hysteresis in a large class of biological positive-feedback systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(7):1822–1827, 2004

2004
[7]

M. L. Baskett and A. K. Salomon. Recruitment facilitation can drive alternative states on temperate reefs.Ecology, 91(6):1763–1773, 2010

2010
[8]

B. E. Beisner, D. T. Haydon, and K. Cuddington. Alternative stable states in ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(7):376–382, 2003

2003
[9]

J. C. Blackwood, A. Hastings, and P. J. Mumby. The effect of fishing on hysteresis in caribbean coral reefs.Theoretical Ecology, 5(1):105–114, 2012

2012
[10]

J. L. Blois, J. W. Williams, M. C. Fitzpatrick, S. T. Jackson, and S. Ferrier. Space can substitute for time in predicting climate-change effects on biodiversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(23):9374–9379, June 2013

2013
[11]

Boettiger

C. Boettiger. Ecological management of stochastic systems with long transients.Theoretical Ecology, 14(4):663–671, Dec. 2021

2021
[12]

Boettiger and A

C. Boettiger and A. Hastings. Quantifying limits to detection of early warning for critical transitions.Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9(75):2527–2539, 2012

2012
[13]

Boettiger, N

C. Boettiger, N. Ross, and A. Hastings. Early warning signals: the charted and uncharted territories.Theoretical Ecology, 6(3):255–264, 2013

2013
[14]

J. F. Bruno, H. Sweatman, W. F. Precht, E. R. Selig, and V. G. W. Schutte. Assess- ing evidence of phase shifts from coral to macroalgal dominance on coral reefs.Ecology, 90(6):1478–1484, 2009

2009
[15]

G. Bunin. Ecological communities with lotka-volterra dynamics.Physical Review E, 95(4):042414, 2017

2017
[16]

J. E. Byers, K. Cuddington, C. G. Jones, T. S. Talley, A. Hastings, J. G. Lambrinos, J. A. Crooks, and W. G. Wilson. Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems.Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21(9):493–500, 2006

2006
[17]

M. K. Cameron. Finding the quasipotential for nongradient SDEs.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 241(18):1532–1550, 2012

2012
[18]

S. R. Carpenter.Regime shifts in lake ecosystems: pattern and variation, volume 15. Inter- national Ecology Institute Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany, 2003

2003
[19]

S. R. Carpenter, D. Ludwig, and W. A. Brock. Management of eutrophication for lakes subject to potentially irreversible change.Ecological Applications, 9(3):751–771, 1999

1999
[20]

N. Chen, K. Yu, R. Jia, J. Teng, and C. Zhao. Biocrust as one of multiple stable states in global drylands.Science Advances, 6(39):eaay3763, 2020

2020
[21]

G. Coco, S. F. Thrush, M. O. Green, and J. E. Hewitt. Feedbacks between bivalve density, flow, and suspended sediment concentration on patch stable states.Ecology, 87(11):2862– 2870, 2006. 24

2006
[22]

J. H. Connell and W. P. Sousa. On the evidence needed to judge ecological stability or persistence.The American Naturalist, 121(6):789–824, June 1983

1983
[23]

Courchamp, L

F. Courchamp, L. Berec, and J. Gascoigne.Allee Effects in Ecology and Conservation. Oxford University Press, 02 2008

2008
[24]

Craciun and M

G. Craciun and M. Feinberg. Multiple equilibria in complex chemical reaction networks: I. the injectivity property.SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 65(5):1526–1546, 2005

2005
[25]

Cuddington, W

K. Cuddington, W. G. Wilson, and A. Hastings. Ecosystem engineers: Feedback and popu- lation dynamics.The American Naturalist, 173(4):488–498, 2009

2009
[26]

D. L. DeAngelis, W. M. Post, and C. C. Travis.Positive feedback in natural systems, vol- ume 15. Springer Science & Business Media, 1986

1986
[27]

R. K. Didham, C. H. Watts, and D. A. Norton. Are systems with strong underlying abiotic regimes more likely to exhibit alternative stable states?Oikos, 110(2):409–416, 2005

2005
[28]

Ditlevsen and S

P. Ditlevsen and S. Ditlevsen. Warning of a forthcoming collapse of the atlantic meridional overturning circulation.Nature Communications, 14(1):4254, 2023

2023
[29]

Dubinkina, Y

V. Dubinkina, Y. Fridman, P. P. Pandey, and S. Maslov. Multistability and regime shifts in microbial communities explained by competition for essential nutrients.Elife, 8:e49720, 2019

2019
[30]

Dudgeon, R

S. Dudgeon, R. Aronson, J. Bruno, and W. Precht. Phase shifts and stable states on coral reefs.Marine Ecology Progress Series, 413:201–216, Aug. 2010

2010
[31]

Folke, S

C. Folke, S. Carpenter, B. Walker, M. Scheffer, T. Elmqvist, L. Gunderson, and C. Holling. Regime shifts, resilience and biodiversity in ecosystem management.Annual Review of Ecol- ogy, Evolution, and Systematics, 35:557–581, 12 2004

2004
[32]

P. J. S. Franks. Npz models of plankton dynamics: Their construction, coupling to physics, and application.Journal of Oceanography, 58(2):379–387, Apr. 2002

2002
[33]

M. I. Freidlin and A. D. Wentzell.Random Perturbations of Dynamical Systems. Springer, New York, 1984

1984
[34]

T. Fukami. Historical contingency in community assembly: integrating niches, species pools, and priority effects.Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 46(1):1–23, 2015

2015
[35]

Fukami and M

T. Fukami and M. Nakajima. Community assembly: alternative stable states or alternative transient states?Ecology Letters, 14(10):973–984, 2011

2011
[36]

L. J. Gilarranz, A. Narwani, D. Odermatt, R. Siber, and V. Dakos. Regime shifts, trends, and variability of lake productivity at a global scale.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(35):e2116413119, 2022

2022
[37]

Graham, A

R. Graham, A. Hamm, and T. Tel. Nonequilibrium potentials for dynamic systems with fractal attractors or repellers.Physical Review Letters, 66:3089–3092, 1991

1991
[38]

Graham and T

R. Graham and T. Tel. Existence of a potential for dissipative dynamical systems.Physical Review Letters, 52:9–12, 1984. 25

1984
[39]

Graham and T

R. Graham and T. Tel. Nonequilibrium potentials for coexisting attractors.Physical Review A, 33:1322–1337, 1986

1986
[40]

T. N. Grainger, K. Stark, C. Song, M. A. Barbour, and R. M. Germain. The equilibrium conundrum.Ecology Letters, 28(11):e70232, 2025

2025
[41]

Hastings

A. Hastings. Transients: the key to long-term ecological understanding?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19(1):39–45, 2004

2004
[42]

Hastings

A. Hastings. Timescales and the management of ecological systems.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(51):14568–14573, 2016

2016
[43]

Hastings, K

A. Hastings, K. C. Abbott, K. Cuddington, T. Francis, G. Gellner, Y.-C. Lai, A. Morozov, S. Petrovskii, K. Scranton, and M. L. Zeeman. Transient phenomena in ecology.Science, 361(6406):eaat6412, 2018

2018
[44]

Hastings, S

A. Hastings, S. Petrovskii, V. Lucarini, and A. Morozov. Tipping points in complex ecological systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.20702, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[45]

S. I. Higgins, S. Banerjee, M. Baudena, D. M. Bowman, T. Conradi, P. Couteron, L. M. Kruger, R. B. O’Hara, and G. J. Williamson. Reassessing the alternative ecosystem states proposition in the african savanna-forest domain.New Phytologist, 243(5):1660–1669, 2024

2024
[46]

Hirota, M

M. Hirota, M. Holmgren, E. H. Van Nes, and M. Scheffer. Global resilience of tropical forest and savanna to critical transitions.Science, 334(6053):232–235, 2011

2011
[47]

C. Holling. Resilience and stability of ecological systems.Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1):1–23, 1973

1973
[48]

C. S. Holling. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the european pine sawfly.The Canadian Entomologist, 91(5):293–320, 1959

1959
[49]

B. W. Ibelings, R. Portielje, E. H. Lammens, R. Noordhuis, M. S. van den Berg, W. Joosse, and M. L. Meijer. Resilience of alternative stable states during the recovery of shallow lakes from eutrophication: Lake veluwe as a case study.Ecosystems, 10(1):4–16, 2007

2007
[50]

Jeppesen, M

E. Jeppesen, M. Sondergaard, J. P. Jensen, K. E. Havens, O. Anneville, L. Carvalho, M. F. Coveney, R. Deneke, M. T. Dokulil, B. Foy, et al. Lake responses to reduced nutrient loading–an analysis of contemporary long-term data from 35 case studies.Freshwater Bi- ology, 50(10):1747–1771, 2005

2005
[51]

K´ efi, M

S. K´ efi, M. Holmgren, and M. Scheffer. When can positive interactions cause alternative stable states in ecosystems?Functional Ecology, 30(1):88–97, 2016

2016
[52]

K´ efi, M

S. K´ efi, M. Rietkerk, M. van Baalen, and M. Loreau. Local facilitation, bistability and transitions in arid ecosystems.Theoretical Population Biology, 71(3):367–379, 2007

2007
[53]

Khazaei, R

T. Khazaei, R. L. Williams, S. R. Bogatyrev, J. C. Doyle, C. S. Henry, and R. F. Ismagilov. Metabolic multistability and hysteresis in a model aerobe-anaerobe microbiome community. Science Advances, 6(33):eaba0353, 2020

2020
[54]

Kreyling

J. Kreyling. Space-for-time substitution misleads projections of plant community and stand- structure development after disturbance in a slow-growing environment.Journal of Ecology, 113(1):68–80, Jan. 2025. 26

2025
[55]

M. A. Leibold, M. Holyoak, N. Mouquet, P. Amarasekare, J. M. Chase, M. F. Hoopes, R. D. Holt, J. B. Shurin, R. Law, D. Tilman, M. Loreau, and A. Gonzalez. The metacommunity concept: a framework for multi-scale community ecology.Ecology Letters, 7(7):601–613, 2004

2004
[56]

T. M. Lenton, H. Held, E. Kriegler, J. W. Hall, W. Lucht, S. Rahmstorf, and H. J. Schellnhu- ber. Tipping elements in the earth’s climate system.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6):1786–1793, 2008

2008
[57]

S. A. Levin. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: the robert h. macarthur award lecture.Ecology, 73(6):1943–1967, 1992

1943
[58]

R. Levins. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control.Bulletin of the Entomological Society of America, 15(3):237–240, 09 1969

1969
[59]

R. Levins. The qualitative analysis of partially specified systems.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 231(1):123–138, 1974

1974
[60]

R. C. Lewontin. The meaning of stability. InBrookhaven Symp Biol, volume 22, pages 13–24, 1969

1969
[61]

S. D. Ling, R. E. Scheibling, A. Rassweiler, C. R. Johnson, N. Shears, S. D. Connell, A. K. Salomon, K. M. Norderhaug, A. P´ erez-Matus, J. C. Hern´ andez, S. Clemente, L. K. Blamey, B. Hereu, E. Ballesteros, E. Sala, J. Garrabou, E. Cebrian, M. Zabala, D. Fujita, and L. E. Johnson. Global regime shift dynamics of catastrophic sea urchin overgrazing.Philo...

2015
[62]

Ludwig, D

D. Ludwig, D. D. Jones, and C. S. Holling. Qualitative analysis of insect outbreak systems: the spruce budworm and forest.Journal of Animal Ecology, 47(1):315–332, 1978

1978
[63]

S. L. Maes, M. P. Perring, R. Cohen, F. Akinnifesi, A. Bargu´ es-Tobella, J.-F. Bastin, M. Bauters, P. N. Bernardino, P. H. Brancalion, J. M. Bullock, et al. Explore before you restore: Incorporating complex systems thinking in ecosystem restoration.Journal of Applied Ecology, 61(5):922–939, 2024

2024
[64]

Manfreda, M

S. Manfreda, M. F. McCabe, P. E. Miller, R. Lucas, V. Pajuelo Madrigal, G. Mallinis, E. Ben Dor, D. Helman, L. Estes, G. Ciraolo, et al. On the use of unmanned aerial systems for environmental monitoring.Remote sensing, 10(4):641, 2018

2018
[65]

D. C. Marvin, L. P. Koh, A. J. Lynam, S. Wich, A. B. Davies, R. Krishnamurthy, E. Stokes, R. Starkey, and G. P. Asner. Integrating technologies for scalable ecology and conservation. Global Ecology and Conservation, 7:262–275, 2016

2016
[66]

R. M. May. Thresholds and breakpoints in ecosystems with a multiplicity of stable states. Nature, 269(5628):471–477, 1977

1977
[67]

Morozov, K

A. Morozov, K. Abbott, K. Cuddington, T. Francis, G. Gellner, A. Hastings, Y.-C. Lai, S. Petrovskii, K. Scranton, and M. L. Zeeman. Long transients in ecology: theory and applications.Physics of Life Reviews, 32:1–40, 2020

2020
[68]

Morozov, U

A. Morozov, U. Feudel, A. Hastings, K. C. Abbott, K. Cuddington, C. M. Heggerud, and S. Petrovskii. Long-living transients in ecological models: Recent progress, new challenges, and open questions.Physics of Life Reviews, 51:423–441, 2024. 27

2024
[69]

P. J. Mumby, A. Hastings, and H. J. Edwards. Thresholds and the resilience of caribbean coral reefs.Nature, 450(7166):98–101, 2007

2007
[70]

P. J. Mumby, R. S. Steneck, and A. Hastings. Evidence for and against the existence of alternate attractors on coral reefs.Oikos, 122(4):481–491, 2013

2013
[71]

D. M. Mushet, O. P. McKenna, and K. I. McLean. Alternative stable states in inherently unstable systems.Ecology and Evolution, 10(2):843–850, Jan. 2020

2020
[72]

B. C. Nolting and K. C. Abbott. Balls, cups, and quasi-potentials: quantifying stability in stochastic systems.Ecology, 97(4):850–864, 2016

2016
[73]

J. E. Petersen and A. Hastings. Dimensional approaches to scaling experimental ecosystems: designing mousetraps to catch elephants.The American Naturalist, 157(3):324–333, 2001

2001
[74]

C. H. Peterson. Does a rigorous criterion for environmental identity preclude the existence of multiple stable points?The American Naturalist, 124(1):127–133, 1984

1984
[75]

Petraitis.Multiple stable states in natural ecosystems

P. Petraitis.Multiple stable states in natural ecosystems. OUP Oxford, 2013

2013
[76]

P. S. Petraitis and S. R. Dudgeon. Experimental evidence for the origin of alternative com- munities on rocky intertidal shores.Oikos, 84(2):239–245, 1999

1999
[77]

P. S. Petraitis and S. R. Dudgeon. Variation in recruitment and the establishment of alter- native community states.Ecology, 96(12):3186–3196, 2015

2015
[78]

P. S. Petraitis, E. T. Methratta, E. C. Rhile, N. A. Vidargas, and S. R. Dudgeon. Experimental confirmation of multiple community states in a marine ecosystem.Oecologia, 161(1):139–148, 2009

2009
[79]

Pichon, I

B. Pichon, I. Gounand, S. Donnet, and S. K´ efi. The interplay of facilitation and competition drives the emergence of multistability in dryland plant communities.Ecology, 105(8):e4369, 2024

2024
[80]

Rietkerk, R

M. Rietkerk, R. Bastiaansen, S. Banerjee, J. van de Koppel, M. Baudena, and A. Doel- man. Evasion of tipping in complex systems through spatial pattern formation.Science, 374(6564):eabj0359, 2021

2021

Showing first 80 references.