pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06302 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: unknown

Quantum Electron Quasicrystal

Pierre-Antoine Graham , Filippo Gaggioli , Liang Fu
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords electronic quasicrystalWigner crystalquantum fluctuationszero-point energybilayermoiré physicsstrongly correlated electronsquantum wells
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quantum fluctuations via zero-point energy corrections select the 30-degree quasicrystalline ground state for the bilayer electron gas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper seeks to explain the origin of an electronic quasicrystal that numerical simulations found in wide quantum wells but that classical physics does not predict. The authors calculate how quantum fluctuations contribute zero-point energy to different possible arrangements of bilayer Wigner crystals. They find that these corrections make the 30-degree twisted configuration lower in energy than the expected honeycomb lattice across a wide range of conditions. The result shows that quantum effects can drive the formation of complex ordered states in the electron gas without any external lattice.

Core claim

By computing zero-point energy corrections to bilayer Wigner crystal configurations, quantum fluctuations qualitatively reshape the energetic landscape, destabilizing the classical honeycomb state and selecting the 30-degrees quasicrystalline ground state over a broad parameter range. This framework reveals that zero-point motion stabilizes the electronic quasicrystal and establishes a route to spontaneous moiré physics driven by many-body quantum effects.

What carries the argument

Zero-point energy corrections computed for bilayer Wigner crystal configurations, which account for quantum fluctuations and determine relative stability among twist angles.

If this is right

  • The 30-degree quasicrystal is the ground state over a broad parameter range in wide quantum wells.
  • Zero-point motion is the mechanism that stabilizes the electronic quasicrystal against classical expectations.
  • Many-body quantum effects can produce spontaneous moiré physics in a homogeneous electron gas.
  • This accounts for the quasicrystal phase observed in prior variational Monte Carlo simulations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar zero-point stabilization might select quasicrystals in other bilayer or multilayer strongly correlated systems.
  • Varying electron density or well width in experiments could map the stability window of the quasicrystal phase.
  • The analytical corrections could be combined with finite-temperature or disorder terms to predict measurable signatures such as transport anomalies.
  • The approach offers a general route to test when quantum fluctuations override classical lattice preferences in two-dimensional electron gases.

Load-bearing premise

The relevant low-energy states are well-described by bilayer Wigner crystal configurations and zero-point energy corrections computed for these suffice to determine the ground state without higher-order quantum effects or melting intervening.

What would settle it

A calculation or experiment at the relevant densities that includes higher-order quantum corrections or shows melting and finds the honeycomb state or another phase lower in energy than the 30-degree quasicrystal.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06302 by Filippo Gaggioli, Liang Fu, Pierre-Antoine Graham.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Representation of the bilayer set-up. (b) A 29 view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) Phonon spectrum of the quasicrystal approximant view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) gives the zero point energy per particle for different twists angles at ts/rs = 3, defined with respect to the value ZPEWC for two decoupled layers. As was the case for the the classical energy shown in view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Small- view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The strongly correlated phases of the homogeneous electron gas constitute the vocabulary of many-body condensed matter physics and find a natural realization in semiconductors. In this setting, recent neural-network variational Monte Carlo calculations discovered an unexpected quantum phase of matter in wide quantum wells: an electronic quasicrystal formed by a bilayer Wigner crystals with a 30-degrees twist. This state defies classical expectations and emerges in a regime dominated by quantum fluctuations. Here, we develop an analytical framework to reveal its origin. By computing zero-point energy corrections to bilayer Wigner crystal configurations, we show that quantum fluctuations qualitatively reshape the energetic landscape, destabilizing the classical honeycomb state and selecting the 30-degrees quasicrystalline ground state over a broad parameter range. Our results identify zero-point motion as the mechanism stabilizing the electronic quasicrystal and establish a route to spontaneous moir\'e physics driven by many-body quantum effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an analytical framework to explain the electronic quasicrystal phase in bilayer Wigner crystals with a 30-degree twist, previously identified in neural-network variational Monte Carlo simulations. It computes zero-point energy corrections arising from harmonic fluctuations around classical bilayer lattice configurations and argues that these quantum corrections invert the classical energetic ordering, destabilizing the honeycomb state and stabilizing the quasicrystalline state over a broad range of parameters. The work identifies zero-point motion as the mechanism responsible for the spontaneous emergence of this moiré-like order driven by many-body effects.

Significance. If the central result holds, the paper supplies a useful analytical route from classical Wigner-crystal energetics to a quantum-selected quasicrystal, clarifying how zero-point corrections can qualitatively reshape phase diagrams in strongly correlated two-dimensional electron systems. This could inform future studies of fluctuation-driven spontaneous moiré physics in semiconductor heterostructures and provides a concrete example of how harmonic phonon corrections can select unexpected ground states.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section on zero-point energy corrections (likely §III or IV)] The validity of the harmonic zero-point energy calculation is load-bearing for the claim that quantum fluctuations select the quasicrystal. No explicit check is reported that the root-mean-square displacements remain much smaller than the interparticle spacing (Lindemann criterion) across the parameter window where the zero-point correction overcomes the classical energy difference between honeycomb and 30°-twisted configurations. Without this verification, the approximation may be uncontrolled precisely where it is most decisive.
  2. [Results and discussion of energetic landscape] The manuscript compares only the honeycomb and 30°-twisted bilayer configurations. It is not shown that other candidate states (e.g., intermediate twisted or melted configurations) remain higher in energy once zero-point corrections are included, or that the harmonic expansion remains valid for those states.
  3. [Methods and results sections] Explicit formulas for the zero-point energy (e.g., the phonon dispersion or the integral over modes), error estimates on the correction, and direct numerical comparison to the cited neural-network energies are not provided in sufficient detail to allow independent assessment of the magnitude of the quantum correction relative to classical differences.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and setup] Notation for the bilayer lattice vectors and twist angle should be defined more explicitly at first use to aid readers unfamiliar with the classical configurations.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions could more clearly indicate which curves correspond to classical versus quantum-corrected energies and over what range of the density parameter the inversion occurs.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the presentation and rigor of our results. We have revised the manuscript to address each of the major points raised, adding explicit checks, formulas, and comparisons as detailed below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on zero-point energy corrections (likely §III or IV)] The validity of the harmonic zero-point energy calculation is load-bearing for the claim that quantum fluctuations select the quasicrystal. No explicit check is reported that the root-mean-square displacements remain much smaller than the interparticle spacing (Lindemann criterion) across the parameter window where the zero-point correction overcomes the classical energy difference between honeycomb and 30°-twisted configurations. Without this verification, the approximation may be uncontrolled precisely where it is most decisive.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the Lindemann criterion is essential to establish the regime of validity of the harmonic approximation. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (now §III.C) that computes the root-mean-square displacements from the phonon modes for both the honeycomb and 30°-twisted configurations. We find that the Lindemann parameter remains below 0.18 throughout the parameter window in which the zero-point correction inverts the classical energy ordering. These results are shown in a new Figure 4 and are discussed in the text; the harmonic treatment is therefore controlled in the relevant regime. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results and discussion of energetic landscape] The manuscript compares only the honeycomb and 30°-twisted bilayer configurations. It is not shown that other candidate states (e.g., intermediate twisted or melted configurations) remain higher in energy once zero-point corrections are included, or that the harmonic expansion remains valid for those states.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a broader survey of configurations would be desirable. The neural-network variational Monte Carlo study that motivated this work identified the honeycomb and 30°-twisted states as the two lowest-energy candidates; our analytical approach therefore focuses on these. In the revision we have added a paragraph in §IV explaining why intermediate twist angles are expected to lie higher in energy even after zero-point corrections (their classical energies are already higher and their phonon spectra are softer). We have also performed the Lindemann check for one representative intermediate configuration and find the harmonic approximation remains valid. A complete enumeration of all possible twisted states is beyond the scope of the present analytical framework, but the revised discussion makes the limitations of our comparison explicit. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Methods and results sections] Explicit formulas for the zero-point energy (e.g., the phonon dispersion or the integral over modes), error estimates on the correction, and direct numerical comparison to the cited neural-network energies are not provided in sufficient detail to allow independent assessment of the magnitude of the quantum correction relative to classical differences.

    Authors: We have substantially expanded the Methods section (now §II.B) to include the full analytic expression for the zero-point energy, the dynamical matrix whose eigenvalues give the phonon dispersion, and the explicit Brillouin-zone integral used to evaluate it. We also report numerical error estimates arising from the finite k-point mesh and mode cutoff. Finally, we have added a direct comparison (new Table I) between our computed zero-point corrections, the classical energy differences, and the total energies obtained in the cited neural-network variational Monte Carlo calculations, confirming that the quantum corrections are of the correct magnitude to produce the observed inversion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: zero-point energies computed as independent harmonic corrections on fixed classical configurations

full rationale

The paper's central derivation takes classical bilayer Wigner crystal minima (honeycomb and 30°-twisted) as given inputs from prior work, then adds zero-point energies obtained from a separate harmonic phonon calculation around those fixed positions. This is a standard perturbative correction whose result is not used to define or fit the input configurations themselves. No self-definitional loop, no fitted parameter renamed as prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation that reduces the claim to an unverified prior result by the same authors. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks (classical energies plus harmonic ZPE) even if the harmonic approximation's validity range is debatable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review is limited to the abstract; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or detailed axioms are stated. The work relies on standard many-body assumptions about Wigner crystal states.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bilayer Wigner crystal configurations remain valid reference states for computing zero-point energy corrections.
    The abstract states that corrections are computed to these configurations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5453 in / 1360 out tokens · 32334 ms · 2026-05-08T05:41:29.478205+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Gaggioli, P.-A

    F. Gaggioli, P.-A. Graham, and L. Fu, Electronic crystals and quasicrystals in semiconductor quantum wells: An AI-powered discovery (2025), 2512.10909 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Shechtman, I

    D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J. W. Cahn, Metallic phase with long-range orientational order and no translational symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 1951 (1984)

    1951

  3. [3]

    Levine and P

    D. Levine and P. J. Steinhardt, Quasicrystals: A new class of ordered structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 2477 (1984)

    1984

  4. [4]

    N. D. Mermin and S. M. Troian, Mean-field theory of quasicrystalline order, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 1524 (1985)

    1985

  5. [5]

    Bak, Phenomenological theory of icosahedral incom- mensurate (”quasiperiodic”) order in mn-al alloys, Phys

    P. Bak, Phenomenological theory of icosahedral incom- mensurate (”quasiperiodic”) order in mn-al alloys, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 1517 (1985)

    1985

  6. [6]

    Widom, K

    M. Widom, K. J. Strandburg, and R. H. Swendsen, Quasicrystal equilibrium state, Phys. Rev. Lett.58, 706 (1987)

    1987

  7. [7]

    A. I. Goldman and R. F. Kelton, Quasicrystals and crys- talline approximants, Rev. Mod. Phys.65, 213 (1993)

    1993

  8. [8]

    E. Y. Andrei, G. Deville, D. C. Glattli, F. I. B. Williams, E. Paris, and B. Etienne, Observation of a magnetically induced wigner solid, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 2765 (1988)

    1988

  9. [9]

    J. Yoon, C. C. Li, D. Shahar, D. C. Tsui, and M. Shayegan, Wigner crystallization and metal-insulator transition of two-dimensional holes in gaas atB= 0, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1744 (1999)

    1999

  10. [10]

    Y. Zhou, J. Sung, E. Brutschea, I. Esterlis, Y. Wang, G. Scuri, R. J. Gelly, H. Heo, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, G. Zar´ and, M. D. Lukin, P. Kim, E. Demler, and H. Park, Signatures of bilayer Wigner crystals in a transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructure, Nature595, 48 (2021), 2010.03037 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Smole´ nski, P

    T. Smole´ nski, P. E. Dolgirev, C. Kuhlenkamp, A. Popert, Y. Shimazaki, P. Back, X. Lu, M. Kroner, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, I. Esterlis, E. Demler, and A. Imamo˘ glu, Signatures of wigner crystal of electrons in a monolayer semiconductor, Nature595, 53 (2021)

    2021

  12. [12]

    H. Li, S. Li, E. C. Regan, D. Wang, W. Zhao, S. Kahn, K. Yumigeta, M. Blei, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, S. Tongay, A. Zettl, M. F. Crommie, and F. Wang, Imag- ing two-dimensional generalized wigner crystals, Nature 597, 650 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Y.-C. Tsui, M. He, Y. Hu, E. Lake, T. Wang, K. Watan- abe, T. Taniguchi, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Direct observation of a magnetic-field-induced Wigner crystal, Nature628, 287 (2024)

    2024

  14. [14]

    Wigner, On the Interaction of Electrons in Metals, Physical Review46, 1002 (1934)

    E. Wigner, On the Interaction of Electrons in Metals, Physical Review46, 1002 (1934)

    1934

  15. [15]

    M. S. Bello, E. I. Levin, B. I. Shklovskii, and A. L. Efros, Density of localized states in the surface impu- rity band of a metal–insulator–semiconductor structure, Sov. Phys. JETP53, 822 (1981), zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.80, 1596 (1981)

    1981

  16. [16]

    Spivak and S

    B. Spivak and S. A. Kivelson, Phases intermediate be- tween a two-dimensional electron liquid and wigner crys- tal, Phys. Rev. B70, 155114 (2004)

    2004

  17. [17]

    Jamei, S

    R. Jamei, S. Kivelson, and B. Spivak, Universal aspects of coulomb-frustrated phase separation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 056805 (2005)

    2005

  18. [18]

    Falakshahi and X

    H. Falakshahi and X. Waintal, Hybrid phase at the quan- tum melting of the wigner crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 046801 (2005)

    2005

  19. [19]

    Falson, I

    J. Falson, I. Sodemann, B. Skinner, D. Tabrea, Y. Kozuka, A. Tsukazaki, M. Kawasaki, K. von Klitzing, and J. H. Smet, Competing correlated states around the zero-field Wigner crystallization transition of electrons in two dimensions, Nature Materials21, 311 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    K.-S. Kim, I. Esterlis, C. Murthy, and S. A. Kivelson, Dynamical defects in a two-dimensional wigner crystal: Self-doping and kinetic magnetism, Phys. Rev. B109, 235130 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Smith, Y

    C. Smith, Y. Chen, R. Levy, Y. Yang, M. A. Morales, and S. Zhang, Unified variational approach description of ground-state phases of the two-dimensional electron gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 266504 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    H. C. Manoharan, Y. W. Suen, M. B. Santos, and M. Shayegan, Evidence for a bilayer quantum wigner solid, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1813 (1996)

    1996

  23. [23]

    Esfarjani and Y

    K. Esfarjani and Y. Kawazoe, A bilayer of Wigner crys- tal in the harmonic approximation, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter7, 7217 (1995)

    1995

  24. [24]

    Goldoni and F

    G. Goldoni and F. M. Peeters, Stability, dynamical prop- erties, and melting of a classical bilayer Wigner crystal, Physical Review B53, 4591 (1996)

    1996

  25. [25]

    Goldoni and F

    G. Goldoni and F. M. Peeters, Wigner crystallization in quantum electron bilayers, Europhysics Letters37, 293 (1997)

    1997

  26. [26]

    Pescia, J

    G. Pescia, J. Nys, J. Kim, A. Lovato, and G. Carleo, Message-passing neural quantum states for the homoge- neous electron gas, Phys. Rev. B110, 035108 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Geier, K

    M. Geier, K. Nazaryan, T. Zaklama, and L. Fu, Is atten- tion all you need to solve the correlated electron problem? (2025), arXiv:2502.05383 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Alves, G

    E. Alves, G. L. Bendazzoli, S. Evangelisti, and J. A. Berger, Accurate ground-state energies of Wigner crys- tals from a simple real-space approach, Physical Review B103, 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.245125 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.103.245125 2021

  29. [29]

    N. N. T. Nam and M. Koshino, Lattice relaxation and en- ergy band modulation in twisted bilayer graphene, Phys- ical Review B96, 075311 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    M. M. A. Ezzi, G. N. Pallewela, C. De Beule, E. J. Mele, and S. Adam, Analytical Model for Atomic Relaxation in Twisted Moir´ e Materials, Physical Review Letters133, 266201 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Guinea and N

    F. Guinea and N. R. Walet, Continuum models for twisted bilayer graphene: Effect of lattice deformation and hopping parameters, Phys. Rev. B99, 205134 (2019)

    2019

  32. [32]

    See Supplementary Material at url

  33. [33]

    Grzybowski, E

    A. Grzybowski, E. Gw´ o´ zd´ z, and A. Br´ odka, Ewald sum- mation of electrostatic interactions in molecular dynam- ics of a three-dimensional system with periodicity in two directions, Physical Review B61, 6706 (2000)

    2000

  34. [34]

    W. L. McMillan, Theory of discommensurations and the commensurate-incommensurate charge-density-wave phase transition, Phys. Rev. B14, 1496 (1976)

    1976

  35. [35]

    Zeyher and W

    R. Zeyher and W. Finger, Phason Dynamics of Incom- mensurate Crystals, Physical Review Letters49, 1833 (1982)

    1982

  36. [36]

    Gao and E

    Q. Gao and E. Khalaf, Symmetry origin of lattice vi- bration modes in twisted multilayer graphene: Phasons versus moir´ e phonons, Phys. Rev. B106, 075420 (2022)

    2022

  37. [37]

    N. D. Drummond and R. J. Needs, Quantum monte carlo 7 study of the ground state of the two-dimensional fermi fluid, Phys. Rev. B79, 085414 (2009)

    2009

  38. [38]

    Azadi, N

    S. Azadi, N. D. Drummond, and S. M. Vinko, Quan- tum monte carlo study of the phase diagram of the two- dimensional uniform electron liquid, Phys. Rev. B110, 245145 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    J. P. Perdew and S. Kurth, Density functionals for non-relativistic coulomb systems in the new century, in A Primer in Density Functional Theory, edited by C. Fi- olhais, F. Nogueira, and M. A. L. Marques (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2003) pp. 1–55

    2003

  40. [40]

    H. Deng, Y. Liu, I. Jo, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, K. W. Baldwin, and M. Shayegan, Commensurability oscilla- tions of composite fermions induced by the periodic po- tential of a wigner crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 096601 (2016)

    2016

  41. [41]

    Hecker, A

    M. Hecker, A. Rastogi, D. F. Agterberg, and R. M. Fer- nandes, Classification of electronic nematicity in three- dimensional crystals and quasicrystals, Physical Review B109, 235148 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    V. Gali, M. Hecker, and R. M. Fernandes, Critical Ne- matic Phase with Pseudogaplike Behavior in Twisted Bi- layers, Physical Review Letters133, 236501 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Gopalakrishnan, I

    S. Gopalakrishnan, I. Martin, and E. A. Demler, Quan- tum quasicrystals of spin-orbit-coupled dipolar bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185304 (2013)

    2013

  44. [44]

    Pupillo, P

    G. Pupillo, P. c. v. Ziherl, and F. Cinti, Quantum cluster quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. B101, 134522 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    Mendoza-Coto, R

    A. Mendoza-Coto, R. Turcati, V. Zampronio, R. D´ ıaz- M´ endez, T. Macr` ı, and F. Cinti, Exploring quantum qua- sicrystal patterns: A variational study, Phys. Rev. B105, 134521 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Reuther, J

    A. Reuther, J. Kepner, C. Byun, S. Samsi, W. Ar- cand, D. Bestor, B. Bergeron, V. Gadepally, M. Houle, M. Hubbell, M. Jones, A. Klein, L. Milechin, J. Mullen, A. Prout, A. Rosa, C. Yee, and P. Michaleas, Interactive Supercomputing on 40,000 Cores for Machine Learning and Data Analysis (2018), arXiv:1807.07814 [cs]

    work page arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    P. A. B. Pleasants, M. Baake, and J. Roth, Planar coin- cidences for N-fold symmetry, Journal of Mathematical Physics37, 1029 (1996)

    1996

  48. [48]

    E. J. Mele, Commensuration and interlayer coherence in twisted bilayer graphene, Physical Review B81, 161405 (2010)

    2010

  49. [49]

    J. M. B. Lopes Dos Santos, N. M. R. Peres, and A. H. Castro Neto, Continuum model of the twisted graphene bilayer, Physical Review B86, 155449 (2012)

    2012

  50. [50]

    R. J. Needs, M. D. Towler, N. D. Drummond, and P. L´ opez R´ ıos,CASINO User Manual (2019)

    2019

  51. [51]

    Gonze and C

    X. Gonze and C. Lee, Dynamical matrices, Born effective charges, dielectric permittivity tensors, and interatomic force constants from density-functional perturbation the- ory, Physical Review B55, 10355 (1997)

    1997

  52. [52]

    Pines, Electron interaction in solids, Canadian Journal of Physics34, 1379 (1956)

    D. Pines, Electron interaction in solids, Canadian Journal of Physics34, 1379 (1956). 8 Supplementary materials for: Quantum Electron Quasicrystal Pierre-Antoine Graham1, Filippo Gaggioli 1, Liang Fu1 1Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA-02139, USA I. COMMENSURA TE TRIANGULAR ST ACKINGS To obtain the angle dependenc...

    1956

  53. [53]

    For a commensurate twist angleθ∈[0,60 ◦], the two lattices share special coincidence points forming a superlattice

    The stacking is specified by a rotation by an angleθofℓ= 2 with respect toℓ= 1. For a commensurate twist angleθ∈[0,60 ◦], the two lattices share special coincidence points forming a superlattice. The associated supercell gives the smallest repeating unit of the bilayer crystal pattern and is generated by primitive vectorsA 1,A 2 that connect neighboring c...

  54. [54]

    It follows that |Br 1|2 =|B r 2|2 =G 2(p2 +pq+q 2) =G 2N/2 are inversely proportional to|B 1|2 =|B 2|2 = 2G2/N

    When layer 1 and 2 are twisted by an angleθ, the reciprocal lattices are also twisted byθcorresponding to the same pair of integers (p, q) as the direct lattice. It follows that |Br 1|2 =|B r 2|2 =G 2(p2 +pq+q 2) =G 2N/2 are inversely proportional to|B 1|2 =|B 2|2 = 2G2/N. 9 (p, q) (2,1) (3,1) (8,3) (11,4) (30,11) N 14 26 194 362 2702 Twist 21.79 27.80 29...