arxiv: 2605.06321 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves from Astrophysical Sources: Theory, Detection, and Applications

Zhiwei Chen , Youjun Lu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 06:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc

keywords gravitational wave lensingastrophysical sourcesgeometric opticswave opticscosmological parametersdark matterHubble constantdetection strategies

0 comments

The pith

Lensed gravitational waves from merging black holes and other compact objects produce multiple images or frequency-modulated waveforms that can constrain dark matter and the Hubble constant.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how gravitational waves from distant astrophysical sources such as stellar-mass binary mergers can be gravitationally lensed by intervening stars, black holes, galaxies, or clusters. Lensing falls into two regimes: geometric optics, which creates multiple images separated by time delays and magnifications when the wavelength is much smaller than the lens scale, and wave optics, which introduces frequency-dependent distortions in the waveform when the scales are comparable. Lensed events are identified either by finding pairs of signals with overlapping parameters or by spotting characteristic modulations that unlensed signals lack. Detection prospects depend on source and lens population models, with future observatories expected to see enough events for applications in cosmology and fundamental physics.

Core claim

Once detected, lensed gravitational wave signals serve as probes of fundamental physics and cosmology because their time delays, magnifications, and waveform features encode information about intervening mass distributions and cosmological distances.

What carries the argument

The split into geometric-optics and wave-optics regimes for gravitational-wave lensing, together with identification methods based on parameter overlap or frequency-dependent modulations, forms the framework for recognizing and interpreting these signals.

If this is right

Lensed events can place limits on the abundance and clustering properties of dark matter candidates including primordial black holes.
Time delays between images provide an independent route to measuring the Hubble constant and other cosmological parameters.
Waveform modulations in the wave-optics regime can reveal the mass and density profiles of individual lenses from stars to galaxy clusters.
Search pipelines that look for parameter-matched pairs or specific modulations will become standard tools once event rates rise.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Wave-optics signatures might allow gravitational waves to resolve smaller lens structures than electromagnetic lensing can access.
Cross-matching lensed gravitational-wave events with electromagnetic lensing surveys could test consistency of lens models across messengers.
Non-detection at predicted rates could tighten upper limits on certain dark-matter scenarios even before positive identifications occur.

Load-bearing premise

Current models of the redshift and mass distributions of gravitational-wave sources and lenses are assumed to predict enough detectable lensed events for next-generation detectors without large revisions.

What would settle it

A complete absence of lensed events in the first several years of operation of detectors expected to observe thousands of mergers annually would indicate that either the lensing probability or the underlying population models require major adjustment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06321 by Youjun Lu, Zhiwei Chen.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: A schematic diagram to illustrate the gravitational lensing of gravitational waves in the view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: A schematic diagram to illustrate the gravitational lensing of gravitational waves in the wave view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The amplification factor F(f) (left: absolute value; right: complex phase) for a source located at y = 1.1 diffractively lensed by a lens with mass of 3 × 103M⊙ assuming the Singular Isothermal Spherical (SIS) profile. can contribute to the amplification and phase adjustments. In the geometric regime, this partial differential equation reduces to the standard lens equation (see Eq. 26), which embodies the… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The cosmic merger rate density evolution view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Estimates for the Detection rate of strongly lensed CBC and MBBH systems by different GW view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The redshift evolution of the lensing optical depth for galaxies (red dashed) and galaxy clusters view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The differential detection rate of sBBH mergers diffractively lensed by minihalos with LIGO A+ view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Steps for precise cosmological inference via the strongly lensed gravitational wave signals. view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Gravitational waves (GWs) from distant sources such as inspiralling and merging stellar-mass compact binaries, intermediate-mass and supermassive-binary-black-hole can be gravitationally lensed by intervening objects, ranging from stars and primordial black holes to galaxies and clusters. Depending on the GW wavelength relative to the lens scale, lensing occurs in two regimes: geometric optics, producing multiple images with time delays and magnifications, and wave optics, resulting in frequency-dependent waveform modulations. Lensed signals are identified via parameter overlap between event pairs or characteristic frequency-dependent modulations that distinguish them from unlensed signals. Detection rates depend on the redshift and mass distributions of sources and lenses, with promising prospects for future observatories. Once confirmed, lensed GWs will be powerful probes of fundamental physics and cosmology: they can constrain dark matter, lensing structures, the Hubble constant, and other cosmological parameters. In this review, we provide a concise overview of GW lensing, covering the theoretical framework, predicted detection rates, search strategies, and applications. We conclude with prospects and future directions for observing and exploiting lensed astrophysical GW events.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This is a review that organizes existing ideas on GW lensing but adds no new equations, data, or methods.

read the letter

This review paper on gravitational lensing of gravitational waves from astrophysical sources does not present original derivations or results. It pulls together the standard theoretical setup, search methods, and possible uses from prior work into one place. The abstract makes clear that the core content is an overview rather than fresh analysis. That is the main thing to know up front. The paper does a reasonable job laying out the two regimes: geometric optics when the wavelength is much smaller than the lens, which gives multiple images with time delays and magnifications, and wave optics when the wavelength is comparable to the lens scale, which produces frequency-dependent waveform changes. It also sketches how events might be identified through parameter overlaps between pairs or through those characteristic modulations, and it notes that rates will depend on source and lens populations. The applications to dark matter constraints, lensing structure, and the Hubble constant are framed as future prospects once detections occur, which matches the current state of the field. The soft spots are the ones you would expect from a review. Everything rests on cited literature, so the value hinges on whether the coverage is complete and balanced; without the full text it is hard to judge if key papers are missed or if the synthesis adds anything beyond a list. The detection prospects are called promising for future detectors, but this rests on population models that remain uncertain, and the paper acknowledges that without trying to resolve it. No internal contradictions show up in the provided framing. This paper is mainly for people who want a compact entry point into the topic, such as students or researchers moving into multi-messenger work. Someone already active in GW lensing or strong lensing will likely know the material already. It shows honest engagement with the literature and avoids overclaiming current capabilities. I would bring it to a reading group if the group is surveying future GW science directions, but I would not cite it in my own papers in the next year because it contains no new findings to reference. It deserves peer review as a review article because the subject is timely and the presentation appears measured.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review paper that summarizes the theory of gravitational lensing of astrophysical gravitational waves, distinguishing geometric-optics (multiple images, time delays, magnifications) from wave-optics (frequency-dependent modulations) regimes, methods for identifying lensed events via parameter overlap or waveform features, dependence of detection rates on source/lens redshift and mass distributions, and prospective applications to constraining dark matter, lens structures, the Hubble constant, and other cosmological parameters. It concludes with prospects for future detectors.

Significance. If the review accurately and comprehensively captures the literature, it offers a concise, accessible synthesis of an emerging area that can help researchers navigate the transition from current non-detections to future multi-messenger constraints on fundamental physics and cosmology. The conditional framing of applications ('once confirmed') and explicit dependence of rates on population models are appropriately cautious and strengthen the paper's utility as a reference.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that detection rates 'depend on the redshift and mass distributions' but does not quantify the sensitivity to current uncertainties in those distributions; a brief sentence or reference to the range of predicted rates in the main text would help readers assess robustness.
The distinction between identification via 'parameter overlap' versus 'characteristic frequency-dependent modulations' is stated at high level; a short table or flowchart contrasting the two approaches (with example false-positive rates from the literature) would improve clarity for non-specialist readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive and constructive review. We are pleased that the manuscript is viewed as an accurate and accessible synthesis of the emerging field of gravitational-wave lensing, and we appreciate the endorsement for acceptance.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: review paper with no new derivations

full rationale

This is a review summarizing established general relativity results and prior GW lensing literature on theory, identification, rates, and applications. No new derivations, predictions, or fitted parameters are introduced within the paper; all claims are conditional prospects ('once confirmed') drawn from external sources. The content is self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing steps that reduce to self-citation chains or internal definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

This review relies on standard assumptions from general relativity and astrophysical population models without introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (2)

standard math General relativity accurately describes both the propagation of gravitational waves and the deflection of null geodesics by intervening masses
Invoked throughout the description of geometric and wave optics regimes for lensing.
domain assumption Source and lens populations follow redshift and mass distributions that can be modeled from current observations
Used to estimate detection rates and prospects for future observatories.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5502 in / 1417 out tokens · 54695 ms · 2026-05-08T06:00:34.901855+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

261 extracted references · 195 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

[1]

P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T

Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016a, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 131102, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.116.1311022, 7 —. 2016b, Phys. Rev. Lett., 116, 241102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.2411024 —. 2017a, ApJ, 848, L12, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c92 —. 2017b, ApJ, 848, L13, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aa920c2 —. 2017c, Nature, 551, 85, doi:10.1038/natu...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.2411024 2041
[2]

2024, ApJ, 970, 191, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e83 32, 33, 34

Abbott, R., Abe, H., Acernese, F., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 191, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e83 32, 33, 34

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3e83 2024
[3]

D., Abraham, S., et al

Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2020b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2010.14527.https:// arxiv.org/abs/2010.145272 —. 2021, ApJ, 923, 14, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac23db32, 33, 34

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac23db32 2010
[4]

T., Gosenca, M., & Hotchkiss, S

Adamek, J., Byrnes, C. T., Gosenca, M., & Hotchkiss, S. 2019, Phys. Rev. D, 100, 023506, doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.100.02350621

2019
[5]

X., Arai, K., Brooks, A

Adhikari, R. X., Arai, K., Brooks, A. F., et al. 2020, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 37, 165003, doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab91432

work page doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ab91432 2020
[6]

M., et al

Agazie, G., Anumarlapudi, A., Archibald, A. M., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 951, L8, doi:10.3847/ 2041-8213/acdac62, 7 —. 2023b, Astrophys J, 951, L50, doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace18a15

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ace18a15 2041
[7]

Fukushima, Phase diagrams in the three-flavor Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the Polyakov loop, Phys

Ajith, P., Babak, S., Chen, Y ., et al. 2008, Phys. Rev. D, 77, 104017, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77. 1040175

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77 2008
[8]

A., Alves, D., et al

Alcock, C., Allsman, R. A., Alves, D., et al. 1997, ApJ, 486, 697, doi:10.1086/30453520

work page doi:10.1086/30453520 1997
[9]

R., Freitag, M., et al

Amaro-Seoane, P., Gair, J. R., Freitag, M., et al. 2007, Classical and Quantum Gravity, 24, R113, doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/17/R012

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/24/17/r012 2007
[10]

Laser Interferometer Space Antenna

Amaro-Seoane, P., Audley, H., Babak, S., et al. 2017, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1702.00786, doi:10. 48550/arXiv.1702.007862, 7

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2017
[11]

2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 2, doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y3

Amaro-Seoane, P., Andrews, J., Arca Sedda, M., et al. 2023, Living Reviews in Relativity, 26, 2, doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y3

work page doi:10.1007/s41114-022-00041-y3 2023
[12]

2015a, ApJ, 806, L8, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L8 17 —

Antonini, F., Barausse, E., & Silk, J. 2015a, ApJ, 806, L8, doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L8 17 —. 2015b, ApJ, 812, 72, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/7217

work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/l8 2041
[13]

Arnowitt, R., Deser, S., & Misner, C. W. 2008, General Relativity and Gravitation, 40, 1997, doi:10. 1007/s10714-008-0661-15

2008
[15]

Spin memory effect for compact binaries in the post-Newtonian approx- imation

Babak, S., Gair, J., Sesana, A., et al. 2017, Phys. Rev. D, 95, 103012, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95. 1030122

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95 2017
[16]

N., & Wolf, R

Bahcall, J. N., & Wolf, R. A. 1976, ApJ, 209, 214, doi:10.1086/15471121

work page doi:10.1086/15471121 1976
[17]

2012, MNRAS, 423, 600, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20901.x

Barausse, E. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 2533, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21057.x17

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21057.x17 2012
[18]

2020, ApJ, 904, 16, doi:10

Barausse, E., Dvorkin, I., Tremmel, M., V olonteri, M., & Bonetti, M. 2020, ApJ, 904, 16, doi:10. 3847/1538-4357/abba7f17

2020
[19]

Barsode, K

Barsode, A., Maity, K. N., & Ajith, P. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.23238, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2510.2323826

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

W., & Shapiro, S

Baumgarte, T. W., & Shapiro, S. L. 2010, Numerical Relativity: Solving Einstein’s Equations on the Computer 5

2010
[22]

, eprint =

Beaulieu, J.-P., Bennett, D. P., Fouqu´e, P., et al. 2006, Nature, 439, 437, doi:10.1038/nature04441 20

work page doi:10.1038/nature04441 2006
[23]

Nesvorný, D., Vokrouhlický, D., Morbidelli, A.,

Belczynski, K., Repetto, S., Holz, D. E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 819, 108, doi:10.3847/0004-637X/ 819/2/10813, 14

work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/ 2016
[24]

, keywords =

Belczynski, K., Ryu, T., Perna, R., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 4702, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1759 24

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1759 2017
[25]

E., Kalogera, V ., Rasio, F

Belczynski, K., Taam, R. E., Kalogera, V ., Rasio, F. A., & Bulik, T. 2007, ApJ, 662, 504, doi:10. 1086/51356213 Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves 37

2007
[27]

1985, ApJS, 58, 39, doi:10.1086/19102821

Bertschinger, E. 1985, ApJS, 58, 39, doi:10.1086/19102821

work page doi:10.1086/19102821 1985
[28]

Biesiada, M., Ding, X., Pi ´orkowska, A., & Zhu, Z.-H. 2014, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2014, 080, doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/08018

work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/10/08018 2014
[29]

2018, Physics of the Dark Universe, 22, 189, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018

Birrer, S., & Amara, A. 2018, Physics of the Dark Universe, 22, 189, doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018. 11.00210

work page doi:10.1016/j.dark.2018 2018
[30]

The james webb space telescope mission: Optical telescope element design, development, and performance,

Biwer, C. M., Capano, C. D., De, S., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 024503, doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ aaef0b5

work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ 2019
[31]

2014, Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 2, doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-24

Blanchet, L. 2014, Living Reviews in Relativity, 17, 2, doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-24

work page doi:10.12942/lrr-2014-24 2014
[32]

1960, Nature, 186, 535, doi:10.1038/186535a03

Bondi, H. 1960, Nature, 186, 535, doi:10.1038/186535a03

work page doi:10.1038/186535a03 1960
[33]

Bondi, H., van der Burg, M. G. J., & Metzner, A. W. K. 1962, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A, 269, 21, doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.01613

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1962.01613 1962
[35]

2019, MNRAS, 486, 4044, doi:10

Bonetti, M., Sesana, A., Haardt, F., Barausse, E., & Colpi, M. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 4044, doi:10. 1093/mnras/stz90317

2019
[36]

1990, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 289, 518, doi:10.1016/0168-9002(90)91525-G7

Bradaschia, C., Del Fabbro, R., Di Virgilio, A., et al. 1990, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A, 289, 518, doi:10.1016/0168-9002(90)91525-G7

work page doi:10.1016/0168-9002(90)91525-g7 1990
[37]

I., Grillmair, C

Byun, Y . I., Grillmair, C. J., Faber, S. M., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1889, doi:10.1086/11792719

work page doi:10.1086/11792719 1996
[38]

Cai, R.-G., Chen, T., Wang, S.-J., & Yang, X.-Y . 2023, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2023, 043, doi:10. 1088/1475-7516/2023/03/04321

2023
[39]

B., Suyu, S

Caminha, G. B., Suyu, S. H., Grillo, C., & Rosati, P. 2022, A&A, 657, A83, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/20214199419

2022
[40]

Canevarolo, S., & Chisari, N. E. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 36, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae171317

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae171317 2024
[41]

Cannon, S

Cannon, K., et al. 2020.https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.050823

work page arXiv 2020
[42]

2018, MNRAS, 474, 4997, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx308713, 24

Cao, L., Lu, Y ., & Zhao, Y . 2018, MNRAS, 474, 4997, doi:10.1093/mnras/stx308713, 24

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx308713 2018
[43]

2021, MNRAS, 502, L16, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa20529

Cao, S., Qi, J., Biesiada, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, L16, doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa20529

work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaa20529 2021
[44]

2022, A&A, 659, L5, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20214269429

Cao, S., Qi, J., Cao, Z., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, L5, doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20214269429

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20214269429 2022
[45]

2025, MNRAS, 540, 3121, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf89118 —

Cao, X., Li, R., Li, N., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 540, 3121, doi:10.1093/mnras/staf89118 —. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 1960, doi:10.1093/mnras/stae186518 C ¸ alıs ¸kan, M., Ezquiaga, J. M., Hannuksela, O. A., & Holz, D. E. 2023, Phys. Rev. D, 107, 063023, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.06302325, 26, 32

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf89118 2025
[46]

2024, ApJ, 961, 206, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0dfd14

Chen, K., & Dai, Z.-G. 2024, ApJ, 961, 206, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0dfd14

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad0dfd14 2024
[47]

2022a, ApJ, 924, 49, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac31ad18

Chen, S., Wen, X., Gao, H., et al. 2022a, ApJ, 924, 49, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac31ad18

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac31ad18
[48]

2020, ApJ, 897, 86, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab959416, 17 —

Chen, Y ., Yu, Q., & Lu, Y . 2020, ApJ, 897, 86, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab959416, 17 —. 2023, ApJ, 955, 132, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace59f17 —. 2024a, ApJ, 974, 261, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad75822

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab959416 2020
[50]

2023, ApJ, 953, 36, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace04523, 24, 26, 29

Chen, Z. 2023, ApJ, 953, 36, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace04523, 24, 26, 29

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace04523 2023
[51]

2024b, ApJ, 962, 3, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad19d329

Chen, Z., Lu, Y ., & Chen, Y . 2024b, ApJ, 962, 3, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad19d329

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad19d329
[52]

2024c, ApJ, 973, 159, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6de013

Chen, Z., Lu, Y ., Wang, J., et al. 2024c, ApJ, 973, 159, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6de013

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6de013
[53]

2025, To be submitted 30

Chen, Z., Lu, Y ., & Zeng, C. 2025, To be submitted 30

2025
[54]

2022b, ApJ, 940, 17, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac98b73, 14, 29

Chen, Z., Lu, Y ., & Zhao, Y . 2022b, ApJ, 940, 17, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac98b73, 14, 29

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac98b73
[55]

2024d, ApJ, 977, 64, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b4419, 24

Chen, Z., Xie, Y ., Lu, Y ., et al. 2024d, ApJ, 977, 64, doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b4419, 24

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b4419
[57]

2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.14397, doi:10

Chen, Z., Zhang, J., Lu, Y ., Liu, J., & Zeng, C. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.14397, doi:10. 48550/arXiv.2508.1439713 38 Chen & Lu

work page arXiv
[58]

H.-Y ., Ng, K

Cheung, M. H.-Y ., Ng, K. K. Y ., Zumalac´arregui, M., & Berti, E. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 124020, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.12402022, 29

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.12402022 2024
[59]

G., Jung, S., Lu, P., & Takhistov, V

Choi, H. G., Jung, S., Lu, P., & Takhistov, V . 2024, Phys. Rev. Lett., 133, 101002, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.133.10100227

2024
[60]

Choi, Y .-Y ., Park, C., & V ogeley, M. S. 2007, ApJ, 658, 884, doi:10.1086/51106018

work page doi:10.1086/51106018 2007
[61]

https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412

Chu, Q., Lu, Y ., & Yu, S. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.15464, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412. 1546413

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412 2024
[62]

2022, MNRAS, 509, 1557, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab288213, 24

Chu, Q., Yu, S., & Lu, Y . 2022, MNRAS, 509, 1557, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab288213, 24

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab288213 2022
[63]

Relativistic continuous matrix product states for quantum fields without cutoff.Phys

Chung, A. K.-W., & Li, T. G. F. 2021, Phys. Rev. D, 104, 124060, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104. 12406029

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.104 2021
[64]

Aaijet al.[LHCb Collaboration]

Collett, T. E., & Bacon, D. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 091101, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 118.09110129

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2017
[65]

W., Dietrich, T., Margalit, B., & Metzger, B

Coughlin, M. W., Dietrich, T., Margalit, B., & Metzger, B. D. 2019, MNRAS, 489, L91, doi:10. 1093/mnrasl/slz1332

2019
[66]

A., Foley, R

Coulter, D. A., Foley, R. J., Kilpatrick, C. D., et al. 2017, Science, 358, 1556, doi:10.1126/ science.aap98112

2017
[68]

2018, Phys

Dai, L., Li, S.-S., Zackay, B., Mao, S., & Lu, Y . 2018, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 104029, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.98.10402923

2018
[69]

2000, Phys

Damour, T., Jaranowski, P., & Sch ¨afer, G. 2000, Phys. Rev. D, 62, 084011, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.62.0840114

2000
[70]

M., et al

De, S., Finstad, D., Lattimer, J. M., et al. 2018, Phys. Rev. Lett., 121, 091102, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.121.0911022 de Mink, S. E., & Belczynski, K. 2015, ApJ, 814, 58, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/5813

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/5813 2018
[71]

2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 115019, doi:10

Diao, J., Pan, Y ., & Xu, W. 2022, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 22, 115019, doi:10. 1088/1674-4527/ac977f18

2022
[72]

Diego, J. M. 2020, Phys. Rev. D, 101, 123512, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.12351229

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.12351229 2020
[74]

Ding, X., Biesiada, M., & Zhu, Z.-H. 2015, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2015, 006, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2015/12/00623, 24

2015
[76]

2012, ApJ, 759, 52, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/ 1/5213 —

Dominik, M., Belczynski, K., Fryer, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 759, 52, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/759/ 1/5213 —. 2013, ApJ, 779, 72, doi:10.1088/0004-637X/779/1/7213, 24

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/759/ 2012
[78]

2024, Phys

Ellis, J., Fairbairn, M., Franciolini, G., et al. 2024, Phys. Rev. D, 109, 023522, doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.0235227 EPTA Collaboration, InPTA Collaboration, Antoniadis, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 678, A50, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/2023468442, 7 EPTA Collaboration, E., Collaboration, I., Antoniadis, J., et al. 2024, Astron Astrophys, 690, A118, doi:10.1051/0004-...

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/20234856815 2024
[79]

2019, A&A, 631, A175, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/20193537520

Erfanianfar, G., Finoguenov, A., Furnell, K., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A175, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/20193537520

2019
[80]

Eroshenko, Y . N. 2016, Astronomy Letters, 42, 347, doi:10.1134/S106377371606001321 Euclid Collaboration, Leuzzi, L., Meneghetti, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A68, doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/20234724418

work page doi:10.1134/s106377371606001321 2016
[81]

Fairbairn, M., Urrutia, J., & Vaskonen, V . 2023, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys., 2023, 007, doi:10.1088/ 1475-7516/2023/07/0073, 27 Gravitational Lensing of Gravitational Waves 39

2023
[82]

2020, Chin

Fan, X. 2020, Chin. Sci. Bull., 66, 2516, doi:10.1360/TB-2020-11703

work page doi:10.1360/tb-2020-11703 2020
[83]

2017, Phys

Fan, X.-L., Liao, K., Biesiada, M., Pi ´orkowska-Kurpas, A., & Zhu, Z.-H. 2017, Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 091102, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.09110229

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.09110229 2017
[84]

Fragione, G., Grishin, E., Leigh, N. W. C., Perets, H. B., & Perna, R. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 47, doi:10. 1093/mnras/stz165114, 15

2019
[85]

Abdollahi, et al.,FermiLarge Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog, Astrophys

Fragos, T., Andrews, J. J., Bavera, S. S., et al. 2023, ApJS, 264, 45, doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ ac90c113

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ 2023
[86]

2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.13967, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2304.1396725

Gao, Z., Liao, K., Yang, L., & Zhu, Z.-H. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.13967, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2304.1396725

work page arXiv 2023
[87]

J., Hames, C., et al

Garofalo, D., Christian, D. J., Hames, C., et al. 2023, The Open Journal of Astrophysics, 6, 27, doi:10. 21105/astro.2304.0258116

work page arXiv 2023
[88]

Gaudi, B. S. 2012, ARA&A, 50, 411, doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-12551820 Gautham Bhaskar, H., Li, G., & Lin, D. N. C. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2204.07282.https:// arxiv.org/abs/2204.0728214

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-12551820 2012
[89]

2021, MNRAS, 503, 1319, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab51918

Geng, S., Cao, S., Liu, Y ., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 1319, doi:10.1093/mnras/stab51918

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab51918 2021
[91]

2002, A&A, 390, 821, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:2002063919

Golse, G., & Kneib, J.-P. 2002, A&A, 390, 821, doi:10.1051/0004-6361:2002063919

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:2002063919 2002

Showing first 80 references.