pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06354 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🧮 math.AP

Recognition: unknown

H\"older Stability from Exact Uniqueness for Finite-Dimensional Analytic Inverse Problems

C\u{a}t\u{a}lin I. C\^arstea

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 07:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords analytic inverse problemsHölder stabilityexact uniquenessfinite-dimensional parametersLojasiewicz inequalityboundary measurementsconductivity inverse problemelasticity inverse problem
0
0 comments X

The pith

If real analytic boundary measurements uniquely determine a finite-dimensional parameter, they determine it with Hölder stability on compact sets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that in finite-dimensional parameter spaces, if a real analytic operator F mapping parameters to boundary measurements satisfies that equal measurements imply equal recovered quantities R, then R can be recovered with Hölder stability from F on any compact set of parameters. This is significant because it turns qualitative uniqueness results into quantitative stability estimates without needing additional assumptions. The argument scalarizes the equality F(p) = F(q) using a Hilbert-Schmidt product and invokes the Lojasiewicz inequality to control the distance. It further establishes that the stability persists when only finitely many scalar data elements are used, drawn from dense families of inputs and tests. The theorem is illustrated with examples from anisotropic conductivity and elasticity inverse problems.

Core claim

If the boundary measurement operator F is real analytic on an open set U in R^m and satisfies the uniqueness condition that F(p) equals F(q) only when R(p) equals R(q), then the map R satisfies a Hölder stability estimate on every compact subset of U. The proof proceeds by reducing the operator equality to a scalar equation via Hilbert-Schmidt inner product and then using the Lojasiewicz distance inequality for real analytic functions. Additionally, after fixing countable dense families of inputs and tests, only finitely many matrix elements of the data are needed to achieve the same Hölder recovery.

What carries the argument

The exact uniqueness condition for the real analytic operator F, scalarized via Hilbert-Schmidt product and controlled by the Lojasiewicz inequality to produce Hölder stability for R.

Load-bearing premise

The operator F must be real analytic and satisfy exact uniqueness with respect to R, in a finite-dimensional parameter space.

What would settle it

A counterexample consisting of a real analytic F on a finite-dimensional U where F(p)=F(q) implies R(p)=R(q) but the difference |R(p)-R(q)| is not bounded by C |F(p)-F(q)|^alpha for any alpha>0 on some compact set.

read the original abstract

We prove a stability theorem for finite-dimensional analytic inverse problems. Let \(U\subset\R^m\) be an open parameter set, let \(F(p)\) be a boundary measurement operator, and let \(R(p)\) be the finite-dimensional quantity to be recovered. If \(F\) is real analytic and \[ F(p)=F(q)\quad\Longrightarrow\quad R(p)=R(q), \] then \(R\) satisfies a H\"older stability estimate on every compact subset of \(U\). The proof uses a Hilbert--Schmidt scalarization of the operator equation \(F(p)=F(q)\) and the \L{}ojasiewicz distance inequality. We also prove that, after fixing countable dense families of boundary inputs and tests, finitely many scalar matrix elements of the data give the same H\"older recovery on compact parameter sets. This finite-measurement conclusion is qualitative: the proof does not give an effective measurement list, exponent, or constant. The finite-measurement statement follows from finite determinacy of real analytic zero sets. We apply the result to local Neumann-to-Dirichlet data for piecewise constant anisotropic conductivities and to localized Dirichlet-to-Neumann data for piecewise homogeneous anisotropic elasticity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proves that if the forward measurement operator F is real analytic on an open set U ⊂ ℝ^m and satisfies the exact uniqueness condition F(p) = F(q) ⇒ R(p) = R(q), then the finite-dimensional recovery map R satisfies a Hölder stability estimate on every compact subset of U. The argument scalarizes the operator equation via Hilbert–Schmidt inner products to produce an analytic function g(p, q) whose zero set coincides with the set where F(p) = F(q), then invokes the Łojasiewicz inequality. A finite-measurement version follows from finite determinacy of real-analytic zero sets. The result is applied to local Neumann-to-Dirichlet data for piecewise-constant anisotropic conductivities and to localized Dirichlet-to-Neumann data for piecewise-homogeneous anisotropic elasticity.

Significance. If the central implication holds, the manuscript supplies a general, abstract route from qualitative uniqueness to quantitative Hölder stability in finite-dimensional analytic inverse problems. The approach is noteworthy for its use of the Łojasiewicz inequality and the finite-determinacy argument that yields a qualitative finite-measurement conclusion without explicit constants or exponents. The applications to conductivity and elasticity illustrate concrete settings where the hypotheses can be verified.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Theorem 1.1] Abstract and main theorem statement: the claimed implication (analyticity of F plus exact uniqueness ⇒ Hölder stability of R) is stated without any regularity hypothesis on R. The proof route via Łojasiewicz requires that R(p) − R(q) itself be real analytic in (p, q) so that it vanishes on the zero set of the analytic scalarization g and therefore satisfies |R(p) − R(q)| ≤ C |g(p, q)|^β. Without this assumption the statement is false (counter-example: F(p) = p on an interval and R any continuous but non-Hölder function). The applications treat R as the vector of piecewise-constant parameter values, which is analytic, but the general theorem must state the analyticity requirement on R explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the need to explicitly state the analyticity of the recovery map R in the main theorem. We agree that this is a necessary hypothesis for the application of the Łojasiewicz inequality and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract / Theorem 1.1] Abstract and main theorem statement: the claimed implication (analyticity of F plus exact uniqueness ⇒ Hölder stability of R) is stated without any regularity hypothesis on R. The proof route via Łojasiewicz requires that R(p) − R(q) itself be real analytic in (p, q) so that it vanishes on the zero set of the analytic scalarization g and therefore satisfies |R(p) − R(q)| ≤ C |g(p, q)|^β. Without this assumption the statement is false (counter-example: F(p) = p on an interval and R any continuous but non-Hölder function). The applications treat R as the vector of piecewise-constant parameter values, which is analytic, but the general theorem must state the analyticity requirement on R explicitly.

    Authors: We agree with this comment. The proof indeed relies on R being real analytic so that R(p) - R(q) is analytic and the Łojasiewicz inequality can be applied to bound |R(p) - R(q)| by a power of |g(p,q)|. The counterexample is correct and shows that without analyticity of R the conclusion fails. In our applications, R(p) coincides with the parameter vector p itself (the piecewise constant values), which is analytic. We will revise the abstract, the statement of Theorem 1.1, and relevant parts of the introduction to explicitly include the assumption that R is real analytic on U. This is a straightforward clarification and does not affect the validity of the results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; proof relies on external theorems without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The derivation claims that real-analyticity of the forward map F together with the exact uniqueness implication F(p)=F(q) ⇒ R(p)=R(q) yields a Hölder stability estimate for R on compact subsets of the finite-dimensional domain U. The argument proceeds by Hilbert-Schmidt scalarization to produce an auxiliary analytic function g(p,q) whose zero set coincides with the level set of F, followed by an application of the Łojasiewicz inequality. No step reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs: there are no self-definitional equivalences, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations whose content is itself unverified within the manuscript. The central implication is supported by external, independently established results (Łojasiewicz inequality and finite determinacy of real-analytic zero sets) rather than by any tautological renaming or internal fit. The finite-measurement corollary is likewise derived from the same external analytic properties and does not collapse to the uniqueness assumption alone. The paper is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard theorems in real analytic geometry and operator theory, with no new free parameters or invented entities introduced by the paper.

axioms (3)
  • standard math The Łojasiewicz inequality holds for real analytic functions
    Invoked to obtain the distance estimate from the scalarized equation.
  • domain assumption Hilbert-Schmidt scalarization of the operator equation preserves the zero set properties
    Used to reduce the vector-valued operator equation to scalar analytic functions.
  • standard math Real analytic zero sets are finitely determined
    Supports the finite-measurement conclusion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1561 out tokens · 87392 ms · 2026-05-08T07:04:25.787709+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alberti, Ángel Arroyo, and Matteo Santacesaria

    Giovanni S. Alberti, Ángel Arroyo, and Matteo Santacesaria. Inverse problems on low-dimensional manifolds.Nonlinearity, 36(1):734–808, 2023. doi:10.1088/1361-6544/aca73d

  2. [2]

    Alberti and Matteo Santacesaria

    Giovanni S. Alberti and Matteo Santacesaria. Calderon’s inverse problem with a finite number of measurements.Forum of Mathematics, Sigma, 7:e35, 2019. doi:10.1017/fms.2019.31

  3. [3]

    Alberti and Matteo Santacesaria

    Giovanni S. Alberti and Matteo Santacesaria. Infinite-dimensional inverse prob- lems with finite measurements.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 243(1):1–31, 2022. doi:10.1007/s00205-021-01718-4

  4. [4]

    Alessandrini

    Giovanni Alessandrini. Stable determination of conductivity by boundary measurements.Applicable Analysis, 27(1–3):153–172, 1988. doi:10.1080/00036818808839730

  5. [5]

    de Hoop, and Romina Gaburro

    Giovanni Alessandrini, Maarten V. de Hoop, and Romina Gaburro. Unique- ness for the electrostatic inverse boundary value problem with piecewise constant anisotropic conductivities.Inverse Problems, 33(12):125013, 2017. doi:10.1088/1361-6420/aa982d. STABILITY FROM UNIQUENESS FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS 24

  6. [6]

    de Hoop, Romina Gaburro, and Eva Sincich

    Giovanni Alessandrini, Maarten V. de Hoop, Romina Gaburro, and Eva Sincich. Lipschitz stability for the electrostatic inverse boundary value problem with piecewise linear conductivities.Journal de Mathématiques Pures et Appliquées, 107(5):638–664, 2017. doi:10.1016/j.matpur.2016.10.001

  7. [7]

    Determin- ing an anisotropic conductivity by boundary measurements: Stability at the boundary.Journal of Differential Equations, 382:115–140, 2024

    Giovanni Alessandrini, Romina Gaburro, and Eva Sincich. Determin- ing an anisotropic conductivity by boundary measurements: Stability at the boundary.Journal of Differential Equations, 382:115–140, 2024. doi:10.1016/j.jde.2023.11.001

  8. [8]

    Lipschitz stability for the inverse conductivity problem.Advances in Applied Mathematics, 35(2):207–241, 2005

    Giovanni Alessandrini and Sergio Vessella. Lipschitz stability for the inverse conductivity problem.Advances in Applied Mathematics, 35(2):207–241, 2005. doi:10.1016/j.aam.2004.12.002

  9. [9]

    Lipschitz stable determination of polyhedral conductivity inclusions from local boundary measurements.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 54(5):5182–5222, 2022

    Andrea Aspri, Elena Beretta, Elisa Francini, and Sergio Vessella. Lipschitz stable determination of polyhedral conductivity inclusions from local boundary measurements.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 54(5):5182–5222, 2022. doi:10.1137/22M1480550

  10. [10]

    de Hoop, Elisa Francini, Sergio Vessella, and Jian Zhai

    Elena Beretta, Maarten V. de Hoop, Elisa Francini, Sergio Vessella, and Jian Zhai. Uniqueness and Lipschitz stability of an inverse boundary value problem for time-harmonic elastic waves.Inverse Problems, 33(3):035013, 2017. doi:10.1088/1361-6420/aa5bef

  11. [11]

    de Hoop, and Lingyun Qiu

    Elena Beretta, Maarten V. de Hoop, and Lingyun Qiu. Lipschitz stability of an inverse boundary value problem for a Schrödinger-type equation.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 45(2):679–699, 2013. doi:10.1137/120869201

  12. [12]

    Lipschitz stability for the electrical impedance tomography problem: the complex case.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 36(10):1723–1749, 2011

    Elena Beretta and Elisa Francini. Lipschitz stability for the electrical impedance tomography problem: the complex case.Communications in Partial Differential Equations, 36(10):1723–1749, 2011. doi:10.1080/03605302.2011.552930

  13. [13]

    Lipschitz continuous dependence of piecewise constant Lamé coefficients from boundary data: the case of non-flat interfaces.Inverse Problems, 30(12):125005,

    Elena Beretta, Elisa Francini, Antonino Morassi, Edi Rosset, and Sergio Vessella. Lipschitz continuous dependence of piecewise constant Lamé coefficients from boundary data: the case of non-flat interfaces.Inverse Problems, 30(12):125005,

  14. [14]

    doi:10.1088/0266-5611/30/12/125005

  15. [15]

    Uniqueness and Lipschitz stability for the identification of Lamé parameters from boundary measurements

    Elena Beretta, Elisa Francini, and Sergio Vessella. Uniqueness and Lipschitz stability for the identification of Lamé parameters from boundary measurements. Inverse Problems and Imaging, 8(3):611–644, 2014. doi:10.3934/ipi.2014.8.611

  16. [16]

    Springer, Berlin, 1998

    Jacek Bochnak, Michel Coste, and Marie-Françoise Roy.Real Algebraic Geome- try, volume 36 ofErgebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete. Springer, Berlin, 1998

  17. [17]

    A remark on Lipschitz stability for inverse problems.Comptes Rendus Mathématique, 351(5–6):187–190, 2013

    Laurent Bourgeois. A remark on Lipschitz stability for inverse problems.Comptes Rendus Mathématique, 351(5–6):187–190, 2013. doi:10.1016/j.crma.2013.04.004

  18. [18]

    Calderón

    Alberto P. Calderón. On an inverse boundary value problem. InSeminar on Numerical Analysis and its Applications to Continuum Physics, pages 65–73. Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática, Rio de Janeiro, 1980

  19. [19]

    Cârstea, Naofumi Honda, and Gen Nakamura

    Cătălin I. Cârstea, Naofumi Honda, and Gen Nakamura. Uniqueness in the inverse boundary value problem for piecewise homogeneous anisotropic elasticity.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 50(3):3291–3302, 2018. doi:10.1137/17M1125662

  20. [20]

    Idéaux et modules de fonctions analytiques de variables complexes.Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 78:29–64, 1950

    Henri Cartan. Idéaux et modules de fonctions analytiques de variables complexes.Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France, 78:29–64, 1950. doi:10.24033/bsmf.1409. STABILITY FROM UNIQUENESS FOR INVERSE PROBLEMS 25

  21. [21]

    Ciarlet.Mathematical Elasticity

    Philippe G. Ciarlet.Mathematical Elasticity. Vol. I: Three-Dimensional Elas- ticity. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1988

  22. [22]

    Paul M. N. Feehan. Resolution of singularities and geometric proofs of the łojasiewicz inequalities.Geometry & Topology, 23(7):3273–3313, 2019. doi:10.2140/gt.2019.23.3273

  23. [23]

    Lipschitz stability for the inverse conductivity problem for a conformal class of anisotropic conductivities.Inverse Problems, 31(1):015008, 2015

    Romina Gaburro and Eva Sincich. Lipschitz stability for the inverse conductivity problem for a conformal class of anisotropic conductivities.Inverse Problems, 31(1):015008, 2015. doi:10.1088/0266-5611/31/1/015008

  24. [24]

    Uniqueness and Lipschitz stability in electrical impedance tomography with finitely many electrodes.Inverse Problems, 35(2):024005,

    Bastian Harrach. Uniqueness and Lipschitz stability in electrical impedance tomography with finitely many electrodes.Inverse Problems, 35(2):024005,

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1088/1361-6420/aaf6fc

  26. [26]

    Kohn and Michael Vogelius

    Robert V. Kohn and Michael Vogelius. Determining conductivity by boundary measurements.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 37(3):289– 298, 1984. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160370302

  27. [27]

    Kohn and Michael Vogelius

    Robert V. Kohn and Michael Vogelius. Determining conductivity by bound- ary measurements. II. interior results.Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 38(5):643–667, 1985. doi:10.1002/cpa.3160380513

  28. [28]

    Exponential instability in an inverse problem for the Schrödinger equation.Inverse Problems, 17(5):1435–1444, 2001

    Niculae Mandache. Exponential instability in an inverse problem for the Schrödinger equation.Inverse Problems, 17(5):1435–1444, 2001. doi:10.1088/0266-5611/17/5/313

  29. [29]

    Adrian I. Nachman. Global uniqueness for a two-dimensional inverse boundary value problem.Annals of Mathematics, 143(1):71–96, 1996. doi:10.2307/2118653

  30. [30]

    Lipschitz stability for the finite dimensional fractional Calderón problem with finite Cauchy data.Inverse Problems and Imaging, 13(5):1023–1044, 2019

    Angkana Rüland and Eva Sincich. Lipschitz stability for the finite dimensional fractional Calderón problem with finite Cauchy data.Inverse Problems and Imaging, 13(5):1023–1044, 2019. doi:10.3934/ipi.2019046

  31. [31]

    On Runge approximation and Lipschitz sta- bility for a finite-dimensional Schrödinger inverse problem.Applicable Analysis, 101(10):3655–3666, 2022

    Angkana Rüland and Eva Sincich. On Runge approximation and Lipschitz sta- bility for a finite-dimensional Schrödinger inverse problem.Applicable Analysis, 101(10):3655–3666, 2022. doi:10.1080/00036811.2020.1738403

  32. [32]

    Sylvester and G

    John Sylvester and Gunther Uhlmann. A global uniqueness theorem for an inverse boundary value problem.Annals of Mathematics, 125(1):153–169, 1987. doi:10.2307/1971291. Department of Applied Mathematics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan Email address:catalin.carstea@gmail.com