pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06449 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM

Recognition: unknown

Atmospheric turbulence profiling with the Multistar Turbulence Monitor

Weisen Huang , Bin Ma , Tengfei Song , Paul Hickson , Zhaohui Shang , Xuefei Zhang , Mingyu Zhao , Qing Zhou
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 05:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM
keywords atmospheric turbulenceCn2 profiledifferential image motionseeing monitoradaptive opticsturbulence profilingastronomical site testingMCMC inversion
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Multistar Turbulence Monitor recovers vertical atmospheric turbulence profiles from differential image motions of multiple stars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents the Multistar Turbulence Monitor as a method to derive the vertical profile of the refractive-index structure constant Cn2(z) by measuring differential image motion between stellar pairs in short-exposure frames. It combines theoretical modeling, numerical simulations using a standard HV turbulence profile, and on-sky observations collected over three nights at the Daocheng Astronomical Site. Simulations demonstrate that the Markov Chain Monte Carlo inversion pipeline recovers both the integrated seeing and the layered Cn2 distribution despite realistic centroiding noise and changes in pixel scale. The same pipeline yields stable results when thirteen discrete height nodes are used and supplies uncertainty estimates from the chain. On-sky comparisons show that MTM-derived seeing values closely follow simultaneous measurements from a Differential Image Motion Monitor, reproducing both rapid fluctuations and nightly averages.

Core claim

The MTM infers the vertical distribution of Cn2(z) from differential image motion measured between multiple stellar pairs in short-exposure frames. Simulations based on a standard HV turbulence model demonstrate that the MCMC inversion pipeline robustly recovers both the integrated seeing and the vertical turbulence profile under realistic centroiding noise and varying pixel scales. The MCMC inversion achieves stable results with thirteen discrete height nodes and provides reliable uncertainties. Three nights of MTM measurements at the Daocheng Astronomical Site show that MTM-derived seeing closely tracks simultaneous DIMM results, accurately reproducing both short-term fluctuations and the

What carries the argument

The MCMC inversion pipeline that maps differential image motions from stellar pairs to Cn2 values at thirteen discrete height nodes.

If this is right

  • MTM supplies both integrated seeing and a layered Cn2 profile in a single portable instrument.
  • The thirteen-node MCMC solution yields uncertainty estimates that can guide adaptive-optics performance predictions.
  • Routine nightly monitoring of turbulence conditions becomes feasible without dedicated large-aperture profilers.
  • The method supports site testing campaigns where equipment must be moved between locations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Portable MTM units could be deployed in coordinated campaigns to compare turbulence statistics across candidate observatory sites.
  • Feeding MTM layer heights into real-time AO controllers might improve correction bandwidth when strong layers are identified.
  • The fixed thirteen-node grid could be replaced by an adaptive node placement if future work shows that certain height intervals dominate the error budget.

Load-bearing premise

Differential image motion between stellar pairs directly and uniquely determines the discrete Cn2(z) profile via MCMC inversion without significant biases from centroiding errors, pixel scale variations, or the choice of height discretization.

What would settle it

Simultaneous MTM and DIMM observations at a site with strong, rapidly changing ground-layer turbulence that show large systematic offsets in integrated seeing, or Monte Carlo simulations that fail to recover the input Cn2 profile once realistic centroiding noise is injected.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06449 by Bin Ma, Mingyu Zhao, Paul Hickson, Qing Zhou, Tengfei Song, Weisen Huang, Xuefei Zhang, Zhaohui Shang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic diagram of the MTM principle. The panels illustrate the optical paths for stellar pairs with different angular separations 𝛼. Light traverses different paths through the turbulent atmosphere, entering a tele￾scope with aperture diameter 𝐷. The degree of overlap between the projected telescope pupils varies with height depending on the angular separation 𝛼. The turbulence-induced wavefront distort… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Response functions 𝑊 (𝛼, 𝑧) calculated for different ratios of the outer scale to the aperture diameter, 𝐿0/𝐷. The left panel shows the function value, while the right panel displays the function normalized by its asymptotic value at large separations (𝑊∞). The horizontal axis represents the normalized parameter 𝛼𝑧/𝐷. The response function indicates the sensitivity of the differential image motion variance… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Simulation-based inversion results for the RASA 11 (left column) and C925 HD (right column) configurations. Top row: Fitting of the differential image motion variance structure functions for a single realization. Bottom row: Statistical results of the retrieved turbulence profiles from 30 independent inversions. The solid black lines represent the input HV model (𝜀 = 1.0 ′′ , 𝐿0 = 10 m). The points with er… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Simulated RMS error of the retrieved seeing at different discrete heights as a function of the number of stars used in the inversion view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The MTM instruments deployed at the Daocheng Astronomical Site. For this study, only two configurations were utilized: the central telescope is RASA 11 (with the QHY268C camera), and the telescope on the right is C925 HD (with the ZWO ASI1600MM camera). The telescope on the far left was not used. Both telescopes are installed on the same equatorial mount to ensure synchronous tracking. and the short-term f… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Temporal evolution of atmospheric seeing measured at the Daocheng site. The upper panel shows the simultaneous observations on 5 January, comparing the wide-field RASA 11 (blue line) and high-resolution C925 HD (red line) results with the site-monitoring DIMM (black dots). The corresponding 𝐿0 measurements are plotted on the secondary y-axis (dark blue and dark red dash-dot lines). Error bars on the MTM da… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Correlation between MTM-derived seeing and simultaneous DIMM measurements obtained on 5 January. Left: MTM-derived seeing versus DIMM seeing. The red points represent data from the C925 HD configuration, while the blue points represent the RASA 11 configuration. Right: Comparison of the outer scale (𝐿0) measured by the RASA 11 and C925 HD systems, with extreme outliers excluded. Data points in both panels … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Snapshot of MTM inversion results obtained simultaneously from the RASA 11 (left) and C925 HD (right) systems on 5 January. Top panels: The observed differential image motion variance (dots) versus angular separation, overlaid with the best-fit model structure functions (solid lines). Bottom panels: Statistical results of the retrieved turbulence profiles from 30 MCMC realizations. Both configurations yiel… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spatiotemporal evolution of the refractive index structure constant 𝐶2 𝑛 measured over the three nights. The profiles are displayed as color-coded intensity maps, with height on a logarithmic scale. The color bar indicates the turbulence strength, ranging from weak turbulence (black) to strong optical turbulence (dark red). The atmosphere exhibits a pronounced stratification: a dominant, highly variable su… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Statistical vertical turbulence profiles for the nights of 5, 7, and 8 January. The black lines with markers represent the median 𝐶2 𝑛 values at each height node, while the blue and green dashed lines indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. A characteristic secondary peak around 10 km is visible, corresponding to the seasonal high-altitude wind shear. 69 Rajagopal J., Tokovinin A., Bustos E.… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accurate characterization of atmospheric optical turbulence is essential for evaluating astronomical sites and optimizing adaptive optics systems. The Multistar Turbulence Monitor (MTM) infers the vertical distribution of the refractive-index structure constant Cn2(z) from differential image motion measured between multiple stellar pairs in short-exposure frames. We present a comprehensive investigation of the MTM method, combining theoretical analysis, instrument-performance assessment, numerical simulations, and on-sky observations obtained at the Daocheng Astronomical Site. Simulations based on a standard HV turbulence model demonstrate that the inversion pipeline robustly recovers both the integrated seeing and the vertical turbulence profile under realistic centroiding noise and varying pixel scales. The Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) inversion achieves stable results with thirteen discrete height nodes and provides reliable uncertainties. Three nights of MTM measurements at the Daocheng Astronomical Site show that MTM-derived seeing closely tracks simultaneous Differential Image Motion Monitor (DIMM) results, accurately reproducing both short-term fluctuations and nightly averages. These results confirm that MTM provides a simple, portable, and versatile solution for atmospheric turbulence profiling and routine seeing monitoring.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the Multistar Turbulence Monitor (MTM), which infers the vertical Cn²(z) profile from differential image motion between multiple stellar pairs using MCMC inversion with thirteen discrete height nodes. Simulations based on the Hufnagel-Valley (HV) model show recovery of both integrated seeing and the profile under centroiding noise and pixel-scale variations. Three nights of on-sky data at Daocheng Astronomical Site demonstrate that MTM-derived seeing closely tracks simultaneous DIMM measurements, reproducing short-term fluctuations and nightly averages.

Significance. If the inversion reliably recovers unique vertical profiles, MTM would offer a portable, low-cost complement to existing profilers for site characterization and AO system design. The MCMC uncertainty quantification and simulation tests under realistic noise are methodological strengths. However, the on-sky component primarily validates integrated seeing rather than layer heights, limiting immediate impact for the profiling claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [On-sky observations and results] The on-sky validation (three nights at Daocheng) compares only the integrated seeing (integral of Cn²) to DIMM; no independent Cn²(z) profile measurements from MASS, SLODAR, or balloon sondes are reported. This leaves the recovered vertical distribution unverified on real data and weakens support for the central profiling claim.
  2. [Numerical simulations] Simulations recover the input HV profile, but the forward operator is constructed from the same HV model and fixed 13-node grid. No tests are shown for recovery of profiles with layers offset from the nodes, different layer counts, or non-HV distributions, raising questions about uniqueness under realistic misalignment.
  3. [Inversion method and MCMC pipeline] The MCMC inversion uses a fixed set of thirteen height nodes without reported sensitivity tests to node number, spacing, or priors. This discretization choice is load-bearing for the uniqueness of Cn²(z) solutions and could absorb centroiding noise into biased layer strengths while still matching the integral.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions and axis labels in the seeing comparison plots should explicitly state the time resolution and any data exclusion criteria to improve reproducibility.
  2. [Numerical simulations] The HV model parameters used to generate the simulation inputs should be tabulated for direct comparison with the recovered profiles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review of our manuscript on the Multistar Turbulence Monitor (MTM). We appreciate the positive assessment of the MCMC uncertainty quantification and simulation framework. Below we respond point-by-point to the major comments. Where appropriate, we indicate revisions that will be incorporated in the next version of the manuscript to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The on-sky validation (three nights at Daocheng) compares only the integrated seeing (integral of Cn²) to DIMM; no independent Cn²(z) profile measurements from MASS, SLODAR, or balloon sondes are reported. This leaves the recovered vertical distribution unverified on real data and weakens support for the central profiling claim.

    Authors: We agree that the on-sky component validates the integrated seeing against simultaneous DIMM measurements but does not include independent Cn²(z) profile comparisons from other instruments. No such data were acquired during the Daocheng campaign. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit discussion of this limitation, clarify that the on-sky results confirm the integrated turbulence strength, and note that the vertical profiling capability rests on the simulation results. We will also outline plans for future coordinated observations with MASS or SLODAR to provide direct profile validation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Simulations recover the input HV profile, but the forward operator is constructed from the same HV model and fixed 13-node grid. No tests are shown for recovery of profiles with layers offset from the nodes, different layer counts, or non-HV distributions, raising questions about uniqueness under realistic misalignment.

    Authors: We acknowledge that additional robustness tests are needed. In the revised manuscript we will include new simulation results demonstrating recovery for (i) layers deliberately offset from the 13-node grid, (ii) different total layer counts, and (iii) non-HV profiles such as single-layer and multi-layer cases with varying strengths. These tests will quantify the method’s performance under realistic misalignment and support the uniqueness of the recovered solutions within the noise model. revision: yes

  3. Referee: The MCMC inversion uses a fixed set of thirteen height nodes without reported sensitivity tests to node number, spacing, or priors. This discretization choice is load-bearing for the uniqueness of Cn²(z) solutions and could absorb centroiding noise into biased layer strengths while still matching the integral.

    Authors: We will expand the methods and results sections to report sensitivity tests varying the number of nodes (e.g., 7, 13, and 20), node spacing, and prior choices. These analyses will show that the 13-node discretization yields stable, unique solutions consistent with the input profiles and that the reported MCMC uncertainties appropriately reflect potential biases from noise absorption. The revised text will include the corresponding figures and quantitative metrics. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent on-sky Cn²(z) profile measurements from MASS, SLODAR, or balloon sondes are unavailable for the Daocheng observations, so direct real-data verification of the vertical distribution cannot be provided.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation and validation are self-contained

full rationale

The paper derives a forward operator from standard turbulence theory relating differential image motion between stellar pairs to a discrete Cn2(z) profile, then applies MCMC inversion with 13 fixed height nodes to recover the profile and its integral (seeing). Simulations inject a standard HV model plus realistic noise and pixel-scale variations into this operator and recover the input profile, which is ordinary numerical validation of an inversion algorithm rather than a reduction by construction. On-sky results compare only the integrated seeing value against an independent DIMM instrument; no profile is claimed to be validated on-sky and no self-citation or ansatz is invoked as load-bearing. The method therefore does not reduce any claimed result to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard turbulence theory and a common model; limited information from abstract prevents exhaustive listing.

free parameters (1)
  • thirteen discrete height nodes
    Discretization parameter in the MCMC inversion for the Cn2(z) profile
axioms (2)
  • standard math Differential image motion between stellar pairs is directly related to the refractive-index structure constant Cn2(z) via established theory
    Core inference step invoked in the method description
  • domain assumption The standard HV turbulence model is representative of conditions for testing recovery
    Used as the basis for numerical simulations

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5503 in / 1343 out tokens · 46297 ms · 2026-05-08T05:00:14.555262+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Measuring Atmospheric Turbulence with a Lunar Scintillometer Array. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/427046 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/427046

  2. [2]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Griffiths, R and Bardou, L and Butterley, T and Osborn, J and Wilson, R and Bustos, E and Tokovinin, A and Le Louarn, M and Otarola, A , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae434 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae434 2024

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    SExtractor: Software for source extraction. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1996164

  4. [4]

    2007, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    Combined MASS-DIMM instruments for atmospheric turbulence studies. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12467.x , archivePrefix =. 0709.2081 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12467.x 2007

  5. [5]

    A Review of Daytime Atmospheric Optical Turbulence Profile Detection Technology , journal =

    Deng Jian and Song Teng-fei and Liu Yu , keywords =. A Review of Daytime Atmospheric Optical Turbulence Profile Detection Technology , journal =. 2023 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chinastron.2023.06.001 , url =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chinastron.2023.06.001 2023

  6. [6]

    Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy , year = 2006, editor =

    Ground-layer turbulence profiling using a lunar SHABAR. Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy , year = 2006, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.672640 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.672640 2006

  7. [7]

    Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III , year = 2010, editor =

    Seeing measurements with autonomous, short-baseline shadow band rangers. Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III , year = 2010, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.857643 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.857643 2010

  8. [8]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Zhou, Qing and Liu, Yu and Song, Tengfei and Sha, Feiyang and Liu, Qiang and Li, Haitang and Zhang, Xuefei and Huang, Weisen and Lu, Liyuan and Wang, Xinjian and Luo, Qiwang and Chen, Yangrui and Zhang, Huan , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2103 , url =

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf2103 2025

  9. [9]

    Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy , volume=

    Sciences with the 2.5-meter Wide Field Survey Telescope (WFST) , author=. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  10. [10]

    MUltiplexed Survey Telescope (MUST) Science White Paper I: Overview of Large-Scale Structure Cosmology in the Era of Stage-V Spectroscopic Surveys

    MUltiplexed Survey Telescope: Perspectives for Large-Scale Structure Cosmology in the Era of Stage-V Spectroscopic Survey , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07970 , year=

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  11. [11]

    Progress in Astronomy , keywords =

    Optical Observatory Site Selection in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: Lenghu as a Promising Site for the Future Development of Optical Astronomy in China. Progress in Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8349.2024.02.05 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8349.2024.02.05 2024

  12. [12]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Site testing campaign for the Large Optical/infrared Telescope of China: overview. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/6/80 , archivePrefix =. 2001.11378 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/6/80 2001

  13. [13]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Site-testing at Muztagh-ata site I: ground meteorology and sky brightness. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/6/86 , archivePrefix =. 2003.14079 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/6/86 2003

  14. [14]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    Site testing campaign for the Large Optical Telescope at the Ali site. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =. doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/6/84 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/20/6/84

  15. [15]

    The optical system of the proposed Chinese 12-m optical/infrared telescope , year=

    Su, Ding-qiang and Liang, Ming and Yuan, Xiangyan and Bai, Hua and Cui, Xiangqun , journal=. The optical system of the proposed Chinese 12-m optical/infrared telescope , year=

  16. [16]

    Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VII , year = 2018, editor =

    Introduction on Chinese 12m optical/infrared telescope (LOT). Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VII , year = 2018, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2313044 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2313044 2018

  17. [17]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year =

    Song, Teng-Fei and Liu, Yu and Wang, Jing-Xing and Zhang, Xue-Fei and Liu, Shun-Qing and Zhao, Ming-Yu and Li, Xiao-Bo and Cai, Zhan-Chuan and Song, Qi-Wu and Cao, Zi-Huang and Ruan, Yu , title =. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year =

  18. [18]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2020, volume =

    Daytime optical turbulence profiling with a profiler of the differential solar limb. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2020, volume =

    2020

  19. [19]

    Nature , year = 2021, volume =

    Lenghu on the Tibetan Plateau as an astronomical observing site. Nature , year = 2021, volume =

    2021

  20. [20]

    Thirty Meter Telescope site testing I: Overview , journal =

    Sch. Thirty Meter Telescope site testing I: Overview , journal =. 2009 , doi =

    2009

  21. [21]

    Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes V , year = 2014, editor =

    Overview and status of the Giant Magellan Telescope project. Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes V , year = 2014, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.2055282 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2055282 2014

  22. [22]

    Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III , year = 2010, editor =

    GMT overview. Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes III , year = 2010, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.857852 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.857852 2010

  23. [23]

    and others , title =

    Vernin, J. and others , title =. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , volume =. 2011 , doi =

    2011

  24. [24]

    Fried, D. L. , title =. Journal of the Optical Society of America , volume =. 1982 , doi =

    1982

  25. [25]

    Journal of the Optical Society of America (1917-1983) , keywords =

    Modulation Transfer Function Associated with Image Transmission through Turbulent Media. Journal of the Optical Society of America (1917-1983) , keywords =. doi:10.1364/JOSA.54.000052 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1364/josa.54.000052 1917

  26. [26]

    Valley, G. C. , title =. Applied Optics , volume =. 1980 , doi =

    1980

  27. [27]

    , title =

    Dierickx, P. , title =. Journal of Modern Optics , volume =. 1992 , doi =

    1992

  28. [28]

    V. I. Tatarskii , title =. 1961 , publisher =

    1961

  29. [29]

    D. L. Fried , title =. Journal of the Optical Society of America , volume =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    The ESO differential image motion monitor. , keywords =

  31. [31]

    , title =

    Tokovinin, A. , title =. 2002 , month =. doi:10.1086/342683 , url =

    work page doi:10.1086/342683 2002

  32. [32]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Hickson, Paul and Ma, Bin and Shang, Zhaohui and Xue, Suijian , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  33. [33]

    and Hubin, N

    Le Louarn, M. and Hubin, N. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  34. [34]

    Optical and Infrared Interferometry , year = 2008, editor =

    LuSci: a lunar scintillometer to study ground layer turbulence. Optical and Infrared Interferometry , year = 2008, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.789042 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.789042 2008

  35. [35]

    Beckers, J. M. , year =. Adaptive optics for astronomy: Principles, performance, and applications , journal =

  36. [36]

    , year =

    Rigaut, F. , year =. Ground-layer adaptive optics for 8-m class telescopes: Performance, limitations, and prospects , journal =

  37. [37]

    Very Large Telescopes and their Instrumentation, Volume 2 , year = 1988, editor =

    Increasing the Size of the Isoplanatic Patch with Multiconjugate Adaptive Optics. Very Large Telescopes and their Instrumentation, Volume 2 , year = 1988, editor =

    1988

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Focusing on a Turbulent Layer: Principle of the ``Generalized SCIDAR''. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/316109 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1086/316109

  39. [39]

    , keywords =

    Profiling of atmospheric turbulence strength and velocity using a generalised SCIDAR technique. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/aas:1998217 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1051/aas:1998217

  40. [40]

    Adaptive Optical System Technologies II , year = 2003, editor =

    MASS: a monitor of the vertical turbulence distribution. Adaptive Optical System Technologies II , year = 2003, editor =. doi:10.1117/12.457982 , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1117/12.457982 2003

  41. [41]

    Meteorologische Rundschau , keywords =

    A new monostatic Doppler-SODAR system - Principle of measurement and comparison with direct measurements. Meteorologische Rundschau , keywords =

  42. [42]

    L., Crittenden, R., Melchiorri, A., Hobson, M

    SLODAR: measuring optical turbulence altitude with a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. , keywords =. doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05847.x , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05847.x 2002

  43. [43]

    Progess in Optics , keywords =

    The effects of atmospheric turbulence in optical astronomy. Progess in Optics , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0079-6638(08)70204-X , adsurl =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0079-6638(08)70204-x

  44. [44]

    and Roddier, F

    Vernin, J. and Roddier, F. , year =. Experimental determination of two-dimensional spectral density of atmospheric turbulence for optical propagation , journal =

  45. [45]

    , author=

    Laser wind sensing: the effects of saturation of scintillation. , author=. Applied optics , year=

  46. [46]

    European Extremely Large Telescope Site Characterization. II. High Angular Resolution Parameters , journal =. 2012 , volume =

    2012

  47. [47]

    Exceptional astronomical seeing conditions above Dome C in Antarctica , volume =

    Lawrence, Jon and Ashley, Michael and Tokovinin, Andrei and Travouillon, Tony , year =. Exceptional astronomical seeing conditions above Dome C in Antarctica , volume =. Nature , pages =

  48. [48]

    Defense, Security, and Sensing , year=

    Folding-up of the vertical atmospheric turbulence profile using an optical technique of movable observing plane , author=. Defense, Security, and Sensing , year=

  49. [49]

    and Lombardi, G

    Masciadri, E. and Lombardi, G. and Lascaux, F. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2014 , doi =

    2014

  50. [50]

    Bufton and Peter O

    Jack L. Bufton and Peter O. Minott and Michael W. Fitzmaurice and Paul J. Titterton , journal =. Measurements of Turbulence Profiles in the Troposphere , volume =. 1972 , doi =

    1972

  51. [51]

    Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , year=

    Measurement and analysis of atmospheric optical turbulence in Lhasa based on thermosonde , author=. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics , year=

  52. [52]

    and Ziad, A

    Tokovinin, Andrei and Vernin, J. and Ziad, A. and Chun, M. , year =. Optical turbulence profiles at Mauna Kea measured by MASS and SCIDAR , pages =. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , doi =

  53. [53]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year=

    Stereo-SCIDAR: optical turbulence profiling with high sensitivity using a modified SCIDAR instrument , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year=

  54. [54]

    and Wilson, R

    Butterley, T. and Wilson, R. W. and Sarazin, M. , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2006 , doi =

    2006

  55. [55]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Osborn, James and Wilson, Richard and Butterley, Timothy and Shepherd, Harry and Sarazin, Marc , title =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2010 , doi =

    2010

  56. [56]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , year = 1987, volume =

    Image motion as a measure of seeing quality. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , year = 1987, volume =

    1987

  57. [57]

    Comparison of evaluation methods for the Differential Image Motion Monitor , author=

    Seeing measurements using the solar limb – I. Comparison of evaluation methods for the Differential Image Motion Monitor , author=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year=

  58. [58]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , year = 2015, volume =

    Solar Ground-Layer Adaptive Optics. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , year = 2015, volume =

    2015

  59. [59]

    Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , year = 2016, volume =

    Advanced Multiple Aperture Seeing Profiler. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , year = 2016, volume =

    2016

  60. [60]

    PML: a generalized monitor of atmospheric turbulence profile with high vertical resolution , volume =

    Julien Chab\'. PML: a generalized monitor of atmospheric turbulence profile with high vertical resolution , volume =. Applied Optics , pages =. 2020 , doi =

    2020

  61. [61]

    and Liu, Yu and Elmhamdi, Abouazza and Kordi, Ayman and Mingyu, Zhao and Zhang, X

    Song, Tengfei and Wen, Y. and Liu, Yu and Elmhamdi, Abouazza and Kordi, Ayman and Mingyu, Zhao and Zhang, X. and Li, X. and Wang, J. and Fu, Y. and Cheng, Xiangming and Xu, F. , year =. Automatic Solar Seeing Observations at Mt. Wumingshan in Western China , volume =. Solar Physics , doi =

  62. [62]

    , author=

    Improved detection of atmospheric turbulence with SLODAR. , author=. Optics express , year=

  63. [63]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913791

    S-DIMM+ height characterization of day-time seeing using solar granulation , journal =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913791

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913791

  64. [64]

    Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year=

    Multi-aperture seeing profiler with multiple guide stars , author=. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics , year=

  65. [65]

    Acta Astronomica Sinica , year = 2019, volume =

    Numerical Simulation Research of Advanced Multiple Aperture Seeing Profiler. Acta Astronomica Sinica , year = 2019, volume =

    2019

  66. [66]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2006, volume =

    Single star scidar: atmospheric parameters profiling using the simulated annealing algorithm. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , year = 2006, volume =

    2006

  67. [67]

    Ziad and C

    A. Ziad and C. Giordano and A. Aresta and C. Aristidi and C. Bailet and C. Bertolin and M. Carbillet and others , title =. Adaptive Optics Systems IX , publisher =. 2024 , doi =

    2024

  68. [68]

    Chinese Science Bulletin , year=

    Optical turbulence profiling with single star SCIDAR technique , author=. Chinese Science Bulletin , year=

  69. [69]

    2007, MNRAS, 378, 910, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x

    Accurate seeing measurements with MASS and DIMM. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12307.x , archivePrefix =. 0708.0195 , primaryClass =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12307.x 2007