pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06501 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CL

Recognition: unknown

Cubit: Token Mixer with Kernel Ridge Regression

Anderson Schneider, Chuanyang Zheng, Jiankai Sun, Liangchen Tan, Mac Schwager, XiaoDong Liu, Yihang Gao, Yuehao Wang, Yuriy Nevmyvaka

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 12:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CL
keywords kernel ridge regressiontoken mixertransformer attentionlong sequence modelingNadaraya-Watson regressiondeep learning architecturestoken mixing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cubit replaces the Transformer's attention with kernel ridge regression to improve long-sequence modeling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reinterprets standard attention as a form of Nadaraya-Watson regression that computes similarities between tokens and aggregates values. It introduces Cubit, which instead applies the closed-form solution of kernel ridge regression for token mixing, combining kernel-based aggregation with normalization by the inverse kernel matrix. Limited-Range Rescale is added to keep training stable. Experiments indicate Cubit outperforms the Transformer on long sequences and that the advantage widens as sequence length grows. A reader would care because the result points to a regression-based alternative that may handle extended contexts more reliably than current attention layers.

Core claim

The central claim is that the attention module in Transformers performs Nadaraya-Watson regression, and substituting the closed-form kernel ridge regression solution produces a token-mixing architecture with stronger mathematical grounding and better long-sequence capability than the vanilla Transformer.

What carries the argument

The kernel ridge regression token mixer, which aggregates values via kernel similarities and normalizes by the inverse of the kernel matrix, made trainable through Limited-Range Rescale.

If this is right

  • Cubit exhibits stronger long-sequence modeling capability than the vanilla Transformer.
  • The performance gain of Cubit over the Transformer increases as training sequence length grows.
  • Kernel ridge regression supplies a stronger mathematical foundation for token mixing than Nadaraya-Watson regression.
  • Limited-Range Rescale enables stable training when the closed-form kernel ridge regression solution is used inside deep layers.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the kernel ridge regression mixer scales to other modalities, similar replacements could be tried in vision transformers or multimodal models.
  • Varying the kernel choice inside Cubit might produce further gains on particular data distributions or length regimes.
  • The regression view could be used to derive new theoretical bounds on sequence model capacity based on properties of the kernel matrix.
  • One could compare Cubit and Transformer at matched compute budgets on progressively longer inputs to isolate the effect of the regression change.

Load-bearing premise

The closed-form kernel ridge regression solution can be stably inserted into a deep network via Limited-Range Rescale, and observed gains come from the regression formulation itself rather than hyperparameter or implementation differences.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment in which Cubit shows no widening performance gap over the Transformer as sequence lengths are increased from short to very long, or in which training collapses without Limited-Range Rescale even when other factors are matched.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06501 by Anderson Schneider, Chuanyang Zheng, Jiankai Sun, Liangchen Tan, Mac Schwager, XiaoDong Liu, Yihang Gao, Yuehao Wang, Yuriy Nevmyvaka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The performance of different methods on the Arxiv and Books3 dataset, with model view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The performance of different methods on the FineWeb dataset, with model parameter view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The performance of long training length on the FineWeb dataset, with model parameter view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The performance of larger model size on the FineWeb dataset. view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The performance of the share key embedding and no Limited-Range Rescale, with model view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The performance of long training length on the FineWeb dataset, with model parameter view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Since its introduction in 2017, the Transformer has become one of the most widely adopted architectures in modern deep learning. Despite extensive efforts to improve positional encoding, attention mechanisms, and feed-forward networks, the core token-mixing mechanism in Transformers remains attention. In this work, we show that the attention module in Transformers can be interpreted as performing Nadaraya-Watson regression, where it computes similarities between tokens and aggregates the corresponding values accordingly. Motivated by this perspective, we propose Cubit, a potential next-generation architecture that leverages Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR), while the vanilla Transformer relies on Nadaraya-Watson regression. Specifically, Cubit modifies the classical attention computation by incorporating the closed-form solution of KRR, combining value aggregation through kernel similarities with normalization via the inverse of the kernel matrix. To improve the training stability, we further propose the Limited-Range Rescale (LRR), which rescales the value layer within a controlled range. We argue that Cubit, as a KRR-based architecture, provides a stronger mathematical foundation than the vanilla Transformer, whose attention mechanism corresponds to Nadaraya-Watson regression. We validate this claim through comprehensive experiments. The experimental results suggest that Cubit may exhibit stronger long-sequence modeling capability. In particular, its performance gain over the Transformer appears to increase as the training sequence length grows.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reinterprets Transformer attention as Nadaraya-Watson regression and proposes Cubit, a token-mixing architecture that replaces it with the closed-form solution of Kernel Ridge Regression (kernel similarities plus inverse kernel-matrix normalization). It introduces Limited-Range Rescale (LRR) to stabilize training and claims that Cubit supplies a stronger mathematical foundation than the vanilla Transformer while exhibiting superior long-sequence modeling, with performance gains over the Transformer increasing as training sequence length grows.

Significance. If the reported gains are shown to arise specifically from the KRR formulation rather than from LRR or hyperparameter differences, the work would supply a concrete, regression-based alternative to attention with potential implications for long-context modeling. The interpretive link between attention and Nadaraya-Watson is already known in the literature; the value would lie in a controlled demonstration that the closed-form KRR solution yields measurable, length-dependent advantages.

major comments (3)
  1. [Experiments] The manuscript provides no control experiment in which a standard Transformer attention block is augmented only with Limited-Range Rescale (LRR) while retaining Nadaraya-Watson regression. Without this ablation, the attribution of the observed long-sequence gains to the KRR closed-form solution (rather than to LRR or implementation choices) remains unsecured; this directly affects the central claim that Cubit possesses a stronger mathematical foundation.
  2. [Method] No explicit forward-pass equations or stability analysis are supplied for the inverse kernel matrix that appears in the KRR update. In particular, it is unclear how the matrix inversion is computed at each layer, what regularization schedule is used for the free KRR parameter, and whether the Limited-Range Rescale is applied before or after the inversion; these details are load-bearing for reproducibility and for the claim of improved training stability.
  3. [Experiments] The abstract states that performance gains increase with training sequence length, yet the experimental section does not report the precise sequence lengths tested, the number of runs, or statistical significance of the trend. This weakens the empirical support for the long-sequence modeling claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Method] The notation distinguishing kernel similarities, value aggregation, and the inverse-kernel normalization step could be presented with numbered equations to facilitate direct comparison with the Nadaraya-Watson baseline.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Experiments] The manuscript provides no control experiment in which a standard Transformer attention block is augmented only with Limited-Range Rescale (LRR) while retaining Nadaraya-Watson regression. Without this ablation, the attribution of the observed long-sequence gains to the KRR closed-form solution (rather than to LRR or implementation choices) remains unsecured; this directly affects the central claim that Cubit possesses a stronger mathematical foundation.

    Authors: We agree that a dedicated ablation isolating LRR on the standard Transformer (retaining Nadaraya-Watson regression) would provide clearer attribution of the long-sequence gains to the KRR formulation. In the revised manuscript we will add this control experiment, comparing the vanilla Transformer, Transformer+LRR, and Cubit across the same sequence lengths. This will allow readers to assess whether the performance trend is driven primarily by the closed-form KRR solution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method] No explicit forward-pass equations or stability analysis are supplied for the inverse kernel matrix that appears in the KRR update. In particular, it is unclear how the matrix inversion is computed at each layer, what regularization schedule is used for the free KRR parameter, and whether the Limited-Range Rescale is applied before or after the inversion; these details are load-bearing for reproducibility and for the claim of improved training stability.

    Authors: We will insert the complete forward-pass equations for the KRR token mixer, explicitly showing the kernel matrix construction, the regularization term, the inversion step (including any numerical stabilization such as adding a small diagonal), and the exact ordering of Limited-Range Rescale relative to the inversion. A short stability analysis discussing conditioning of the kernel matrix and the effect of the regularization schedule will also be added to the method section. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Experiments] The abstract states that performance gains increase with training sequence length, yet the experimental section does not report the precise sequence lengths tested, the number of runs, or statistical significance of the trend. This weakens the empirical support for the long-sequence modeling claim.

    Authors: We will revise the experimental section to list the exact training sequence lengths evaluated, state the number of independent runs performed for each configuration, and report statistical significance (e.g., standard deviation across runs and p-values or confidence intervals) for the observed trend of increasing gains with sequence length. These details will be added both in the main text and in the corresponding tables or figures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents an interpretive mapping of Transformer attention to Nadaraya-Watson regression as motivation, then introduces a new Cubit architecture based on the closed-form KRR solution plus a stabilizing Limited-Range Rescale operator. No step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own inputs by construction. The 'stronger mathematical foundation' statement is an explicit argument comparing regression formulations rather than a derived equality. Experiments are reported as empirical validation, not as forced outputs from fitted parameters. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The chain remains independent of the target claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The paper rests on the domain assumption that attention equals Nadaraya-Watson regression and introduces an ad-hoc stabilization method; KRR regularization is an unstated free parameter.

free parameters (1)
  • KRR regularization parameter
    Kernel Ridge Regression requires a regularization hyperparameter that must be chosen or tuned for the architecture to function.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Attention in Transformers performs Nadaraya-Watson regression.
    This equivalence is used to motivate replacing attention with KRR.
invented entities (1)
  • Limited-Range Rescale (LRR) no independent evidence
    purpose: Rescales the value layer within a controlled range to improve training stability.
    Proposed specifically to make the KRR formulation trainable.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5564 in / 1360 out tokens · 54472 ms · 2026-05-08T12:34:11.565589+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · 11 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Gqa: Training generalized multi-query transformer models from multi-head checkpoints

    Joshua Ainslie, James Lee-Thorp, Michiel De Jong, Yury Zemlyanskiy, Federico Lebrón, and Sumit Sanghai. Gqa: Training generalized multi-query transformer models from multi-head checkpoints. InProceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 4895–4901, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translate

    Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate.arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473, 2014

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    Effect of dimensionality on convergence rates of kernel ridge regression estimator.Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 236:106228, 2025

    Kwan-Young Bak and Woojoo Lee. Effect of dimensionality on convergence rates of kernel ridge regression estimator.Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 236:106228, 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Overfitting regimes of nadaraya-watson interpolators.arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2502, 2025

    Daniel Barzilai, Guy Kornowski, and Ohad Shamir. Overfitting regimes of nadaraya-watson interpolators.arXiv e-prints, pages arXiv–2502, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    xlstm: Extended long short-term memory.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:107547–107603, 2024

    Maximilian Beck, Korbinian Pöppel, Markus Spanring, Andreas Auer, Oleksandra Prudnikova, Michael Kopp, Günter Klambauer, Johannes Brandstetter, and Sepp Hochreiter. xlstm: Extended long short-term memory.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:107547–107603, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    Sage, 2004

    Richard A Berk.Regression analysis: A constructive critique, volume 11. Sage, 2004

    2004

  7. [7]

    Piqa: Reasoning about phys- ical commonsense in natural language

    Yonatan Bisk, Rowan Zellers, Jianfeng Gao, Yejin Choi, et al. Piqa: Reasoning about phys- ical commonsense in natural language. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, volume 34, pages 7432–7439, 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Language models are few-shot learners.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020

    Tom Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared D Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, et al. Language models are few-shot learners.Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1877–1901, 2020. 12

    1901

  9. [9]

    Local linear regression estimator on the boundary correction in nonparametric regression estimation.Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 19(3):460– 471, 2020

    Langat Reuben Cheruiyot. Local linear regression estimator on the boundary correction in nonparametric regression estimation.Journal of Statistical Theory and Applications, 19(3):460– 471, 2020

    2020

  10. [10]

    Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge

    Peter Clark, Isaac Cowhey, Oren Etzioni, Tushar Khot, Ashish Sabharwal, Carissa Schoenick, and Oyvind Tafjord. Think you have solved question answering? try arc, the ai2 reasoning challenge.arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.05457, 2018

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Lowess: A program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression.The American Statistician, 35(1):54, 1981

    William S Cleveland. Lowess: A program for smoothing scatterplots by robust locally weighted regression.The American Statistician, 35(1):54, 1981

    1981

  12. [12]

    Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting.Journal of the American statistical association, 83(403):596–610, 1988

    William S Cleveland and Susan J Devlin. Locally weighted regression: an approach to regression analysis by local fitting.Journal of the American statistical association, 83(403):596–610, 1988

    1988

  13. [13]

    Smoothing by local regression: Principles and methods

    William S Cleveland and Catherine Loader. Smoothing by local regression: Principles and methods. InStatistical theory and computational aspects of smoothing: Proceedings of the COMPSTAT’94 Satellite Meeting held in Semmering, Austria, 27–28 August 1994, pages 10–49. Springer, 2013

    1994

  14. [14]

    Xu, Huazuo Gao, Deli Chen, Jiashi Li, Wangding Zeng, Xingkai Yu, Y

    Damai Dai, Chengqi Deng, Chenggang Zhao, R.x. Xu, Huazuo Gao, Deli Chen, Jiashi Li, Wangding Zeng, Xingkai Yu, Y. Wu, Zhenda Xie, Y.k. Li, Panpan Huang, Fuli Luo, Chong Ruan, Zhifang Sui, and Wenfeng Liang. DeepSeekMoE: Towards ultimate expert specialization in mixture-of-experts language models. In Lun-Wei Ku, Andre Martins, and Vivek Srikumar, editors,P...

    2024

  15. [15]

    Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Duality

    Tri Dao and Albert Gu. Transformers are ssms: Generalized models and efficient algorithms through structured state space duality.arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.21060, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Cogview: Mastering text-to-image generation via transformers.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:19822–19835, 2021

    Ming Ding, Zhuoyi Yang, Wenyi Hong, Wendi Zheng, Chang Zhou, Da Yin, Junyang Lin, Xu Zou, Zhou Shao, Hongxia Yang, et al. Cogview: Mastering text-to-image generation via transformers.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:19822–19835, 2021

    2021

  17. [17]

    Finding structure in time.Cognitive science, 14(2):179–211, 1990

    Jeffrey L Elman. Finding structure in time.Cognitive science, 14(2):179–211, 1990

    1990

  18. [18]

    Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure.Machine learning, 7(2):195–225, 1991

    Jeffrey L Elman. Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure.Machine learning, 7(2):195–225, 1991

    1991

  19. [19]

    Semiparametric estimates of the relation between weather and electricity sales.Journal of the American statistical Association, 81(394):310–320, 1986

    Robert F Engle, Clive WJ Granger, John Rice, and Andrew Weiss. Semiparametric estimates of the relation between weather and electricity sales.Journal of the American statistical Association, 81(394):310–320, 1986

    1986

  20. [20]

    Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(120):1–39, 2022

    William Fedus, Barret Zoph, and Noam Shazeer. Switch transformers: Scaling to trillion parameter models with simple and efficient sparsity.Journal of Machine Learning Research, 23(120):1–39, 2022

    2022

  21. [21]

    USAF school of Aviation Medicine, 1985

    Evelyn Fix.Discriminatory analysis: nonparametric discrimination, consistency properties, volume 1. USAF school of Aviation Medicine, 1985

    1985

  22. [22]

    cambridge university press, 2009

    David A Freedman.Statistical models: theory and practice. cambridge university press, 2009. 13

    2009

  23. [23]

    The language model evaluation harness, 07 2024

    Leo Gao, Jonathan Tow, Baber Abbasi, Stella Biderman, Sid Black, Anthony DiPofi, Charles Foster, Laurence Golding, Jeffrey Hsu, Alain Le Noac’h, Haonan Li, Kyle McDonell, Niklas Muennighoff, Chris Ociepa, Jason Phang, Laria Reynolds, Hailey Schoelkopf, Aviya Skowron, Lintang Sutawika, Eric Tang, Anish Thite, Ben Wang, Kevin Wang, and Andy Zou. The languag...

    2024

  24. [24]

    Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories

    Mor Geva, Roei Schuster, Jonathan Berant, and Omer Levy. Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories. InProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5484–5495, 2021

    2021

  25. [25]

    Long short-term memory.Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks, pages 37–45, 2012

    Alex Graves. Long short-term memory.Supervised sequence labelling with recurrent neural networks, pages 37–45, 2012

    2012

  26. [26]

    Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces

    Albert Gu and Tri Dao. Mamba: Linear-time sequence modeling with selective state spaces. In First conference on language modeling, 2024

    2024

  27. [27]

    On the parameterization and initialization of diagonal state space models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:35971–35983, 2022

    Albert Gu, Karan Goel, Ankit Gupta, and Christopher Ré. On the parameterization and initialization of diagonal state space models.Advances in neural information processing systems, 35:35971–35983, 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    Efficiently Modeling Long Sequences with Structured State Spaces

    Albert Gu, Karan Goel, and Christopher Ré. Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00396, 2021

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    Local kernel ridge regression for scalable, interpolating, continuous regression

    Mingxuan Han, Chenglong Ye, and Jeff Phillips. Local kernel ridge regression for scalable, interpolating, continuous regression. 2022

    2022

  30. [30]

    Deep residual learning for image recognition

    Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 770–778, 2016

    2016

  31. [31]

    Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 79(8):2554–2558, 1982

    John J Hopfield. Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities.Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 79(8):2554–2558, 1982

    1982

  32. [32]

    Consistency of local linear regression estimator for mixtures with varying concentrations.Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications, 11(3):359–372, 2024

    Daniel Horbunov and Rostyslav Maiboroda. Consistency of local linear regression estimator for mixtures with varying concentrations.Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications, 11(3):359–372, 2024

    2024

  33. [33]

    Densely connected convolutional networks

    Gao Huang, Zhuang Liu, Laurens Van Der Maaten, and Kilian Q Weinberger. Densely connected convolutional networks. InProceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 4700–4708, 2017

    2017

  34. [34]

    Adaptive mixtures of local experts.Neural computation, 3(1):79–87, 1991

    Robert A Jacobs, Michael I Jordan, Steven J Nowlan, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Adaptive mixtures of local experts.Neural computation, 3(1):79–87, 1991

    1991

  35. [35]

    Mixtral of Experts

    Albert Q Jiang, Alexandre Sablayrolles, Antoine Roux, Arthur Mensch, Blanche Savary, Chris Bamford, Devendra Singh Chaplot, Diego de las Casas, Emma Bou Hanna, Florian Bressand, et al. Mixtral of experts.arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.04088, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Improvement of boundary bias in nonparametric regression via twicing technique

    Jae-Keun Jo. Improvement of boundary bias in nonparametric regression via twicing technique. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 4(2):445–452, 1997. 14

    1997

  37. [37]

    Serial order: A parallel distributed processing approach

    Michael I Jordan. Serial order: A parallel distributed processing approach. 1986

    1986

  38. [38]

    Finetuning pretrained transformers into rnns

    Jungo Kasai, Hao Peng, Yizhe Zhang, Dani Yogatama, Gabriel Ilharco, Nikolaos Pappas, Yi Mao, Weizhu Chen, and Noah A Smith. Finetuning pretrained transformers into rnns. In Proceedings of the 2021 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 10630–10643, 2021

    2021

  39. [39]

    Multiplicative lstm for sequence modelling.arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07959, 2016

    Ben Krause, Liang Lu, Iain Murray, and Steve Renals. Multiplicative lstm for sequence modelling.arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.07959, 2016

    work page arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Race: Large-scale reading comprehension dataset from examinations

    Guokun Lai, Qizhe Xie, Hanxiao Liu, Yiming Yang, and Eduard Hovy. Race: Large-scale reading comprehension dataset from examinations. InProceedings of the 2017 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, pages 785–794, 2017

    2017

  41. [41]

    Virtual width networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.11238, 2025

    Baisheng Li, Banggu Wu, Bole Ma, Bowen Xiao, Chaoyi Zhang, Cheng Li, Chengyi Wang, Chengyin Xu, Chi Zhang, Chong Hu, et al. Virtual width networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.11238, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Video-LLaVA: Learning united visual representation by alignment before projection

    Bin Lin, Yang Ye, Bin Zhu, Jiaxi Cui, Munan Ning, Peng Jin, and Li Yuan. Video-LLaVA: Learning united visual representation by alignment before projection. In Yaser Al-Onaizan, Mohit Bansal, and Yun-Nung Chen, editors,Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 5971–5984, Miami, Florida, USA, November

    2024

  43. [43]

    Association for Computational Linguistics

  44. [44]

    DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report

    Aixin Liu, Bei Feng, Bing Xue, Bingxuan Wang, Bochao Wu, Chengda Lu, Chenggang Zhao, Chengqi Deng, Chenyu Zhang, Chong Ruan, et al. Deepseek-v3 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.19437, 2024

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    Optimal rates and saturation for noiseless kernel ridge regression.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15718, 2024

    Jihao Long, Xiaojun Peng, and Lei Wu. Optimal rates and saturation for noiseless kernel ridge regression.arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15718, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Fineweb-edu: the finest collection of educational content, 2024

    Anton Lozhkov, Loubna Ben Allal, Leandro von Werra, and Thomas Wolf. Fineweb-edu: the finest collection of educational content, 2024

    2024

  47. [47]

    Megalodon: Efficient llm pretraining and inference with unlimited context length.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:71831–71854, 2024

    Xuezhe Ma, Xiaomeng Yang, Wenhan Xiong, Beidi Chen, Lili Yu, Hao Zhang, Jonathan May, Luke Zettlemoyer, Omer Levy, and Chunting Zhou. Megalodon: Efficient llm pretraining and inference with unlimited context length.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 37:71831–71854, 2024

    2024

  48. [48]

    the smoothing of time series

    Frederick R Macaulay. Introduction to" the smoothing of time series". InThe Smoothing of Time Series, pages 17–30. NBER, 1931

    1931

  49. [49]

    Parallelizing spectrally regularized kernel algorithms

    Nicole MÞcke and Gilles Blanchard. Parallelizing spectrally regularized kernel algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 19(30):1–29, 2018

    2018

  50. [50]

    The llama 4 herd: The beginning of a new era of natively multimodal ai innovation

    AI Meta. The llama 4 herd: The beginning of a new era of natively multimodal ai innovation. https://ai.meta.com/blog/llama-4-multimodal-intelligence/. Accessed: 4-7-2025

    2025

  51. [51]

    Regularized least squares learning with heavy-tailed noise is minimax optimal.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14214, 2025

    Mattes Mollenhauer, Nicole MÞcke, Dimitri Meunier, and Arthur Gretton. Regularized least squares learning with heavy-tailed noise is minimax optimal.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.14214, 2025. 15

    work page arXiv 2025

  52. [52]

    MIT press, 2012

    Kevin P Murphy.Machine learning: a probabilistic perspective. MIT press, 2012

    2012

  53. [53]

    Wf sheppard’s smoothing method: A precursor to local polynomial regression.International Statistical Review, 87(3):604–612, 2019

    Lori Murray and David Bellhouse. Wf sheppard’s smoothing method: A precursor to local polynomial regression.International Statistical Review, 87(3):604–612, 2019

    2019

  54. [54]

    On estimating regression.Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 9(1):141–142, 1964

    Elizbar A Nadaraya. On estimating regression.Theory of Probability & Its Applications, 9(1):141–142, 1964

    1964

  55. [55]

    Generalized linear models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 135(3):370–384, 1972

    John Ashworth Nelder and Robert WM Wedderburn. Generalized linear models.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 135(3):370–384, 1972

    1972

  56. [56]

    Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, James Bradbury, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, et al. Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library.Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019

    2019

  57. [57]

    The fineweb datasets: Decanting the web for the finest text data at scale

    Guilherme Penedo, Hynek Kydlíček, Loubna Ben allal, Anton Lozhkov, Margaret Mitchell, Colin Raffel, Leandro Von Werra, and Thomas Wolf. The fineweb datasets: Decanting the web for the finest text data at scale. InThe Thirty-eight Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems Datasets and Benchmarks Track, 2024

    2024

  58. [58]

    RWKV-7 “Goose” with expressive dynamic state evolution, 2025

    Bo Peng, Ruichong Zhang, Daniel Goldstein, Eric Alcaide, Xingjian Du, Haowen Hou, Jiaju Lin, Jiaxing Liu, Janna Lu, William Merrill, et al. Rwkv-7" goose" with expressive dynamic state evolution.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.14456, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  59. [59]

    Train short, test long: Attention with linear biases enables input length extrapolation

    Ofir Press, Noah Smith, and Mike Lewis. Train short, test long: Attention with linear biases enables input length extrapolation. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2022

    2022

  60. [60]

    From sparse to soft mixtures of experts

    Joan Puigcerver, Carlos Riquelme Ruiz, Basil Mustafa, and Neil Houlsby. From sparse to soft mixtures of experts. InThe Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, 2024

    2024

  61. [61]

    Hgrn2: Gated linear rnns with state expansion

    Zhen Qin, Songlin Yang, Weixuan Sun, Xuyang Shen, Dong Li, Weigao Sun, and Yiran Zhong. Hgrn2: Gated linear rnns with state expansion.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07904, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Gated Attention for Large Language Models: Non-linearity, Sparsity, and Attention-Sink-Free

    Zihan Qiu, Zekun Wang, Bo Zheng, Zeyu Huang, Kaiyue Wen, Songlin Yang, Rui Men, Le Yu, Fei Huang, Suozhi Huang, et al. Gated attention for large language models: Non-linearity, sparsity, and attention-sink-free.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.06708, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    Theory, analysis, and best practices for sigmoid self-attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04431,

    Jason Ramapuram, Federico Danieli, Eeshan Dhekane, Floris Weers, Dan Busbridge, Pierre Ablin, Tatiana Likhomanenko, Jagrit Digani, Zijin Gu, Amitis Shidani, et al. Theory, analysis, and best practices for sigmoid self-attention.arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.04431, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  64. [64]

    Decoder-hybrid-decoder architecture for efficient reasoning with long generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06607, 2025

    Liliang Ren, Congcong Chen, Haoran Xu, Young Jin Kim, Adam Atkinson, Zheng Zhan, Jiankai Sun, Baolin Peng, Liyuan Liu, Shuohang Wang, et al. Decoder-hybrid-decoder architecture for efficient reasoning with long generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.06607, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Scaling vision with sparse mixture of experts

    Carlos Riquelme, Joan Puigcerver, Basil Mustafa, Maxim Neumann, Rodolphe Jenatton, André Susano Pinto, Daniel Keysers, and Neil Houlsby. Scaling vision with sparse mixture of experts. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:8583–8595, 2021. 16

    2021

  66. [66]

    Hash layers for large sparse models

    Stephen Roller, Sainbayar Sukhbaatar, Jason Weston, et al. Hash layers for large sparse models. advances in neural information processing systems, 34:17555–17566, 2021

    2021

  67. [67]

    Winogrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale.Communications of the ACM, 64(9):99–106, 2021

    Keisuke Sakaguchi, Ronan Le Bras, Chandra Bhagavatula, and Yejin Choi. Winogrande: An adversarial winograd schema challenge at scale.Communications of the ACM, 64(9):99–106, 2021

    2021

  68. [68]

    Social iqa: Commonsense reasoning about social interactions

    Maarten Sap, Hannah Rashkin, Derek Chen, Ronan Le Bras, and Yejin Choi. Social iqa: Commonsense reasoning about social interactions. InProceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 4463–4473, 2019

    2019

  69. [69]

    Learning to control fast-weight memories: An alternative to dynamic recurrent networks.Neural Computation, 4(1):131–139, 1992

    Jürgen Schmidhuber. Learning to control fast-weight memories: An alternative to dynamic recurrent networks.Neural Computation, 4(1):131–139, 1992

    1992

  70. [70]

    Fast Transformer Decoding: One Write-Head is All You Need

    Noam Shazeer. Fast transformer decoding: One write-head is all you need.arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.02150, 2019

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1911

  71. [71]

    Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer

    Noam Shazeer, *Azalia Mirhoseini, *Krzysztof Maziarz, Andy Davis, Quoc Le, Geoffrey Hinton, and Jeff Dean. Outrageously large neural networks: The sparsely-gated mixture-of-experts layer. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2017

    2017

  72. [72]

    Jetmoe: Reaching llama2 performance with 0.1 m dollars.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07413, 2024

    Yikang Shen, Zhen Guo, Tianle Cai, and Zengyi Qin. Jetmoe: Reaching llama2 performance with 0.1 m dollars.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.07413, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Simplified state space layers for sequence modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04933, 2022

    Jimmy TH Smith, Andrew Warrington, and Scott W Linderman. Simplified state space layers for sequence modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04933, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  74. [74]

    Retentive Network: A Successor to Transformer for Large Language Models

    Yutao Sun, Li Dong, Shaohan Huang, Shuming Ma, Yuqing Xia, Jilong Xue, Jianyong Wang, and Furu Wei. Retentive network: A successor to transformer for large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.08621, 2023

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks.Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014

    Ilya Sutskever, Oriol Vinyals, and Quoc V Le. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks.Advances in neural information processing systems, 27, 2014

    2014

  76. [76]

    Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence

    Kimi Team, Yifan Bai, Yiping Bao, Guanduo Chen, Jiahao Chen, Ningxin Chen, Ruijue Chen, Yanru Chen, Yuankun Chen, Yutian Chen, et al. Kimi k2: Open agentic intelligence.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.20534, 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  77. [77]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.15031 (2026)

    Kimi Team, Guangyu Chen, Yu Zhang, Jianlin Su, Weixin Xu, Siyuan Pan, Yaoyu Wang, Yucheng Wang, Guanduo Chen, Bohong Yin, et al. Attention residuals.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.15031, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  78. [78]

    A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis.Indagationes mathematicae, 12(85):173, 1950

    Henri Theil. A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis.Indagationes mathematicae, 12(85):173, 1950

    1950

  79. [79]

    Logistic regression: relating patient characteristics to outcomes.Jama, 316(5):533–534, 2016

    Juliana Tolles and William J Meurer. Logistic regression: relating patient characteristics to outcomes.Jama, 316(5):533–534, 2016. 17

    2016

  80. [80]

    Mlp- mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:24261–24272, 2021

    Ilya O Tolstikhin, Neil Houlsby, Alexander Kolesnikov, Lucas Beyer, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Jessica Yung, Andreas Steiner, Daniel Keysers, Jakob Uszkoreit, et al. Mlp- mixer: An all-mlp architecture for vision.Advances in neural information processing systems, 34:24261–24272, 2021

    2021

Showing first 80 references.