arxiv: 2605.06780 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

A Semiclassical Diagnostic for Spacetime Emergence

Elliott Gesteau, Netta Engelhardt

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 00:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th

keywords semiclassical gravityquantum extremal surfacesholographic emergencegeneralized entropyspacetime emergenceobserver rulesevanescent surfacesbulk entanglement

0 comments

The pith

Evanescent quantum extremal surfaces diagnose when semiclassical spacetimes fail to emerge from holography

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper proposes a diagnostic for when a semiclassical spacetime cannot emerge from the usual rules of holography. The diagnostic rests on the presence of evanescent quantum extremal surfaces, which are set apart by an upper bound on their area even when their generalized entropy is large. The large entropy arises because the bulk entanglement contribution stays unconstrained, while the area term is limited by an operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity. A reader would care because the diagnostic clarifies the limits of standard holography in semiclassical regimes and indicates how observer-dependent rules might restore consistency in some cases.

Core claim

The presence of evanescent quantum extremal surfaces, distinguished by an upper bound on their area rather than on their generalized entropy, serves as a general semiclassical diagnostic for failures of spacetime emergence from traditional holographic rules. The generalized entropy of such a surface can remain large because its bulk entanglement term is unconstrained by the operational requirements that bound the area term, a feature explained by the distinction between classical and quantum connectivity in semiclassical gravity.

What carries the argument

Evanescent quantum extremal surfaces, which carry the diagnostic by exhibiting a strict upper bound on the area term while leaving the bulk entanglement term free due to the separation of classical and quantum connectivity.

If this is right

Traditional holographic rules fail to reproduce semiclassical spacetimes that contain evanescent quantum extremal surfaces.
Observer rules can partially or fully restore emergence for spacetimes diagnosed by these surfaces.
The area term of the generalized entropy is bounded while the bulk entanglement term is not, allowing large total entropy.
The diagnostic quantifies the extent to which observer rules are required to achieve consistency with holography.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The diagnostic could be applied to concrete models such as black hole interiors to check for emergence failures.
Similar connectivity distinctions might extend to other gravitational entropy measures beyond the generalized entropy.
Tightening or loosening the area bound on evanescent surfaces could provide a quantitative measure of how severely emergence is obstructed.

Load-bearing premise

The operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity in semiclassical gravity is well-defined and directly accounts for why the bulk entanglement term stays unconstrained on these surfaces.

What would settle it

An explicit semiclassical construction in which an evanescent quantum extremal surface has its bulk entanglement term forced small by the same connectivity rules that bound its area would falsify the diagnostic.

read the original abstract

Recent developments have shown that some semiclassical spacetimes cannot emerge from a traditional application of the rules of holography, prompting proposals for restoring their emergence with "observer rules". In this paper, we propose a general semiclassical diagnostic of such failures of emergence, and of the extent to which observer rules can fix them. Our diagnostic is the presence of certain "evanescent" quantum extremal surfaces, which are distinguished by an upper bound on their area rather than their generalized entropy. In particular, the generalized entropy of an evanescent QES may be large: even though its area term must be small, its bulk entanglement term is unconstrained. This feature is explained by an operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity in semiclassical gravity, or equivalently between the two summands of the generalized entropy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper frames evanescent QES via area bounds rather than full generalized entropy as a diagnostic for holographic emergence failures, but the classical-quantum connectivity split lacks a derivation from the semiclassical equations.

read the letter

The punchline is that this work proposes evanescent quantum extremal surfaces as a way to spot when semiclassical spacetimes fail to emerge from standard holography, with the surfaces marked by a strict upper bound on area even if their generalized entropy can grow large from the bulk term. It links this to an operational split between classical and quantum connectivity, which it says explains why the entanglement contribution stays free while the area stays small. This is positioned as a general diagnostic that could also clarify how observer rules might restore emergence in some cases. What is new is the specific emphasis on area bounds as the distinguishing feature for these surfaces, rather than extremizing the full generalized entropy as in prior QES literature. The paper does a clean job of connecting this idea to recent discussions on emergence failures and observer-dependent rules, giving a concrete surface-based handle on an otherwise abstract issue. It stays focused on the semiclassical regime and avoids overclaiming. The main soft spot is that the operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity is asserted as explanatory but not derived from the semiclassical Einstein equations, the QES extremization condition, or a controlled limit of the holographic dictionary. Without an explicit construction showing how the two summands of S_gen can decouple while preserving extremality, the diagnostic risks reading as a rephrasing of existing generalized entropy rather than an independent test. The abstract also gives no examples, explicit calculations, or checks against known cases, which makes it hard to gauge how sharp the criterion actually is. This is for people already working on quantum extremal surfaces, holographic entanglement, and models of emergent spacetime. A reader who follows the QES literature and the observer-rules papers will get the most out of the framing and the proposed diagnostic. It deserves a serious referee because the core idea is timely and could organize some open questions, provided the full text supplies the missing derivations and at least one concrete example.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a semiclassical diagnostic for failures of spacetime emergence from standard holographic rules, identifying the presence of 'evanescent' quantum extremal surfaces (QES). These surfaces are distinguished by an upper bound on their area term (rather than on the full generalized entropy), allowing the bulk entanglement contribution to remain large and unconstrained. This feature is attributed to an operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity in semiclassical gravity, which the abstract equates to separating the two summands of the generalized entropy.

Significance. If the proposed distinction and diagnostic can be derived rigorously, the work could provide a concrete criterion for when observer-dependent rules are required to restore emergence, extending discussions of generalized entropy and QES to cases where standard holographic reconstruction fails. Its value would lie in offering a falsifiable test based on area bounds rather than entropy minimization alone.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The diagnostic defines evanescent QES via an upper bound on area (with bulk entanglement unconstrained) rather than generalized entropy, but provides no derivation showing how this bound follows from the QES extremization condition or the semiclassical Einstein equations while preserving the extremal property.
[Abstract] Abstract: The justification invokes an operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity (equated to separating the area and bulk terms of S_gen), yet no explicit construction or controlled limit of the holographic dictionary is given to demonstrate that quantum connectivity can decouple from the area term without reducing to a re-labeling of standard generalized entropy.

minor comments (1)

The abstract would benefit from a brief statement of how the diagnostic applies to at least one concrete example of a non-emergent semiclassical spacetime from the recent literature referenced in the opening sentence.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 2 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The major comments correctly identify that the proposal for evanescent QES is presented as a diagnostic motivated by semiclassical considerations rather than a fully derived result. We have revised the abstract and added clarifying discussion in the introduction and conclusions to address the points raised, while noting the limitations of the current semiclassical treatment.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The diagnostic defines evanescent QES via an upper bound on area (with bulk entanglement unconstrained) rather than generalized entropy, but provides no derivation showing how this bound follows from the QES extremization condition or the semiclassical Einstein equations while preserving the extremal property.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain a derivation of the area bound directly from the extremization condition or the semiclassical Einstein equations. The definition is instead motivated by the requirement that the surface extremizes the full generalized entropy while the area contribution remains small in regimes where bulk entanglement dominates the variation. This is illustrated through examples in the paper but remains a heuristic at the semiclassical level. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the discussion of this motivation and explicitly flagged the absence of a first-principles derivation as an important direction for future work. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The justification invokes an operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity (equated to separating the area and bulk terms of S_gen), yet no explicit construction or controlled limit of the holographic dictionary is given to demonstrate that quantum connectivity can decouple from the area term without reducing to a re-labeling of standard generalized entropy.

Authors: The operational distinction is introduced in the paper as a way to interpret the separation of the two terms in S_gen within semiclassical gravity, where the area term tracks classical geometric connectivity and the bulk term tracks quantum correlations. We support this with references to existing holographic examples where standard reconstruction fails. We acknowledge, however, that the work does not supply a new explicit construction or controlled limit of the holographic dictionary. The diagnostic is offered as a practical semiclassical criterion rather than a theorem derived from the full dictionary. The revised manuscript includes an additional paragraph in the discussion section stating this limitation and its implications. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

A rigorous derivation of the upper bound on the area term from the QES extremization condition together with the semiclassical Einstein equations
An explicit construction or controlled limit within the holographic dictionary that demonstrates decoupling of quantum connectivity from the area term

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Diagnostic of evanescent QES defined via explicit separation of generalized entropy terms

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract]
"This feature is explained by an operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity in semiclassical gravity, or equivalently between the two summands of the generalized entropy."

The diagnostic is defined by bounding only the area term while allowing S_gen to be large. The text then presents the unconstrained bulk term as a 'feature' explained by a distinction that is explicitly equivalent to splitting S_gen = Area/4G + S_bulk. The claimed independence of the bulk term is therefore true by the definition of the diagnostic itself, not by an independent argument from the semiclassical dynamics or extremization condition.

full rationale

The paper's central diagnostic introduces evanescent QES as surfaces with an upper bound on area (rather than on S_gen) and claims their bulk entanglement term remains unconstrained. This feature is justified by invoking an operational distinction that the text itself equates to separating the two summands of S_gen. The step is therefore self-definitional: the distinguishing property follows immediately from the chosen definition rather than from a derivation using the semiclassical Einstein equations, QES extremization, or holographic dictionary. No other circular patterns (self-citation chains, fitted predictions, or imported uniqueness theorems) are evident in the provided text, keeping the overall score moderate.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Claim rests on standard definitions of QES and generalized entropy plus a new operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity; no free parameters or invented entities beyond the diagnostic surfaces themselves.

axioms (2)

standard math Quantum extremal surfaces are defined by extremizing generalized entropy
Invoked as background for the new diagnostic.
domain assumption Generalized entropy splits into area and bulk entanglement terms with distinct operational meanings
Central to explaining why area is bounded but entropy is not.

invented entities (1)

Evanescent quantum extremal surfaces no independent evidence
purpose: Diagnostic for emergence failures
Newly introduced concept distinguished by area bound.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5428 in / 1129 out tokens · 38454 ms · 2026-05-11T00:54:25.708534+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
Our diagnostic is the presence of certain 'evanescent' quantum extremal surfaces, which are distinguished by an upper bound on their area rather than their generalized entropy. In particular, the generalized entropy of an evanescent QES may be large: even though its area term must be small, its bulk entanglement term is unconstrained. This feature is explained by an operational distinction between classical and quantum connectivity in semiclassical gravity, or equivalently between the two summands of the generalized entropy.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
the contracted legs of the tensor network, which model the area term, turn out to be of paramount importance for emergence

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT

A. Almheiri, X. Dong, and D. Harlow,Bulk Locality and Quantum Error Correction in AdS/CFT,JHEP04(2015) 163, [arXiv:1411.7041]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[2]

The Ryu-Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction

D. Harlow,The Ryu-Takayanagi Formula from Quantum Error Correction,Commun. Math. Phys.354(2017), no. 3 865–912, [arXiv:1607.03901]

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[3]

Pastawski, B

F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow, and J. Preskill,Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,JHEP06 (2015) 149, [arXiv:1503.06237]

work page arXiv 2015
[4]

Hayden, S

P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter, and Z. Yang,Holographic duality from random tensor networks,JHEP11(2016) 009, [arXiv:1601.01694]

work page arXiv 2016
[5]

Akers, N

C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, D. Harlow, G. Penington, and S. Vardhan,The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity,arXiv:2207.06536. – 37 –

work page arXiv
[6]

Banks, M

T. Banks, M. R. Douglas, G. T. Horowitz, and E. J. Martinec,AdS dynamics from conformal field theory,hep-th/9808016

work page arXiv
[7]

Engelhardt and A

N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall,Decoding the Apparent Horizon: Coarse-Grained Holographic Entropy,Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018), no. 21 211301, [arXiv:1706.02038]

work page arXiv 2018
[8]

Engelhardt and A

N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall,Coarse Graining Holographic Black Holes,JHEP05 (2019) 160, [arXiv:1806.01281]

work page arXiv 2019
[9]

Engelhardt, G

N. Engelhardt, G. Penington, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam,A world without pythons would be so simple,Class. Quant. Grav.38(2021), no. 23 234001, [arXiv:2102.07774]

work page arXiv 2021
[10]

A. C. Wall,Maximin Surfaces, and the Strong Subadditivity of the Covariant Holographic Entanglement Entropy,Class.Quant.Grav.31(2014), no. 22 225007, [arXiv:1211.3494]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[11]

Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime

N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall,Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,JHEP01(2015) 073, [arXiv:1408.3203]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[12]

A. R. Brown, H. Gharibyan, G. Penington, and L. Susskind,The Python’s Lunch: geometric obstructions to decoding Hawking radiation,JHEP08(2020) 121, [arXiv:1912.00228]

work page arXiv 2020
[13]

Quantum mechanics and observers for grav- ity in a closed universe

D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk, and Y. Zhao,Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe,arXiv:2501.02359

work page arXiv
[14]

Usatyuk, Z.-Y

M. Usatyuk, Z.-Y. Wang, and Y. Zhao,Closed universes in two dimensional gravity, SciPost Phys.17(2024), no. 2 051, [arXiv:2402.00098]

work page arXiv 2024
[15]

Usatyuk and Y

M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Closed universes, factorization, and ensemble averaging, JHEP02(2025) 052, [arXiv:2403.13047]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Antonini, M

S. Antonini, M. Sasieta, and B. Swingle,Cosmology from random entanglement,JHEP 11(2023) 188, [arXiv:2307.14416]

work page arXiv 2023
[17]

Further Evidence Against a Semiclassical Baby Universe in AdS/CFT

N. Engelhardt and E. Gesteau,Further Evidence Against a Semiclassical Baby Universe in AdS/CFT,arXiv:2504.14586

work page arXiv
[18]

Gesteau,A no-go theorem for largeNclosed universes,arXiv:2509.14338

E. Gesteau,A no-go theorem for largeNclosed universes,arXiv:2509.14338

work page arXiv
[19]

McNamara and C

J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland, arXiv:2004.06738

work page arXiv 2004
[20]

Almheiri, R

A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena, and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149, [arXiv:1908.10996]

work page arXiv 2020
[21]

Observer complementarity for black holes and holography

N. Engelhardt, E. Gesteau, and D. Harlow,Observer complementarity for black holes and holography,arXiv:2507.06046

work page arXiv
[22]

Harlow, Observers,α-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,2602.03835

D. Harlow,Observers, alpha-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state, arXiv:2602.03835. – 38 –

work page arXiv
[23]

Sahu and M

A. Sahu and M. Van Raamsdonk,Holographic black hole cosmologies,JHEP05(2025) 233, [arXiv:2411.14673]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [2102.05057]

M. Van Raamsdonk,Cosmology from confinement?,JHEP03(2022) 039, [arXiv:2102.05057]

work page arXiv 2022
[26]

Liu,Towards a holographic description of closed universes,arXiv:2509.14327

H. Liu,Towards a holographic description of closed universes,arXiv:2509.14327

work page arXiv
[27]

Emergent Mixed States for Baby Universes and Black Holes

J. Kudler-Flam and E. Witten,Emergent Mixed States for Baby Universes and Black Holes,arXiv:2510.06376

work page arXiv
[28]

Liu (2025), 2512.13807

H. Liu,”Filtering” CFTs at large N: Euclidean Wormholes, Closed Universes, and Black Hole Interiors,arXiv:2512.13807

work page arXiv
[29]

R. D. Sorkin,1983 paper on entanglement entropy: ”On the Entropy of the Vacuum outside a Horizon”, in10th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 2, pp. 734–736, 1984.arXiv:1402.3589

work page arXiv 1983
[30]

Srednicki,Entropy and area,Phys

M. Srednicki,Entropy and area,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 666–669, [http://arXiv.org/abs/hep-th/9303048]

work page arXiv 1993
[31]

Susskind and J

L. Susskind and J. Uglum,Black hole entropy in canonical quantum gravity and superstring theory,Phys. Rev. D50(1994) 2700–2711, [hep-th/9401070]

work page arXiv 1994
[32]

D. N. Kabat,Black hole entropy and entropy of entanglement,Nucl. Phys. B453 (1995) 281–299, [hep-th/9503016]

work page arXiv 1995
[33]

Demers, R

J.-G. Demers, R. Lafrance, and R. C. Myers,Black hole entropy and renormalization, Fields Inst. Commun.15(2001) 227–232, [gr-qc/9507042]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2001
[34]

Jacobson,Black hole entropy and induced gravity,gr-qc/9404039

T. Jacobson,Black hole entropy and induced gravity,gr-qc/9404039

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[35]

Larsen and F

F. Larsen and F. Wilczek,Renormalization of black hole entropy and of the gravitational coupling constant,Nucl. Phys. B458(1996) 249–266, [hep-th/9506066]

work page arXiv 1996
[36]

D. V. Fursaev and S. N. Solodukhin,On one loop renormalization of black hole entropy,Phys. Lett. B365(1996) 51–55, [hep-th/9412020]

work page arXiv 1996
[37]

Winstanley,Renormalized black hole entropy via the ’brick wall’ method,Phys

E. Winstanley,Renormalized black hole entropy via the ’brick wall’ method,Phys. Rev. D63(2001) 084013, [hep-th/0011176]

work page arXiv 2001
[38]

Bousso, Z

R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer, and A. C. Wall,Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev.D93(2016), no. 6 064044, [arXiv:1506.02669]

work page arXiv 2016
[39]

Gesteau,Large N von Neumann Algebras and the Renormalization of Newton’s Constant, Commun

E. Gesteau,Large N von Neumann Algebras and the Renormalization of Newton’s Constant,Commun. Math. Phys.406(2025), no. 2 40, [arXiv:2302.01938]

work page arXiv 2025
[40]

C. Cao, G. Cheng, K. Karthikeyan, C. Li, and J. Preskill,State-dependent geometries from magic-enriched quantum codes,arXiv:2603.13475. – 39 –

work page arXiv
[41]

Van RaamsdonkBuilding up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen

M. Van Raamsdonk,Building up spacetime with quantum entanglement,Gen. Rel. Grav.42(9, 2010) 2323–2329, [arXiv:1005.3035]. [Int. J. Mod. Phys.D19,2429(2010)]

work page arXiv 2010
[42]

Van Raamsdonk,Evaporating Firewalls,JHEP11(2014) 038, [arXiv:1307.1796]

M. Van Raamsdonk,Evaporating Firewalls,JHEP11(2014) 038, [arXiv:1307.1796]

work page arXiv 2014
[43]

Cool horizons for entangled black holes

J. Maldacena and L. Susskind,Cool horizons for entangled black holes, arXiv:1306.0533

work page Pith review arXiv
[44]

Engelhardt and H

N. Engelhardt and H. Liu,Algebraic ER=EPR and Complexity Transfer, arXiv:2311.04281

work page arXiv
[45]

Engelhardt, G

N. Engelhardt, G. Penington, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam,Twice Upon a Time: Timelike-Separated Quantum Extremal Surfaces,JHEP01(2024) 033, [arXiv:2308.16226]

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

X. Dong, D. Marolf, and P. Rath,Holographic codes and bulk RG flows, arXiv:2509.21438

work page arXiv
[47]

Engelhardt, G

N. Engelhardt, G. Penington, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam,Finding pythons in unexpected places,Class. Quant. Grav.39(2022), no. 9 094002, [arXiv:2105.09316]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Jensen and J

K. Jensen and J. Sonner,Wormholes and entanglement in holography,Int. J. Mod. Phys. D23(2014), no. 12 1442003, [arXiv:1405.4817]

work page arXiv 2014
[49]

Susskind,Copenhagen vs Everett, Teleportation, and ER=EPR,Fortsch

L. Susskind,Copenhagen vs Everett, Teleportation, and ER=EPR,Fortsch. Phys.64 (2016), no. 6-7 551–564, [arXiv:1604.02589]

work page arXiv 2016
[50]

Susskind and Y

L. Susskind and Y. Zhao,Teleportation through the wormhole,Phys. Rev. D98(2018), no. 4 046016, [arXiv:1707.04354]

work page arXiv 2018
[51]

Susskind,Dear Qubitzers, GR =QM,arXiv:1708.03040

L. Susskind,Dear Qubitzers, GR =QM,arXiv:1708.03040

work page arXiv
[52]

The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix

B. Czech, J. L. Karczmarek, F. Nogueira, and M. Van Raamsdonk,The Gravity Dual of a Density Matrix,Class.Quant.Grav.29(2012) 155009, [arXiv:1204.1330]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[53]

X. Dong, D. Harlow, and A. C. Wall,Reconstruction of Bulk Operators within the Entanglement Wedge in Gauge-Gravity Duality,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 2 021601, [arXiv:1601.05416]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[54]

Engelhardt and ˚A

N. Engelhardt and ˚A. Folkestad,Canonical purification of evaporating black holes, Phys. Rev. D105(2022), no. 8 086010, [arXiv:2201.08395]

work page arXiv 2022
[55]

Penington, JHEP09, 002 (2020), arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]

G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox, arXiv:1905.08255

work page arXiv 1905
[56]

Almheiri, N

A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf, and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12(2019) 063, [arXiv:1905.08762]

work page arXiv 2019
[57]

Dutta and T

S. Dutta and T. Faulkner,A canonical purification for the entanglement wedge cross-section,arXiv:1905.00577. – 40 –

work page arXiv 1905
[58]

Akers and G

C. Akers and G. Penington,Quantum minimal surfaces from quantum error correction, SciPost Phys.12(2022), no. 5 157, [arXiv:2109.14618]

work page arXiv 2022
[59]

A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu, and A. Levine,The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,arXiv:2501.02632

work page arXiv
[60]

Akers, G

C. Akers, G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe, K. Higginbotham, J. Reinking, and R. Rodriguez, On observers in holographic maps,JHEP05(2025) 201, [arXiv:2503.09681]

work page arXiv 2025
[61]

Engelhardt and E

N. Engelhardt and E. Gesteau,to appear,
[62]

Hamilton, D.N

A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe,Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality,Phys.Rev.D73(2006) 086003, [hep-th/0506118]

work page arXiv 2006
[63]

Holographic representation of local bulk operators

A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe,Holographic representation of local bulk operators,Phys.Rev.D74(2006) 066009, [hep-th/0606141]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[64]

Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Holographic description of the black hole interior,

A. Hamilton, D. N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz, and D. A. Lowe,Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Holographic description of the black hole interior,Phys. Rev.D75(2007) 106001, [hep-th/0612053]. [Erratum: Phys. Rev.D75,129902(2007)]

work page arXiv 2007
[65]

Faulkner and M

T. Faulkner and M. Li,Asymptotically isometric codes for holography, arXiv:2211.12439

work page arXiv
[66]

Berman and H

J. Berman and H. Liu,to appear,
[67]

S. W. Hawking,Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse,Phys. Rev. D14 (1976) 2460–2473

1976
[68]

Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008 [2112.12828]

E. Witten,Gravity and the crossed product,JHEP10(2022) 008, [arXiv:2112.12828]

work page arXiv 2022
[69]

The Baby Universe is Fine and the CFT Knows It: On Holography for Closed Universes

S. Antonini, P. Rath, M. Sasieta, B. Swingle, and A. Vilar L´ opez,The Baby Universe is Fine and the CFT Knows It: On Holography for Closed Universes,arXiv:2507.10649

work page arXiv
[70]

Zhao, ”It from Bit”: The Hartle-Hawking state and quantum mechanics for de Sitter observers, 2602.05939

Y. Zhao,”It from Bit”: The Hartle-Hawking state and quantum mechanics for de Sitter observers,arXiv:2602.05939

work page arXiv
[71]

A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, R. Bousso, L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam,Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal, arXiv:2602.02682. – 41 –

work page arXiv