pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.06925 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: no theorem link

Scylla VI: Parsec-Scale Dust Extinction Maps in the SMC and LMC

Christina W. Lindberg , Claire E. Murray , Christopher J. R. Clark , Caroline Bot , Clare Burhenne , Yumi Choi , Roger E. Cohen , Steven R. Goldman
show 9 more authors
Karl D. Gordon Kristen B. W. McQuinn Julia Roman-Duval Karin M. Sandstrom Edward F. Schlafly Elizabeth Tarantino Benjamin F. Williams Petia Yanchulova Merica-Jones Catherine Zucker
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 00:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords dust extinctionMagellanic Cloudsparsec-scale mapsHST photometrykriginglog-normal distributioninterstellar mediumSMC LMC
0
0 comments X

The pith

A statistical method produces 1-parsec dust extinction maps of the Magellanic Clouds from HST data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a technique that combines kriging interpolation with Gaussian mixture modeling to create high-resolution dust extinction maps from Hubble Space Telescope photometry in the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds. This approach separates background stars statistically and corrects for line-of-sight depth effects, with simulations confirming recovery of column densities to roughly 0.1 magnitude accuracy when enough sources are present. The resulting maps at about 1 parsec resolution display fine dust structures that align closely with other interstellar medium tracers, particularly in active star-forming zones. They show that total column densities follow log-normal distributions in both galaxies, with the SMC having a slightly higher average extinction than the LMC, and identify systematic differences between dust masses estimated from extinction versus far-infrared emission.

Core claim

We present a novel methodology for mapping dust extinction in nearby galaxies at parsec-scale resolution. We apply it to 68 HST fields within the SMC and LMC using multi-band photometry. The technique uses kriging combined with Gaussian mixture modeling to isolate background sources and account for line-of-sight depth effects. Simulations recover column densities to A_V ≈ 0.1 mag accuracy with at least 1000 sources. The 4'' (~1-pc) maps show detailed structure and spatial correlation with ISM tracers in regions like 30 Doradus. Column densities follow log-normal profiles, with SMC mean extinction (e^μ=0.47 mag) slightly higher than LMC (e^μ=0.43 mag). Systematic offsets appear between dust ṁ

What carries the argument

Kriging interpolation combined with Gaussian mixture modeling to isolate background stellar sources and correct for line-of-sight depth effects while generating the extinction maps.

If this is right

  • The maps provide the highest-resolution dust extinction data available for the SMC and LMC.
  • Total column densities follow log-normal distributions in both galaxies.
  • The SMC exhibits slightly higher mean extinction than the LMC due to line-of-sight depths.
  • Systematic offsets exist between dust mass surface densities from extinction and from FIR emission.
  • The maps serve as benchmarks for dust emissivity, CO-dark gas fractions, and ISM structure in low-metallicity environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same kriging and mixture modeling approach could be tested on multi-band imaging of other nearby galaxies to produce comparable resolution maps.
  • The observed offsets between extinction and FIR dust masses may reflect real variations in grain properties or temperature at low metallicity.
  • Cross-checks with independent extinction tracers like background galaxies or gamma-ray bursts could test the simulation-based validation.
  • These maps enable direct comparison of dust distribution to young star clusters to study how extinction affects star formation on parsec scales.

Load-bearing premise

The kriging interpolation combined with Gaussian mixture modeling accurately accounts for line-of-sight depth effects and isolates background sources without introducing biases in the extinction estimates.

What would settle it

Independent measurements of dust column density in the same fields, such as from molecular line maps or submillimeter continuum, that show mismatches in spatial structure or values exceeding 0.1 mag in regions like 30 Doradus would indicate the method does not recover true extinctions reliably.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.06925 by Benjamin F. Williams, Caroline Bot, Catherine Zucker, Christina W. Lindberg, Christopher J. R. Clark, Claire E. Murray, Clare Burhenne, Edward F. Schlafly, Elizabeth Tarantino, Julia Roman-Duval, Karin M. Sandstrom, Karl D. Gordon, Kristen B. W. McQuinn, Petia Yanchulova Merica-Jones, Roger E. Cohen, Steven R. Goldman, Yumi Choi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Scylla and METAL dust map locations: Maps of the peak brightness temperature of 21 cm emission in the SMC (top; N. M. Pingel et al. 2022) and the LMC (bottom; S. Kim et al. 1999), overlaid with the footprints of the 25 Scylla fields in the SMC and 47 Scylla and METAL fields in the LMC that have N ≥ 4 filters needed to perform dust extinction mapping. In each panel, regions where fields overlap are identifi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Extinction detection limits and completeness [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Line-of-sight geometries: 1. Thin Sheet Geometry: Assuming a Gaussian stellar population distribution where the stellar distribution is much broader than the galaxy ISM (left), one can assume that any foreground stars will only experience extinction from the MW, while background stars will experience extinction from both the MW and the galaxy, making it possible to distinguish the two populations by their … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic of validation tests with 3D dust maps [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulation results: Resultant AV maps (left) and biases (right) simulated with different stellar densities (n⋆) and star-dust geometries (f, where Z⋆ = f × ZISM) to mimic the potential observational conditions within the Scylla and METAL fields (¯n⋆ = 1000 − 1600). As the scale height of stars increases (f ≫ 1), the method can more accurately recover high AV structures, since a larger fraction of sources s… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulation biases: Median extinction bias (∆AV = AV, sim − AV, true) and the ±1σ spread (shaded regions) as a function of the true AV from the simulations presented in Figure 5b. Each panel represents a different star-dust geometry, f, where f is the ratio of scale heights between the stars and the ISM (Z⋆ = f × ZISM). These simulations consistently show that increasing the number of stars (n⋆) leads to a … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Comparison with alternative methods for dust mapping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Dust extinction and emission maps: (Left) Three-color images of four Scylla and METAL fields, constructed with HST WFC3 filters F336W (blue), F475W (green), and F814W (red); (middle panels) resultant dust extinction maps and uncertainties derived from stellar SED fits (LMC: 4.1 ′′; SMC: 3.5 ′′); (right) Herschel 250 µm dust emission (6.0 ′′; C. J. R. Clark et al. 2021). Dust extinction spans over an order … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: AV distribution for all fields in the SMC (red) and LMC (blue) based on total column density measurements from extinction maps (dashed and dotted lines). These AV distributions can be characterized as log-normal distribu￾tions, especially when excluding fields within the 30 Doradus region (hatched), and peak at AV, SMC = 0.38 mag and AV, LMC = 0.28 mag. map. Since extinction is measured using stars within … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Scylla field in 30 Doradus region: (Top) Three-color image of the broader 30 Dor region (Image credit: NASA, ESA, Lennon; GO-12499) with a zoom-in of the Scylla field (15891 LMC-5421ne-12728; Image credit: ESA/Hubble & NASA, C. Murray; GO-15891). 4-panel, clockwise from top left: (1) dust extinction constructed from SED fitting and mapping in this work (4′′/0.97 pc); (2) Herschel 250 µm tracing emission f… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: AV comparison with previous extinction map in 30 Doradus region: (Left) Reproduction AV map, shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Dust mass surface density: Comparison of dust mass surface densities at 36′′ derived from FIR dust emission (ΣD, F IR) and dust extinction (ΣD, AV ) for fields in the SMC (red) and LMC (blue). Our minimum extinction threshold of AV = 3 mag is shaded in, denoting the range above which completeness might become an issue. Both galaxies show systematic offsets between the two measure￾ments. and METAL field in… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Other Dust Maps: Median dust ex￾tinction within each Scylla and METAL field compared to reddening maps from D. M. Skowron et al. (2021). We convert to E(V − I) to AV , we adopt the relation E(B − V ) = 0.808 × E(V − I) and conservatively assume RV = 3.4 for the LMC and RV = 2.7 for the SMC for both reddening maps (K. D. Gordon et al. 2014). We find that the D. M. Skowron et al. (2021) reddening map in the… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Gallery of known artifacts in the Scylla and METAL dust extinction maps. Each row highlights a different artifact. See Appendix A for a description of each artifact. APPENDIX A. ARTIFACTS We highlight several artifacts present in the Scylla and METAL extinction maps. While the reported uncertainty should capture and propagate the increased uncertainties surrounding these structures, we urge users to caref… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a novel methodology for mapping dust extinction in nearby galaxies at parsec-scale resolution. We apply it to HST 68 fields within the Small and Large Magellanic Clouds (23 fields in the SMC and 45 fields in the LMC) using multi-band HST photometry from the Scylla and METAL surveys. Our technique leverages \textit{kriging}, a geostatistical interpolation method built on the principles of Gaussian Process regression, combined with Gaussian mixture modeling to statistically isolate background stellar sources and account for line-of-sight depth effects. 3D dust simulations demonstrate the method's capability to recover column densities to an accuracy of $A_V \approx 0.1$ mag in fields with at least 1000 sources. The resulting $4^{\prime\prime}$ resolution ($\sim1$-pc) dust maps reveal detailed structure and strong spatial correlation with ancillary ISM tracers, especially in star-forming regions like 30 Doradus. Global extinction of total column densities follows log-normal profiles in both galaxies, with the SMC exhibiting slightly higher mean extinction ($e^{\mu}=0.47$ mag) than the broader LMC ($e^{\mu}=0.43$ mag), likely due to significant line-of-sight depths. We find systematic offsets between dust mass surface densities ($\Sigma_{D}$) derived from extinction versus FIR emission in both galaxies, with $\Sigma_{D, FIR}/\Sigma_{D, A_V}$ ratios ranging from $0.6-1.8$. This work provides the highest-resolution dust extinction maps in SMC and LMC to date, which offer a vital independent benchmark for constraining dust emissivity, $\text{CO}$-dark gas fractions, and the multi-scale structure of the ISM in low-metallicity environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a kriging (Gaussian process) interpolation method combined with Gaussian mixture modeling applied to HST multi-band photometry from the Scylla and METAL surveys across 68 fields (23 SMC, 45 LMC). It validates the approach via 3D dust simulations that recover A_V to ~0.1 mag accuracy for fields with >=1000 sources, then presents the resulting 4'' (~1 pc) extinction maps, their spatial correlations with ISM tracers (especially in regions like 30 Doradus), log-normal distributions of total column densities (SMC e^μ=0.47 mag vs LMC e^μ=0.43 mag), and systematic offsets between extinction-derived and FIR-derived dust surface densities (ratios 0.6-1.8).

Significance. If the core assumptions hold, this delivers the highest-resolution dust extinction maps yet for the Magellanic Clouds and supplies an independent benchmark for dust emissivity, CO-dark gas fractions, and multi-scale ISM structure in low-metallicity systems. The simulation validation demonstrating quantitative recovery accuracy is a clear strength, as are the reported correlations with ancillary tracers.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and method validation] The validation that kriging+GMM successfully isolates background sources and corrects for the known kpc-scale line-of-sight depth (Abstract; implied in the method description) rests exclusively on idealized 3D simulations with prescribed stellar populations and depth distributions. Real SMC/LMC fields contain mixed-age stars, spatially varying reddening laws, and depth variations that may not match the simulation priors; any residual bias would propagate directly into the reported spatial correlations, log-normal parameters, and Σ_D,FIR/Σ_D,A_V ratios. A cross-check against independent real-data extinction measurements (e.g., from other surveys or spectroscopic samples) is needed to confirm the claimed 0.1 mag accuracy.
  2. [Results and discussion of FIR comparison] The systematic offsets between extinction-based and FIR-based dust surface densities (Abstract; ratios ranging 0.6-1.8) are highlighted as a key result but are described as not fully resolved. Because this directly affects constraints on dust emissivity and CO-dark gas, the manuscript should expand the discussion of possible causes (e.g., assumptions in the FIR modeling or residual depth biases in the A_V maps) with quantitative tests.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'strong spatial correlation with ancillary ISM tracers'; quantify the correlation coefficients or specify the exact tracers (e.g., HI, CO, Hα) and their spatial scales for clarity.
  2. The kriging hyperparameters (length scale, variance) and GMM component number are free parameters; provide a table or explicit justification for the adopted values and any sensitivity tests performed.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed review. Their comments identify areas where additional discussion and transparency will improve the manuscript. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The validation that kriging+GMM successfully isolates background sources and corrects for the known kpc-scale line-of-sight depth (Abstract; implied in the method description) rests exclusively on idealized 3D simulations with prescribed stellar populations and depth distributions. Real SMC/LMC fields contain mixed-age stars, spatially varying reddening laws, and depth variations that may not match the simulation priors; any residual bias would propagate directly into the reported spatial correlations, log-normal parameters, and Σ_D,FIR/Σ_D,A_V ratios. A cross-check against independent real-data extinction measurements (e.g., from other surveys or spectroscopic samples) is needed to confirm the claimed 0.1 mag accuracy.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on validation robustness. Our 3D simulations incorporate stellar populations and depth distributions drawn from observational constraints in the literature for the SMC and LMC, including mixed stellar ages and kpc-scale depths, with parameter variations to test sensitivity. We acknowledge that they remain idealized with respect to spatially varying reddening laws. A full cross-check against independent real-data extinction maps at 1-pc resolution is not feasible at present, as no such uniform datasets exist for the 68 fields. We will revise the methods and discussion sections to provide greater detail on simulation priors, their limitations, and any available lower-resolution comparisons with literature values (e.g., in 30 Doradus). This constitutes a partial revision focused on transparency rather than new empirical validation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The systematic offsets between extinction-based and FIR-based dust surface densities (Abstract; ratios ranging 0.6-1.8) are highlighted as a key result but are described as not fully resolved. Because this directly affects constraints on dust emissivity and CO-dark gas, the manuscript should expand the discussion of possible causes (e.g., assumptions in the FIR modeling or residual depth biases in the A_V maps) with quantitative tests.

    Authors: We agree that the offsets merit expanded quantitative discussion given their relevance to dust emissivity and CO-dark gas. In the revised manuscript we will add tests that perturb FIR modeling assumptions (dust temperature and emissivity index) via Monte Carlo realizations and quantify their effect on the Σ_D,FIR/Σ_D,A_V ratios. We will also examine whether the offsets correlate with field properties such as local star-formation activity or estimated line-of-sight depth to assess possible residual biases in the A_V maps. These additions will clarify the range of plausible causes without altering the reported measurements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's core derivation applies kriging interpolation combined with Gaussian mixture modeling directly to HST multi-band photometry from the Scylla and METAL surveys to produce extinction maps at 4 arcsec resolution. Validation of recovery accuracy (A_V ≈ 0.1 mag for fields with ≥1000 sources) is performed on independent 3D dust simulations with prescribed depth distributions, which are external to the observational inputs. Reported results such as log-normal column-density profiles (e^μ = 0.47 mag in SMC, 0.43 mag in LMC), spatial correlations with ISM tracers, and Σ_D,FIR / Σ_D,A_V ratios are direct statistical summaries of the output maps rather than quantities fitted or defined in terms of the inputs. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked as load-bearing steps in the provided text, and the method does not rename or reconstruct known results by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method introduces no new physical entities but relies on standard statistical assumptions and some tunable parameters in the interpolation and clustering steps.

free parameters (2)
  • Kriging hyperparameters (e.g., length scale, variance)
    Typical in Gaussian Process methods, likely fitted or chosen based on data covariance.
  • Number of components in Gaussian mixture model
    Determined statistically to isolate background sources.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Assumptions of Gaussian Process regression for spatial interpolation
    Kriging relies on stationarity and Gaussianity of the underlying field.
  • domain assumption Line-of-sight depth effects can be statistically modeled with GMM
    Used to account for stars at different distances in the Clouds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1533 out tokens · 46545 ms · 2026-05-11T00:56:41.487342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

97 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s

    Akeson, R., Armus, L., Bachelet, E., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1902.05569, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1902.05569 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.05569 2019

  2. [2]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15598.x , archivePrefix =

    Bekki, K., & Stanimirovi´ c, S. 2009, MNRAS, 395, 342, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14514.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14514.x 2009

  3. [3]

    2007, ApJ, 668, 949, doi: 10.1086/521385

    Besla, G., Kallivayalil, N., Hernquist, L., et al. 2007, ApJ, 668, 949, doi: 10.1086/521385

    work page doi:10.1086/521385 2007

  4. [4]

    M., Crowther, P

    Bestenlehner, J. M., Crowther, P. A., Caballero-Nieves, S. M., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 499, 1918, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2801

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2801 2020

  5. [5]

    L., Puerari, I., Elmegreen, B

    Block, D. L., Puerari, I., Elmegreen, B. G., & Bournaud, F. 2010, ApJL, 718, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/718/1/L1

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/718/1/l1 2010

  6. [6]

    W., Mather, J

    Boggess, N. W., Mather, J. C., Weiss, R., et al. 1992, ApJ, 397, 420, doi: 10.1086/171797

    work page doi:10.1086/171797 1992

  7. [7]

    P., et al

    Boulanger, F., Abergel, A., Bernard, J. P., et al. 1996, A&A, 312, 256

    1996

  8. [8]

    2012 , month = apr, journal =

    Bressan, A., Marigo, P., Girardi, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 427, 127, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21948.x 2012

  9. [9]

    Burhenne, C., McQuinn, K. B. W., Cohen, R. E., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.02947, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.02947

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.02947 2025

  10. [10]

    C., & Lazarian, A

    Burkhart, B., Collins, D. C., & Lazarian, A. 2015, ApJ, 808, 48, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/48

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/808/1/48 2015

  11. [11]

    and Clayton, Geoffrey C

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    work page doi:10.1086/167900 1989

  12. [12]

    M., Berta, S., B´ ethermin, M., et al

    Casey, C. M., Berta, S., B´ ethermin, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 761, 140, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/761/2/140

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/761/2/140 2012

  13. [13]

    Q., Guo, H

    Chen, B. Q., Guo, H. L., Gao, J., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 1317, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac072

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac072 2022

  14. [14]

    C., Fischer, C., et al

    Chevance, M., Madden, S. C., Fischer, C., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 5279, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1106

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1106 2020

  15. [15]

    Choi, Y., Olsen, K. A. G., Besla, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4e90

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4e90 2022

  16. [16]

    L., Olsen, K., et al

    Choi, Y., Nidever, D. L., Olsen, K., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae083 24

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae083 2018

  17. [17]

    J., Williams, B

    Choi, Y., Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., et al. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 902, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb467

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb467 2020

  18. [18]

    Clark, C. J. R., Roman-Duval, J. C., Gordon, K. D., Bot, C., & Smith, M. W. L. 2021, ApJ, 921, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac16d4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac16d4 2021

  19. [19]

    Clark, C. J. R., Roman-Duval, J. C., Gordon, K. D., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb66

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbb66 2023

  20. [20]

    1992, Terra Nova, 4, 613, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00605.x

    Cressie, N. 1992, Terra Nova, 4, 613, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00605.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-3121.1992.tb00605.x 1992

  21. [21]

    A., Caballero-Nieves, S

    Crowther, P. A., Caballero-Nieves, S. M., Bostroem, K. A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 624, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw273

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw273 2016

  22. [22]

    R., Mackey, A

    Cullinane, L. R., Mackey, A. D., Da Costa, G. S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 445, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3350

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3350 2022

  23. [23]

    J., Williams, B

    Dalcanton, J. J., Williams, B. F., Lang, D., et al. 2012, ApJS, 200, 18, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/18

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/200/2/18 2012

  24. [24]

    J., Fouesneau, M., Hogg, D

    Dalcanton, J. J., Fouesneau, M., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 3, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/814/1/3 de Grijs, R., & Bono, G. 2015, AJ, 149, 179, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/149/6/179 de Grijs, R., Wicker, J. E., & Bono, G. 2014, AJ, 147, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/147/5/122

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/3 2015

  25. [25]

    E., Bailer-Jones, C

    Dharmawardena, T. E., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Fouesneau, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 228, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2790

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2790 2023

  26. [26]

    Dolphin, A. E. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 91, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05271.x D’Onghia, E., & Fox, A. J. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 363, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023251

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05271.x 2002

  27. [27]

    Draine, B. T. 2003, ARA&A, 41, 241, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.41.011802.094840 2003

  28. [28]

    , keywords =

    Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., Bendo, G., et al. 2007, ApJ, 663, 866, doi: 10.1086/518306

    work page doi:10.1086/518306 2007

  29. [29]

    T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al

    Draine, B. T., Aniano, G., Krause, O., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 172, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/172

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/172 2014

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    Edenhofer, G., Zucker, C., Frank, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347628

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347628 2024

  31. [31]

    G., Kim, S., & Staveley-Smith, L

    Elmegreen, B. G., Kim, S., & Staveley-Smith, L. 2001, ApJ, 548, 749, doi: 10.1086/319021

    work page doi:10.1086/319021 2001

  32. [32]

    S., Schmidt, W., & Mac Low, M

    Federrath, C., Roman-Duval, J., Klessen, R. S., Schmidt, W., & Mac Low, M.-M. 2010, A&A, 512, A81, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912437

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912437 2010

  33. [33]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63, doi: 10.1086/316293

    work page doi:10.1086/316293 1999

  34. [34]

    J., Barger, K

    Fox, A. J., Barger, K. A., Wakker, B. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa9bb Gaia Collaboration, Helmi, A., van Leeuwen, F., et al. 2018, A&A, 616, A12, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832698

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa9bb 2018

  35. [35]

    M., Choi, Y., Boyer, M

    Gilbert, K. M., Choi, Y., Boyer, M. L., et al. 2025, ApJS, 276, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad76af

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad76af 2025

  36. [36]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Decleir, M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 86, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/accb59

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/accb59 2023

  37. [37]

    and Clayton, Geoffrey C

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279, doi: 10.1086/376774

    work page doi:10.1086/376774 2003

  38. [38]

    D., Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C., et al

    Gordon, K. D., Roman-Duval, J., Bot, C., et al. 2014, ApJ, 797, 85, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/797/2/85

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/797/2/85 2014

  39. [39]

    D., Fouesneau, M., Arab, H., et al

    Gordon, K. D., Fouesneau, M., Arab, H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 104, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/104 G´ orski, M., Zgirski, B., Pietrzy´ nski, G., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 179, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab65ed

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/826/2/104 2016

  40. [40]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020

  41. [41]

    K., & Duffau, S

    Haschke, R., Grebel, E. K., & Duffau, S. 2011, AJ, 141, 158, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/5/158

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/141/5/158 2011

  42. [42]

    2024, A&A, 688, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245588

    Hawcroft, C., Sana, H., Mahy, L., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245588

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245588 2024

  43. [43]

    Henize, K. G. 1956, ApJS, 2, 315, doi: 10.1086/190025

    work page doi:10.1086/190025 1956

  44. [44]

    A., Shaya, E

    Hunter, D. A., Shaya, E. J., Holtzman, J. A., et al. 1995, ApJ, 448, 179, doi: 10.1086/175950

    work page doi:10.1086/175950 1995

  45. [45]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  46. [46]

    2007, ApJ, 662, 969, doi: 10.1086/517911 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S

    Imara, N., & Blitz, L. 2007, ApJ, 662, 969, doi: 10.1086/517911 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    work page doi:10.1086/517911 2007

  47. [47]

    OGLE-ing the Magellanic System: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Clouds and the Bridge Using Classical Cepheids

    Jacyszyn-Dobrzeniecka, A. M., Skowron, D. M., Mr´ oz, P., et al. 2016, AcA, 66, 149, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1602.09141

    work page Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.09141 2016

  48. [48]

    A., Staveley-Smith, L., & Bessell, M

    Kim, S., Dopita, M. A., Staveley-Smith, L., & Bessell, M. S. 1999, AJ, 118, 2797, doi: 10.1086/301116 K¨ ohler, M., Ysard, N., & Jones, A. P. 2015, A&A, 579, A15, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525646

    work page doi:10.1086/301116 1999

  49. [49]

    1941, Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady, 30, 301

    Kolmogorov, A. 1941, Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady, 30, 301

    1941

  50. [50]

    H., Glatzle, M., & Enßlin, T

    Leike, R. H., Glatzle, M., & Enßlin, T. A. 2020, A&A, 639, A138, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038169

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038169 2020

  51. [51]

    W., Murray, C

    Lindberg, C. W., Murray, C. E., Dalcanton, J. J., Peek, J. E. G., & Gordon, K. D. 2024, ApJ, 963, 58, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad18cc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad18cc 2024

  52. [52]

    W., Murray, C

    Lindberg, C. W., Murray, C. E., Yanchulova Merica-Jones, P., et al. 2025, ApJ, 982, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb4e8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb4e8 2025

  53. [53]

    2014, ApJ, 783, 17, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/17

    Liszt, H. 2014, ApJ, 783, 17, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/783/1/17

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/1/17 2014

  54. [54]

    Massana, P., Ruiz-Lara, T., No¨ el, N. E. D., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, L40, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slac030

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slac030 2022

  55. [55]

    doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15598.x , archivePrefix =

    Mastropietro, C., Burkert, A., & Moore, B. 2009, MNRAS, 399, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15406.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15406.x 2009

  56. [56]

    1963, Economic Geology, 58, 1246, doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 Scylla Dust Mapping25

    Matheron, G. 1963, Economic Geology, 58, 1246, doi: 10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 Scylla Dust Mapping25

    work page doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.58.8.1246 1963

  57. [57]

    M., Pisano, D

    McClure-Griffiths, N. M., Pisano, D. J., Calabretta, M. R., et al. 2009, ApJS, 181, 398, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/398

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/398 2009

  58. [58]

    D., Indebetouw, R., et al

    Meixner, M., Gordon, K. D., Indebetouw, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 2268, doi: 10.1086/508185

    work page doi:10.1086/508185 2006

  59. [59]

    2013, AJ, 146, 62, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/3/62

    Meixner, M., Panuzzo, P., Roman-Duval, J., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 62, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/3/62

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/3/62 2013

  60. [60]

    C., Anderson, L., Leistedt, B., et al

    Miller, A. C., Anderson, L., Leistedt, B., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2202.06797, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2202.06797

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.06797 2022

  61. [61]

    2021, GeoStat-Framework/PyKrige: v1.6.0, v1.6.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4661732

    Murphy, B., M¨ uller, S., & Yurchak, R. 2021, GeoStat-Framework/PyKrige: v1.6.0, v1.6.0 Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4661732

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4661732 2021

  62. [62]

    E., Peek, J

    Murray, C. E., Peek, J. E. G., Di Teodoro, E. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 267, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab510f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab510f 2019

  63. [63]

    E., Hasselquist, S., Peek, J

    Murray, C. E., Hasselquist, S., Peek, J. E. G., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 962, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1591

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1591

  64. [64]

    E., Lindberg, C

    Murray, C. E., Lindberg, C. W., Yanchulova Merica-Jones, P., et al. 2024b, ApJS, 275, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad6de2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ad6de2

  65. [65]

    J., van Duinen, R., et al

    Neugebauer, G., Habing, H. J., van Duinen, R., et al. 1984, ApJL, 278, L1, doi: 10.1086/184209

    work page doi:10.1086/184209 1984

  66. [66]

    L., Majewski, S

    Nidever, D. L., Majewski, S. R., & Butler Burton, W. 2008, ApJ, 679, 432, doi: 10.1086/587042

    work page doi:10.1086/587042 2008

  67. [67]

    L., Olsen, K., Walker, A

    Nidever, D. L., Olsen, K., Walker, A. R., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 199, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa8d1c

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa8d1c 2017

  68. [68]

    2001, ApJL, 555, L33, doi: 10.1086/321735

    Padoan, P., Kim, S., Goodman, A., & Staveley-Smith, L. 2001, ApJL, 555, L33, doi: 10.1086/321735

    work page doi:10.1086/321735 2001

  69. [69]

    2020, ApJ, 893, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b75

    Patel, E., Kallivayalil, N., Garavito-Camargo, N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 121, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b75

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7b75 2020

  70. [70]

    2019, arXiv e-prints

    Pietrzynski, G., Graczyk, D., Gallenne, A., et al. 2019, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.08096

    work page arXiv 2019

  71. [71]

    M., Dempsey, J., McClure-Griffiths, N

    Pingel, N. M., Dempsey, J., McClure-Griffiths, N. M., et al. 2022, PASA, 39, e005, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2021.59 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2011, A&A, 536, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201116464 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 586, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424945

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.59 2022

  72. [72]

    L., Snow, T

    Rachford, B. L., Snow, T. P., Destree, J. D., et al. 2009, ApJS, 180, 125, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/125 Rezaei Kh., S., Bailer-Jones, C. A. L., Hogg, D. W., &

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/180/1/125 2009

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    Schultheis, M. 2018, A&A, 618, A168, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833284

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833284 2018

  74. [74]

    B., Williams, B., et al

    Roman-Duval, J., Jenkins, E. B., Williams, B., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 151, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf8bb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaf8bb 2019

  75. [75]

    B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al

    Roman-Duval, J., Jenkins, E. B., Tchernyshyov, K., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdeb6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdeb6 2021

  76. [76]

    J., Fullerton, A

    Roman-Duval, J., Fischer, W. J., Fullerton, A. W., et al. 2025, ApJ, 985, 109, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adc45b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adc45b 2025

  77. [77]

    Romaniello, M., Panagia, N., Scuderi, S., & Kirshner, R. P. 2002, AJ, 123, 915, doi: 10.1086/338430

    work page doi:10.1086/338430 2002

  78. [78]

    C., & Dopita, M

    Russell, S. C., & Dopita, M. A. 1992, ApJ, 384, 508, doi: 10.1086/170893

    work page doi:10.1086/170893 1992

  79. [79]

    J., et al

    Sabbi, E., Anderson, J., Lennon, D. J., et al. 2013, AJ, 146, 53, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/146/3/53

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/146/3/53 2013

  80. [80]

    L., Madore, B

    Scowcroft, V., Freedman, W. L., Madore, B. F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 49, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/816/2/49

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/816/2/49 2016

Showing first 80 references.