pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07167 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

GPROF-IR: An Improved Single-Channel Infrared Precipitation Retrieval for Merged Satellite Precipitation Products

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph
keywords precipitation retrievalinfrared observationsconvolutional neural networksatellite mergingIMERGGPROFgeostationary infrared
0
0 comments X

The pith

A convolutional neural network trained on half-hourly geostationary infrared observations produces precipitation estimates that are more accurate than conventional infrared methods and consistent with passive microwave retrievals over land.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents GPROF-IR, which applies a convolutional neural network to half-hourly single-channel infrared satellite data to estimate precipitation. It trains the network to produce results consistent with passive microwave retrievals, allowing better integration into merged products like IMERG. This addresses inconsistencies between different sensor types that currently cause artifacts in time series of precipitation estimates. If the method works, it enables more reliable quasi-global precipitation data at high temporal resolution from 1998 to the present. Readers care because accurate precipitation is key for weather forecasting, hydrology, and climate monitoring, and filling gaps without introducing biases is a persistent challenge.

Core claim

GPROF-IR is a novel IR precipitation retrieval that leverages a convolutional neural network to improve precipitation estimates from single-channel IR observations by exploiting both spatial and temporal information content in geostationary IR observations. The model is designed for integration into the upcoming release of the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrieval for GPM (IMERG V08) and produces estimates that are climatologically consistent with the GPROF-NN PMW retrieval. Evaluations using independent global reference measurements show substantial improvements over conventional IR retrievals, with lower mean squared error and higher correlation coefficient than IMERG V07 PMW estimates over

What carries the argument

A convolutional neural network that processes sequences of half-hourly single-channel geostationary infrared observations to estimate precipitation rates while enforcing consistency with passive microwave retrievals.

Load-bearing premise

That matching the climatology of the PMW retrieval through training will produce accurate estimates against independent references without systematic biases over sea surfaces or shallow precipitation.

What would settle it

Direct comparison of GPROF-IR estimates against independent global reference measurements in regions dominated by shallow precipitation or over oceans, checking for increased errors or biases relative to existing methods.

read the original abstract

Current merged precipitation products such as IMERG, GSMAP, and CMORPH combine satellite estimates from passive microwave (PMW) and infrared (IR) observations. However, the different information content of these sensors makes it challenging to produce consistent precipitation estimates, even for coincident observations. The resulting inconsistencies between PMW and IR retrievals can introduce artifacts in the temporal evolution of merged precipitation fields and lead to an overreliance on time-propagated PMW estimates. We introduce GPROF-IR, a novel IR precipitation retrieval that leverages a convolutional neural network to improve precipitation estimates from single-channel IR observations. We demonstrate that the proposed model is able to leverage the temporal information in half-hourly IR observations to improve precipitation estimates. GPROF-IR is designed for integration into the upcoming release of the Integrated Multi-Satellite Retrieval for GPM (IMERG V08) and produces estimates that are climatologically consistent with the GPROF-NN PMW retrieval. We evaluate GPROF-IR using independent, global reference measurements and demonstrate substantial improvements over conventional IR retrievals. GPROF-IR provides lower mean squared error and higher correlation coefficient than IMERG V07 PMW estimates over continental land masses but remains below the accuracy of PMW precipitation estimates over sea surfaces and climate regimes with a greater influence from shallow precipitation. By expoiting both spatial and temporal information content in geostationary IR observations, GPROF-IR establishes a new state of the art for single-channel IR precipitation retrievals. GPROF-IR can be used to quasi-global precipitation estimates at half-hourly resolution from 1998 onward, providing a consistent and accurate foundation for improving merged precipitation products.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces GPROF-IR, a convolutional neural network (CNN) model for single-channel infrared (IR) precipitation retrieval from geostationary observations. The model exploits both spatial and temporal information in half-hourly IR data and is trained to produce estimates climatologically consistent with the GPROF-NN passive microwave (PMW) retrieval. Evaluations against independent global reference measurements claim lower mean squared error and higher correlation than IMERG V07 PMW estimates over land, while noting lower accuracy than PMW over sea surfaces and in shallow precipitation regimes. The approach is positioned for integration into IMERG V08 to reduce inconsistencies in merged precipitation products and enable quasi-global half-hourly estimates from 1998 onward.

Significance. If the performance claims are substantiated, this work could meaningfully improve the temporal consistency and accuracy of long-term merged satellite precipitation datasets such as IMERG by providing a more reliable single-channel IR component that aligns with PMW climatology. The use of temporal information in IR observations addresses a known limitation in conventional IR retrievals and could reduce artifacts from time-propagated PMW estimates, with broad value for climate monitoring and hydrological applications.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract: The central claim that GPROF-IR 'establishes a new state of the art for single-channel IR precipitation retrievals' by exploiting spatial and temporal information requires explicit quantitative comparisons to other recent single-channel IR methods (beyond conventional baselines and IMERG V07 PMW). Without these, the SOTA assertion rests primarily on improvements over PMW over land, which is not a single-channel IR baseline.
  2. Methods section: Insufficient detail is provided on the CNN architecture, training dataset composition, loss function used to enforce climatological consistency with GPROF-NN, and hyperparameter tuning. These elements are load-bearing for the claim that the model extracts additional information from IR observations rather than simply reproducing PMW statistics.
  3. Evaluation section: The reported gains over land (lower MSE, higher correlation than IMERG V07 PMW) are promising, but the training objective of climatological consistency with GPROF-NN risks propagating known PMW biases into GPROF-IR, particularly in shallow precipitation and over-sea regimes where the paper already notes inferior performance. A stratified error analysis (by regime, surface type, and rain rate) and comparison against independent references without PMW influence is needed to confirm that improvements reflect genuine IR information gain rather than reference-dependent fitting.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: Typographical error: 'expoiting' should read 'exploiting'.
  2. Abstract: The statement of lower MSE and higher correlation over land would be clearer if it referenced the specific quantitative values, table, or figure containing those results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have carefully reviewed each point and will make revisions to strengthen the paper accordingly. Our responses to the major comments are provided below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim that GPROF-IR 'establishes a new state of the art for single-channel IR precipitation retrievals' by exploiting spatial and temporal information requires explicit quantitative comparisons to other recent single-channel IR methods (beyond conventional baselines and IMERG V07 PMW). Without these, the SOTA assertion rests primarily on improvements over PMW over land, which is not a single-channel IR baseline.

    Authors: We agree that the state-of-the-art claim would be more robust with explicit quantitative comparisons to other recent single-channel IR retrieval methods. In the revised manuscript, we will add such comparisons to relevant recent IR-based approaches from the literature, alongside our existing baselines, and update the abstract to accurately reflect these results and the specific improvements demonstrated. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Methods section: Insufficient detail is provided on the CNN architecture, training dataset composition, loss function used to enforce climatological consistency with GPROF-NN, and hyperparameter tuning. These elements are load-bearing for the claim that the model extracts additional information from IR observations rather than simply reproducing PMW statistics.

    Authors: We appreciate this feedback. The revised Methods section will be expanded to provide full details on the CNN architecture (including layer structure, kernel sizes, and activations), the training dataset (sources, spatial/temporal coverage, and preprocessing steps), the loss function (including the specific formulation for enforcing climatological consistency with GPROF-NN), and the hyperparameter tuning procedure. These additions will clarify how the model leverages IR information beyond PMW statistics. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Evaluation section: The reported gains over land (lower MSE, higher correlation than IMERG V07 PMW) are promising, but the training objective of climatological consistency with GPROF-NN risks propagating known PMW biases into GPROF-IR, particularly in shallow precipitation and over-sea regimes where the paper already notes inferior performance. A stratified error analysis (by regime, surface type, and rain rate) and comparison against independent references without PMW influence is needed to confirm that improvements reflect genuine IR information gain rather than reference-dependent fitting.

    Authors: We acknowledge the risk of bias propagation through the consistency objective. However, all evaluations are performed against independent global reference measurements that do not incorporate PMW data, as stated in the manuscript. The inferior performance in shallow precipitation and over-sea regimes is already highlighted as a limitation inherent to IR observations. In the revised manuscript, we will add a stratified error analysis by surface type, precipitation regime, and rain rate bins to further demonstrate genuine information gain from the temporal IR context. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper trains a CNN-based IR retrieval to produce outputs climatologically consistent with an existing GPROF-NN PMW retrieval and then evaluates the resulting estimates against independent global reference measurements. Performance claims (lower MSE/higher correlation than conventional IR and IMERG V07 PMW over land) rest on these external benchmarks rather than on the training targets themselves. No equations, self-citations, or fitted parameters are shown to reduce the central claims to inputs by construction; the model is presented as a data-driven improvement whose accuracy is externally falsifiable.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; specific training assumptions, data sources, and model hyperparameters are not detailed in the provided text.

free parameters (1)
  • CNN weights and hyperparameters
    Neural network parameters are fitted during training to match target PMW estimates and reference data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Single-channel IR observations contain extractable precipitation information when temporal context is included
    Core premise enabling the CNN approach over conventional IR methods.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5617 in / 1241 out tokens · 42705 ms · 2026-05-11T01:34:30.205370+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

173 extracted references · 173 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Reviews of Geophysics , author =

    An. Reviews of Geophysics , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1029/2019RG000678 , abstract =

  2. [2]

    Nat Commun , author =

    Separability and geometry of object manifolds in deep neural networks , volume =. Nat Commun , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14578-5 , abstract =

  3. [3]

    Accurate,

    Goyal, Priya and Dollár, Piotr and Girshick, Ross and Noordhuis, Pieter and Wesolowski, Lukasz and Kyrola, Aapo and Tulloch, Andrew and Jia, Yangqing and He, Kaiming , month = apr, year =. Accurate,

  4. [4]

    Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology , author =

    Development and. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1175/JAMC-D-20-0084.1 , abstract =

  5. [5]

    Liu, Zhuang and Mao, Hanzi and Wu, Chao-Yuan and Feichtenhofer, Christoph and Darrell, Trevor and Xie, Saining , year =. A

  6. [6]

    , month = mar, year =

    Smith, Leslie N. , month = mar, year =. Cyclical. 2017. doi:10.1109/WACV.2017.58 , abstract =

  7. [7]

    He, Kaiming and Zhang, Xiangyu and Ren, Shaoqing and Sun, Jian , month = jun, year =. Deep. 2016. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 , abstract =

  8. [8]

    Revisiting

    Bello, Irwan and Fedus, William and Du, Xianzhi and Cubuk, Ekin D and Srinivas, Aravind and Lin, Tsung-Yi and Shlens, Jonathon and Zoph, Barret , keywords =. Revisiting

  9. [9]

    Wightman, Ross and Touvron, Hugo and Jégou, Hervé , month = oct, year =

  10. [10]

    Yu, Fisher and Wang, Dequan and Shelhamer, Evan and Darrell, Trevor , month = jun, year =. Deep. 2018. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2018.00255 , abstract =

  11. [11]

    In: 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pp

    Xie, Saining and Girshick, Ross and Dollar, Piotr and Tu, Zhuowen and He, Kaiming , month = jul, year =. Aggregated. 2017. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.634 , abstract =

  12. [12]

    Densely Connected Convolutional Networks

    Huang, Gao and Liu, Zhuang and Van Der Maaten, Laurens and Weinberger, Kilian Q. , month = jul, year =. Densely. 2017. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.243 , language =

  13. [13]

    Tan, Mingxing and Le, Quoc V , year =

  14. [14]

    Neurocomputing , author =

    Deep visual domain adaptation:. Neurocomputing , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2018.05.083 , language =

  15. [15]

    Sandler, Mark and Howard, Andrew and Zhu, Menglong and Zhmoginov, Andrey and Chen, Liang-Chieh , month = jun, year =. 2018. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2018.00474 , abstract =

  16. [16]

    Decoupled

    Loshchilov, Ilya and Hutter, Frank , month = jan, year =. Decoupled

  17. [17]

    Wang, Yingheng and Schiff, Yair and Gokaslan, Aaron and Pan, Weishen and Wang, Fei and De Sa, Christopher and Kuleshov, Volodymyr , month = jun, year =

  18. [18]

    Dosovitskiy, Alexey and Beyer, Lucas and Kolesnikov, Alexander and Weissenborn, Dirk and Zhai, Xiaohua and Unterthiner, Thomas and Dehghani, Mostafa and Minderer, Matthias and Heigold, Georg and Gelly, Sylvain and Uszkoreit, Jakob and Houlsby, Neil , month = jun, year =. An

  19. [19]

    Aytekin, Caglar , month = oct, year =. Neural

  20. [20]

    Multiscale Vision Transformers , isbn =

    Caron, Mathilde and Touvron, Hugo and Misra, Ishan and Jegou, Herve and Mairal, Julien and Bojanowski, Piotr and Joulin, Armand , month = oct, year =. Emerging. 2021. doi:10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00951 , language =

  21. [21]

    Kovachki, Nikola and Li, Zongyi and Liu, Burigede and Azizzadenesheli, Kamyar and Bhattacharya, Kaushik and Stuart, Andrew and Anandkumar, Anima , month = apr, year =. Neural

  22. [22]

    Rethinking

    Chen, Liang-Chieh and Papandreou, George and Schroff, Florian and Adam, Hartwig , month = dec, year =. Rethinking

  23. [23]

    Liu, Ze and Lin, Yutong and Cao, Yue and Hu, Han and Wei, Yixuan and Zhang, Zheng and Lin, Stephen and Guo, Baining , month = oct, year =. Swin. 2021. doi:10.1109/ICCV48922.2021.00986 , abstract =

  24. [24]

    Hu, Han and Zhang, Zheng and Xie, Zhenda and Lin, Stephen , month = apr, year =. Local

  25. [25]

    Lam, Remi and Sanchez-Gonzalez, Alvaro and Willson, Matthew and Wirnsberger, Peter and Fortunato, Meire and Alet, Ferran and Ravuri, Suman and Ewalds, Timo and Eaton-Rosen, Zach and Hu, Weihua and Merose, Alexander and Hoyer, Stephan and Holland, George and Vinyals, Oriol and Stott, Jacklynn and Pritzel, Alexander and Mohamed, Shakir and Battaglia, Peter ...

  26. [26]

    A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning , journal =

    A review on the attention mechanism of deep learning , volume =. Neurocomputing , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2021.03.091 , abstract =

  27. [27]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    Tropical. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2020 , note =. doi:10.1029/2020JD033107 , abstract =

  28. [28]

    Clim Dyn , author =

    Global precipitation hindcast quality assessment of the. Clim Dyn , author =. 2019 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s00382-018-4457-z , abstract =

  29. [29]

    Journal of Hydrology , author =

    Evaluation of. Journal of Hydrology , author =. 2021 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127058 , abstract =

  30. [30]

    2021 , pages =

    AAAI , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1609/aaai.v35i17.17749 , abstract =

  31. [31]

    Zhang, Richard , month = jun, year =. Making

  32. [32]

    Tran, Du and Wang, Heng and Torresani, Lorenzo and Ray, Jamie and LeCun, Yann and Paluri, Manohar , month = apr, year =. A

  33. [33]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    Outcomes of the. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-22-0046.1 , abstract =

  34. [34]

    Parameter-

    Houlsby, Neil and Giurgiu, Andrei and Jastrzebski, Stanislaw and Morrone, Bruna and de Laroussilhe, Quentin and Gesmundo, Andrea and Attariyan, Mona and Gelly, Sylvain , month = jun, year =. Parameter-

  35. [35]

    Gao, Peng and Ma, Teli and Li, Hongsheng and Lin, Ziyi and Dai, Jifeng and Qiao, Yu , month = may, year =

  36. [36]

    Ryali, Chaitanya and Hu, Yuan-Ting and Bolya, Daniel and Wei, Chen and Fan, Haoqi and Huang, Po-Yao and Aggarwal, Vaibhav and Chowdhury, Arkabandhu and Poursaeed, Omid and Hoffman, Judy and Malik, Jitendra and Li, Yanghao and Feichtenhofer, Christoph , month = jun, year =. Hiera:

  37. [37]

    Ronneberger, Olaf and Fischer, Philipp and Brox, Thomas , editor =. U-. Medical. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28 , abstract =

  38. [38]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    Cloud ice:. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2009 , note =. doi:10.1029/2008JD010015 , abstract =

  39. [39]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    A global survey of the instantaneous linkages between cloud vertical structure and large-scale climate , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1002/2013JD020669 , abstract =

  40. [40]

    Nature Geosci , author =

    Clouds, circulation and climate sensitivity , volume =. Nature Geosci , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1038/ngeo2398 , abstract =

  41. [41]

    Journal of Climate , author =

    Radiative. Journal of Climate , author =. 2000 , note =. doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<0264:REOCTV>2.0.CO;2 , abstract =

  42. [42]

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , author =

    Assessing observed and modelled spatial distributions of ice water path using satellite data , volume =. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.5194/acp-11-375-2011 , number =

  43. [43]

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , author =

    An update on global atmospheric ice estimates from satellite observations and reanalyses , volume =. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018 , number =

  44. [44]

    and Pfreundschuh, S

    Amell, A. and Pfreundschuh, S. and Eriksson, P. , year =. The. doi:10.5194/egusphere-2023-1953 , journal =

  45. [45]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =

    Ice water path retrievals from. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.5194/amt-15-5701-2022 , number =

  46. [46]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =

    A neural network approach to estimating a posteriori distributions of. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.5194/amt-11-4627-2018 , number =

  47. [47]

    Surv Geophys , author =

    Lessons. Surv Geophys , author =. 2024 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s10712-024-09824-0 , abstract =

  48. [48]

    IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sensing , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1109/TGRS.2020.3015155 , abstract =

  49. [49]

    Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems , author =

    Toward an object-based assessment of high-resolution forecasts of long-lived convective precipitation in the central. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems , author =. 2015 , note =. doi:10.1002/2015MS000497 , abstract =

  50. [50]

    Convolutional

    SHI, Xingjian and Chen, Zhourong and Wang, Hao and Yeung, Dit-Yan and Wong, Wai-kin and WOO, Wang-chun , year =. Convolutional. Advances in

  51. [51]

    Remote Sensing , author =

    Precipitation. Remote Sensing , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.3390/rs14132992 , abstract =

  52. [52]

    Google Docs , month = nov, year =

    Improved temporal and spectral merging of satellite observations for precipitation cloud-property retrievals , url =. Google Docs , month = nov, year =

  53. [53]

    https://www.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/fy-22-strategic-plan-1.pdf?emrc=ff1a1e , url =

  54. [54]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    The. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-20-0299.1 , abstract =

  55. [55]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    A. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1029/2020JD034202 , abstract =

  56. [56]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    A. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2019 , note =. doi:10.1029/2019JD030449 , abstract =

  57. [57]

    Clim Dyn , author =

    Special issue:. Clim Dyn , author =. 2020 , pages =. doi:10.1007/s00382-020-05240-3 , language =

  58. [58]

    A review on regional convection‐permitting climate modeling:

  59. [59]

    2024 , doi =

    Read ". 2024 , doi =

  60. [60]

    and Bolvin, David T

    Huffman, George J. and Bolvin, David T. and Braithwaite, Dan and Hsu, Kuo-Lin and Joyce, Robert J. and Kidd, Christopher and Nelkin, Eric J. and Sorooshian, Soroosh and Stocker, Erich F. and Tan, Jackson and Wolff, David B. and Xie, Pingping , editor =. Integrated. Satellite. 2020 , doi =

  61. [61]

    Personal communication , author =

  62. [62]
  63. [63]

    2021 , note =

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2021 , note =. doi:10.1029/2020GL092032 , abstract =

  64. [64]

    2024 , note =

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2024 , note =. doi:10.5194/amt-17-515-2024 , abstract =

  65. [65]

    and Becker, A

    Schneider, U. and Becker, A. and Finger, P. and Meyer-Christoffer, A. and Rudolf, B. and Ziese, M. , year =

  66. [66]

    Schmude, Johannes and Roy, Sujit and Trojak, Will and Jakubik, Johannes and Civitarese, Daniel Salles and Singh, Shraddha and Kuehnert, Julian and Ankur, Kumar and Gupta, Aman and Phillips, Christopher E. and Kienzler, Romeo and Szwarcman, Daniela and Gaur, Vishal and Shinde, Rajat and Lal, Rohit and Silva, Arlindo Da and Diaz, Jorge Luis Guevara and Jone...

  67. [67]

    Multiscale

    Guilloteau, Clément and Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi , editor =. Multiscale. Satellite. 2020 , doi =

  68. [68]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =

    An improved near-real-time precipitation retrieval for. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , author =. 2022 , note =. doi:10.5194/amt-15-6907-2022 , abstract =

  69. [69]

    Tran, Du and Wang, Heng and Torresani, Lorenzo and Ray, Jamie and LeCun, Yann and Paluri, Manohar , month = apr, year =. A. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1711.11248 , abstract =

  70. [70]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    The. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2014 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00164.1 , abstract =

  71. [71]

    Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology , author =

    A. Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology , author =. 1988 , note =. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1988)027<0030:ASITTE>2.0.CO;2 , abstract =

  72. [72]

    Monthly Weather Review , author =

    Rain. Monthly Weather Review , author =. 1978 , note =. doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1978)106<1153:REFGSI>2.0.CO;2 , abstract =

  73. [73]

    Journal of Hydrometeorology , author =

    Integrating. Journal of Hydrometeorology , author =. 2023 , note =. doi:10.1175/JHM-D-23-0006.1 , abstract =

  74. [74]

    IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , author =

    The. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing , author =. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2403303 , abstract =

  75. [75]

    and Weng, Fuzhong , editor =

    Goldberg, Mitchell D. and Weng, Fuzhong , editor =. Advanced. Earth. 2006 , doi =

  76. [76]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    Multi-. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2016 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00173.1 , abstract =

  77. [77]

    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =

    The. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences , author =. 2007 , note =. doi:10.1175/2006JAS2375.1 , abstract =

  78. [78]

    Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =

    So,. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society , author =. 2017 , note =. doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00283.1 , abstract =

  79. [79]

    Hastings, D. A. (David A. ) and Dunbar, Paula K. , month = aug, year =. Global

  80. [80]

    Journal of Hydrology , author =

    Inter-comparison of radar rainfall rate using. Journal of Hydrology , author =. 2015 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.08.063 , abstract =

Showing first 80 references.