arxiv: 2605.07349 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 💻 cs.DS

Recognition: no theorem link

Optimal Learning-Augmented Algorithm for Online Bidding

Changki Yun, Changyeol Lee, Dahoon Lee, Jongseo Lee, Yongho Shin

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DS

keywords online biddinglearning-augmented algorithmsrandomized algorithmsbidding profilesdelayed differential equationsPareto optimalityconsistency-robustness trade-offlinear search

0 comments

The pith

The paper presents a Pareto-optimal randomized learning-augmented algorithm for online bidding by reducing all algorithms to bidding profiles and solving for the optimum with delayed differential equations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to close the remaining gap between upper and lower bounds on the consistency-robustness trade-off for randomized learning-augmented algorithms in online bidding. It introduces bidding profiles to represent the distribution of bids an algorithm generates, proves that every bidding algorithm reduces to an equivalent profile-driven version without loss of performance, and derives the optimal profile as the solution to a system of delayed differential equations. If correct, this yields algorithms that achieve the best possible guarantees when machine-learning predictions are accurate while remaining robust when predictions fail. The same reduction and equation-based characterization also improves prior learning-augmented algorithms for the linear search problem. Readers interested in online optimization with predictions would care because the result supplies the first matching upper and lower bounds in the randomized case.

Core claim

We close this gap by presenting a Pareto-optimal randomized learning-augmented algorithm for online bidding. Our approach introduces the notion of a bidding profile, a novel framework for representing the distribution over bids generated by an algorithm. We show that any bidding algorithm can be reduced, without loss of generality, to one driven by a bidding profile, and we characterize the optimal profile via a system of delayed differential equations. Finally, we demonstrate the broader applicability of our approach by extending it to the linear search problem, yielding a significant improvement over prior learning-augmented algorithms for linear search.

What carries the argument

Bidding profile: a framework that encodes the distribution over bids an algorithm generates, to which every bidding algorithm reduces without loss of generality and whose optimal form is characterized by a system of delayed differential equations.

If this is right

The algorithm achieves the Pareto-optimal consistency-robustness trade-off for randomized online bidding.
Every bidding algorithm is performance-equivalent to one driven by a bidding profile.
The optimal bidding profile is given explicitly by the solution of a system of delayed differential equations.
The same reduction and characterization produce improved learning-augmented algorithms for linear search.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The bidding-profile reduction may simplify analysis of randomized decision distributions in other online problems that admit learning augmentation.
Numerical integration of the delayed differential equations could yield concrete algorithms for any fixed prediction quality.
Differential-equation techniques may generalize to derive optimal learning-augmented algorithms for additional online optimization settings.
The framework suggests that representation reductions can turn continuous-time characterizations into practical randomized online algorithms.

Load-bearing premise

Any bidding algorithm can be reduced without loss of generality to one driven by a bidding profile.

What would settle it

A concrete randomized bidding algorithm that achieves a strictly better consistency-robustness trade-off point than the profile obtained from the delayed differential equations, or an explicit algorithm whose performance cannot be matched by any profile-driven algorithm.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07349 by Changki Yun, Changyeol Lee, Dahoon Lee, Jongseo Lee, Yongho Shin.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Robustness-consistency trade-offs of (a) online bidding and (b) linear search. All axes use logarithmic scaling. (a) The solid blue curve depicts our Pareto-optimal trade-off (Theorem 1), while the dash-dotted red and dashed orange curves represent the upper and lower bounds from [SLLA25], respectively. The dotted brown curve shows the trade-off achieved by [AS25]. The violet point corresponds to the class… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Representative bidding profiles G for three regimes of s which determines the trade-off. The shaded strip highlights the interval (0, 1]. Proof sketch. Recall that a bidding strategy is a probability distribution over bi-infinite increasing sequences in (0, ∞). Hence, given a ρ-robust χ-consistent bidding strategy A with prediction P = 1, by simply accumulating the probability measure value-wise, we can ob… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent advances in machine learning have spurred significant interest in learning-augmented algorithms, particularly for online optimization. A growing body of work has studied online bidding in this framework, aiming to characterize the trade-off between robustness and consistency. While this trade-off is fully understood for deterministic algorithms, a gap between upper and lower bounds remains in the randomized setting. In this paper, we close this gap by presenting a Pareto-optimal randomized learning-augmented algorithm for this problem. Our approach introduces the notion of a bidding profile, a novel framework for representing the distribution over bids generated by an algorithm. We show that any bidding algorithm can be reduced, without loss of generality, to one driven by a bidding profile, and we characterize the optimal profile via a system of delayed differential equations. Finally, we demonstrate the broader applicability of our approach by extending it to the linear search problem, yielding a significant improvement over prior learning-augmented algorithms for linear search.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper closes the randomized gap for learning-augmented online bidding by reducing to bidding profiles and solving via delayed differential equations, but the w.l.o.g. reduction is the load-bearing claim that needs direct verification.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work targets the remaining gap between upper and lower bounds for randomized learning-augmented online bidding. It introduces bidding profiles as a way to represent the distribution over bids an algorithm produces, claims any bidding algorithm reduces to one driven by such a profile without loss, and then characterizes the optimal profile by solving a system of delayed differential equations. They also extend the same method to linear search and report an improvement there. That is the concrete advance over prior literature that left the randomized case open. The framework itself is new and gives a clean way to turn the problem into a differential-equation optimization, which is a reasonable move for these kinds of continuous trade-off characterizations. If the reduction holds, the resulting algorithm is Pareto-optimal by construction and the extension shows the idea travels. The soft spot is the reduction step itself. The abstract states it as without loss of generality, yet the interaction between the learning advice and the randomization is exactly where things can break: if the profile representation silently restricts the support of the distributions or how the advice is used at decision time, then the DDE solution is optimal only inside the restricted class, not over all algorithms. The circularity worry is real if optimality is defined relative to the profile framework rather than independently. Without the full proof details it is impossible to tell whether the reduction preserves the robustness-consistency trade-off for every possible algorithm. The rest of the paper looks formally standard for the area, with no obvious data or citation problems. This is for people working on learning-augmented online algorithms and auction design who want tight randomized bounds. A reader who cares about closing specific gaps or adapting differential-equation methods to other online problems will get value from the technique. It deserves a serious referee because it addresses an acknowledged open question with a novel representation, even though the central reduction will require careful checking.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to close the gap between upper and lower bounds for randomized learning-augmented online bidding by introducing bidding profiles (distributions over bids) as a novel representation framework. It asserts that any bidding algorithm reduces without loss of generality to one driven by such a profile, characterizes the optimal profile via a system of delayed differential equations, and extends the technique to obtain an improved algorithm for the linear search problem.

Significance. If the w.l.o.g. reduction is valid and the DDE characterization is independently grounded, the result would provide the first Pareto-optimal randomized learning-augmented algorithm for online bidding, fully resolving the robustness-consistency trade-off. The extension to linear search and the use of DDEs for deriving optimal profiles represent a technically distinctive approach with potential applicability to other online optimization problems with advice.

major comments (2)

[Bidding profile framework section] The section introducing the bidding profile framework and the reduction claim: the assertion that any randomized bidding algorithm (including those using learning-augmented advice) reduces without loss of generality to a bidding-profile-driven algorithm is load-bearing for the Pareto-optimality result. The proof must explicitly verify that the reduction preserves the full set of achievable robustness-consistency pairs and does not impose hidden restrictions on support or measurability of bid distributions.
[DDE characterization section] The section deriving the DDE system: the optimality characterization via delayed differential equations must be shown to be derived from the underlying online bidding problem rather than being internal to the bidding-profile definition; otherwise the claimed Pareto optimality risks being tautological with respect to the framework.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and Introduction] The abstract and introduction could more explicitly compare the achieved robustness-consistency curve against the prior best randomized upper and lower bounds to clarify the exact improvement.
[Preliminaries] Notation for the bidding profile and the advice parameter should be introduced with a clear table or diagram showing how the profile interacts with the advice value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable feedback. The comments highlight important aspects of the bidding profile reduction and the DDE derivation that warrant clarification and strengthening in the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will incorporate revisions to make the arguments more explicit.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Bidding profile framework section] The section introducing the bidding profile framework and the reduction claim: the assertion that any randomized bidding algorithm (including those using learning-augmented advice) reduces without loss of generality to a bidding-profile-driven algorithm is load-bearing for the Pareto-optimality result. The proof must explicitly verify that the reduction preserves the full set of achievable robustness-consistency pairs and does not impose hidden restrictions on support or measurability of bid distributions.

Authors: We agree that the reduction is central to the result and that the current exposition would benefit from greater explicitness. In the revised manuscript, we will expand the proof to explicitly construct the mapping and its inverse, demonstrating that every achievable robustness-consistency pair for an arbitrary randomized algorithm is attained by the corresponding bidding-profile algorithm. We will also add a lemma confirming that the reduction preserves measurability and places no restrictions on the support of the bid distributions beyond those already present in the original algorithm. revision: yes
Referee: [DDE characterization section] The section deriving the DDE system: the optimality characterization via delayed differential equations must be shown to be derived from the underlying online bidding problem rather than being internal to the bidding-profile definition; otherwise the claimed Pareto optimality risks being tautological with respect to the framework.

Authors: We will revise the section to derive the DDE system directly from the underlying min-max optimization problem for the competitive ratio subject to the consistency constraint. Specifically, we will first formulate the problem of finding the optimal bidding profile as an infinite-dimensional optimization task over distributions, then obtain the necessary optimality conditions in the form of delayed differential equations by differentiating the competitive ratio with respect to the profile parameters and setting the variation to zero. This derivation relies on the structure of the online bidding instance (arrival times, value, and advice) rather than on properties internal to the profile representation itself. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected; derivation remains self-contained.

full rationale

The paper introduces the bidding-profile representation as a novel framework and asserts that any bidding algorithm reduces w.l.o.g. to one driven by such a profile, after which the optimal profile is characterized by solving a system of delayed differential equations. This reduction is presented as an independent structural lemma that preserves the algorithm's behavior, allowing the subsequent optimization step to operate on the reduced form. No equations or claims in the abstract or described chain show the DDE solution being equivalent to the profile definition by construction, nor is there evidence of fitted parameters renamed as predictions, self-citation load-bearing the central premise, or an ansatz smuggled via prior work. The derivation chain therefore does not collapse to its inputs; the framework enables a new characterization rather than presupposing the optimality result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the bidding profile reduction and the derivation of the DDE system from optimality conditions within that framework.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Any bidding algorithm can be reduced without loss of generality to one driven by a bidding profile.
Explicitly stated as a key step that enables the subsequent characterization.

invented entities (1)

bidding profile no independent evidence
purpose: A novel framework for representing the distribution over bids generated by an algorithm.
Introduced to enable the reduction and DDE characterization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5465 in / 1215 out tokens · 41281 ms · 2026-05-11T02:27:17.632342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Contract scheduling with distributional and multiple advice

Spyros Angelopoulos, Marcin Bienkowski, Christoph D \"u rr, and Bertrand Simon. Contract scheduling with distributional and multiple advice. In The 33rd International Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-24) , pages 3652--3660, 2024

work page 2024
[2]

Online computation with untrusted advice

Spyros Angelopoulos, Christoph D \"u rr, Shendan Jin, Shahin Kamali, and Marc Renault. Online computation with untrusted advice. Journal of Computer and System Sciences , 144:103545, 2024

work page 2024
[3]

A regression approach to learning-augmented online algorithms

Keerti Anand, Rong Ge, Amit Kumar, and Debmalya Panigrahi. A regression approach to learning-augmented online algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 34:30504--30517, 2021

work page 2021
[4]

Online search with a hint

Spyros Angelopoulos. Online search with a hint. Information and Computation , 295:105091, 2023

work page 2023
[5]

Online graph algorithms with predictions

Yossi Azar, Debmalya Panigrahi, and Noam Touitou. Online graph algorithms with predictions. In Proceedings of the 2022 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA) , pages 35--66. SIAM, 2022

work page 2022
[6]

Learning-augmented online bidding in stochastic settings

Spyros Angelopoulos and Bertrand Simon. Learning-augmented online bidding in stochastic settings. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2025

work page 2025
[7]

On the linear search problem

Anatole Beck. On the linear search problem. Israel Journal of Mathematics , 2(4):221--228, 1964

work page 1964
[8]

An optimal search

Richard Bellman. An optimal search. Siam Review , 5(3):274, 1963

work page 1963
[9]

Optimal stopping with a predicted prior.CoRR, abs/2511.03289,

Tian Bai, Zhiyi Huang, Chui Shan Lee, and Dongchen Li. Optimal stopping with a predicted prior. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.03289 , 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[10]

Beyond IID : Data-driven decision making in heterogeneous environments

Omar Besbes, Will Ma, and Omar Mouchtaki. Beyond IID : Data-driven decision making in heterogeneous environments. Management Science , 71(12):10538--10555, 2025

work page 2025
[11]

The primal-dual method for learning augmented algorithms

Etienne Bamas, Andreas Maggiori, and Ola Svensson. The primal-dual method for learning augmented algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 33:20083--20094, 2020

work page 2020
[12]

Yet more on the linear search problem

Anatole Beck and Donald J Newman. Yet more on the linear search problem. Israel journal of mathematics , 8(4):419--429, 1970

work page 1970
[13]

With a little help from my friends: Exploiting probability distribution advice in algorithm design

Cl \'e ment L Canonne, Kenny Chen, and Juli \'a n Mestre. With a little help from my friends: Exploiting probability distribution advice in algorithm design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.04949 , 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

Ski rental with distributional predictions of unknown quality

Qiming Cui and Michael Dinitz. Ski rental with distributional predictions of unknown quality. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.21104 , 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[15]

Learning-augmented online bipartite fractional matching

Davin Choo, Billy Jin, and Yongho Shin. Learning-augmented online bipartite fractional matching. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 2025

work page 2025
[16]

Sigact news online algorithms column 10: Competitiveness via doubling

Marek Chrobak and Claire Kenyon-Mathieu. Sigact news online algorithms column 10: Competitiveness via doubling. ACM SIGACT News , 37(4):115--126, 2006

work page 2006
[17]

Incremental medians via online bidding

Marek Chrobak, Claire Kenyon, John Noga, and Neal E Young. Incremental medians via online bidding. Algorithmica , 50(4):455--478, 2008

work page 2008
[18]

Online searching with turn cost

Erik D Demaine, S \'a ndor P Fekete, and Shmuel Gal. Online searching with turn cost. Theoretical computer science , 361(2-3):342--355, 2006

work page 2006
[19]

Binary search with distributional predictions

Michael Dinitz, Sungjin Im, Thomas Lavastida, Benjamin Moseley, Aidin Niaparast, and Sergei Vassilvitskii. Binary search with distributional predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37:90456--90472, 2024

work page 2024
[20]

The Pareto Frontier of Randomized Learning-Augmented Online Bidding

Mathis Degryse, Imrane Zaakour, Christoph D \"u rr, and Spyros Angelopoulos. The pareto frontier of randomized learning-augmented online bidding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.06106 , 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[21]

Overcoming brittleness in pareto-optimal learning augmented algorithms

Alex Elenter, Spyros Angelopoulos, Christoph D \"u rr, and Yanni Lefki. Overcoming brittleness in pareto-optimal learning augmented algorithms. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 37:9329--9357, 2024

work page 2024
[22]

Online state exploration: Competitive worst case and learning-augmented algorithms

Sungjin Im, Benjamin Moseley, Chenyang Xu, and Ruilong Zhang. Online state exploration: Competitive worst case and learning-augmented algorithms. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases , pages 333--348. Springer, 2023

work page 2023
[23]

Robust and consistent ski rental with distributional advice

Jihwan Kim and Chenglin Fan. Robust and consistent ski rental with distributional advice. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.29233 , 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[24]

Prophet and secretary at the same time

Gregory Kehne and Thomas Kesselheim. Prophet and secretary at the same time. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.09531 , 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

A survey of the impact of knowledge on the competitive ratio in linear search

Evangelos Kranakis. A survey of the impact of knowledge on the competitive ratio in linear search. In International Symposium on Stabilizing, Safety, and Security of Distributed Systems , pages 23--38. Springer, 2024

work page 2024
[26]

Anytime motion planning using the RRT

Sertac Karaman, Matthew R Walter, Alejandro Perez, Emilio Frazzoli, and Seth Teller. Anytime motion planning using the RRT . In 2011 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation , pages 1478--1483. ieee, 2011

work page 2011
[27]

Optimal scheduling of contract algorithms for anytime problem-solving

Alejandro L \'o pez-Ortiz, Spyros Angelopoulos, and Angele M Hamel. Optimal scheduling of contract algorithms for anytime problem-solving. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 51:533--554, 2014

work page 2014
[28]

Competitive caching with machine learned advice

Thodoris Lykouris and Sergei Vassilvitskii. Competitive caching with machine learned advice. Journal of the ACM (JACM) , 68(4):1--25, 2021

work page 2021
[29]

Algorithms with predictions

Michael Mitzenmacher and Sergei Vassilvitskii. Algorithms with predictions. Communications of the ACM , 65(7):33--35, 2022

work page 2022
[30]

Improving online algorithms via ML predictions

Manish Purohit, Zoya Svitkina, and Ravi Kumar. Improving online algorithms via ML predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 31, 2018

work page 2018
[31]

Composing real-time systems

Stuart J Russell and Shlomo Zilberstein. Composing real-time systems. In IJCAI , volume 91, pages 212--217, 1991

work page 1991
[32]

Improved learning-augmented algorithms and (tight) lower bounds for multi-option ski rental problem

Yongho Shin, Changyeol Lee, Gukryeol Lee, and Hyung-Chan An. Improved learning-augmented algorithms and (tight) lower bounds for multi-option ski rental problem. ACM Trans. Algorithms , 22(1), November 2025

work page 2025
[33]

Using anytime algorithms in intelligent systems

Shlomo Zilberstein. Using anytime algorithms in intelligent systems. AI magazine , 17(3):73--73, 1996

work page 1996