arxiv: 2605.07365 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

Solving Convolution-type Integral Equations using Preconditioned Neural Operators

Raymond Chan , Lingfeng Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA

keywords neural operatorsconvolution integral equationspreconditioninghigh-frequency residualshybrid iterative methodsweighted Jacobi iterationgeneralization errornumerical linear algebra

0 comments

The pith

Preconditioned neural operators combined with weighted Jacobi iteration solve large convolution integral equations faster than multigrid or conjugate gradient methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Convolution integral equations produce linear systems where standard iterative solvers like multigrid handle smooth error components well but stall on high-frequency oscillations. The paper trains a neural operator on preconditioned residuals that isolate those high-frequency parts, then embeds the trained operator inside a classical iteration loop. This hybrid scheme is shown to converge in far fewer steps on large, ill-conditioned one- and two-dimensional discretizations while preserving the generalization guarantees derived for the training strategy. The authors prove both the generalization error bound for the neural component and the overall convergence rate of the combined algorithm. Numerical tests confirm the method uses fewer iterations and less wall-clock time than either multigrid or preconditioned conjugate gradient on representative signal-processing and deblurring problems.

Core claim

By training a neural operator exclusively on the high-frequency residual after a simple diagonal preconditioner is applied, and then using that operator as an accelerator inside a weighted Jacobi iteration, the resulting hybrid solver converges rapidly on large-scale convolution-type integral equations that defeat conventional multigrid and PCG approaches.

What carries the argument

Preconditioned neural operator that approximates the action of the high-frequency inverse of the convolution kernel, inserted as a correction step inside a classical weighted Jacobi iteration.

If this is right

The same training strategy yields a provably convergent method for any convolution kernel whose symbol admits a stable high-frequency splitting.
Iteration count becomes essentially independent of mesh size once the neural operator is fixed.
The approach extends directly to periodic boundary conditions and to kernels that arise in FIR filtering or image deblurring.
Computational cost per iteration scales linearly with the number of grid points, matching the cost of a single matrix-vector product with the convolution kernel.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same high-frequency neural correction could be inserted into other Krylov methods or into domain-decomposition schemes for non-convolution integral operators.
If the training set is generated from random smooth right-hand sides, the resulting operator may also accelerate related deconvolution problems in statistics or geophysics.
Because the neural component is trained once and reused, the method offers a practical route to real-time solvers for time-dependent convolution models.

Load-bearing premise

The neural operator, once trained on small preconditioned high-frequency residuals, continues to produce accurate corrections for arbitrarily large and ill-conditioned convolution systems without retraining.

What would settle it

Run the hybrid algorithm on a 1024-by-1024 discretization of a 2-D convolution equation whose condition number exceeds 10^6 and measure whether iteration count or runtime still beats multigrid by at least a factor of two.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07365 by Lingfeng Li, Raymond Chan.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) and (b) shows the prediction Nθ(y0) after different numbers of training epochs when Pn = An and Pn = C(An) −1 respectively. Here, the blue curves represent x0 and the orange curves represent Nθ(y0). (a) Pn = An (b) Pn = C(An)−1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (a) and (b) show the Fourier magnitude spectra of the error after different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Figures of Fi(θ τ )/Fi(θ 0 ), τ = 0, 1, . . . , during training for different choices of a. 5. Numerical experiments. 5.1. Training setting. The training of all neural operators in this section is conducted on the NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU with 48 GB of memory. For one-dimensional problems, we train the neural operators for 1,000 epochs with a learning rate of 10−4 and a batch size of 100. For two-dimensional … view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Training process of one batch deviation of the Gaussian kernel to be 1.5. Then An is a Toeplitz matrix. During training, we define Pn = (α+1)In−An in the loss function (3.1). Since the sum of each row of Kn is less than or equal to 1, the maximum eigenvalue of Kn is less than 1, which is guaranteed by the Gershgorin circle theorem [17]. Then, the maximum eigenvalue of An is less than 1 + α. During the eval… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: The magnitude spectra from our proposed method and the two-grid method. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The magnitude spectra from the proposed method and the multigrid method. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: The structure of Fourier neural operators [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Convolution-type integral equations arise from various fields, \textit{e.g.}, finite impulse response filters in signal processing and deblurring problems in image processing. When solving these equations, conventional numerical methods, like the multigrid method, can only efficiently solve the low-frequency components in the error, but not the high-frequency components. In this paper, we apply neural operators to address this issue. By adopting a preconditioning approach, we propose a novel training strategy that trains neural operators to solve the high-frequency components efficiently. Then, we combine the neural operators with some classical iterative solvers, like the weighted Jacobi method, to obtain an efficient hybrid iterative algorithm for the integral equations. We analyze the generalization error of our training strategy and the convergence of the hybrid iterative algorithm. We test our algorithms on large-scale and ill-conditioned linear systems discretized from one- and two-dimensional convolution-type integral equations. Our proposed algorithm significantly outperforms the multigrid method and the preconditioned conjugate gradient method in both iteration numbers and computational time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper trains a neural operator on high-frequency residuals after a weighted Jacobi step to accelerate solvers for convolution equations, with solid experiments but thin generalization support.

read the letter

The core of this paper is a hybrid iteration: apply a classical weighted Jacobi smoother, then use a neural operator trained specifically on the remaining high-frequency residual to produce a correction for discretized convolution integral equations. They embed this inside an outer loop and compare against multigrid and PCG on large 1D and 2D problems. The training strategy that isolates high frequencies is the clearest new piece; most neural-operator work trains on full residuals or solutions, so directing the network at the part classical smoothers miss is a targeted choice. They also supply an analysis of generalization error for the training strategy and a convergence argument for the combined scheme, plus numerical runs that report fewer iterations and lower wall-clock time on ill-conditioned test cases. That practical evidence is the strongest element. The soft spot is generalization. The operator must map residuals accurately for kernels and grid sizes outside the training distribution, especially as condition numbers increase. The paper states it analyzes this error, yet the bounds appear to rest on uniform assumptions about frequency separation and the kernel symbol that may not stay independent of the problem parameters. If those assumptions loosen on new Toeplitz symbols, the iteration count gains could shrink or vanish. The numerical tests are on specific examples, so they do not fully close the gap. This work is aimed at numerical analysts working on integral equations in imaging or signal processing who already consider neural operators or multigrid hybrids. A reader focused on practical acceleration for large convolution systems would extract value from the experiments and the hybrid construction. It deserves a serious referee because the idea is coherent, the claims are testable, and the performance numbers are concrete even if the theory needs tightening on the generalization side. I would send it out for review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a hybrid iterative solver for convolution-type integral equations that trains a neural operator on high-frequency residuals after a classical smoother (weighted Jacobi) and embeds it inside an outer iteration. It claims to analyze the generalization error of this training strategy and the convergence of the resulting algorithm, then reports numerical tests on large-scale, ill-conditioned 1-D and 2-D discretizations where the hybrid method outperforms multigrid and preconditioned conjugate gradient in both iteration count and wall-clock time.

Significance. If the claimed generalization bounds hold uniformly over kernel symbols and grid sizes, the approach would supply a practical way to accelerate high-frequency error reduction in Toeplitz systems that arise in signal processing and image deblurring, while retaining the low-frequency handling of classical smoothers. The explicit analysis of generalization error and convergence is a positive feature that distinguishes the work from purely empirical neural-operator papers.

major comments (2)

[Generalization error analysis] Generalization-error analysis (the section following the training strategy): the stated uniform bounds over the operator family are not shown to be independent of the condition number of the discretized convolution operator or of the particular symbol of the kernel. Because the numerical tests emphasize precisely the ill-conditioned regime, this independence is load-bearing for the outperformance claim; without it the hybrid iteration may stall on unseen large-scale instances.
[Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments section, Tables/Figures reporting iteration counts and timings: the training set is generated from specific residuals after the weighted Jacobi smoother, yet no ablation or cross-validation is reported for kernels or grid sizes outside the training distribution. The central claim that the preconditioned neural operator generalizes accurately to arbitrary large-scale ill-conditioned systems therefore rests on unverified extrapolation.

minor comments (2)

[Algorithm description] Notation for the neural operator input (preconditioned residual) and output (correction) should be introduced with a single consistent symbol rather than varying between the training description and the algorithm pseudocode.
[Introduction] The abstract states that 'generalization error and convergence are analyzed,' but the manuscript would benefit from a short remark in the introduction clarifying which classical results (e.g., on neural-operator approximation) are invoked versus which new bounds are derived.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive comments on the generalization analysis and numerical validation. We address each major comment below and outline revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Generalization error analysis] Generalization-error analysis (the section following the training strategy): the stated uniform bounds over the operator family are not shown to be independent of the condition number of the discretized convolution operator or of the particular symbol of the kernel. Because the numerical tests emphasize precisely the ill-conditioned regime, this independence is load-bearing for the outperformance claim; without it the hybrid iteration may stall on unseen large-scale instances.

Authors: We appreciate this observation. The generalization bounds are established for a family of kernels whose symbols satisfy bounded-variation and regularity assumptions that implicitly control the high-frequency behavior targeted by the neural operator; uniformity holds within that class. The analysis does not claim full independence from the condition number for arbitrary symbols, as the low-frequency component is handled by the outer weighted Jacobi iteration. We will revise the relevant section to state the assumptions more explicitly, add a remark clarifying the separation of high- and low-frequency handling, and include a brief discussion of how the preconditioner mitigates dependence on the symbol for the error components it is trained to correct. These clarifications will be accompanied by a note that the outperformance claims in the ill-conditioned regime rest on both the theory under the stated assumptions and the reported numerical evidence. revision: partial
Referee: [Numerical experiments] Numerical experiments section, Tables/Figures reporting iteration counts and timings: the training set is generated from specific residuals after the weighted Jacobi smoother, yet no ablation or cross-validation is reported for kernels or grid sizes outside the training distribution. The central claim that the preconditioned neural operator generalizes accurately to arbitrary large-scale ill-conditioned systems therefore rests on unverified extrapolation.

Authors: We agree that explicit ablation and cross-validation on out-of-distribution kernels and grids would provide stronger empirical support for generalization. The existing tests already include 1-D and 2-D problems with varying grid sizes and condition numbers, but we did not report separate hold-out experiments on entirely unseen kernel symbols. We will add an appendix containing additional numerical results: (i) tests on kernels whose symbols differ from those used in training (e.g., different decay rates), and (ii) runs on grid sizes larger than the training distribution. These will be presented with iteration counts and timings to document the observed extrapolation behavior. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on external approximation theory and classical convergence results.

full rationale

The paper's core claims rest on training a neural operator for high-frequency residuals (standard neural-operator approximation theory) combined with classical smoothers like weighted Jacobi, followed by separate analysis of generalization error and hybrid iteration convergence. No load-bearing step reduces by definition or self-citation to a fitted quantity inside the paper; the outperformance is presented as an empirical and theoretical consequence of the hybrid scheme rather than a tautology. Self-citations, if present, are not required to justify the central premises.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that neural operators can be trained to approximate high-frequency error operators for convolution kernels and that the hybrid iteration converges under standard spectral-radius conditions.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Neural operators can be trained to accurately represent the high-frequency component of the residual operator for convolution-type kernels.
This is the key premise enabling the preconditioning step described in the abstract.
standard math The weighted Jacobi iteration combined with the learned correction satisfies a contraction mapping or spectral-radius bound less than one.
Invoked when claiming convergence of the hybrid algorithm.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5465 in / 1320 out tokens · 47353 ms · 2026-05-11T02:20:04.495066+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

13 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

[1]

20 [1]G. S. Ammar and W. B. Gragg,Superfast solution of real positive definite Toeplitz systems, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 9 (1988), pp. 61–76. [2]A. Beck and M. Teboulle,A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algorithm for linear inverse problems, SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2 (2009), pp. 183–202. [3]J.-M. Bergheau and R. F...

work page 1988
[2]

[4]R. R. Bitmead and B. D. Anderson,Asymptotically fast solution of Toeplitz and related systems of linear equations, Linear Algebra and its Applications, 34 (1980), pp. 103–116. [5]W. L. Briggs, V. E. Henson, and S. F. McCormick,A multigrid tutorial, SIAM,

work page 1980
[3]

[6]Y. Cao, Z. F ang, Y. Wu, D.-X. Zhou, and Q. Gu,Towards understanding the spectral bias of deep learning, in 30th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2021), International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, 2021, pp. 2205–2211. [7]R. Chan, T. F. Chan, and W. W an,Multigrid for differential-convolution problems aris...

work page 2021
[4]

[10]R. H. Chan and X.-Q. Jin,A family of block preconditioners for block systems, SIAM Journal on Scientific and Statistical Computing, 13 (1992), pp. 1218–1235. [11]R. H. Chan and M. K. Ng,Conjugate gradient methods for Toeplitz systems, SIAM Review, 38 (1996), pp. 427–482. [12]R. H. Chan and M.-C. Yeung,Circulant preconditioners constructed from kernels...

work page 1992
[5]

Goswami, M

[18]S. Goswami, M. Yin, Y. Yu, and G. E. Karniadakis,A physics-informed variational deep- onet for predicting crack path in quasi-brittle materials, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 391 (2022), p. 114587. [19]U. Grenander,Toeplitz forms and their applications, California Monographs in Mathematical Sciences/University of California Pr...

work page 2022
[6]

Hu and P

[23]J. Hu and P. Jin,A hybrid iterative method based on MIONet for pdes: Theory and numerical examples, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.07156, (2024). [24]R. Huang, R. Li, and Y. Xi,Learning optimal multigrid smoothers via neural networks, SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 45 (2022), pp. S199–S225. [25]R. King, M. Ahmadi, R. Gorgui-Naguib, A. Kwabwe, and M....

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

[26]S. M. Kwerel,Bounds on the probability of the union and intersection of m events, Advances in Applied Probability, 7 (1975), pp. 431–448. [27]M. Ledoux and M. Talagrand,Probability in Banach Spaces: Isoperimetry and processes, Springer Science & Business Media,

work page 1975
[8]

Li, X.-C

[28]L. Li, X.-C. Tai, J. Yang, and Q. Zhu,A priori error estimate of deep mixed residual method for elliptic PDEs, Journal of Scientific Computing, 98 (2024), p

work page 2024
[9]

[29]Z. Li, N. B. Kovachki, K. Azizzadenesheli, B. liu, K. Bhattacharya, A. Stuart, and A. Anandkumar,Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations, in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2021, https://openreview.net/ R. CHAN AND L. LI21 forum?id=c8P9NQVtmnO. [30]Z. Li, H. Zheng, N. Kovachki, D. Jin, H. Chen, B. Li...

work page doi:10.1145/3648506 2021
[10]

[32]S. Liu, C. Su, J. Yao, Z. Hao, H. Su, Y. Wu, and J. Zhu,Preconditioning for physics- informed neural networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00531, (2024). [33]L. Lu, P. Jin, G. Pang, Z. Zhang, and G. E. Karniadakis,Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators, Nature Machine Intelligence, 3 (2021), p...

work page arXiv 2024
[11]

Rahaman, A

[37]N. Rahaman, A. Baratin, D. Arpit, F. Draxler, M. Lin, F. Hamprecht, Y. Bengio, and A. Courville,On the spectral bias of neural networks, in International conference on machine learning, PMLR, 2019, pp. 5301–5310. [38]O. Ronneberger, P. Fischer, and T. Brox,U-Net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation, in Procedings of Medical Image ...

work page 2019
[12]

[39]J. W. Ruge and K. St ¨uben,Algebraic multigrid, in Multigrid Methods, SIAM, 1987, pp. 73–

work page 1987
[13]

[41]S. Song, T. Mukerji, and D. Zhang,Physics-informed multi-grid neural operator: theory and an application to porous flow simulation, Journal of Computational Physics, 520 (2025), p. 113438. [42]H.-W. Sun, R. H. Chan, and Q.-S. Chang,A note on the convergence of the two-grid method for Toeplitz systems, Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 34 (199...

work page doi:10.1038/s42256-024-00910-x 2025