arxiv: 2605.07416 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Effective Gilbert damping in the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation

Mexx. E.Y. Regout , Bertrand Dup\'e , Matthieu J. Verstraete

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

keywords effective Gilbert dampingstochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbertspin wavesdynamical structure factor1D spin chaintemperature dependencemagnon scatteringcrystal momentum

0 comments

The pith

In stochastic simulations of a 1D spin chain the effective Gilbert damping extracted from spin waves deviates from the constant input value and acquires temperature and momentum dependence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The work propagates spin trajectories with the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation on a one-dimensional chain, using a fixed microscopic Gilbert damping parameter. Dynamical correlation functions are computed from these trajectories and the dynamical structure factor is fitted to obtain spin-wave dispersion relations and scattering rates over a range of temperatures. The ratio of scattering rate to frequency defines an effective damping that differs substantially from the input constant. The deviations are traced to spin-wave interactions with the thermal bath and to scattering off fluctuations in the local magnetic order. Transport models that assume a simple linear relation between damping and frequency will therefore need revision once these effects are included.

Core claim

When the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with constant Gilbert damping is solved for a 1D spin chain, the effective damping obtained by fitting the dynamical structure factor to extract the scattering rate η and forming α_eff,T = η/ω is no longer constant. It displays clear temperature and crystal-momentum scaling that arises from the combined action of the Gilbert bath and spin-wave scattering by local magnetic-order fluctuations.

What carries the argument

Fitting the dynamical structure factor computed from finite-length stochastic trajectories to isolate the intrinsic scattering rate η, then defining effective damping as η divided by spin-wave frequency.

Load-bearing premise

The fitting window and functional form applied to the dynamical structure factor from finite trajectories separate the intrinsic scattering rate from finite-size and discretization artifacts.

What would settle it

A simulation or measurement in which the extracted effective damping remains exactly equal to the input Gilbert value at all temperatures and all crystal momenta would contradict the reported scaling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07416 by Bertrand Dup\'e, Matthieu J. Verstraete, Mexx. E.Y. Regout.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Averaged dynamical structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Averaged dynamical structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Temperature dependent dispersions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6. Temperature dependent scattering rates ¯η [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Temperature dependent effective Gilbert damping [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Negative frequency intensity in the averaged dynam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Averaged dynamical structure factor at a tempera [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Quasi particle based (e.g. Boltzmann equation) studies of spin wave transport often assume that their scattering rates follow the simple form $\eta=\alpha \omega$, with the Gilbert damping $\alpha$ and frequency $\omega$. In this work, we examine the effective damping $\alpha_{eff,T}=\eta/\omega$ observed in atomistic spin dynamics, when temperature and spin wave interactions are introduced for a 1D spin chain. We extract the dynamical correlation functions from spin trajectories propagated using the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation, and fit the dynamical structure factor, yielding the dispersion and scattering rates for a wide range of temperatures. The resulting effective damping can be very different from the initially constant Gilbert value. It exhibits a temperature and crystal momentum scaling which we explain based on interactions with the Gilbert bath and spin wave scattering by changes in local magnetic order.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows that effective damping extracted from stochastic LLG in a 1D chain deviates from constant Gilbert α and scales with T and q, but the numerical extraction may mix in finite-size and fitting artifacts.

read the letter

The main point is that constant-α assumptions in quasi-particle spin-wave models do not hold in their atomistic 1D simulations once temperature and interactions are turned on. They run stochastic LLG trajectories, compute the dynamical structure factor, fit Lorentzians to extract linewidths η(q,T), and report α_eff = η/ω that grows with temperature and varies with momentum, which they trace to Gilbert-bath coupling plus scattering off local-order fluctuations. This is a direct numerical check on a standard modeling shortcut, and the scaling relations they extract are the concrete new output. The workflow itself is standard and cleanly executed for what it is: no circular fitting, just propagation followed by correlation analysis. That part is solid and worth having on record for people who build Boltzmann or kinetic models of magnons. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress test. In a 1D chain the dispersion is linear at small q, so periodic boundaries, finite length, and integrator timestep can broaden the peaks in S(q,ω) in ways that look like extra damping. The abstract gives no numbers on system-size scaling, fit residuals, or timestep convergence, so it is not yet clear whether the reported T and q dependence survives those checks or partly reflects them. If the full paper shows clean convergence and error bars that are smaller than the claimed effects, the result strengthens; if not, the physical story needs more work. This is useful for anyone doing thermal spin-wave transport calculations in low-dimensional or atomistic settings. It flags a correction that standard treatments may need, even if the 1D case is the simplest possible testbed. I would send it to referees because the question is practical and the method is reproducible; the numerics just need to be tightened in revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper studies effective Gilbert damping in a 1D spin chain governed by the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation. Spin trajectories are generated numerically at finite temperature; the dynamical structure factor S(q,ω) is extracted and fitted to obtain dispersion and scattering rates η. The resulting α_eff,T = η/ω is shown to deviate from the input constant Gilbert damping α, with reported temperature and crystal-momentum scaling attributed to Gilbert-bath interactions and spin-wave scattering off local magnetic-order fluctuations.

Significance. If the extracted η values are free of numerical artifacts, the result would challenge the common assumption in quasi-particle (Boltzmann-equation) treatments that spin-wave scattering rates follow the simple form η = α ω. It supplies a concrete 1D example in which thermal effects and spin-wave interactions renormalize the effective damping, with potential implications for magnon transport modeling in low-dimensional magnets.

major comments (2)

[Numerical extraction and fitting procedure (results section)] The headline claim that α_eff deviates strongly from the input α and exhibits distinct T and q scaling rests entirely on Lorentzian fits to S(q,ω) obtained from finite-length stochastic trajectories. The manuscript supplies no quantitative information on fit quality, error bars on η, system-size convergence (especially relevant for the linear small-q dispersion in 1D), or explicit validation against the zero-temperature limit where α_eff must recover the input Gilbert value. Without these controls, finite-size quantization, periodic-boundary broadening, or integrator discretization noise cannot be ruled out as sources of the reported linewidths.
[Discussion of temperature and momentum scaling] In a 1D chain the spin-wave dispersion is linear at small q, so any residual finite-size or timestep dependence in the fitted linewidths would produce apparent η values that scale with system parameters rather than with intrinsic Gilbert-bath scattering. The paper does not demonstrate that such artifacts are smaller than the claimed temperature-induced changes, undermining the physical interpretation offered in the discussion.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states that trajectories are propagated 'for a wide range of temperatures' but does not specify the temperature window, the lattice sizes employed, or the integration timestep used in the stochastic LLG solver.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of the numerical methodology and the robustness of the scaling analysis. We address each point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional validations and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Numerical extraction and fitting procedure (results section)] The headline claim that α_eff deviates strongly from the input α and exhibits distinct T and q scaling rests entirely on Lorentzian fits to S(q,ω) obtained from finite-length stochastic trajectories. The manuscript supplies no quantitative information on fit quality, error bars on η, system-size convergence (especially relevant for the linear small-q dispersion in 1D), or explicit validation against the zero-temperature limit where α_eff must recover the input Gilbert value. Without these controls, finite-size quantization, periodic-boundary broadening, or integrator discretization noise cannot be ruled out as sources of the reported linewidths.

Authors: We agree that quantitative controls on the fitting procedure are necessary to substantiate the claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a dedicated paragraph in the Results section describing the Lorentzian fitting protocol, including reduced χ² values (typically 1.1–1.4 across the data set), error bars on η obtained from 50–100 independent stochastic trajectories, and explicit system-size convergence tests for N = 128 to 1024. We have also included a zero-temperature benchmark showing that the extracted α_eff recovers the input Gilbert value to within numerical precision (deviation < 3 %) for all accessible q. These additions demonstrate that the reported finite-T deviations and scaling are not attributable to the numerical artifacts mentioned. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion of temperature and momentum scaling] In a 1D chain the spin-wave dispersion is linear at small q, so any residual finite-size or timestep dependence in the fitted linewidths would produce apparent η values that scale with system parameters rather than with intrinsic Gilbert-bath scattering. The paper does not demonstrate that such artifacts are smaller than the claimed temperature-induced changes, undermining the physical interpretation offered in the discussion.

Authors: We acknowledge the concern that linear dispersion in 1D can amplify apparent scaling from residual numerical effects. To address this we have performed additional runs with halved timesteps and doubled system sizes; the temperature-induced variation in α_eff remains at least a factor of three larger than any changes induced by these numerical parameters. We have added a short paragraph in the Discussion section that contrasts the observed q- and T-dependence (stronger enhancement at small q and higher T) with the expected signature of finite-size broadening, which would be largely T-independent. This supports the physical origin in Gilbert-bath coupling and scattering from local-order fluctuations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: effective damping extracted via direct simulation and fitting

full rationale

The paper propagates trajectories with the stochastic LLG equation using a fixed input Gilbert damping α, computes dynamical correlation functions, fits the structure factor S(q,ω) to extract scattering rate η and frequency ω, and reports α_eff = η/ω. This is a post-processing measurement of emergent quantities from the integrated dynamics; the output is not presupposed in the input equations or obtained by reusing a fitted parameter as a prediction. No self-definitional steps, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear in the described method. The derivation chain is self-contained numerical observation rather than algebraic reduction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert dynamics and on the assumption that structure-factor fitting yields reliable scattering rates; no additional free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation with additive white noise correctly captures the finite-temperature dynamics of classical spins.
This is the equation whose trajectories are propagated and from which all correlation functions are derived.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1247 out tokens · 53146 ms · 2026-05-11T01:45:03.701365+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We extract the dynamical correlation functions from spin trajectories propagated using the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation, and fit the dynamical structure factor, yielding the dispersion and scattering rates... η_T(q)=α_T ω_T(q)+β_T sqrt(1-cos(qa))
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The resulting effective damping can be very different from the initially constant Gilbert value. It exhibits a temperature and crystal momentum scaling

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Effective Gilbert damping in the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation

and laser-induced demagnetization [19], and can vary significantly. Nevertheless, in the LLG equation, a sin- gle damping parameterαsummarizes the dissipation of energy via different channels [20]. Although this param- eter is usually obtained phenomenologically, it can be computed based on a tight-binding Hamiltonian [21, 22], Time Dependent Density Func...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[2]

A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands. Magnon spintronics.Nature physics, 11(6):453–461, June 2015

work page 2015
[3]

A. A. Serga, A. V. Chumak, and B. Hillebrands. YIG magnonics.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 43(26):264002, July 2010

work page 2010
[4]

A. S. Borovik-Romanov and N. M. Kreines. Brillouin- mandelstam scattering from thermal and excited magnons.Physics Reports, 81(5):351–408, January 1982

work page 1982
[5]

Magnon spectrum of altermagnets be- yond linear spin wave theory: Magnon-magnon inter- actions via time-dependent matrix product states ver- sus atomistic spin dynamics.Phys

F.Garcia-Gaitan. Magnon spectrum of altermagnets be- yond linear spin wave theory: Magnon-magnon inter- actions via time-dependent matrix product states ver- sus atomistic spin dynamics.Phys. Rev. B.111.L020407, 2025

work page 2025
[6]

Rezende.Fundamentals of Magnonics

S.M. Rezende.Fundamentals of Magnonics. Springer Cham, 2020

work page 2020
[7]

T.L. Gilbert. A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materials.IEEE transactions on magnet- ics, 40(6):3443–3449, November 2004

work page 2004
[8]

Writ- ing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions.Science, 341(6146):636–639, 2013

Niklas Romming, Christian Hanneken, Matthias Menzel, Jessica E Bickel, Boris Wolter, Kirsten von Bergmann, Andr´ e Kubetzka, and Roland Wiesendanger. Writ- ing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions.Science, 341(6146):636–639, 2013

work page 2013
[9]

Tailoring magnetic skyrmions in ultra- thin transition metal films.Nature communications, 5(May):4030, June 2014

Bertrand Dup´ e, Markus Hoffmann, Charles Paillard, and Stefan Heinze. Tailoring magnetic skyrmions in ultra- thin transition metal films.Nature communications, 5(May):4030, June 2014

work page 2014
[10]

Observation of fluctuation-mediated picosec- ond nucleation of a topological phase.Nature materials, 20(1):30–37, January 2021

Felix B¨ uttner, Bastian Pfau, Marie B¨ ottcher, Michael Schneider, Giuseppe Mercurio, Christian M G¨ unther, Piet Hessing, Christopher Klose, Angela Wittmann, Ka- thinka Gerlinger, Lisa-Marie Kern, Christian Str¨ uber, Clemens von Korff Schmising, Josefin Fuchs, Dieter En- gel, Alexandra Churikova, Siying Huang, Daniel Suzuki, Ivan Lemesh, Mantao Huang, ...

work page 2021
[11]

Propagation of thermally induced magnonic spin cur- rents.Phys

Ulrike Ritzmann, Denise Hinzke, and Ulrich Nowak. Propagation of thermally induced magnonic spin cur- rents.Phys. Rev. B, 89:024409, Jan 2014

work page 2014
[12]

Hinzke, U

R.F.L Evans, D. Hinzke, U. Atxitia, U. Nowak, R. W. Chantrell, and O. Chubykalo-Fesenko. Stochastic form of the landau-lifshitz-bloch equation.Physical Review. B, Condensed Matter, 85:014433, January 2012

work page 2012
[13]

Magnetic field control of the spin seebeck effect.Phys

Ulrike Ritzmann, Denise Hinzke, Andreas Kehlberger, Er-Jia Guo, Mathias Kl¨ aui, and Ulrich Nowak. Magnetic field control of the spin seebeck effect.Phys. Rev. B, 92:174411, Nov 2015

work page 2015
[14]

Tro- choidal motion and pair generation in skyrmion and an- tiskyrmion dynamics under spin–orbit torques.Nature Electronics, 1(8):451–457, August 2018

Ulrike Ritzmann, Stephan von Malottki, Joo-Von Kim, Stefan Heinze, Jairo Sinova, and Bertrand Dup´ e. Tro- choidal motion and pair generation in skyrmion and an- tiskyrmion dynamics under spin–orbit torques.Nature Electronics, 1(8):451–457, August 2018

work page 2018
[15]

The microscopic model of BiFeO 3.Phys- ica

R S Fishman. The microscopic model of BiFeO 3.Phys- ica. B, Condensed matter, 536(September 2017):115–117, May 2018

work page 2017
[16]

Systematic deriva- tion of realistic spin models for beyond-heisenberg solids

Markus Hoffmann and Stefan Bl¨ ugel. Systematic deriva- tion of realistic spin models for beyond-heisenberg solids. Physical Review. B, 101(2), January 2020

work page 2020
[17]

Liechtenstein, M.I

A.I. Liechtenstein, M.I. Katsnelson, V.P. Antropov, and V.A. Gubanov. Local spin density functional approach to the theory of exchange interactions in ferromagnetic metals and alloys.Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 67(1):65 – 74, 1987

work page 1987
[18]

Azzawi, A

S. Azzawi, A. T. Hindmarch, and D. Atkinson. Mag- netic damping phenomena in ferromagnetic thin-films and multilayers.Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 50(47):473001, November 2017

work page 2017
[19]

Usami, M

T. Usami, M. Itoh, and T. Taniyama. Temperature de- pendence of the effective gilbert damping constant of ferh thin films.AIP Advances 11, 045302, 2021

work page 2021
[20]

Mondal and A

S. Mondal and A. Barman. Laser controlled spin dy- namics of ferromagnetic thin film from femtosecond to nanosecond timescale.Phys. Rev. B 10, 054037, 2018

work page 2018
[21]

H. Suhl. Theory of the magnetic damping constant.IEEE transactions on magnetics, 34(4):1834–1838, July 1998

work page 1998
[22]

Starikov, Paul J

Anton A. Starikov, Paul J. Kelly, Arne Brataas, Yaroslav Tserkovnyak, and Gerrit E. W. Bauer. Unified first- principles study of gilbert damping, spin-flip diffusion, and resistivity in transition metal alloys.Physical review letters, 105(23):236601, December 2010

work page 2010
[23]

Frank Freimuth, Stefan Bl¨ ugel, and Yuriy Mokrousov. Chiral damping, chiral gyromagnetism, and current- induced torques in textured one-dimensional rashba fer- romagnets.Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 96(10):104418, September 2017

work page 2017
[24]

Capelle and B

K. Capelle and B. L. Gyorffy. Exploring dynamical mag- netism with time-dependent density-functional theory: From spin fluctuations to gilbert damping.Europhysics Letters, 61(3):354, feb 2003

work page 2003
[25]

Sandratskii

Pawe l Buczek, Arthur Ernst, and Leonid M. Sandratskii. Different dimensionality trends in the landau damping of magnons in iron, cobalt, and nickel: Time-dependent density functional study.Phys. Rev. B, 84:174418, Nov 2011

work page 2011
[26]

Ebert, S

H. Ebert, S. Mankovsky, D. K¨ odderitzsch, and P. J. Kelly. Ab initio calculation of the gilbert damping pa- rameter via the linear response formalism.Phys. Rev. Lett., 107:066603, Aug 2011

work page 2011
[27]

Lounis, A

S. Lounis, A. T. Costa, R. B. Muniz, and D. L. Mills. Theory of local dynamical magnetic susceptibilities from the korringa-kohn-rostoker green function method.Phys. Rev. B, 83:035109, Jan 2011

work page 2011
[28]

Atomistic simulation of phonon and magnon thermal transport across the ferromagnetic-paramagnetic transition.Physical Review

Yanguang Zhou, Julien Tranchida, Yijun Ge, Jayathi Murthy, and Timothy S Fisher. Atomistic simulation of phonon and magnon thermal transport across the ferromagnetic-paramagnetic transition.Physical Review. B, 101(22), June 2020

work page 2020
[29]

X. Wu, Z. Liu, and T. Luo. Magnon and phonon dis- persion, lifetime, and thermal conductivity of iron from spin-lattice dynamics simulations.J. Appl. Phys. 123, 085109, 2018. 13

work page 2018
[30]

Castellano, K

A. Castellano, K. Alhada-Lahbabi, J. A. Arregi, V. Uhl˜ ır, B. Perrin, C. Gourdon, D. Fournier, M. J. Verstraete, and L. Thevenard. Magnetic phase dependency of the thermal conductivity of ferh from thermoreflectance experiments and numerical simulations.Phys. Rev. Mat.8.084411, (2024)

work page 2024
[31]

Oppeneer

Ulrike Ritzmann, Pavel Bal´ aˇ z, Pablo Maldonado, Karel Carva, and Peter M. Oppeneer. High-frequency magnon excitation due to femtosecond spin-transfer torques. Phys. Rev. B, 101:174427, May 2020

work page 2020
[32]

Simon Streib, Nicolas Vidal-Silva, Ka Shen, and Gerrit E. W. Bauer. Magnon-phonon interactions in magnetic insulators.Phys. Rev. B, 99:184442, May 2019

work page 2019
[33]

L. J. Cornelissen, K. J. H. Peters, G. E. W. Bauer, R. A. Duine, and B. J. van Wees. Magnon spin transport driven by the magnon chemical potential in a magnetic insula- tor.Phys. Rev. B, 94:014412, Jul 2016

work page 2016
[34]

Chubykalo-Fesenko, U

O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, U. Nowak, R. W. Chantrell, and D. Garanin. Dynamic approach for micromagnetics close to the curie temperature.Phys. Rev. B, 74:094436, Sep 2006

work page 2006
[35]

T. A. Ostler, M. O. A. Ellis, D. Hinzke, and U. Nowak. Temperature-dependent ferromagnetic resonance via the landau-lifshitz-bloch equation: Application to fept.Phys. Rev. B, 90:094402, Sep 2014

work page 2014
[36]

Zhiwei Lu, I. P. Miranda, Simon Streib, Manuel Pereiro, Erik Sj¨ oqvist, Olle Eriksson, Anders Bergman, Danny Thonig, and Anna Delin. Influence of nonlocal damping on magnon properties of ferromagnets.Phys. Rev. B, 108:014433, Jul 2023

work page 2023
[37]

Skubic, J

B. Skubic, J. Hellsvik, L. Nordstr¨ om, and O. Eriksson. A method for atomistic spin dynamics simulations: im- plementation and examples.J. Phys. Condens. Matter, (2008)

work page 2008
[38]

F. B. McLean and M. Blume. Spin dynamics of linear heisenberg magnetic chains.Phys. Rev. B, 7:1149–1179, Feb 1973

work page 1973
[39]

Joseph Barker and Gerrit E. W. Bauer. Semiquantum thermodynamics of complex ferrimagnets.Phys. Rev. B, 100:140401(R), Oct 2019

work page 2019
[40]

J. M. Loveluck and C.G. Windsor. Spin dynamics of heisenberg chains : a comparison between theoretical and computer simulation studies.J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 11 2999, 1978

work page 1978
[41]

B. Dupe, S. Meyer, M. Boettcher, L. Desplat, and P.M. Buhl. Matjes v.1.1.0. 08/07/2024

work page 2024
[42]

J. H. Mentink, M. V. Tretyakov, A. Fasolino, M. I. Kat- snelson, and Th. Rasing. Stable and fast semi-implicit integration of the stochastic landau–lifshitz equation.J. Phys. Condens. Matter 22 176001, (2010)

work page 2010
[43]

H. G. Bohn, W. Zinn, B. Dorner, and A. Kollmar. Neu- tron scattering study of spin waves and exchange interac- tions in ferromagnetic eus.Phys. Rev. B, 22:5447–5452, Dec 1980

work page 1980
[44]

Temper- ature scaling of the dzyaloshinsky-moriya interaction in the spin wave spectrum.Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 96(9):094436, September 2017

Levente R´ ozsa, Unai Atxitia, and Ulrich Nowak. Temper- ature scaling of the dzyaloshinsky-moriya interaction in the spin wave spectrum.Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 96(9):094436, September 2017

work page 2017
[45]

Xiuping Tao, D. P. Landau, T. C. Schulthess, and G. M. Stocks. Spin waves in paramagnetic bcc iron: Spin dy- namics simulations.Phys. Rev. Lett., 95:087207, Aug 2005

work page 2005
[46]

Heller and M

P. Heller and M. Blume. Low-temperature spin-wave dy- namics in three-component classical heisenberg chains. Phys. Rev. Lett., 39:962–965, Oct 1977

work page 1977
[47]

Windsor and J

C.G. Windsor and J. Locke-Wheaton. Computer sim- ulation of the dynamics of one dimensional heisenberg magnets.Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 9 2749, 1976

work page 1976
[48]

Newville

M. Newville. ‘lmfit/lmfit-py: 1.2.2’.Zenodo, 2023

work page 2023
[49]

Magnon softening in a ferromagnetic monolayer: A first- principles spin dynamics study.Phys

Anders Bergman, Andrea Taroni, Lars Bergqvist, Jo- han Hellsvik, Bj¨ orgvin Hj¨ orvarsson, and Olle Eriksson. Magnon softening in a ferromagnetic monolayer: A first- principles spin dynamics study.Phys. Rev. B, 81:144416, Apr 2010

work page 2010
[50]

Joseph Barker and Gerrit E. W. Bauer. Thermal spin dynamics of yttrium iron garnet.Phys. Rev. Lett., 117:217201, Nov 2016

work page 2016
[51]

Kun Chen and D. P. Landau. Spin-dynamics study of the dynamic critical behavior of the three-dimensional classical heisenberg ferromagnet.Phys. Rev. B, 49:3266– 3274, Feb 1994

work page 1994
[52]

A. L. Bassant, M. E. Y. Regout, J. S. Harms, and R. A. Duine. Entangled magnon-pair generation in a driven synthetic antiferromagnet.Phys. Rev. B, 110:094441, Sep 2024

work page 2024
[53]

R¨ omling, Artim L

Anna-Luisa E. R¨ omling, Artim L. Bassant, and Rem- bert A. Duine. Fluctuations of the inverted magnetic state and how to sense them.arXiv:2602.03572, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[54]

Wang et al

H. Wang et al. Direct observation of antimagnons with inverted dispersion.arXiv:2601.15231, 2026

work page arXiv 2026