pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07491 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 💻 cs.CV

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Implicit Multi-Camera System Calibration Using Gaussian Processes

Ivan De Boi , Bart Ribbens , Veronika Golanova , Ursula Kapov , Simon Verspeek
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords multi-camera calibrationGaussian processesimplicit calibrationuncertainty quantificationactive learning3D reconstructioncomputer vision
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Gaussian process model learns direct 2D-to-3D mappings across multiple cameras without estimating any intrinsic or extrinsic parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that Gaussian process regression can replace conventional calibration by learning a single non-linear function from sets of 2D image points to 3D world points. Because the model supplies its own predictive uncertainty, each reconstructed point comes with statistically grounded confidence bounds that turn a prediction into a verifiable measurement. Active learning then uses those uncertainty values to choose the next calibration images, reducing the total number of observations required while preserving accuracy. This combination addresses two practical bottlenecks: the inability of rigid camera models to handle unusual optics and the high cost of gathering dense calibration data.

Core claim

Our GP-based model directly learns the complex, non-linear mapping from 2D image coordinates across all cameras to a 3D world coordinate, completely bypassing time-consuming estimation of explicit intrinsic and extrinsic parameters. The inherent UQ is critical for transforming a simple 3D point prediction into a verifiable 3D measurement, complete with statistically-sound confidence bounds. Active learning intelligently leverages the GP's predictive uncertainty to strategically guide the acquisition of new calibration data, yielding a robust, data-efficient solution particularly suited to practical settings where extensive calibration data is hard to obtain.

What carries the argument

Gaussian process regression that directly regresses from multi-view 2D coordinates to 3D points while returning predictive variance for uncertainty-driven active learning.

If this is right

  • Calibration succeeds for optics whose distortions violate standard parametric models.
  • Each 3D output carries confidence bounds that can be used directly in downstream tasks such as robotic grasping or metrology.
  • Active learning selects the most informative additional views, cutting the number of calibration images needed.
  • Prediction uncertainty rises near the cameras where the 2D sampling density is lowest.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same GP formulation could be applied to time-varying camera rigs by treating time as an extra input dimension.
  • Uncertainty surfaces produced during calibration could inform optimal placement of additional cameras.
  • The approach might be combined with sparse depth sensors to further constrain the GP in regions of high uncertainty.

Load-bearing premise

Gaussian process regression can faithfully capture all relevant non-linear distortions and inter-camera relationships without any explicit geometric model.

What would settle it

Acquire a held-out set of images with known 3D ground-truth points, run the trained GP, and test whether the Euclidean errors lie inside the reported 95 percent uncertainty intervals at the expected rate.

read the original abstract

This paper proposes a novel framework for implicit multi-camera system calibration utilizing Gaussian Process (GP) regression. Conventional explicit calibration methods are constrained by rigid mathematical models and struggle with complex, non-linear distortions from unconventional optics, while existing neural network-based implicit approaches are typically data-hungry and lack inherent uncertainty quantification (UQ). Our GP-based model directly learns the complex, non-linear mapping from 2D image coordinates across all cameras to a 3D world coordinate, completely bypassing time-consuming estimation of explicit intrinsic and extrinsic parameters. Moreover, the inherent UQ is critical for transforming a simple 3D point prediction into a verifiable 3D measurement, complete with statistically-sound confidence bounds. To further enhance data efficiency and practical deployment, we integrate Active Learning (AL), which intelligently leverages the GP's predictive uncertainty to strategically guide the acquisition of new calibration data. This approach results in a robust, data-efficient, and reliable calibration solution, proving particularly effective in practical scenarios where collecting extensive calibration data is a dominant constraint. Our experiments show that the uncertainty for the 3D predictions is higher closer to the cameras. The data points in $uv$-coordinate space are more sparse in that region, even though they are not in 3D space. This work is relevant for anyone who is tasked with the calibration of complex multi-camera systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an implicit multi-camera calibration framework based on Gaussian Process regression that directly learns the non-linear mapping from multi-view 2D image coordinates (uv) to 3D world points, bypassing explicit estimation of intrinsic and extrinsic parameters. It emphasizes the use of GP predictive uncertainty for producing statistically sound confidence bounds on 3D outputs and integrates active learning to guide efficient data acquisition. Experiments are reported to show qualitatively higher predictive uncertainty near the cameras, attributed to sparser uv sampling in that region.

Significance. If the UQ component were properly validated, the approach would provide a data-efficient alternative to explicit calibration for systems with non-standard optics, leveraging established GP properties for both regression and uncertainty. The integration of active learning is a practical strength, and the direct 2D-to-3D formulation avoids model mismatch issues common in conventional pipelines.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the GP's inherent UQ transforms 3D point predictions into 'verifiable 3D measurement[s], complete with statistically-sound confidence bounds' is unsupported. No coverage probabilities, reliability diagrams, or empirical calibration checks of the predictive variance against observed 3D errors are provided, despite the qualitative note on uncertainty patterns near cameras.
  2. [Experiments] Experiments section: The reported observation that uncertainty is higher closer to the cameras (due to sparser uv data) is presented only qualitatively; without quantitative metrics such as mean squared error, calibration error, or comparison against explicit calibration baselines and neural implicit methods, the data-efficiency and accuracy claims cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Notation for the multi-view input (concatenated uv coordinates across cameras) and the GP kernel choice should be defined explicitly in the methods section for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We agree that additional empirical validation is required to support the uncertainty quantification claims and to strengthen the experimental evaluation. We outline specific revisions below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The claim that the GP's inherent UQ transforms 3D point predictions into 'verifiable 3D measurement[s], complete with statistically-sound confidence bounds' is unsupported. No coverage probabilities, reliability diagrams, or empirical calibration checks of the predictive variance against observed 3D errors are provided, despite the qualitative note on uncertainty patterns near cameras.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract claim requires empirical support. The manuscript currently relies on the theoretical calibration properties of Gaussian processes but does not include explicit checks such as coverage probabilities or reliability diagrams. In the revised version we will add a dedicated uncertainty calibration analysis, computing empirical coverage rates and reliability diagrams on held-out 3D test points to substantiate the claim of statistically sound confidence bounds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experiments] The reported observation that uncertainty is higher closer to the cameras (due to sparser uv data) is presented only qualitatively; without quantitative metrics such as mean squared error, calibration error, or comparison against explicit calibration baselines and neural implicit methods, the data-efficiency and accuracy claims cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The original experiments emphasize the qualitative link between predictive uncertainty and uv-space data density. We acknowledge that this is insufficient for assessing overall accuracy and data efficiency. The revised manuscript will expand the experiments section to report mean squared error on 3D predictions, uncertainty calibration error, and direct comparisons against both explicit multi-camera calibration pipelines and neural implicit methods. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard GP regression applied to implicit calibration

full rationale

The paper applies established Gaussian Process regression to directly regress from multi-view 2D image coordinates to 3D world points, bypassing explicit camera models. Active learning is driven by the standard GP predictive variance, a property imported from the GP literature rather than derived or fitted within this work. No equations redefine a quantity in terms of itself, no fitted parameters are relabeled as independent predictions, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorems or ansatzes are smuggled via self-citation. The central mapping and UQ claims rest on external GP theory and are therefore self-contained against the paper's own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract alone, no specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed. The approach relies on standard Gaussian process regression, which typically involves kernel choice and hyperparameters that may be fitted.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1254 out tokens · 50021 ms · 2026-05-11T02:29:40.317361+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    Our GP-based model directly learns the complex, non-linear mapping from 2D image coordinates across all cameras to a 3D world coordinate, completely bypassing time-consuming estimation of explicit intrinsic and extrinsic parameters. Moreover, the inherent UQ is critical for transforming a simple 3D point prediction into a verifiable 3D measurement, complete with statistically-sound confidence bounds.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean costAlphaLog_fourth_deriv_at_zero unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    The squared exponential kernel is frequently selected because it is infinitely differentiable... kSE(x,x') = σ²f exp(−|x−x'|²/(2l²))

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2006 , booktitle =

    Rasmussen, Carl Edward and Williams, C K I , number =. 2006 , booktitle =

    work page 2006

  2. [2]

    2023 , journal =

    De Boi, Ivan and Ek, Carl Henrik and Penne, Rudi , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.3390/math11020380 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3390/math11020380 2023

  3. [3]

    2000 , journal =

    Zhang, Zhengyou , number =. 2000 , journal =

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    Reu, P. L. , number =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1007/s11340-013-9746-1 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11340-013-9746-1 2013

  5. [5]

    Guo, Zhen and Wan, Zelin and Zhang, Qisheng and Zhao, Xujiang and Zhang, Qi and Kaplan, Lance M. and J. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101987 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101987 2024

  6. [6]

    2024 , journal =

    De Boi, Ivan and Embrechts, Elissa and Schatteman, Quirine and Penne, Rudi and Truijen, Steven and Saeys, Wim , pages =. 2024 , journal =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102770 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102770 2024

  7. [7]

    2021 , booktitle =

    Lochman, Yaroslava and Liepieshov, Kostiantyn and Chen, Jianhui and Perdoch, Michal and Zach, Christopher and Pritts, James , pages =. 2021 , booktitle =

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Triggs, P

    Triggs, Bill and McLauchlan, Philip F. and Hartley, Richard I. and Fitzgibbon, Andrew W. , volume =. 2000 , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-44480-7 2000

  9. [9]

    2023 , journal =

    Leizea, Ibai and Herrera, Imanol and Puerto, Pablo , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.3390/s23020589 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3390/s23020589 2023

  10. [10]

    and Theriault, Diane H

    Zhang, Zhengyou and Wei, Guo Qing and Ma, Song De and Tsai, Roger Y. and Theriault, Diane H. and Fuller, Nathan W. and Jackson, Brandon E. and Bluhm, Evan and Evangelista, Dennis and Wu, Zheng and Betke, Margrit and Hedrick, Tyson L. and Sun, Wei and Cooperstock, Jeremy R. and Sturm, Peter F and Maybank, Stephen J Steve and Sturm, Peter F and Maybank, Ste...

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    1992 , booktitle =

    Beardsley, Paul and Murray, David and Zisserman, Andrew , pages =. 1992 , booktitle =

    work page 1992

  12. [12]

    2022 , journal =

    Schramm, Sebastian and Osterhold, Phil and Schmoll, Robert and Kroll, Andreas , number =. 2022 , journal =. doi:10.1080/17686733.2021.1991746 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1080/17686733.2021.1991746 2022

  13. [13]

    and Sung, Chi K

    Lin, Psang D. and Sung, Chi K. , number =. 2007 , journal =. doi:10.1364/oe.15.003012 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.15.003012 2007

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    Workneh, Habtamu Tsegaye and Chen, Xuelong and Ma, Yaoming and Bayable, Eyale and Dash, Anik , volume =. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101696 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101696 2024

  15. [15]

    2023 , booktitle =

    Jiang, Zhihao and Luo, Wenli and Hu, Tao and Zhang, Gengpei and Dou, Xiaohan and Mei, Guangwei , doi =. 2023 , booktitle =

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    2022 , journal =

    Verspeek, Simon and De Boi, Ivan and Maldague, Xavier and Penne, Rudi and Steenackers, Gunther , number =. 2022 , journal =. doi:10.3390/a15040102 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3390/a15040102 2022

  17. [17]

    2023 , journal =

    Hillen, Michaël and De Boi, Ivan and De Kerf, Thomas and Sels, Seppe and Cardenas De La Hoz, Edgar and Gladines, Jona and Steenackers, Gunther and Penne, Rudi and Vanlanduit, Steve , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.3390/math11224568 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3390/math11224568 2023

  18. [18]

    2022 , journal =

    Zhang, Juyong and Yao, Yuxin and Deng, Bailin , number =. 2022 , journal =. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3054619 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3054619 2022

  19. [19]

    2021 , booktitle =

    Sie, Niven Junliang and Srigrarom, Sutthiphong and Huang, Sunan , doi =. 2021 , booktitle =

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    2012 , booktitle =

    Ranganathan, Pradeep and Olson, Edwin , pages =. 2012 , booktitle =

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    2011 , booktitle =

    Pasolli, E and Melgani, F , pages =. 2011 , booktitle =

    work page 2011

  22. [22]

    2022 , booktitle =

    Lalchand, Vidhi and Ravuri, Aditya and Lawrence, Neil D , editor =. 2022 , booktitle =

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    and Pleiss, Geoff and Bindel, David and Weinberger, Kilian Q

    Gardner, Jacob R. and Pleiss, Geoff and Bindel, David and Weinberger, Kilian Q. and Wilson, Andrew Gordon , volume =. 2018 , booktitle =

    work page 2018

  24. [24]

    2024 , booktitle =

    De Boi, Ivan and Pathak, Stuti and Oliveira, Marina and Penne, Rudi , pages =. 2024 , booktitle =

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/11893257

    2006 , booktitle =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/11893257

    work page doi:10.1007/11893257 2006

  26. [26]

    2024 , journal =

    Qin, Haidong and Dai, Yanran and Jiang, Yuqi and Li, Dongdong and Liu, Hongwei and Zhang, Yong and Li, Jing and Yang, Tao , volume =. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1109/TIM.2023.3346490 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/tim.2023.3346490 2024

  27. [27]

    and Wilson, James R

    Avramidis, Athanassios N. and Wilson, James R. , number =. 1996 , journal =. doi:10.1287/opre.44.2.327 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1287/opre.44.2.327 1996

  28. [28]

    2013 , journal =

    Wang, Xiaogang , number =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2012.07.005 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2012.07.005 2013

  29. [29]

    2024 , journal =

    Yang, Yi and Pan, Miaoxin and Tang, Di and Wang, Tao and Yue, Yufeng and Liu, Tong and Fu, Mengyin , number =. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1109/TMECH.2023.3348986 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/tmech.2023.3348986 2024

  30. [30]

    2023 , journal =

    Parisotto, Tommaso and Mukherjee, Subhaditya and Kasaei, Hamidreza , number =. 2023 , journal =. doi:10.1007/s11370-023-00468-4 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1007/s11370-023-00468-4 2023

  31. [31]

    2023 , booktitle =

    Amosa, Temitope Ibrahim and Sebastian, Patrick and Izhar, Lila Iznita and Ibrahim, Oladimeji and Ayinla, Lukman Shehu and Bahashwan, Abdulrahman Abdullah and Bala, Abubakar and Samaila, Yau Alhaji , volume =. 2023 , booktitle =. doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126558 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2023.126558 2023

  32. [32]

    2024 , journal =

    Sakaguchi, Shoki and Amagasaki, Motoki and Kiyama, Masato and Okamoto, Toshiaki , volume =. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3371860 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2024.3371860 2024

  33. [33]

    2020 , journal =

    Kim, Jinwoo and Chi, Seokho , volume =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103121 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103121 2020

  34. [34]

    2020 , journal =

    Yang, Yi and Tang, Di and Wang, Dongsheng and Song, Wenjie and Wang, Junbo and Fu, Mengyin , volume =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.robot.2020.103505 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.robot.2020.103505 2020

  35. [35]

    2023 , booktitle =

    Fei, Lunlin and Han, Bing , number =. 2023 , booktitle =. doi:10.3390/s23083852 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3390/s23083852 2023

  36. [36]

    2020 , journal =

    Sun, Jun and Wang, Mantao and Zhao, Xin and Zhang, Dejun , number =. 2020 , journal =. doi:10.3390/sym12071116 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3390/sym12071116 2020

  37. [37]

    2024 , journal =

    Chen, Ruitao and Li, Biwei and Wang, Xianbin , number =. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2023.3322698 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3322698 2024

  38. [38]

    and Ojeda-Tuz, Mariel and Catarelli, Ryan A

    Chauhan, Mohit S. and Ojeda-Tuz, Mariel and Catarelli, Ryan A. and Gurley, Kurtis R. and Tsapetis, Dimitrios and Shields, Michael D. , volume =. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.109945 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ress.2024.109945 2024

  39. [39]

    2018 , journal =

    Uranishi, Yuki , number =. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.3169/ITEJ.72.736 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3169/itej.72.736 2018

  40. [40]

    https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3047388

    Peng, Sida and Zhou, Xiaowei and Liu, Yuan and Lin, Haotong and Huang, Qixing and Bao, Hujun , number =. 2022 , journal =. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2020.3047388 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2020.3047388 2022

  41. [41]

    2023 , journal =

    Gao, Jiongli and Wu, Jun and Huang, Mingyi and Xu, Gang , doi =. 2023 , journal =

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    2024 , booktitle =

    Wu, Tong and Yuan, Yu Jie and Zhang, Ling Xiao and Yang, Jie and Cao, Yan Pei and Yan, Ling Qi and Gao, Lin , number =. 2024 , booktitle =. doi:10.1007/s41095-024-0436-y , issn =

    work page doi:10.1007/s41095-024-0436-y 2024

  43. [43]

    2024 , journal =

    Cacciarelli, Davide and Kulahci, Murat and Tyssedal, John Sølve , number =. 2024 , journal =. doi:10.1002/qre.3392 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1002/qre.3392 2024

  44. [44]

    2011 , journal =

    Pedregosa, Fabian and Varoquaux, Gael and Gramfort, Alexandre and Michel, Vincent and Thirion, Bertrand and Grisel, Olivier and Blondel, Mathieu and Prettenhofer, Peter and Weiss, Ron and Dubourg, Vincent and Vanderplas, Jake and Passos, Alexandre and Cournapeau, David and Brucher, Matthieu and Perrot, Matthieu and Duchesnay, Edouard , volume =. 2011 , journal =

    work page 2011

  45. [45]

    2017 , journal =

    Badrinarayanan, Vijay and Kendall, Alex and Cipolla, Roberto , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2644615 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2644615 2017

  46. [46]

    2021 , booktitle =

    Jeong, Yoonwoo and Ahn, Seokjun and Choy, Christopher and Anandkumar, Animashree and Cho, Minsu and Park, Jaesik , doi =. 2021 , booktitle =

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    2009 , journal =

    Zhu, Limin and Luo, Honggen and Zhang, Xu , number =. 2009 , journal =. doi:10.1108/01439910910950496 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1108/01439910910950496 2009

  48. [48]

    2019 , journal =

    Schops, Thomas and Larsson, Viktor and Pollefeys, Marc and Sattler, Torsten , pages =. 2019 , journal =

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    In: 2020 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), pp

    Kobayashi, Masayuki and Yamazaki, Kazuyoshi and Caballero, Felipe Gomez and Osato, Takuma and Endo, Takeshi and Takemura, Masayuki and Nagasaki, Takeshi and Shima, Takeshi , volume =. 2020 , booktitle =. doi:10.1109/ICCE46568.2020.9043079 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1109/icce46568.2020.9043079 2020

  50. [50]

    2016 , journal =

    Burger, Wilhelm , pages =. 2016 , journal =

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Campbell, S. L. and Gear, C. W. The index of general nonlinear D A E S. Numer. M ath. 1995

    work page 1995

  52. [52]

    Slifka, M. K. and Whitton, J. L. Clinical implications of dysregulated cytokine production. J. M ol. M ed. 2000. doi:10.1007/s001090000086

    work page doi:10.1007/s001090000086 2000

  53. [53]

    Quasimonotonicity, regularity and duality for nonlinear systems of partial differential equations

    Hamburger, C. Quasimonotonicity, regularity and duality for nonlinear systems of partial differential equations. Ann. Mat. Pura. Appl. 1995

    work page 1995

  54. [54]

    Geddes, K. O. and Czapor, S. R. and Labahn, G. Algorithms for C omputer A lgebra. 1992

    work page 1992

  55. [55]

    Software engineering---from auxiliary to key technologies

    Broy, M. Software engineering---from auxiliary to key technologies. Software Pioneers. 1992

    work page 1992

  56. [56]

    Conductive P olymers. 1981

    work page 1981

  57. [57]

    Smith, S. E. Neuromuscular blocking drugs in man. Neuromuscular junction. H andbook of experimental pharmacology. 1976

    work page 1976

  58. [58]

    Chung, S. T. and Morris, R. L. Isolation and characterization of plasmid deoxyribonucleic acid from Streptomyces fradiae. 1978

    work page 1978

  59. [59]

    and AghaKouchak, A

    Hao, Z. and AghaKouchak, A. and Nakhjiri, N. and Farahmand, A. Global integrated drought monitoring and prediction system (GIDMaPS) data sets. 2014

    work page 2014

  60. [60]

    Babichev, S. A. and Ries, J. and Lvovsky, A. I. Quantum scissors: teleportation of single-mode optical states by means of a nonlocal single photon. 2002

    work page 2002

  61. [61]

    Wormholes in Maximal Supergravity

    Beneke, M. and Buchalla, G. and Dunietz, I. Mixing induced CP asymmetries in inclusive B decays. Phys. L ett. 1997. arXiv:0707.3168

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  62. [62]

    deep SIP : deep learning of S upernova I a P arameters

    Stahl, B. deep SIP : deep learning of S upernova I a P arameters. 2020. ascl:2006.023

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    Abbott, T. M. C. and others. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing. Phys. Rev. D. 2019. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.123505. arXiv:1810.02499

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.123505 2019