pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07736 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 💻 cs.AI

Recognition: no theorem link

Online Goal Recognition using Path Signature and Dynamic Time Warping

Douglas Tesch, Felipe Meneguzzi, Leonardo Amado, Nathan Gavenski, Odinaldo Rodrigues

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 03:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI
keywords goal recognitionpath signaturesdynamic time warpingonline planningtrajectory encodingcontinuous domains
0
0 comments X

The pith

Path signatures combined with dynamic time warping enable more accurate and efficient online goal recognition than custom state representations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes encoding trajectories with path signatures to support online goal recognition via dynamic time warping comparisons in continuous domains. This addresses the dual problems of compactly representing large observation sequences and comparing them effectively against possible goals. If the approach works, AI systems could infer intended goals from partial movement data more reliably and with lower computational cost during live operation. Readers would care because goal recognition underpins planning and interaction in robotics and autonomous systems, where real-time performance matters.

Core claim

Path signatures supply a compact, expressive encoding of trajectories drawn from rough path theory; when paired with dynamic time warping to measure similarity against hypothesized goals, the method yields higher predictive accuracy and faster online planning than prior custom state-space techniques while matching their offline results.

What carries the argument

Path signature encoding of trajectories, which extracts semantic features efficiently, together with dynamic time warping to compare partial observations against goal hypotheses.

Load-bearing premise

Path signatures efficiently capture key semantic features of trajectories, enabling more meaningful comparisons than custom state-space representations.

What would settle it

If the path-signature method shows no accuracy or online-efficiency gains over custom representations on standard continuous-domain goal-recognition benchmarks, the claimed advantage collapses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07736 by Douglas Tesch, Felipe Meneguzzi, Leonardo Amado, Nathan Gavenski, Odinaldo Rodrigues.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dynamic Time Warping example. trajectories τ and τ ′ considering the squared Euclidean dis￾tance (||si − s ′ j ||2 ). Note that the orange cells represent the sequence with the minimum cost (27). The output of the DTW algorithm is a vector combining the indices of the el￾ements that best align the sequences. Thus, the output is δ = [(1, 1) ; (2, 2) ; (3, 3) ; (3, 4)], knows as warping path [PITH_FULL_IMAG… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Example of trajectory tree for the Aftershock map. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Grid search results. captures rich geometric and temporal dynamics while remain￾ing robust to suboptimal behavior. Importantly, this added expressiveness does not compromise runtime performance; GRPS remains lightweight and fast enough for real-time ap￾plications, with an average inference time of just 30ms. Al￾though GRPS incurs slightly higher Offline times, this is pri￾marily due to its use of Vector’s … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Observation fraction results for both domains. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: collection of signatures for τ , where k ∈ [0,∞). B.2 Path Signatures Numerical Example We now consider a trajectory τ with two two-dimensional states {τ 1 t , τ 2 t }, and the set of multi-indexes W = { (i1, · · · , ik) | k ⩾ 1, i1, · · · , ik ∈ {1, 2} }, which is the set of all finite sequences of 1’s and 2’s. Given the trajec￾tory τ : [1, 10] → R 2 illustrated in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Trajectory tree for a single trajectory. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Step-by-step computation of a path signature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Trajectories for τ, τ ′ , and τ ′′ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Trajectory tree for τ, τ ′ , τ ′′ , and τ ′′′ . of τ ′′′ from τ at t = 2, can produce entirely new branches in the trajectory tree due to the sensitivity of path signatures. While this property is valuable for distinguishing trajectory structures, it also results in unnecessarily complex trees with redundant or overly fine-trained branches. In the context of goal recognition, such complexity can hinder bo… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Trajectories for τ, τ ′ , τ ′′ , and τ ′′′ . 1 [1.0, 0.0, 0.5, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] [2.0, 0.0, 2.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] [3.0, 0.0, 4.5, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0] [2.0, 1.0, 2.0, 1.5, 0.5, 0.5] [3.0, 2.0, 4.5, 4.0, 2.0, 2.0] [1.0, 1.0, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5, 0.5] [2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0, 2.0] [3.0, 2.0, 4.5, 2.0, 4.0, 2.0] [1.000, 0.100, 0.500, 0.050, 0.050, 0.005] [2.000, 0.000, 2.000, −0.100, 0.100, 0.000] [3.000, 0.000, 4.500, −0.1… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Working dataset examples. moves while minimizing travel time as a cost function. Fig￾ure 13b shows an example of optimal observations (orange) and their approximated trajectory (green). Although both trajectories look quite similar, there are points where the approximated trajectories are not identical and may display more drastic differences. We used the dataset available at: https://github.com/douglasat… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Online goal recognition in continuous domains poses two central challenges: efficiently encoding large trajectories and effectively comparing them. Recent work addresses these challenges by using custom state-space representations and metrics to compare observations against hypotheses. However, these approaches often overlook well-established encoding techniques used in other domains that offer substantial advantages. This paper introduces a novel method for online goal recognition that leverages path signatures, a compact, expressive representation of rough path theory that efficiently captures key semantic features of trajectories, enabling more meaningful comparisons between them. Experiments show that our method consistently outperforms the state of the art in predictive accuracy and online planning efficiency, while remaining competitive offline.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes using path signatures from rough path theory to compactly encode trajectories in continuous domains for online goal recognition, combined with Dynamic Time Warping for hypothesis comparison. It claims this yields higher predictive accuracy and online planning efficiency than prior custom state-space representations and metrics, while remaining competitive in offline settings, supported by head-to-head experiments showing consistent gains across tested domains and baselines.

Significance. If the reported gains hold under the experimental conditions, the contribution is significant because it imports a well-established, parameter-light encoding technique that captures semantic trajectory features without requiring domain-specific state-space engineering. The approach addresses core challenges of trajectory length and partial observability in online goal recognition, with direct evidence from timing measurements and hypothesis-ranking stability under incomplete data.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the outperformance claim is stated without naming the continuous domains, baselines, or metrics; a single sentence summarizing these would improve accessibility while the details remain in §4.
  2. [§4] §4 (experimental tables): confirm that all reported deltas include standard deviations or statistical significance tests to strengthen the 'consistently outperforms' assertion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We appreciate the recognition that path signatures offer a parameter-light, domain-agnostic encoding that addresses trajectory length and partial observability challenges in online goal recognition, and that our experiments demonstrate consistent gains over prior custom representations.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper introduces path signatures from rough path theory combined with dynamic time warping as a new encoding and comparison technique for online goal recognition. The abstract and described method rely on established external mathematical tools rather than self-defined quantities or fitted parameters that are then re-presented as predictions. No equations or claims in the provided text reduce the central performance improvements to tautological inputs by construction, and the experimental comparisons to prior state-of-the-art methods are presented as independent evaluations without load-bearing self-citations that would force the results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no equations, parameters, or derivations; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5402 in / 961 out tokens · 29021 ms · 2026-05-11T03:11:40.017775+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

83 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Plan Recognition in Continuous Domains , year =

    Kaminka, Gal A and Vered, Mor and Agmon, Noa , booktitle =. Plan Recognition in Continuous Domains , year =

  2. [2]

    Morrill, A

    James Morrill and Adeline Fermanian and Patrick Kidger and Terry J. Lyons , title =. CoRR , volume =. 2020 , url =. 2006.00873 , timestamp =

  3. [3]

    Plan Recognition as Planning Revisited

    Sohrabi, S and Riabov, A V and Udrea, O , booktitle =. Plan Recognition as Planning Revisited. , year =

  4. [4]

    Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Landmark-based approaches for goal recognition as planning , author=. Artificial Intelligence , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  5. [5]

    Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) , year =

    Lu\'. Proceedings of the 35th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) , year =

  6. [6]

    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume=

    The fast downward planning system , author=. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , volume=

  7. [7]

    Symbolic Top-k Planning , year =

    David Speck and Robert Mattm. Symbolic Top-k Planning , year =. Thirty-Fourth

  8. [8]

    Plan explicability and predictability for robot task planning , year=

    Zhang, Yu and Sreedharan, Sarath and Kulkarni, Anagha and Chakraborti, Tathagata and Zhuo, Hankz Hankui and Kambhampati, Subbarao , booktitle=. Plan explicability and predictability for robot task planning , year=

  9. [9]

    Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning , volume=

    Introduction to Symbolic Plan and Goal Recognition , author=. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  10. [10]

    2021 , note=

    Kidger, Patrick and Lyons, Terry , booktitle=. 2021 , note=

  11. [11]

    Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , publisher =

    A Survey on Goal Recognition as Planning , author =. Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , publisher =. 2021 , month =. doi:, url =

  12. [12]

    Landmark-based approaches for goal recognition as planning , volume =

    Pereira, Ramon and Oren, Nir and Meneguzzi, Felipe , year =. Landmark-based approaches for goal recognition as planning , volume =

  13. [13]

    2014 , publisher=

    Plan, activity, and intent recognition: Theory and practice , author=. 2014 , publisher=

  14. [14]

    , author=

    The impact of adversarial knowledge on adversarial planning in perimeter patrol. , author=. AAMAS (1) , pages=

  15. [15]

    1990 , publisher=

    Plan recognition in natural language dialogue , author=. 1990 , publisher=

  16. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.4980 , year=

    Accounting for context in plan recognition, with application to traffic monitoring , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1302.4980 , year=

  17. [17]

    AI Magazine , volume=

    Any-angle path planning , author=. AI Magazine , volume=

  18. [18]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=

    Sparse roadmap spanners for asymptotically near-optimal motion planning , author=. The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  19. [19]

    2020 , publisher=

    Gammell, Jonathan D and Barfoot, Timothy D and Srinivasa, Siddhartha S , journal=. 2020 , publisher=

  20. [20]

    Nau and Paolo Traverso , publisher =

    Malik Ghallab and Dana S. Nau and Paolo Traverso , publisher =. Automated planning - theory and practice , optisbn =

  21. [21]

    The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=

    Sampling-based algorithms for optimal motion planning , author=. The International Journal of Robotics Research , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  22. [22]

    Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

    Plan recognition in continuous domains , author=. Twenty-Seventh AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

  23. [23]

    Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems , volume=

    Planning and decision-making for autonomous vehicles , author=. Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems , volume=

  24. [24]

    2017 , publisher=

    Modern Robotics: Mechanics, Planning, and Control , author=. 2017 , publisher=

  25. [25]

    2005 , publisher=

    Introduction to robotics: mechanics and control , author=. 2005 , publisher=

  26. [26]

    Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, China

    Online probabilistic goal recognition over nominal models , author=. Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2019, China. , year=

  27. [27]

    Proceedings The Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications , pages=

    Template-based multi-agent plan recognition for tactical situation assessment , author=. Proceedings The Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications , pages=. 1989 , organization=

  28. [28]

    Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems , pages=

    Enabling perception for plan recognition in multi-agent air mission simulations , author=. Proceedings Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems , pages=. 2000 , organization=

  29. [29]

    Proceedings of the International workshop on modeling other agents from observations (MOO-05) , volume=

    Partial observability and probabilistic plan/goal recognition , author=. Proceedings of the International workshop on modeling other agents from observations (MOO-05) , volume=

  30. [30]

    Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

    Probabilistic plan recognition using off-the-shelf classical planners , author=. Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

  31. [31]

    Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages=

    Plan recognition as planning , author=. Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages=. 2009 , organization=

  32. [32]

    1991 , publisher=

    Introduction to robotics , author=. 1991 , publisher=

  33. [33]

    2020 , publisher=

    Introduction to robotics: analysis, control, applications , author=. 2020 , publisher=

  34. [34]

    IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine , volume=

    The open motion planning library , author=. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  35. [35]

    2019 , publisher=

    Reinforcement learning and optimal control , author=. 2019 , publisher=

  36. [36]

    Sixteenth Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems , pages=

    Cost-based goal recognition for path-planning , author=. Sixteenth Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems , pages=

  37. [37]

    2009 , publisher=

    Introduction to robotics: mechanics and control, 3/E , author=. 2009 , publisher=

  38. [38]

    IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games , volume=

    Benchmarks for grid-based pathfinding , author=. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  39. [39]

    Learning for Dynamics and Control , pages=

    Optimal Cost Design for Model Predictive Control , author=. Learning for Dynamics and Control , pages=. 2021 , organization=

  40. [40]

    Twenty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

    Adversarial uncertainty in multi-robot patrol , author=. Twenty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , year=

  41. [41]

    Fast and Complete Symbolic Plan Recognition , booktitle =

    Dorit Avrahami. Fast and Complete Symbolic Plan Recognition , booktitle =

  42. [42]

    Robotics Research , pages=

    Automated robot behavior recognition , author=. Robotics Research , pages=. 2000 , publisher=

  43. [43]

    Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages=

    Heuristic online goal recognition in continuous domains , author=. Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , pages=

  44. [44]

    Journal of Field Robotics , volume=

    Differentially constrained mobile robot motion planning in state lattices , author=. Journal of Field Robotics , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  45. [45]

    Technical Report, Tech

    PDDL| The Planning Domain Definition Language , author=. Technical Report, Tech. Rep. , year=

  46. [46]

    1971 , publisher=

    Fikes, Richard E and Nilsson, Nils J , journal=. 1971 , publisher=

  47. [47]

    Seventeenth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems , pages=

    Towards online goal recognition combining goal mirroring and landmarks , author=. Seventeenth International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems , pages=

  48. [48]

    Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Landmark-based heuristics for goal recognition , author=. Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , volume=

  49. [49]

    Goal Recognition as Reinforcement Learning , year =

    Leonardo Amado and Reuth Mirsky and Felipe Meneguzzi , booktitle =. Goal Recognition as Reinforcement Learning , year =

  50. [50]

    LatRec: Recognizing Goals in Latent Space (Demo) , year =

    Amado, Leonardo and Aires, João Paulo and Pereira, Ramon F and Magnaguagno, Maurício C and Granada, Roger and Licks, Gabriel Paludo and Meneguzzi, Felipe , booktitle =. LatRec: Recognizing Goals in Latent Space (Demo) , year =

  51. [51]

    LatRec - Recognizing Goals in Latent Space (Student Abstract) , year =

    Amado, Leonardo and Meneguzzi, Felipe , booktitle =. LatRec - Recognizing Goals in Latent Space (Student Abstract) , year =

  52. [52]

    Goal Recognition via Variational Causality , year =

    Wen, Jiaqi and Amado, Leonardo , booktitle =. Goal Recognition via Variational Causality , year =

  53. [53]

    Towards Efficient Online Goal Recognition through Deep Learning , year =

    Serina, Lorenzo and Chiari, Mattia and Gerevini, Alfonso Emilio and Putelli, Luca and Serina, Ivan , booktitle =. Towards Efficient Online Goal Recognition through Deep Learning , year =

  54. [54]

    Amado and Ramon F

    Leonardo R. Amado and Ramon F. Pereira and Felipe Meneguzzi , booktitle =. 2023 , publisher =

  55. [55]

    25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) , year =

    Osher Elhadad and Felipe Meneguzzi and Reuth Mirsky , title =. 25th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) , year =

  56. [56]

    2005 , publisher=

    Principles of robot motion: theory, algorithms, and implementations , author=. 2005 , publisher=

  57. [57]

    Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence , volume=

    Behaviour Recognition with Kinodynamic Planning Over Continuous Domains , author=. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  58. [58]

    2019 , publisher=

    Introduction to mathematical statistics , author=. 2019 , publisher=

  59. [59]

    27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence , journal=

    Real-time goal recognition using approximations in Euclidean space , author=. 27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence , journal=. 2024 , doi=

  60. [60]

    27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence , journal=

    Explorative Imitation Learning: A Path Signature Approach for Continuous Environments , author=. 27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence , journal=. 2024 , doi=

  61. [61]

    Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , pages=

    Using dynamic time warping to find patterns in time series , author=. Proceedings of the 3rd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining , pages=

  62. [62]

    Entropy , volume=

    Real-Time Online Goal Recognition in Continuous Domains via Deep Reinforcement Learning , author=. Entropy , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  63. [63]

    Revista Matem

    Differential equations driven by rough signals , author=. Revista Matem

  64. [64]

    International Journal of Data Science and Analytics , volume=

    Path signature-based phase space reconstruction for stock trend prediction , author=. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  65. [65]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Deep signature transforms , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  66. [66]

    2002 , publisher=

    System control and rough paths , author=. 2002 , publisher=

  67. [67]

    IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing , volume=

    Dynamic programming algorithm optimization for spoken word recognition , author=. IEEE transactions on acoustics, speech, and signal processing , volume=. 1978 , publisher=

  68. [68]

    Entropy , volume=

    Goal Identification Control Using an Information Entropy-Based Goal Uncertainty Metric , author=. Entropy , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  69. [69]

    IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , year=

    Behavioral intention prediction in driving scenes: A survey , author=. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , year=

  70. [70]

    2024 5th International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC) , pages=

    Goal Recognition in Soccer Matches using Deep Learning Techniques , author=. 2024 5th International Conference on Smart Electronics and Communication (ICOSEC) , pages=. 2024 , organization=

  71. [71]

    GIScience & Remote Sensing , volume=

    A comparative analysis of trajectory similarity measures , author=. GIScience & Remote Sensing , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  72. [72]

    Journal of statistical Software , volume=

    Computing and visualizing dynamic time warping alignments in R: the dtw package , author=. Journal of statistical Software , volume=

  73. [73]

    2024 , url =

    Pypi Contributors , title =. 2024 , url =

  74. [74]

    arXiv:1603.03788 , year=

    Ilya Chevyrev and Andrey Kormilitzin , title =. arXiv:1603.03788 , year =. 1603.03788v1 , eprintclass =

  75. [75]

    science , volume=

    Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks , author=. science , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  76. [76]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2020 , organization=

  77. [77]

    International conference on machine learning , pages=

    Curiosity-driven exploration by self-supervised prediction , author=. International conference on machine learning , pages=. 2017 , organization=

  78. [78]

    Explorative Imitation Learning: A Path Signature Approach for Continuous Environments

    Schneider Gavenski , Gavenski and Juarez Monteiro and Felipe Meneguzzi and Michael Luck and Odinaldo Rodrigues. Explorative Imitation Learning: A Path Signature Approach for Continuous Environments. 27th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2024

  79. [79]

    1991 , publisher=

    Applied nonlinear control , author=. 1991 , publisher=

  80. [80]

    Intelligent data analysis , volume=

    Toward accurate dynamic time warping in linear time and space , author=. Intelligent data analysis , volume=. 2007 , publisher=

Showing first 80 references.