arxiv: 2605.07803 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 🧮 math.AP

Recognition: no theorem link

Global Dynamics and Synchronization of Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson Neural Networks

Yuncheng You

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:18 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP

keywords Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson modelneural networksglobal dynamicsdissipativitysynchronizationa priori estimatesfractional derivativesmemristive systems

0 comments

The pith

A Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson neural network model is globally dissipative and achieves complete synchronization above an explicit coupling threshold.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces the Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson model to retain the key nonlinear ionic currents of the original Hodgkin-Huxley equations while enabling mathematical analysis of networks. Through detailed a priori estimates on the membrane potentials and gating variables, it shows that all solutions remain bounded and enter a compact absorbing set independent of initial data. The same estimates applied to differences between coupled neurons establish that synchronization occurs exponentially fast once the coupling strength surpasses a calculable value. This framework is extended to include fractional derivatives and memristive elements. Such results matter because they give concrete conditions under which detailed biophysical models of neurons produce coherent network behavior without numerical blowup.

Core claim

The Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson neural networks possess robustly dissipative global dynamics with a sharp ultimate bound, and complete synchronization occurs at an exponential rate provided the interneuron coupling strength meets an explicitly computable threshold condition.

What carries the argument

The proposed Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson model equations, combined with uniform a priori estimates derived from hard analysis on the solutions and the interneuron differencing equations.

If this is right

All trajectories of the network enter a bounded absorbing set whose size is independent of initial data.
The exponential synchronization rate is controlled explicitly by the excess of coupling strength over the threshold.
The same estimates and conclusions apply directly to the Caputo fractional-order and memristive versions of the model.
Network simulations remain well-posed and can be restricted to the absorbing set without artificial truncation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Large-scale numerical explorations of biologically detailed networks could be made more efficient by confining computations to the proven absorbing region.
The differencing technique used here may extend to proving synchronization in other high-dimensional conductance-based neuron models.
The explicit threshold supplies a quantitative prediction that could be checked against observed coupling strengths in biological neural tissue.

Load-bearing premise

The Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson equations faithfully capture the essential nonlinearity and conductances of the sodium and potassium channels without introducing artifacts that would invalidate the estimates.

What would settle it

A numerical simulation or analytical counterexample showing that solutions unboundedly grow for some initial conditions, or that neuron differences fail to decay exponentially for coupling strengths above the derived threshold, would falsify the main theorems.

read the original abstract

Hodgkin-Huxley equations as a monumental breakthrough in biological and physiological theory of the 20th century had been distilled into many simplified models to study, typically FitzHugh-Nagumo equations and Hindmarsh-Rose equations, but the model itself not being fully investigated in terms of global and asymptotic dynamics due to its strong nonlinearity and higher dimensionality. In this paper a new model called Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson neural networks is proposed and investigated. This model captured the essential features of the nonlinearity and the conductances of two dominant ionic current channels of sodium and potassium coupled with the membrane equation in the original Hodgkin-Huxley model. Through uniform and sharp \emph{a priori} estimates by hard analysis on the solutions of the model equations and the interneuron differencing equations, It is rigorously proved that global solution dynamics are robustly dissipative with a sharp ultimate bound and that complete synchronization of the Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson neural networks at an exponential convergence rate occurs if the interneuron coupling strength satisfies an explicitly computable threshold condition. The main results are further extended to Caputo fractional memristive Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson neural networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper introduces a Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson model and claims explicit global dissipativity plus synchronization thresholds via a priori estimates, but those estimates rest on unverified control of the nonlinear ionic terms.

read the letter

The main point is that this work defines a new Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson neural network that retains the core nonlinear sodium and potassium conductances from the original Hodgkin-Huxley equations, then uses uniform a priori estimates on the system and the interneuron difference equations to prove global dissipativity with a sharp ultimate bound and exponential synchronization once the coupling strength passes an explicitly computable threshold. It further extends the same claims to a Caputo fractional memristive version. That explicit threshold and the focus on the less-reduced HH dynamics are the concrete advances over the usual FitzHugh-Nagumo or Hindmarsh-Rose treatments. The approach follows standard hard-analysis techniques for dissipative estimates and error systems, which is fine as far as it goes. The soft spot is exactly where the stress-test note points: the abstract asserts that the model captures the essential nonlinearity and conductances, yet gives no explicit functional forms or verification that the nonlinear terms obey the growth, sign, or Lipschitz conditions needed to close the bounds without hidden parameter restrictions. If those terms produce sign-indefinite regions or higher-degree growth, the ultimate bound may fail to be absorbing and the synchronization threshold may not guarantee exponential decay. Without the full derivations it is impossible to tell whether the estimates are tight or merely plausible. This paper is for readers in mathematical neuroscience who want global results on models that stay closer to ion-channel biophysics than the common reductions. It is incremental rather than foundational, but the claims are stated clearly enough that a serious referee could check the estimates and the parameter ranges in one pass. I would bring it to a reading group to see whether the nonlinear control actually works. I would not cite it myself in the next year. It deserves peer review because the results are specific and the subfield can use explicit synchronization conditions even if revisions are required.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson (HHW) neural network model that retains the essential nonlinearities and conductances of the sodium and potassium channels from the classical Hodgkin-Huxley equations. Via uniform and sharp a priori estimates obtained by direct hard analysis on the model equations and the interneuron differencing equations, it claims to prove that the global dynamics are robustly dissipative with a sharp ultimate bound, and that complete synchronization occurs at an exponential rate whenever the interneuron coupling strength exceeds an explicitly computable threshold derived from the model parameters. The results are extended to the Caputo fractional-order memristive HHW case.

Significance. If the estimates close without gaps, the work supplies a rigorous global-dynamics and synchronization theory for a biologically motivated, high-dimensional neural model that goes beyond the usual reduced models (FitzHugh-Nagumo, Hindmarsh-Rose). The explicit, parameter-based synchronization threshold and the extension to fractional memristive networks would be useful contributions to the mathematical neuroscience literature.

major comments (3)

[Model formulation] Model equations section: the precise functional forms of the sodium and potassium nonlinear current terms are asserted to 'capture the essential features' of the original Hodgkin-Huxley conductances, yet no explicit verification is supplied that these terms obey the polynomial growth bounds, sign conditions, or local Lipschitz constants required to close the uniform a priori estimates for dissipativity and for the error-system decay.
[Global dynamics and a priori estimates] A priori estimates and dissipativity proof: the claim of a 'sharp ultimate bound' and robust global dissipativity rests on controlling the nonlinear terms in the membrane and gating equations; without an explicit check that no sign-indefinite regions or super-quadratic growth appear, the absorbing-set argument may fail for some parameter regimes or initial data.
[Synchronization analysis] Synchronization threshold derivation: the exponential convergence rate is stated to hold once the coupling strength exceeds an explicitly computable value, but it is unclear whether this threshold remains valid uniformly when the membrane potentials or gating variables enter the regions where the nonlinearities are not strictly dissipative, which would undermine the 'complete synchronization' claim.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract contains minor grammatical issues ('It is rigorously proved' should begin with lowercase 'it'; the clause 'but the model itself not being fully investigated' is incomplete).
[General] All parameter ranges and any auxiliary inequalities used to close the estimates should be collected in a single, clearly labeled assumption list so that the threshold computation can be reproduced directly from the model parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below. Where the comments identify gaps in explicit verification or clarity, we have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested details while preserving the core arguments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Model formulation] Model equations section: the precise functional forms of the sodium and potassium nonlinear current terms are asserted to 'capture the essential features' of the original Hodgkin-Huxley conductances, yet no explicit verification is supplied that these terms obey the polynomial growth bounds, sign conditions, or local Lipschitz constants required to close the uniform a priori estimates for dissipativity and for the error-system decay.

Authors: We appreciate this observation. The functional forms in (2.3)-(2.5) are chosen to retain the essential nonlinear and conductance features of the classical Hodgkin-Huxley sodium and potassium currents. In the revised manuscript we have inserted Lemma 2.1, which supplies the missing explicit verification: the terms satisfy polynomial growth of degree at most 3, the sign conditions that guarantee dissipativity for large |V| and gating variables, and local Lipschitz continuity with explicitly computable constants. These bounds are then used uniformly in all subsequent estimates. revision: yes
Referee: [Global dynamics and a priori estimates] A priori estimates and dissipativity proof: the claim of a 'sharp ultimate bound' and robust global dissipativity rests on controlling the nonlinear terms in the membrane and gating equations; without an explicit check that no sign-indefinite regions or super-quadratic growth appear, the absorbing-set argument may fail for some parameter regimes or initial data.

Authors: The referee correctly notes that the dissipativity proof requires careful control of the nonlinearities. The original proof of Theorem 3.1 already employs the growth conditions to obtain an absorbing set, but we agree that the handling of possible sign-indefinite regions and confirmation that growth remains at most cubic (hence no super-quadratic issues) should be made fully explicit. In the revision we have expanded the proof with an additional step-by-step estimate showing that, after a uniform transient time, solutions enter a region where the dissipative linear terms dominate; the ultimate bound is then derived directly from the model parameters and is independent of initial data. This constitutes a partial revision: the core argument was present but is now presented with greater transparency and explicit checks. revision: partial
Referee: [Synchronization analysis] Synchronization threshold derivation: the exponential convergence rate is stated to hold once the coupling strength exceeds an explicitly computable value, but it is unclear whether this threshold remains valid uniformly when the membrane potentials or gating variables enter the regions where the nonlinearities are not strictly dissipative, which would undermine the 'complete synchronization' claim.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this uniformity issue. The synchronization threshold in Theorem 4.1 is obtained from the Lipschitz constants of the nonlinearities evaluated over the absorbing set furnished by Theorem 3.1. Because every solution enters this set in finite time (uniformly in initial data), the error-system estimates hold globally for large t. In the revised manuscript we have added a clarifying remark and a short lemma confirming that the worst-case Lipschitz constants are attained inside the absorbing set, so the threshold remains valid and the exponential decay is uniform. The complete synchronization claim is therefore asymptotic as t→∞ and is not undermined. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct a priori estimates on model equations

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by applying uniform estimates and Lyapunov-type analysis directly to the proposed HHW model equations and the associated error system for synchronization. The ultimate bound and the explicit coupling threshold are obtained from the growth and sign properties of the specific nonlinear terms in the sodium/potassium conductances as written in the model; no parameter is fitted to data and then renamed as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the threshold condition is stated to be computable from the model coefficients without reference to the target synchronization rate. The analysis is therefore self-contained against the stated equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on the new model being a faithful reduction of the Hodgkin-Huxley system and on the applicability of standard hard-analysis techniques to its nonlinear terms; no free parameters are introduced in the abstract, and the threshold is presented as computable rather than fitted.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson model equations are well-posed and admit global-in-time solutions for the given parameter ranges.
Required before a priori estimates and synchronization analysis can be applied.

invented entities (1)

Hodgkin-Huxley-Wilson neural network model no independent evidence
purpose: To retain the essential nonlinearity and conductances of sodium and potassium channels while simplifying the original Hodgkin-Huxley system.
Newly proposed in the paper as the object of study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5498 in / 1500 out tokens · 53717 ms · 2026-05-11T02:18:42.548345+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages

[1]

Hodgkin, A.F

A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley,A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve, The Journal of Physiology,117(4) (1952), 500-544

work page 1952
[2]

Hodgkin, A.F

A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley,Currents carried by sodium and potassium ions through the mem- brane of the giant axon of Loligo, The Journal of Physiology,116(4) (1952), 449-472. 23

work page 1952
[3]

Hodgkin, A.F

A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley,The components of membrane conductance in the giant axon of Loligo, The Journal of Physiology,116(4) (1952), 473-496

work page 1952
[4]

Hodgkin, A.F

A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley,The dual effect of membrane potential on sodium conductance in the giant axon of Loligo, The Journal of Physiology,116(4) (1952), 497-506

work page 1952
[5]

Hodgkin, A.F

A.L. Hodgkin, A.F. Huxley, B. Katz,Measurement of current-voltage relations in the membrane of the giant axon of Loligo, The Journal of Physiology,116(4) (1952), 424-448

work page 1952
[6]

Keener, J

J. Keener, J. Sneyd,Mathematical Physiology, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998

work page 1998
[7]

Ermentrout, D.H

G.B. Ermentrout, D.H. Terman,Mathematical Foundation of Neuroscience, Springer, New York, 2010

work page 2010
[8]

FitzHugh,Impulses and physiological states in theoretical model of nerve membrane, Bio- physics Journal,1(1961), 445-466

R. FitzHugh,Impulses and physiological states in theoretical model of nerve membrane, Bio- physics Journal,1(1961), 445-466

work page 1961
[9]

Hindmarsh, R.M

J.L. Hindmarsh, R.M. Rose,A model of neuronal bursting using three coupled first-order dif- ferential equations, Proceedings of the Royal Society, London, Series B: Biological Sciiences, 221(1984), 87-102

work page 1984
[10]

Morris, H

C. Morris, H. Lecar,Voltage oscillations in the barnacle giant muscle fiber, Biophysics Journal, 35(1) (1981), 193

work page 1981
[11]

Wilson,Simplified dynamics of human and mammalian neocortical neurons, J

H.R. Wilson,Simplified dynamics of human and mammalian neocortical neurons, J. Theoretical Biology,200(1999), 375-388

work page 1999
[12]

Izjikevich,Simple model of spiking neurons, IEEE Trans

E.M. Izjikevich,Simple model of spiking neurons, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks,14(2003), 1569-1572

work page 2003
[13]

Cronin,Mathematical Aspects of Hodgkin-Huxley Neural Theory, Cambridge Univ

J. Cronin,Mathematical Aspects of Hodgkin-Huxley Neural Theory, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK, 1987

work page 1987
[14]

Evans, N

J. Evans, N. Shenk,Solutions to axon equations, Biophysical Journal,10(1970), 1090-1101

work page 1970
[15]

Evans,Nerve axon equations IV: the stable and the unstable impulse, Indiana Univ

J. Evans,Nerve axon equations IV: the stable and the unstable impulse, Indiana Univ. Math. Journal,24(1975), 1160-1190

work page 1975
[16]

Golubitsky, D

M. Golubitsky, D. Schaeffer,Singularities and Groups in Bifurcation Theory, Vol. 1, Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1985

work page 1985
[17]

Fitzgibbon, M

W.E. Fitzgibbon, M. Parrot, Y. You,Finite dimensionality and upper semicontinuity of the global attractor of singularly perturbed Hodgkin-Huxley systems, Journal of Differential Equa- tions,129(1) (1996), 193-237

work page 1996
[18]

Jaeger, R

D. Jaeger, R. Jung,Encyclopedia of Computational Neuroscience, Springer, New York, NY, 2002

work page 2002
[19]

Guckenheimer, R.A

J. Guckenheimer, R.A. Oliva,Chaos in the Hodgkin-Huxley model, SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems,1(1) (2002), 105-114

work page 2002
[20]

J. Wang, L. Chen, X. Fei,Analysis and control of the bifurcation of Hodgkin-Huxley model, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals,31(1) (2007), 247-256

work page 2007
[21]

Batista, R.L

C.A. Batista, R.L. Viana, S.R. Lopes, A.M. Batista,Dynamic range in small-world networks of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons with chemical synapses. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications,410(2014), 628-640

work page 2014
[22]

Y. Yuan, Y. Chen, X. Li,Theoretical analysis of transcranial magneto-acoustical stimulation with Hodgkin-Huxley neuron model, Frontiers Computational Neuroscience,10(2016), 00035

work page 2016
[23]

C. Phan, Y. You, J. Su,Global attractor of Hindmarsh-Rose equations in neurodynamics, Journal of Nonlinear Modeling and Analysis,2(4) (2020), 559-577

work page 2020
[24]

C. Phan, Y. You,Global dynamics of nonautonomous Hindmarsh-Rose equations, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications,53(2020), 103078. 24

work page 2020
[25]

C. Phan, Y. You,Exponential attractor for Hindmarsh-Rose equations in neurodynamics, Jour- nal of Applied Analysis and Computation,10(5) (2020), 1-22

work page 2020
[26]

Skrzypek, Y

L. Skrzypek, Y. You,Dynamics and synchronization of boundary coupled FitzHugh-Nagumo neural networks, Applied Mathematics and Computation,388(2020), 125545

work page 2020
[27]

C. Phan, Y. You, J. Su,Global dynamics of partly diffusive Hindmarsh-Rose equations in neurodynamics, Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations,18(1) (2021), 33-47

work page 2021
[28]

C. Phan, Y. You,Random attractor for stochastic Hindmarsh-Rose equations with. additive noise, Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations,33(2021), 489-510

work page 2021
[29]

Abeles, Y

M. Abeles, Y. Prut, H. Bergman, E. Vaadia,Synchronization in neuronal transmission and its importance for information processing, Progress in Brain Research,102(1994), 395-404

work page 1994
[30]

Boccaletti, A.N

S. Boccaletti, A.N. Pisarchik, C.I. Del Genio, A. Amann,Synchronization From Coupled Sys- tems to Complex Networks, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2018

work page 2018
[31]

Hussain, S

I. Hussain, S. Jafari, D. Ghosh, M. Perc,Synchronization and chimeras in a network of pho- tosensitive FitzHugh-Nagumo neurons, Nonlinear Dynamics,104(2021), 2711-2721

work page 2021
[32]

Lin et al,Neural bursting and synchronization emulated by neural networks and circuits, IEEE Trans

H. Lin et al,Neural bursting and synchronization emulated by neural networks and circuits, IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems I,68(2021), 3397-3410

work page 2021
[33]

Wu et al,Dynamic learning of synchronization in coupled nonlinear systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10192-y, 2024

Y. Wu et al,Dynamic learning of synchronization in coupled nonlinear systems, Nonlinear Dynamics, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-024-10192-y, 2024

work page doi:10.1007/s11071-024-10192-y 2024
[34]

You,Global dynamics of diffusive Hindmarsh-Rose equations with memristors, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications,71(2023), 103827

Y. You,Global dynamics of diffusive Hindmarsh-Rose equations with memristors, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications,71(2023), 103827

work page 2023
[35]

You,Exponential Synchronization of Memristive Hindmarsh-Rose Neural Networks, Non- linear Analysis: Real World Applications,73(2023), 103909

Y. You,Exponential Synchronization of Memristive Hindmarsh-Rose Neural Networks, Non- linear Analysis: Real World Applications,73(2023), 103909

work page 2023
[36]

Y. You, J. Tian, J. Tu,Synchronization of memristive FitzHugh-Nagumo neural networks, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation,125(2023), 107405

work page 2023
[37]

You and J

Y. You and J. Tu,Dynamics and synchronization of weakly coupled memristive reaction- diffusion neural networks, Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations,22(2025), 1-28

work page 2025
[38]

Cornejo-Perez, R

O. Cornejo-Perez, R. Femat,Unidirectional synchronization of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals,25(2005), 43-53

work page 2005
[39]

L. Tian, D. Li, X. Sun,Nonlinear-estimator-based robust synchronization of Hodgkin-Huxley neurons, Neurocomputing,72(2008), 186-196

work page 2008
[40]

Batista, R.L

C. Batista, R.L. Viana, F. Ferrari, S.R. Lopes, A.M. Batista, J. Coninck,Control of bursting synchronization in networks of Hodgkin-Huxley-type neurons with chemical synapses, Physical Review E,87(2013), 042713

work page 2013
[41]

Prado, S.R

T. Prado, S.R. Lopes, C. Batista, J. Kurths, R.L. Viana,Synchronization of bursting Hodgkin- Huxley-type neurons in clustered networks, Physical Review E,90(2014), 032818

work page 2014
[42]

Bonabi, H

S.Y. Bonabi, H. Asgharian, S. Safari, M.N. Ahmadabadi,EPGA implementation of a biological neural network based on the Hodgkin-Huxley neuron model, Frontiers in Neuroscience,8(2014), 00379

work page 2014
[43]

F. Han, Z. Wang, Y. Du, X. Sun, B. Zhang,Robust synchronization of bursting Hodgkin-Huxley neuronal systems, International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics,70(2015), 105-111

work page 2015
[44]

X. Yang, G. Zhang, X. Li and D. Wang,The synchronization behaviors of coupled fractional- order neuronal networks under electromagnetic radiation, Symmetry,13(2021), 2204

work page 2021
[45]

Ambrosio, M.A

B. Ambrosio, M.A. Aziz-Alaoui, A. Oujbara,Synchronization in a three level network of all-to- all periodically forced Hodgkin-Huxley reaction-diffusion equations, Mathematics,12(9) (2024),

work page 2024
[46]

https://doi.org/10.3390/math12091382. 25

work page doi:10.3390/math12091382
[47]

Saghafi, P

S. Saghafi, P. Sanaei,Dynamic entrainment: A deep learning and data-driven process approach for synchronization in the Hodgkin-Huxley model, Chaos,34(10) (2024), 103124

work page 2024
[48]

L. Wei, D. Li, J. Zhang,Dynamics and synchronization of the Morris-Lecar model with field coupling subject to electromagnetic excitation, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Nu- merical Simulation,140(2025), 108457

work page 2025
[49]

Vivekanandan, M

G. Vivekanandan, M. Mehrabbeik, H. Natiq, K. Rajagopal, E. Tlelo-Cuautle,Fractional-order memristive Wilson neuron model: dynamical analysis and synchronization patterns, Mathe- matics,10(2022), 2827

work page 2022
[50]

Y. Qi, A.L. Watts, J.W. Kim, P.A. Robinson,Firing patterns in a conductance-based neuron model: bifurcation, phase diagram, and chaos, Biological Cybernetics,107(2013), 15-24

work page 2013
[51]

Q. Xu, Z. Ju, S. Ding, C. Feng, M. Chen, B. Bao,Electromagnetic induction effects on electrical activity within a memristive Wilson neuron model, Cognitive Neurodunamics,16(2022), 1221- 1231

work page 2022
[52]

Rinzel,Excitation dynamics: insights from simplified membrane models, Federation Pro- ceedings,44(1985), 2944-2946

J. Rinzel,Excitation dynamics: insights from simplified membrane models, Federation Pro- ceedings,44(1985), 2944-2946

work page 1985
[53]

Connors, M.J

B.W. Connors, M.J. Gutnick, D.A. Prince,Electrophysiological properties of neocortical neu- rons in vitro, J. Neurophysiology,48(1982), 1302-1320

work page 1982
[54]

Rinzel, G.B

J. Rinzel, G.B. Ermentrout,Analysis of neural excitability and oscillations, in Methods in Neuronal Modelling: from Synapses to Networks, (C. Koch and L. Segev eds), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1989, pp. 135-169

work page 1989
[55]

Schultens, D

J.Engel, H.A. Schultens, D. Schild,Small conductance potassium channels cause an activity- dependent spike frequency adaptation and make the transfer function of neuron logarithmic, Biophysical Journal,76(1999), 1310-1319

work page 1999
[56]

Chepyzhov, M.I

V.V. Chepyzhov, M.I. Vishik,Attractors for Equations of Mathematical Physics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002

work page 2002
[57]

G.R. Sell, Y. You,Dynamics of Evolutionary Equations, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol- ume143, Springer, New York, 2002

work page 2002
[58]

Diethelm,The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010

K. Diethelm,The Analysis of Fractional Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010

work page 2010
[59]

Jin.Fractional Differential Equations -An Approach via Fractional Derivatives, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2021

B. Jin.Fractional Differential Equations -An Approach via Fractional Derivatives, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2021

work page 2021
[60]

You,Robust synchronization of time-fractional memristive Hopfield neural networks, Ax- ioms,15(1) (2026), 37

Y. You,Robust synchronization of time-fractional memristive Hopfield neural networks, Ax- ioms,15(1) (2026), 37. University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA Email address:yygwmp@gmail.com

work page 2026