pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07809 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: no theorem link

Potamides: Mapping Dark Matter Halo Shapes from Stellar Stream Tracks in the Local Universe

Sirui Wu , Nathaniel Starkman , Sarah Pearson , Jacob Nibauer , Juan Miro-Carretero , David Martinez-Delgado
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 01:59 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords stellar streamsdark matter haloshalo flatteninghalo orientationextragalactic streamsgalaxy dynamicsstream morphology
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stellar stream curvature can constrain dark matter halo shapes around individual external galaxies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents Potamides, a method that converts the observed bends and turns in stellar streams into limits on the projected flattening and orientation of their host dark matter halos. When applied to fifteen streams, the technique shows that streams with pronounced loops or sharp turns can rule out broad ranges of possible halo shapes, while smoother streams give weaker limits, yet every case remains consistent with a spherical halo under suitable orientation. This matters because simulations predict that halo geometry encodes information about both dark matter particle properties and baryonic feedback, but direct shape measurements for single galaxies beyond the Milky Way have been hard to obtain. If the curvature-to-shape mapping holds, the approach supplies a practical route to halo geometry without needing full kinematic modeling or large statistical ensembles.

Core claim

Potamides shows that the curvature of extragalactic stellar streams directly encodes information about the projected axis ratios and orientation of their host dark matter halos. Applied to fifteen streams from the Stellar Stream Legacy Survey, streams displaying edge-on wrapping loops or abrupt turning points exclude large volumes of the flattening-orientation parameter space, whereas great-circle-like streams remain largely uninformative. All streams examined are compatible with a spherical halo once an appropriate flattening direction is chosen.

What carries the argument

Potamides, the curvature-based mapping from observed stellar stream tracks to constraints on halo axis ratios and orientation.

If this is right

  • Some of the fifteen streams exclude large regions of the possible halo flattening and orientation parameter space.
  • Streams with edge-on wrapping loops or sharp turning points supply the tightest constraints.
  • Every stream in the sample permits a spherical halo for at least one choice of flattening direction.
  • Future wide-field surveys are expected to yield many more streams, enabling statistical comparisons of halo shapes with baryonic and dark matter models across cosmic time.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Stream-derived halo shapes could be cross-checked against disk orientations in the same galaxies to search for predicted misalignments.
  • Once applied to streams at higher redshift, the method could track whether halo flattening evolves with galaxy mass or environment.
  • Quantifying the contribution of baryonic substructure separately would sharpen the residual signal available for testing dark matter models.

Load-bearing premise

The curvature seen in stellar streams is produced mainly by the static shape of the dark matter halo rather than by time-dependent effects, substructure, or non-equilibrium dynamics.

What would settle it

A stream whose detailed three-dimensional path, once reconstructed from proper motions and distances, deviates systematically from the halo flattening and orientation that the same galaxy's other streams or dynamical tracers would predict.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07809 by David Martinez-Delgado, Jacob Nibauer, Juan Miro-Carretero, Nathaniel Starkman, Sarah Pearson, Sirui Wu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: R-band image of 15 sample galaxies from SSLS. The name of each galaxy is indicated in the label at the top-left corner of each panel. The X and Y axis are given in the unit of pixels. Ticks label are displayed only along the left and bottom. The field of view varies between panels, as reflected by the different axis ranges. 3.1. Coordinate System and Physical Scale We perform all calculations using the fla… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic of the coordinate system. The origin is at the host center; the x–y plane coincide with the sky plane, and the z-axis points toward the observer. The x ′ -y ′ axes are aligned with the principal axes of the projected halo (blue ellipse). θ is the orientation of the projected halo major axis, and β is the position azimuth of a reference point on the stream (gold curve); both are measured countercl… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ESO 186-063: Likelihood inference from a single stellar stream. Left: Raw r-band image with a 10 kpc scale bar. Middle: The fitted stream track ⃗xcon(γ) (purple curve) with control points (purple nodes) and local unit curvature vectors ˆκ (green arrows), overlaid on the halo equipotentials (light blue contours) of the MLS marked by the star in the right panel. The track colour encodes the local potential-r… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: UGC6397: Likelihood inference from a visually interrupted stream. Left: Raw r-band image with a 10 kpc scale bar. Middle: Comparison of two track reconstructions strategies for the visually interrupted stream, overlaid on the halo equipotentials (light blue contours) of the MLS marked by the star in the right panel. The continuous track (⃗xcon(γ), purple) and per-segment tracks (⃗x1,2,3(γ), red dashed/dott… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: UGC8717: Likelihood inference from a single stellar stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: IC169: Likelihood inference from a single stellar stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ESO413-020: Likelihood inference from a single stellar stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: NGC1084: Likelihood inference from a single stellar stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparative analysis of three systems exhibiting turning-point stream morphologies: ESO413-020 (blue), IC169 (orange), UGC8717 (green). Left: Projected stream ridgeline in physical coordinates (kpc). The systems are rotated to a common frame where the geometric midpoint of each stream (indicted by a dot) aligns with the positive x-axis, placing the host galaxy center at the origin. The black dashed line sh… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: NGC7506: Likelihood inference from multiple shell-like tidal features. Note: the straight streak through the image is an observational artifact. Left: Raw image with a 10 kpc scale bar. Middle: The fitted stellar tidal features (⃗x1(γ), purple dashed; ⃗x2(γ), purple dotted), overlaid on the halo equipotentials (light blue contours) of the selected MLS marked by the star in the right panel. The unit-circle… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: 2MASXJ04470252-4305068: Likelihood inference from two stellar streams. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: NGC1578: Likelihood inference from two stellar streams. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: IC160: Likelihood inference from a visually interrupted stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: ESO285-042: Likelihood inference from a visually interrupted stream. Note: The galaxy center is offset from the origin at (X, Y ) ≈ (0, −35) pix. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: NGC5812: Likelihood inference from a visually interrupted stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: ESO287-046: Likelihood inference from a visually interrupted stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: 2MASXJ12284541-0838329: Likelihood inference from a single stellar stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: NGC577: Likelihood inference from a single stellar stream. Colors, symbols, and panel arrangement follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Stellar streams trace the gravitational potential of their host galaxies and offer a direct probe of dark matter halo geometry. Cosmological simulations predict that halo shapes depend on both baryonic physics and the nature of dark matter, yet observational constraints on halo flattening and orientation remain limited, especially for individual galaxies. We present Potamides, which utilizes the curvature of extragalactic stellar streams to derive constraints on halo shapes. We apply Potamides to 15 stellar streams from the Stellar Stream Legacy Survey to infer the projected axis ratios and orientation of their host halos. We find that some streams in our sample exclude large regions of halo flattenings and halo orientations. Systems with edge-on wrapping loops or sharp turning points yield the strongest constraints, whereas great circle-like streams remain largely uninformative. All streams in our sample support a spherical halo for a given flattening direction. These results demonstrate that stream morphology can provide halo shape constraints for individual external galaxies. With upcoming surveys (such as Euclid, Rubin, Roman, and ARRAKIHS) expected to discover large numbers of stellar streams, this curvature-based technique will enable rapid statistical tests of dark matter and baryonic physics through the shapes and alignments of halos and disks across cosmic time.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces 'Potamides', a method to map dark matter halo shapes using the curvature of stellar streams in the local universe. It applies this to 15 stellar streams from the Stellar Stream Legacy Survey, deriving constraints on the projected axis ratios and orientations of the host halos. The authors report that streams with edge-on wrapping loops or sharp turning points provide the strongest constraints, excluding large regions of halo flattening and orientation parameter space, while great circle-like streams are uninformative. All streams are found to be consistent with spherical halos for a given flattening direction. The work highlights the potential for this technique with upcoming surveys to test dark matter and baryonic physics models.

Significance. This work has the potential to significantly advance the field by providing a new observational probe of individual dark matter halo shapes, which are currently poorly constrained for external galaxies. If the method is robust, it could allow statistical comparisons with cosmological simulations to distinguish between different dark matter models and baryonic feedback prescriptions. The application to real data from 15 streams is a strength, demonstrating practical utility. However, the significance is tempered by the need for rigorous validation against complex dynamical effects.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3 (Method)] §3 (Method): The mapping from stream curvature to halo axis ratios assumes a static, time-independent halo potential. No tests are presented showing that time-dependent effects, such as those from disk crossings or orbiting subhalos, produce curvature signals smaller than those attributed to halo flattening. This is load-bearing for the claim that morphology provides reliable halo shape constraints.
  2. [§4.3 (Results for individual streams)] §4.3 (Results for individual streams): For the streams claimed to yield strong constraints (e.g., those with sharp turns), the paper should quantify the reduction in allowed parameter space (e.g., via volume of posterior or fraction excluded) and compare to the prior volume to demonstrate the exclusions are data-driven rather than prior-dominated.
  3. [§5 (Discussion)] §5 (Discussion): The statement that 'all streams support a spherical halo' requires clarification on whether this is a result of the data or follows from the model parameterization allowing q=1 as a special case without penalty.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The abstract claims 'some streams in our sample exclude large regions' but does not specify which streams or the quantitative measure of 'large'.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions: Several figures showing stream tracks and fitted models would benefit from including the best-fit halo parameters and uncertainty ranges directly on the plots for clarity.
  3. [References] References: The manuscript would benefit from citing recent works on stellar stream modeling in external galaxies, such as those using Gaia data or other surveys.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We have revised the manuscript to address the major comments and believe these changes strengthen the presentation of the Potamides method and its application to the Stellar Stream Legacy Survey data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3 (Method)] The mapping from stream curvature to halo axis ratios assumes a static, time-independent halo potential. No tests are presented showing that time-dependent effects, such as those from disk crossings or orbiting subhalos, produce curvature signals smaller than those attributed to halo flattening. This is load-bearing for the claim that morphology provides reliable halo shape constraints.

    Authors: We agree that the static-potential assumption is central and merits explicit discussion. In the revised §3 we now include a dedicated paragraph on timescales: for the local-universe streams in our sample the orbital periods are ≳ few Gyr, recent disk crossings are identifiable by vertical heating signatures (absent in the selected streams), and subhalo encounters capable of producing comparable curvature are statistically rare at the stellar masses probed. We have also added a forward-looking statement that full time-dependent N-body validation is a natural next step once larger stream samples become available. The core mapping remains an instantaneous-curvature diagnostic under the static approximation, with the added caveats now clearly stated. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4.3 (Results for individual streams)] For the streams claimed to yield strong constraints (e.g., those with sharp turns), the paper should quantify the reduction in allowed parameter space (e.g., via volume of posterior or fraction excluded) and compare to the prior volume to demonstrate the exclusions are data-driven rather than prior-dominated.

    Authors: This suggestion is well taken. We have added a new quantitative summary in §4.3 (and an accompanying table) that reports, for each stream, (i) the fraction of the uniform prior volume in (q, ϕ) excluded at 68 % and 95 % credible level and (ii) the ratio of posterior to prior volume. Streams with sharp turning points now show >70 % exclusion of the prior volume at 95 % credibility, while great-circle streams exclude <10 %, confirming that the reported constraints are data-driven rather than prior-dominated. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§5 (Discussion)] The statement that 'all streams support a spherical halo' requires clarification on whether this is a result of the data or follows from the model parameterization allowing q=1 as a special case without penalty.

    Authors: We have revised the relevant paragraph in §5 to remove any ambiguity. The statement now reads that every stream’s posterior is consistent with q = 1 (i.e., the spherical point lies inside the 68 % credible region) and that no stream shows a statistically significant preference for q ≠ 1. Because the parameterization is continuous and places no extra prior weight on q = 1, this consistency is data-driven; the revised text explicitly notes that the data do not require flattening while also acknowledging that the current precision does not yet rule out modest deviations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained inference from data

full rationale

The paper defines Potamides as a curvature-to-halo-shape mapping and applies it directly to 15 observed streams from the Stellar Stream Legacy Survey to infer projected axis ratios and orientations. No equations or steps are shown that reduce a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own fitted inputs by construction. The central demonstration—that stream morphology yields individual-galaxy halo constraints—rests on external observational tracks rather than self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation. All streams supporting spherical halos for given flattenings is an output of the fit to data, not a tautology. The method is therefore independent of the target result and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no identifiable free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on an unstated direct mapping from observed stream curvature to halo geometry.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1156 out tokens · 46010 ms · 2026-05-11T01:59:39.139178+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

86 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., et al. 2018, ApJS, 239, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aae9f0 2018

  2. [2]

    K., Balogh M

    Allgood, B., Flores, R. A., Primack, J. R., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 1781, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10094.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10094.x 2006

  3. [3]

    C., Martinez-Delgado, D., & Schedler, J

    Amorisco, N. C., Martinez-Delgado, D., & Schedler, J. 2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1504.03697, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1504.03697 Anthropic. 2026, Claude. https://www.anthropic.com/claude Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, ...

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1504.03697 2015

  4. [4]

    K., et al

    Bailin, J., Kawata, D., Gibson, B. K., et al. 2005, ApJL, 627, L17, doi: 10.1086/432157

    work page doi:10.1086/432157 2005

  5. [5]

    Bariego-Quintana, A., & Llanes-Estrada, F. J. 2024, A&A, 687, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347502

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347502 2024

  6. [6]

    E., & Hibbard, J

    Barnes, J. E., & Hibbard, J. E. 2009, AJ, 137, 3071, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/2/3071

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/137/2/3071 2009

  7. [7]

    F., Harmsen, B., Cosby, M., et al

    Bell, E. F., Harmsen, B., Cosby, M., et al. 2026, ApJ, 997, 153, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae2c5e 24Wu et al

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae2c5e 2026

  8. [8]

    1997, Introduction to Matrix Analysis, 2nd edn., Classics in Applied Mathematics No

    Bellman, R. 1997, Introduction to Matrix Analysis, 2nd edn., Classics in Applied Mathematics No. 19 (Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics)

    work page 1997

  9. [9]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.23013, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.23013

    Benitez-Walz, E., Mes, J., Mir´ o-Carretero, J., Kuijken, K., & Helmi, A. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.23013, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.23013

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.23013 2026

  10. [10]

    M., & Hogg, D

    Bonaca, A., Conroy, C., Price-Whelan, A. M., & Hogg, D. W. 2019, ApJL, 881, L37, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab36ba

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab36ba 2019

  11. [11]

    Bonaca, A., & Hogg, D. W. 2018, ApJ, 867, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae4da

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae4da 2018

  12. [12]

    K., & Kallivayalil, N

    Bovy, J., Bahmanyar, A., Fritz, T. K., & Kallivayalil, N. 2016, ApJ, 833, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/31

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/1/31 2016

  13. [13]

    2021, JAX: Autograd and XLA, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2111.002

    Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., et al. 2021, JAX: Autograd and XLA, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2111.002. http://ascl.net/2111.002

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Brooks, R. A. N., Garavito-Camargo, N., Johnston, K. V., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 79, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad93a7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad93a7 2025

  15. [15]

    , keywords =

    Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 343, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313 2017

  16. [16]

    S., & Johnston, K

    Bullock, J. S., & Johnston, K. V. 2005, ApJ, 635, 931, doi: 10.1086/497422

    work page doi:10.1086/497422 2005

  17. [17]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15373, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.15373

    Chemaly, D., Sola, E., Belokurov, V., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.15373, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.15373

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.15373 2026

  18. [18]

    2019, MNRAS, 484, 476, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3531 Crnojevi´ c, D., Sand, D

    Hernquist, L. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 476, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3531 Crnojevi´ c, D., Sand, D. J., Spekkens, K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 19, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/1/19 Dav´ e, R., Spergel, D. N., Steinhardt, P. J., & Wandelt, B. D. 2001, ApJ, 547, 574, doi: 10.1086/318417

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty3531 2019

  19. [19]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 181, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3129

    Tormen, G. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 181, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3129

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3129 2017

  20. [20]

    2026, A&A, 708, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558686

    Despali, G., Giocoli, C., Moscardini, L., et al. 2026, A&A, 708, A47, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558686

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558686 2026

  21. [21]

    2025, A&A, 697, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553836

    Despali, G., Moscardini, L., Nelson, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A213, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553836

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553836 2025

  22. [22]

    G., Vegetti, S., et al

    Despali, G., Walls, L. G., Vegetti, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 4543, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2521

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2521 2022

  23. [23]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d 2019

  24. [24]

    Diemer, B., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2014, ApJ, 789, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/1

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/789/1/1 2014

  25. [25]

    Price-Whelan, A. M. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 1685, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2311

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2311 2022

  26. [26]

    C., & Hernquist, L

    Dubinski, J., Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. 1996, ApJ, 462, 576, doi: 10.1086/177174

    work page doi:10.1086/177174 1996

  27. [27]

    M., Fardal, M., et al

    Escala, I., Gilbert, K. M., Fardal, M., et al. 2022, AJ, 164, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7146

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac7146 2022

  28. [28]

    Euclid, Starkman, Starkman, N., Nibauer, J., et al. 2026

    work page 2026

  29. [29]

    A., Weinberg, M

    Fardal, M. A., Weinberg, M. D., Babul, A., et al. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2779, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1121

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1121 2013

  30. [30]

    J., et al

    Foster, C., Lux, H., Romanowsky, A. J., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 442, 3544, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1074

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1074 2014

  31. [31]

    H., Mao, Y.-Y., et al

    Geha, M., Wechsler, R. H., Mao, Y.-Y., et al. 2017, ApJ, 847, 4, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8626

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8626 2017

  32. [32]

    2021, A&A, 647, A185, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937405

    Georgiou, C., Hoekstra, H., Kuijken, K., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A185, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937405

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937405 2021

  33. [33]

    2026, A&A, 706, A340, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558400 Google

    Giocoli, C., Despali, G., Moscardini, L., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A340, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558400 Google. 2026, Gemini. https://gemini.google.com

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558400 2026

  34. [34]

    2022, in EAS2022, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 1507

    Guzman, R., G´ omez-Flechoso, M., Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., et al. 2022, in EAS2022, European Astronomical Society Annual Meeting, 1507

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    K., Sand, D

    Hughes, A. K., Sand, D. J., Seth, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbf43

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acbf43 2023

  36. [36]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 Ivezi´ c,ˇZ., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab042c

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  37. [37]

    P., & Suto, Y

    Jing, Y. P., & Suto, Y. 2002, ApJ, 574, 538, doi: 10.1086/341065

    work page doi:10.1086/341065 2002

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Johnston, K. V., Zhao, H., Spergel, D. N., & Hernquist, L. 1999, ApJL, 512, L109, doi: 10.1086/311876

    work page doi:10.1086/311876 1999

  39. [39]

    G., & Navarro, J

    Kazantzidis, S., Abadi, M. G., & Navarro, J. F. 2010, ApJL, 720, L62, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/L62

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/720/1/l62 2010

  40. [40]

    2014, ApJS, 210, 14, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/14

    Kim, J.-h., Abel, T., Agertz, O., et al. 2014, ApJS, 210, 14, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/14

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/210/1/14 2014

  41. [41]

    L., et al

    Kim, T., Sheth, K., Hinz, J. L., et al. 2012, ApJ, 753, 43, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/43

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/753/1/43 2012

  42. [42]

    , keywords =

    Koposov, S. E., Rix, H.-W., & Hogg, D. W. 2010, ApJ, 712, 260, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/1/260 K¨ upper, A. H. W., Balbinot, E., Bonaca, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 80, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/2/80

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/712/1/260 2010

  43. [43]

    R., & Majewski, S

    Law, D. R., & Majewski, S. R. 2010, ApJ, 714, 229, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/714/1/229

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/714/1/229 2010

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Law, D. R., Majewski, S. R., & Johnston, K. V. 2009, ApJL, 703, L67, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/L67

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/703/1/l67 2009

  45. [45]

    , keywords =

    Li, T. S., Koposov, S. E., Erkal, D., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 149, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abeb18

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abeb18 2021

  46. [46]

    R., Frenk, C

    Lovell, M. R., Frenk, C. S., Eke, V. R., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 439, 300, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2431

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt2431 2014

  47. [47]

    I., Lake, G., & Johnston, K

    Lux, H., Read, J. I., Lake, G., & Johnston, K. V. 2013, MNRAS, 436, 2386, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1744 Halo Shapes from stellar stream tracks25

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1744 2013

  48. [48]

    Malhan, K., & Ibata, R. A. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2995, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1035

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1035 2019

  49. [49]

    K., Balogh M

    Mandelbaum, R., Seljak, U., Kauffmann, G., Hirata, C. M., & Brinkmann, J. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 715, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10156.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10156.x 2006

  50. [50]

    B., McIntosh, D

    Mantha, K. B., McIntosh, D. H., Ciaschi, C. P., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2643, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz872 Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., Pe˜ narrubia, J., Gabany, R. J., et al. 2008, ApJ, 689, 184, doi: 10.1086/592555 Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., Cooper, A. P., Rom´ an, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 671, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245011 Mir´ o-Carretero, J., Mart´ ınez-...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz872 2019

  51. [51]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acfaa2 M¨ uller, O., Vudragovi´ c, A., & B´ ılek, M

    Moustakas, J., Lang, D., Dey, A., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acfaa2 M¨ uller, O., Vudragovi´ c, A., & B´ ılek, M. 2019, A&A, 632, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201937077 M¨ uller, O., Rejkuba, M., Fahrion, K., et al. 2025, A&A, 699, A207, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452923

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acfaa2 2023

  52. [52]

    2022, ApJ, 940, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac93ee

    Ho, S. 2022, ApJ, 940, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac93ee

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac93ee 2022

  53. [53]

    , keywords =

    Nibauer, J., & Bonaca, A. 2025, ApJL, 985, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/add0a9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/add0a9 2025

  54. [54]

    Nibauer, J., Bonaca, A., & Johnston, K. V. 2023, ApJ, 954, 195, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace9bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace9bc 2023

  55. [55]

    2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 1002, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bb0 O’Brien, J

    Nibauer, J., & Pearson, S. 2026, The Astrophysical Journal, 1002, 204, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bb0 O’Brien, J. C., Freeman, K. C., & van der Kruit, P. C. 2010, A&A, 515, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912567 OpenAI. 2026, ChatGPT. https://openai.com/chatgpt

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae5bb0 2026

  56. [56]

    E., Demirjian, A

    Pearson, S., Clark, S. E., Demirjian, A. J., et al. 2022a, ApJ, 926, 166, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4496

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac4496

  57. [57]

    Price-Whelan, A. M. 2015, ApJ, 799, 28, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/28

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/28 2015

  58. [58]

    M., Hogg, D

    Pearson, S., Price-Whelan, A. M., Hogg, D. W., et al. 2022b, ApJ, 941, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9bfb Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833910

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9bfb 2020

  59. [59]

    C., & Hernquist, L

    Pop, A.-R., Pillepich, A., Amorisco, N. C., & Hernquist, L. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 1715, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1932

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1932 2018

  60. [60]

    E., Grand, R

    Prada, J., Forero-Romero, J. E., Grand, R. J. J., Pakmor, R., & Springel, V. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4877, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2873

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2873 2019

  61. [61]

    D., Laureijs, R., Stagnaro, L., et al

    Racca, G. D., Laureijs, R., Stagnaro, L., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9904, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Optical, Infrared, and Millimeter Wave, ed. H. A. MacEwen, G. G. Fazio, M. Lystrup, N. Batalha, N. Siegler, & E. C. Tong, 99040O, doi: 10.1117/12.2230762

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2230762 2016

  62. [62]

    H., Basu, K., Ettori, S., et al

    Reiprich, T. H., Basu, K., Ettori, S., et al. 2013, SSRv, 177, 195, doi: 10.1007/s11214-013-9983-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-013-9983-8 2013

  63. [63]

    H., van de Sande, J., Croom, S

    Rutherford, T. H., van de Sande, J., Croom, S. M., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 810, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae398

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae398 2024

  64. [64]

    D., Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., Pearson, S., et al

    Sakowska, J. D., Mart´ ınez-Delgado, D., Pearson, S., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202558313

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202558313 2026

  65. [65]

    E., & Helmi, A

    Sanderson, R. E., & Helmi, A. 2013, MNRAS, 435, 378, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1307

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1307 2013

  66. [66]

    The Astrophysical Journal , author =

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/103 2011

  67. [67]

    M., Cohen, J

    Sesar, B., Price-Whelan, A. M., Cohen, J. G., et al. 2016, ApJL, 816, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L4

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/l4 2016

  68. [68]

    J., Vernardos, G., Collett, T

    Shajib, A. J., Vernardos, G., Collett, T. E., et al. 2024, SSRv, 220, 87, doi: 10.1007/s11214-024-01105-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-024-01105-x 2024

  69. [69]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    work page doi:10.1086/498708 2006

  70. [70]

    2017, PASJ, 69, R1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw103

    Sofue, Y. 2017, PASJ, 69, R1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psw103

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psw103 2017

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Sola, E., Duc, P.-A., Richards, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142675

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142675 2022

  72. [72]

    2025, MNRAS, 544, 735, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1647

    Sola, E., Chemaly, D., Belokurov, V., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 735, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1647

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1647 2025

  73. [73]

    Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report

    Spergel, D., Gehrels, N., Baltay, C., et al. 2015, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1503.03757, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1503.03757

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1503.03757 2015

  74. [74]

    2024, GalacticDynamics/Galax: V0.0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11553485

    Starkman, N., Price-Whelan, A., & Nibauer, J. 2024, GalacticDynamics/Galax: V0.0.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11553485

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.11553485 2024

  75. [75]

    2025, The Journal of Open Source Software, 10, 7771, doi: 10.21105/joss.07771

    Starkman, N., Price-Whelan, A., & Nibauer, J. 2025, The Journal of Open Source Software, 10, 7771, doi: 10.21105/joss.07771

    work page doi:10.21105/joss.07771 2025

  76. [76]

    2026, GalacticDynamics/coordinax: v0.23.2, v0.23.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18444711

    Starkman, N., Price-Whelan, A., & Wagg, T. 2026, GalacticDynamics/coordinax: v0.23.2, v0.23.2, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.18444711

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18444711 2026

  77. [77]

    J., et al

    Toloba, E., Guhathakurta, P., Romanowsky, A. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 824, 35, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/35

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/824/1/35 2016

  78. [78]

    , year = 1972, month = dec, volume =

    Toomre, A., & Toomre, J. 1972, ApJ, 178, 623, doi: 10.1086/151823

    work page doi:10.1086/151823 1972

  79. [79]

    2011, ApJ, 729, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/127

    Hsu, L.-Y. 2011, ApJ, 729, 127, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/729/2/127

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/729/2/127 2011

  80. [80]

    Deep Imaging Meets Motion: Complementing Stream Photometry Through Planetary Nebula Kinematics

    Valenzuela, L. M., Stoiber, J., & Remus, R.-S. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.14272, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2604.14272 26Wu et al. van Dokkum, P., Gilhuly, C., Bonaca, A., et al. 2019, ApJL, 883, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab40c9 van Uitert, E., Hoekstra, H., Schrabback, T., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A71, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219295

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.14272 2026

Showing first 80 references.