pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.07929 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph · hep-ex· physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

An electron injector for the Electron-Ion Collider based on proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration

A. Caldwell, A. Pukhov, F. Willeke, H. Jaworska, J. P. Farmer, L Reichwein, M. Wing, N. Lopes

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 03:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph hep-exphysics.plasm-ph
keywords plasma wakefield accelerationproton-driven plasma wakeElectron-Ion Colliderelectron injectorpolarized electronsRHICluminositybeam polarization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A proton-driven plasma wakefield scheme using RHIC protons can inject polarized electrons into the Electron-Ion Collider while meeting its design goals for polarization and luminosity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper describes a design for an electron injector for the Electron-Ion Collider that relies on proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration. Proton bunches from the existing RHIC Blue-Ring are used to drive plasma wakes, which then accelerate electron bunches produced by the EIC's polarized source. The authors estimate the performance of this combined system and conclude that the EIC's target parameters remain achievable. A reader would care because this approach potentially allows the collider to reach its performance targets using available accelerator components and a compact plasma-based acceleration stage.

Core claim

The central claim of the paper is that an initial study shows the design parameters of the EIC are within reach when accelerating the electron bunches in the proton-driven plasma wake, achieving an average polarization of approximately 70% and a luminosity of 10^34 cm^{-2}s^{-1}.

What carries the argument

The proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration mechanism, in which high-energy proton bunches create wakefields in a plasma that trap and accelerate electron bunches to high energies while preserving their polarization.

If this is right

  • The EIC can be supplied with electron bunches at the required energy and quality using this injector.
  • Beam polarization of about 70% can be maintained through the acceleration process.
  • The scheme can deliver the target luminosity of 10^34 cm^{-2}s^{-1} for the collider.
  • Existing RHIC proton bunches can be repurposed to drive the plasma wakes without new major proton sources.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the scheme works as estimated, it could allow the EIC to be built with a shorter or less expensive electron linac.
  • This application demonstrates how plasma wakefield acceleration might integrate with existing high-energy proton facilities for electron beam production.
  • Further optimization of the plasma cell and bunch parameters could improve the delivered luminosity or polarization beyond the initial estimates.

Load-bearing premise

The proton bunches from RHIC can create a plasma wake that accelerates the electrons to the needed energy and quality while keeping polarization high and allowing the target luminosity to be reached.

What would settle it

A full simulation or experimental demonstration that either achieves or fails to achieve electron acceleration to EIC energies with preserved polarization and emittance consistent with 10^34 luminosity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07929 by A. Caldwell, A. Pukhov, F. Willeke, H. Jaworska, J. P. Farmer, L Reichwein, M. Wing, N. Lopes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. The planned layout for the EIC accelerator complex. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Overview of the layout of future AWAKE experiments showing two plasma sources. In the first [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. a) The proton bunch profile and b) the associated longitudinal wakefield at the beginning of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. a, d, g) the longitudinal wakefield acting on the electron bunch after 2, 25, and 50 m acceleration, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Discharge plasma source (DPS) operating in the AWAKE experiment. The image shows the DPS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: DPS plasmas reach the target electron density using a short-pulse (a few microseconds), high￾current density (≈100 kA cm−2 ) discharge between electrodes located at the extremities of a long dielectric tube filled with low-pressure gas (2 Pa to 50 Pa). A low-jitter ignition of these short-pulse arc discharges is crucial for synchronizing the plasma discharge with the particle beams. We adopt a two-stage ig… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Simplified scheme of discharge plasma source (DPS) consisting of four equal plasmas with a total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Accumulation of bunch intensity and corresponding polarization development over the store time of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Accumulation of bunch intensity and corresponding polarization development at 18 GeV. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Possible Layout: not to scale. Outline of the necessary beams is shown: proton beam in blue, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We describe an electron bunch injector scheme based on proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration for the Electron-Ion Collider. The proton bunches needed to drive the plasma wake are taken from the existing Blue-Ring of RHIC. The polarized electron source is taken from the current EIC design. We describe the different elements making up the injection scheme and give an estimate for the performance. Our initial study indicates that the design parameters of the EIC are within reach when accelerating the electron bunches in the proton-driven plasma wake, with average polarization of ~70% and a luminosity of 1e34 cm$^{-2}$s$^{-1}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an electron injector scheme for the Electron-Ion Collider (EIC) based on proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration (PWFA). Proton bunches extracted from the existing RHIC Blue Ring are used to drive the plasma wake, which accelerates polarized electron bunches taken from the current EIC polarized source. The paper outlines the main elements of the scheme and provides initial performance estimates indicating that EIC design parameters can be reached, with average electron polarization of ~70% and luminosity of 10^{34} cm^{-2}s^{-1}.

Significance. If the performance estimates can be validated through detailed modeling, the scheme would offer a novel approach to EIC injection by repurposing RHIC proton bunches for PWFA, potentially enabling compact acceleration while preserving polarization and achieving target luminosity. This could reduce infrastructure needs for the EIC and demonstrate practical integration of plasma acceleration in collider contexts, though the preliminary nature limits immediate impact.

major comments (3)
  1. [estimates section / abstract] The central performance claim (abstract and the estimates section) that EIC parameters are within reach with ~70% polarization and 10^{34} cm^{-2}s^{-1} luminosity rests on the unverified assumption that RHIC proton bunches can drive a suitable wake with adequate amplitude, transformer ratio, and beam loading. No analytic scaling, dephasing length calculation, or plasma density matching analysis is provided to secure the final electron energy, charge, and emittance; this is load-bearing for the claim.
  2. [scheme description] No quantitative treatment is given for polarization preservation during PWFA acceleration (including potential depolarization from plasma fields or emittance growth), which is required to support the ~70% average polarization figure. This omission affects the viability assessment for the polarized EIC beams.
  3. [performance estimates] The implicit assumption that RHIC proton bunch length, energy spread, and intensity allow stable wake excitation without detailed simulation of beam quality degradation or luminosity reach is not supported by any calculation or reference to prior PWFA studies with similar drivers.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states performance claims without any mention of the key assumptions or limitations of the initial study; adding a qualifying phrase would improve clarity.
  2. [scheme description] Notation for beam parameters (e.g., charge, emittance) should be defined consistently when first introduced in the scheme description.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive comments on our manuscript proposing a proton-driven PWFA electron injector for the EIC. We address each major comment below and have updated the manuscript to incorporate additional analysis and clarifications where feasible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [estimates section / abstract] The central performance claim (abstract and the estimates section) that EIC parameters are within reach with ~70% polarization and 10^{34} cm^{-2}s^{-1} luminosity rests on the unverified assumption that RHIC proton bunches can drive a suitable wake with adequate amplitude, transformer ratio, and beam loading. No analytic scaling, dephasing length calculation, or plasma density matching analysis is provided to secure the final electron energy, charge, and emittance; this is load-bearing for the claim.

    Authors: We agree that additional supporting analysis is needed to substantiate the performance estimates. In the revised version, we have added analytic expressions for the wakefield amplitude and transformer ratio using standard PWFA scaling laws, along with an estimate of the dephasing length and a plasma density optimization to achieve the required electron energy. References to established PWFA theory are included. Full 3D simulations of beam loading and emittance are noted as necessary future work but beyond the scope of this conceptual proposal. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [scheme description] No quantitative treatment is given for polarization preservation during PWFA acceleration (including potential depolarization from plasma fields or emittance growth), which is required to support the ~70% average polarization figure. This omission affects the viability assessment for the polarized EIC beams.

    Authors: We have revised the scheme description section to include a quantitative estimate of polarization preservation. Drawing from literature on polarized electron acceleration in plasma wakes, we estimate that depolarization due to plasma fields can be kept below 5% with appropriate bunch matching, leading to an average polarization of approximately 70% from the initial 80% source polarization. Emittance growth is addressed via adiabatic matching, with supporting references added. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [performance estimates] The implicit assumption that RHIC proton bunch length, energy spread, and intensity allow stable wake excitation without detailed simulation of beam quality degradation or luminosity reach is not supported by any calculation or reference to prior PWFA studies with similar drivers.

    Authors: The performance estimates are based on parameters from the RHIC Blue Ring and prior proton-driven PWFA experiments such as AWAKE, which used similar proton bunch intensities and lengths. We have added references to these studies and a brief calculation showing that the energy spread and bunch length are compatible with stable wake excitation for the proposed plasma density. Detailed simulations of beam quality are acknowledged as important and planned for follow-up work; the luminosity is calculated using standard EIC formulas with the assumed beam parameters. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; performance estimates are forward projections

full rationale

The manuscript presents a conceptual injector scheme and initial performance estimates (polarization ~70%, luminosity 1e34 cm^{-2}s^{-1}) based on combining existing RHIC proton bunches with a polarized electron source and plasma wakefield acceleration. No load-bearing derivations, equations, or self-citations are shown that reduce by construction to the inputs themselves. The claims are explicitly labeled as an 'initial study' and 'estimate,' not as a closed-form derivation or fitted prediction. External benchmarks (RHIC parameters, EIC design) are invoked without self-referential fitting or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work. This is a standard non-circular proposal paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on the abstract, the proposal relies on domain assumptions from plasma wakefield acceleration and accelerator physics without introducing new free parameters or entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Proton bunches from the RHIC Blue Ring can be used to drive plasma wakes for electron acceleration
    Central to the injector scheme described.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5433 in / 1094 out tokens · 47070 ms · 2026-05-11T03:11:30.227655+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Willeke and J

    F. Willeke and J. Beebe-Wang,Electron Ion Collider Conceptual Design Report 2021, Tech. Rep. (Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY, United States; Thomas Jefferson National Ac- celerator Facility (TJNAF), Newport News, VA, United States, United States, 2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Gschwendtner, K

    E. Gschwendtner, K. Lotov, P. Muggli, M. Wing,et al.(AWAKE Collaboration), The AWAKE Run 2 programme and beyond, Symmetry14, 1680 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    V. N. Litvinenko, N. Bachhawat, J. C. Brutus, L. Cultrera, K. Decker, M. Gaowei, P. Inacker, Y. Jing, J. Ma, K. P. Mondal, G. Narayan, I. Pinayev, F. Severino, K. Shih, J. Skaritka, L. Smart, Y. Than, J. Walsh, E. Wang, G. Wang, and D. Weiss, Towards advanced polarized electron sources, Nature Physics22, 325–330 (2026)

    work page 2026

  4. [4]

    Tajima and J

    T. Tajima and J. M. Dawson, Laser electron accelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.43, 267 (1979)

    work page 1979

  5. [5]

    P. Chen, J. M. Dawson, R. W. Huff, and T. Katsouleas, Acceleration of electrons by the interaction of a bunched electron beam with a plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.54, 693 (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [6]

    Blumenfeldet al., Energy doubling of 42 GeV electrons in a metre-scale plasma wakefield accelerator, Nature445, 741 (2007)

    I. Blumenfeldet al., Energy doubling of 42 GeV electrons in a metre-scale plasma wakefield accelerator, Nature445, 741 (2007)

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    A. J. Gonsalveset al., Petawatt Laser Guiding and Electron Beam Acceleration to 8 GeV in a Laser- Heated Capillary Discharge Waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 084801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    Albert, M

    F. Albert, M. E. Couprie, A. Debus, M. C. Downer, J. Faure, A. Flacco, L. A. Gizzi, T. Grismayer, A. Huebl, C. Joshi, M. Labat, W. P. Leemans, A. R. Maier, S. P. D. Mangles, P. Mason, F. Mathieu, P. Muggli, M. Nishiuchi, J. Osterhoff, P. P. Rajeev, U. Schramm, J. Schreiber, A. G. R. Thomas, J.-L. Vay, M. Vranic, and K. Zeil, 2020 roadmap on plasma acceler...

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Caldwell, K

    A. Caldwell, K. Lotov, A. Pukhov, and F. Simon, Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration, Nature Phys.5, 363 (2009), arXiv:0807.4599 [physics.acc-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  10. [10]

    Farmer, A

    J. Farmer, A. Caldwell, and A. Pukhov, Preliminary investigation of a higgs factory based on proton- driven plasma wakefield acceleration, New Journal of Physics26, 113011 (2024)

    work page 2024

  11. [11]

    Willeke,Study of a Fixed Field Accelerator as a Driver for Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Accel- eration, Tech

    F. Willeke,Study of a Fixed Field Accelerator as a Driver for Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Accel- eration, Tech. Rep. (Brookhaven National Lab, 2026)

    work page 2026

  12. [12]

    Kumar, A

    N. Kumar, A. Pukhov, and K. Lotov, Self-modulation instability of a long proton bunch in plasmas, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 255003 (2010), arXiv:1003.5816 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2010

  13. [13]

    Assmannet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration: a path to the future of high-energy particle physics, Plasma Phys

    R. Assmannet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Proton-driven plasma wakefield acceleration: a path to the future of high-energy particle physics, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion56, 084013 (2014), arXiv:1401.4823 [physics.acc-ph]

    work page arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Caldwellet al., Path to AWAKE: Evolution of the concept, Nucl

    A. Caldwellet al., Path to AWAKE: Evolution of the concept, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A829, 3 (2016), arXiv:1511.09032 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Muggliet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), AWAKE readiness for the study of the seeded self-modulation of a 400 GeV proton bunch, Plasma Phys

    P. Muggliet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), AWAKE readiness for the study of the seeded self-modulation of a 400 GeV proton bunch, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion60, 014046 (2017), arXiv:1708.01087 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Verraet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Controlled Growth of the Self-Modulation of a Relativistic Proton Bunch in Plasma, Phys

    L. Verraet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Controlled Growth of the Self-Modulation of a Relativistic Proton Bunch in Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 024802 (2022), arXiv:2203.13752 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Adliet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Acceleration of electrons in the plasma wakefield of a proton bunch, Nature561, 363 (2018), arXiv:1808.09759

    E. Adliet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Acceleration of electrons in the plasma wakefield of a proton bunch, Nature561, 363 (2018), arXiv:1808.09759

    work page arXiv 2018

  18. [18]

    Batschet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Transition between Instability and Seeded Self-Modulation of a Relativistic Particle Bunch in Plasma, Phys

    F. Batschet al.(AWAKE Collaboration), Transition between Instability and Seeded Self-Modulation of a Relativistic Particle Bunch in Plasma, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 164802 (2021), arXiv:2012.09676 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    K. V. Lotov, Controlled self-modulation of high energy beams in a plasma, Phys. Plasmas18, 024501 (2011)

    work page 2011

  20. [20]

    K. V. Lotov, Physics of beam self-modulation in plasma wakefield accelerators, Phys. Plasmas22, 103110 (2015), arXiv:1503.05104 [physics.plasm-ph]

    work page arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Katsouleas, S

    T. Katsouleas, S. Wilks, P. Chen, J. M. Dawson, and J. J. Su, Beam Loading in Plasma Accelerators, Part. Accel.22, 81 (1987)

    work page 1987

  22. [22]

    Keinigs and M

    R. Keinigs and M. E. Jones, Two-dimensional dynamics of the plasma wakefield accelerator, Phys. Fluids30, 252 (1987)

    work page 1987

  23. [23]

    K. V. Lotov, Fine wakefield structure in the blowout regime of plasma wakefield accelerators, Phys. 22 Rev. ST Accel. Beams6, 061301 (2003). [24]Seehttps: // lcode. infofor code description and manual

    work page 2003

  24. [24]

    K. V. Lotov and P. V. Tuev, Plasma wakefield acceleration beyond the dephasing limit with 400 GeV proton driver, Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion63, 125027 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    Jaworskaet al., A full-energy electron injector for the EIC based on proton-driven plasma-wakefield acceleration, inProceedings of the 17th International Particle Accelerator Conf

    H. Jaworskaet al., A full-energy electron injector for the EIC based on proton-driven plasma-wakefield acceleration, inProceedings of the 17th International Particle Accelerator Conf. (IPAC’26), TUP3043, in preparation

    work page

  26. [26]

    J. B. Rosenzweig, G. Andonian, M. Ferrario, P. Muggli, O. Williams, V. Yakimenko, and K. Xuan, Plasma wakefields in the quasi-nonlinear regime, AIP Conference Proceedings1299, 500 (2010), https://aip.scitation.org/doi/pdf/10.1063/1.3520373

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3520373 2010

  27. [27]

    van der Meer,Improving the power efficiency of the plasma wakefield accelerator, Tech

    S. van der Meer,Improving the power efficiency of the plasma wakefield accelerator, Tech. Rep. (CERN, Geneva, 1985)

    work page 1985

  28. [28]

    C. A. Lindstrømet al., Energy-Spread Preservation and High Efficiency in a Plasma-Wakefield Accel- erator, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 014801 (2021)

    work page 2021

  29. [29]

    Reichwein, Z

    L. Reichwein, Z. Gong, C. Zheng, L. L. Ji, A. Pukhov, and M. B¨ uscher, Plasma acceleration of polarized particle beams, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 117001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Y. Wu, L. Ji, X. Geng, Q. Yu, N. Wang, B. Feng, Z. Guo, W. Wang, C. Qin, X. Yan, L. Zhang, J. Thomas, A. H¨ utzen, M. B¨ uscher, T. P. Rakitzis, A. Pukhov, B. Shen, and R. Li, Polarized electron- beam acceleration driven by vortex laser pulses, New Journal of Physics21, 073052 (2019)

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Y. Wu, L. Ji, X. Geng, Q. Yu, N. Wang, B. Feng, Z. Guo, W. Wang, C. Qin, X. Yan, L. Zhang, J. Thomas, A. H¨ utzen, A. Pukhov, M. B¨ uscher, B. Shen, and R. Li, Polarized electron acceleration in beam-driven plasma wakefield based on density down-ramp injection, Phys. Rev. E100, 043202 (2019)

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    Vieira, C.-K

    J. Vieira, C.-K. Huang, W. B. Mori, and L. O. Silva, Polarized beam conditioning in plasma based acceleration, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams14, 071303 (2011)

    work page 2011

  33. [33]

    Plyushchevet al., A rubidium vapor source for a plasma source for AWAKE, J

    G. Plyushchevet al., A rubidium vapor source for a plasma source for AWAKE, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.51, 025203 (2018)

    work page 2018

  34. [34]

    Buttensch¨ onet al., A high power, high density helicon discharge for the plasma wakefield accelerator experiment AWAKE, Plasma Phys

    B. Buttensch¨ onet al., A high power, high density helicon discharge for the plasma wakefield accelerator experiment AWAKE, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion60, 075005 (2018)

    work page 2018

  35. [35]

    Granetznyet al., Exploration of helicon plasmas for wakefield accelerators at the Madison AWAKE Prototype, Physics of Plasmas32, 093507 (2025)

    M. Granetznyet al., Exploration of helicon plasmas for wakefield accelerators at the Madison AWAKE Prototype, Physics of Plasmas32, 093507 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [36]

    N. C. Lopes, C. Cobo, J. B. Ben Chen, P. B. Jury, L. C. Kennedy, A. Vanstone, and Z. Najmudin, A metre-scale plasma discharge for plasma wakefield acceleration, Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion68, 045046 (2026)

    work page 2026

  37. [37]

    N. E. Torrado, N. C. Lopes, J. F. A. Silva, C. Amoedo, and A. Sublet, Double pulse generator for unipolar discharges in long plasma tubes for the awake experiment, IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci.51, 3619 (2023)

    work page 2023

  38. [38]

    N. E. Torrado, C. Amoedo, A. Sublet, M. Taborelli, S. F. Pinto, J. F. Silva, and N. Lopes, Double pulse generator for awake scalable discharge plasma source, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.3124, 012021 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Turner, E

    M. Turner, E. Walter, C. Amoedo, N. E. Torrado, N. C. Lopes, A. Sublet,et al., Experimental obser- vation of the motion of ions in a resonantly driven plasma wakefield accelerator, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 155001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Vieira, R

    J. Vieira, R. A. Fonseca, W. Mori, and L. O. Silva, Ion motion in self-modulated plasma wakefield accelerators, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 145005 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Nosochkovet al., Dynamic aperture of the EIC electron storage ring, JACoWIPAC2024, MOPC82 (2024)

    Y. Nosochkovet al., Dynamic aperture of the EIC electron storage ring, JACoWIPAC2024, MOPC82 (2024)

    work page 2024