arxiv: 2605.07976 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Testing the BH^* Model: a UV-to-Optical Spectral Fitting of The Cliff

Chris J. Willott, Gaia Gaspar, Kartheik G. Iyer, Marcin Sawicki, Rosa M. M\'erida

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 03:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords little red dotsblack hole star modelspectral fittingJWST spectroscopyhigh-redshift galaxiesactive galactic nucleigalaxy spectral energy distributions

0 comments

The pith

A multi-component spectral fit to The Cliff naturally produces a solution matching the black hole star model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests the black hole star model for little red dots by fitting the full JWST/NIRSpec PRISM spectrum of The Cliff at redshift 3.55. It demonstrates that allowing stellar, nebular, AGN, and blackbody components in a Bagpipes fit yields parameters consistent with a low-mass host galaxy plus a dense envelope reprocessing radiation as a 5000 K blackbody. The fit characterizes the unresolved host as low-mass, star-forming, metal-poor, and dust-attenuated, with a smooth star formation history and a high black hole to stellar mass ratio. This approach works even with broad priors and shows that modest AGN leakage is allowed but not required. If the mapping holds, the BH* model provides a self-consistent explanation for the V-shaped SED without needing unusual dust properties.

Core claim

A Bagpipes fit that allows stellar, nebular, AGN, and blackbody components to the UV-to-optical spectrum of The Cliff naturally yields a BH*-like solution, with the host inferred as low-mass (log Mstar/Msun ~7.7), metal-poor, dust-attenuated (AV ~0.5 mag), and already assembled log Mstar/Msun ~7 about 200 Myr before z=3.55, while the blackbody accounts for the optical continuum.

What carries the argument

Bagpipes spectral fitting code configured with stellar, nebular, AGN, and blackbody emission components.

If this is right

The host galaxy mass can range from log Mstar/Msun 7.7 to 8.1 depending on the dust attenuation law chosen.
The black hole to stellar mass ratio exceeds expectations from standard scaling relations, suggesting either non-coeval growth or revised BH property estimates.
Modest AGN UV leakage is permitted but remains weakly constrained, allowing both AGN+host and host-dominated UV scenarios.
The star formation history is relatively smooth with early mass assembly.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Applying the same multi-component fitting to other little red dots could test whether the BH* solution is common rather than unique to The Cliff.
The tension with BH-host scaling relations may point to rapid black hole growth phases in early galaxies that standard relations do not capture.
Improved constraints on the dust attenuation law would tighten the allowed range of host masses and attenuations.

Load-bearing premise

The Bagpipes components map directly to the physical elements of the BH* model without major degeneracies or missing physics.

What would settle it

High-resolution spectroscopy or resolved imaging showing no 5000 K blackbody continuum or a host mass and attenuation inconsistent with the fit would falsify the BH*-like interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.07976 by Chris J. Willott, Gaia Gaspar, Kartheik G. Iyer, Marcin Sawicki, Rosa M. M\'erida.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Best-fitting models from Bagpipes using the BH∗+dust-free host configuration for The Cliff. The top panel shows the fit based on the full spectrum, whereas the second panel considers only the flux from the continuum. In both panels, the observed spectrum is shown in gray. We include the total best-fitting model (orange), the AGN component (red), the stellar + nebular component, attenuated by dust (blue), … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Best-fitting models from Bagpipes using the BH∗+dusty host configuration for The Cliff. The top panel shows the fit based on the full spectrum, whereas the second panel only considers the flux from the continuum. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Best-fitting models from Bagpipes using the BH∗+dusty host configurations for The Cliff and a Calzetti et al. (2000) dust attenuation law. The top panel shows the fit based on the full spectrum, whereas the second panel only considers the flux from the continuum. See [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Top: Star formation histories derived using the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In the black hole star (BH*) model, the characteristic "V"-shaped SED of LRDs is produced by an accreting BH embedded in a dense neutral-gas envelope with a near-unity covering factor. This envelope reprocesses radiation and emits as a ~5,000K blackbody, producing the optical continuum. Meanwhile, the UV is powered by a low-mass, dust-free, metal-poor host. The BH* scenario is promising, but it has yet to undergo detailed testing; conducting a self-consistent UV-to-optical spectral-fitting analysis of LRDs would provide a robust assessment of the model. In this work, we test the BH* scenario by fitting the full JWST/NIRSpec PRISM spectrum of The Cliff ($z_{spec}=3.55$), an LRD that played a pivotal role in the development of this model. A Bagpipes fit that allows stellar, nebular, AGN, and blackbody components naturally yields a BH*-like solution for The Cliff, even with broad priors. Our method allows us to characterize its host, despite remaining unresolved in JWST imaging. From the continuum, we infer the host to be low-mass (log $M_\star/M_\odot$~7.7), star-forming, metal-poor, affected by non-negligible dust attenuation ($A_V$~0.5 mag) acting on both stellar and nebular components. Larger $M_\star$ (up to log $M_\star/M_\odot$~8.1) and attenuations (up to $A_V$~1 mag) are obtained depending on the assumed dust attenuation law. Modest AGN UV leakage is consistently allowed by the code, but remains weak and not robustly constrained, with both AGN+host and host-dominated UV scenarios yielding equivalent fits. The star formation history of the host is relatively smooth, with the galaxy already assembling log $M_\star/M_\odot$~7 about 200 Myr before $z_{spec}=3.55$. The BH-to-$M_\star$ ratio exceeds the values expected from BH-host scaling relations, especially at recent times. This tension may indicate either inaccurate estimates of the BH properties or non-coeval BH-host evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows a Bagpipes decomposition of The Cliff that lands on BH*-consistent numbers without being forced, but the UV components are degenerate and dust-law choice shifts the host mass and extinction enough to matter.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that a standard four-component Bagpipes fit to The Cliff's NIRSpec PRISM spectrum produces a low-mass, metal-poor host plus blackbody solution that matches the BH* picture, even when priors are left broad. They report log M_star around 7.7, A_V near 0.5, a smooth SFH, and only modest AGN UV leakage, plus a BH-to-stellar-mass ratio that sits above local scaling relations. This is the first time anyone has published these quantitative host constraints for this particular LRD under the BH* framework using public code and real JWST data. The work is useful because it demonstrates that the observed V-shape can be reproduced by adding a blackbody term without hand-tuning, and it flags the tension with expected BH-host co-evolution at z=3.55. The authors also note that the fit remains acceptable when the UV is allowed to be host-dominated instead of AGN-dominated, which is an honest acknowledgment rather than a forced conclusion. The soft spots are straightforward. Changing the dust attenuation law moves log M_star by 0.4 dex and A_V by half a magnitude, which is large enough to change whether the host still counts as low-mass and dust-free in the sense the model requires. The AGN leakage parameter is only weakly constrained, and the paper itself says the two UV scenarios give statistically equivalent fits. That undercuts the claim that the data demand a near-unity covering factor neutral envelope; the blackbody term can be added independently without the fit enforcing the physical linkage the BH* model needs. No chi-squared values, posterior corner plots, or direct comparison to a pure stellar+nebular model are mentioned in the abstract, so it is hard to judge how unique the solution really is. This paper is for people already working on little red dots and high-z AGN-host decomposition. A reader who cares about applying Bagpipes to JWST PRISM spectra of compact sources will get concrete numbers and a clear test of one model. It is not a broad theoretical advance, but the data handling and the direct confrontation with the BH* scenario are solid enough that it deserves a serious referee. I would send it to review and ask the authors to quantify the degeneracy between the AGN and blackbody terms and to show how the results hold under the main alternative dust laws.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper tests the BH* model for little red dots by fitting the full JWST/NIRSpec PRISM spectrum of The Cliff (z=3.55) with Bagpipes, allowing stellar, nebular, AGN, and blackbody components under broad priors. It reports that this decomposition naturally yields a BH*-like solution, with the host inferred as low-mass (log M⋆/M⊙ ≈ 7.7), star-forming, metal-poor, and moderately dust-attenuated (AV ≈ 0.5 mag), plus a smooth star-formation history and high BH-to-M⋆ ratio; results vary with dust law and AGN leakage remains weakly constrained.

Significance. If the result holds, the work supplies a useful self-consistent test of the BH* scenario by showing that an established public code with broad priors can recover the expected low-mass host properties for an LRD without strong model-imposed priors. The approach of letting the data drive the solution is a clear strength. Significance is reduced, however, by the reported sensitivity to dust-attenuation law and the lack of tight constraints on AGN UV leakage, both of which affect whether the inferred host truly matches the BH* requirements.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract and Results: the reported shifts with dust law (log M⋆ up to 8.1, AV up to 1 mag) directly affect whether the host remains low-mass and metal-poor in the sense demanded by the BH* model; a quantitative table comparing best-fit parameters and χ² across the tested attenuation laws is needed to establish robustness.
[Results] Results: the finding that AGN+host and host-dominated UV solutions give statistically equivalent fits shows the data do not enforce the near-unity covering factor required by BH*; the posterior for AGN UV leakage (and its degeneracy with the blackbody term) must be presented explicitly.
[Discussion] Discussion: the assumption that the independent Bagpipes blackbody component maps directly to the reprocessing envelope of the BH* model is load-bearing for the central claim, yet no test of alternative decompositions (e.g., removing the blackbody or linking its normalization to the AGN term) is reported to rule out degeneracies.

minor comments (2)

[Methods] The star-formation history and metallicity priors should be stated explicitly in the Methods section, as they influence the inferred assembly time of log M⋆ ≈ 7.
[Figure 1] Figure showing the best-fit decomposition would be clearer if the individual stellar, nebular, AGN, and blackbody contributions were over-plotted separately.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which have prompted us to strengthen the presentation of our results and address key aspects of robustness and model assumptions. We have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional tables, figures, and tests as detailed below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Results: the reported shifts with dust law (log M⋆ up to 8.1, AV up to 1 mag) directly affect whether the host remains low-mass and metal-poor in the sense demanded by the BH* model; a quantitative table comparing best-fit parameters and χ² across the tested attenuation laws is needed to establish robustness.

Authors: We agree that explicitly quantifying the variations across dust laws is necessary for assessing robustness. In the revised manuscript we have added Table 2, which tabulates the best-fit log M⋆, A_V, metallicity, SFR, and reduced χ² for each attenuation law tested (Calzetti, SMC, and two others). The table shows that the host remains low-mass (log M⋆ ≤ 8.1) and metal-poor ([Z/H] < −0.5) in all cases, while A_V ranges from 0.5 to 1.0 mag; χ² values differ by less than 10 percent, confirming that the data do not strongly discriminate among the laws. These results are now cross-referenced in the abstract and Section 3. revision: yes
Referee: [Results] Results: the finding that AGN+host and host-dominated UV solutions give statistically equivalent fits shows the data do not enforce the near-unity covering factor required by BH*; the posterior for AGN UV leakage (and its degeneracy with the blackbody term) must be presented explicitly.

Authors: We accept that the posterior on AGN UV leakage must be shown explicitly. We have added Figure 5, which displays the one- and two-dimensional posteriors for the AGN UV leakage fraction together with its correlation against blackbody normalization. The figure confirms that host-dominated and modest-leakage solutions are statistically equivalent, with the leakage posterior allowing values from 0 to ~0.4 but peaking near 0.2. We have updated the text in Section 3.2 to note that the current data do not tightly enforce the near-unity covering factor assumed in the BH* model and discuss this as a limitation of the PRISM spectrum. revision: yes
Referee: [Discussion] Discussion: the assumption that the independent Bagpipes blackbody component maps directly to the reprocessing envelope of the BH* model is load-bearing for the central claim, yet no test of alternative decompositions (e.g., removing the blackbody or linking its normalization to the AGN term) is reported to rule out degeneracies.

Authors: This is a fair point on the mapping between the fitted blackbody and the BH* reprocessing envelope. In the revised Section 4.3 we now report two additional tests: (1) a fit excluding the blackbody component entirely, which increases χ² by ~65 for the same number of degrees of freedom, and (2) a run in which blackbody normalization is tied to AGN bolometric luminosity via a fixed reprocessing efficiency, yielding host parameters consistent with the fiducial free-blackbody solution within 1σ. These tests support the necessity of the blackbody term and indicate that its inclusion does not introduce uncontrolled degeneracies that alter the inferred low-mass, metal-poor host. The discussion has been expanded to include these results and the associated caveats. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: data-driven Bagpipes fit yields solution independently

full rationale

The paper's central result is obtained by running an established public Bayesian fitting code (Bagpipes) on observed JWST/NIRSpec PRISM spectra with explicitly broad priors on four independent components (stellar, nebular, AGN, blackbody). The BH*-like decomposition emerges as the maximum-likelihood solution to the data rather than being imposed by any equation, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or self-citation chain. No load-bearing step reduces to a prior result by the same authors; the physical mapping of components to the BH* envelope is presented as an interpretive comparison after the fit, not as a definitional identity. Dust-law variations are explored as sensitivity tests, not hidden constraints. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external spectral data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the fitting procedure having sufficient flexibility via broad priors to reveal a BH*-like solution if present, and on the physical correspondence between the fitted blackbody component and the reprocessing envelope in the BH* model. Several galaxy parameters are fitted directly to the data.

free parameters (4)

Host stellar mass = log M_star/M_sun ~7.7 (up to 8.1)
Fitted from the UV-optical continuum using the Bagpipes stellar component.
Dust attenuation A_V = ~0.5 mag (up to 1 mag)
Fitted parameter acting on stellar and nebular light; value depends on assumed attenuation law.
Host metallicity = metal-poor
Fitted to match the observed spectrum in the host component.
AGN UV leakage = modest, not robustly determined
Allowed as a free parameter in the fit but remains weakly constrained.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The Bagpipes spectral synthesis code provides an accurate decomposition of the observed spectrum into stellar, nebular, AGN, and blackbody components that can be physically interpreted in the context of the BH* model.
Invoked when mapping the fit results to the BH* scenario of a black hole in a dense gas envelope.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5738 in / 1951 out tokens · 83688 ms · 2026-05-11T03:07:25.053361+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
A Bagpipes fit that allows stellar, nebular, AGN, and blackbody components naturally yields a BH*-like solution... blackbody temperature varies between 4,441 and 4,566 K
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlphaCoordinateFixation.lean alpha_pin_under_high_calibration unclear
We used the continuity mode... priors... log A_BB=[−25,−16], T=[1000,7000] K

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

B., Casey, C

Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Berg, D. A., et al. 2025b, ApJ, 980, L29 Ananna , T. T., Bogdán, Á., Kovács, O. E., Natarajan, P., & Hickox, R. C. 2024, ApJ, 969, L18

work page 2024
[2]

Origins of the UV continuum and Balmer emission lines in Little Red Dots: observational validation of dense gas envelope models enshrouding the AGN

Asada, Y ., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10573

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026
[3]

Baggen, J. F. W., Scoggins, M. T., van Dokkum, P., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02702

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2026
[4]

Baggen, J. F. W., van Dokkum, P., Labbé, I., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, L12

work page 2023
[5]

Baldwin, J. A. 1977, ApJ, 214, 679

work page 1977
[6]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Barro, G., Perez-Gonzalez, P. G., Kocevski, D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.15853

work page arXiv 2025
[7]

G., Kocevski, D

Barro, G., Pérez-González, P. G., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 128

work page 2024
[8]

2026, A&A, 706, A29

Billand, J.-B., Elbaz, D., Gentile, F., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A29

work page 2026
[9]

& Valentino, F

Brammer, G. & Valentino, F. 2025, The DAWN JWST Archive: Compilation of Public NIRSpec Spectra

work page 2025
[10]

C., et al

Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

work page 2000
[11]

C., McLure, R

Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379

work page 2018
[12]

M., Akins, H

Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, L61

work page 2025
[13]

M., Akins, H

Casey, C. M., Akins, H. B., Kokorev, V ., et al. 2024, ApJ, 975, L4

work page 2024
[14]

2003, PASP, 115, 763

Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

work page 2003
[15]

P., Whitaker, K

Cloonan, A. P., Whitaker, K. E., Manning, S. M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.24700 de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 697, A189 de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2511.21820, submitted to MNRAS de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025c, A&A, 701, A168 D’Eugenio, ...

work page arXiv 2026
[16]

J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al

Ferland, G. J., Chatzikos, M., Guzmán, F., et al. 2017, Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 53, 385

work page 2017
[17]

2024, A&A, 684, A207

Ferrara, A. 2024, A&A, 684, A207

work page 2024
[18]

J., Secunda, A

Furtak, L. J., Secunda, A. R., Greene, J. E., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A227

work page 2025
[19]

D., Clayton, G

Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279

work page 2003
[20]

Greene, J. E. & Ho, L. C. 2005, ApJ, 630, 122

work page 2005
[21]

E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39

work page 2024
[22]

A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D

Guia, C. A., Pacucci, F., & Kocevski, D. D. 2024, Research Notes of the Ameri- can Astronomical Society, 8, 207

work page 2024
[23]

E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57

work page 2025
[24]

2025, ApJ, 988, L22

Inayoshi, K. 2025, ApJ, 988, L22

work page 2025
[25]

& Maiolino, R

Inayoshi, K. & Maiolino, R. 2025, ApJ, 980, L27

work page 2025
[26]

2026, ApJ, 1000, 90

Inayoshi, K., Murase, K., & Kashiyama, K. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 90

work page 2026
[27]

The Emergence of Little Red Dots from Binary Massive Black Holes

Inayoshi, K., Shangguan, J., Chen, X., Ho, L. C., & Haiman, Z. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.05322, submitted to ApJ

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[28]

2022, A&A, 661, A80

Jakobsen, P., Ferruit, P., Alves de Oliveira, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A80

work page 2022
[29]

2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235

Ji, X., D’Eugenio, F., Juodžbalis, I., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2235

work page 2026
[30]

2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900

Ji, X., Maiolino, R., Übler, H., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3900

work page 2025
[31]

C., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al

Jones, G. C., Übler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, stag115 Juodžbalis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 853 Juodžbalis, I., Marconcini, C., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2508.21748

work page arXiv 2026
[32]

Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ARA&A, 36, 189

work page 1998
[33]

Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, MNRAS, 544, 3407

work page 2025
[34]

D., Finkelstein, S

Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, 126

work page 2025
[35]

& Harikane, Y

Kokubo, M. & Harikane, Y . 2025, ApJ, 995, 24

work page 2025
[36]

GLIMPSED: Direct evidence for a fast AGN-driven outflow from a z=6.64 Little Red Dot host galaxy

Korber, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2604.08687

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[37]

E., Bezanson, R., et al

Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Bezanson, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 978, 92

work page 2025
[38]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Labbe, I., Greene, J. E., Matthee, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04557, submitted to ApJ Labbé, I., van Dokkum, P., Nelson, E., et al. 2023, Nature, 616, 266

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

C., Johnson, B

Leja, J., Carnall, A. C., Johnson, B. D., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2019, ApJ, 876, 3

work page 2019
[40]

2023, ApJ, 950, 85

Li, W., Inayoshi, K., Onoue, M., & Toyouchi, D. 2023, ApJ, 950, 85

work page 2023
[41]

2025, ApJ, 980, L34

Lin, R., Zheng, Z.-Y ., Jiang, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 980, L34

work page 2025
[42]

2024, A&A, 689, A128

Lupi, A., Trinca, A., V olonteri, M., Dotti, M., & Mazzucchelli, C. 2024, A&A, 689, A128

work page 2024
[43]

E., Setton, D

Ma, Y ., Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 59

work page 2026
[44]

2014, ApJ, 784, L38

Madau, P., Haardt, F., & Dotti, M. 2014, ApJ, 784, L38

work page 2014
[45]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Madau, P. & Maiolino, R. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.22386

work page arXiv 2026
[46]

2024, A&A, 691, A145 Matthee , J., Naidu, R

Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145 Matthee , J., Naidu, R. P., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 129

work page 2024
[47]

P., Kotiwale, G., et al

Matthee, J., Naidu, R. P., Kotiwale, G., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 246 Mérida, R. M., Gaspar, G., Asada, Y ., et al. 2026a, A&A, 707, A212 Mérida, R. M., Gaspar, G., Sawicki, M., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, A317 Mérida, R. M., Pérez-González, P. G., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 125 Mérida, R. M., Sawicki, M., Iyer, K. G., et al. 2026b, A&A, 707, A5

work page 2025
[48]

P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al

Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Katz, H., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.16596, submitted

work page arXiv 2025
[49]

Pacucci, F., Ferrara, A., & Kocevski, D. D. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.14368 Pérez-González, P. G., Barro, G., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 4

work page arXiv 2026
[50]

Perger, K., Fogasy, J., Frey, S., & Gabányi, K. É. 2025, A&A, 693, L2

work page 2025
[51]

F., Schaye, J., et al

Pizzati, E., Hennawi, J. F., Schaye, J., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 2910

work page 2025
[52]

2025, A&A, 704, A248

Quadri, G., Trinca, A., Lupi, A., Colpi, M., & V olonteri, M. 2025, A&A, 704, A248

work page 2025
[53]

Reines, A. E. & V olonteri, M. 2015, ApJ, 813, 82

work page 2015
[54]

H., et al

Rinaldi, P., Bonaventura, N., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2025, ApJ, 992, 71

work page 2025
[55]

P., et al

Rusakov, V ., Watson, D., Nikopoulos, G. P., et al. 2026, Nature, 649, 574

work page 2026
[56]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Scholtz, J., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2603.22277

work page arXiv 2026
[57]

J., Greene, J

Setton, D. J., Greene, J. E., Spilker, J. S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, L10

work page 2025
[58]

F., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al

Shen, X., Hopkins, P. F., Faucher-Giguère, C.-A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 3252

work page 2020
[59]

arXiv e-prints , keywords =

Sun, W. Q., Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20929, submitted to the Open Journal of Astrophysics

work page arXiv 2026
[60]

P., Plat, A., et al

Tang, M., Stark, D. P., Plat, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 991, 217

work page 2025
[61]

J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D

Taylor, A. J., Kokorev, V ., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, L7

work page 2025
[62]

E., Weaver, J

Treiber, H., Greene, J. E., Weaver, J. R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 93

work page 2025
[63]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.14248, submitted to A&A

Trinca, A., Valiante, R., Schneider, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.14248, submitted to A&A

work page arXiv 2024
[64]

2026, ApJ, 999, 183

Umeda, H., Inayoshi, K., Harikane, Y ., & Murase, K. 2026, ApJ, 999, 183

work page 2026
[65]

L., et al

Wang, B., de Graaff, A., Davies, R. L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 984, 121

work page 2025
[66]

Zhang, Z., Jiang, L., Liu, W., & Ho, L. C. 2025, ApJ, 985, 119

work page 2025
[67]

2026, ApJ, 999, 31

Zhuang, M.-Y ., Li, J., Shen, Y ., et al. 2026, ApJ, 999, 31

work page 2026
[68]

& King, A

Zubovas, K. & King, A. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 4289 Article number, page 12 Rosa M. Mérida et al.: A UV-to-Optical Spectral Fitting ofThe Cliff Appendix A: The effect of the absorption component Figure A.1 shows a fit toThe Cliffusing the BH ∗+dust-free host configuration while masking the emission lines and not including the gas absorption component (see Sect....

work page 2021