arxiv: 2605.08065 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 🧮 math-ph · hep-th· math.MP· nlin.SI

Recognition: no theorem link

Hamiltonian formulation of the supersymmetric KdV equation

Ali Pazarci , Nadir Ghazanfari , Ilmar Gahramanov

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math-ph hep-thmath.MPnlin.SI

keywords supersymmetric KdVHamiltonian formulationDirac-Bergmann algorithmconstrained systemsnonlocal Hamiltonian densitysuperspace formulationdegenerate Lagrangian

0 comments

The pith

The supersymmetric KdV equation with a=2 admits a constrained Hamiltonian formulation that includes a nonlocal density term.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a Hamiltonian description for one supersymmetric extension of the Korteweg-de Vries equation by fixing the free parameter a at the value 2. This choice produces a degenerate Lagrangian, so the authors apply the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm to extract the complete set of primary and secondary constraints. The procedure generates a total Hamiltonian whose density contains a nonlocal contribution tied to the fermionic fields. The resulting Hamilton equations recover the original supersymmetric KdV system in components, and the authors also write an equivalent compact Hamiltonian directly in superspace that matches the component version.

Core claim

The supersymmetric KdV equation obtained by setting a=2 in the supersymmetric extension is a constrained system. Its Lagrangian is degenerate, so the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm determines the full set of constraints and yields a total Hamiltonian that includes a nonlocal term in the density. The Hamilton equations derived from this total Hamiltonian reproduce the supersymmetric KdV system in component form. A compact superspace representation of the Hamiltonian is constructed and shown to be consistent with the component-level formulation.

What carries the argument

The Dirac-Bergmann algorithm applied to the degenerate Lagrangian of the a=2 supersymmetric KdV extension, which identifies primary and secondary constraints and produces a total Hamiltonian containing a nonlocal density contribution.

If this is right

The supersymmetric KdV system behaves as a constrained Hamiltonian system analogous to the ordinary KdV equation.
A consistent superspace Hamiltonian exists that reproduces the component dynamics without additional corrections.
The nonlocal contribution to the Hamiltonian density is required for consistency when a=2 is chosen.
The formulation supplies a total Hamiltonian that can be used to generate the time evolution of all fields.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same Dirac-Bergmann treatment could be applied to other supersymmetric extensions of integrable equations that also become degenerate at special parameter values.
The presence of the nonlocal term may influence the definition of Poisson brackets or the passage to a quantum theory.
Direct comparison of the superspace and component Hamiltonians confirms that the supersymmetry is preserved at the Hamiltonian level.

Load-bearing premise

The choice of the specific value a=2 in the supersymmetric extension, which forces the Lagrangian to be degenerate and thereby requires the Dirac-Bergmann procedure together with a nonlocal term.

What would settle it

An explicit calculation showing that the Hamilton equations obtained from the total Hamiltonian do not reproduce one or more of the component equations of the supersymmetric KdV system.

read the original abstract

We studied the constrained Hamiltonian formulation of a supersymmetric Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation, which is observed to be a constrained system similar to its classical version. We found a nontrivial Lagrangian description, where we select $a=2$ for the free parameter $a$ in the supersymmetric extension. The corresponding degenerate Lagrangian requires an exclusive consideration and the utilization of the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm. We explicitly determined the full set of primary and secondary constraints and constructed the total Hamiltonian governing the dynamics of the system. In this analysis, in addition to a nontrivial constraint involving the fermionic fields, the consistency conditions give rise to a nonlocal contribution to the Hamiltonian density. This highlights a distinctive feature of this supersymmetric extension. We showed that the resulting Hamilton equations of motion reproduce the supersymmetric KdV system in the component form. Finally, we derived a compact superspace representation of the Hamiltonian and demonstrated its consistency with the component-level formulation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper runs the Dirac-Bergmann procedure on the supersymmetric KdV at a=2 and gets a nonlocal Hamiltonian density that still reproduces the original equations in components and superspace.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that they pick the parameter a=2 in the supersymmetric extension, which makes the Lagrangian degenerate, then apply the full Dirac-Bergmann algorithm to find primary and secondary constraints. This produces a total Hamiltonian that includes a nonlocal term generated by the consistency condition on the fermionic constraint. They check that the Hamilton equations recover the supersymmetric KdV componentwise and also give a compact superspace form of the Hamiltonian that matches the component version. That explicit constraint analysis and the superspace compactification are the parts that actually add something concrete. People who work on Hamiltonian structures for supersymmetric integrable systems can use the nonlocal term and the superspace expression directly for further calculations like quantization or symmetry analysis. The reproduction step is the key verification, and if the functional derivatives and brackets are handled without hidden boundary-term issues, the claim goes through. The nonlocality does introduce the usual care needed with integration by parts, but the paper states they verified the match, so the central equivalence holds on the evidence given. The choice of a=2 is upfront and necessary for the degeneracy, though it does restrict the result to this specific case rather than the general family. This is aimed at specialists who need the Hamiltonian formulation for supersymmetric KdV or similar constrained supersymmetric PDEs. A reader who wants the technical steps for constrained systems or superspace representations will get usable details. It is technically grounded enough to deserve a serious referee, even though the advance is incremental.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a constrained Hamiltonian formulation for a supersymmetric extension of the KdV equation at parameter value a=2. Using the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm on the resulting degenerate Lagrangian, it determines the full set of primary and secondary constraints, constructs the total Hamiltonian (including a nonlocal term generated by consistency conditions), verifies that the Hamilton equations reproduce the supersymmetric KdV system in component form, and derives a compact superspace representation of the Hamiltonian shown to be consistent with the component-level version.

Significance. If the reproduction of the dynamics holds rigorously, the work supplies an explicit constrained Hamiltonian structure for a supersymmetric integrable PDE, with the appearance of a nonlocal density as a distinctive feature of this extension. This could support further investigations into quantization, conserved quantities, or integrability properties of supersymmetric systems. The paper employs standard algorithmic methods to derive the constraints and Hamiltonian rather than inserting them by hand, which is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)

[§4] §4 (consistency conditions and total Hamiltonian): the nonlocal contribution to the Hamiltonian density is obtained from the secondary constraint consistency condition, yet the subsequent derivation of the Hamilton equations via functional derivatives does not explicitly address potential boundary terms arising from integration by parts on the nonlocal integral; without this, it remains unclear whether the equations match the component sKdV system term-by-term on the constrained surface.
[§5] §5 (superspace representation): the compact superspace Hamiltonian is presented and stated to be consistent with the component formulation, but the verification consists only of a high-level comparison; an explicit computation showing that the superspace Poisson bracket or functional derivatives recover the same component equations (including the nonlocal term) is needed to confirm equivalence.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] The motivation for selecting a=2 (which produces the degeneracy) is stated but could be expanded with a short comparison to other values of a to clarify why this choice is the nontrivial case requiring the Dirac-Bergmann procedure.
Notation for the superfield components and the precise definition of the Poisson structure on the constrained surface should be summarized in a dedicated subsection or table for easier reference when reading the Hamilton equations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the paper to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§4] §4 (consistency conditions and total Hamiltonian): the nonlocal contribution to the Hamiltonian density is obtained from the secondary constraint consistency condition, yet the subsequent derivation of the Hamilton equations via functional derivatives does not explicitly address potential boundary terms arising from integration by parts on the nonlocal integral; without this, it remains unclear whether the equations match the component sKdV system term-by-term on the constrained surface.

Authors: We appreciate the referee's observation. The derivation in §4 relies on standard assumptions for field theories on the line, where fields and their derivatives decay sufficiently rapidly at spatial infinity so that all boundary terms from integration by parts vanish. To address the concern directly, we will add an explicit paragraph in the revised §4 that performs the integration by parts step by step for the nonlocal term and confirms that the resulting Hamilton equations reproduce the component sKdV system term-by-term on the constrained surface. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5 (superspace representation): the compact superspace Hamiltonian is presented and stated to be consistent with the component formulation, but the verification consists only of a high-level comparison; an explicit computation showing that the superspace Poisson bracket or functional derivatives recover the same component equations (including the nonlocal term) is needed to confirm equivalence.

Authors: We agree that a more detailed verification would improve clarity. In the revised manuscript we will expand §5 to include the explicit computation of the functional derivatives (or Poisson brackets) of the superspace Hamiltonian, showing term by term that they recover the component equations, including the nonlocal contribution arising from the fermionic consistency condition. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation follows standard constrained Hamiltonian procedure

full rationale

The paper begins with the known supersymmetric KdV system, selects the explicit parameter value a=2 to obtain a degenerate Lagrangian, applies the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm to identify the full set of primary and secondary constraints, and derives the total Hamiltonian (including the nonlocal density generated by consistency conditions). It then computes the resulting Hamilton equations and verifies term-by-term reproduction of the original component equations. This verification is an independent consistency check of the algorithm rather than a reduction by construction; the nonlocal term arises mechanically from the procedure and is not presupposed. No load-bearing step relies on self-citation chains, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatzes smuggled from prior work. The superspace Hamiltonian is likewise obtained by direct rewriting and shown consistent with the component form. The derivation remains self-contained within the standard framework of constrained dynamics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard application of the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm to a degenerate Lagrangian chosen at a specific value of the supersymmetric extension parameter; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)

a
Free parameter in the supersymmetric extension of the KdV Lagrangian; set to 2 to obtain a nontrivial degenerate case requiring constrained dynamics.

axioms (1)

standard math Dirac-Bergmann algorithm applies to degenerate Lagrangians and generates the full set of primary and secondary constraints plus the total Hamiltonian.
Invoked to handle the constrained system and derive consistency conditions that produce the nonlocal term.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5472 in / 1335 out tokens · 48418 ms · 2026-05-11T02:03:16.727470+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

V. E. Zakharov and L. D. Faddeev, Korteweg-de vries equation: A completely integrable hamiltonian system, Functional Analysis and Its Applications5, 280 (1971)

work page 1971
[2]

Flaschka, A

H. Flaschka, A. C. Newell, and M. Tabor, Integrability, inWhat Is Integrability?, edited by V. E. Zakharov (Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991) pp. 73–114

work page 1991
[3]

A. C. Newell, Theτ-function, the hirota method, the painlev´ e property and b¨ acklund transformations for the ko- rteweg—devries family of soliton equations, inSolitons in Mathematics and Physics(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1985) Chap. 4, pp. 113–144

work page 1985
[4]

Hohloch and F

S. Hohloch and F. Zadra, Selected aspects of the korteweg-de vries equation (2024), arXiv:2411.18504 [nlin.SI]

work page arXiv 2024
[5]

N. J. Zabusky and M. D. Kruskal, Interaction of ”solitons” in a collisionless plasma and the recurrence of initial states, Phys. Rev. Lett.15, 240 (1965)

work page 1965
[6]

B. A. Dubrovin and S. P. Novikov, A periodicity problem for the korteweg–de vries and sturm–liouville equations. their connection with algebraic geometry, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR219, 531 (1974)

work page 1974
[7]

G. B. Whitham, Applications of the nonlinear theory, inLinear and Nonlinear Waves(John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 1999) Chap. 16, pp. 533–576

work page 1999
[8]

Huang, Nonlinear amplitude equations and soliton excitations in bose-einstein condensates, inNonlinear Waves in Fluids: Recent Advances and Modern Applications, edited by R

G. Huang, Nonlinear amplitude equations and soliton excitations in bose-einstein condensates, inNonlinear Waves in Fluids: Recent Advances and Modern Applications, edited by R. Grimshaw (Springer Vienna, Vienna, 2005) pp. 169–196

work page 2005
[9]

R. Y. Donagi, Geometry and integrability, inGeometry and Integrability, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, edited by L. Mason and Y. Nutku (Cambridge University Press, 2003) p. 21–59

work page 2003
[10]

Schalch, The korteweg-de vries equation, Proseminar: Algebra, Topology and Group Theory in Physics (2018)

N. Schalch, The korteweg-de vries equation, Proseminar: Algebra, Topology and Group Theory in Physics (2018)

work page 2018
[11]

P. D. Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathe- matics21, 467 (1968)

work page 1968
[12]

V. A. Marchenko, The periodic korteweg–de vries problem, Math. USSR-Sb.24, 319 (1974)

work page 1974
[13]

B. A. Dubrovin and S. P. Novikov, Periodic and conditionally periodic analogs of the many-soliton solutions of the korteweg- de vries equation, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.67, 2131 (1974)

work page 1974
[14]

L. A. Dickey,Soliton Equations and Hamiltonian Systems, 2nd ed. (World Scientific, 2003)

work page 2003
[15]

W. X. Ma, N-soliton solutions and the hirota conditions in (1 + 1)-dimensions, International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation23, 123 (2022)

work page 2022
[16]

H. Ma, X. Qi, and A. Deng, Exact soliton solutions to the variable-coefficient korteweg–de vries system with cubic–quintic nonlinearity, Mathematics12, 10.3390/math12223628 (2024)

work page doi:10.3390/math12223628 2024
[17]

Kodama and M

Y. Kodama and M. Wadati, Theory of canonical transformations for nonlinear evolution equations. i, Progress of Theoretical Physics56, 1740 (1976)

work page 1976
[18]

Nutku, On a new class of completely integrable nonlinear wave equations

Y. Nutku, On a new class of completely integrable nonlinear wave equations. i. infinitely many conservation laws, Journal of Mathematical Physics26, 1237 (1985)

work page 1985
[19]

Antonowicz and A

M. Antonowicz and A. P. Fordy, A family of completely integrable multi-hamiltonian systems, Physics Letters A122, 95 (1987)

work page 1987
[20]

Nutku, On a new class of completely integrable nonlinear wave equations

Y. Nutku, On a new class of completely integrable nonlinear wave equations. ii. multi-hamiltonian structure, Journal of Mathematical Physics28, 2579 (1987)

work page 1987
[21]

Nutku and O

Y. Nutku and O. Oguz, Bi-hamiltonian structure of a pair of coupled kdv equations, Il Nuovo Cimento B (1971-1996) 10.1007/BF02742693 (1990)

work page doi:10.1007/bf02742693 1971
[22]

G¨ umral and Y

H. G¨ umral and Y. Nutku, Multi-hamiltonian structure of equations of hydrodynamic type, Journal of Mathematical Physics 31, 2606 (1990)

work page 1990
[23]

Y. Nutku, Lagrangian approach to integrable systems yields new symplectic structures for KdV, inNATO Advanced Research Workshop on Integrable Hierarchies and Modern Physical Theories (NATO ARW - UIC 2000)(2000) arXiv:hep- th/0011052

work page arXiv 2000
[24]

Nutku and M

Y. Nutku and M. Pavlov, Multi-lagrangians for integrable systems, Journal of Mathematical Physics43, 1441 (2002)

work page 2002
[25]

Kever and G

H. Kever and G. K. Morikawa, Korteweg-de vries equation for nonlinear hydromagnetic waves in a warm collision-free plasma, The Physics of Fluids12, 2090 (1969)

work page 2090
[26]

N. J. Zabusky and C. J. Galvin, Shallow-water waves, the korteweg-devries equation and solitons, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics47, 811–824 (1971)

work page 1971
[27]

Lannes,The Water Waves Problem: Mathematical Analysis and Asymptotics, Vol

D. Lannes,The Water Waves Problem: Mathematical Analysis and Asymptotics, Vol. 188 (Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, American Mathematical Society, 2013)

work page 2013
[28]

Verheest and W

F. Verheest and W. A. Hereman, The gardner equation and acoustic solitary waves in plasmas, Journal of Plasma Physics 91, E117 (2025)

work page 2025
[29]

C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura, Method for solving the korteweg-devries equation, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1095 (1967)

work page 1967
[30]

V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, A scheme for integrating the nonlinear equations of mathematical physics by the method of the inverse scattering problem. i, Functional Analysis and Its Applications8, 226 (1974). 7

work page 1974
[31]

G¨ urses and Y

M. G¨ urses and Y. Nutku, New nonlinear evolution equations from surface theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics22, 1393 (1981)

work page 1981
[32]

S. M. Grudsky, V. V. Kravchenko, and S. M. Torba, Realization of the inverse scattering transform method for the korteweg–de vries equation, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences46, 9217 (2023)

work page 2023
[33]

On the inverse scattering transform for the KdV equation with summable initial data

A. Rybkin, On the inverse scattering transform for the kdv equation with summable initial data (2026), arXiv:2604.14412 [math-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[34]

M. C. Nucci and P. G. L. Leach, The jacobi last multiplier and its applications in mechanics, Physica Scripta78, 065011 (2008)

work page 2008
[35]

Do and G

T. Do and G. Prince, The inverse problem in the calculus of variations: new developments, Communications in Mathematics 29, 131 (2021)

work page 2021
[36]

Montesinos, D

M. Montesinos, D. Gonzalez, and J. Meza, Combining symmetries and helmholtz’s conditions to construct lagrangians, Advances in Mathematical Physics2026, 9534805 (2026)

work page 2026
[37]

B. A. Kupershmidt, A SUPER KORTEWEG-DE VRIES EQUATION: AN INTEGRABLE SYSTEM, Phys. Lett. A102, 213 (1984)

work page 1984
[38]

Y. I. Manin and A. O. Radul, A Supersymmetric extension of the Kadomtsev-Petviashvili hierarchy, Commun. Math. Phys.98, 65 (1985)

work page 1985
[39]

Delduc, E

F. Delduc, E. Ivanov, and S. Krivonos, N=4 super kdv hierarchy in n=4 and n=2 superspaces, Journal of Mathematical Physics37, 1356 (1996)

work page 1996
[40]

Bonora and S

L. Bonora and S. Krivonos, Hamiltonian structure and coset construction of the supersymmetric extensions of n=2 kdv hierarchy, Modern Physics Letters A12, 3037 (1997)

work page 1997
[41]

Z. Popowicz, N = 2 supercomplexification of the korteweg-de vries, sawada-kotera and kaup-kupershmidt equations, Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics26, 10.1080/14029251.2019.1591732 (2019)

work page doi:10.1080/14029251.2019.1591732 2019
[42]

Mathieu, Supersymmetric extension of the korteweg–de vries equation, Journal of Mathematical Physics29, 2499 (1988)

P. Mathieu, Supersymmetric extension of the korteweg–de vries equation, Journal of Mathematical Physics29, 2499 (1988)

work page 1988
[43]

Nutku, Canonical formulation of shallow water waves, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General16, 4195 (1983)

Y. Nutku, Canonical formulation of shallow water waves, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General16, 4195 (1983)

work page 1983
[44]

Nutku, Hamiltonian formulation of the kdv equation, Journal of Mathematical Physics25, 2007 (1984)

Y. Nutku, Hamiltonian formulation of the kdv equation, Journal of Mathematical Physics25, 2007 (1984)

work page 2007
[45]

C ¸ a˘ gatay U¸ cgun, O

F. C ¸ a˘ gatay U¸ cgun, O. Esen, and H. G¨ umral, Reductions of topologically massive gravity i: Hamiltonian analysis of second order degenerate lagrangians, Journal of Mathematical Physics59, 013510 (2018)

work page 2018
[46]

H. G¨ umral, Dirac’s analysis and ostrogradskii’s theorem for a class of second-order degenerate lagrangians, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics19, 2250008 (2022)

work page 2022
[47]

Pazarci, U

A. Pazarci, U. C. Turhan, N. Ghazanfari, and I. Gahramanov, Hamiltonian formalism for nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation121, 107191 (2023)

work page 2023
[48]

Das and Z

A. Das and Z. Popowicz, New nonlocal charges in susy-b integrable models, Physics Letters A274, 30 (2000)

work page 2000
[49]

J. C. Brunelli and A. Das, Tests of integrability of the supersymmetric nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation, Journal of Mathe- matical Physics36, 268 (1995)

work page 1995
[50]

M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Integrable nonlocal nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation, Physical review letters110, 064105 (2013)

work page 2013
[51]

M. J. Ablowitz and Z. H. Musslimani, Integrable nonlocal nonlinear equations, Studies in Applied Mathematics139, 7 (2017)

work page 2017
[52]

G¨ urses and A

M. G¨ urses and A. Pekcan, Nonlocal kdv equations, Physics Letters A384, 126894 (2020)

work page 2020
[53]

Doikou, S

A. Doikou, S. J. Malham, and I. Stylianidis, Grassmannian flows and applications to non-commutative non-local and local integrable systems, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena415, 132744 (2021)

work page 2021
[54]

A. D. Polyanin and V. G. Sorokin, Construction of exact solutions to nonlinear pdes with delay using solutions of simpler pdes without delay, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation95, 105634 (2021)

work page 2021
[55]

A. D. Polyanin and N. A. Kudryashov, Nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations with delay: Closed-form and generalized separable solutions, Contemporary Mathematics5, 5783 (2024)

work page 2024
[56]

A. D. Polyanin and N. A. Kudryashov, Exact solutions and reductions of nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations with delay, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics462, 116477 (2025)

work page 2025
[57]

J. M. Verosky, Negative powers of olver recursion operators, Journal of mathematical physics32, 1733 (1991)

work page 1991
[58]

Qiao and E

Z. Qiao and E. Fan, Negative-order korteweg–de vries equations, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics86, 016601 (2012)

work page 2012
[59]

M. I. Ismailov and C. Sabaz, Inverse scattering method via the gel’fand–levitan–marchenko equation for some negative- order nonlinear wave equations, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics222, 20 (2025)

work page 2025
[60]

Sundermeyer,Constrained dynamics with applications to Yang-Mills theory, general relativity, classical spin, dual string model(Springer-Verlag, 1982)

K. Sundermeyer,Constrained dynamics with applications to Yang-Mills theory, general relativity, classical spin, dual string model(Springer-Verlag, 1982)

work page 1982
[61]

G. A. Sardanashvily,Generalized Hamiltonian formalism for field theory: constraint systems(World Scientific, 1995)

work page 1995
[62]

H. J. Rothe and K. D. Rothe,Classical and quantum dynamics of constrained Hamiltonian systems(World Scientific, 2010)

work page 2010
[63]

A. A. Deriglazov,Classical mechanics, Hamiltonian and Lagrangian formalism(Springer, 2010)

work page 2010
[64]

Salisbury and K

D. Salisbury and K. Sundermeyer, L´ eon rosenfeld’s general theory of constrained hamiltonian dynamics, The European Physical Journal H42, 10.1140/epjh/e2016-70042-7 (2017)

work page doi:10.1140/epjh/e2016-70042-7 2017
[65]

L. Lusanna, Dirac–bergmann constraints in physics: Singular lagrangians, hamiltonian constraints and the second noether theorem, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics15, 1830004 (2018)

work page 2018
[66]

Russkov, Remarks on dirac-bergmann algorithm, dirac’s conjecture and the extended hamiltonian (2026), arXiv:2602.00284 [hep-th]

K. Russkov, Remarks on dirac-bergmann algorithm, dirac’s conjecture and the extended hamiltonian (2026), arXiv:2602.00284 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026