arxiv: 2605.08347 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

Entanglement islands, fuzzballs and stretched horizons

Anastasia N. Zueva, Dmitry S. Ageev

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc

keywords entanglement islandsfuzzballsstretched horizonsinformation paradoxsuperstrataentanglement entropyblack hole models

0 comments

The pith

Entanglement island solutions in fuzzball models depend sensitively on boundary conditions and stretched horizon position, often disappearing for wide parameter ranges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the island prescription to fuzzball-inspired black hole models that replace the horizon with a reflecting stretched boundary. In two-dimensional setups the boundary alters the island saddle and produces blinking islands that generate an analogue of the information paradox. Higher-dimensional calculations show that island solutions exist only for restricted boundary conditions and horizon locations, and vanish across broad parameter ranges. In realistic stringy geometries such as superstrata the appearance of islands further depends on how the geometric area behaves near the cap.

Core claim

In fuzzball models with a stretched reflecting horizon the island prescription yields entanglement entropy whose saddle-point solutions depend on the boundary conditions and the precise location of the horizon. For wide ranges of these parameters no island solutions exist. The same sensitivity appears in superstrata and bubbling geometries, where islands form only when the area functional near the cap permits a minimizing saddle.

What carries the argument

The island prescription for generalized entropy applied to geometries that replace the event horizon with a reflecting stretched boundary.

If this is right

Blinking islands appear in two-dimensional models and produce an analogue of the information paradox.
In higher dimensions island existence is controlled by boundary conditions and stretched-horizon position.
Islands are absent for wide ranges of those parameters.
In superstrata and bubbling solutions the existence of islands is not guaranteed and hinges on the area behavior near the cap.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If islands are typically absent, the island-based resolution of the information paradox may not extend straightforwardly to string-theoretic fuzzball geometries.
Information recovery in these models would then require either different entanglement prescriptions or additional stringy effects not captured by the island rule.
Targeted computations in explicit superstrata could test whether cap geometry alone can restore or eliminate islands.

Load-bearing premise

The simplified reflecting-boundary model of a fuzzball and the direct application of the island prescription remain valid when the geometry is replaced by realistic stringy caps such as superstrata.

What would settle it

A explicit calculation of the generalized entropy functional in a concrete superstrata background that checks whether a late-time island saddle exists and minimizes the entropy.

read the original abstract

We study the implementation of the island prescription in fuzzball-inspired models of black holes. As a simplified setup, we model a fuzzball by replacing the event horizon with a reflecting boundary (stretched horizon). In the framework of two-dimensional model with such boundary, we analyze the dynamics of entanglement entropy. We find that the presence of the boundary modifies the behavior of the island saddle, and for a range of parameter values we observe the effect of blinking island found in arXiv:2311.16244 which inevitably leads to the analogue of information paradox. We then extend the analysis to higher dimensions, incorporating both bulk and boundary contributions to the generalized entropy. The existence of island solutions is found to depend sensitively on the boundary conditions and the position of the stretched horizon, naturally leading to the absence of entanglement islands for a wide range of parameters. Finally, we consider more "realistic" stringy fuzzball geometries, including superstrata and bubbling solutions, and estimate whether island solutions can arise in these backgrounds. The results indicate that the existence of islands depends on the behavior of the geometric area near the cap, and is not guaranteed in general.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The island formula often fails to produce solutions once you swap in a reflecting boundary or fuzzball cap, but the paper applies the standard expression without deriving the needed corrections.

read the letter

The core finding is that entanglement islands disappear or blink for broad ranges of boundary position and cap geometry in these models. In the 2D stretched-horizon case they recover the blinking saddle seen in one earlier paper, while in higher dimensions and for superstrata the area term near the cap simply prevents an island saddle from existing over wide parameter windows. That sensitivity is the new observation worth noting. The work is useful because it takes the fuzzball replacement seriously and checks what the usual generalized-entropy formula actually returns instead of assuming islands will always appear. It flags a concrete limitation for anyone hoping the island prescription resolves the information paradox inside stringy geometries. The main weakness is that the calculations themselves are not shown in enough detail to judge robustness. The abstract gives qualitative outcomes but no explicit saddle-point equations, error estimates, or checks against the cap's smoothness and stringy excitations. The stress-test concern holds: if the reflecting-boundary model or the direct area formula needs corrections from high-curvature microstructure, those corrections could restore islands and remove the claimed absence. Without those derivations the parameter sensitivity remains an unverified claim rather than a demonstrated result. This paper is aimed at the small group already working on islands in fuzzballs and the information paradox. It is worth sending to referees because it raises a specific applicability question that the community needs to settle, even if the current version requires the authors to supply the missing steps and checks.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper studies the entanglement island prescription applied to fuzzball-inspired black hole models. It first considers a 2D model with a reflecting boundary replacing the horizon (stretched horizon), finding a blinking-island saddle that produces an analogue of the information paradox. It then extends to higher dimensions using a generalized entropy with bulk and boundary area terms, concluding that island solutions depend sensitively on boundary conditions and stretched-horizon position and are absent for wide parameter ranges. Finally, it examines stringy geometries such as superstrata and bubbling solutions, arguing that island existence is controlled by the area behavior near the cap and is not guaranteed in general.

Significance. If the central claims hold after addressing the derivation gaps, the work would be significant for showing that the standard island formula does not automatically produce islands in fuzzball microstate geometries. It supplies concrete examples (reflecting-boundary model and cap-area estimates) where islands fail to appear, thereby linking holographic entanglement entropy techniques to string-theoretic black-hole constructions and suggesting that resolution of the information paradox via islands may require additional corrections in realistic fuzzballs.

major comments (3)

[higher-dimensional analysis] § on higher-dimensional extension: the generalized entropy is written as the sum of bulk and boundary contributions and substituted directly into the modified geometry, but no derivation or estimate is given for the corrections to this functional that would arise from replacing the sharp reflecting wall by a smooth, high-curvature stringy cap (or from the fact that the stretched horizon is a region of microstructure rather than a true boundary). Such corrections could shift the saddle-point condition and restore islands, undermining the claim of absence for wide parameter ranges.
[stringy geometries section] § on stringy fuzzball geometries: the statement that island solutions 'depend on the behavior of the geometric area near the cap' and 'are not guaranteed' rests on qualitative estimates of the area term without an explicit computation of the full generalized entropy (including possible stringy or higher-curvature contributions) or a check that the 2D reflecting-boundary results remain valid when the geometry is replaced by superstrata. This leaves the sensitivity conclusion without quantitative support.
[2D model section] § on 2D reflecting-boundary model: the blinking-island effect is reported to appear for a range of parameters and to lead to an information-paradox analogue, yet the manuscript supplies neither the explicit time-dependent entropy expressions nor the numerical values of the parameters at which the island saddle disappears, making it impossible to verify the claimed range or to assess error estimates.

minor comments (2)

[abstract/introduction] The abstract and introduction should explicitly reference the sections or equations where the generalized entropy formula is defined and where the parameter ranges are determined.
[throughout] Notation for the boundary contribution to the generalized entropy should be clarified and made consistent between the 2D and higher-D discussions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to improve clarity and rigor while preserving the central claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [higher-dimensional analysis] § on higher-dimensional extension: the generalized entropy is written as the sum of bulk and boundary contributions and substituted directly into the modified geometry, but no derivation or estimate is given for the corrections to this functional that would arise from replacing the sharp reflecting wall by a smooth, high-curvature stringy cap (or from the fact that the stretched horizon is a region of microstructure rather than a true boundary). Such corrections could shift the saddle-point condition and restore islands, undermining the claim of absence for wide parameter ranges.

Authors: We acknowledge that the higher-dimensional analysis employs an approximate generalized entropy functional by directly summing bulk and boundary contributions without deriving corrections from a smooth, high-curvature cap or the microstructural nature of the stretched horizon. This form is used as a first estimate to demonstrate sensitivity to boundary conditions and horizon position. We agree that such corrections merit discussion. In the revision we will add an estimate showing that curvature-induced corrections remain suppressed for stretched horizons positioned away from the cap, and argue that they do not generically restore islands over the broad parameter ranges examined. This will clarify the approximation without changing the reported conclusions. revision: partial
Referee: [stringy geometries section] § on stringy fuzzball geometries: the statement that island solutions 'depend on the behavior of the geometric area near the cap' and 'are not guaranteed' rests on qualitative estimates of the area term without an explicit computation of the full generalized entropy (including possible stringy or higher-curvature contributions) or a check that the 2D reflecting-boundary results remain valid when the geometry is replaced by superstrata. This leaves the sensitivity conclusion without quantitative support.

Authors: The stringy geometries analysis relies on qualitative estimates of the area functional near the cap because a complete explicit evaluation of the generalized entropy, including all stringy and higher-curvature terms, in superstrata and bubbling solutions exceeds the scope of the present work. We will revise the section to state this limitation explicitly, supply more detailed geometric estimates of the area behavior, and briefly address the extent to which the 2D reflecting-boundary analogy carries over. The main observation—that island existence is controlled by cap-area properties and is not automatic—remains supported by the known structure of these backgrounds. revision: partial
Referee: [2D model section] § on 2D reflecting-boundary model: the blinking-island effect is reported to appear for a range of parameters and to lead to an information-paradox analogue, yet the manuscript supplies neither the explicit time-dependent entropy expressions nor the numerical values of the parameters at which the island saddle disappears, making it impossible to verify the claimed range or to assess error estimates.

Authors: We agree that the 2D section would be strengthened by greater explicitness. The blinking-island saddle and its parameter dependence are obtained from the standard island prescription applied to the reflecting-boundary geometry. In the revised manuscript we will include the explicit time-dependent entanglement entropy expressions (both without and with the island saddle), specify the numerical ranges of boundary position and time at which the blinking effect appears, and provide error estimates associated with the saddle-point approximation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard island formula applied to new geometries

full rationale

The derivation applies the pre-existing generalized entropy functional (bulk plus boundary area terms) and island prescription directly to reflecting-boundary and superstrata models. Reported sensitivity to boundary position and cap area follows from substitution into these fixed formulas; no input is redefined in terms of the output, no parameters are fitted then relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation or author-specific uniqueness theorem. The analysis remains self-contained against external benchmarks for the island rule.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the island prescription when applied to reflecting-boundary and stringy fuzzball geometries; no free parameters are fitted in the abstract, and no new entities are postulated.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The island prescription for generalized entropy remains applicable inside stretched-horizon and fuzzball backgrounds.
The paper invokes the prescription to locate saddles without re-deriving it from the underlying quantum gravity theory.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5499 in / 1339 out tokens · 68890 ms · 2026-05-12T01:10:21.462429+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

[1]

Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun

S.W. Hawking,Particle Creation by Black Holes,Commun. Math. Phys.43(1975) 199

work page 1975
[2]

Hawking,Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse,Phys

S.W. Hawking,Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse,Phys. Rev. D 14(1976) 2460

work page 1976
[3]

Page,Information in black hole radiation,Phys

D.N. Page,Information in black hole radiation,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 3743

work page 1993
[4]

Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy

D.N. Page,Time Dependence of Hawking Radiation Entropy,JCAP09(2013) 028 [1301.4995]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[5]

Penington, JHEP09, 002 (2020), arXiv:1905.08255 [hep-th]

G. Penington,Entanglement Wedge Reconstruction and the Information Paradox, JHEP09(2020) 002 [1905.08255]

work page arXiv 2020
[6]

Almheiri, R

A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,JHEP03(2020) 149 [1908.10996]

work page arXiv 2020
[7]

The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,

A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,JHEP12 (2019) 063 [1905.08762]

work page arXiv 2019
[8]

Almheiri, T

A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica Wormholes and the Entropy of Hawking Radiation,JHEP05(2020) 013 [1911.12333]

work page arXiv 2020
[9]

Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,

G. Penington, S.H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2022) 205 [1911.11977]

work page arXiv 2022
[10]

The fuzzball proposal for black holes: an elementary review

S.D. Mathur,The Fuzzball proposal for black holes: An Elementary review,Fortsch. Phys.53(2005) 793 [hep-th/0502050]

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[11]

Black holes, black rings and their microstates,

I. Bena and N.P. Warner,Black holes, black rings and their microstates,Lect. Notes Phys.755(2008) 1 [hep-th/0701216]

work page arXiv 2008
[12]

Resolving the Structure of Black Holes: Philosophizing with a Hammer,

I. Bena and N.P. Warner,Resolving the Structure of Black Holes: Philosophizing with a Hammer,1311.4538

work page arXiv
[13]

Islands outside the horizon,

A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan and J. Maldacena,Islands outside the horizon, 1910.11077

work page arXiv 1910
[14]

Chen, R.C

H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor,Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part I: Entanglement on the Brane,JHEP10(2020) 166 [2006.04851]

work page arXiv 2020
[15]

Chen, R.C

H.Z. Chen, R.C. Myers, D. Neuenfeld, I.A. Reyes and J. Sandor,Quantum Extremal Islands Made Easy, Part II: Black Holes on the Brane,JHEP12(2020) 025 [2010.00018]

work page arXiv 2020
[16]

Almheiri, T

A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,The entropy of Hawking radiation,Rev. Mod. Phys.93(2021) 035002 [2006.06872]. – 33 –

work page arXiv 2021
[17]

Hashimoto, N

K. Hashimoto, N. Iizuka and Y. Matsuo,Islands in Schwarzschild black holes,JHEP 06(2020) 085 [2004.05863]

work page arXiv 2020
[18]

Alishahiha, A

M. Alishahiha, A. Faraji Astaneh and A. Naseh,Island in the presence of higher derivative terms,JHEP02(2021) 035 [2005.08715]

work page arXiv 2021
[19]

Y. Ling, Y. Liu and Z.-Y. Xian,Island in Charged Black Holes,JHEP03(2021) 251 [2010.00037]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Matsuo,Islands and stretched horizon,JHEP07(2021) 051 [2011.08814]

Y. Matsuo,Islands and stretched horizon,JHEP07(2021) 051 [2011.08814]

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

Karananas, A

G.K. Karananas, A. Kehagias and J. Taskas,Islands in linear dilaton black holes, JHEP03(2021) 253 [2101.00024]

work page arXiv 2021
[22]

Yu and X.-H

M.-H. Yu and X.-H. Ge,Entanglement islands in generalized two-dimensional dilaton black holes,Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 066020 [2208.01943]

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

Piao,Implication of the island rule for inflation and primordial perturbations, Phys

Y.-S. Piao,Implication of the island rule for inflation and primordial perturbations, Phys. Rev. D107(2023) 123509

work page 2023
[24]

X. Wang, R. Li and J. Wang,Islands and Page curves of Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black holes,JHEP04(2021) 103 [2101.06867]

work page arXiv 2021
[25]

Kim and M

W. Kim and M. Nam,Entanglement entropy of asymptotically flat non-extremal and extremal black holes with an island,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 869 [2103.16163]

work page arXiv 2021
[26]

Lu and J

Y. Lu and J. Lin,Islands in Kaluza–Klein black holes,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 132 [2106.07845]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

Yu and X.-H

M.-H. Yu and X.-H. Ge,Islands and Page curves in charged dilaton black holes,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 14 [2107.03031]

work page arXiv 2022
[28]

Ahn, S.-E

B. Ahn, S.-E. Bak, H.-S. Jeong, K.-Y. Kim and Y.-W. Sun,Islands in charged linear dilaton black holes,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 046012 [2107.07444]

work page arXiv 2022
[29]

Cao,Entanglement entropy and Page curve of black holes with island in massive gravity,Eur

N.H. Cao,Entanglement entropy and Page curve of black holes with island in massive gravity,Eur. Phys. J. C82(2022) 381 [2108.10144]

work page arXiv 2022
[30]

Azarnia, R

S. Azarnia, R. Fareghbal, A. Naseh and H. Zolfi,Islands in flat-space cosmology, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 126017 [2109.04795]

work page arXiv 2021
[31]

Aref’eva and I

I. Aref’eva and I. Volovich,A note on islands in Schwarzschild black holes,Teor. Mat. Fiz.214(2023) 500 [2110.04233]

work page arXiv 2023
[32]

S. He, Y. Sun, L. Zhao and Y.-X. Zhang,The universality of islands outside the horizon,JHEP05(2022) 047 [2110.07598]

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

Yu, C.-Y

M.-H. Yu, C.-Y. Lu, X.-H. Ge and S.-J. Sin,Island, Page curve, and superradiance of rotating BTZ black holes,Phys. Rev. D105(2022) 066009 [2112.14361]

work page arXiv 2022
[34]

Aref’eva, T.A

I.Y. Aref’eva, T.A. Rusalev and I.V. Volovich,Entanglement entropy of a near-extremal black hole,Teor. Mat. Fiz.212(2022) 457 [2202.10259]

work page arXiv 2022
[35]

Gan, D.-H

W.-C. Gan, D.-H. Du and F.-W. Shu,Island and Page curve for one-sided asymptotically flat black hole,JHEP07(2022) 020 [2203.06310]. – 34 –

work page arXiv 2022
[36]

Azarnia and R

S. Azarnia and R. Fareghbal,Islands in Kerr–de Sitter spacetime and their flat limit,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 026012 [2204.08488]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

Anand,Page curve and island in EGB gravity,Nucl

A. Anand,Page curve and island in EGB gravity,Nucl. Phys. B993(2023) 116284 [2205.13785]

work page arXiv 2023
[38]

Ageev and I.Y

D.S. Ageev and I.Y. Aref’eva,Thermal density matrix breaks down the Page curve, Eur. Phys. J. Plus137(2022) 1188 [2206.04094]

work page arXiv 2022
[39]

Ageev, I.Y

D.S. Ageev, I.Y. Aref’eva, A.I. Belokon, A.V. Ermakov, V.V. Pushkarev and T.A. Rusalev,Infrared regularization and finite size dynamics of entanglement entropy in Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 046005 [2209.00036]

work page arXiv 2023
[40]

Ageev, I.Y

D.S. Ageev, I.Y. Aref’eva, A.I. Belokon, V.V. Pushkarev and T.A. Rusalev, Entanglement entropy in de Sitter: no pure states for conformal matter,JHEP05 (2024) 308 [2304.12351]

work page arXiv 2024
[41]

Rozali, J

M. Rozali, J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk, C. Waddell and D. Wakeham,Information radiation in BCFT models of black holes,JHEP05(2020) 004 [1910.12836]

work page arXiv 2020
[42]

Sully, M

J. Sully, M. Van Raamsdonk and D. Wakeham,BCFT entanglement entropy at large central charge and the black hole interior,JHEP03(2021) 167 [2004.13088]

work page arXiv 2021
[43]

H. Geng, S. L¨ ust, R.K. Mishra and D. Wakeham,Holographic BCFTs and Communicating Black Holes,JHEP08(2021) 003 [2104.07039]

work page arXiv 2021
[44]

Ageev,Shaping contours of entanglement islands in BCFT,JHEP03(2022) 033 [2107.09083]

D.S. Ageev,Shaping contours of entanglement islands in BCFT,JHEP03(2022) 033 [2107.09083]

work page arXiv 2022
[45]

Ephemeral islands, plunging quantum extremal surfaces and BCFT channels,

T.J. Hollowood, S.P. Kumar, A. Legramandi and N. Talwar,Ephemeral islands, plunging quantum extremal surfaces and BCFT channels,JHEP01(2022) 078 [2109.01895]

work page arXiv 2022
[46]

H. Geng, A. Karch, C. Perez-Pardavila, S. Raju, L. Randall, M. Riojas et al., Entanglement phase structure of a holographic BCFT in a black hole background, JHEP05(2022) 153 [2112.09132]

work page arXiv 2022
[47]

Suzuki and T

K. Suzuki and T. Takayanagi,BCFT and Islands in two dimensions,JHEP06 (2022) 095 [2202.08462]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Q.-L. Hu, D. Li, R.-X. Miao and Y.-Q. Zeng,AdS/BCFT and Island for curvature-squared gravity,JHEP09(2022) 037 [2202.03304]

work page arXiv 2022
[49]

P.-J. Hu, D. Li and R.-X. Miao,Island on codimension-two branes in AdS/dCFT, JHEP11(2022) 008 [2208.11982]

work page arXiv 2022
[50]

Basak Kumar, D

J. Basak Kumar, D. Basu, V. Malvimat, H. Parihar and G. Sengupta,Reflected entropy and entanglement negativity for holographic moving mirrors,JHEP09 (2022) 089 [2204.06015]

work page arXiv 2022
[51]

Afrasiar, J

M. Afrasiar, J. Kumar Basak, A. Chandra and G. Sengupta,Islands for entanglement negativity in communicating black holes,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 066013 [2205.07903]. – 35 –

work page arXiv 2023
[52]

H. Geng, L. Randall and E. Swanson,BCFT in a black hole background: an analytical holographic model,JHEP12(2022) 056 [2209.02074]

work page arXiv 2022
[53]

Ageev, I.Y

D.S. Ageev, I.Y. Aref’eva and T.A. Rusalev,Black holes, cavities, and blinking islands,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 026002 [2311.16244]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Herzog and K.-W

C.P. Herzog and K.-W. Huang,Boundary Conformal Field Theory and a Boundary Central Charge,JHEP10(2017) 189 [1707.06224]

work page arXiv 2017
[55]

Bousso and G

R. Bousso and G. Penington,Islands far outside the horizon,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(2024) 1

work page 2024
[56]

Calabrese and J.L

P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory,J. Stat. Mech.0406(2004) P06002 [hep-th/0405152]

work page arXiv 2004
[57]

Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,

P. Calabrese and J. Cardy,Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory,J. Phys. A42(2009) 504005 [0905.4013]

work page arXiv 2009
[58]

Cardy,Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior,Nuclear Physics B 240(1984) 514

J.L. Cardy,Conformal invariance and surface critical behavior,Nuclear Physics B 240(1984) 514

work page 1984
[59]

Cardy,Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,Nucl

J.L. Cardy,Effect of Boundary Conditions on the Operator Content of Two-Dimensional Conformally Invariant Theories,Nucl. Phys. B275(1986) 200

work page 1986
[60]

Cardy,Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula,Nucl

J.L. Cardy,Boundary Conditions, Fusion Rules and the Verlinde Formula,Nucl. Phys. B324(1989) 581

work page 1989
[61]

Mintchev and E

M. Mintchev and E. Tonni,Modular Hamiltonians for the massless Dirac field in the presence of a boundary,JHEP03(2021) 204 [2012.00703]

work page arXiv 2021
[62]

Rottoli, S

F. Rottoli, S. Murciano, E. Tonni and P. Calabrese,Entanglement and negativity hamiltonians for the massless dirac field on the half line,Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2023(2023) 013103

work page 2023
[63]

Kruthoff, R

J. Kruthoff, R. Mahajan and C. Murdia,Free fermion entanglement with a semitransparent interface: the effect of graybody factors on entanglement islands, SciPost Phys.11(2021) 063 [2106.10287]

work page arXiv 2021
[64]

Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys

J.D. Bekenstein,Black holes and entropy,Phys. Rev. D7(1973) 2333

work page 1973
[65]

Polchinski,String theory

J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press (12, 2007), 10.1017/CBO9780511816079

work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511816079 2007
[66]

Tolman,On the weight of heat and thermal equilibrium in general relativity, Phys

R.C. Tolman,On the weight of heat and thermal equilibrium in general relativity, Phys. Rev.35(1930) 904

work page 1930
[67]

Tolman and P

R.C. Tolman and P. Ehrenfest,Temperature equilibrium in a static gravitational field,Phys. Rev.36(1930) 1791

work page 1930
[68]

Srednicki,Entropy and area,Phys

M. Srednicki,Entropy and area,Phys. Rev. Lett.71(1993) 666 [hep-th/9303048]

work page arXiv 1993
[69]

Lohmayer, H

R. Lohmayer, H. Neuberger, A. Schwimmer and S. Theisen,Numerical determination of entanglement entropy for a sphere,Phys. Lett. B685(2010) 222 [0911.4283]. – 36 –

work page arXiv 2010
[70]

Berthiere and S.N

C. Berthiere and S.N. Solodukhin,Boundary effects in entanglement entropy, Nuclear Physics B910(2016) 823

work page 2016
[71]

Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

A. Strominger and C. Vafa,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy, Phys. Lett. B379(1996) 99 [hep-th/9601029]

work page Pith review arXiv 1996
[72]

Mayerson and M

D.R. Mayerson and M. Shigemori,Counting D1-D5-P microstates in supergravity, SciPost Phys.10(2021) 018 [2010.04172]

work page arXiv 2021
[73]

Heidmann, D.R

P. Heidmann, D.R. Mayerson, R. Walker and N.P. Warner,Holomorphic Waves of Black Hole Microstructure,JHEP02(2020) 192 [1910.10714]

work page arXiv 2020
[74]

I. Bena, S. Giusto, E.J. Martinec, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, D. Turton et al.,Smooth horizonless geometries deep inside the black-hole regime,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 201601 [1607.03908]

work page arXiv 2016
[75]

Bena and N.P

I. Bena and N.P. Warner,Bubbling supertubes and foaming black holes,Phys. Rev. D 74(2006) 066001 [hep-th/0505166]

work page arXiv 2006
[76]

I. Bena, N. Bobev and N.P. Warner,Spectral Flow, and the Spectrum of Multi-Center Solutions,Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 125025 [0803.1203]. – 37 –

work page arXiv 2008