arxiv: 2605.08653 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 💻 cs.AI

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

C2L-Net: A Data-Driven Model for State-of-Charge Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries During Discharge

Khoa Tran , T. Nguyen-Thoi , Vin Nguyen-Thai , Duong Tran Anh , Hung-Cuong Trinh , Tri Le

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 00:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI

keywords state-of-charge estimationlithium-ion batteriesdata-driven modelingneural networkstemporal attentionbattery managementonline estimationGRU

0 comments

The pith

C2L-Net estimates lithium-ion battery state of charge accurately from just 20 seconds of data by separating context from recent measurements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops C2L-Net to perform accurate online estimation of a lithium-ion battery's state of charge without relying on long input histories that slow down computation and introduce bias. It separates the encoding of a short 20-second contextual window from the updating step that incorporates the latest measurement, using chunk-based extraction, causal attention, and a recursive-style decoder. This design allows the model to capture nonlinear battery dynamics efficiently. A reader would care because reliable and fast SOC estimates are essential for the safety and performance of electric vehicles and portable devices in real-time operation.

Core claim

C2L-Net achieves state-of-the-art or competitive accuracy in SOC estimation using only a short 20-second historical window through a context-to-latest framework. The model features chunk-based feature extraction with Theta Attention Pooling and Fourier Seasonality Basis to reduce sequence length, a causal context encoder combining GRU with Causal Cosine Attention, and a latest-measurement decoder that updates the state responsively. Experiments on drive-cycle datasets at fixed temperatures show it matches baseline accuracy while delivering up to 60 times faster inference and using fewer parameters, with robust results on unseen profiles.

What carries the argument

The context-to-latest separation mechanism that encodes a fixed historical window separately before updating with the most recent measurement to enable efficient temporal modeling and dynamic adaptation.

If this is right

Real-time SOC estimation becomes feasible in resource-constrained battery management systems due to reduced inference time.
Models can maintain accuracy across varying driving conditions without requiring extended sequence inputs.
Fewer parameters allow deployment on edge devices in electric vehicles and energy storage systems.
Padding biases at the start of drive cycles are avoided by using short fixed windows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The separation technique could extend to other sequential prediction problems where computational speed matters, such as weather forecasting or stock price modeling.
Further tests on batteries with different chemistries or under temperature variations would clarify the limits of the 20-second window assumption.
Integrating this with physics-based models might yield hybrid approaches with even better generalization.

Load-bearing premise

A 20-second historical window is long enough to capture all relevant battery dynamics for accurate estimation without information loss from shorter contexts.

What would settle it

Running the model on a new set of drive cycles at varying temperatures and observing whether its estimation error remains comparable to long-sequence models would test the claim.

read the original abstract

Accurate state-of-charge (SOC) estimation is critical for the safe and efficient operation of lithium-ion batteries in battery management systems (BMS). Although data-driven approaches can effectively capture nonlinear battery dynamics, many existing methods rely on long historical input sequences, resulting in high computational cost and introducing padding-induced positional bias at the beginning of drive cycles. To address these limitations, we propose C2L-Net, a novel context-to-latest data-driven framework for realistic online SOC estimation using only a short historical window (20 s). Unlike existing short-receptive-field or long-history models, the proposed framework explicitly separates contextual encoding from latest-measurement updating, enabling both efficient temporal modeling and rapid adaptation to dynamic battery states. The proposed model incorporates a chunk-based feature extraction mechanism that combines Theta Attention Pooling with a Fourier-based Seasonality Basis to capture local temporal patterns while reducing sequence length. A causal context encoder, integrating a gated recurrent unit (GRU) with Causal Cosine Attention, models temporal dependencies without information leakage. Furthermore, a latest-measurement decoder, inspired by recursive filtering, updates the contextual state using the most recent measurement, enhancing responsiveness to dynamic operating conditions. Extensive experiments on a public lithium-ion battery drive-cycle dataset under multiple fixed-temperature conditions demonstrate that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art or competitive accuracy while significantly improving computational efficiency. In particular, C2L-Net achieves up to 60 times faster inference and requires fewer parameters than recent data-driven baselines, while maintaining robust performance across unseen driving profiles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

C2L-Net's context-to-latest split with chunked attention looks like a workable way to cut computation on short 20-second windows for battery SOC, but the abstract gives no numbers or ablations to back the efficiency and accuracy claims.

read the letter

The main thing here is the explicit split between a context encoder and a latest-measurement decoder. That lets the model stick to a fixed 20-second window instead of long histories, while trying to avoid padding bias at the start of drive cycles. The chunk-based Theta Attention Pooling plus Fourier Seasonality Basis reduces sequence length for local patterns, the GRU with Causal Cosine Attention keeps temporal modeling causal, and the decoder draws from recursive filtering to update quickly with new data. Those pieces add up to a coherent response to the usual trade-offs in data-driven SOC work.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces C2L-Net, a data-driven architecture for online SOC estimation of Li-ion batteries during discharge. It employs a fixed 20-second historical window with explicit separation of contextual encoding (via GRU + causal cosine attention) from a latest-measurement decoder, chunk-based feature extraction using Theta Attention Pooling and Fourier Seasonality Basis, and claims competitive accuracy with up to 60x faster inference and fewer parameters than baselines on public drive-cycle datasets under fixed-temperature conditions.

Significance. If the efficiency and accuracy claims are substantiated with quantitative results, the work could meaningfully advance real-time BMS applications by reducing computational overhead while addressing padding bias in short-sequence models. The context-to-latest separation and chunked attention mechanisms represent a targeted architectural response to known limitations of long-history data-driven SOC estimators.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of 'state-of-the-art or competitive accuracy' and 'up to 60 times faster inference' are stated without any reported RMSE, MAE, or other quantitative error metrics, ablation results, or details on training/validation splits and unseen profile definitions, preventing verification of the performance assertions.
[Method] Method (context-to-latest framework and 20 s window): The assumption that a fixed 20-second receptive field plus chunked Theta-Attention/Fourier basis and causal cosine attention suffices to model all relevant nonlinear dynamics (including slow electrochemical diffusion with time constants >1 min) is load-bearing for the online estimation claims, yet no ablation on window length, relaxation-period analysis, or comparison to 60–300 s histories is described.
[Experiments] Experiments: Robustness 'across unseen driving profiles' and 'multiple fixed-temperature conditions' is asserted, but without reported cross-validation details, temperature-specific error tables, or statistical significance tests, the generalization claims cannot be assessed.

minor comments (2)

[Method] Notation for the Fourier-based Seasonality Basis and Causal Cosine Attention should be defined with explicit equations and dimensions in the main text rather than relying solely on diagrams.
[Abstract] The abstract mentions 'public lithium-ion battery drive-cycle dataset' but does not name the specific dataset (e.g., Oxford or NASA) or provide a citation; this should be added for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of 'state-of-the-art or competitive accuracy' and 'up to 60 times faster inference' are stated without any reported RMSE, MAE, or other quantitative error metrics, ablation results, or details on training/validation splits and unseen profile definitions, preventing verification of the performance assertions.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including quantitative metrics. The full manuscript reports RMSE, MAE, and inference-time comparisons in Section 4, along with details on the train/validation/test splits using distinct drive cycles. We will revise the abstract to report representative values (e.g., average RMSE on unseen profiles and the observed inference speedup) and a concise description of the evaluation protocol. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] Method (context-to-latest framework and 20 s window): The assumption that a fixed 20-second receptive field plus chunked Theta-Attention/Fourier basis and causal cosine attention suffices to model all relevant nonlinear dynamics (including slow electrochemical diffusion with time constants >1 min) is load-bearing for the online estimation claims, yet no ablation on window length, relaxation-period analysis, or comparison to 60–300 s histories is described.

Authors: The 20 s window combined with the recursive latest-measurement decoder is intended to capture fast drive-cycle dynamics while allowing iterative state updates to track slower effects. We acknowledge that an explicit ablation study would provide stronger support. In the revised manuscript we will add an ablation subsection comparing window lengths of 10 s, 20 s, and 60 s, together with performance analysis on any available relaxation intervals in the dataset. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] Experiments: Robustness 'across unseen driving profiles' and 'multiple fixed-temperature conditions' is asserted, but without reported cross-validation details, temperature-specific error tables, or statistical significance tests, the generalization claims cannot be assessed.

Authors: Section 3 details the dataset splits and the use of held-out driving profiles for testing under fixed temperatures (0 °C, 25 °C, 45 °C), with corresponding error tables in Section 4. To address the request fully, we will expand the experimental section with k-fold cross-validation results, additional temperature-specific tables, and statistical significance tests (e.g., paired t-tests) comparing C2L-Net against the baselines. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical performance on external public data

full rationale

The paper presents C2L-Net as a neural architecture (chunked Theta-Attention + Fourier basis, causal GRU with cosine attention, latest-measurement decoder) trained end-to-end on public lithium-ion drive-cycle datasets. All reported metrics (RMSE, MAE, inference speed, parameter count) are direct empirical outcomes of supervised training and testing on held-out profiles; no first-principles derivation, uniqueness theorem, or equation is claimed whose output is forced by construction to equal its inputs. The 20 s window and context-to-latest split are explicit design choices whose sufficiency is validated by cross-profile experiments rather than by self-definition or self-citation. No load-bearing step reduces to a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction or to an ansatz imported from prior author work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard neural network training assumptions plus domain-specific premises about battery temporal dynamics; no new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)

20-second window length
Chosen as the short historical input size; its sufficiency is central to the efficiency claim.
Model hyperparameters (attention heads, GRU size, etc.)
Standard neural net parameters fitted during training on the dataset.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Battery SOC dynamics within a 20 s window can be adequately captured by chunk-based attention and causal recurrent encoding without long-range dependencies.
Invoked by the choice of short window and architecture to enable online estimation.
standard math Causal Cosine Attention prevents information leakage in temporal modeling.
Standard property of causal attention mechanisms assumed to hold here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1443 out tokens · 42320 ms · 2026-05-12T00:58:39.899032+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/ArithmeticFromLogic LogicNat unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

short historical window (20 s)... L=200... N=5 chunks

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

27 extracted references · 27 canonical work pages

[1]

IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification (2025)

Li, C., Li, L., Zhang, Q., Zhou, S., Li, M., Rao, Z.: Lightweight state of charge estimation of lithium-ion battery based on pruned neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification (2025)

work page 2025
[2]

Journal of Energy Storage80, 110004 (2024) 21

Hu, C., Cheng, F., Zhao, Y., Guo, S., Ma, L.: State of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on data augmentation with generative adversarial network. Journal of Energy Storage80, 110004 (2024) 21

work page 2024
[3]

Results in Engineering27, 106038 (2025)

Saranathan, L., Vairavasundaram, I., Ashok, B.: Navigating the spectrum of bat- tery health management in electric vehicles: A comprehensive review. Results in Engineering27, 106038 (2025)

work page 2025
[4]

Journal of Cleaner Production521, 146229 (2025)

Wang, K., Lin, X., Zhang, X., Zheng, J., He, H., Xu, Y., Wang, D., Zheng, Z., Huang, Y.: Integrated approaches for lithium-ion battery state estimation and life prediction: A critical review of model-driven, data-driven, and hybrid techniques. Journal of Cleaner Production521, 146229 (2025)

work page 2025
[5]

Journal of Energy Storage86, 111396 (2024)

Ge, Y., Ma, J., Sun, G.: A structural pruning method for lithium-ion batter- ies remaining useful life prediction model with multi-head attention mechanism. Journal of Energy Storage86, 111396 (2024)

work page 2024
[6]

Energy302, 131700 (2024)

Cai, N., Que, X., Zhang, X., Feng, W., Zhou, Y.: A deep learning framework for the joint prediction of the soh and rul of lithium-ion batteries based on bimodal images. Energy302, 131700 (2024)

work page 2024
[7]

Applied Energy398, 126427 (2025)

Yang, L., He, M., Ren, Y., Gao, B., Qi, H.: Physics-informed neural network for co-estimation of state of health, remaining useful life, and short-term degradation path in lithium-ion batteries. Applied Energy398, 126427 (2025)

work page 2025
[8]

Journal of Power Sources591, 233842 (2024)

Sun, J., Kainz, J.: State of health estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on current interrupt method and genetic algorithm optimized back propagation neural network. Journal of Power Sources591, 233842 (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

Neural Computing and Applications 38(8), 263 (2026)

Subashini, B., Evangeline, S.I.: Physics-guided time-series transformer for accu- rate and robust battery soc estimation. Neural Computing and Applications 38(8), 263 (2026)

work page 2026
[10]

Neural Computing and Applications36(30), 19157–19171 (2024)

Wong, R.H., Sooriamoorthy, D., Manoharan, A., Binti Sariff, N., Hilmi Ismail, Z.: Balancing accuracy and efficiency: a homogeneous ensemble approach for lithium- ion battery state of charge estimation in electric vehicles. Neural Computing and Applications36(30), 19157–19171 (2024)

work page 2024
[11]

Measurement science and technology16(12), 93– 110 (2005)

Pop, V., Bergveld, H.J., Notten, P., Regtien, P.P.: State-of-the-art of battery state-of-charge determination. Measurement science and technology16(12), 93– 110 (2005)

work page 2005
[12]

Journal of Energy Storage8, 244–256 (2016)

Westerhoff, U., Kroker, T., Kurbach, K., Kurrat, M.: Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy based estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage8, 244–256 (2016)

work page 2016
[13]

Frontiers in Energy Research10, 914291 (2022)

He, J., Meng, S., Yan, F.: A comparative study of soc estimation based on equivalent circuit models. Frontiers in Energy Research10, 914291 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

Energy Reports8, 81–87 (2022) 22

Cui, Z., Hu, W., Zhang, G., Zhang, Z., Chen, Z.: An extended kalman filter based soc estimation method for li-ion battery. Energy Reports8, 81–87 (2022) 22

work page 2022
[15]

Journal of Power Sources414, 158–166 (2019)

Chen, Z., Sun, H., Dong, G., Wei, J., Wu, J.: Particle filter-based state-of-charge estimation and remaining-dischargeable-time prediction method for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Power Sources414, 158–166 (2019)

work page 2019
[16]

Applied energy204, 1275–1283 (2017)

Tang, X., Liu, B., Lv, Z., Gao, F.: Observer based battery soc estimation: Using multi-gain-switching approach. Applied energy204, 1275–1283 (2017)

work page 2017
[17]

Journal of Energy Storage110, 115340 (2025)

Bage, A.N., Takyi-Aninakwa, P., Yang, X., Tu, Q.H.: Enhanced moving-step unscented transformed-dual extended kalman filter for accurate soc estimation of lithium-ion batteries considering temperature uncertainties. Journal of Energy Storage110, 115340 (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

International Journal of Dynamics and Control13(1), 21 (2025)

Chen, X., Wang, K.: Design of a novel robust uio estimator with predefined convergence time for the state of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries. International Journal of Dynamics and Control13(1), 21 (2025)

work page 2025
[19]

IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology73(6), 7838–7851 (2024)

Bao, Z., Nie, J., Lin, H., Gao, K., He, Z., Gao, M.: Ttsnet: State-of-charge esti- mation of li-ion battery in electrical vehicles with temporal transformer-based sequence network. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology73(6), 7838–7851 (2024)

work page 2024
[20]

Journal of Energy Storage107, 114888 (2025)

Yao, J., Kowal, J.: A multi-scale data-driven framework for online state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries with a novel public drive cycle dataset. Journal of Energy Storage107, 114888 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

N., Carpov, D., Chapados, N., and Bengio, Y

Oreshkin, B.N., Carpov, D., Chapados, N., Bengio, Y.: N-beats: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecasting. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10437 (2019)

work page arXiv 1905
[22]

Welch, G., Bishop, G., et al.: An introduction to the kalman filter (1995)

work page 1995
[23]

Journal of Applied Technology and Innovation7(3) (2023)

Meng, L.K., Yi, H.H., Wei, N.B., Xin, L.J., Salam, Z.A.A., et al.: A machine learning approach for face mask detection system with adamw optimizer. Journal of Applied Technology and Innovation7(3) (2023)

work page 2023
[24]

In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp

Lea, C., Vidal, R., Reiter, A., Hager, G.D.: Temporal convolutional networks: A unified approach to action segmentation. In: European Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 47–54 (2016). Springer

work page 2016
[25]

Advances in neural information processing systems30(2017)

Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A.N., Kaiser, L., Polosukhin, I.: Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems30(2017)

work page 2017
[26]

In: Intelligent Computing-Proceedings of the Computing Conference, pp

Mongaras, G., Dohm, T., Larson, E.: Cottention: Linear transformers with cosine attention. In: Intelligent Computing-Proceedings of the Computing Conference, pp. 485–500 (2025). Springer 23

work page 2025
[27]

Supervised sequence labelling with recur- rent neural networks, 37–45 (2012) 24

Graves, A.: Long short-term memory. Supervised sequence labelling with recur- rent neural networks, 37–45 (2012) 24

work page 2012