Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremA functional limit theorem for self-normalized linear processes with random coefficients and i.i.d. heavy-tailed innovations
Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:57 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Self-normalized partial sums of linear processes with random coefficients and heavy-tailed innovations converge in the Skorokhod M2 topology under a bounded partial sums condition.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
Under the condition that all partial sums of the series of coefficients are almost surely bounded between zero and the sum of the series, the self-normalized partial sum process of the strictly stationary linear process converges in distribution in the space of cadlag functions on [0,1] equipped with the Skorokhod M2 topology.
What carries the argument
The self-normalized partial sum process of the linear process, with normalization taken from the process itself, under the almost-sure boundedness condition on the partial sums of the random coefficients.
If this is right
- The theorem covers linear processes whose coefficients vary randomly from realization to realization while preserving strict stationarity.
- Self-normalization removes the need to estimate a separate scale parameter when the innovations have infinite variance.
- Convergence in the M2 topology permits sample paths with jumps, which is natural for heavy-tailed driving noise.
- The result supplies a functional version that can be used to derive limit theorems for statistics built from the entire path, not just the endpoint.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The boundedness condition on coefficient partial sums might be verified directly for many parametric families of random coefficients used in practice.
- Because M2 is weaker than the J1 topology, the result may continue to hold in situations where the limiting path has more discontinuities than standard stable Levy processes allow under J1.
- The same normalization and topology could be tested for linear processes whose innovations are only stationary rather than i.i.d., though that extension lies outside the present argument.
Load-bearing premise
All partial sums of the series of coefficients are almost surely bounded between zero and the sum of the series.
What would settle it
A concrete counterexample process in which the partial sums of the coefficients are not a.s. bounded between zero and the total sum, yet the self-normalized sums still converge in the Skorokhod M2 topology, would show the condition is not necessary.
read the original abstract
In this article we derive a self-normalized functional limit theorem for strictly stationary linear processes with i.i.d. heavy-tailed innovations and random coefficients under the condition that all partial sums of the series of coefficients are a.s. bounded between zero and the sum of the series. The convergence takes part in the space of c\`{a}dl\`{a}g functions on $[0,1]$ with the Skorokhod $M_{2}$ topology.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper derives a self-normalized functional limit theorem for strictly stationary linear processes with i.i.d. heavy-tailed innovations and random coefficients. The result holds under the explicit condition that all partial sums of the coefficient series are almost surely bounded between zero and the total sum of the series, with convergence established in the space of càdlàg functions on [0,1] under the Skorokhod M2 topology.
Significance. If the derivation is valid, the result extends existing functional limit theorems to self-normalized partial-sum processes with random coefficients and infinite-variance innovations. This is relevant for modeling dependent heavy-tailed time series where standard normalization fails, and the M2 topology choice accommodates the jump structure induced by heavy tails.
major comments (1)
- [Abstract / main assumption] The central theorem is conditioned on the partial-sum boundedness assumption for the random coefficients (stated in the abstract and presumably used in the tightness and convergence arguments). The manuscript provides no verification, examples, or sufficient conditions under which this a.s. boundedness holds for standard random-coefficient models, leaving open whether the result applies beyond specially constructed cases.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We are grateful to the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments. Below, we provide a point-by-point response to the major comment and outline the revisions we plan to make.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Abstract / main assumption] The central theorem is conditioned on the partial-sum boundedness assumption for the random coefficients (stated in the abstract and presumably used in the tightness and convergence arguments). The manuscript provides no verification, examples, or sufficient conditions under which this a.s. boundedness holds for standard random-coefficient models, leaving open whether the result applies beyond specially constructed cases.
Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not currently include explicit verification or examples for the partial-sum boundedness assumption. This is a valid point, and we will revise the paper to address it. In the revised manuscript, we will insert a new Remark following the statement of the main assumption, providing sufficient conditions under which the boundedness holds. Specifically, a sufficient condition is that the random coefficients are non-negative almost surely. In this case, the partial sums are monotonically non-decreasing and hence bounded above by the infinite sum (which is assumed finite in the context of the linear process). We will also provide a concrete example, such as a random coefficient AR(1) model where the coefficient is uniform on [0, 0.5], ensuring the condition holds a.s. This will demonstrate that the result applies to standard models beyond specially constructed cases. We believe this addition will clarify the scope of the theorem without altering the main results. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; standard limit theorem derivation
full rationale
The paper derives a conditional functional limit theorem for self-normalized partial sums of a linear process. The key assumption (partial sums of coefficients a.s. bounded between 0 and the total sum) is stated explicitly as a sufficient condition for tightness and convergence in the Skorokhod M2 topology. All steps are standard probabilistic arguments (characteristic functions, truncation, weak convergence criteria) applied to the given stationary process with i.i.d. heavy-tailed innovations; none reduce by construction to the target statement, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains. The result is a genuine theorem under the stated regime rather than a tautology or renaming of inputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math Properties of the Skorokhod M2 topology on the space of càdlàg functions
- domain assumption Strict stationarity of the linear process
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclearself-normalized functional limit theorem ... in the space of càdlàg functions on [0,1] with the Skorokhod M2 topology
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclearunder the condition that all partial sums of the series of coefficients are a.s. bounded between zero and the sum of the series
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Astrauskas, Limit theorems for sums of linearly generated random variables,Lith
A. Astrauskas, Limit theorems for sums of linearly generated random variables,Lith. Math. J.23(1983), 127–134
work page 1983
- [2]
- [3]
- [4]
-
[5]
B. Basrak and D. Krizmani´ c, A limit theorem for moving averages in theα–stable domain of attraction,Stochastic Process. Appl.124(2014), 1070–1083. 34 DANIJEL KRIZMANI ´C
work page 2014
-
[6]
B. Basrak and J. Segers, Regularly varying multivariate time series,Stochastic Process. Appl. 119(2009), 1055–1080
work page 2009
-
[7]
B. Basrak and A. Tafro, A complete convergence theorem for stationary regularly varying multivariate time series,Extremes19(2016), 549–560
work page 2016
-
[8]
Billingsley,Convergence of Probability Measures, John Wiley & Sons, Ney York, 1968
P. Billingsley,Convergence of Probability Measures, John Wiley & Sons, Ney York, 1968
work page 1968
-
[9]
N. H. Bingham, C. M. Goldie and J. L. Teugels,Regular variation, Cambridge University Press,
-
[10]
Y. K. Choi, H. J. Moon, Self-normalized weak limit theorems for aϕ–mixing sequence,Bull. Korean Math. Soc.47(2010), 1139–1153
work page 2010
-
[11]
Y. K. Choi, S. H. Sung and H. J. Moon, Self-normalized limit theorems for linear processes generated byρ–mixing innovations,Lith. Math. J.57(2017), 13–29
work page 2017
-
[12]
M. Cs¨ org˝ o, B. Szyszkowicz and Q. Wang, Donsker’s theorem for self-normalized partial sums processes,Ann. Probab.31(2003), 1228–1240
work page 2003
-
[13]
R. A. Davis, Stable limits for partial sums of dependent random variables,Ann. Probab.11 (1983), 262–269
work page 1983
-
[14]
R. A. Davis and T. Hsing, Point process and partial sum convergence for weakly dependent random variables with infinite variance,Ann. Probab.23(1995), 879–917
work page 1995
-
[15]
V. de la Pe˜ na, M. J. Klass and T. L. Lai, Pseudo-maximization and self-normalized processes, Probab. Surveys4(2007), 172–192
work page 2007
- [16]
-
[17]
H. Hult and G. Samorodnitsky, Tail probabilities for infinite series of regularly varying random vectors,Bernoulli14(2008), 838–864
work page 2008
-
[18]
Kallenberg,Foundations of Modern Probability, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997
O. Kallenberg,Foundations of Modern Probability, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997
work page 1997
-
[19]
Krizmani´ c,Functional limit theorems for weakly dependent regularly varying time series, Ph.D
D. Krizmani´ c,Functional limit theorems for weakly dependent regularly varying time series, Ph.D. thesis. https://www.math.uniri.hr/∼dkrizmanic/DKthesis.pdf, 2010
work page 2010
-
[20]
Krizmani´ c, Functional weak convergence of partial maxima processes,Extremes19(2016), 7–23
D. Krizmani´ c, Functional weak convergence of partial maxima processes,Extremes19(2016), 7–23
work page 2016
-
[21]
Krizmani´ c, Joint functional convergence of partial sum and maxima for linear processes, Lith
D. Krizmani´ c, Joint functional convergence of partial sum and maxima for linear processes, Lith. Math. J.58(2018), 457–479
work page 2018
-
[22]
D. Krizmani´ c, Functional convergence for moving averages with heavy tails and random coefficients,ALEA Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.16(2019), 729–757
work page 2019
-
[23]
D. Krizmani´ c, A functional limit theorem for moving averages with weakly dependent heavy- tailed innovations,Braz. J. Probab. Stat.36(2022), 138–156
work page 2022
-
[24]
Kulik, Limit Theorems for Moving Averages with Random Coefficients and Heavy-Tailed Noise,J
R. Kulik, Limit Theorems for Moving Averages with Random Coefficients and Heavy-Tailed Noise,J. Appl. Prob.43(2006), 245–256
work page 2006
-
[25]
Kulik, Limit theorems for self-normalized linear processes,Statist
R. Kulik, Limit theorems for self-normalized linear processes,Statist. Probab. Lett.76(2006), 1947–1953
work page 2006
-
[26]
R. Kulik and P. Soulier,Heavy-Tailed Time Series, Springer, New York, 2020
work page 2020
-
[27]
M. R. Leadbetter, G. Lindgren and H. Rootz´ en,Extremes and Related Properties of Random Sequences and Processes, Springer, New York, 1983
work page 1983
-
[28]
M. R. Leadbetter and H. Rootz´ en, Extremal theory for stochastic processes,Ann. Probab. 16(1988), 431–478
work page 1988
-
[29]
M. Peligrad and H. Sang, Asymptotic properties of self-normalized linear processes with long memory,Econom. Theory28(2012), 548–569
work page 2012
-
[30]
A. Raˇ ckauskas and Ch. Suquet, Convergence of self-normalized partial sums processes in C[0,1] andD[0,1],Publications Irma Lille Nouvelle Serie, 2001, 53 (VI), pp. 1–9
work page 2001
-
[31]
A. Raˇ ckauskas and Ch. Suquet, Functional central limit theorems for self-normalized partial sums of linear processes,Lith. Math. J.51(2011), 251–259
work page 2011
-
[32]
S. I. Resnick,Extreme Values, Regular Variation, and Point Processes, Springer Sci- ence+Business Media LLC, New York, 1987
work page 1987
-
[33]
S. I. Resnick,Heavy-Tail Phenomena: Probabilistic nad Statistical Modeling, Springer Sci- ence+Business Media LLC, New York, 2007
work page 2007
-
[34]
K. Sato,L´ evy Processes and Infinitely Divisible Distributions, Cambridge Studies in Ad- vanced Mathematics Vol. 68, Cambridge Univesrity Press, Cambridge, 1999
work page 1999
-
[35]
Q. M. Shao, Q. Wang, Self-normalized limit theorems: A survey,Probab. Surv.10(2013), 69–93. FUNCTIONAL LIMIT THEOREM FOR SELF-NORMALIZED LINEAR PROCESSES 35
work page 2013
-
[36]
M. Tyran-Kami´ nska, Convergence to L´ evy stable processes under some weak dependence conditions,Stochastic Process. Appl.120(2010), 1629–1650
work page 2010
-
[37]
M. Tyran-Kami´ nska, Functional limit theorems for linear processes in the domain of attrac- tion of stable laws,Stat. Probab. Lett.80(2010), 975–981
work page 2010
-
[38]
Whitt,Stochastic-Process Limits, Springer-Verlag LLC, New York, 2002
W. Whitt,Stochastic-Process Limits, Springer-Verlag LLC, New York, 2002
work page 2002
-
[39]
W. B. Wu, Unit root testing for functional of linear processes,Econometric Theory22(2006), 1–14. Danijel Krizmani´c, Faculty of Mathematics, University of Rijeka, Radmile Matejˇci´c 2, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia Email address:dkrizmanic@math.uniri.hr
work page 2006
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.