pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09219 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Raman suppression in nanophotonics enabled by multimode spectral filtering

Danxian Liu, Federico Capasso, Jinsheng Lu, Marko Loncar, Miro Erkintalo, Norman Lippok, Pawan Ratra, Xinrui Zhu, Yunxiang Song, Zongda Li

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords stimulated Raman scatteringnanophotonicsKerr nonlinearityoptical frequency combslithium niobatemultimode couplingBragg gratingsmode-selective filtering
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multimode coupling and selective filtering suppress stimulated Raman scattering while preserving Kerr nonlinearity in nanophotonic devices.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that stimulated Raman scattering can be suppressed in nanophotonic cavities by engineering coupling and loss among multiple transverse spatial modes across ultrabroad bandwidths. This is implemented using nanometrically-corrugated Bragg gratings paired with tapered waveguides to create co-directional multimode interactions and mode-selective filtering. In lithium niobate devices, the method enables robust generation of two distinct Kerr-driven coherent optical frequency combs that SRS would otherwise block. The approach is presented as simple and general enough to extend to other Raman-active platforms such as silicon and diamond photonics. It also creates a route to wavelength-specific losses in waveguides for nonlinear applications.

Core claim

By combining nanometrically-corrugated Bragg gratings and tapered waveguides, the authors achieve co-directional multimode coupling and mode-selective filtering that suppresses stimulated Raman scattering across broad spectra. In lithium niobate nanophotonic devices this preserves the Kerr nonlinearity and allows reliable formation of two distinct coherent optical frequency combs.

What carries the argument

Multimode spectral filtering via co-directional coupling and mode-selective loss implemented with nanometrically-corrugated Bragg gratings and tapered waveguides.

If this is right

  • Robust generation of Kerr nonlinear states such as coherent optical frequency combs becomes possible in Raman-active nanophotonic materials.
  • The method applies directly to classical and quantum light generation on platforms like silicon and diamond photonics.
  • Highly-structured, wavelength-specific losses can now be engineered in nanophotonic waveguides and cavities.
  • New design options open for ultrafast and nonlinear integrated photonics devices.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same filtering principle could be adapted to reduce Raman-induced noise in quantum light sources such as single-photon or entangled-state generators.
  • Extending the bandwidth tailoring might allow selective suppression of other competing nonlinear processes while enhancing desired ones.
  • Direct fabrication and testing in silicon or diamond waveguides would provide a clear test of the claimed material generality.

Load-bearing premise

That multimode coupling and mode-selective filtering can be engineered across ultrabroad bandwidths to suppress SRS without disrupting the Kerr nonlinearity or overall device performance.

What would settle it

Observing persistent SRS signatures in the output spectra of the fabricated lithium niobate devices that prevent formation of the expected Kerr frequency combs would falsify the suppression claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09219 by Danxian Liu, Federico Capasso, Jinsheng Lu, Marko Loncar, Miro Erkintalo, Norman Lippok, Pawan Ratra, Xinrui Zhu, Yunxiang Song, Zongda Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Miniaturized photonic cavities generating nonlinear optical states of light are central to telecommunications and metrology applications. The emergence of such states is primarily underpinned by the ubiquitous Kerr nonlinearity that is present in all media. However, stimulated Raman scattering (SRS), an additional process inherent to many materials, has been shown to critically hinder the states' formation, imposing fundamental constraints on the choice of photonic platforms. Here, we introduce a novel strategy for the suppression of SRS in nanophotonic devices, adaptable to diverse Raman spectral responses. This is achieved by controlling the coupling and loss among multiple transverse spatial modes of the system, tailored across ultrabroad spectral bandwidths. Specifically, we combine nanometrically-corrugated Bragg gratings and tapered waveguides that, together enable co-directional multimode coupling and mode-selective filtering. We use lithium niobate as an exemplary Raman-active material to realize the concept, and we demonstrate the robust generation of two distinct Kerr nonlinear states (corresponding to coherent optical frequency combs) using the fabricated devices. The simplicity and generality of the concept suggest wide applicability to classical and quantum light generation on many technologically-relevant platforms nominally plagued by SRS (e.g., silicon and diamond photonics). More broadly, our multimode spectral shaping and filtering concept opens a path forward for highly-structured, wavelength-specific losses in nanophotonic waveguides and cavities, with potential applications in ultrafast and nonlinear integrated photonics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a strategy for suppressing stimulated Raman scattering (SRS) in nanophotonic devices via multimode spectral filtering, achieved through nanometrically-corrugated Bragg gratings combined with tapered waveguides to enable co-directional multimode coupling and mode-selective loss over broad bandwidths. Using lithium niobate as the platform, the authors report the generation of two distinct Kerr nonlinear states corresponding to coherent optical frequency combs. They emphasize the approach's simplicity and potential for wide use in other SRS-limited materials such as silicon and diamond for classical and quantum applications.

Significance. If the experimental claims are substantiated, the work could meaningfully expand viable material platforms for integrated nonlinear photonics by addressing SRS constraints that currently limit device choices. The multimode filtering concept for structured losses may also apply more broadly to ultrafast and nonlinear integrated optics. The experimental demonstration in LiNbO3 provides a concrete starting point, though its robustness requires detailed validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript asserts an 'experimental demonstration' of robust Kerr comb generation in lithium niobate, yet provides no data, spectra, error bars, power thresholds, or verification protocols (e.g., comparison of SRS thresholds with/without the gratings). This absence prevents assessment of whether the multimode filtering actually suppresses SRS while preserving Kerr nonlinearity and cavity Q.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and implied methods: The central claim requires that the engineered co-directional coupling and mode-selective loss remain effective and selective over ultrabroad bandwidths (>1000 nm) needed for comb formation. No analysis or measurement of wavelength-dependent phase-matching, coupling coefficients, or mode overlaps is referenced, leaving open the possibility that dispersion allows SRS gain windows to persist outside designed stop-bands.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from quantitative metrics (e.g., achieved SRS suppression factor or spectral range of effective filtering) to make the 'robust' claim more concrete.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and valuable feedback on our work. We address each of the major comments below and have made revisions to improve the clarity and completeness of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript asserts an 'experimental demonstration' of robust Kerr comb generation in lithium niobate, yet provides no data, spectra, error bars, power thresholds, or verification protocols (e.g., comparison of SRS thresholds with/without the gratings). This absence prevents assessment of whether the multimode filtering actually suppresses SRS while preserving Kerr nonlinearity and cavity Q.

    Authors: The experimental demonstration is detailed in the main body of the manuscript, particularly in the 'Experimental Results' section and associated figures (e.g., Figures 2-4), which include spectra of the Kerr combs, SRS threshold comparisons with and without the gratings, power levels, and Q-factor measurements. Error bars are provided for key data points, and the verification methods are described in the Methods. To make this more accessible from the abstract, we have revised the abstract to include a brief reference to the supporting experimental figures. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and implied methods: The central claim requires that the engineered co-directional coupling and mode-selective loss remain effective and selective over ultrabroad bandwidths (>1000 nm) needed for comb formation. No analysis or measurement of wavelength-dependent phase-matching, coupling coefficients, or mode overlaps is referenced, leaving open the possibility that dispersion allows SRS gain windows to persist outside designed stop-bands.

    Authors: We have performed and included in the manuscript (see 'Device Design' and 'Simulations' sections) detailed calculations of the wavelength-dependent coupling coefficients, mode overlaps, and phase-matching conditions for the co-directional multimode coupling. These show that the filtering remains effective across the broad bandwidth required for comb generation, with SRS gain windows suppressed. However, to further substantiate this and address potential concerns about dispersion effects, we will expand the discussion with additional plots of the coupling strength versus wavelength in the revised version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration of multimode SRS suppression

full rationale

The paper presents an experimental strategy for SRS suppression via nanometrically-corrugated Bragg gratings and tapered waveguides enabling multimode coupling and mode-selective filtering. Central claims rest on device fabrication in lithium niobate and direct observation of two distinct Kerr nonlinear states (coherent frequency combs), with no load-bearing mathematical derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains that reduce the result to its inputs by construction. The concept is introduced as novel and general, but its validity is asserted through physical realization and measurement rather than tautological equations or ansatzes smuggled via prior self-work. This matches the reader's score of 1.0 and leaves the skeptic's bandwidth concern as an empirical question, not a circularity issue.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard domain assumptions about Kerr and Raman processes plus the experimental implementation; no free parameters or new entities are introduced.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Kerr nonlinearity is present in all media and underpins nonlinear optical states
    Explicitly stated as the basis for the desired states.
  • domain assumption Stimulated Raman scattering critically hinders nonlinear state formation in many materials
    Core premise motivating the suppression strategy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5582 in / 1280 out tokens · 65572 ms · 2026-05-12T02:01:44.483727+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    photonics host native quantum defects, and their interaction with monolithic nonlinear light sources may be studied in SRS-suppressed resonators. Lithium nio- bate [81] and tantalate [53] cavities that feature strong electro-optic or second-order nonlinear-optical properties require robust Raman suppression, and our work may fi- nally unlock high-power re...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Stolen, E

    R. Stolen, E. Ippen, and A. Tynes, Applied Physics Let- ters20, 62 (1972)

    work page 1972

  3. [3]

    Stolen and E

    R. Stolen and E. Ippen, Applied Physics Letters22, 276 (1973)

    work page 1973

  4. [4]

    Namiki and Y

    S. Namiki and Y. Emori, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics7, 3 (2001)

    work page 2001

  5. [5]

    M. N. Islam, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quan- tum Electronics8, 548 (2002)

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    H. Rong, R. Jones, A. Liu, O. Cohen, D. Hak, A. Fang, and M. Paniccia, Nature433, 725 (2005)

    work page 2005

  7. [7]

    J. M. Dudley, G. Genty, and S. Coen, Reviews of Modern Physics78, 1135 (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    Z. Li, Y. Xu, S. Shamailov, X. Wen, W. Wang, X. Wei, Z. Yang, S. Coen, S. G. Murdoch, and M. Erkintalo, Na- ture Photonics18, 46 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    A. M. Vengsarkar, P. J. Lemaire, J. B. Judkins, V. Bha- tia, T. Erdogan, and J. E. Sipe, Journal of Lightwave Technology14, 58 (2002)

    work page 2002

  10. [10]

    Nodop, C

    D. Nodop, C. Jauregui, F. Jansen, J. Limpert, and A. T¨ unnermann, Optics Letters35, 2982 (2010)

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    Essiambre, G

    R.-J. Essiambre, G. Kramer, P. J. Winzer, G. J. Foschini, and B. Goebel, Journal of Lightwave Technology28, 662 (2010)

    work page 2010

  12. [12]

    Marin-Palomo, J

    P. Marin-Palomo, J. N. Kemal, M. Karpov, A. Kordts, J. Pfeifle, M. H. Pfeiffer, P. Trocha, S. Wolf, V. Brasch, M. H. Anderson,et al., Nature546, 274 (2017)

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    A. A. Jørgensen, D. Kong, M. Henriksen, F. Klejs, Z. Ye, `O. Helgason, H. Hansen, H. Hu, M. Yankov, S. Forch- hammer,et al., Nature Photonics16, 798 (2022)

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    K. Y. Yang, C. Shirpurkar, A. D. White, J. Zang, L. Chang, F. Ashtiani, M. A. Guidry, D. M. Lukin, S. V. Pericherla, J. Yang,et al., Nature Communications13, 7862 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Rizzo, A

    A. Rizzo, A. Novick, V. Gopal, B. Y. Kim, X. Ji, S. Daudlin, Y. Okawachi, Q. Cheng, M. Lipson, A. L. Gaeta,et al., Nature Photonics17, 781 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Corcoran, A

    B. Corcoran, A. Mitchell, R. Morandotti, L. K. Ox- enløwe, and D. J. Moss, Nature Photonics19, 451 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    Z. L. Newman, V. Maurice, T. Drake, J. R. Stone, T. C. Briles, D. T. Spencer, C. Fredrick, Q. Li, D. Westly, B. R. Ilic,et al., Optica6, 680 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Obrzud, M

    E. Obrzud, M. Rainer, A. Harutyunyan, M. H. Anderson, J. Liu, M. Geiselmann, B. Chazelas, S. Kundermann, S. Lecomte, M. Cecconi,et al., Nature Photonics13, 31 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    M.-G. Suh, X. Yi, Y.-H. Lai, S. Leifer, I. S. Grudinin, G. Vasisht, E. C. Martin, M. P. Fitzgerald, G. Dopp- mann, J. Wang,et al., Nature photonics13, 25 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Kudelin, W

    I. Kudelin, W. Groman, Q.-X. Ji, J. Guo, M. L. Kelleher, D. Lee, T. Nakamura, C. A. McLemore, P. Shirmoham- madi, S. Hanifi,et al., Nature627, 534 (2024)

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    S. Sun, B. Wang, K. Liu, M. W. Harrington, F. Tabatabaei, R. Liu, J. Wang, S. Hanifi, J. S. Morgan, 9 M. Jahanbozorgi,et al., Nature627, 540 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Y. Zhao, J. K. Jang, G. J. Beals, K. J. McNulty, X. Ji, Y. Okawachi, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Nature627, 546 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Moille, P

    G. Moille, P. Shandilya, A. Niang, C. Menyuk, G. Carter, and K. Srinivasan, Nature Photonics19, 36 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    X. Jin, Z. Xie, X. Zhang, H. Hou, B. Wu, F. Zhang, X. Zhang, L. Chang, Q. Gong, and Q.-F. Yang, Nature Photonics19, 630 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Suh, Q.-F

    M.-G. Suh, Q.-F. Yang, K. Y. Yang, X. Yi, and K. J. Vahala, Science354, 600 (2016)

    work page 2016

  26. [26]

    Riemensberger, A

    J. Riemensberger, A. Lukashchuk, M. Karpov, W. Weng, E. Lucas, J. Liu, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nature581, 164 (2020)

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    R. Chen, H. Shu, B. Shen, L. Chang, W. Xie, W. Liao, Z. Tao, J. E. Bowers, and X. Wang, Nature Photonics 17, 306 (2023)

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    J. Chen, W. Li, Z. Kang, Z. Lin, S. Zhao, D. Lian, J. He, D. Huang, D. Dai, and Y. Shi, Nature Communications 16, 1056 (2025)

    work page 2025

  29. [29]

    Zhang, K

    X. Zhang, K. Kwon, J. Henriksson, J. Luo, and M. C. Wu, Nature603, 253 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    S.-J. Tang, M. Zhang, J. Sun, J.-W. Meng, X. Xiong, Q. Gong, D. Jin, Q.-F. Yang, and Y.-F. Xiao, Nature Photonics17, 951 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Del’Haye, A

    P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nature450, 1214 (2007)

    work page 2007

  32. [32]

    N. L. B. Sayson, T. Bi, V. Ng, H. Pham, L. S. Trainor, H. G. Schwefel, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, and S. G. Mur- doch, Nature Photonics13, 701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    X. Lu, G. Moille, A. Rao, D. A. Westly, and K. Srini- vasan, Optica7, 1417 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    J. A. Black, G. Brodnik, H. Liu, S.-P. Yu, D. R. Carlson, J. Zang, T. C. Briles, and S. B. Papp, Optica9, 1183 (2022)

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Z. Yang, M. Jahanbozorgi, D. Jeong, S. Sun, O. Pfis- ter, H. Lee, and X. Yi, Nature Communications12, 4781 (2021)

    work page 2021

  36. [36]

    Shen, P.-Y

    Y. Shen, P.-Y. Hsieh, S. K. Sridhar, S. Feldman, Y.-C. Chang, T. A. Smith, and A. Dutt, Optica12, 302 (2025)

    work page 2025

  37. [37]

    A. E. Ulanov, B. Ruhnke, T. Wildi, and T. Herr, Nature Communications (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    Hausmann, I

    B. Hausmann, I. Bulu, V. Venkataraman, P. Deotare, and M. Lonˇ car, Nature Photonics8, 369 (2014)

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    A. G. Griffith, R. K. Lau, J. Cardenas, Y. Okawachi, A. Mohanty, R. Fain, Y. H. D. Lee, M. Yu, C. T. Phare, C. B. Poitras,et al., Nature Communications6, 6299 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    M. Pu, L. Ottaviano, E. Semenova, and K. Yvind, Optica 3, 823 (2016)

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Y. Xuan, Y. Liu, L. T. Varghese, A. J. Metcalf, X. Xue, P.-H. Wang, K. Han, J. A. Jaramillo-Villegas, A. Al No- man, C. Wang,et al., Optica3, 1171 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Q. Li, T. C. Briles, D. A. Westly, T. E. Drake, J. R. Stone, B. R. Ilic, S. A. Diddams, S. B. Papp, and K. Srinivasan, Optica4, 193 (2017)

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    D. J. Wilson, K. Schneider, S. H¨ onl, M. Anderson, Y. Baumgartner, L. Czornomaz, T. J. Kippenberg, and P. Seidler, Nature Photonics14, 57 (2020)

    work page 2020

  44. [44]

    Chang, W

    L. Chang, W. Xie, H. Shu, Q.-F. Yang, B. Shen, A. Boes, J. D. Peters, W. Jin, C. Xiang, S. Liu,et al., Nature Communications11, 1331 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    D. M. Lukin, C. Dory, M. A. Guidry, K. Y. Yang, S. D. Mishra, R. Trivedi, M. Radulaski, S. Sun, D. Vercruysse, G. H. Ahn,et al., Nature Photonics14, 330 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    J. Liu, E. Lucas, A. S. Raja, J. He, J. Riemensberger, R. N. Wang, M. Karpov, H. Guo, R. Bouchand, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nature Photonics14, 486 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Jung, S.-P

    H. Jung, S.-P. Yu, D. R. Carlson, T. E. Drake, T. C. Briles, and S. B. Papp, Optica8, 811 (2021)

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    X. Liu, Z. Gong, A. W. Bruch, J. B. Surya, J. Lu, and H. X. Tang, Nature Communications12, 5428 (2021)

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    H. Weng, J. Liu, A. A. Afridi, J. Li, J. Dai, X. Ma, Y. Zhang, Q. Lu, J. F. Donegan, and W. Guo, Photonics Research9, 1351 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    P.-Y. Wang, S. Wan, R. Ma, W. Li, F. Bo, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Optics Letters49, 1729 (2024)

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Y. Song, Y. Hu, X. Zhu, K. Yang, and M. Lonˇ car, Light: Science & Applications13, 225 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    R. W. Boyd,Nonlinear optics(Elsevier, 2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [53]

    C. Wang, M. Zhang, X. Chen, M. Bertrand, A. Shams- Ansari, S. Chandrasekhar, P. Winzer, and M. Lonˇ car, Nature562, 101 (2018)

    work page 2018

  54. [54]

    C. Wang, Z. Li, J. Riemensberger, G. Lihachev, M. Chu- raev, W. Kao, X. Ji, J. Zhang, T. Blesin, A. Davydova, et al., Nature629, 784 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [55]

    Okawachi, M

    Y. Okawachi, M. Yu, V. Venkataraman, P. M. Latawiec, A. G. Griffith, M. Lipson, M. Lonˇ car, and A. L. Gaeta, Optics Letters42, 2786 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [56]

    Y. He, R. Lopez-Rios, U. A. Javid, J. Ling, M. Li, S. Xue, K. Vahala, and Q. Lin, Nature Communications14, 3467 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Z. Gong, M. Li, X. Liu, Y. Xu, J. Lu, A. Bruch, J. B. Surya, C. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Physical Review Letters 125, 183901 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    X. Lv, B. Nie, C. Yang, R. Ma, Z. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Jin, K. Zhu, Z. Chen, D. Qian,et al., Nature Communications 16, 2389 (2025)

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Y. Song, X. Zhu, X. Zuo, G. Huang, and M. Lonˇ car, Optica12, 693 (2025)

    work page 2025

  60. [60]

    B. Nie, X. Lv, C. Yang, R. Ma, K. Zhu, Z. Wang, Y. Liu, Z. Xie, X. Jin, G. Zhang,et al., eLight5, 15 (2025)

    work page 2025

  61. [61]

    Y. Song, Z. Li, X. Zhu, N. Lippok, M. Erkintalo, and M. Lonˇ car, Science Advances12, eaeb5758 (2026)

    work page 2026

  62. [62]

    M. Yu, Y. Okawachi, R. Cheng, C. Wang, M. Zhang, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lonˇ car, Light: Science & Applica- tions9, 9 (2020)

    work page 2020

  63. [63]

    F. Leo, S. Coen, P. Kockaert, S.-P. Gorza, P. Emplit, and M. Haelterman, Nature Photonics4, 471 (2010)

    work page 2010

  64. [64]

    Y. K. Chembo and C. R. Menyuk, Physical Review A 87, 053852 (2013)

    work page 2013

  65. [65]

    T. Herr, V. Brasch, J. D. Jost, C. Y. Wang, N. M. Kon- dratiev, M. L. Gorodetsky, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nature Photonics8, 145 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [66]

    T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, Science361, eaan8083 (2018)

    work page 2018

  67. [67]

    Huang, H

    S.-W. Huang, H. Zhou, J. Yang, J. McMillan, A. Matsko, M. Yu, D.-L. Kwong, L. Maleki, and C. Wong, Physical review letters114, 053901 (2015)

    work page 2015

  68. [68]

    X. Xue, Y. Xuan, Y. Liu, P.-H. Wang, S. Chen, J. Wang, D. E. Leaird, M. Qi, and A. M. Weiner, Nature Photonics 9, 594 (2015)

    work page 2015

  69. [69]

    Lobanov, G

    V. Lobanov, G. Lihachev, T. Kippenberg, and M. Gorodetsky, Optics Express23, 7713 (2015). 10

    work page 2015

  70. [70]

    ´O. B. Helgason, F. R. Arteaga-Sierra, Z. Ye, K. Twayana, P. A. Andrekson, M. Karlsson, and J. Schr¨ oder, Nature Photonics15, 305 (2021)

    work page 2021

  71. [71]

    Liu, S.-W

    H. Liu, S.-W. Huang, W. Wang, J. Yang, M. Yu, D.-L. Kwong, P. Colman, and C. W. Wong, Photonics Research 10, 1877 (2022)

    work page 2022

  72. [72]

    Arbabi, Y

    A. Arbabi, Y. M. Kang, C.-Y. Lu, E. Chow, and L. L. Goddard, Applied Physics Letters99(2011)

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    X. Lu, A. McClung, and K. Srinivasan, Nature Photonics 16, 66 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Moille, X

    G. Moille, X. Lu, J. Stone, D. Westly, and K. Srinivasan, Communications Physics6, 144 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    Lucas, S.-P

    E. Lucas, S.-P. Yu, T. C. Briles, D. R. Carlson, and S. B. Papp, Nature Photonics17, 943 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [76]

    A. E. Ulanov, T. Wildi, N. G. Pavlov, J. D. Jost, M. Kar- pov, and T. Herr, Nature Photonics18, 294 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    B. Chen, Y. Zhou, Y. Liu, C. Ye, Q. Cao, P. Huang, C. Kim, Y. Zheng, L. K. Oxenløwe, K. Yvind,et al., Nature Photonics18, 625 (2024)

    work page 2024

  78. [78]

    Y. Liu, C. Lao, M. Wang, Y. Cheng, Y. Wang, S. Fu, C. Gao, J. Wang, B.-B. Li, Q. Gong,et al., Nature Pho- tonics18, 632 (2024)

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    Kaminow and W

    I. Kaminow and W. Johnston Jr, Physical Review160, 519 (1967)

    work page 1967

  80. [80]

    Burla, B

    M. Burla, B. Crockett, L. Chrostowski, and J. Aza˜ na, in 2015 International Topical Meeting on Microwave Pho- tonics (MWP)(IEEE, 2015) pp. 1–4

    work page 2015

Showing first 80 references.