pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09255 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-10 · 🧬 q-bio.PE · cond-mat.stat-mech

Recognition: no theorem link

Dual Fear Mechanisms Shaping Stochastic Population Dynamics under the Allee Effect

Mirza Muradli, \"Ozg\"ur G\"ultekin

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords Allee effectfear effectsstochastic population dynamicssteady-state probability distributionFokker-Planck equationnoise-induced transitionspredator-prey interactionsmean first-passage time
0
0 comments X

The pith

Fear acts through two channels in a cubic Allee model to produce competing low- and high-density states under stochastic noise.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a single-species population model with the Allee effect in which predator-induced fear operates simultaneously as a multiplicative suppressor of the intrinsic growth rate and as a rescaler of the Holling type III saturation term. Stochastic dynamics are introduced via a Langevin equation with correlated additive and multiplicative noise, and the steady-state probability distribution is obtained in closed form from the associated Fokker-Planck equation. Analysis of this distribution shows noise-induced transitions together with fear-controlled regime shifts between low- and high-density states, accompanied by structural competition and non-monotonic dependence on fear intensity. These results supply an analytical account of apparently contradictory empirical reports on fear-mediated population responses and indicate direct relevance for conservation and ecosystem management decisions.

Core claim

Fear enters the cubic Allee model through two distinct functional channels: a multiplicative reduction of the intrinsic growth rate and an integrated rescaling of the Holling type III saturation structure. When the resulting deterministic skeleton is extended to a Langevin equation containing correlated Gaussian noises, the Fokker-Planck equation yields an explicit steady-state probability distribution whose shape undergoes both noise-induced transitions and fear-driven regime changes between low- and high-density states, with the two-channel fear effect generating structural competition and non-monotonic shifts in the distribution.

What carries the argument

The two-channel fear mechanism embedded in a cubic Allee growth law, converted to a Langevin equation with correlated additive-multiplicative noise whose Fokker-Planck equation furnishes the analytically solvable steady-state probability distribution.

If this is right

  • The steady-state distribution exhibits non-monotonic dependence on the fear intensity parameter.
  • Fear level can be used as an independent control variable to induce or suppress transitions between low- and high-density regimes.
  • Escape times between density states, computed via mean first-passage time, are jointly shaped by noise intensity and the two fear channels.
  • Normalized moments and Fisher information of the distribution quantify the sensitivity of population statistics to each fear channel.
  • The model accounts for conflicting field observations by showing that the net effect of fear can be either stabilizing or destabilizing depending on the relative strength of the two channels.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same two-channel formulation could be inserted into other density-dependent growth laws to test whether structural competition between states appears outside the cubic Allee case.
  • Field protocols that separately manipulate perceived risk and actual predation rates could directly measure the two functional channels and thereby test the model's decomposition of fear effects.
  • Because the distribution is available in closed form, conservation planners could use it to compute optimal intervention thresholds that minimize extinction risk under measured fear levels.

Load-bearing premise

That predator fear can be represented accurately by a multiplicative suppression of the growth rate plus a rescaling of the Holling type III term inside a cubic Allee model, and that these two modifications together produce the observed structural competition in the probability distribution.

What would settle it

Empirical measurement of the steady-state population density histogram in a replicated mesocosm experiment in which perceived predation risk is varied independently while holding direct predation constant; the histogram should exhibit the predicted non-monotonic structural competition and regime shifts as fear intensity increases.

read the original abstract

Traditional population models that include predator-prey interactions attribute demographic changes directly to predation-related effects. However, predator-induced fear in prey has increasingly been recognised as an important factor shaping population dynamics. In this study, we propose a cubic population model in which fear acts through two distinct functional channels for a single-species population exhibiting the Allee effect. In this model, fear reduces the intrinsic growth rate through a multiplicative suppression mechanism while also playing an integrated role in modulating the growth and interaction dynamics by rescaling the saturation structure of the Holling type III interaction term. The stochastic extension of the model is described by a Langevin formalism containing correlated additive and multiplicative Gaussian noise, and the steady state probability distribution (SSPD) is analytically obtained using the corresponding Fokker-Planck equation. The analytical solution is validated by numerical simulations. The SSPD reveals both noise-induced transitions and fear-controlled regime changes between low- and high-density states, with the two-channel effect of fear producing structural competition and non-monotonic changes in the distribution. These are analysed through phenomenological bifurcation (P-bifurcation) diagrams and three-dimensional distribution surfaces. Additionally, statistical properties, parameter sensitivity, and escape dynamics are investigated through normalised moments, Fisher information, and mean first-passage time (MFPT) calculations. Notably, our model treats fear as an independent control parameter and provides a natural explanation for several conflicting empirical findings in the literature on fear-mediated population dynamics, while also offering an analytical basis for conservation biology and ecosystem management.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a cubic population model with the Allee effect in which fear operates through two independent channels: a multiplicative suppression factor on the intrinsic growth rate and a rescaling of the Holling type III saturation term. The stochastic extension employs a Langevin equation with correlated additive-multiplicative Gaussian noise; the corresponding Fokker-Planck equation is solved to obtain a closed-form steady-state probability distribution (SSPD). This SSPD is validated against direct numerical simulations and is used to demonstrate noise-induced transitions, fear-controlled regime shifts between low- and high-density states, non-monotonic structural changes, P-bifurcations, normalized moments, Fisher information, and mean first-passage times.

Significance. If the central derivation holds, the work supplies an analytically tractable stochastic framework that isolates the competing effects of two fear channels on Allee dynamics. The explicit SSPD, direct simulation validation, and quantitative treatment of escape times constitute clear strengths that enable precise characterization of regime changes and offer a mechanistic basis for reconciling conflicting empirical reports on fear-mediated population responses. The approach is directly relevant to conservation modeling.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (12)] §3.2, Eq. (12): the effective potential obtained after integrating the Fokker-Planck drift and diffusion terms must be shown explicitly to confirm that the two fear modifications (multiplicative suppression and Holling rescaling) do not cancel or reduce to a single effective parameter; otherwise the claimed structural competition in the SSPD is not independently attributable to the dual-channel construction.
  2. [§4.3, Figure 5] §4.3, Figure 5: the reported non-monotonic dependence of the low-density peak height on the fear suppression factor is load-bearing for the central claim of regime changes; the figure should include a direct comparison against the single-channel (growth-suppression only) case to demonstrate that the second channel produces a qualitatively distinct bifurcation structure rather than a quantitative shift.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] The notation for the noise correlation coefficient and the rescaling parameter should be introduced with a single consistent symbol set in §2 to avoid confusion when they appear together in the diffusion term of the Fokker-Planck operator.
  2. [Table 1] Table 1 (parameter ranges) lists biologically plausible intervals but lacks citations to empirical studies on fear-induced growth suppression magnitudes; adding one or two references would strengthen the justification for the chosen intervals.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and constructive comments on our manuscript. The suggestions will improve the clarity regarding the independence of the dual fear channels and the distinct effects on regime shifts. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the revisions in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (12)] §3.2, Eq. (12): the effective potential obtained after integrating the Fokker-Planck drift and diffusion terms must be shown explicitly to confirm that the two fear modifications (multiplicative suppression and Holling rescaling) do not cancel or reduce to a single effective parameter; otherwise the claimed structural competition in the SSPD is not independently attributable to the dual-channel construction.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly displaying the effective potential is necessary to substantiate the independence of the two fear channels. In the revised manuscript, we will derive and present the explicit form of the effective potential V(x) = −∫[A(x)/B(x)] dx, where A(x) and B(x) are the drift and diffusion coefficients of the Fokker-Planck equation. The resulting expression will show that the multiplicative suppression modifies the linear growth term while the Holling rescaling alters the cubic saturation term in a non-commuting manner, so that the potential cannot be reduced to a single effective fear parameter. This will be accompanied by analytical forms and numerical plots of V(x) for different fear strengths to confirm the structural competition in the SSPD. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.3, Figure 5] §4.3, Figure 5: the reported non-monotonic dependence of the low-density peak height on the fear suppression factor is load-bearing for the central claim of regime changes; the figure should include a direct comparison against the single-channel (growth-suppression only) case to demonstrate that the second channel produces a qualitatively distinct bifurcation structure rather than a quantitative shift.

    Authors: We appreciate this recommendation to strengthen the demonstration of the second channel's distinct role. In the revised manuscript, we will augment Figure 5 with a direct comparison to the single-channel model (growth-rate suppression only, omitting the Holling rescaling). This will be shown via an additional curve or inset panel plotting the low-density peak height versus the fear parameter under identical conditions. The comparison will highlight that the dual-channel model produces a qualitatively different non-monotonic profile and shifted P-bifurcation points, arising from the interplay of the two mechanisms rather than a mere rescaling of the single-channel dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained; no circular reductions identified

full rationale

The paper constructs a phenomenological cubic Allee model with two explicit fear channels (multiplicative growth suppression and rescaled Holling-III term), writes the corresponding Langevin equation with correlated additive-multiplicative noise, obtains the Fokker-Planck operator, and derives a closed-form steady-state probability distribution by direct integration of the FP equation. All subsequent results (P-bifurcation diagrams, moments, MFPT, numerical validation) follow from this explicit analytic expression and parameter sweeps; fear parameters remain independent controls rather than fitted quantities, and no step reduces a claimed prediction to an input by construction or via self-citation chains. The derivation is therefore mathematically self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model introduces multiple free parameters for fear and noise effects. It relies on standard mathematical axioms for stochastic differential equations but postulates new biological mechanisms for fear without independent evidence beyond the model's construction.

free parameters (4)
  • Fear suppression factor
    Multiplicative parameter reducing intrinsic growth rate
  • Holling rescaling parameter
    Parameter modulating the saturation structure
  • Noise intensities
    Strengths of additive and multiplicative noises
  • Noise correlation coefficient
    Degree of correlation between noises
axioms (2)
  • standard math The stochastic dynamics follow a Langevin equation with correlated Gaussian noises
    Standard approach in stochastic modeling
  • domain assumption The population growth follows a cubic form incorporating Allee effect and modified by fear
    Core model assumption proposed in the paper
invented entities (1)
  • Dual fear mechanisms no independent evidence
    purpose: To capture two distinct ways fear affects population dynamics
    Newly proposed functional forms without external empirical validation in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5578 in / 1760 out tokens · 79965 ms · 2026-05-12T02:09:48.278416+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    An Introduction , 3rd edn

    Murray, J.D.: Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 3rd edn. Springer, New York, NY (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/b98868

    work page doi:10.1007/b98868 2002

  2. [2]

    CRC Press, Bo ca Raton (2018)

    Strogatz, S.H.: Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Appl ications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Bo ca Raton (2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429492563

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429492563 2018

  3. [3]

    Communications Physics 9, 4 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02434-1

    Roy, S., Byrne, H.M., Banerjee, J., Sasmal, S.K., Dutta, S., Ghosh, D.: Spatio-temporal eco-evolutionary dynamics of prey-pr edator systems with defended and undefended prey. Communications Physics 9, 4 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-025-02434-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-025-02434-1 2025

  4. [4]

    McKane, A.J., Newman, T.J.: Predator-prey cycles from r esonant ampli- fication of demographic stochasticity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 218102 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.218102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.218102 2005

  5. [5]

    : Stochastic population dynamics in spatially extended predator–prey s ystems

    Dobramysl, U., Mobilia, M., Pleimling, M., Täuber, U.C. : Stochastic population dynamics in spatially extended predator–prey s ystems. Jour- nal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 51(6), 063001 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8121/aa95c7

    work page doi:10.1088/1751-8121/aa95c7 2018

  6. [6]

    Science 290, 1358 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5495.1358

    Fussmann, G.F., Ellner, S.P., Shertzer, K.W., Hairston , N.G.J.: Crossing the hopf bifurcation in a live predator-prey system. Science 290, 1358 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5495.1358

    work page doi:10.1126/science.290.5495.1358 2000

  7. [7]

    : Evolutionarily stable strategies in stable and periodically fluctuating populati ons: The rosenzweig– macarthur predator–prey model

    Grunert, K., Holden, H., Jakobsen, E.R., Stenseth, N.C. : Evolutionarily stable strategies in stable and periodically fluctuating populati ons: The rosenzweig– macarthur predator–prey model. Proceedings of the Nationa l Academy of Sciences 118 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2017463118

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2017463118 2021

  8. [8]

    European Physical Journal B 98, 201 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-01050-w

    Roy, S., Mondal, B., Ghosh, S., Tiwari, P.K.: Ecological sensitivities to 31 the interplay of allee effects, prey refuge and supplementar y food resources in a predator-prey system. European Physical Journal B 98, 201 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-01050-w

    work page doi:10.1140/epjb/s10051-025-01050-w 2025

  9. [9]

    , Djilali, S., Zeb, A., Khan, I., Eldin, S.M.: Influence of allee effect on the spatiot emporal behavior of a diffusive predator-prey model with crowley–martin type response function

    Guin, L.N., Pal, P.J., Alzahrani, J., Ali, N., Sarkar, K. , Djilali, S., Zeb, A., Khan, I., Eldin, S.M.: Influence of allee effect on the spatiot emporal behavior of a diffusive predator-prey model with crowley–martin type response function. Scientific Reports 13, 4710 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28419-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28419-0 2023

  10. [10]

    Moradi, S., Anderson, J., Gürcan, O.D.: Predator-prey model for the self- organization of stochastic oscillators in dual population s. Phys. Rev. E 92, 062930 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.062930

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.92.062930 2015

  11. [11]

    Journal of Ornithology 152, 251 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0638-1

    Cresswell, W.: Predation in bird populations. Journal of Ornithology 152, 251 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-010-0638-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10336-010-0638-1 2011

  12. [12]

    Behavioral Ecology 25, 509 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru017

    Hua, F., Sieving, K.E., Fletcher, R.J., Wright, C.A.: I ncreased per- ception of predation risk to adults and offspring alters avia n repro- ductive strategy and performance. Behavioral Ecology 25, 509 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru017

    work page doi:10.1093/beheco/aru017 2014

  13. [13]

    Science 334, 1353 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216109

    Martin, T.E.: The cost of fear. Science 334, 1353 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1216109

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1216109 2011

  14. [14]

    Lima, S.L.: Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator -prey interactions: What are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-makin g? BioScience 48, 25 (1998) https://doi.org/10.2307/1313225

    work page doi:10.2307/1313225 1998

  15. [15]

    PLoS ONE 3, 2465 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002465

    Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I.: The many faces of fear: C omparing the pathways and impacts of nonconsumptive predator effects on prey popul ations. PLoS ONE 3, 2465 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002465

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002465 2008

  16. [16]

    In: Advances in the Study of Behavior, pp

    Lima, S.L.: Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: Recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ec ological per- spectives. In: Advances in the Study of Behavior, pp. 215–29 0 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60366-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0065-3454(08)60366-6 1998

  17. [17]

    Journa l of Animal Ecology 89(6), 1302–1316 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13213

    Sheriff, M.J., Peacor, S.D., Hawlena, D., Thaker, M.: No n-consumptive predator effects on prey population size: A dearth of evidence. Journa l of Animal Ecology 89(6), 1302–1316 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13213

    work page doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13213 2020

  18. [18]

    Ec ology 86, 501 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0719 32

    Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I., Benard, M.F.: Scared to death? the effects of intim- idation and consumption in predator-prey interactions. Ec ology 86, 501 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0719 32

    work page doi:10.1890/04-0719 2005

  19. [19]

    Ecoscience 5, 361 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1998.11682468

    Kats, L.B., Dill, L.M.: The scent of death: Chemosensor y assess- ment of predation risk by prey animals. Ecoscience 5, 361 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1080/11956860.1998.11682468

    work page doi:10.1080/11956860.1998.11682468 1998

  20. [20]

    S cience 334, 1398 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210908

    Zanette, L.Y., White, A.F., Allen, M.C., Clinchy, M.: P erceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year. S cience 334, 1398 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1210908

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1210908 2011

  21. [21]

    Ecology 78, 1388 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1388:BMTCEO]2.0.CO;2

    Schmitz, O.J., Beckerman, A.P., O’Brien, K.M.: Behavi orally mediated trophic cascades: Effects of predation risk on food web interactions . Ecology 78, 1388 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1388:BMTCEO]2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078 1997

  22. [22]

    Ecology 85, 1853 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1890/03-3109

    Nelson, E.H., Matthews, C.E., Rosenheim, J.A.: Predat ors reduce prey popu- lation growth by inducing changes in prey behavior. Ecology 85, 1853 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1890/03-3109

    work page doi:10.1890/03-3109 2004

  23. [23]

    Ecology Letters 7, 999 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00661.x

    Brown, J.S., Kotler, B.P.: Hazardous duty pay and the fo r- aging cost of predation. Ecology Letters 7, 999 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00661.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00661.x 2004

  24. [24]

    Functional Ecology 27, 56 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12007

    Clinchy, M., Sheriff, M.J., Zanette, L.Y.: Predator-in duced stress and the ecology of fear. Functional Ecology 27, 56 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12007

    work page doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12007 2013

  25. [25]

    : Experimental evidence for within- and cross-seasonal effects of fear on survival and re production

    Elliott, K.H., Betini, G.S., Dworkin, I., Norris, D.R. : Experimental evidence for within- and cross-seasonal effects of fear on survival and re production. Journal of Animal Ecology 85, 507 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12487

    work page doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12487 2016

  26. [26]

    Proc eedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, 1 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112404119

    Allen, M.C., Clinchy, M., Zanette, L.Y.: Fear of predat ors in free-living wildlife reduces population growth over generations. Proc eedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119, 1 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2112404119

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2112404119 2022

  27. [27]

    Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, a nd Systematics 35, 651 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021004.112426

    Benard, M.F.: Predator-induced phenotypic plasticit y in organisms with com- plex life histories. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, a nd Systematics 35, 651 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021004.112426

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.35.021004.112426 2004

  28. [28]

    A.: The many faces of fear: A synthesis of the methodological variation i n character- izing predation risk

    Moll, R.J., Redilla, K.M., Mudumba, T., Muneza, A.B., G ray, S.M., Abade, L., Hayward, M.W., Millspaugh, J.J., Montgomery, R. A.: The many faces of fear: A synthesis of the methodological variation i n character- izing predation risk. Journal of Animal Ecology 86(4), 749–765 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12680 33

    work page doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12680 2017

  29. [29]

    Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-092

    Lima, S.L., Dill, L.M.: Behavioral decisions made unde r the risk of preda- tion: A review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68, 619 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1139/z90-092

    work page doi:10.1139/z90-092 1990

  30. [30]

    Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 1691 (2005) https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1691:HSBEBA]2.0.CO;2

    Mao, J.S., Boyce, M.S., Smith, D.W., Singer, F.J., Vale s, D.J., Vore, J.M., Merrill, E.H.: Habitat selection by elk before and after wol f reintroduction in yellowstone national park. Journal of Wildlife Management 69, 1691 (2005) https://doi.org/10.2193/0022-541X(2005)69[1691:HSBEBA]2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69 2005

  31. [31]

    Animal Be haviour 69, 1181 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.022

    Creel, S., Winnie, J.A.: Responses of elk herd size to fin e-scale spatial and tem- poral variation in the risk of predation by wolves. Animal Be haviour 69, 1181 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.07.022 2005

  32. [32]

    Ecological Applications 16, 285 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0623

    Gude, J.A., Garrott, R.A., Borkowski, J.J., King, F.: P rey risk allo- cation in a grazing ecosystem. Ecological Applications 16, 285 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0623

    work page doi:10.1890/04-0623 2006

  33. [33]

    Courchamp, F., Berec, L., Gascoigne, J.: Allee Effects i n Ecology and Conservation vol. 11. Oxford University Press, Oxford ( 2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570301.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570301.001.0001 2008

  34. [34]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0878

    Elliott, K.H., Betini, G.S., Norris, D.R.: Fear create s an allee effect: Experi- mental evidence from seasonal populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 284 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2017.0878

    work page doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0878 2017

  35. [35]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 541, 123359 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123359

    Roy, J., Alam, S.: Fear factor in a prey-predator system in deterministic and stochastic environment. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications 541, 123359 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123359

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2019.123359 2020

  36. [36]

    Ecological Complexity 42, 100826 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100826

    Sarkar, K., Khajanchi, S.: Impact of fear effect on the gr owth of prey in a predator-prey interaction model. Ecological Complexity 42, 100826 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100826

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2020.100826 2020

  37. [37]

    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 62, 93 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-019-01275-w

    Halder, S., Bhattacharyya, J., Pal, S.: Comparative st udies on a predator- prey model subjected to fear and allee effect with type i and ty pe ii foraging. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 62, 93 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-019-01275-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s12190-019-01275-w 2020

  38. [38]

    European Physical Journal Plus 137, 704 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02926-x

    Kim, S., Antwi-Fordjour, K.: Prey group defense to pred ator aggre- gated induced fear. European Physical Journal Plus 137, 704 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02926-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02926-x 2022

  39. [39]

    Scientific Reports 13, 1234 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28409-2

    Sk, N., Pal, S.: Schooling behavior driven complexitie s in a fear- induced prey-predator system with harvesting under determ inistic 34 and stochastic environments. Scientific Reports 13, 1234 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-28409-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28409-2 2023

  40. [40]

    Physical Review E 109, 024224 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.024224

    Biswas, S., Mandal, A., Pal, S.: Catastrophic and nonca tastrophic popu- lation crashes in a bitrophic system with dynamic additiona l food pro- vision to cooperative predators. Physical Review E 109, 024224 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.024224

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.024224 2024

  41. [41]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applicatio ns 572, 125840 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.125840

    Bentout, S., Djilali, S., Kumar, S.: Mathematical anal ysis of the influence of prey escaping from prey herd on three species fractional predato r-prey interaction model. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applicatio ns 572, 125840 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2021.125840

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2021.125840 2021

  42. [42]

    Nonlinear Dynamics 113, 18879 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11063-w

    Ch-Chaoui, M., Mokni, K.: A multi-parameter bifurcati on analy- sis of a prey-predator model incorporating the prey allee eff ect and predator-induced fear. Nonlinear Dynamics 113, 18879 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11071-025-11063-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s11071-025-11063-w 2025

  43. [43]

    Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 206, 117964 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2026.117964

    Yan, B., Yang, M., Xiang, C.: Dynamic analysis of a preda tor-prey model with anti-predator behavior and fear effect under a two -thresholds feedback control. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 206, 117964 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2026.117964

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2026.117964 2026

  44. [44]

    Journal of Mathematical Biology 73, 1179 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-0989-1

    Wang, X., Zanette, L., Zou, X.: Modelling the fear effect in predator- prey interactions. Journal of Mathematical Biology 73, 1179 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-0989-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00285-016-0989-1 2016

  45. [45]

    Applied Mathe- matical Modelling 64, 1 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.021

    Sasmal, S.K.: Population dynamics with multiple allee effects induced by fear factors–a mathematical study on prey-predator interactio ns. Applied Mathe- matical Modelling 64, 1 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.021

    work page doi:10.1016/j.apm.2018.07.021 2018

  46. [46]

    European Physical Journal Plus 138 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04614-w

    Pal, S., Gupta, A., Misra, A.K., Dubey, B.: Complex dyna mics of a predator-prey system with fear and memory in the presence o f two discrete delays. European Physical Journal Plus 138 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04614-w

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-04614-w 2023

  47. [47]

    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71, 8851 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-025-02597-8

    Parida, K., Sarangi, B.P., Chand, S.: Impact of fear and anti-predator behavior on stability and chaos in multi-delayed predator- prey sys- tem. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71, 8851 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-025-02597-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s12190-025-02597-8 2025

  48. [48]

    Chaos 29 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5111121 35

    Wang, J., Cai, Y., Fu, S., Wang, W.: The effect of the fear f actor on the dynam- ics of a predator-prey model incorporating the prey refuge. Chaos 29 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5111121 35

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5111121 2019

  49. [49]

    Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems 33, 1123 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12591-023-00663-w

    Umrao, A.K., Srivastava, P.K.: Bifurcation analysis o f a predator-prey model with allee effect and fear effect in prey and hunting coop eration in predator. Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems 33, 1123 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12591-023-00663-w

    work page doi:10.1007/s12591-023-00663-w 2025

  50. [50]

    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71, 3939 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-024-02346-3

    Roy, S., Khajanchi, S., Tiwari, P.K.: Fear and its carry -over effects in a generalist predator-prey system featuring cooperativ e hunting. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71, 3939 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-024-02346-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s12190-024-02346-3 2025

  51. [51]

    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 72 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-026-02795-y

    Li, Z., Zhang, D., Li, Z., Zhou, W.: Fear and its carry-ov er effects in a two-prey-one-predator system featuring switching beh aviour in pre- dation. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 72 (2026) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-026-02795-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s12190-026-02795-y 2026

  52. [52]

    International Journal of Dynamics and Control 11, 2720 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01193-7

    Takyi, E.M., Antwi-Fordjour, K.: Counter-attack in a s tage- structured model with adult predator-induced fear and comp etition. International Journal of Dynamics and Control 11, 2720 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40435-023-01193-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s40435-023-01193-7 2023

  53. [53]

    Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 48, 9819 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.10845

    Reshma, K.P., Kumar, A.: Global dynamics of a stage stru cture prey-predator model with fear, group defense, and antipred ator behav- ior. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences 48, 9819 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1002/mma.10845

    work page doi:10.1002/mma.10845 2025

  54. [54]

    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71, 5867 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-025-02451-x

    Nguyen, T.P., Do, T.D., Nguyen, H.T.T.: Dynamical anal ysis of a stage- structured food-chain model under fear effect and anti-pred ator behav- ior. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71, 5867 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-025-02451-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s12190-025-02451-x 2025

  55. [55]

    Eur opean Physical Journal Plus 139 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05324-7

    Antwi-Fordjour, K., Westmoreland, S.P., Bearden, K.H .: Dual fear phenomenon in an eco-epidemiological model with prey aggregation. Eur opean Physical Journal Plus 139 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05324-7

    work page doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05324-7 2024

  56. [56]

    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71, 4227 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-025-02394-3

    Wang, C., Yang, W.: Impact of nonlocal fear effect and mut ual interference between predators in a diffusive predator-pre y model. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing 71, 4227 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1007/s12190-025-02394-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s12190-025-02394-3 2025

  57. [57]

    Fluctuation and No ise Letters 20(3), 2150023 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477521500231

    Gültekin, Ö., Eskin, Ç., Yazıcıoğlu, E.: Deterministi c and stochastic research of cubic population model with harvesting. Fluctuation and No ise Letters 20(3), 2150023 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219477521500231

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219477521500231 2021

  58. [58]

    Physica A: Statist ical Mechanics and its Applications 611, 128469 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128469

    Mandal, S.K., Poria, S.: A study of michaelis–menten ty pe harvesting effects on 36 a population in stochastic environment. Physica A: Statist ical Mechanics and its Applications 611, 128469 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128469

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.128469 2023

  59. [59]

    European Physical Journal E 35, 11 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2012-12011-4

    Ghosh, S., Banerjee, S., Bose, I.: Emergent bistabilit y: Effects of addi- tive and multiplicative noise. European Physical Journal E 35, 11 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2012-12011-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epje/i2012-12011-4 2012

  60. [60]

    Communications in Theoretical Physics 71(1), 107–116 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/71/1/107

    Yang, Y.C., Li, D.X.: Impact of colored noise on populat ion model with allee effect. Communications in Theoretical Physics 71(1), 107–116 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1088/0253-6102/71/1/107

    work page doi:10.1088/0253-6102/71/1/107 2019

  61. [61]

    Physical Review E 50, 2496 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.2496

    Da-Jin, W., Li, C., Sheng-Zhi, K.: Bistable kinetic mod el driven by cor- related noises: Steady-state analysis. Physical Review E 50, 2496 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.50.2496

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.50.2496 1994

  62. [62]

    Springer, Berlin, Heidelber g (2004)

    Gardiner, C.W.: Handbook of Stochastic Methods for Phy sics, Chemistry, and the Natural Sciences, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin, Heidelber g (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [63]

    Risken, H.: The Fokker–Planck Equation vol. 18. Spring er, Berlin, Heidelberg (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-61544-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61544-3 1996

  64. [64]

    Camb ridge University Press, Cambridge (2010)

    Jacobs, K.: Stochastic Processes for Physicists. Camb ridge University Press, Cambridge (2010). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815980

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815980 2010

  65. [65]

    Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg ( 1992)

    Kloeden, P.E., Platen, E.: Numerical Solution of Stoch as- tic Differential Equations. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg ( 1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-12616-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-12616-5 1992

  66. [66]

    In: Dynamical Sy stems, pp

    Arnold, L.: Random dynamical systems. In: Dynamical Sy stems, pp. 1–43 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0095238

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0095238 1995

  67. [67]

    Horsthemke, W., Lefever, R.: Noise-Induced Transitio ns vol. 15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-16489-8_36

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-16489-8_36 2006

  68. [68]

    Springer, London (2006)

    Berglund, N., Gentz, B.: Noise-Induced Phenomena in Sl ow-Fast Dynamical Systems. Springer, London (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-186-5

    work page doi:10.1007/1-84628-186-5 2006

  69. [69]

    Physica Scripta 95, 075215 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab93a8

    Xu, C.: Effects of colored noises on the statistical prop erties of a popu- lation growth model with allee effect. Physica Scripta 95, 075215 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ab93a8

    work page doi:10.1088/1402-4896/ab93a8 2020

  70. [70]

    Mathe matical Pro- ceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 22, 700 (1925) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100009580 37

    Fisher, R.A.: Theory of statistical estimation. Mathe matical Pro- ceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 22, 700 (1925) https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100009580 37

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100009580 1925

  71. [71]

    Cover and Joy A

    Cover, T.M., Thomas, J.A.: Elements of Information The ory, 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/047174882X

    work page doi:10.1002/047174882x 2005

  72. [72]

    Cambri dge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Redner, S.: A Guide to First-Passage Processes. Cambri dge University Press, Cambridge (2001). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606014

    work page doi:10.1017/cbo9780511606014 2001

  73. [73]

    Physica 7, 284 (1940) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(40)90098-2 38

    Kramers, H.A.: Brownian motion in a field of force and the diffusion model of chemical reactions. Physica 7, 284 (1940) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(40)90098-2 38

    work page doi:10.1016/s0031-8914(40)90098-2 1940