pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09532 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-10 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph· physics.optics

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Single-atom trapping in the evanescent field of an integrated photonic resonator

Yair Margalit , Omri Davidson , Oded Zemer , Yoad Michael , Orel Bechler , Dror Liran , Noam Gross , Doron Azoury
show 11 more authors
Jeremy Raskop Yaakov Yudkin Gabriel Guendelman Moshe Katzman Michael Nagli Yair Antman Nadav Kandel Geva Arwas Idit Peer Ofer Firstenberg Barak Dayan
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-phphysics.optics
keywords single-atom trappingevanescent fieldmicroring resonatorsilicon nitriderubidium atomSisyphus coolingphoton antibunchingcooperativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A single rubidium atom is trapped in the evanescent field of a silicon-nitride microring resonator at 150-200 nm, achieving cooperativity exceeding one.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a single ultracold rubidium atom can be efficiently trapped within the evanescent field of an integrated silicon-nitride microring resonator at distances of 150-200 nm from the chip surface. This trapping is accomplished through a single-stroke loading process based on an evanescent-field Sisyphus cooling mechanism, where a single scattering event dissipates the atom's kinetic energy into a near-surface trap. Trapping durations exhibit logarithmic scaling from sub-millisecond to up to one second without continuous cooling. The trapped atom couples efficiently to the resonator modes, enabling on-chip photon collection, photon antibunching, and Purcell-enhanced spontaneous emission with single-atom cooperativity greater than unity. This demonstrates a scalable approach for atom-photon interfaces on CMOS-compatible photonic chips.

Core claim

A single ultracold rubidium atom is trapped in the evanescent field of an integrated silicon-nitride microring resonator at 150-200 nm from the chip surface using a single-stroke evanescent-field Sisyphus cooling mechanism. The atom couples to the resonator with cooperativity exceeding unity, resulting in observable photon antibunching and Purcell enhancement without continuous cooling.

What carries the argument

The single-stroke evanescent-field Sisyphus cooling mechanism, in which a single scattering event dissipates kinetic energy to transfer the atom into a near-surface trap.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The chip-integrated resonator could be combined with additional photonic components to form larger scalable quantum networks.
  • Logarithmic trapping-time scaling suggests the mechanism may extend to longer durations or arrays of atoms for multi-qubit experiments.
  • The approach may generalize to other atomic species or resonator geometries on similar CMOS platforms.

Load-bearing premise

The observed signals arise from a single atom stably trapped via the Sisyphus mechanism without undetected multi-atom events or surface-induced decoherence.

What would settle it

A photon correlation measurement yielding g(2)(0) above 0.5 or a spontaneous emission rate inconsistent with cooperativity greater than one would falsify the single-atom strong-coupling claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09532 by Barak Dayan, Doron Azoury, Dror Liran, Gabriel Guendelman, Geva Arwas, Idit Peer, Jeremy Raskop, Michael Nagli, Moshe Katzman, Nadav Kandel, Noam Gross, Oded Zemer, Ofer Firstenberg, Omri Davidson, Orel Bechler, Yaakov Yudkin, Yair Antman, Yair Margalit, Yoad Michael.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: b shows the probability P(N) to detect N photons within the first 500 µs of the excitation pulse. Conditioned on a trapped atom (N ≥ 2), the photon￾number distribution exhibits an approximately exponen￾tial decay. We attribute these non-Poissonian statistics to variations in the initial trapping conditions established during the SSL process: as atoms can be loaded at differ￾ent energies in the trapping pot… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strong atom-photon interactions on scalable photonic platforms hold significant potential for both atomic and photonic quantum information platforms. In particular, trapping of a single atom on a planar photonic integrated resonator at the subwavelength distances required for strong coupling to the guided modes has remained an outstanding challenge. Here we demonstrate efficient trapping of a single ultracold rubidium atom within the evanescent field of an integrated silicon-nitride microring resonator, at distances of 150-200 nm from the chip surface. Efficient, single-stroke loading process is achieved using an evanescent-field mechanism related to Sisyphus cooling, in which a single scattering event dissipates the atom's kinetic energy and transfers it into a near-surface trap. We observe logarithmic scaling of trapping durations spanning from sub-millisecond timescales up to 1 second, without continuous cooling. The trapped atom couples efficiently to the resonator, enabling on-chip photon collection, photon antibunching, and Purcell-enhanced spontaneous emission with single-atom cooperativity exceeding unity. Our results establish the potential of CMOS-compatible chip-based atom-photon interfaces for scalable quantum photonic circuits.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental demonstration of trapping a single ultracold rubidium atom in the evanescent field of a silicon-nitride microring resonator at 150-200 nm from the surface. Loading occurs via a single-stroke evanescent Sisyphus mechanism; the authors observe trapping durations with logarithmic scaling up to 1 s without continuous cooling, together with on-chip photon collection, antibunching, Purcell-enhanced emission, and single-atom cooperativity C>1.

Significance. If the single-atom identification and exclusion of multi-atom or surface-loss artifacts hold, the result would represent a notable step toward scalable, CMOS-compatible atom-photon interfaces. The combination of stable trapping at sub-wavelength distances with direct integration to a high-Q resonator and the reported cooperativity >1 would be of clear interest for quantum photonic circuits and hybrid quantum systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results (trapping-duration data)] Results on trapping-duration statistics (logarithmic scaling to 1 s): the manuscript does not detail how atom number is verified for every recorded event. Without per-event single-atom signatures (e.g., fluorescence histograms, photon-count thresholds, or post-trap imaging) or explicit bounds on multi-atom contamination, the scaling and the claim of stable single-atom trapping remain vulnerable to undetected multi-atom contributions.
  2. [Photon statistics and cooperativity analysis] Cooperativity and Purcell-enhancement claims: the reported C>1 and enhanced spontaneous emission rely on the same single-atom assumption. If a non-negligible fraction of long-duration events involve multiple atoms or surface-induced decoherence, both the cooperativity value and the antibunching data would require re-evaluation; the manuscript provides no quantitative bound on these systematics.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures and Methods] Figure captions and methods should explicitly state the detection efficiency, background subtraction procedure, and any post-selection criteria applied to the duration and g(2) datasets.
  2. [Introduction/Results] The abstract states 'efficient, single-stroke loading' but the main text would benefit from a concise comparison of observed loading rates to theoretical expectations for the Sisyphus mechanism.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. We address the two major comments point by point below, providing additional context from our experimental methods and outlining revisions that will strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results (trapping-duration data)] Results on trapping-duration statistics (logarithmic scaling to 1 s): the manuscript does not detail how atom number is verified for every recorded event. Without per-event single-atom signatures (e.g., fluorescence histograms, photon-count thresholds, or post-trap imaging) or explicit bounds on multi-atom contamination, the scaling and the claim of stable single-atom trapping remain vulnerable to undetected multi-atom contributions.

    Authors: We agree that explicit per-event verification details are essential. Single-atom events are identified via calibrated fluorescence count-rate thresholds (set from independent single-atom loading calibrations) together with the measured photon antibunching g^(2)(0) < 0.5 on the collected light. The logarithmic duration scaling is extracted only from events passing these thresholds. To address the concern, we will add a dedicated paragraph in the results section (and supplementary note) describing the exact threshold values, the calibration procedure, and a quantitative upper bound on multi-atom contamination probability derived from the Poisson loading statistics and the observed antibunching contrast. This revision will make the single-atom assignment fully transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Photon statistics and cooperativity analysis] Cooperativity and Purcell-enhancement claims: the reported C>1 and enhanced spontaneous emission rely on the same single-atom assumption. If a non-negligible fraction of long-duration events involve multiple atoms or surface-induced decoherence, both the cooperativity value and the antibunching data would require re-evaluation; the manuscript provides no quantitative bound on these systematics.

    Authors: The cooperativity C > 1 is extracted from the measured Purcell-enhanced emission rate into the resonator mode relative to the free-space rate, using the observed lifetime reduction and the single-atom fluorescence level. The antibunching measurement provides independent confirmation that the dominant emitters are single atoms. We acknowledge that an explicit quantitative bound on residual multi-atom or surface-decoherence systematics would further strengthen the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add an error-budget analysis that places an upper limit on multi-atom contamination (using the same loading-rate and g^(2) data) and discusses why surface-induced effects are negligible at the reported trap distances and durations. These additions will be placed in the main text and supplementary information. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in experimental demonstration

full rationale

The paper is a purely experimental report of single-atom trapping and coupling in a microring resonator. All central claims (trapping durations with logarithmic scaling, cooperativity >1, antibunching, Purcell enhancement) rest on direct physical measurements and observations rather than any derivation chain, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-referential equations. No load-bearing steps reduce to inputs by construction, and no self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness or ansatzes. The derivation chain is absent, rendering the work self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an experimental demonstration paper. No mathematical derivations or free parameters are introduced in the central claim. Results rely on established quantum optics and atomic physics principles.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of laser cooling, evanescent fields in dielectric resonators, and single-atom fluorescence statistics hold under the experimental conditions.
    These are background principles from prior literature, not invented or fitted for this work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5571 in / 1294 out tokens · 50774 ms · 2026-05-12T04:29:47.055346+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 55 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. L. O’Brien, A. Furusawa, and J. Vučković, Photonic quantum technologies, Nature Photonics3, 687 (2009)

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    D. E. Chang, J. S. Douglas, A. González-Tudela, C.-L. Hung, and H. J. Kimble, Colloquium: Quantum matter built from nanoscopic lattices of atoms and photons, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 031002 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    J. H. Shapiro, Single-photon kerr nonlinearities do not help quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A73, 062305 (2006)

    work page 2006

  4. [4]

    A. N. Poddubny, S. Rosenblum, and B. Dayan, How single-photon switching is quenched with multipleΛ– level atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 113601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    D. E. Chang, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum nonlinear optics – photon by photon, Nature Photonics 8, 685 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    D. Roy, C. M. Wilson, and O. Firstenberg, Colloquium: Strongly interacting photons in one-dimensional contin- uum, Rev. Mod. Phys.89, 021001 (2017)

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    Duan and H

    L.-M. Duan and H. J. Kimble, Scalable photonic quan- tum computation through cavity-assisted interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 127902 (2004)

    work page 2004

  8. [8]

    Dayan, A

    B. Dayan, A. S. Parkins, T. Aoki, E. P. Ostby, K. J. Va- hala, and H. J. Kimble, A photon turnstile dynamically regulated by one atom, Science319, 1062 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Reiserer, N

    A. Reiserer, N. Kalb, G. Rempe, and S. Ritter, A quan- tum gate between a flying optical photon and a single trapped atom, Nature508, 237 (2014)

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Shomroni, S

    I. Shomroni, S. Rosenblum, Y. Lovsky, O. Bechler, G. Guendelman, and B. Dayan, All-optical routing of sin- gle photons by a one-atom switch controlled by a single photon, Science345, 903 (2014)

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    J. Volz, R. Gehr, G. Dubois, J. Estève, and J. Reichel, Nonlinearπphase shift for single fibre-guided photons in- teracting with a single resonator-enhanced atom, Nature Photonics8, 965 (2014)

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    T. G. Tiecke, J. D. Thompson, N. P. de Leon, L. R. Liu, V.Vuletić,andM.D.Lukin,Nanophotonicquantum phase switch with a single atom, Nature508, 241 (2014)

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Rosenblum, O

    S. Rosenblum, O. Bechler, I. Shomroni, Y. Lovsky, G. Guendelman, and B. Dayan, Extraction of a single photon from an optical pulse, Nature Photonics10, 19 (2016)

    work page 2016

  14. [14]

    Scheucher, A

    M. Scheucher, A. Hilico, E. Will, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum optical circulator con- trolled by a single chirally coupled atom, Science354, 1577 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature541, 473 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Bechler, A

    O. Bechler, A. Borne, S. Rosenblum, G. Guendelman, O. E. Mor, M. Netser, T. Ohana, Z. Aqua, N. Drucker, R. Finkelstein, Y. Lovsky, R. Bruch, D. Gurovich, E. Shafir, and B. Dayan, A passive photon–atom qubit swap operation, Nature Physics14, 996 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, and S. Stobbe, Interfacing single photons and single quantum dots with photonic nanostructures, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 347 (2015)

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Aqua and B

    Z. Aqua and B. Dayan, Atom-mediated deterministic generation and stitching of photonic graph states, PRX Quantum6, 010340 (2025)

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  20. [20]

    Ritter, C

    S. Ritter, C. Nölleke, C. Hahn, A. Reiserer, A. Neuzner, M. Uphoff, M. Mücke, E. Figueroa, J. Bochmann, and G. Rempe, An elementary quantum network of single atoms in optical cavities, Nature484, 195 (2012)

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    Wehner, D

    S. Wehner, D. Elkouss, and R. Hanson, Quantum inter- net: A vision for the road ahead, Science362, eaam9288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    J. D. Thompson, T. G. Tiecke, N. P. de Leon, J. Feist, A. V. Akimov, M. Gullans, A. S. Zibrov, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Coupling a single trapped atom to a nanoscale optical cavity, Science340, 1202 (2013)

    work page 2013

  23. [23]

    S. G. Menon, N. Glachman, M. Pompili, A. Dibos, and H. Bernien, An integrated atom array-nanophotonic chip platform with background-free imaging, Nature Commu- nications15, 6156 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    E. Will, L. Masters, A. Rauschenbeutel, M. Scheucher, 10 and J. Volz, Coupling a single trapped atom to a whispering-gallery-mode microresonator, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 233602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [25]

    A.Goban, C.-L.Hung, S.-P.Yu, J.D.Hood, J.A.Muniz, J. H. Lee, M. J. Martin, A. C. McClung, K. S. Choi, D. E. Chang, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, Atom-light inter- actions in photonic crystals, Nature Communications5, 3808 (2014)

    work page 2014

  26. [26]

    Painter, and H

    A.Goban, C.-L.Hung, J.D.Hood, S.-P.Yu, J.A.Muniz, O. Painter, and H. J. Kimble, Superradiance for atoms trapped along a photonic crystal waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 063601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  27. [27]

    Vetsch, D

    E. Vetsch, D. Reitz, G. Sagué, R. Schmidt, S. T. Dawkins, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Optical interface cre- atedbylaser-cooledatomstrappedintheevanescentfield surrounding an optical nanofiber, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 203603 (2010)

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    N. V. Corzo, B. Gouraud, A. Chandra, A. Goban, A. S. Sheremet, D. V. Kupriyanov, and J. Laurat, Large bragg reflection from one-dimensional chains of trapped atoms nearananoscalewaveguide,Phys.Rev.Lett.117,133603 (2016)

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    N. V. Corzo, J. Raskop, A. Chandra, A. S. Sheremet, B. Gouraud, and J. Laurat, Waveguide-coupled single collective excitation of atomic arrays, Nature566, 359 (2019)

    work page 2019

  30. [30]

    Kestler, K

    G. Kestler, K. Ton, D. Filin, C. Cheung, P. Schneeweiss, T. Hoinkes, J. Volz, M. Safronova, A. Rauschenbeutel, and J. Barreiro, State-insensitive trapping of alkaline- earth atoms in a nanofiber-based optical dipole trap, PRX Quantum4, 040308 (2023)

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Hybrid trapping of cold atoms with surface forces and blue-detuned evanescent light on a nanophotonic waveguide,

    R. Pennetta, A. Glicenstein, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Hybrid trapping of cold atoms with surface forces and blue-detuned evanescent light on a nanophotonic waveguide (2025), arXiv:2509.17767 [quant-ph]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    M. E. Kim, T.-H. Chang, B. M. Fields, C.-A. Chen, and C.-L. Hung, Trapping single atoms on a nanophotonic circuit with configurable tweezer lattices, Nature Com- munications10, 1647 (2019)

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    X. Zhou, H. Tamura, T.-H. Chang, and C.-L. Hung, Trapped atoms and superradiance on an integrated nanophotonic microring circuit, Phys. Rev. X14, 031004 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    X. Zhou, H. Tamura, T.-H. Chang, and C.-L. Hung, Cou- pling single atoms to a nanophotonic whispering-gallery- mode resonator via optical guiding, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 103601 (2023)

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    Söding, R

    J. Söding, R. Grimm, and Yu.B. Ovchinnikov, Gravita- tional laser trap for atoms with evanescent-wave cooling, Optics Communications119, 652 (1995)

    work page 1995

  36. [36]

    Y. B. Ovchinnikov, I. Manek, and R. Grimm, Surface trapforcsatomsbasedonevanescent-wavecooling,Phys. Rev. Lett.79, 2225 (1997)

    work page 1997

  37. [37]

    Hammes, D

    M. Hammes, D. Rychtarik, H.-C. Nägerl, and R. Grimm, Cold-atom gas at very high densities in an optical surface microtrap, Physical Review A66, 051401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  38. [38]

    V. V. Volchkov, J. Rührig, T. Pfau, and A. Griesmaier, Sisyphus cooling in a continuously loaded trap, New Journal of Physics15, 093012 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    G. N. Price, S. T. Bannerman, K. Viering, E. Narevi- cius, and M. G. Raizen, Single-Photon Atomic Cooling, Physical Review Letters100, 093004 (2008)

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    Volz and H

    U. Volz and H. Schmoranzer, Precision lifetime measure- ments on alkali atoms and on helium by beam–gas–laser spectroscopy, Physica Scripta1996, 48 (1996)

    work page 1996

  41. [41]

    A. Amir, Y. Oreg, and Y. Imry, On relaxations and aging of various glasses, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences109, 1850 (2012)

    work page 2012

  42. [42]

    Henkel and M

    C. Henkel and M. Wilkens, Heating of trapped atoms near thermal surfaces, Europhysics Letters47, 414 (1999)

    work page 1999

  43. [43]

    Hümmer, P

    D. Hümmer, P. Schneeweiss, A. Rauschenbeutel, and O. Romero-Isart, Heating in Nanophotonic Traps for Cold Atoms, Physical Review X9, 041034 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Y. Meng, A. Dareau, P. Schneeweiss, and A. Rauschen- beutel, Near-ground-state cooling of atoms optically trapped 300 nm away from a hot surface, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031054 (2018)

    work page 2018

  45. [45]

    Samutpraphoot, T

    P. Samutpraphoot, T. Ðorđević, P. L. Ocola, H. Bernien, C. Senko, V. Vuletić, and M. D. Lukin, Strong coupling of two individually controlled atoms via a nanophotonic cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 063602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [46]

    PsiQuantum team, A manufacturable platform for pho- tonic quantum computing, Nature641, 876 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    X. Lu, A. McClung, and K. Srinivasan, High-q slow light and its localization in a photonic crystal microring, Na- ture Photonics16, 66 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Raussendorf, J

    R. Raussendorf, J. Harrington, and K. Goyal, Topologi- cal fault-tolerance in cluster state quantum computation, New Journal of Physics9, 199 (2007)

    work page 2007

  49. [49]

    Berroir, A

    J. Berroir, A. Bouscal, A. Urvoy, T. Ray, and J. Laurat, Nanotrappy: An open-source versatile package for cold- atom trapping close to nanostructures, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013079 (2022)

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    Chang, B

    T.-H. Chang, B. M. Fields, M. E. Kim, and C.-L. Hung, Microring resonators on a suspended membrane circuit for atom-light interactions, Optica6, 1203 (2019)

    work page 2019

  51. [51]

    D. A. Steck, Quantum and atom optics,https: //atomoptics.uoregon.edu/~dsteck/teaching/ quantum-optics/quantum-optics-notes.pdf(2022), revision 0.13.11, available online

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    M. L. Gorodetsky, A. D. Pryamikov, and V. S. Ilchenko, Rayleigh scattering in high-q microspheres, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B17, 1051 (2000)

    work page 2000

  53. [53]

    E. S. Hosseini, S. Yegnanarayanan, A. H. Atabaki, M. Soltani, and A. Adibi, Systematic design and fabrica- tion of high-q single-mode pulley-coupled planar silicon nitride microdisk resonators at visible wavelengths, Opt. Express18, 2127 (2010)

    work page 2010

  54. [54]

    Roberts, X

    S. Roberts, X. Ji, J. Cardenas, M. Corato-Zanarella, and M. Lipson, Measurements and modeling of atomic-scale sidewall roughness and losses in integrated photonic de- vices, Advanced Optical Materials10, 2102073 (2022)

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Jáuregui, Nonperturbative and perturbative treat- ments of parametric heating in atom traps, Phys

    R. Jáuregui, Nonperturbative and perturbative treat- ments of parametric heating in atom traps, Phys. Rev. A 64, 053408 (2001). 11 Supplementary Material S1. TRAP DISTANCE FROM SURFACE VERSUS TRAP WAVELENGTH The distance of the trap minimum from the PIC sur- face is controlled by the interference between the incident tweezer field and its partial reflecti...

    work page 2001