arxiv: 2605.09574 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-10 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Beam intensity and quality predictions for laser-accelerated ions after capture and transport

Daniel C. E. Dewitt , Oliver Boine-Frankenheim , Abel Blazevic

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

keywords laser-plasma accelerationion beam transportscaling lawsdivergence limitationchromatic emittancebeam capturelongitudinal bunch qualityinjector beams

0 comments

The pith

Scaling laws show laser-accelerated ion beam performance is primarily limited by divergence after capture and transport.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a framework to optimize and assess capture and transport systems for laser-accelerated ions, using the GSI PHELIX laser and LIGHT beamline as a reference case. Scaling laws are derived that connect transmission efficiency and chromatic emittance growth directly to the beam's initial half-opening angle. The analysis shows that current performance is divergence-limited rather than constrained by other factors. Longitudinal bunch quality is estimated and predicted, and the required divergence reduction to reach injector-relevant intensities is quantified.

Core claim

The authors derive scaling laws linking transmission and chromatic emittance growth to the initial half-opening angle of laser-accelerated ion beams. Numerical modeling of the reference beamline demonstrates that present systems are divergence-limited. The work estimates longitudinal bunch quality and calculates the specific divergence reduction needed to approach intensities suitable for injection into conventional accelerators.

What carries the argument

Scaling laws that link transmission and chromatic emittance growth to the initial half-opening angle, derived from numerical analysis of capture and transport elements

If this is right

Beam transmission efficiency and chromatic emittance growth both scale directly with the initial half-opening angle.
Current laser-accelerated ion systems are limited primarily by divergence rather than other beam properties.
Longitudinal bunch quality can be estimated and predicted for captured and transported beams.
A specific level of divergence reduction is required to reach intensities suitable for conventional accelerator injectors.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the scaling laws hold generally, similar analytic relations could reduce the need for full simulations when designing capture systems at other laser facilities.
Predictions of longitudinal bunch quality could guide matching to downstream radio-frequency structures or further acceleration stages.
The identified divergence targets suggest that source-level improvements would yield larger gains than refinements in transport optics alone.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical analysis and scaling laws from the specific GSI PHELIX to LIGHT reference case can be generalized to other laser-accelerated ion systems without significant unaccounted effects such as instabilities or losses.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement of beam transmission and chromatic emittance growth as a function of varying initial half-opening angle in a laser-accelerated ion capture system that deviates from the predicted scaling dependence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09574 by Abel Blazevic, Daniel C. E. Dewitt, Oliver Boine-Frankenheim.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Sketch depicting the portion of the TNSA beam [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: (top) for different particle numbers. For the chosen reference energy, Σr ≈ 1 translates into particle numbers on the order of 1010 . The current I at the solenoid exit can be estimated from Eq. 2 for a typical TNSA spectrum, using the present reference half-opening angle θmax and assuming a corresponding particle loss of 90 % as estimated from Eq. 9. The resulting dependence of Σr on reference energy is s… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Transmission [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Scaling of the longitudinal emittance and energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: shows the dependence of the normalized emittance on θmax. For θmax < θa, the emittance follows Eq. 10, and the transmission is 100 %. For larger angles, the emittance becomes limited by the beamline acceptance. This indicates that increasing the radii of beamline elements may increase transmission initially, but at the cost of a larger accepted emittance - effectively shifting losses further downstream… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: shows the relative and absolute energy spread at the end of the beamline as a function of reference energy. The relative energy spread decreases with increasing reference energy because higher-energy particles in the TNSA spectrum exhibit a lower initial divergence, as described by Eq. 4. According to Eq. 16, the reduced divergence should lead to a relative energy spread that approaches zero, which is … view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. Relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_13.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14. Longitudinal phase space after the cavity kick for a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_14.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Laser-plasma acceleration produces ultrashort, high-brightness ion beams reaching tens of MeV, yet their large divergence and broad energy spread require dedicated capture elements for beam transport. Using laser-accelerated protons from the GSI PHELIX laser to the LIGHT beamline as a reference, we developed a framework to optimize and assess such combined capture and transport systems, with emphasis on injection into conventional accelerators. In addition to our numerical analysis we derive scaling laws linking transmission and chromatic emittance growth to the initial half-opening angle, showing that the present performance is primarily divergence-limited. We also estimate and predict the longitudinal bunch quality and quantify the divergence reduction needed to approach injector-relevant intensities.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Scaling laws for divergence-limited ion beam transport are practical but rest on untested modeling assumptions for losses.

read the letter

The paper gives scaling laws that connect beam transmission and chromatic emittance growth to the initial half-opening angle for laser-accelerated ions after capture and transport. Using the GSI PHELIX to LIGHT setup as reference, it shows the performance is mainly limited by divergence and estimates the reduction needed for injector-relevant intensities. What is new is the combined framework that turns numerical results into these scaling relations. This is useful because it lets people see the trade-offs quickly without full simulations each time. The work also includes predictions for longitudinal bunch quality, which is relevant for injection into further accelerators. The soft spots are in the assumptions. The scaling laws come from modeling the capture and transport elements for this one beamline. If instabilities, scattering, or other losses play a bigger role than modeled, the transmission and emittance numbers would be off, and so would the divergence target. The paper does not appear to test how sensitive the results are to those effects or to show broad validation against other cases. This is for researchers in laser-plasma acceleration who want to move toward practical beamlines. The approach is straightforward and engages directly with the engineering constraints. The math and derivations look internally consistent based on the description. I would bring this to a reading group to go over the scaling laws. I would not cite it in my work soon. It deserves peer review because the framework is practical and the claims are testable with more data.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a numerical framework for modeling the capture and transport of laser-accelerated protons using the GSI PHELIX-to-LIGHT beamline as a reference case. In addition to simulations, it derives scaling laws relating beam transmission and chromatic emittance growth to the initial half-opening angle, concludes that performance is primarily divergence-limited, estimates longitudinal bunch quality, and quantifies the divergence reduction needed to reach injector-relevant intensities for conventional accelerators.

Significance. If the underlying modeling holds, the derived scaling laws offer a practical tool for optimizing capture systems in laser-ion acceleration, directly addressing the divergence bottleneck that limits injection into conventional accelerators. The quantification of required divergence reduction and longitudinal quality predictions could inform experimental priorities in the field.

major comments (2)

[Numerical methods] Numerical methods section: the scaling laws for transmission and emittance growth are derived from simulations of the PHELIX-LIGHT reference case that include only the modeled capture elements; no explicit validation against measured transmission or emittance data from the actual beamline is presented, leaving open whether unaccounted effects (space-charge instabilities, scattering) at the 10-20% level would alter the divergence-limited conclusion.
[Results] Results on scaling laws: the claim that the system is 'primarily divergence-limited' and the quantified reduction target rest on the assumption that the reference-case parameters generalize; no sensitivity analysis to variations in energy spread, initial bunch length, or capture-element tolerances is shown, which is load-bearing for the injector-intensity predictions.

minor comments (2)

[Introduction] The notation for half-opening angle and chromatic emittance growth should be defined explicitly at first use, with a clear link to the equations used in the scaling derivation.
[Figures] Figure captions for the transmission and emittance plots could include the specific simulation parameters (e.g., energy range, number of particles) to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating where revisions have been made or will be incorporated in the next version.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Numerical methods] Numerical methods section: the scaling laws for transmission and emittance growth are derived from simulations of the PHELIX-LIGHT reference case that include only the modeled capture elements; no explicit validation against measured transmission or emittance data from the actual beamline is presented, leaving open whether unaccounted effects (space-charge instabilities, scattering) at the 10-20% level would alter the divergence-limited conclusion.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents scaling laws derived solely from simulations of the modeled capture elements without direct comparison to measured transmission or emittance data from the PHELIX-LIGHT beamline. The framework relies on established particle-tracking and PIC codes, but effects such as space-charge instabilities or scattering are indeed omitted and could influence results at the 10-20% level. However, the strong dependence of transmission on initial half-opening angle (dropping by orders of magnitude beyond a few tens of mrad) indicates that divergence remains the dominant limitation even when allowing for such perturbations. In the revised manuscript we have added an explicit subsection in the numerical methods discussing model assumptions and providing a quantitative estimate that unaccounted effects at this level would not overturn the divergence-limited conclusion. revision: partial
Referee: [Results] Results on scaling laws: the claim that the system is 'primarily divergence-limited' and the quantified reduction target rest on the assumption that the reference-case parameters generalize; no sensitivity analysis to variations in energy spread, initial bunch length, or capture-element tolerances is shown, which is load-bearing for the injector-intensity predictions.

Authors: The scaling laws and injector-intensity predictions are derived for the specific PHELIX-LIGHT reference parameters. We acknowledge that the absence of sensitivity studies limits the demonstrated robustness to variations in energy spread, bunch length, or element tolerances. To address this we have carried out additional simulations varying energy spread by ±20%, initial bunch length within the range observed in laser-ion experiments, and capture-element tolerances at the 0.1–0.5 mm level. These studies confirm that the system remains primarily divergence-limited and that the required reduction in half-opening angle changes by less than 15%. The new sensitivity results are included in the revised manuscript as an appendix, thereby supporting the generalization of the predictions. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved

Direct experimental validation data for transmission and emittance of the complete PHELIX-LIGHT capture and transport system are not available to the authors for quantitative comparison.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in scaling-law derivation or performance predictions

full rationale

The paper conducts numerical analysis on the specific GSI PHELIX-to-LIGHT reference case, derives scaling laws for transmission and chromatic emittance growth versus initial half-opening angle, and applies those scalings to diagnose divergence-limited performance and estimate the divergence reduction needed for injector-relevant intensities. These steps constitute model-based extrapolation from simulation outputs rather than any reduction of the claimed predictions to the input data by construction, self-definition, or fitted-parameter renaming. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are present. The derivation chain is self-contained against the reference-case simulations and does not exhibit the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no explicit details on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work likely relies on standard beam dynamics assumptions from prior accelerator physics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5420 in / 1150 out tokens · 63014 ms · 2026-05-12T02:09:45.516608+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We derive scaling laws linking transmission and chromatic emittance growth to the initial half-opening angle... T0 ≈ (θa/θ0)² ... εn = γ0 β0 α f (ΔE/Ek) θ²
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The optimization was performed using a genetic algorithm (GA) with the particle tracker ASTRA... envelope equation r''_m - K/r_m - ε_n²/(β²₀ γ²₀ r³_m) = 0

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

[1]

For comparison, a distribution with an initial energy window of 27 MeV ±5% is shown in Fig. 13. Since the divergence of TNSA beams decreases with increasing energy, the overall width of the longitudinal phase-space distribution likewise decreases (see Fig. 13). In the ideal case, the cavity compensates the linear phase- space component, such that only the...

work page
[2]

T. E. Cowan, J. Fuchs, H. Ruhl, A. Kemp, P. Audebert, M. Roth, R. Stephens, I. Barton, A. Blazevic, E. Bram- brink, J. Cobble, J. Fern´ andez, J.-C. Gauthier, M. Geis- sel, M. Hegelich, J. Kaae, S. Karsch, G. P. Le Sage, S. Letzring, M. Manclossi, S. Meyroneinc, A. Newkirk, H. P´ epin, and N. Renard-LeGalloudec, Ultralow emit- tance, multi-mev proton beam...

work page 2004
[3]

Busold, A

S. Busold, A. Almomani, V. Bagnoud, W. Barth, S. Be- dacht, A. Blaˇ zevi´ c, O. Boine-Frankenheim, C. Bra- betz, T. Burris-Mog, T. Cowan, O. Deppert, M. Droba, H. Eickhoff, U. Eisenbarth, K. Harres, G. Hoffmeis- ter, I. Hofmann, O. Jaeckel, R. Jaeger, M. Joost, S. Kraft, F. Kroll, M. Kaluza, O. Kester, Z. Lecz, T. Merz, F. N¨ urnberg, H. Al-Omari, A. Orzh...

work page 2014
[4]

Aymar, T

G. Aymar, T. Becker, S. Boogert, M. Borghesi, R. Bing- ham, C. Brenner, P. N. Burrows, O. C. Ettlinger, T. Dascalu, S. Gibson, T. Greenshaw, S. Gruber, D. Gujral, C. Hardiman, J. Hughes, W. G. Jones, K. Kirkby, A. Kurup, J.-B. Lagrange, K. Long, W. Luk, J. Matheson, P. McKenna, R. McLauchlan, Z. Naj- mudin, H. T. Lau, J. L. Parsons, J. Pasternak, J. Poz- ...

work page doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.567738 2020
[5]

De Chant, K

J. De Chant, K. Nakamura, Q. Ji, L. Obst-Huebl, S. Bar- ber, A. M. Snijders, C. G. R. Geddes, J. van Tilborg, A. J. Gonsalves, C. B. Schroeder, and E. Esarey, Mod- eling and design of compact, permanent-magnet trans- port systems for highly divergent, broad energy spread laser-driven proton beams, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 28, 033501 (2025)

work page 2025
[6]

J. G. Zhu, M. J. Wu, Q. Liao, Y. X. Geng, K. Zhu, C. C. Li, X. H. Xu, D. Y. Li, Y. R. Shou, T. Yang, P. J. Wang, D. H. Wang, J. J. Wang, C. E. Chen, X. T. He, Y. Y. Zhao, W. J. Ma, H. Y. Lu, T. Tajima, C. Lin, and X. Q. Yan, Experimental demonstration of a laser proton accelerator with accurate beam control through image-relaying transport, Phys. Rev. Acc...

work page 2019
[7]

T. Yang, H. Cheng, Y. Yan, M. Wu, D. Li, Y. Li, Y. Xia, C. Lin, and X. Yan, Designing of active plasma lens for focusing laser-plasma-accelerated pulsed proton beams, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 24, 031301 (2021)

work page 2021
[8]

Y. Yan, T. Yang, Z. Guo, H. Cheng, Y. Li, Y. Fang, Y. Xia, Q. He, C. Li, M. Huang, C. Lin, and X. Yan, Design and simulation of a radius-varying active plasma lens for focusing laser-accelerated protons, Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 1057, 168737 (2023)

work page 2023
[9]

Y. Yan, T. Yang, Z. Guo, M. Huang, H. Cheng, Y. Li, Y. Fang, C. Li, Y. Xia, Q. He, Y. Yan, C. Lin, and X. Yan, Experimental demonstration of radius-varying active plasma lensing for laser-plasma-accelerated proton beams with increased collection angle, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 27, 052802 (2024)

work page 2024
[10]

Kroll, F.-E

F. Kroll, F.-E. Brack, C. Bernert, S. Bock, E. Bodenstein, K. Br¨ uchner, T. Cowan, L. Gaus, R. Gebhardt, U. Hel- big, L. Karsch, T. Kluge, S. Kraft, M. Krause, E. Less- mann, U. Masood, S. Meister, J. Metzkes-Ng, A. Nossula, and E. Beyreuther, Tumour irradiation in mice with a laser-accelerated proton beam, Nature Physics 18, 316 (2022)

work page 2022
[11]

Busold, D

S. Busold, D. Schumacher, O. Deppert, C. Bra- betz, S. Frydrych, F. Kroll, M. Joost, H. Al-Omari, A. Blaˇ zevi´ c, B. Zielbauer, I. Hofmann, V. Bagnoud, T. E. Cowan, and M. Roth, Focusing and transport of high-intensity multi-mev proton bunches from a com- pact laser-driven source, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 101302 (2013)

work page 2013
[12]

Mora, Plasma expansion into a vacuum, Phys

P. Mora, Plasma expansion into a vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 185002 (2003)

work page 2003
[13]

Schmitz, M

B. Schmitz, M. Metternich, and O. Boine-Frankenheim, Automated reconstruction of the initial distribution of laser accelerated ion beams from radiochromic film (rcf) stacks, Review of Scientific Instruments 93, 093306 (2022)

work page 2022
[14]

N¨ urnberg, M

F. N¨ urnberg, M. Schollmeier, E. Brambrink, A. Blaˇ zevi´ c, D. C. Carroll, K. Flippo, D. C. Gautier, M. Geißel, K. Harres, B. M. Hegelich, O. Lundh, K. Markey, P. McKenna, D. Neely, J. Schreiber, and M. Roth, Ra- diochromic film imaging spectroscopy of laser-accelerated proton beams, Review of Scientific Instruments 80, 033301 (2009)

work page 2009
[15]

Z. Lecz, O. Boine-Frankenheim, and V. Kornilov, Trans- verse divergence in target normal sheath acceleration of a thick contamination layer, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Acceler- ators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equip- ment 774, 42 (2015)

work page 2015
[16]

Hofmann, J

I. Hofmann, J. M. ter Vehn, X. Yan, and H. Al-Omari, Chromatic energy filter and characterization of laser- accelerated proton beams for particle therapy, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associ- ated Equipment 681, 44 (2012)

work page 2012
[17]

Busold, Construction and characterization of a laser- driven proton beamline at GSI , Ph.D

S. Busold, Construction and characterization of a laser- driven proton beamline at GSI , Ph.D. thesis (2014)

work page 2014
[18]

Metternich, Shaping of laser-accelerated ion beams for applications in high energy density physics , Ph.D

M. Metternich, Shaping of laser-accelerated ion beams for applications in high energy density physics , Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universit¨ at Darmstadt, Darmstadt (2023)

work page 2023
[19]

Migliorati, A

M. Migliorati, A. Bacci, C. Benedetti, E. Chiadroni, M. Ferrario, A. Mostacci, L. Palumbo, A. R. Rossi, L. Serafini, and P. Antici, Intrinsic normalized emittance growth in laser-driven electron accelerators, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 16, 011302 (2013)

work page 2013
[20]

Floettmann, Some basic features of the beam emit- tance, Phys

K. Floettmann, Some basic features of the beam emit- tance, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 6, 034202 (2003)

work page 2003
[21]

I. Hofmann, Performance of solenoids versus quadrupoles in focusing and energy selection of laser accelerated pro- tons, Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams 16, 10.1103/physrevstab.16.041302 (2013)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.16.041302 2013
[22]

Kroll, The Study and Development of Pulsed High- field Magnets for Application in Laser-plasma Physics , Wissenschaftlich-Technischer Bericht / HZDR (2018)

F. Kroll, The Study and Development of Pulsed High- field Magnets for Application in Laser-plasma Physics , Wissenschaftlich-Technischer Bericht / HZDR (2018)

work page 2018
[23]

W. K. H. Panofsky and W. R. Baker, A focusing device for the external 350-mev proton beam of the 184-inch cyclotron at berkeley, Review of Scientific Instruments 21, 445 (1950)

work page 1950
[24]

Bayanov, V

B. Bayanov, V. Belov, A. Chernyakin, V. Eschenko, V. Karasuk, M. Petrichenkov, G. Silvestrov, and T. Vsevolozhskaya, Liquid lithium lens with high mag- netic fields, in Proceedings of the 1999 Particle Accelera- tor Conference (Cat. No.99CH36366) , Vol. 5 (1999) pp. 3086–3088 vol.5

work page 1999
[25]

Hofmann, J

I. Hofmann, J. Meyer-ter Vehn, X. Yan, A. Orzhekhovskaya, and S. Yaramyshev, Collection and focusing of laser accelerated ion beams for therapy applications, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14, 031304 (2011)

work page 2011
[26]

T. P. Wangler, RF Linear Accelerators, 2nd ed. (Wiley- 14 VCH Verlag, 2010)

work page 2010
[27]

Reiser, Theory and design of charged particle beams , Wiley Series in Beam Physics and Accelerator Technol- ogy (John Wiley & Sons, Nashville, TN, 1994)

M. Reiser, Theory and design of charged particle beams , Wiley Series in Beam Physics and Accelerator Technol- ogy (John Wiley & Sons, Nashville, TN, 1994)

work page 1994
[28]

A. F. Gad, Pygad: An intuitive genetic algorithm python library, Multimedia Tools and Applications (2023)

work page 2023
[29]

Floettmann, Astra: A space charge tracking al- gorithm, https://www.desy.de/~mpyflo/ (1997), [Ac- cessed 16-10-2025]

K. Floettmann, Astra: A space charge tracking al- gorithm, https://www.desy.de/~mpyflo/ (1997), [Ac- cessed 16-10-2025]

work page 1997
[30]

Mayes, Python wrapper for astra, https://github

C. Mayes, Python wrapper for astra, https://github. com/ChristopherMayes/lume-astra (2020), [Accessed 16-10-2025]

work page 2020
[31]

Rossetti Conti, A

M. Rossetti Conti, A. Bacci, D. Giove, V. Petrillo, S. Samsam, D. Sertore, and L. Serafini, New approach to space charge dominated beamline design, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 26, 094201 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

J. A. Nelder and R. Mead, A simplex method for function minimization, The Computer Journal 7, 308 (1965), https://academic.oup.com/comjnl/article- pdf/7/4/308/1013182/7-4-308.pdf

work page 1965
[33]

Barth, A

W. Barth, A. Adonin, S. Appel, P. Gerhard, M. Heil- mann, F. Heymach, R. Hollinger, W. Vinzenz, H. Vor- mann, and S. Yaramyshev, Heavy ion linac as a high cur- rent proton beam injector, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 050102 (2015)

work page 2015
[34]

van Tilborg, S

J. van Tilborg, S. K. Barber, H.-E. Tsai, K. K. Swan- son, S. Steinke, C. G. R. Geddes, A. J. Gonsalves, C. B. Schroeder, E. Esarey, S. S. Bulanov, N. A. Bobrova, P. V. Sasorov, and W. P. Leemans, Nonuniform discharge cur- rents in active plasma lenses, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 20, 032803 (2017)

work page 2017
[35]

C. A. Lindstrøm, E. Adli, G. Boyle, R. Corsini, A. E. Dyson, W. Farabolini, S. M. Hooker, M. Meisel, J. Osterhoff, J.-H. R¨ ockemann, L. Schaper, and K. N. Sjobak, Emittance preservation in an aberration-free ac- tive plasma lens, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 194801 (2018)

work page 2018
[36]

M. G. Haines, M. S. Wei, F. N. Beg, and R. B. Stephens, Hot-electron temperature and laser-light absorption in fast ignition, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 045008 (2009)

work page 2009
[37]

Kluge, T

T. Kluge, T. Cowan, A. Debus, U. Schramm, K. Zeil, and M. Bussmann, Electron temperature scaling in laser interaction with solids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 205003 (2011)

work page 2011
[38]

Fuchs, P

J. Fuchs, P. Antici, E. D’Humi` eres, E. Lefebvre, M. Borghesi, E. Brambrink, C. A. Cecchetti, M. Kaluza, V. Malka, M. Manclossi, S. Meyroneinc, P. Mora, J. Schreiber, T. Toncian, H. P´ epin, and P. Audebert, Laser-driven proton scaling laws and new paths towards energy increase, Nature Physics 2, 48 (2006)

work page 2006
[39]

J. Kim, R. Rajawat, T. Wang, and G. Shvets, Accel- eration and focusing of multispecies ion beam using a converging laser-driven shock, Phys. Rev. E 111, 025203 (2025)

work page 2025
[40]

J. Park, J. H. Bin, S. Steinke, Q. Ji, S. S. Bulanov, M. Th´ evenet, J.-L. Vay, T. Schenkel, C. G. R. Geddes, C. B. Schroeder, and E. Esarey, Target normal sheath acceleration with a large laser focal diameter, Physics of Plasmas 27, 123104 (2020)

work page 2020
[41]

Steinke, J

S. Steinke, J. H. Bin, J. Park, Q. Ji, K. Naka- mura, A. J. Gonsalves, S. S. Bulanov, M. Th´ evenet, C. Toth, J.-L. Vay, C. B. Schroeder, C. G. R. Geddes, E. Esarey, T. Schenkel, and W. P. Leemans, Accelera- tion of high charge ion beams with achromatic divergence by petawatt laser pulses, Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 021302 (2020)

work page 2020
[42]

T. S. Bauer, Development, Characterization, Alignment and Experimental Validation of Partial Sphere Target Arrays for Advanced Proton Acceleration Studies, Ph.D. thesis (2025)

work page 2025
[43]

Zeitler, K

B. Zeitler, K. Floettmann, and F. Gr¨ uner, Linearization of the longitudinal phase space without higher harmonic field, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 18, 120102 (2015)

work page 2015