pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.09680 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-10 · 💻 cs.CY

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Cost-of-Ethics Crisis: Beliefs, Decisions, and Justifications in the Job Searches of Computer Science Students in Canada and the United States

Mohamed Abdalla , Sahar Abdalla , Alicia Cappello , Kyrie Dowling , Danae Metaxa , David G. Widder , Catherine Stinson
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CY
keywords computer science ethicsjob search decisionsethical decision makingCS studentsmoral justificationsworkplace ethicsethics education
0
0 comments X

The pith

Most computer science students prioritize compensation, location, and workplace culture over ethical concerns when choosing jobs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper surveys 129 computer science students and recent graduates in Canada and the United States on how they approach their job searches. It reports that ethical and social issues rank below practical considerations such as pay, location, and company culture. Students who voice ethical worries still often accept roles at organizations they view as problematic, explaining the choice through shared reasons like financial necessity or the belief that no fully ethical options exist. The work concludes that current ethics education shows limited transfer to this first major career decision. The findings point to a need for curriculum changes that connect ethical reasoning more directly to employment trade-offs.

Core claim

Computer science students and recent graduates place higher priority on compensation, location, and workplace culture than on ethical or social issues during job searches; those who express ethical concerns commonly justify accepting contradictory positions by citing the need to earn money or the perceived impossibility of avoiding unethical employers.

What carries the argument

Self-reported priorities and justifications collected from survey responses about job-search decisions.

If this is right

  • Ethics education in computer science may have limited effect on graduates' first major career choices without addressing practical trade-offs.
  • Industry norms can persist when new hires accept roles despite their stated reservations.
  • Curricula could be updated to include practice with real ethical compromises that arise in employment decisions.
  • Educators and employers may need to design interventions that reduce the gap between taught values and observed actions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If rationalizations like financial need become standard, companies may encounter little external pressure to change problematic practices.
  • A longitudinal follow-up that records actual job acceptances could check whether expressed concerns predict real behavior.
  • Similar patterns of justification might appear in other technical fields where graduates enter industries with known ethical issues.

Load-bearing premise

Self-reported survey answers from 129 participants reflect actual decision processes and beliefs rather than post-hoc rationalizations or social-desirability effects.

What would settle it

Tracking the same participants after the survey to see whether those who voiced ethical concerns actually avoided the companies they flagged as problematic.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.09680 by Alicia Cappello, Catherine Stinson, Danae Metaxa, David G. Widder, Kyrie Dowling, Mohamed Abdalla, Sahar Abdalla.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The decimal percentage of respondents who [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The decimal percentage of respondents who [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The decimal percentage of respondents who [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Decimal percentage of respondents (recently graduated or in their 4th year) who selected each level of concern for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Self views for all respondents (recently graduated or in their 4th year) for all concerns. Each row represents the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Workplace norms in computer science have received growing attention due to a series of recent ethical scandals. One type of response has been a push to improve the ethics education provided to computer science students. Evidence for the effectiveness of ethics education remains mixed; some evidence suggests that norms are changing, while gaps between stated values and practice remain. Our focus here is on whether students, who have received some contemporary CS ethics education, are able to effectively apply ethical reasoning to their own decision-making in what is typically the first significant ethical decision of their careers: their job search. Our study examines the ethical decision making of 129 computer science students and recent graduates during their job searches. We find that most students prioritize factors like compensation, location, and workplace culture over ethical and social issues. Even when expressing ethical concerns, respondents often justify taking actions contradicting their moral views through commonly-shared explanations such as desire to make money or the perceived inability to avoid unethical workplaces. This work sheds light on the disconnect between ethics education and real-world CS graduate decision making. We offer insights for evolving curricula to better address practical ethical dilemmas, with implications for educators and industry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from a survey of 129 computer science students and recent graduates in Canada and the United States on their job-search priorities and ethical justifications. The central claims are that most respondents prioritize compensation, location, and workplace culture over ethical or social issues, and that even when ethical concerns are expressed, participants commonly justify contradictory actions via shared rationales such as financial necessity or the perceived impossibility of avoiding unethical employers. The paper positions these findings as evidence of a disconnect between contemporary CS ethics education and real-world decision-making, with implications for curriculum design.

Significance. If the survey data reliably capture decision processes rather than artifacts of elicitation, the work would document a practically important gap between stated ethics training and first-career choices in CS, offering concrete guidance for educators. The study addresses a timely topic with direct relevance to industry hiring and curriculum reform. However, the absence of methodological transparency noted in the abstract and the unaddressed risk of post-hoc rationalization in self-reports substantially weaken the current evidential basis for these claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and implied Methods section): The abstract states clear findings from a survey of 129 respondents but provides no details on sampling method, response rate, question wording, statistical tests, or inter-rater reliability for qualitative coding. This omission is load-bearing because the central claim that 'most students prioritize factors like compensation, location, and workplace culture over ethical and social issues' cannot be evaluated without these elements.
  2. [Results] Results/Discussion (inferred from abstract): The claim that respondents 'often justify taking actions contradicting their moral views through commonly-shared explanations' rests on qualitative coding whose reliability is not reported. Without inter-rater reliability metrics or description of how contradictions were identified, it is unclear whether the observed patterns reflect stable justifications or post-hoc rationalizations, directly undermining the interpretation offered for the ethics-education disconnect.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could explicitly note the reliance on self-report data and any steps taken to mitigate social-desirability bias.
  2. [Introduction] The manuscript would benefit from situating the 129-participant sample size and recruitment channels against prior surveys of CS student ethics attitudes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, clarifying existing content in the full paper and outlining specific revisions to improve transparency and address concerns about methodological rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and implied Methods section): The abstract states clear findings from a survey of 129 respondents but provides no details on sampling method, response rate, question wording, statistical tests, or inter-rater reliability for qualitative coding. This omission is load-bearing because the central claim that 'most students prioritize factors like compensation, location, and workplace culture over ethical and social issues' cannot be evaluated without these elements.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from additional methodological context to allow readers to assess the claims more readily. The full manuscript includes a Methods section detailing participant recruitment (via university CS department lists, online forums, and social media targeting Canadian and US CS students/recent graduates), the survey instrument (mix of ranking/Likert items on job priorities and open-ended questions on ethical concerns and justifications), and the analysis (primarily descriptive frequencies supplemented by thematic coding). No formal inferential statistical tests were applied. We will revise the abstract to concisely note the sample size and composition, recruitment approach, and the dual quantitative-qualitative analysis strategy. We will also expand the Methods section with explicit question examples and confirm the absence of response rate tracking (as the survey was distributed via open channels without unique identifiers). revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results/Discussion (inferred from abstract): The claim that respondents 'often justify taking actions contradicting their moral views through commonly-shared explanations' rests on qualitative coding whose reliability is not reported. Without inter-rater reliability metrics or description of how contradictions were identified, it is unclear whether the observed patterns reflect stable justifications or post-hoc rationalizations, directly undermining the interpretation offered for the ethics-education disconnect.

    Authors: We will add a detailed description in the Methods section of how contradictions were identified: by systematically comparing each participant's stated ethical concerns (from open-ended responses) against their reported job priorities and actual or intended decisions. Thematic coding followed an inductive approach with iterative refinement of codes for common justifications (e.g., financial necessity, lack of alternatives). The primary coding was performed by one author, with team discussions to resolve ambiguities and ensure consistency; however, formal inter-rater reliability metrics such as Cohen's kappa were not computed. We acknowledge this as a limitation and will explicitly discuss the potential for post-hoc rationalization inherent in self-report data, while noting that the recurrence of similar themes across independent responses lends support to the patterns. A new limitations subsection will be added to the Discussion. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical survey with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper reports results from a survey of 129 CS students on job-search priorities and ethical justifications. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, predictions derived from models, or load-bearing self-citations. All claims are direct summaries of participant responses; there is no derivation chain that reduces any result to its own inputs by construction. This is a standard descriptive empirical study whose evidence is external to any internal formalism.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that survey self-reports validly measure ethical beliefs and decision processes; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms beyond standard social-science survey assumptions are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Self-reported survey answers accurately reflect participants' true beliefs, priorities, and justifications rather than social-desirability bias or post-hoc rationalization.
    This assumption is required to interpret the reported disconnect between stated ethics and actual job choices.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5534 in / 1192 out tokens · 38060 ms · 2026-05-12T04:04:17.022353+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

276 extracted references · 276 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abril and Robert Plant

    Patricia S. Abril and Robert Plant. The patent holder's dilemma: Buy, sell, or troll?. Communications of the ACM. 2007. doi:10.1145/1188913.1188915

    work page doi:10.1145/1188913.1188915 2007

  2. [2]

    Deciding equivalances among conjunctive aggregate queries

    Sarah Cohen and Werner Nutt and Yehoshua Sagic. Deciding equivalances among conjunctive aggregate queries. doi:10.1145/1219092.1219093

    work page doi:10.1145/1219092.1219093

  3. [3]

    Special issue: Digital Libraries. 1996

    work page 1996

  4. [4]

    Understanding Policy-Based Networking

    David Kosiur. Understanding Policy-Based Networking. 2001

    work page 2001

  5. [7]

    The title of book two. 2008. doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-09237-4 2008

  6. [8]

    Asad Z. Spector. Achieving application requirements. Distributed Systems. 1990. doi:10.1145/90417.90738

    work page doi:10.1145/90417.90738 1990

  7. [9]

    Douglass and David Harel and Mark B

    Bruce P. Douglass and David Harel and Mark B. Trakhtenbrot. Statecarts in use: structured analysis and object-orientation. Lectures on Embedded Systems. 1998. doi:10.1007/3-540-65193-4_29

    work page doi:10.1007/3-540-65193-4_29 1998

  8. [10]

    Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming, Vol. 1: Fundamental Algorithms (3rd. ed.). 1997

    work page 1997

  9. [11]

    Donald E. Knuth. The Art of Computer Programming. 1998

    work page 1998

  10. [12]

    Structured Variational Inference Procedures and their Realizations (as incol)

    Dan Geiger and Christopher Meek. Structured Variational Inference Procedures and their Realizations (as incol). Proceedings of Tenth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, The Barbados

    work page

  11. [13]

    Stan W. Smith. An experiment in bibliographic mark-up: Parsing metadata for XML export. Proceedings of the 3rd. annual workshop on Librarians and Computers. 2010. doi:99.9999/woot07-S422

    work page 2010

  12. [14]

    Catch me, if you can: Evading network signatures with web-based polymorphic worms

    Matthew Van Gundy and Davide Balzarotti and Giovanni Vigna. Catch me, if you can: Evading network signatures with web-based polymorphic worms. Proceedings of the first USENIX workshop on Offensive Technologies

    work page

  13. [15]

    Predicate Path expressions

    Sten Andler. Predicate Path expressions. Proceedings of the 6th. ACM SIGACT-SIGPLAN symposium on Principles of Programming Languages. 1979. doi:10.1145/567752.567774

    work page doi:10.1145/567752.567774 1979

  14. [16]

    LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER

    David Harel. LOGICS of Programs: AXIOMATICS and DESCRIPTIVE POWER. 1978

    work page 1978

  15. [17]

    Anisi , title =

    David A. Anisi , title =

    work page

  16. [18]

    Clarkson

    Kenneth L. Clarkson. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry). 1985

    work page 1985

  17. [19]

    Introduction to Bayesian Statistics

    Harry Thornburg. Introduction to Bayesian Statistics. 2001

    work page 2001

  18. [20]

    CLIFFORD: a Maple 11 Package for Clifford Algebra Computations, version 11

    Rafal Ablamowicz and Bertfried Fauser. CLIFFORD: a Maple 11 Package for Clifford Algebra Computations, version 11. 2007

    work page 2007

  19. [21]

    Stats and Analysis

    Poker-Edge.Com. Stats and Analysis. 2006

    work page 2006

  20. [22]

    A more perfect union

    Barack Obama. A more perfect union. 2008

    work page 2008

  21. [23]

    The fountain of youth

    Joseph Scientist. The fountain of youth. 2009

    work page 2009

  22. [24]

    Solder man

    Dave Novak. Solder man. ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Video Review on Animation theater Program: Part I - Vol. 145 (July 27--27, 2003). 2003. doi:99.9999/woot07-S422

    work page 2003

  23. [25]

    Interview with Bill Kinder: January 13, 2005

    Newton Lee. Interview with Bill Kinder: January 13, 2005. Comput. Entertain. 2005. doi:10.1145/1057270.1057278

    work page doi:10.1145/1057270.1057278 2005

  24. [26]

    The Enabling of Digital Libraries

    Bernard Rous. The Enabling of Digital Libraries. Digital Libraries. 2008

    work page 2008

  25. [28]

    (new) Finding minimum congestion spanning trees , journal =

    Werneck, Renato and Setubal, Jo\. (new) Finding minimum congestion spanning trees , journal =. doi:10.1145/351827.384253 , acmid = 384253, publisher =

    work page doi:10.1145/351827.384253

  26. [30]

    and Mei, Alessandro , title =

    Conti, Mauro and Di Pietro, Roberto and Mancini, Luigi V. and Mei, Alessandro , title =. Inf. Fusion , volume =. 2009 , issn =. doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2009.01.002 , acmid =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2009.01.002 2009

  27. [31]

    and Hutchful, David K

    Li, Cheng-Lun and Buyuktur, Ayse G. and Hutchful, David K. and Sant, Natasha B. and Nainwal, Satyendra K. , title =. CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =. doi:10.1145/1358628.1358946 , acmid =

    work page doi:10.1145/1358628.1358946

  28. [32]

    , title =

    Hollis, Billy S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

    work page 1999

  29. [33]

    Goossens, Michel and Rahtz, S. P. and Moore, Ross and Sutor, Robert S. , title =. 1999 , isbn =

    work page 1999

  30. [34]

    and Rosenberg, Arnold L

    Buss, Jonathan F. and Rosenberg, Arnold L. and Knott, Judson D. , title =. 1987 , source =

    work page 1987

  31. [35]

    CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =

    , note =. CHI '08: CHI '08 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems , year =

    work page

  32. [36]

    Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry) , year =

    Clarkson, Kenneth Lee , advisor =. Algorithms for Closest-Point Problems (Computational Geometry) , year =

    work page

  33. [37]

    SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev. , year =

    work page

  34. [38]

    2004 , isbn =

    IEEE TCSC Executive Committee , booktitle =. 2004 , isbn =. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICWS.2004.64 , acmid =

    work page doi:10.1109/icws.2004.64 2004

  35. [39]

    Distributed systems (2nd Ed.) , year =

    work page

  36. [40]

    , title =

    Petrie, Charles J. , title =. 1986 , source =

    work page 1986

  37. [41]

    Donald E. Knuth. Seminumerical Algorithms. 1981

    work page 1981

  38. [42]

    E-commerce and cultural values , year =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , Title =. E-commerce and cultural values , year =

    work page

  39. [43]

    E-commerce and cultural values , year =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , type =. E-commerce and cultural values , year =

    work page

  40. [44]

    Chapter 9 , booktitle =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. Chapter 9 , booktitle =. 2002 , address =

    work page 2002

  41. [45]

    E-commerce and cultural values , editor =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , title =. E-commerce and cultural values , editor =. 2003 , isbn =

    work page 2003

  42. [46]

    E-commerce and cultural values - (InBook-num-in-chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values - (InBook-num-in-chap) , chapter =. 2004 , address =

    work page 2004

  43. [47]

    E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-text-in-chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-text-in-chap) , chapter =. 2005 , address =

    work page 2005

  44. [48]

    E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-num chap) , chapter =

    Kong, Wei-Chang , editor =. E-commerce and cultural values (Inbook-num chap) , chapter =. 2006 , address =

    work page 2006

  45. [49]

    Microelectron

    Mehdi Saeedi and Morteza Saheb Zamani and Mehdi Sedighi , title =. Microelectron. J. , volume =. 2010 , pages =

    work page 2010

  46. [50]

    Mehdi Saeedi and Morteza Saheb Zamani and Mehdi Sedighi and Zahra Sasanian , title =. J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst. , volume =

    work page

  47. [51]

    Kirschmer, Markus and Voight, John , title =. SIAM J. Comput. , issue_date =. 2010 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1137/080734467 , acmid =

    work page doi:10.1137/080734467 2010

  48. [52]

    Hoare, C. A. R. , title =. Structured programming (incoll) , editor =. 1972 , isbn =

    work page 1972

  49. [53]

    History of programming languages I (incoll) , editor =

    Lee, Jan , title =. History of programming languages I (incoll) , editor =. 1981 , isbn =. doi:http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800025.1198348 , acmid =

    work page doi:10.1145/800025.1198348 1981

  50. [54]

    , title =

    Dijkstra, E. , title =. Classics in software engineering (incoll) , year =

    work page

  51. [55]

    , title =

    Wenzel, Elizabeth M. , title =. Multimedia interface design (incoll) , year =. doi:10.1145/146022.146089 , acmid =

    work page doi:10.1145/146022.146089

  52. [56]

    , title =

    Mumford, E. , title =. Critical issues in information systems research (incoll) , year =

    work page

  53. [57]

    and Golden, Donald G

    McCracken, Daniel D. and Golden, Donald G. , title =. 1990 , isbn =

    work page 1990

  54. [58]

    The analysis of linear partial differential operators

    H. The analysis of linear partial differential operators. 1985 , PAGES =

    work page 1985

  55. [59]

    IEEE", address =

    A. Adya and P. Bahl and J. Padhye and A.Wolman and L. Zhou , title =. Proceedings of the IEEE 1st International Conference on Broadnets Networks (BroadNets'04) , publisher = "IEEE", address = "Los Alamitos, CA", year =

    work page

  56. [60]

    I. F. Akyildiz and W. Su and Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci , title =. Comm. ACM , volume = 38, number = "4", year =

    work page

  57. [61]

    I. F. Akyildiz and T. Melodia and K. R. Chowdhury , title =. Computer Netw. , volume = 51, number = "4", year =

    work page

  58. [62]

    ACM", address =

    P. Bahl and R. Chancre and J. Dungeon , title =. Proceeding of the 10th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom'04) , publisher = "ACM", address = "New York, NY", year =

    work page

  59. [63]

    8 (Special Issue on Sensor Networks)

    D. Culler and D. Estrin and M. Srivastava , title =. IEEE Comput. , volume = 37, number = "8 (Special Issue on Sensor Networks)", publisher = "IEEE", address = "Los Alamitos, CA", year =

    work page

  60. [64]

    Natarajan and M

    A. Natarajan and M. Motani and B. de Silva and K. Yap and K. C. Chua , title =. Network Architectures , editor =. 960935712

    work page

  61. [65]

    Tzamaloukas and J

    A. Tzamaloukas and J. J. Garcia-Luna-Aceves , title =

    work page

  62. [66]

    Zhou and J

    G. Zhou and J. Lu and C.-Y. Wan and M. D. Yarvis and J. A. Stankovic , title =

    work page

  63. [67]

    Mapping Powerlists onto Hypercubes

    Jacob Kornerup. Mapping Powerlists onto Hypercubes. 1994

    work page 1994

  64. [68]

    Automatic Parallelization for Distributed-Memory Multiprocessing Systems

    Michael Gerndt. Automatic Parallelization for Distributed-Memory Multiprocessing Systems

    work page

  65. [69]

    J. E. Archer, Jr. and R. Conway and F. B. Schneider. User recovery and reversal in interactive systems. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

    work page

  66. [70]

    D. D. Dunlop and V. R. Basili. Generalizing specifications for uniformly implemented loops. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

    work page

  67. [71]

    Heering and P

    J. Heering and P. Klint. Towards monolingual programming environments. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

    work page

  68. [72]

    Donald E. Knuth. The book

    work page

  69. [73]

    Korach and D

    E. Korach and D. Rotem and N. Santoro. Distributed algorithms for finding centers and medians in networks. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

    work page

  70. [74]

    : A Document Preparation System

    Leslie Lamport. : A Document Preparation System

    work page

  71. [75]

    F. Nielson. Program transformations in a denotational setting. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst

    work page

  72. [76]

    Brian K. Reid. A high-level approach to computer document formatting. Proceedings of the 7th Annual Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages

    work page

  73. [77]

    and Abdelzaher, Tarek F

    Zhou, Gang and Wu, Yafeng and Yan, Ting and He, Tian and Huang, Chengdu and Stankovic, John A. and Abdelzaher, Tarek F. , title =. ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. , issue_date =. doi:10.1145/1721695.1721705 , acmid = 1721705, publisher =

    work page doi:10.1145/1721695.1721705

  74. [78]

    Institutional members of the Users Group

    work page

  75. [79]

    Boris Veytsman , title =

    work page

  76. [80]

    and Peterson, Larry L

    Bowman, Mic and Debray, Saumya K. and Peterson, Larry L. , title =. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    work page 1993

  77. [81]

    TUGboat , volume =

    Braams, Johannes , title =. TUGboat , volume =

    work page

  78. [82]

    Post Congress Tristesse

    Malcolm Clark. Post Congress Tristesse. TeX90 Conference Proceedings

    work page

  79. [83]

    ACM Trans

    Herlihy, Maurice , title =. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. , volume =. 1993 , doi =

    work page 1993

  80. [84]

    Salas and Einar Hille

    S.L. Salas and Einar Hille. Calculus: One and Several Variable. 1978

    work page 1978

Showing first 80 references.