arxiv: 2605.09796 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-10 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

When Sounds Hurt and Voices Aren't Heard: An Experience Report on Misophonia, Sensory Trauma, and Trauma-Informed Design

Tawfiq Ammari

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 06:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC

keywords misophoniatrauma-informed designsensory traumaepistemic harmhuman-computer interactiondigital platformsonline communitiesexperience report

0 comments

The pith

Trauma-informed design must treat misophonia as ongoing sensory harm from sounds and visuals plus epistemic harm from repeated dismissal of people's accounts.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper is an experience report written by a researcher who lives with misophonia, a strong aversive reaction to common sounds such as chewing or pen clicking and often to matching visual cues. It re-reads a prior set of sixteen interviews through the lens of the author's own experience and involvement in a misophonia research network. The central argument is that digital platforms turn everyday audiovisual surfaces into recurring distress while social disbelief adds a second layer of harm by invalidating users' bodily reports. Trauma-informed design therefore needs to address both the sensory triggers built into interfaces and the epistemic dismissal that occurs in both public spaces and moderated online groups. The report closes by pointing to concrete implications for accessible technology design.

Core claim

The author states that trauma-informed design must treat embodied, contested conditions such as misophonia as sources of both sensory and epistemic harm: ongoing trauma produced by the audiovisual surface of platforms and by repeated dismissal of users' accounts of their bodies. This dual framing is drawn from re-reading the sixteen interviews in dialogue with personal experience, and it highlights how even closed supportive communities can reproduce dismissal when moderators decide whose experiences count.

What carries the argument

The dual-harm extension of trauma-informed design that links sensory distress from platform surfaces with epistemic harm from disbelief of bodily accounts.

If this is right

Platform features such as auto-playing audio and normalized eating videos must be redesigned to reduce recurring sensory triggers for misophonia.
Design processes should validate users' reports of bodily distress without requiring external clinical proof.
Moderated online groups and subreddits need safeguards so that a small number of moderators cannot dismiss valid experiences.
Accessible technology work, including at ASSETS, must incorporate both sensory mitigation and recognition of epistemic harm.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same dual-harm lens could be tested on other contested sensory conditions such as certain visual sensitivities or auditory processing differences.
Design evaluations might add measures of whether users feel their accounts of their bodies are taken seriously as an outcome variable.
The argument connects to wider questions about how digital environments can turn ordinary sensory input into chronic stress for multiple user groups.

Load-bearing premise

The author's personal lived experience together with a re-reading of the sixteen prior interviews is sufficient to extend the trauma-informed design framework.

What would settle it

A larger, independent study of people with misophonia that finds platform changes addressing only sensory triggers fully resolve distress without any need to address epistemic dismissal would falsify the claim that both forms of harm must be treated together.

read the original abstract

This experience report reflects on researching misophonia as someone who lives with it. Misophonia is an aversive response to everyday sounds (chewing, sniffling, pen clicking) and, for many of us, to associated visual cues (misokinesia). It is poorly recognized clinically and socially. People with misophonia are routinely disbelieved, and they live inside platform surfaces (auto-playing audio, algorithmic ASMR, normalized eating on camera) that turn the sensory environment itself into recurring distress. This report is a re-reading of a prior qualitative study of 16 semi-structured interviews with misophones, conducted in dialogue with my lived experience and my role in the soQuiet Misophonia Research Network. I extend the trauma-informed design (TID) conversation in two ways. First, TID must treat embodied, contested conditions as sources of both sensory and epistemic harm: ongoing trauma produced by the audiovisual surface and by repeated dismissal of users' accounts of their bodies. Second, the closed groups and moderated subreddits participants relied on can reproduce that dismissal when a few moderators decide whose experiences count. I close with implications for ASSETS.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

read the letter

This experience report extends trauma-informed design to misophonia by framing platform surfaces as sources of both sensory distress and epistemic dismissal, grounded in the author's lived experience plus a re-reading of prior interviews. The author links everyday features like auto-playing audio and visible eating content to recurring harm, then notes how disbelief from others compounds it, including inside some closed support communities where moderators control whose accounts count. That two-way extension is the main new angle, and it stays consistent with the experience-report genre. The concrete examples from the re-read interviews and the author's role in the soQuiet network give the piece some grounding without overclaiming. The closing implications for ASSETS are brief but point toward practical design adjustments. The soft spot is the absence of new data collection or formal analysis methods. Everything rests on reflective synthesis of existing interviews and personal experience, which fits the format but keeps the contribution at the level of conceptual suggestion rather than tested extension. Scope stays narrow to one condition, so broader claims about TID would need more work. This is for HCI researchers already working on accessibility, sensory sensitivities, or trauma-informed approaches. A reader in that niche would get a useful prompt for thinking about epistemic harm alongside physical triggers. I would send it to peer review. It is a legitimate piece in its category and raises points worth community discussion even if the evidence base remains reflective.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. This experience report reflects on the author's lived experience with misophonia while re-reading a prior qualitative study of 16 semi-structured interviews. It extends the trauma-informed design (TID) framework by arguing that embodied, contested conditions produce both sensory harm (via platform audiovisual surfaces such as auto-playing audio, algorithmic ASMR, and normalized eating content) and epistemic harm (via repeated social and clinical dismissal of users' accounts of their bodies). The report further observes that closed online communities and moderated subreddits can reproduce this dismissal when moderators gatekeep whose experiences count, and closes with implications for the ASSETS conference.

Significance. If the reflective synthesis holds, the paper contributes to HCI accessibility and trauma-informed design research by foregrounding how digital interfaces can generate ongoing trauma for people with poorly recognized sensory conditions. It integrates sensory and epistemic dimensions of harm and models a reflexive use of personal experience alongside prior interview data, which is appropriate to the experience-report genre. This strengthens calls for design approaches that treat user bodily accounts as valid rather than contested.

minor comments (2)

The description of the re-reading process (how the author's lived experience was brought into dialogue with the 16 interviews) is brief; adding a short paragraph on the analytical approach or themes revisited would strengthen transparency without altering the genre.
The implications section for ASSETS could include one or two concrete examples of audiovisual platform features (e.g., auto-play defaults or ASMR recommendations) and how TID principles might be applied to them.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our experience report, for recognizing its contribution to integrating sensory and epistemic dimensions of harm within trauma-informed design, and for the recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is an experience report whose central claim is a reflective extension of trauma-informed design based on the author's lived experience with misophonia combined with re-reading of 16 prior interviews. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, predictions, or mathematical structures exist. The argument does not reduce any claim to its inputs by construction, nor does it rely on self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes that would create circularity. The derivation chain is self-contained within the stated genre of personal reflection and qualitative synthesis, with no load-bearing steps that exhibit the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard qualitative HCI assumptions that lived experience and re-interpretation of interviews constitute valid sources for framework extension.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Lived experience provides valid epistemic insight into sensory conditions
Invoked through the re-reading of interviews in dialogue with the author's own experience.
domain assumption Qualitative interviews can be re-interpreted to extend existing design frameworks
Basis for the two extensions to trauma-informed design.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5507 in / 1227 out tokens · 68557 ms · 2026-05-13T06:55:14.096573+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear
This experience report reflects on researching misophonia... extend the trauma-informed design (TID) conversation in two ways... sensory and epistemic harm
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
re-reading of a prior qualitative study of 16 semi-structured interviews

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages

[1]

Tawfiq Ammari and Samantha Gilgan. 2026. Remote Triggers: Misophonia, Technology Non-Use, and Design for Inclusive Digital Spaces.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.13355(2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[2]

Tawfiq Ammari, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Daniel Romero. 2019. Self-Declared Throwaway Accounts on Reddit: How Platform Affordances and Shared Norms Enable Parenting Disclosure and Support.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, CSCW, Article 135 (nov 2019), 30 pages. doi:10.1145/3359237

work page doi:10.1145/3359237 2019
[3]

Nazanin Andalibi. 2017. Self-disclosure and Response Behaviors in Socially Stigmatized Contexts on Social Media: The Case of Miscarriage. InProceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 248–253. doi:10.1145/3027063.3027137

work page doi:10.1145/3027063.3027137 2017
[4]

Nazanin Andalibi. 2019. What Happens After Disclosing Stigmatized Experiences on Identified Social Media: Individual, Dyadic, and Social/Network Outcomes. InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Glasgow, Scotland Uk)(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1â€“15. doi:10. 1145/3290605.3300367

work page arXiv 2019
[5]

Nazanin Andalibi and Andrea Forte. 2018. Responding to Sensitive Disclosures on Social Media: A Decision-Making Framework.ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)25, 6 (2018), 31

work page 2018
[6]

Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte

Nazanin Andalibi, Oliver L. Haimson, Munmun De Choudhury, and Andrea Forte. 2016. Understanding Social Media Disclosures of Sexual Abuse Through the Lenses of Support Seeking and Anonymity. InProceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3906–3918. doi:10.1145/2858036.2858096

work page doi:10.1145/2858036.2858096 2016
[7]

Social" in

Philip Baillargeon, Jina Yoon, and Amy Zhang. 2025. Who Puts the "Social" in "Social Computing"?: Using A Neurodi- versity Framing to Review Social Computing Research.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.9, 2, Article CSCW208 (May 2025), 44 pages. doi:10.1145/3711106

work page doi:10.1145/3711106 2025
[8]

Baumer, Phil Adams, Vera D

Eric P.S. Baumer, Phil Adams, Vera D. Khovanskaya, Tony C. Liao, Madeline E. Smith, Victoria Schwanda Sosik, and Kaiton Williams. 2013. Limiting, leaving, and (re)lapsing: an exploration of facebook non-use practices and experiences. InProceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Paris, France)(CHI ’13). Association for Compu...

work page doi:10.1145/2470654.2466446 2013
[9]

Baumer, Morgan G

Eric P.S. Baumer, Morgan G. Ames, Jed R. Brubaker, Jenna Burrell, and Paul Dourish. 2014. Refusing, limiting, departing: why we should study technology non-use. InCHI ’14 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Toronto, Ontario, Canada)(CHI EA ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 65–68. doi:10.1145/2559206.2559224

work page doi:10.1145/2559206.2559224 2014
[10]

Bennett and Daniela K

Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the "Other". InProceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Glasgow, Scotland Uk)(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. doi:10.1145/3290605.3300528

work page doi:10.1145/3290605.3300528 2019
[11]

Himani Bhakuni and Seye Abimbola. 2021. Epistemic injustice in academic global health.The Lancet Global Health9, 10 (Oct. 2021), e1465–e1470. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(21)00301-6 Publisher: Elsevier

work page doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00301-6 2021
[12]

Branham and Shaun K

Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces. InProceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility(Lisbon, Portugal)(ASSETS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163–171. doi:10.1145/270064...

work page doi:10.1145/2700648.2809864 2015
[13]

Havi Carel and Ian James Kidd. 2014. Epistemic injustice in healthcare: a philosophial analysis.Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy17, 4 (2014), 529–540

work page 2014
[14]

Havi Carel and Ian James Kidd. 2017. Epistemic injustice in medicine and healthcare. InThe Routledge handbook of epistemic injustice. Routledge, 336–346

work page 2017
[15]

Andrea E Cavanna and Stefano Seri. 2015. Misophonia: current perspectives.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment (2015), 2117–2123

work page 2015
[16]

Chen, Allison McDonald, Yixin Zou, Emily Tseng, Kevin A Roundy, Acar Tamersoy, Florian Schaub, Thomas Ristenpart, and Nicola Dell

Janet X. Chen, Allison McDonald, Yixin Zou, Emily Tseng, Kevin A Roundy, Acar Tamersoy, Florian Schaub, Thomas Ristenpart, and Nicola Dell. 2022. Trauma-Informed Computing: Towards Safer Technology Experiences for All. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(New Orleans, LA, USA)(CHI ’22). Association for Computing ...

work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3517475 2022
[17]

Ringland, and Anne Marie Piper

Maitraye Das, John Tang, Kathryn E. Ringland, and Anne Marie Piper. 2021. Towards Accessible Remote Work: Understanding Work-from-Home Practices of Neurodivergent Professionals.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.5, CSCW1, Article 183 (apr 2021), 30 pages. doi:10.1145/3449282

work page doi:10.1145/3449282 2021
[18]

2007.Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing

Miranda Fricker. 2007.Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Clarendon Press. Google-Books-ID: lncSDAAAQBAJ

work page 2007
[19]

Nanna Gorm and Irina Shklovski. 2019. Episodic use: Practices of care in self-tracking.New Media & Society21, 11-12 (2019), 2505–2521

work page 2019
[20]

Megan Hofmann, Devva Kasnitz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia L Bennett. 2020. Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design. InProceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Virtual Event, Greece)(ASSETS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 13 pages. ...

work page doi:10.1145/3373625.3416996 2020
[21]

Sumeet M Jaswal, Andreas KF De Bleser, and Todd C Handy. 2021. Misokinesia is a sensitivity to seeing others fidget that is prevalent in the general population.Scientific reports11, 1 (2021), 17204

work page 2021
[22]

Lucy Jiang, Woojin Ko, Shirley Yuan, Tanisha Shende, and Shiri Azenkot. 2025. Shifting the Focus: Exploring Video Accessibility Strategies and Challenges for People with ADHD. InProceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 561, 16 pages. doi:10.1145/...

work page doi:10.1145/3706598.3713637 2025
[23]

Ian James Kidd and Havi Carel. 2017. Epistemic injustice and illness.Journal of applied philosophy34, 2 (2017), 172–190

work page 2017
[24]

Jingjin Li, Shaomei Wu, and Gilly Leshed. 2024. Re-envisioning Remote Meetings: Co-designing Inclusive and Empowering Videoconferencing with People Who Stutter. InProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference(Copenhagen, Denmark)(DIS ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1926–1941. doi:10.1145/3643834.3661533

work page doi:10.1145/3643834.3661533 2024
[25]

Accessibility Research

Kelly Mack, Emma McDonnell, Dhruv Jain, Lucy Lu Wang, Jon E. Froehlich, and Leah Findlater. 2021. What Do We Mean by “Accessibility Research”? A Literature Survey of Accessibility Papers in CHI and ASSETS from 1994 to

work page 2021
[26]

Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 371, 18 pages

InProceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Yokohama, Japan)(CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 371, 18 pages. doi:10.1145/3411764.3445412

work page doi:10.1145/3411764.3445412 2021
[27]

Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz

Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. InProceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. doi:10.1145/1878803.1878807

work page doi:10.1145/1878803.1878807 2010
[28]

Rachel McKinnon. 2016. Epistemic injustice.Philosophy Compass11, 8 (2016), 437–446

work page 2016
[29]

Kharnita Mohamed. 2024. Debilitating Research: Scholarship of the Obvious and Epistemic Trauma.African Studies 83, 2-3 (2024), 134–151

work page 2024
[30]

Alexandre Nevsky, Filip Bircanin, Elena Simperl, Madeline N Cruice, and Timothy Neate. 2025. To Each Their Own: Exploring Highly Personalised Audiovisual Media Accessibility Interventions with People with Aphasia. InProceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1826–...

work page doi:10.1145/3715336.3735771 2025
[31]

Karen Newbigging and Julie Ridley. 2018. Epistemic struggles: The role of advocacy in promoting epistemic justice and rights in mental health.Social Science & Medicine219 (2018), 36–44

work page 2018
[32]

Iskra Potgieter, Carol MacDonald, Lucy Partridge, Rilana Cima, Jacqueline Sheldrake, and Derek J Hoare. 2019. Misophonia: A scoping review of research.Journal of clinical psychology75, 7 (2019), 1203–1218

work page 2019
[33]

Rebecca Poulsen, Z Williams, Patrick Dwyer, E Pellicano, Paul F Sowman, and David McAlpine. 2024. How auditory processing influences the autistic profile: A review.Autism Research17, 12 (2024), 2452–2470

work page 2024
[34]

Lauren Race, Amber James, Andrew Hayward, Kia El-Amin, Maya Gold Patterson, and Theresa Mershon. 2021. Designing Sensory and Social Tools for Neurodivergent Individuals in Social Media Environments. InProceedings of the 23rd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Virtual Event, USA)(ASSETS ’21). Association for Computing Mac...

work page doi:10.1145/3441852.3476546 2021
[35]

If Someone Downvoted My Posts—That’d Be the End of the World

Casey Randazzo and Tawfiq Ammari. 2023. “If Someone Downvoted My Posts—That’d Be the End of the World”: Designing Safer Online Spaces for Trauma Survivors. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany)(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 481, 18 pages. doi:10.1145/354...

work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581453 2023
[36]

Casey Randazzo and Tawfiq Ammari. 2025. Kintsugi-Inspired Design: Communicatively Reconstructing Identities Online After Trauma.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.9, 7, Article CSCW326 (Oct. 2025), 31 pages. doi:10.1145/3757507

work page doi:10.1145/3757507 2025
[37]

Scott, Rosanna Bellini, Tawfiq Ammari, Michael Ann Devito, Bryan Semaan, and Nazanin Andalibi

Casey Randazzo, Carol F. Scott, Rosanna Bellini, Tawfiq Ammari, Michael Ann Devito, Bryan Semaan, and Nazanin Andalibi. 2023. Trauma-Informed Design: A Collaborative Approach to Building Safer Online Spaces. InCompanion Publication of the 2023 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing(Minneapolis, MN, USA)(CSCW ’23 Companion)....

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

Elena Sabinson. 2025. Blowfish Band: A Wearable Inflatable Fidget for Self-Stimulatory (Stim) Behaviors. InProceedings of the 2025 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–0. doi:10.1145/3715336.3735442

work page doi:10.1145/3715336.3735442 2025
[40]

Antti Salovaara, Sacha Helfenstein, and Antti Oulasvirta. 2011. Everyday appropriations of information technology: A study of creative uses of digital cameras.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology62, 12 (2011), 2347–2363

work page 2011
[41]

Arjan Schröder, Nienke Vulink, and Damiaan Denys. 2013. Misophonia: diagnostic criteria for a new psychiatric disorder.PloS one8, 1 (2013), e54706

work page 2013
[42]

Carol F Scott, Gabriela Marcu, Riana Elyse Anderson, Mark W Newman, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2023. Trauma- Informed Social Media: Towards Solutions for Reducing and Healing Online Harm. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Hamburg, Germany)(CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3...

work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581512 2023
[43]

soQuiet Misophonia Advocacy. 2024. Misophonia Research Network. https://www.soquiet.org/mrn. Accessed: 2026-05-10

work page 2024
[44]

soQuiet Misophonia Advocacy. 2024. Tawfiq Ammari, PhD. https://www.soquiet.org/tawfiq-ammari-phd. Accessed: 2026-05-10. Researcher profile, soQuiet Misophonia Research Network

work page 2024
[45]

Knut H Sørensen. 2006. Domestication: the enactment of technology.Domestication of media and technology46 (2006)

work page 2006
[46]

Bennett, Emeline Brulé, Rua M

Katta Spiel, Kathrin Gerling, Cynthia L. Bennett, Emeline Brulé, Rua M. Williams, Jennifer Rode, and Jennifer Mankoff

work page
[47]

InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA)(CHI EA ’20)

Nothing About Us Without Us: Investigating the Role of Critical Disability Studies in HCI. InExtended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA)(CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. doi:10.1145/3334480.3375150

work page doi:10.1145/3334480.3375150 2020
[48]

2018.Trauma and the Credibility Economy: An Analysis of Epistemic Violence and Its Traumatic Functions

Gina Stinnett. 2018.Trauma and the Credibility Economy: An Analysis of Epistemic Violence and Its Traumatic Functions. Illinois State University

work page 2018
[49]

Susan E Swedo, David M Baguley, Damiaan Denys, Laura J Dixon, Mercede Erfanian, Alessandra Fioretti, Pawel J Jastreboff, Sukhbinder Kumar, M Zachary Rosenthal, Romke Rouw, et al. 2022. Consensus definition of misophonia: a delphi study.Frontiers in Neuroscience16 (2022), 841816

work page 2022
[50]

Steven Taylor. 2017. Misophonia: A new mental disorder?Medical Hypotheses103 (2017), 109–117

work page 2017
[51]

Annuska Zolyomi and Jaime Snyder. 2021. Social-Emotional-Sensory Design Map for Affective Computing Informed by Neurodivergent Experiences.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.5, CSCW1, Article 77 (April 2021), 37 pages. doi:10.1145/3449151 , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: May 2026

work page doi:10.1145/3449151 2021