pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10103 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Cyclotron Line Variability and Accretion Dynamics in Vela X-1

Mohammed Tobrej , Binay Rai , Manoj Ghising , Bikash Chandra Paul
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords Vela X-1cyclotron resonant scattering featuresCRSFaccretion columnX-ray pulsarNuSTARmagnetic field
0
0 comments X

The pith

The harmonic cyclotron line in Vela X-1 shows no long-term decay and deviates from an energy ratio of two with the fundamental line.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines two new NuSTAR pointings of Vela X-1 with four earlier observations to track the behavior of its cyclotron resonant scattering features over eight years. It reports that the harmonic line energy does not follow the steady decline claimed in prior work and that the fundamental line energy changes irregularly with no single direction. The measured ratio of harmonic to fundamental energies falls away from the value of two, which would hold if both lines formed at the same location. Pulse-profile and spectral analysis further shows no CRSF-luminosity link but clear anti-correlations of photon index and folding energy with flux, consistent with sub-critical accretion and stronger Comptonization at higher rates.

Core claim

Long-term NuSTAR monitoring reveals that the harmonic CRSF energy in Vela X-1 does not exhibit the monotonic decay previously reported, while the fundamental CRSF energy evolves irregularly without a clear trend. The harmonic-to-fundamental energy ratio departs from the canonical value of two, indicating that the two line-forming regions lie at different heights inside the accretion column. No significant correlation appears between CRSF energies and luminosity, yet the photon index and folding energy show anti-correlations with flux that match expectations for sub-critical accretion accompanied by increased Compton scattering.

What carries the argument

Cyclotron resonant scattering features (CRSFs), absorption lines produced when photons scatter off electrons whose cyclotron frequency matches the photon energy, used to map magnetic-field strength and vertical structure inside the accretion column.

If this is right

  • The accretion column must contain vertically separated layers where the fundamental and harmonic lines form under different physical conditions.
  • Magnetic-field strength inferred from the fundamental line alone requires correction for possible height offset when the ratio deviates from two.
  • Spectral hardening at lower flux supports sub-critical accretion in which radiation pressure does not reverse the inflow and Comptonization increases with mass-accretion rate.
  • Continued monitoring with sensitive X-ray telescopes can reveal whether the irregular line-energy changes recur on orbital or super-orbital timescales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed height separation may imply a vertical gradient in magnetic-field strength or plasma temperature that single-zone models do not capture.
  • Similar non-canonical ratios in other high-mass X-ray binaries could be checked to test whether layered line formation is common under sub-critical conditions.
  • The irregular evolution pattern might be compared with simultaneous optical or radio data to search for links to changes in the stellar wind or disk structure.

Load-bearing premise

The observed absorption features are correctly identified as the fundamental and first-harmonic CRSFs and the reported absence of CRSF-luminosity correlation is not produced by limited sampling or incomplete modeling of accretion states.

What would settle it

A new high-quality observation that shows a steady, monotonic decline in harmonic CRSF energy across additional years or a consistent energy ratio of exactly two would falsify the claimed lack of long-term decay and height separation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10103 by Bikash Chandra Paul, Binay Rai, Manoj Ghising, Mohammed Tobrej.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Pulse profile of Vela X-1 in the 3–79 keV band obtained from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Energy-resolved pulse profiles of Vela X-1 for Observation I (left) and Observation II (right). Each panel corresponds to a di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Pulse fraction versus photon energy for Observations I and II (top), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pulse fraction versus flux for all six NuSTAR observations (2012– 2020) in 3–79 keV range. A moderate decreasing trend is evident (r=-0.6), consistent with enhanced unpulsed emission at higher accretion rates. spectra are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: NuSTAR spectra of Vela X-1 (FPMA: black, FPMB: red) in the 3–79 keV range. Top: unfolded spectra. Middle: residuals without CRSF components. Bottom: residuals after including Gaussian absorption lines (GABS). Spectra are rebinned for representation. 53000 54000 55000 56000 57000 58000 59000 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 Time (MJD) La Parola et al. (2016) Furst et al. (2014) Diez et al. (2022) Liu et al. (2… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Flux dependence of CRSF harmonic parameters: line centroid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Dependence of (left) photon index and (right) folding energy on flux. Errors are at the 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Long-term evolution of CRSF energies in Vela X-1. Left: harmonic centroid energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Variation of cyclotron line parameters (energy, width and strength in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Ratio of harmonic to fundamental CRSF energies, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive analysis of Vela X-1 using two new NuSTAR observations, placed in the context of four earlier datasets obtained between 2012 and 2020. The energy-resolved pulse profiles demonstrate a significant transformation from an asymmetric structure at low energies to distinct double peaks above 12 keV, whereas the pulse fraction escalates with photon energy but decreases with flux. Broadband spectra validate the Fe K alpha emission line and disclose both fundamental and harmonic cyclotron resonant scattering characteristics (CRSF). We observe no substantial link between CRSF energies and luminosity, contrary to previous findings; rather, the photon index and folding energy demonstrate distinct anti-correlations with flux, aligning with sub-critical accretion and increased Comptonization in the accretion column. Our results provide the first clear evidence that the harmonic CRSF in Vela X-1 does not follow the long-term decay previously claimed. The fundamental line energy also displays an irregular evolution, without a clear monotonic trend. Notably, the harmonic-to-fundamental energy ratio departs from the canonical value of two, suggesting that the line-forming regions are located at different heights within the accretion column. These results provide new constraints on the accretion geometry and magnetic field topology of Vela X-1, highlighting the importance of continued monitoring with current and future X-ray observatories.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes two new NuSTAR observations of Vela X-1 together with four archival datasets (2012–2020), reporting energy-resolved pulse profiles that evolve from asymmetric at low energies to double-peaked above 12 keV, increasing pulse fraction with energy but decreasing with flux, and broadband spectra showing Fe Kα plus both fundamental (~25 keV) and harmonic (~50 keV) CRSFs. The central claims are the absence of any CRSF-energy–luminosity correlation (contrary to prior work), anti-correlations of photon index and folding energy with flux consistent with sub-critical accretion, no long-term secular decay in the harmonic CRSF energy, irregular evolution of the fundamental, and a harmonic-to-fundamental ratio departing from 2, implying line formation at different heights in the accretion column.

Significance. If the CRSF centroid measurements prove robust, the results supply new observational constraints on accretion-column geometry and magnetic-field structure in a persistent wind-fed pulsar, directly challenging earlier reports of long-term harmonic decay and underscoring the value of repeated broadband monitoring.

major comments (2)
  1. [spectral analysis and results] The central claims of no CRSF–luminosity correlation, absence of long-term harmonic decay, and departure of the energy ratio from 2 all rest on the measured line centroids. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the harmonic feature near 50 keV—located where NuSTAR effective area declines and continuum curvature is strongest—has been tested against plausible variations in the cutoff power-law or Comptonization parameters (photon index and folding energy). The reported anti-correlations of these same continuum parameters with flux raise the possibility of a degeneracy that could shift the apparent harmonic centroid by several keV and thereby produce the claimed ratio offset and stability.
  2. [results and discussion] The abstract and results state that CRSF energies show “no substantial link” with luminosity and that the harmonic exhibits “no long-term decay,” yet the text supplies no quantitative details on the luminosity sampling, the exact statistical tests employed, or the error budgets on the line energies across the six epochs. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the null correlation is driven by limited dynamic range or by the modeling choices noted above.
minor comments (2)
  1. [timing analysis] The description of the pulse-profile evolution and pulse-fraction behavior would benefit from explicit reference to the energy bands and flux states used for each panel or table.
  2. [spectral analysis] Notation for the cyclotron line model (cyclabs, gabs, or other) and any frozen parameters should be stated explicitly in the spectral-fitting section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review of our manuscript on cyclotron line variability in Vela X-1. The comments highlight important aspects of spectral modeling robustness and statistical presentation that we will address to strengthen the paper. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [spectral analysis and results] The central claims of no CRSF–luminosity correlation, absence of long-term harmonic decay, and departure of the energy ratio from 2 all rest on the measured line centroids. The manuscript does not demonstrate that the harmonic feature near 50 keV—located where NuSTAR effective area declines and continuum curvature is strongest—has been tested against plausible variations in the cutoff power-law or Comptonization parameters (photon index and folding energy). The reported anti-correlations of these same continuum parameters with flux raise the possibility of a degeneracy that could shift the apparent harmonic centroid by several keV and thereby produce the claimed ratio offset and stability.

    Authors: We agree that explicit tests of continuum parameter variations are needed to confirm the stability of the harmonic CRSF centroid near 50 keV. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection presenting systematic fits in which the photon index and folding energy are stepped across their 90% confidence ranges (while holding other parameters fixed) and the resulting shifts in the harmonic line energy are quantified. These tests will be shown for all six epochs and will directly address whether the reported energy ratio and lack of secular decay remain robust. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [results and discussion] The abstract and results state that CRSF energies show “no substantial link” with luminosity and that the harmonic exhibits “no long-term decay,” yet the text supplies no quantitative details on the luminosity sampling, the exact statistical tests employed, or the error budgets on the line energies across the six epochs. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the null correlation is driven by limited dynamic range or by the modeling choices noted above.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current text lacks the quantitative details required for independent evaluation. In the revised version we will expand the results section with (i) a table of the 2–10 keV luminosities for each of the six observations, (ii) the Pearson correlation coefficients and associated p-values for CRSF energy versus luminosity, and (iii) the 1σ uncertainties on each fundamental and harmonic centroid. This addition will allow readers to judge the dynamic range and the statistical significance of the reported null correlation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results are direct observational measurements

full rationale

The paper performs spectral fitting on NuSTAR data to extract CRSF centroid energies, photon indices, and folding energies, then reports empirical correlations (or lack thereof) with flux and luminosity across epochs. No derivation chain exists in which a claimed result (e.g., ratio departure from 2 or absence of long-term decay) reduces by the paper's own equations or self-citations to a fitted parameter or prior assumption used as input. All central claims are falsifiable statements about measured quantities from independent datasets, with no self-definitional loops, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. This is standard observational astrophysics reporting.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is observational; spectral fitting implicitly involves free parameters such as photon index and folding energy that are adjusted to match the data, but no new physical entities or unstated theoretical axioms are introduced in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • photon index
    Fitted spectral parameter reported to anti-correlate with flux.
  • folding energy
    Fitted spectral parameter reported to anti-correlate with flux.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5541 in / 1378 out tokens · 47255 ms · 2026-05-12T03:24:01.296432+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (eds.) Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V

    Arnaud, K.A.: In: Jacoby, G.H., Barnes, J. (eds.) Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V. ASP Conf. Ser., vol. 101, p. 17 (1996)

    work page 1996

  2. [2]

    M., & Sunyaev, R

    Basko, M. M., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1976, MNRAS, 175, 395

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    A., & Wolff, M

    Becker, P. A., & Wolff, M. T. 2007, ApJ, 654, 435

    work page 2007

  4. [4]

    Becker P. A. et al., 2012, A& A, 544, A123

    work page 2012

  5. [5]

    M., 2002, ApJ, 566, 85

    Beloborodov A. M., 2002, ApJ, 566, 85

    work page 2002

  6. [6]

    A., Tsygankov S

    Boldin P. A., Tsygankov S. S., Lutovinov A. A., 2013, Astrophys. Let., 39, 375

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    1995, ApJ, 444, 405

    Bulik, T., Riffert, H., Meszaros, P., et al. 1995, ApJ, 444, 405

    work page 1995

  8. [8]

    A., Rothschild, R

    Coburn, W., Heindl, W. A., Rothschild, R. E., Gruber, D. E., Kreykenbohm, I., Wilms, J., Kretschmar, P., & Staubert, R., 2002, ApJ, 580, 394

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    H., Titarchuk L

    Cui W., Morgan E. H., Titarchuk L. G., 1998, ApJ, 504, L27

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    R., 1990, MNRAS, 244, 93

    Davies S. R., 1990, MNRAS, 244, 93

    work page 1990

  11. [11]

    P., 2005, A&A, 437, 657

    Dessart, L., & Owocki, S. P., 2005, A&A, 437, 657

    work page 2005

  12. [12]

    Diez C.M., Grinberg V., Furst F., Sokolova-Lapa E., Santangelo A., Wilms J., Pottschmidt K., 2022, A&A, 660, A19

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    M., Dupourqué, S., Zhou, M., Quintin, E., Matzeu, G

    Diez, C. M., Dupourqué, S., Zhou, M., Quintin, E., Matzeu, G. A., Fürst, F., Kretschmar, P., Amato, R., & Malacaria, C., 2025. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07258

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Ducci, L., Sidoli, L., Mereghetti, S., Paizis, A., & Romano, P., 2009, MNRAS, 398, 2152

    work page 2009

  15. [15]

    A., Segreto, A., Mineo, T., & Santangelo, A

    Ferrigno, C., Becker, P. A., Segreto, A., Mineo, T., & Santangelo, A. 2009, A & A, 498, 825

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Ferrigno C., D’Aì A., Ambrosi E., 2023, A&A, 677, A103

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Furst, F., et al., 2010, A&A, 519, A37

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Furst, F., et al., 2014, ApJ, 780, 133

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    2014a, ApJ, 784, L40

    Furst, F., Pottschmidt, K., Wilms, J., et al. 2014a, ApJ, 784, L40

    work page

  20. [20]

    2014b, ApJ, 784, L40

    Furst, F., Pottschmidt, K., Wilms, J., et al. 2014b, ApJ, 784, L40

    work page

  21. [21]

    2013, MNRAS, 431, 3216

    Gangopadhyay, T., Ray, S., Li, X.-D., Dey, J., & Dey, M. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 3216

    work page 2013

  22. [22]

    K., & Pant, N

    Gedela, S., Bisht, R. K., & Pant, N. 2019, Modern Physics Letters A, 34, 1950157

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    Grinberg, V., Hell, N., El Mellah, I., et al., 2017, A&A, 608, A1437

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    E., 1990, ApJ, 361, 225

    Haberl, F., & White, N. E., 1990, ApJ, 361, 225

    work page 1990

  25. [25]

    Harrison F.A. et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103

    work page 2013

  26. [26]

    Hemanth Manikantan, Biswajit Paul, Vikram Rana Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 526 (1) (2023), pp. 1-28

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    A., Werner, J., & Osmer, P., 1972, ApJ, 175, L19

    Hiltner, W. A., Werner, J., & Osmer, P., 1972, ApJ, 175, L19

    work page 1972

  28. [28]

    S., Bleeker J

    Kaastra J. S., Bleeker J. A. M., 2016, A&A, 587, A151

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    E., & Ferrigno, C

    Klochkov, D., Staubert, R., Santangelo, A., Rothschild, R. E., & Ferrigno, C. 2011, A&A, 532, A126

    work page 2011

  30. [30]

    E., 1997, AIP Conference Proceedings

    Kretschmar, P., Kreykenbohm, I., Staubert, R., Wilms, J., Maisack, M., Kendziorra, E., Grove, J. E., 1997, AIP Conference Proceedings

    work page 1997

  31. [31]

    2021, A&A, 652, A95

    Kretschmar, P., El Mellah, I., Martínez-Núñez, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A95

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    A., & Rothschild, R

    Kreykenbohm, I., Coburn, W., Wilms, J., Kretschmar, P., Staubert, R.,Heindl, W. A., & Rothschild, R. E., 2002, A&A, 395, 129

    work page 2002

  33. [33]

    2008, A&A, 492, 511

    Kreykenbohm, I., Wilms, J., Kretschmar, P., et al. 2008, A&A, 492, 511

    work page 2008

  34. [34]

    Madsen et al 2015 ApJS 220 8

    Kristin K. Madsen et al 2015 ApJS 220 8

    work page 2015

  35. [35]

    2003, A&A, 400, 993

    La Barbera, A., Santangelo, A., Orlandini, M., & Segreto, A. 2003, A&A, 400, 993

    work page 2003

  36. [36]

    Larsson S., 1996, A&A, 117, 197

    work page 1996

  37. [37]

    2016, MNRAS, 463, 185

    La Parola, V., Cusumano, G., Segreto, A., & D’Aì,A. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 185

    work page 2016

  38. [38]

    Leahy, D. A. 1991, MNRAS, 251, 203

    work page 1991

  39. [39]

    L Ji, R Staubert, L Ducci, A Santangelo, S Zhang, Z Chang, 2019, MNRAS, 484, 3

    work page 2019

  40. [40]

    Liu Q., Wang W., Chen X., Ding Y.Z., Lu F.J., Song L.M., Qu J.L., 2022, MNRAS, 514,

    work page 2022

  41. [41]

    1054, Cool Discs, Hot Flows: The Varying Faces of Accreting Compact Objects

    Lutovinov A., Tsygankov S., 2008, in Axelsson M., ed., American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 1054, Cool Discs, Hot Flows: The Varying Faces of Accreting Compact Objects. pp 191–202 (arXiv:0808.2034), doi:10.1063/1.3002502)

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3002502 2008

  42. [42]

    Lutovinov, A. A. & Tsygankov, S. S. 2009, Astronomy Letters, 35, 433

    work page 2009

  43. [43]

    A., Tsygankov S

    Lutovinov A. A., Tsygankov S. S., Postnov K. A., Krivonos R. A., Molkov S. V., Tomsick J. A., 2017, MNRAS, 466, 593

    work page 2017

  44. [44]

    Makishima, T

    K. Makishima, T. Mihara, F. Nagase, and Y. Tanaka , 1999, ApJ , 525 , 978

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    Martinez-Nunez, S., et al., 2013, A&A, 563, A70

    work page 2013

  46. [46]

    1992, High-Energy Radiation from Magnetized Neutron Stars (Chicago: Univ

    Meszaros, P. 1992, High-Energy Radiation from Magnetized Neutron Stars (Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press)

    work page 1992

  47. [47]

    A., Suleimanov V

    Mushtukov A. A., Suleimanov V. F., Tsygankov S. S., Poutanen J., 2015a, MNRAS, 447, 1847

    work page

  48. [48]

    1986, PASJ, 38, 547

    Nagase, F., Hayakawa, S., & Sato, N. 1986, PASJ, 38, 547

    work page 1986

  49. [49]

    Nishimura O., 2005, PASJ, 57, 769

    work page 2005

  50. [50]

    T., Watanabe, S., Takahashi, T., & Makishima, K., 2013, ApJ, 767, 70

    Odaka, H., Khangulyan, D., Tanaka, Y. T., Watanabe, S., Takahashi, T., & Makishima, K., 2013, ApJ, 767, 70

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    M., Feldmeier, A., & Kretschmar, P., 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2820

    Oskinova, L. M., Feldmeier, A., & Kretschmar, P., 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2820

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    P., Castor, J

    Owocki, S. P., Castor, J. I., & Rybicki, G. B., 1988, ApJ, 335, 914

    work page 1988

  53. [53]

    N., White, N

    Parmar, A. N., White, N. E., & Stella, L. 1989, ApJ, 338, 373

    work page 1989

  54. [54]

    K. A. Postnov, M. I. Gornostaev, D. Klochkov, E. Laplace, V. V. Lukin, N. I. Shakura, 2015, MNRAS, 452,

    work page 2015

  55. [55]

    J., Ash, T

    Quaintrell, H., Norton, A. J., Ash, T. D. C., et al. 2003, A&A, 401, 313

    work page 2003

  56. [56]

    & Nespoli, E., 2013, A & A, 332, 1-29

    Reig, P. & Nespoli, E., 2013, A & A, 332, 1-29

    work page 2013

  57. [57]

    E., Coburn, W., & Staubert, R., 2007, A&A, 472, 353

    Schonherr, G., Wilms, J., Kretschmar, P., Kreykenbohm, I., Santangelo, A.,Rothschild, R. E., Coburn, W., & Staubert, R., 2007, A&A, 472, 353

    work page 2007

  58. [58]

    W., Schonherr, G., Falkner, S., et al

    Schwarm, F. W., Schonherr, G., Falkner, S., et al. 2017b, A&A, 597, A3

    work page

  59. [59]

    I., Postnov, K., Wilms, J., Rothschild, R

    Staubert, R., Shakura, N. I., Postnov, K., Wilms, J., Rothschild, R. E.,Coburn, W., Rodina, L.,& Klochkov, D., 2007, A&A, 465, L25

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    S. V. Forsblom, 2023, arXiv:2303.01800 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Tanaka, Y., 1986, in Radiation Hydrodynamics in Stars and Compact Objects, ed. D. Mihalas, K.-H. A. Winkler, Vol. 255

    work page 1986

  62. [62]

    S., Lutovinov, A

    Tsygankov, S. S., Lutovinov, A. A., Churazov, E. M., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 19

    work page 2006

  63. [63]

    Tamang R., Ghising M., Tobrej M., Rai B., Paul B.C., 2022, MNRAS, 515, 5407

    work page 2022

  64. [64]

    S., Lutovinov A

    Tsygankov S. S., Lutovinov A. A., Churazov E. M., Sunyaev R. A., 2007, Astronomy Letters, 33, 368

    work page 2007

  65. [65]

    S., Lutovinov A

    Tsygankov S. S., Lutovinov A. A., Serber A. V., 2010, MNRAS, 401, 1628

    work page 2010

  66. [66]

    H., van Paradijs, J., Zuiderwijk, E

    van Kerkwijk, M. H., van Paradijs, J., Zuiderwijk, E. J., Hammerschlag-Hensberge, G., Kaper, L.,& Sterken, C., 1995, A&A, 303, 483

    work page 1995

  67. [67]

    A., Ferland, G

    Verner, D. A., Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., & Yakovlev, D. G., 1996, ApJ, 465, 487

    work page 1996

  68. [68]

    Wang, Y., & Welter, G. L. 1981, A & A, 102, 97

    work page 1981

  69. [69]

    Wilms J., Allen A., McCray R., 2000, ApJ, 542, 914

    work page 2000

  70. [70]

    2015, , 579, A101

    Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, , 579, A101

    work page 2015