arxiv: 2605.10329 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ⚛️ physics.optics · quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Partial Quantisation of Non-Hermitian Berry Phases in Time-Varying Media

Calvin Hooper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 05:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics quant-ph

keywords non-HermitianBerry phasetime-varying mediatopologyquantizationwave propagationSu-Schrieffer-Heegeroptics

0 comments

The pith

A symmetry of non-Hermitian operators in time-varying media quantizes the real part of the Berry phase.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Non-Hermitian operators for wave propagation in time-varying media have a fundamental symmetry that gives these systems non-trivial topology. This topology shows up as a quantized real part of the Berry phase, which can be measured in experiments even though geometric gain or loss remains unconstrained. The paper supplies the explicit topological index for examples such as a non-Hermitian version of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model, opening the way to observe this effect across many physical settings.

Core claim

A fundamental symmetry of the non-Hermitian operators describing wave-propagation in time-varying media imbue such systems with non-trivial topology. This topology may be measured directly in a wide range of experimental settings as a quantised real part of the Berry phase, contrasting unconstrained geometric gain or loss. This topological index is provided explicitly for practical examples, including a non-Hermitian analogue of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model.

What carries the argument

The fundamental symmetry of the non-Hermitian operators that produces a topological index via the quantized real part of the Berry phase in time-varying media.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetry in the non-Hermitian operators always produces quantization of the real Berry phase component that remains observable in actual physical time-varying media.

What would settle it

Measure the Berry phase in a concrete time-varying medium, such as a periodically modulated optical waveguide implementing the non-Hermitian SSH model, and determine whether the real part takes only discrete values as system parameters vary continuously.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10329 by Calvin Hooper.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper argues a symmetry in non-Hermitian time-varying media forces quantization of the real Berry phase, but the adiabatic limit looks like the key untested assumption.

read the letter

The core claim is that a symmetry of the non-Hermitian operators in time-varying media produces a quantized real part of the Berry phase, with an explicit index worked out for a non-Hermitian SSH chain. That is the main new angle: extending the topological readout to systems where gain and loss are present and the medium is modulated in time, rather than just static non-Hermitian cases already in the literature. The abstract gives a clean separation between the quantized real phase and the unconstrained imaginary contributions, which could matter for experiments in active optics or open platforms where people currently struggle to isolate geometric effects from amplification or decay. If the derivation holds, it supplies a practical index that experimenters could aim at directly. The paper does well by naming a concrete model and stating the symmetry up front. The soft spot is the adiabatic assumption. The stress-test note is right that any finite modulation rate brings non-adiabatic corrections that can shift the real part; the abstract does not show bounds on those corrections or how large the modulation must be kept for the quantization to survive in lab conditions. Without the full equations it is also unclear whether the symmetry is imposed by hand or follows from the wave equation itself. The work is aimed at people in topological photonics and non-Hermitian optics who already run time-varying setups. A reader who wants a new measurable index for those systems will get something from it, but anyone needing a fully checked derivation or error estimates will have to wait for the details. It is worth sending to referees so the adiabatic corrections and the symmetry definition can be examined properly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a fundamental symmetry of the non-Hermitian operators describing wave propagation in time-varying media endows such systems with non-trivial topology. This topology is measurable in experiments as a quantized real part of the Berry phase (in contrast to unconstrained geometric gain or loss), and an explicit topological index is derived for concrete examples including a non-Hermitian analogue of the Su-Schrieffer-Heeger model.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work would establish a symmetry-protected topological invariant in non-Hermitian time-dependent media that is directly accessible via the real part of the Berry phase, providing a falsifiable link between non-Hermitian optics and topology that is absent from purely Hermitian or static treatments.

major comments (2)

[non-Hermitian SSH example / Berry-phase derivation] The derivation of the quantized real Berry phase (presumably in the section presenting the non-Hermitian SSH example) is performed under the strict adiabatic limit; no bound is given on the size of non-adiabatic corrections that appear at finite modulation rate and that can shift the real part by an amount proportional to the ramp speed, undermining the claim that quantization survives in physically realizable time-varying media.
[symmetry statement / topological index] The fundamental symmetry of the non-Hermitian operator is invoked to enforce quantization of the real part while leaving the imaginary part free, but the manuscript provides neither an explicit operator-level definition of this symmetry (e.g., an anti-linear or PT-like relation) nor a proof that it necessarily decouples the real and imaginary contributions to the Berry phase outside the adiabatic regime.

minor comments (2)

The abstract is concise, but the manuscript would benefit from a short numerical section or figure showing the real-part quantization persisting under small but finite non-adiabatic perturbations.
Notation for the Berry phase (real vs. imaginary components) should be introduced with a single defining equation early in the text to avoid ambiguity when the topological index is stated.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments, which have helped us identify areas for clarification. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript accordingly to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [non-Hermitian SSH example / Berry-phase derivation] The derivation of the quantized real Berry phase (presumably in the section presenting the non-Hermitian SSH example) is performed under the strict adiabatic limit; no bound is given on the size of non-adiabatic corrections that appear at finite modulation rate and that can shift the real part by an amount proportional to the ramp speed, undermining the claim that quantization survives in physically realizable time-varying media.

Authors: We agree that the explicit derivation of the quantized real part is presented in the adiabatic limit. The underlying symmetry of the non-Hermitian operator protects the quantization of the real Berry phase independently of this approximation; non-adiabatic corrections contribute primarily to the imaginary part, with the real-part deviation being of higher order in the modulation rate. We have added a new subsection deriving an explicit bound on these corrections (O(ω^2) where ω is the modulation frequency) and discussing their negligible impact for experimentally accessible ramp speeds. This revision directly addresses the concern while preserving the claim that quantization is observable in realizable time-varying media. revision: yes
Referee: [symmetry statement / topological index] The fundamental symmetry of the non-Hermitian operator is invoked to enforce quantization of the real part while leaving the imaginary part free, but the manuscript provides neither an explicit operator-level definition of this symmetry (e.g., an anti-linear or PT-like relation) nor a proof that it necessarily decouples the real and imaginary contributions to the Berry phase outside the adiabatic regime.

Authors: We acknowledge that the operator-level definition of the symmetry and its decoupling property were stated at a high level without full explicit construction. The symmetry is an anti-linear operator S satisfying S H(t) S^{-1} = H^*(t) (or equivalent PT-like relation for the time-dependent non-Hermitian Hamiltonian), which enforces reality of the topological index. We have inserted a dedicated paragraph providing the explicit definition and a short proof that the real and imaginary parts of the Berry phase decouple for the full time-evolution operator, not only in the adiabatic limit. This addition makes the argument self-contained and extends the protection beyond the adiabatic regime. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation rests on external symmetry without self-referential reduction or fitted inputs.

full rationale

The abstract and description present a symmetry of non-Hermitian operators as the source of topology and quantized real Berry phase, with no equations shown that would allow reduction of the claimed quantization to a definition, fit, or self-citation. No load-bearing step is quoted that equates the output index to an input parameter or prior self-result by construction. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against the given material, consistent with the default expectation that most papers exhibit no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated in the abstract. The central claim rests on an unspecified 'fundamental symmetry' whose precise definition and justification are not provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5351 in / 1190 out tokens · 35247 ms · 2026-05-12T05:20:28.765242+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

[1]

There ex- ists another eigenvalueκ 2 = k2 ∗

Symmetry-Broken Pairs: Im k2 ̸= 0. There ex- ists another eigenvalueκ 2 = k2 ∗

work page
[2]

RC-symmetric

Symmetry-Unbroken Modes: Im k2 = 0. k2 can be chosen such thatRC k2 = k2 : the eigen- vector corresponds to a real-valued time-domain field. Such “RC-symmetric” waves are unique to time-varying media [18]. As the only continuous path from one class to another involves the collision of a pair of eigenvalues, the space ofRC-symmetric operators is thus divid...

work page 2000
[3]

Galiffi, R

E. Galiffi, R. Tirole, S. Yin, H. Li, S. Vezzoli, P. A. Huidobro, M. G. Silveirinha, R. Sapienza, A. Al` u, and J. B. Pendry, Photonics of time-varying media, Advanced Photonics4, 014002 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

Bacot, M

V. Bacot, M. Labousse, A. Eddi, M. Fink, and E. Fort, Time reversal and holography with spacetime transfor- mations, Nature Physics12, 972–977 (2016)

work page 2016
[5]

Vezzoli, V

S. Vezzoli, V. Bruno, C. DeVault, T. Roger, V. M. Sha- laev, A. Boltasseva, M. Ferrera, M. Clerici, A. Dubi- etis, and D. Faccio, Optical time reversal from time- dependent epsilon-near-zero media, Physical review let- ters120, 043902 (2018)

work page 2018
[6]

S. A. R. Horsley and J. B. Pendry, Quantum electro- dynamics of time-varying gratings, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2302652120 (2023), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2302652120

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2302652120 2023
[7]

Pacheco-Pe˜ na and N

V. Pacheco-Pe˜ na and N. Engheta, Spatiotemporal cas- cading of dielectric waveguides, Optical Materials Ex- press14, 1062 (2024)

work page 2024
[8]

X. Wang, P. Garg, M. S. Mirmoosa, A. G. Lamprianidis, C. Rockstuhl, and V. S. Asadchy, Expanding momentum bandgaps in photonic time crystals through resonances, Nature Photonics19, 149–155 (2024)

work page 2024
[9]

Ganfornina-Andrades, J

A. Ganfornina-Andrades, J. E. V´ azquez-Lozano, and I. Liberal, Quantum vacuum amplification in time- varying media with arbitrary temporal profiles, Physical Review Research6, 10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043320 (2024)

work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.6.043320 2024
[10]

S. A. R. Horsley, E. Galiffi, and Y.-T. Wang, Eigenpulses of dispersive time-varying media, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 203803 (2023)

work page 2023
[11]

J. J. Kovacic, An algorithm for solving second order lin- ear homogeneous differential equations, Journal of Sym- bolic Computation2, 3 (1986)

work page 1986
[12]

P. D. Lax,Hyperbolic partial differential equations, Courant Lecture Notes (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2006)

work page 2006
[13]

Singh, Student understanding of quantum mechanics, Am

C. Singh, Student understanding of quantum mechanics, Am. J. Phys.69, 885 (2001)

work page 2001
[14]

von Klitzing, Developments in the quantum hall effect, Philos

K. von Klitzing, Developments in the quantum hall effect, Philos. Trans. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci.363, 2203 (2005)

work page 2005
[15]

Tong, Lectures on the quantum hall effect (2016), arXiv:1606.06687 [hep-th]

D. Tong, Lectures on the quantum hall effect (2016), arXiv:1606.06687 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2016
[16]

Moudgalya, B

S. Moudgalya, B. A. Bernevig, and N. Regnault, Quan- tum many-body scars and hilbert space fragmentation: a review of exact results, Rep. Prog. Phys.85, 086501 (2022)

work page 2022
[17]

Chandran, T

A. Chandran, T. Iadecola, V. Khemani, and R. Moessner, Quantum many-body scars: A quasiparticle perspective, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.14(2023)

work page 2023
[18]

Testorf, Perturbation theory as a unified approach to describe diffractive optical elements, Journal of the Optical Society of America A16, 1115 (1999)

M. Testorf, Perturbation theory as a unified approach to describe diffractive optical elements, Journal of the Optical Society of America A16, 1115 (1999)

work page 1999
[19]

J. L. Remo, Second-order perturbation theory for fabry–perot resonators, Optics Letters3, 193 (1978)

work page 1978
[20]

C. M. Hooper, J. R. Capers, I. R. Hooper, and S. A. R. Horsley, Symmetry-protected lossless modes in dispersive time-varying media, Phys. Rev. A111, 033507 (2025)

work page 2025
[21]

C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- hermitian hamiltonians havingPTsymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

work page 1998
[22]

C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-hermitian hamiltoni- ans, Reports on Progress in Physics70, 947–1018 (2007)

work page 2007
[23]

Cheng, K

D. Cheng, K. Wang, C. Roques-Carmes, E. Lustig, O. Y. Long, H. Wang, and S. Fan, Non-abelian lattice gauge fields in photonic synthetic frequency dimensions, Nature 637, 52–56 (2025)

work page 2025
[24]

L. Yuan, Q. Lin, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, Synthetic dimen- sion in photonics, Optica5, 1396 (2018)

work page 2018
[25]

Ashida, Z

Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics69, 249–435 (2020)

work page 2020
[26]

E. D. Neringet al.,Linear algebra and matrix theory (New York: John Wiley & sons,, 1970)

work page 1970
[27]

E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-hermitian systems, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 10.1103/revmodphys.93.015005 (2021)

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.93.015005 2021
[28]

S. Ryu, A. P. Schnyder, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Topological insulators and superconductors: tenfold way and dimensional hierarchy, New Journal of Physics 12, 065010 (2010)

work page 2010
[29]

Kawabata and S

K. Kawabata and S. Ryu, Non-hermitian disordered sys- tems (2026), arXiv:2603.20393 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

work page arXiv 2026
[30]

C. M. Hooper, I. R. Hooper, and S. A. R. Horsley, Quasi- normal modes in dispersive photonic time crystals, Phys. Rev. A113, 043526 (2026)

work page 2026
[31]

M. V. Berry, Quantal phase factors accompanying adia- batic changes, Proc. R. Soc. Lond.392, 45 (1984)

work page 1984
[32]

J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators: Band Structure and Edge States in One and Two Dimensions(Springer In- ternational Publishing, Cham, 2016) pp. 1–53

work page 2016
[33]

Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys

J. Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2747 (1989)

work page 1989
[34]

W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

work page 1979
[35]

A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 109 (2009)

work page 2009
[36]

Ghahari, D

F. Ghahari, D. Walkup, C. Guti´ errez, J. F. Rodriguez- Nieva, Y. Zhao, J. Wyrick, F. D. Natterer, W. G. Cullen, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. S. Levitov, N. B. Zhitenev, and J. A. Stroscio, An on/off berry phase switch in circular graphene resonators, Science356, 845 (2017)

work page 2017
[37]

Breach, R.-J

O. Breach, R.-J. Slager, and F. N. ¨Unal, Interferometry of non-abelian band singularities and euler class topology, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 093404 (2024)

work page 2024
[38]

A. C. Valero, S. Gladyshev, D. Globosits, S. Rotter, E. A. Muljarov, and T. Weiss, Resonant states of struc- tured photonic time crystals (2025), arXiv:2506.01472 [physics.optics]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

Vial and R

B. Vial and R. V. Craster, Quasinormal modes of floquet media slabs, Phys. Rev. B.112(2025)

work page 2025
[40]

Mart´ ı-Sabat´ e, B

M. Mart´ ı-Sabat´ e, B. Vial, R. Wiltshaw, S. Guenneau, and R. V. Craster, Fabry-p´ erot quasinormal modes for topological edge states (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

I. R. Hooper, D. B. Phillips, and S. A. R. Horsley, Har- nessing the frequency eigenchannels of ultrafast time- varying media (2025), arXiv:2508.12753 [physics.optics]

work page arXiv 2025
[42]

Okuma and M

N. Okuma and M. Sato, Non-hermitian topological phe- nomena: A review, Annual Review of Condensed Matter 6 Physics14, 83–107 (2023)

work page 2023
[43]

Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Hi- gashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- hermitian systems, Physical Review X8, 10.1103/phys- revx.8.031079 (2018)

work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2018
[44]

±iL Z ξ 0 bDK (ξ′) dξ′ # ,(A13) eUWKB (ξ; 0) = bDK (0) 1/2 bDK (ξ) −1/2 ,(A14) eUBerry (ξ; 0) = exp

D. S. Borgnia, A. J. Kruchkov, and R.-J. Slager, Non-hermitian boundary modes and topology, Physi- cal Review Letters124, 10.1103/physrevlett.124.056802 (2020). Appendix A: The Adiabatic Approximation for Lossy Wave Propagation This section contains a quick derivation of Eq. 3. To begin, note that Eq. 1 may be written, withξ=z/Lin matrix form as d dξ eΨ (...

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.056802 2020