pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10381 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Energy-resolved pulse profiles of Vela X-1: cross-calibrating XMM-Newton and NuSTAR to trace spectral features

Dimitrios K. Maniadakis , Antonino D'A\`i , Camille M. Diez , Giancarlo Cusumano , Elena Ambrosi , Carlo Ferrigno , Ekaterina Sokolova-Lapa , Matteo Lucchini
show 7 more authors
Peter Kretschmar Alessio Anitra Christian Malacaria Gabriele A. Matzeu Ciro Pinto J\"orn Wilms Felix F\"urst
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords Vela X-1accreting X-ray pulsarspulsed fraction spectrumcross-calibrationcyclotron resonant scattering featuresXMM-NewtonNuSTARpulse profiles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pulsed fraction spectra of Vela X-1 from simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations agree within 5% after corrections and reveal emission lines plus cyclotron features across 1-70 keV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether energy-resolved pulse profiles of the accreting pulsar Vela X-1 look the same when measured by two different X-ray telescopes at the same time. After building energy-phase matrices and subtracting instrumental and exposure differences, the pulsed fraction spectra from the two instruments match to within 5% in the overlapping 3-10 keV band when only common time intervals are used. The combined spectrum from 1 to 70 keV then shows clear localized features at energies known to host emission lines in soft X-rays and cyclotron resonant scattering features at higher energies. Orbital-phase modeling further shows that heavy absorption suppresses the soft features during parts of the orbit.

Core claim

After correcting for instrumental effects, the pulsed fraction spectra derived strictly over the common exposure intervals of the two instruments agree within 5% in their overlapping 3-10 keV range. Remaining discrepancies larger than 5% are confined to the iron-line region and can be attributed to the different energy resolutions of the two instruments. The broadband pulsed fraction spectrum reveals significant localized features corresponding to known emission lines in the soft band and to cyclotron resonant scattering features. Orbital-phase-resolved modeling of the EPIC-pn pulsed fraction spectrum shows that the soft-band features depend strongly on the equivalent absorption column, with

What carries the argument

The pulsed fraction spectrum, obtained from energy-phase matrices of the pulse profiles, serving as both a quantitative cross-calibration diagnostic and a spectro-timing tracer of spectral features.

If this is right

  • The pulsed fraction spectrum can be applied as a cross-calibration check between any pair of X-ray instruments observing the same pulsar.
  • Cyclotron resonant scattering features and emission lines can be identified through their timing signatures in the pulsed fraction without relying solely on spectral fitting.
  • Absorption column variations across the orbit modulate the visibility of soft-band features in the pulsed fraction spectrum.
  • The method provides a compact observable that combines timing and spectral information for studying emission geometry in accreting X-ray pulsars.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could help reconcile spectral model disagreements between instruments by providing an independent timing-based check on feature presence.
  • Applying the same analysis to other bright pulsars might test whether pulsed fraction spectra generally trace cyclotron lines across different magnetic field strengths.
  • Future missions with overlapping energy coverage could use pulsed fraction spectra as a built-in calibration verification tool during early operations.
  • The strong dependence on absorption suggests the pulsed fraction could serve as a proxy for inferring column density changes without full spectral modeling.

Load-bearing premise

All instrumental response differences and observational effects including exposure overlaps and orbital variations have been fully and accurately corrected so that remaining differences reflect only astrophysical or resolution effects.

What would settle it

A new simultaneous observation of Vela X-1 with a third instrument that produces a pulsed fraction spectrum deviating by more than 5% from the XMM-Newton plus NuSTAR result in the 3-10 keV overlap region would falsify the agreement after corrections.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10381 by Alessio Anitra, Antonino D'A\`i, Camille M. Diez, Carlo Ferrigno, Christian Malacaria, Ciro Pinto, Dimitrios K. Maniadakis, Ekaterina Sokolova-Lapa, Elena Ambrosi, Felix F\"urst, Gabriele A. Matzeu, Giancarlo Cusumano, J\"orn Wilms, Matteo Lucchini, Peter Kretschmar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Light curves of NuSTAR/FPMA and XMM-Newton/EPIC-pn, constructed using time bins of 100 s. The blue, green, and red boxes (first, second, and third intervals) indicate the three orbital phase intervals as defined by Diez et al. (2023). The gray shaded regions denote the NuSTAR observational gaps. screening on event patterns and quality flags. We used evselect to extract events from a rectangular region cent… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Channel–phase matrix of Vela X-1 obtained with EPIC-pn data using 32 phase bins. (b) Energy–phase matrix derived [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Energy–resolved pulse profiles with EPIC-pn data, ex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Pulsed fraction spectra of Vela X-1 obtained with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Pulsed fraction spectrum calculated using the rms definition (left) and the area definition (right). Both panels show the PF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Pulse profiles of Vela X-1 in the 4–5 keV energy band [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Bayesian fit to the PF spectrum in the 1–5 keV band using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Bayesian modelling of the full-exposure EPIC-pn PF [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The pulsed fraction spectrum obtained from the full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Pulsed fraction spectra (top panel) and correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Pulse profiles probe the emission geometry of accreting X-ray pulsars, but their observed shapes may depend on instrumental response and observational setup. The pulsed fraction spectrum provides a compact spectro-timing observable that can both trace localized spectral features and serve as a quantitative cross-calibration diagnostic. We assess the consistency of energy-resolved pulse profiles obtained with simultaneous XMM-Newton/EPIC-pn and NuSTAR/FPM observations of Vela X-1, and investigate the broadband pulsed fraction spectrum as a diagnostic of spectral features from 1 to 70 keV. We construct energy-phase matrices for both instruments and derive pulsed fraction spectra after carefully accounting for instrumental and observational effects. We quantify the residual systematics in the overlapping 3-10 keV band. We then model the broadband pulsed fraction spectra phenomenologically and search for timing signatures of spectral features. After correcting for instrumental effects, the pulsed fraction spectra derived strictly over the common exposure intervals of the two instruments agree within 5% in their overlapping 3-10 keV range. Remaining discrepancies larger than 5% are confined to the iron-line region and can be attributed to the different energy resolutions of the two instruments. The broadband pulsed fraction spectrum reveals significant localized features corresponding to known emission lines in the soft band and to cyclotron resonant scattering features. Orbital-phase-resolved modeling of the EPIC-pn pulsed fraction spectrum shows that the soft-band features depend strongly on the equivalent absorption column, with emission-line signatures becoming progressively suppressed during highly absorbed intervals. The pulsed fraction spectrum serves both as a quantitative cross-calibration diagnostic and as a powerful spectro-timing diagnostic.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes simultaneous XMM-Newton/EPIC-pn and NuSTAR/FPM observations of the accreting X-ray pulsar Vela X-1. It constructs energy-phase matrices, derives pulsed fraction spectra after corrections for instrumental and observational effects, and reports that these spectra agree within 5% in the 3-10 keV overlap when restricted to common exposure intervals. Discrepancies exceeding 5% are localized to the iron-line region and attributed to differing energy resolutions. The broadband (1-70 keV) pulsed fraction spectrum is shown to exhibit localized features matching known emission lines and cyclotron resonant scattering features (CRSFs); orbital-phase-resolved modeling further indicates that soft-band features are suppressed at high absorption columns.

Significance. If the corrections hold, the work demonstrates that the pulsed fraction spectrum is a robust, largely model-independent spectro-timing diagnostic capable of both quantitative cross-calibration between instruments and identification of astrophysical spectral features. The use of strictly overlapping exposures and explicit quantification of residuals (rather than assumption of perfect cancellation) is a clear strength. The approach could be applied to other bright pulsars and provides a practical test of instrumental consistency in the 3-10 keV band where both telescopes operate.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods / Results (pulsed fraction derivation)] The central 5% agreement claim rests on the completeness of the instrumental and observational corrections (exposure overlap, background, orbital variations, response differences). The manuscript states that these have been 'carefully accounted for' and that residuals are quantified, but provides no explicit breakdown or table showing the magnitude of each correction term before and after application. This detail is load-bearing for the cross-calibration result and should be added (e.g., as a supplementary table or dedicated subsection).
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and § on broadband spectrum] The abstract and text refer to 'significant localized features' without quoting the statistical significance threshold or the exact energy bins used for the broadband spectrum; a brief statement of the detection criterion would improve clarity.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state whether the plotted pulsed fraction spectra are normalized or absolute, and whether error bars include only statistical or also systematic uncertainties from the corrections.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central 5% agreement claim rests on the completeness of the instrumental and observational corrections (exposure overlap, background, orbital variations, response differences). The manuscript states that these have been 'carefully accounted for' and that residuals are quantified, but provides no explicit breakdown or table showing the magnitude of each correction term before and after application. This detail is load-bearing for the cross-calibration result and should be added (e.g., as a supplementary table or dedicated subsection).

    Authors: We agree that an explicit, step-by-step quantification of the individual corrections would strengthen the transparency of the 5% agreement result. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection (or supplementary table) that tabulates the pulsed-fraction spectrum in the 3-10 keV overlap before and after each correction term in turn: (i) restriction to strictly common exposure intervals, (ii) background subtraction, (iii) orbital-phase selection, and (iv) convolution with the respective instrument responses. The final residuals after all corrections are already shown in the main text and figures; the new table will simply make the contribution of each term explicit and allow readers to judge the robustness of the cross-calibration claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper performs an observational comparison of simultaneous XMM-Newton and NuSTAR data on Vela X-1, deriving pulsed fraction spectra from energy-phase matrices after applying standard instrumental corrections and restricting to common exposure intervals. The reported 5% agreement in the 3-10 keV overlap is a direct empirical measurement of residuals, not a model prediction or fitted parameter renamed as output. Broadband feature identification relies on known emission lines and CRSFs with phenomenological modeling, and orbital-phase dependence is shown via data subsets. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to self-definition, fitted inputs called predictions, or self-citation chains; the analysis is self-contained against the external datasets and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior author work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work is purely observational data analysis using standard X-ray astronomy techniques. No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced or required by the central claims in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5675 in / 1099 out tokens · 57847 ms · 2026-05-12T03:53:33.223920+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2023, PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1516

    Abril-Pla, O., Andreani, V ., Carroll, C., et al. 2023, PeerJ Computer Science, 9, e1516

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    2021, A&A, 648, A105

    Amato, R., Grinberg, V ., Hell, N., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A105

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    2026 [arXiv:2603.13107]

    Ambrosi, E., D’Aì, A., Cusumano, G., et al. 2026 [arXiv:2603.13107]

    work page arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    A., Cook, R., et al

    Bachetti, M., Harrison, F. A., Cook, R., et al. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 800, 109

    work page 2015

  5. [5]

    2026, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of the Pacific, 138, 014501

    Bachetti, M., Terada, Y ., Shidatsu, M., et al. 2026, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of the Pacific, 138, 014501

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    A., Klochkov, D., Schönherr, G., et al

    Becker, P. A., Klochkov, D., Schönherr, G., et al. 2012, A&A, 544, A123

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    H., Boldt, E

    Becker, R. H., Boldt, E. A., Holt, S. S., Serlemitsos, P. J., & Swank, J. H. 1978, ApJ, 221, 912–920

    work page 1978

  8. [8]

    1997, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 113, 367

    Bildsten, L., Chakrabarty, D., Chiu, J., et al. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 113, 367

    work page 1997

  9. [9]

    Blondin, J. M. 1994, in AIP Conference Proceedings, V ol. 308, The Evolution of X-ray Binaries, ed. S. Holt & C. S. Day (American Institute of Physics), 578–582

    work page 1994

  10. [10]

    M., Kallman, T

    Blondin, J. M., Kallman, T. R., Fryxell, B. A., & Taam, R. E. 1990, The Astro- physical Journal, 356, 591

    work page 1990

  11. [11]

    M., Stevens, I

    Blondin, J. M., Stevens, I. R., & Kallman, T. R. 1991, The Astrophysical Journal, 371, 684

    work page 1991

  12. [12]

    & Wilms, J

    Caballero, I. & Wilms, J. 2012, arXiv preprint arXiv:1206.3124 D’Aì, A., Maniadakis, D. K., Ferrigno, C., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A316

    work page arXiv 2012

  13. [13]

    M., Dupourqué, S., Zhou, M., Quintin, E., Matzeu, G

    Diez, C., Dupourqué, S., Zhou, M., et al. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07258

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    M., Grinberg, V ., Fürst, F., et al

    Diez, C. M., Grinberg, V ., Fürst, F., et al. 2022, A&A, 660, A19

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    M., Grinberg, V ., Fürst, F., & et al

    Diez, C. M., Grinberg, V ., Fürst, F., & et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A147

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    & Malacaria, C

    Ducci, L. & Malacaria, C. 2023, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astro- physics (Springer), 1–34

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    2015, A&A, 577, A130

    Falanga, M., Bozzo, E., Lutovinov, A., et al. 2015, A&A, 577, A130

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    2023, A&A, 677, A103

    Ferrigno, C., D’Aì, A., & Ambrosi, E. 2023, A&A, 677, A103

    work page 2023

  19. [19]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    & Fabian, A

    Fransson, C. & Fabian, A. C. 1980, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 87, 102

    work page 1980

  21. [21]

    A., Taam, R

    Fryxell, B. A., Taam, R. E., & McMillan, S. L. W. 1987, The Astrophysical Journal, 315, 536

    work page 1987

  22. [22]

    2014, in American Astronomical So- ciety Meeting Abstracts, V ol

    Fuerst, F., Pottschmidt, K., Wilms, J., et al. 2014, in American Astronomical So- ciety Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 223, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #223, 438.20 Fürst, F., Pottschmidt, K., Wilms, J., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 780, 133

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    P., & Blank, D

    Goldstein, G., Huenemoerder, D. P., & Blank, D. 2004, AJ, 127, 2310–2315

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    2017, A&A, 608, A143

    Grinberg, V ., Hell, N., El Mellah, I., et al. 2017, A&A, 608, A143

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    2002, arXiv preprint astro- ph/0203235

    Haberl, F., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., & Zavlin, V . 2002, arXiv preprint astro- ph/0203235

    work page arXiv 2002

  26. [26]

    & White, N

    Haberl, F. & White, N. E. 1990, The Astrophysical Journal, 361, 225

    work page 1990

  27. [27]

    Houck, J., Denicola, L., Manset, N., Veillet, C., & Crabtree, D. 2000

    work page 2000

  28. [28]

    2001, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 365, L1

    Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 365, L1

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    Kaastra, J. S. & Bleeker, J. A. M. 2016, A&A, 587, A151

    work page 2016

  30. [30]

    2021, A&A, 652, A95

    Kretschmar, P., El Mellah, I., Martínez-Núñez, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 652, A95

    work page 2021

  31. [31]

    2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1143

    Kumar, R., Carroll, C., Hartikainen, A., & Martin, O. 2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1143

    work page 2019

  32. [32]

    1992, The Astrophysical Journal, 389, 665

    Lewis, W., Rappaport, S., Levine, A., & Nagase, F. 1992, The Astrophysical Journal, 389, 665

    work page 1992

  33. [33]

    2020, A&A, 641, A144

    Lomaeva, M., Grinberg, V ., Guainazzi, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A144

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.10615

    Lucchini, M., Ricketts, B., Uttley, P., & Huppenkothen, D. 2025, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.10615

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Lucy, L. B. & White, R. L. 1980, The Astrophysical Journal, 241, 300

    work page 1980

  36. [36]

    & Paul, B

    Maitra, C. & Paul, B. 2013, The Astrophysical Journal, 763, 79

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    J., et al

    Malacaria, C., Jenke, P., Roberts, O. J., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 90

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    2016, A&A, 588, A100

    Malacaria, C., Mihara, T., Santangelo, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 588, A100

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    N., D’Aì, A., et al

    Malacaria, C., Pike, S. N., D’Aì, A., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A321

    work page 2026

  40. [40]

    K., Sokolova-Lapa, E., D’Aì, A., et al

    Maniadakis, D. K., Sokolova-Lapa, E., D’Aì, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A70

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    & Walter, R

    Manousakis, A. & Walter, R. 2015, A&A, 575, A58 Martínez-Núñez, S., Kretschmar, P., Bozzo, E., et al. 2017, Space Sci. Rev., 212, 59 Martínez-Núñez, S., Kretschmar, P., Bozzo, E., & et al. 2017, Space Science Reviews, 212, 59

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    & Nagel, W

    Meszaros, P. & Nagel, W. 1985, ApJ, 298, 147

    work page 1985

  43. [43]

    & Tsygankov, S

    Mushtukov, A. & Tsygankov, S. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2204.14185

    work page arXiv 2022

  44. [44]

    1994, ApJ, 436, L1–L4

    Nagase, F., Zylstra, G., Sonobe, T., & et al. 1994, ApJ, 436, L1–L4

    work page 1994

  45. [45]

    1984, PASJ, 36, 699–708

    Ohashi, T., Inoue, H., Koyama, K., & et al. 1984, PASJ, 36, 699–708

    work page 1984

  46. [46]

    & Dal Fiume, D

    Orlandini, M. & Dal Fiume, D. 2001, in AIP Conference Proceedings, V ol. 599 (American Institute of Physics), 283–294

    work page 2001

  47. [47]

    M., Hamann, W.-R., & Feldmeier, A

    Oskinova, L. M., Hamann, W.-R., & Feldmeier, A. 2007, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 476, 1331

    work page 2007

  48. [48]

    2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 537, 3421

    Rawlings, A., Keitaanranta, A., Mattero, M., et al. 2025, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 537, 3421

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    L., Orosz, J

    Rawls, M. L., Orosz, J. A., McClintock, J. E., & et al. 2011, The Astrophysical Journal, 730, 25

    work page 2011

  50. [50]

    A., Kahn, S

    Sako, M., Liedahl, D. A., Kahn, S. M., & Paerels, F. 1999, ApJ, 525, 921–928

    work page 1999

  51. [51]

    1986, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of Japan, 38, 731

    Sato, N., Hayakawa, S., Nagase, F., & et al. 1986, Publications of the Astronom- ical Society of Japan, 38, 731

    work page 1986

  52. [52]

    S., Canizares, C

    Schulz, N. S., Canizares, C. R., Lee, J. C., & Sako, M. 2002, ApJ, 564, L21–L25

    work page 2002

  53. [53]

    2023, Radiative Transfer in the Vicinity of Accreting Neutron Stars-Polarized Emission in Strong Magnetic Fields (Friedrich-Alexander- Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg (Germany))

    Sokolova-Lapa, E. 2023, Radiative Transfer in the Vicinity of Accreting Neutron Stars-Polarized Emission in Strong Magnetic Fields (Friedrich-Alexander- Universitaet Erlangen-Nuernberg (Germany))

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    2021, A&A, 651, A12

    Sokolova-Lapa, E., Gornostaev, M., Wilms, J., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A12

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    S., Doroshenko, V ., Mushtukov, A

    Tsygankov, S. S., Doroshenko, V ., Mushtukov, A. A., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 487, L30

    work page 2019

  56. [56]

    P., van de Sande, J., Fraser-McKelvie, A., et al

    Vaughan, S. P., van de Sande, J., Fraser-McKelvie, A., et al. 2024, Monthly No- tices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 528, 5852

    work page 2024

  57. [57]

    2017, Statistics and computing, 27, 1413

    Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., & Gabry, J. 2017, Statistics and computing, 27, 1413

    work page 2017

  58. [58]

    2021, Bayesian analysis, 16, 667

    Vehtari, A., Gelman, A., Simpson, D., Carpenter, B., & Bürkner, P.-C. 2021, Bayesian analysis, 16, 667

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 651, 421

    Watanabe, S., Sako, M., Ishida, M., & et al. 2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 651, 421

    work page 2006

  60. [60]

    2023, The Astronomical Journal, 165, 112

    Welbanks, L., McGill, P., Line, M., & Madhusudhan, N. 2023, The Astronomical Journal, 165, 112

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Zalot, N., Sokolova-Lapa, E., Stierhof, J., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A95 Article number, page 12 of 15 Maniadakis et al.: Energy-resolved pulse profiles of Vela X-1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8PF (a) PF corrected PF 3 10 20 30 40 50 6070 Energy (keV) 25 0 25 PF/PFcorr [%] (b) Fig. A.1: Panel (a) compares the PF spectrum computed with and without applying...

    work page 2024