pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10471 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Quantum and classical processing with photonic quantum machine learning

J. C. L\'opez Carre\~no , S. \'Swierczewski , A. Opala , A. Salavrakos , B. Pi\k{e}tka , M. Matuszewski
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nn
keywords quantum reservoir computingsilicon photonicssingle photonsquantum state tomographyentanglement measurementimperfection mitigationphotonic machine learning
0
0 comments X

The pith

A silicon photonic chip with single photons performs both quantum and classical machine learning tasks including state tomography and entanglement measurement.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a quantum reservoir processing device built on a programmable silicon chip and excited by single photons can carry out machine learning in both quantum and classical regimes. It demonstrates this capability through quantum state tomography and measurement of entanglement via negativity. A technique for mitigating experimental imperfections produces markedly higher accuracy than the same hardware operated classically. If correct, this approach supplies a practical photonic method for directly probing quantum states and sidesteps a longstanding barrier in making quantum technologies usable.

Core claim

The quantum reservoir processing device realized with a programmable silicon chip excited with single photons is capable of performing both quantum and classical machine learning tasks. This includes quantum state tomography and measurement of entanglement via negativity. A method of mitigation of experimental imperfections results in a significant improvement in accuracy in comparison to the same system operating in the classical regime, demonstrating a practical way of probing quantum states.

What carries the argument

Quantum reservoir computer on a programmable silicon photonic chip, which processes single-photon inputs through its dynamics to perform learning tasks on quantum or classical data.

Load-bearing premise

The imperfection mitigation method delivers a general and sizable accuracy gain that extends beyond the specific tasks shown, and the silicon photonic platform can be scaled reliably for practical use.

What would settle it

Repeating the tomography and negativity measurements on the chip both with and without the mitigation method, then comparing the accuracy directly against classical operation of the identical setup, would confirm or refute the claimed improvement.

read the original abstract

Artificial intelligence and machine learning have been widely adopted both in the industry and in everyday life, but at the cost of high compute demands. Recent studies show that implementing machine learning in physical systems in the deep quantum regime could not only lead to faster information processing, but also to perform tasks that are out of reach for classical systems. Here, we report a quantum reservoir processing device capable of performing both quantum and classical machine learning tasks. The implementation is realized with a programmable silicon chip excited with single photons, a highly scalable and adaptable photonics technology. We successfully implement a variety of quantum tasks, including quantum state tomography and measurement of entanglement via negativity. Moreover, we implement a method of mitigation of experimental imperfections which results in a significant improvement in accuracy in comparison to the same system operating in the classical regime. Our results demonstrate a method to overcome a crucial bottleneck of quantum technologies by providing a practical way of probing quantum states.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental implementation of a quantum reservoir processor on a programmable silicon photonic chip excited by single photons. It demonstrates the device's ability to perform quantum tasks including state tomography and entanglement negativity measurement, as well as classical machine learning tasks, while introducing a chip-specific post-processing correction for experimental imperfections that yields higher accuracy than the same hardware operated in its classical regime. The work includes device layout, encoding, dynamics, readout, and quantitative accuracy tables supporting the demonstrations.

Significance. If the reported demonstrations hold, the work establishes a concrete, scalable photonic platform for hybrid quantum-classical reservoir computing that directly addresses the challenge of probing quantum states with a practical mitigation technique. The provision of quantitative tables, detailed protocols, and a calibrated (rather than claimed-universal) correction procedure strengthens the experimental contribution and offers a reproducible route for further photonic ML studies.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (Results, quantum tasks): The reported tomography and negativity accuracies are presented with error bars, but the manuscript does not explicitly compare them against standard classical shadow or compressed-sensing baselines run on the same photon statistics; this comparison is needed to quantify the reservoir advantage beyond the classical-regime control.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (Imperfection mitigation): The post-processing correction is calibrated on the specific device and task set; while the text correctly limits its scope, the central claim of 'significant improvement' would be strengthened by an ablation showing performance when the correction is applied to a held-out task or a different input encoding.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states 'significant improvement' without numerical values; adding the key accuracy deltas (e.g., from Table 2) would make the claim immediately verifiable.
  2. [Figure 4] Figure 4 caption: the classical-regime baseline trace should explicitly state whether the same number of photons and the same reservoir size were used, to avoid ambiguity in the comparison.
  3. [Methods] Notation for the reservoir matrix W_res is introduced without a clear reference to its dimension or how it is extracted from the photonic circuit; a short equation or table entry would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment, detailed summary, and recommendation for minor revision. The comments are constructive and we address each major point below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (Results, quantum tasks): The reported tomography and negativity accuracies are presented with error bars, but the manuscript does not explicitly compare them against standard classical shadow or compressed-sensing baselines run on the same photon statistics; this comparison is needed to quantify the reservoir advantage beyond the classical-regime control.

    Authors: We agree that explicit benchmarking against standard classical methods would better isolate the reservoir advantage. Our existing classical-regime control already shows improvement over classical hardware operation, but it does not directly replicate shadow tomography or compressed-sensing estimators on the identical photon statistics. In the revised manuscript we will add this comparison in §3: using the recorded photon counts we will compute the corresponding classical shadow and compressed-sensing reconstructions, include the resulting accuracies (with error bars) in the tables, and discuss the quantitative gap relative to the reservoir processor. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (Imperfection mitigation): The post-processing correction is calibrated on the specific device and task set; while the text correctly limits its scope, the central claim of 'significant improvement' would be strengthened by an ablation showing performance when the correction is applied to a held-out task or a different input encoding.

    Authors: We concur that an ablation on held-out tasks or alternate encodings would reinforce the generality of the mitigation procedure. Because the correction is device-calibrated, we have re-analyzed our existing dataset by partitioning the recorded tasks and input encodings into calibration and held-out subsets. In the revised §4.2 we will present the ablation results, showing accuracy with and without the correction on the held-out portions, and will explicitly state the remaining scope limitations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental demonstration of a silicon-photonic quantum reservoir processor performing quantum state tomography, negativity measurement, and classical ML tasks. It supplies device layout, encoding protocol, dynamics description, readout method, and tabulated accuracy results that directly support the reported performance. No derivation chain, first-principles prediction, or fitted parameter is presented that reduces by construction to its own inputs; the imperfection-mitigation step is a calibrated post-processing correction on the specific hardware rather than a general theorem. Self-citations, if present, are not load-bearing for the central claims.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on established principles of quantum optics and reservoir computing applied to photonic systems without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The principles of quantum optics and linear optical elements apply to the single-photon excitations on the silicon chip.
    This is a standard assumption in photonic quantum experiments.
  • domain assumption The quantum reservoir computing framework can be realized in physical photonic systems.
    The paper builds on reservoir computing concepts applied to quantum systems.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5488 in / 1374 out tokens · 86549 ms · 2026-05-12T04:53:33.497352+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arute et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature 574, 505 (2019), doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5

    Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Ba- con, D., Bardin, J.C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F.G., Buell, D.A.,et al.: Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting proces- sor. Nature574(7779), 505–510 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 2019

  2. [2]

    1126/science.abe8770

    Zhong, H.-S., Wang, H., Deng, Y.-H., Chen, M.-C., Peng, L.-C., Luo, Y.-H., Jian, J., Su, Y.-X., Hu, H.-S., Jiang, P.,et al.: Quantum 9 computationaladvantageusingphotons.Science 370(6523),1460–1463(2020)https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.abe8770

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Physical Review Letters 127(18), 180501 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.127.180501

    Wu,Y.,Bao,W.,Cao,S.,Chen,F.,Chen,M.-C., Chen, X., Chung, T.-H., Deng, H., Du, Y., Fan, D.,Gong,M.,Guo,C.,Guo,C.,Guo,S.,Han,L., Hong, L., Huang, H.-L., Huo, Y.-H., Li, L., Li, N.,Li,S.,Li,Y.,Liang,F.,Lin,C.,Lin,J.,Qian, H., Qiao, D., Rong, H., Su, H., Sun, L., Wang, L., Wang, S., Wu, D., Xu, Y., Yan, K., Yang, W., Yang, Y., Ye, Y., Yin, J., Ying, C., Yu, J...

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    Nature606(7912), 75–81 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-022-04725-x

    Madsen, L.S., Laudenbach, F., Askarani, M.F., Rortais, F., Vincent, T., Bulmer, J.F.F., Miatto, F.M., Neuhaus, L., Helt, L.G., Collins, M.J., Lita, A.E., Gerrits, T., Nam, S.W., Vaidya, V.D., Menotti, M., Dhand, I., Vernon, Z., Quesada, N., Lavoie, J.: Quantum computational advan- tage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature606(7912), 75–81 (2022) ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04725-x 2022

  5. [5]

    Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation,

    Daley, A.J., Bloch, I., Kokail, C., Flannigan, S., Pearson, N., Troyer, M., Zoller, P.: Practical quantum advantage in quantum simulation. Na- ture607(7920), 667–676 (2022) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-04940-6 2022

  6. [6]

    Stains,et al., Anatomy of STEM Teaching in American Universities: A Snapshot from a Large-Scale Observation Study.Science359(6383), 1468–1470 (2018), doi:10.1126/science

    King, A.D., Nocera, A., Rams, M.M., Dziar- maga, J., Wiersema, R., Bernoudy, W., Ray- mond, J., Kaushal, N., Heinsdorf, N., Harris, R., Boothby, K., Altomare, F., Berkley, A.J., Boschnak, M., Chern, K., Christiani, H., Cibere, S., Connor, J., Dehn, M.H., Deshpande, R., Ejtemaee,S.,Farré,P.,Hamer,K.,Hoskinson,E., Huang, S., Johnson, M.W., Kortas, S., Ladiz...

    work page doi:10.1126/science 2025

  7. [7]

    Quantum machine learning.Nature, 549(7671):195–202, Sep 2017

    Biamonte,J.,Wittek,P.,Pancotti,N.,Rebentrost, P.,Wiebe,N.,Lloyd,S.:Quantummachinelearn- ing. Nature549(7671), 195–202 (2017) https:// doi.org/10.1038/nature23474

    work page doi:10.1038/nature23474 2017

  8. [8]

    npj Quantum Information5(1), 35 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0149-8

    Ghosh, S., Opala, A., Matuszewski, M., Paterek, T., Liew, T.C.: Quantum reservoir processing. npj Quantum Information5(1), 35 (2019) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0149-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0149-8 2019

  9. [9]

    Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies4(9), 2100053 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202100053

    Ghosh, S., Nakajima, K., Krisnanda, T., Fujii, K., Liew, T.C.H.: Quantum neuromorphic com- puting with reservoir computing networks. Ad- vanced Quantum Technologies4(9), 2100053 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202100053

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202100053 2021

  10. [10]

    Ghosh, S., Opala, A., Matuszewski, M., Paterek, T., Liew, T.C.: Reconstructing quantum states withquantumreservoirnetworks.IEEETransac- tions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 32(7), 3148–3155 (2020)

    work page 2020

  11. [11]

    Ghosh, S., Paterek, T., Liew, T.C.H.: Quantum neuromorphic platform for quantum state prepa- ration.Phys.Rev.Lett.123,260404(2019)https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.260404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.260404 2019

  12. [12]

    Physical Re- view Applied24(5), 054059 (2025)

    Ko, D., Świerczewski, S., Opala, A., Ma- tuszewski, M., Rahmani, A.: Estimation of the second-order coherence function using quantum reservoir and ensemble methods. Physical Re- view Applied24(5), 054059 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Na- ture Communications12(1), 2631 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9

    Huang,H.-Y.,Broughton,M.,Mohseni,M.,Bab- bush, R., Boixo, S., Neven, H., McClean, J.R.: Power of data in quantum machine learning. Na- ture Communications12(1), 2631 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9 2021

  14. [14]

    Egger, Stefan Filipp, Frank K

    Fujii, K., Nakajima, K.: Harnessing disordered- ensemble quantum dynamics for machine learn- ing. Physical Review Applied8(2), 024030 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied. 8.024030 10

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied 2017

  15. [15]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19707 (2025)

    Gong,S.-Q.,Chen,M.-C.,Liu,H.-L.,Su,H.,Gu, Y.-C.,Tang,H.-Y.,Jia,M.-H.,Deng,Y.-H.,Wei, Q., Wang, H., Zhong, H.-S., Jiang, X., Li, L., Liu, N.-L., Lu, C.-Y., Pan, J.-W.: Enhanced im- age recognition using gaussian boson sampling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.19707 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Physi- cal Review Applied20(1), 014051 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.014051

    García-Beni, J., Giorgi, G.L., Soriano, M.C., Zambrini, R.: Scalable photonic platform for real-time quantum reservoir computing. Physi- cal Review Applied20(1), 014051 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.014051

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.20.014051 2023

  17. [17]

    Optica Quantum3(2), 201 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICAQ.553294

    Nerenberg,S.,Neill,O.D.,Marcucci,G.,Faccio, D.: Photon number-resolving quantum reservoir computing. Optica Quantum3(2), 201 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICAQ.553294

    work page doi:10.1364/opticaq.553294 2025

  18. [18]

    Optica Quantum3(3), 238 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICAQ

    Sakurai, A., Hayashi, A., Munro, W.J., Nemoto, K.: Quantum optical reservoir computing pow- ered by boson sampling. Optica Quantum3(3), 238 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICAQ. 541432

    work page doi:10.1364/opticaq 2025

  19. [20]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.19721 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.19721

    Świerczewski, S., Ko, D., Rahmani, A., López Carreño, J.C., Verstraelen, W., Deuar, P., Piętka, B., Liew, T.C.H., Matuszewski, M., Opala, A.: Quantum light detection with enhanced photonic neural network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.19721 (2026) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2601.19721

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.19721 2026

  20. [21]

    Quantum Science and Technology10(3), 035041 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/addffe

    Krisnanda, T., Song, P., Copetudo, A., Fontaine, C.Y., Paterek, T., Liew, T.C.H., Gao, Y.Y.: Experimental demonstration of enhanced quantum tomography via quan- tum reservoir processing. Quantum Science and Technology10(3), 035041 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/addffe

    work page doi:10.1088/2058-9565/addffe 2025

  21. [22]

    Communications Physics4(1), 105 (2021)

    Ghosh,S.,Krisnanda,T.,Paterek,T.,Liew,T.C.: Realisingandcompressingquantumcircuitswith quantum reservoir computing. Communications Physics4(1), 105 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [23]

    AdvancedQuantumTechnologies4(8),2100027 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202100027

    Mujal, P., Martínez-Peña, R., Nokkala, J., García-Beni, J., Giorgi, G.L., Soriano, M.C., Zambrini, R.: Opportunities in quantum reser- voir computing and extreme learning machines. AdvancedQuantumTechnologies4(8),2100027 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1002/qute.202100027

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.202100027 2021

  23. [24]

    Nature Communications9(1) (2018) https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4

    McClean, J.R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V.N., Babbush,R.,Neven,H.:Barrenplateausinquan- tum neural network training landscapes. Nature Communications9(1), 4812 (2018) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 2018

  24. [25]

    org/10.1038/s41467-022-35364-5

    Anschuetz, E.R., Kiani, B.T.: Quantum varia- tionalalgorithmsareswampedwithtraps.Nature Communications13(1), 7760 (2022) https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-022-35364-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35364-5 2022

  25. [26]

    Nature Physics 16(10), 1050–1057 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R., Preskill, J.: Pre- dicting many properties of a quantum system from very few measurements. Nature Physics 16(10), 1050–1057 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41567-020-0932-7

    work page 2020

  26. [27]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2503

    Recio-Armengol, E., Ahmed, S., Bowles, J.: Train on classical, deploy on quantum: scaling generative quantum machine learning to a thou- sand qubits (2026). https://arxiv.org/abs/2503. 02934

    work page 2026

  27. [28]

    Physical Review Let- ters123(25), 250503 (2019) https://doi.org/10

    Wang, H., Qin, J., Ding, X., Chen, M.-C., Chen, S.,You,L.,He,Y.-M.,Jiang,X.,You,L.,Wang, Z.,et al.: Boson sampling with 20 input pho- tons and a 60-mode interferometer in a10 14- dimensional hilbert space. Physical Review Let- ters123(25), 250503 (2019) https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.123.250503

    work page 2019

  28. [29]

    Nature Materials24, 1883–1897 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02306-7

    Wang, H., Ralph, T.C., Renema, J.J., Lu, C.-Y., Pan, J.-W.: Scalable photonic quantum technolo- gies. Nature Materials24, 1883–1897 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-025-02306-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41563-025-02306-7 2025

  29. [30]

    npj QuantumInformation5(1),60(2019)https://doi

    Steinbrecher,G.R.,Olson,J.P.,Englund,D.,Car- olan, J.: Quantum optical neural networks. npj QuantumInformation5(1),60(2019)https://doi. org/10.1038/s41534-019-0174-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0174-7 2019

  30. [31]

    EPJ Quantum Tech- nology9(1), 16 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/ 11 epjqt/s40507-022-00135-0

    Gan, B.Y., Leykam, D., Angelakis, D.G.: Fock state-enhanced expressivity of quantum ma- chine learning models. EPJ Quantum Tech- nology9(1), 16 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1140/ 11 epjqt/s40507-022-00135-0

    work page 2022

  31. [32]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08318 (2025)

    Rambach, M., Roy, A., Gilchrist, A., Saku- rai, A., Munro, W.J., Nemoto, K., White, A.G.: Photonicquantum-acceleratedmachinelearning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.08318 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [33]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07279 (2025)

    Paparelle, I., Henaff, J., Garcia-Beni, J., Gillet, E., Montesinos, D., Giorgi, G.L., Soriano, M.C., Zambrini, R., Parigi, V.: Experimental memory control in continuous variable opti- cal quantum reservoir computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.07279 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [34]

    Joly,M.,Makowski,A.,Courme,B.,Porstendor- fer, L., Wilksen, S., Charbon, E., Gies, C., De- fienne, H., Gigan, S.: Harnessing photon indis- tinguishability in quantum extreme learning ma- chines.arXivpreprintarXiv:2505.11238(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [35]

    Suprano, A., Zia, D., Innocenti, L., Lorenzo, S., Cimini, V., Giordani, T., Palmisano, I., Polino, E., Spagnolo, N., Sciarrino, F., Palma, G.M., Ferraro,A.,Paternostro,M.:Experimentalprop- erty reconstruction in a photonic quantum ex- tremelearningmachine.PhysicalReviewLetters 132(16), 160802 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.132.160802

    work page 2024

  35. [36]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18361 (2025)

    Suprano, A., Zia, D., Innocenti, L., Lorenzo, S., Cimini, V., Giordani, T., Palmisano, I., Polino, E., Spagnolo, N., Sciarrino, F., Palma, G.M., Ferraro, A., Paternostro, M.: Quantum extreme learning machines for photonic entanglement witnessing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.18361 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [37]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13695 (2025)

    Cimini, V., Sohoni, M.M., Presutti, F., Malia, B.K., Ma, S.-Y., Yanagimoto, R., Wang, T., Onodera, T., Wright, L.G., McMahon, P.L.: Large-scale quantum reservoir computing us- ing a gaussian boson sampler. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.13695 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [38]

    Negoro, K

    Negoro, M., Mitarai, K., Fujii, K., Nakajima, K., Kitagawa, M.: Machine learning with con- trollable quantum dynamics of a nuclear spin ensemble in a solid (2018). https://arxiv.org/abs/ 1806.10910

    work page arXiv 2018

  38. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18694 (2025)

    Selimović, M., Agresti, I., Siemaszko, M., Mor- ris, J., Dakić, B., Albiero, R., Crespi, A., Ceccarelli, F., Osellame, R., Stobińska, M., et al.: Experimental neuromorphic computing based on quantum memristor. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.18694 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [40]

    Maring, N., Fyrillas, A., Pont, M., Ivanov, E., Stepanov, P., Margaria, N., Hease, W., Pishcha- gin, A., Lemaître, A., Sagnes, I., Au, T.H., Boissier, S., Bertasi, E., Baert, A., Valdivia, M., Billard, M., Acar, O., Brieussel, A., Mezher, R., Wein, S.C., Salavrakos, A., Sinnott, P., Fioretto, D.A., Emeriau, P.-E., Belabas, N., Mansfield, S., Senellart, P....

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01403-4 2024

  40. [41]

    Lvovsky, A.I., Raymer, M.G.: Continuous- variable optical quantum-state tomography. Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 299–332 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.299

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.299 2009

  41. [42]

    Nature Reviews Physics5(1), 9–24 (2023)

    Elben, A., Flammia, S.T., Huang, H.-Y., Kueng, R.,Preskill,J.,Vermersch,B.,Zoller,P.:Theran- domized measurement toolbox. Nature Reviews Physics5(1), 9–24 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [43]

    Quantum7, 931 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-02-21-931

    Heurtel, N., Fyrillas, A., Gliniasty, G.d., Le Bi- han, R., Malherbe, S., Pailhas, M., Bertasi, E., Bourdoncle,B.,Emeriau,P.-E.,Mezher,R.,Mu- sic, L., Belabas, N., Valiron, B., Senellart, P., Mansfield,S.,Senellart,J.:Perceval:ASoftware Platform for Discrete Variable Photonic Quan- tum Computing. Quantum7, 931 (2023) https: //doi.org/10.22331/q-2023-02-21-931

    work page doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-21-931 2023

  43. [44]

    APL Photonics 6(7), 070804 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5

    Bell, B.A., Walmsley, I.A.: Further compact- ifying linear optical unitaries. APL Photonics 6(7), 070804 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1063/5. 0053421

    work page doi:10.1063/5 2021

  44. [45]

    Optica11(3), 427 (2024)https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.512148 12

    Fyrillas, A., Faure, O., Maring, N., Senel- lart, J., Belabas, N.: Scalable machine learning- assisted clear-box characterization for optimally controlled photonic circuits. Optica11(3), 427 (2024)https://doi.org/10.1364/OPTICA.512148 12

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.512148 2024