pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10652 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: 3 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Cavity-Induced Excitonic Insulation and Non-Fermi-Liquid Behavior in Dirac Materials

Yuxuan Guo , Ashida Yuto
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords Dirac fermionsexcitonic insulatornon-Fermi liquidcavity QEDmetasurfacesquantum phase transitionLandau levels
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cavity-mediated long-range interactions turn two-dimensional Dirac fermions into an excitonic insulator below a critical flavor number or a non-Fermi liquid above it.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines two-dimensional Dirac fermions placed inside a deep-subwavelength cavity formed by high-impedance metasurfaces. These metasurfaces support quasielectrostatic modes that produce a long-range interaction between the fermions, unlike conventional metallic boundaries. Combining static screening with a Dyson-Schwinger analysis, the work shows that this interaction changes the ground state qualitatively. Below a critical fermion flavor number of 16 over pi, the system undergoes an infinite-order quantum phase transition into an excitonic insulator that opens a mass gap. Above that value the fermions remain gapless yet enter a non-Fermi-liquid regime in which the quasiparticle residue vanishes and the dispersion becomes nonanalytic.

Core claim

The cavity-induced interaction, treated through static electronic screening and the Dyson-Schwinger equation, drives an excitonic insulating phase for fermion flavor number N_f below N_c equals 16 over pi via an infinite-order quantum phase transition that spontaneously generates a mass gap. For N_f above N_c the system stays gapless but develops non-Fermi-liquid behavior with singular suppression of the quasiparticle residue to zero and a nonanalytic dispersion of the Dirac cone. A perpendicular magnetic field causes cavity fluctuations to lift the degeneracy of the zeroth Landau level for every value of N_f.

What carries the argument

Dyson-Schwinger analysis of the cavity-mediated long-range interaction after static electronic screening in the deep-subwavelength limit.

If this is right

  • An infinite-order quantum phase transition at N_f equals 16 over pi separates the gapped excitonic insulator from the gapless non-Fermi-liquid regime.
  • In the non-Fermi-liquid phase the quasiparticle residue is driven to zero while the Dirac cone acquires a nonanalytic dispersion.
  • Cavity fluctuations lift the degeneracy of the zeroth Landau level under a perpendicular magnetic field for any flavor number.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cavity platform could let experimenters tune effective interaction strength to cross the critical flavor number in a single device.
  • Analogous engineering of long-range interactions might be attempted in other two-dimensional Dirac systems such as topological insulator surfaces to induce similar correlated phases.
  • The magnetic-field result suggests new routes to control Landau-level degeneracy and associated magneto-transport or optical responses.

Load-bearing premise

Static screening plus the Dyson-Schwinger equation accurately captures the cavity interaction without important contributions from dynamic screening or higher-order vertex corrections.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic detection of a finite mass gap for N_f below 16 over pi, or of vanishing quasiparticle weight together with nonanalytic dispersion for N_f above that value, inside a high-impedance metasurface cavity would confirm the phases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10652 by Ashida Yuto, Yuxuan Guo.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Dirac material embedded in a high-impedance meta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Phase landscape realized by the cavity confinement: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate two-dimensional Dirac fermions embedded in a deep-subwavelength cavity formed by high-impedance metasurfaces. We point out that, unlike conventional metallic boundaries, these metasurfaces support quasielectrostatic transverse-magnetic modes that mediate a long-range interaction between two-dimensional electrons. Combining static electronic screening with a Dyson-Schwinger analysis, we show that this engineered interaction can qualitatively alter the ground-state properties of Dirac materials. For a fermion flavor number $N_{f}$ below a critical value $N_{c}=16/\pi$, the interaction drives an excitonic insulating phase through an infinite-order quantum phase transition and spontaneously generates a mass gap. At $N_{f}>N_{c}$, the system remains gapless but enters a non-Fermi-liquid critical regime where the quasiparticle residue is singularly suppressed to zero, and the Dirac cone exhibits a nonanalytic dispersion relation. Furthermore, under a perpendicular magnetic field, the cavity fluctuations dynamically lift the zeroth Landau level degeneracy across all $N_{f}$. These results identify high-impedance metasurface cavities as promising platforms for engineering correlated Dirac matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates two-dimensional Dirac fermions placed in a deep-subwavelength cavity formed by high-impedance metasurfaces. It argues that the quasielectrostatic transverse-magnetic modes supported by these metasurfaces generate a long-range interaction between the fermions. By combining static electronic screening with a Dyson-Schwinger analysis, the authors conclude that for fermion flavor number N_f below the critical value N_c = 16/π the system undergoes an infinite-order quantum phase transition into an excitonic insulator with a spontaneously generated mass gap, while for N_f > N_c the system remains gapless but enters a non-Fermi-liquid regime characterized by a vanishing quasiparticle residue and nonanalytic dispersion. The work further claims that a perpendicular magnetic field dynamically lifts the degeneracy of the zeroth Landau level for all values of N_f.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated, the results would establish high-impedance metasurface cavities as a controllable platform for inducing and tuning correlated phases in Dirac materials, including excitonic insulation and non-Fermi-liquid behavior. This could open new routes for engineering quantum phase transitions in low-dimensional systems and provide testable predictions for cavity-QED experiments with graphene or related Dirac semimetals.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and theoretical framework] Abstract and the description of the theoretical approach: the central results (N_c = 16/π, infinite-order transition to excitonic insulation, and NFL regime) rest on inserting a statically screened cavity-mediated interaction into a frequency-independent Dyson-Schwinger gap equation. No explicit form of the gap equation, truncation scheme, or vertex approximation is supplied, nor is there a comparison to the retarded case arising from the dispersive ω(q) of the TM modes. This approximation is load-bearing for the reported phase boundaries and the character of the transition.
  2. [Dyson-Schwinger analysis and phase diagram] The claim that the transition remains infinite-order (BKT-like) for N_f < N_c assumes that the effective four-fermion interaction after static screening is sufficiently long-ranged and instantaneous. The manuscript does not report any test of whether including the Matsubara-frequency structure of the full photon propagator alters the infrared scaling or converts the transition to first-order.
  3. [Magnetic-field results] The statement that cavity fluctuations lift the zeroth Landau-level degeneracy for all N_f is presented without showing how the same static-screening approximation affects the Landau-level problem or whether dynamic screening would restore degeneracy at large N_f.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a short statement of the range of cavity parameters (impedance, subwavelength scale) for which the quasielectrostatic approximation holds.
  2. [Theoretical framework] Notation for the screened interaction and the self-energy ansatz should be defined explicitly before the numerical or analytic results are presented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment point by point below, committing to revisions where details are missing or additional justification is needed.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and theoretical framework] Abstract and the description of the theoretical approach: the central results (N_c = 16/π, infinite-order transition to excitonic insulation, and NFL regime) rest on inserting a statically screened cavity-mediated interaction into a frequency-independent Dyson-Schwinger gap equation. No explicit form of the gap equation, truncation scheme, or vertex approximation is supplied, nor is there a comparison to the retarded case arising from the dispersive ω(q) of the TM modes. This approximation is load-bearing for the reported phase boundaries and the character of the transition.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from greater explicitness. In the revised version we will supply the explicit Dyson-Schwinger gap equation obtained after static screening of the cavity-mediated photon propagator, state that the truncation is the leading-order ladder approximation with a bare vertex (standard for this class of problems), and add a paragraph justifying the static approximation. The justification rests on the quasielectrostatic character of the TM modes supported by high-impedance metasurfaces in the deep-subwavelength limit, where the relevant fermion energies lie well below the mode dispersion scale; we will note that a fully retarded treatment is computationally demanding and left for future work but does not alter the infrared scaling that determines N_c. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Dyson-Schwinger analysis and phase diagram] The claim that the transition remains infinite-order (BKT-like) for N_f < N_c assumes that the effective four-fermion interaction after static screening is sufficiently long-ranged and instantaneous. The manuscript does not report any test of whether including the Matsubara-frequency structure of the full photon propagator alters the infrared scaling or converts the transition to first-order.

    Authors: The infinite-order (essential-singularity) character follows directly from the analytic solution of the gap equation for a 1/|q| interaction in two dimensions, which produces the same infrared scaling as the classic BKT problem. We will add an explicit discussion of this scaling together with a brief analytic estimate showing that the Matsubara-frequency dependence of the screened propagator does not modify the infrared exponent or convert the transition to first order; the static limit remains dominant because the cavity modes are overdamped at the relevant momenta. A full numerical solution of the frequency-dependent equation is beyond the present scope but will be flagged as a natural extension. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Magnetic-field results] The statement that cavity fluctuations lift the zeroth Landau-level degeneracy for all N_f is presented without showing how the same static-screening approximation affects the Landau-level problem or whether dynamic screening would restore degeneracy at large N_f.

    Authors: We will expand the magnetic-field section to display the explicit matrix elements of the statically screened cavity interaction within the zeroth Landau level. Because the interaction remains long-ranged after screening, it mixes the degenerate states for any N_f; the degeneracy lifting is therefore independent of flavor number within the approximation used. We will add a short remark that dynamic corrections could quantitatively renormalize the splitting at large N_f but do not restore exact degeneracy, as the cavity-mediated term is still present. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies standard DSE to screened interaction

full rationale

The central results (excitonic gap for N_f < 16/π via infinite-order QPT, NFL regime for N_f > N_c) are obtained by inserting the cavity-mediated interaction (after static electronic screening) into the Dyson-Schwinger gap equation and solving for the critical flavor number and scaling. This is a direct application of an established non-perturbative method to the model Hamiltonian; the value 16/π emerges from the infrared analysis of the frequency-independent vertex rather than from any fitted parameter, self-definition, or load-bearing self-citation. No ansatz is smuggled via prior work, no prediction is renamed as a fit, and the derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated assumptions without reducing to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard quantum field theory techniques applied to a model of cavity modes whose precise form is taken as given.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Static electronic screening approximation suffices for the cavity-mediated interaction
    Invoked to combine with Dyson-Schwinger analysis for the ground-state properties
  • domain assumption Dyson-Schwinger equations capture the non-perturbative effects of the long-range interaction
    Central to deriving both the insulating phase and the non-Fermi-liquid regime

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5496 in / 1282 out tokens · 44416 ms · 2026-05-12T04:28:04.211859+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 124 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ma- nipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    work page 2021

  2. [2]

    Scheucher, J

    M. Scheucher, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Cav- ity quantum electrodynamics and chiral quantum op- tics, arXiv:2012.06546 [quant-ph] 10.1142/8964 (2020), arXiv:2012.06546 [quant-ph]

    work page doi:10.1142/8964 2012

  3. [3]

    D. M. Kennes and A. Rubio, A new era of quantum materials mastery and quantum simulators in and out of equilibrium, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.11928 (2022), arXiv:2204.11928 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    Ruggenthaler, N

    M. Ruggenthaler, N. Tancogne-Dejean, J. Flick, H. Ap- pel, and A. Rubio, From a quantum-electrodynamical light–matter description to novel spectroscopies, Nat Rev Chem2, 1 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Flick, D

    J. Flick, D. M. Welakuh, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Light–Matter Response in Nonrelativis- tic Quantum Electrodynamics, ACS Photonics6, 2757 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    N. S. Mueller, Y. Okamura, B. G. M. Vieira, S. Juer- gensen, H. Lange, E. B. Barros, F. Schulz, and S. Re- ich, Deep strong light–matter coupling in plasmonic nanoparticle crystals, Nature583, 780 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    J. C. Owens, M. G. Panetta, B. Saxberg, G. Roberts, S. Chakram, R. Ma, A. Vrajitoarea, J. Simon, and D. I. Schuster, Chiral cavity quantum electrodynamics, Nat. Phys. , 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    Ashida, T

    Y. Ashida, T. Yokota, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, and E. Demler, Nonperturbative waveguide quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023194 (2022)

    work page 2022

  9. [9]

    T. W. Ebbesen, Hybrid Light–Matter States in a Molec- ular and Material Science Perspective, Acc. Chem. Res. 49, 2403 (2016)

    work page 2016

  10. [10]

    Feist, J

    J. Feist, J. Galego, and F. J. Garcia-Vidal, Polaritonic Chemistry with Organic Molecules, ACS Photonics5, 205 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    R. F. Ribeiro, L. A. Mart´ ınez-Mart´ ınez, M. Du, J. Campos-Gonzalez-Angulo, and J. Yuen-Zhou, Polari- ton chemistry: Controlling molecular dynamics with op- tical cavities, Chem. Sci.9, 6325 (2018)

    work page 2018

  12. [12]

    Galego, F

    J. Galego, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. Feist, Cavity- Induced Modifications of Molecular Structure in the Strong-Coupling Regime, Phys. Rev. X5, 041022 (2015)

    work page 2015

  13. [13]

    Stockklauser, P

    A. Stockklauser, P. Scarlino, J. V. Koski, S. Gas- parinetti, C. K. Andersen, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, T. Ihn, K. Ensslin, and A. Wallraff, Strong coupling cav- ity qed with gate-defined double quantum dots enabled by a high impedance resonator, Phys. Rev. X7, 011030 (2017)

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    E. M. Purcell, Spontaneous emission probabilities at ra- dio frequencies, Phys. Rev.69, 681 (1946)

    work page 1946

  15. [15]

    Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A

    E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, A. Sriram, M. Claassen, and A. Ru- 6 bio, Controlling the magnetic state of the proximate quantum spin liquidα-RuCl 3 with an optical cavity, npj Computational Materials9, 202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Chiocchetta, D

    A. Chiocchetta, D. Kiese, C. P. Zelle, F. Piazza, and S. Diehl, Cavity-induced quantum spin liquids, Nat. Commun.12, 5901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    Mochida and Y

    J. Mochida and Y. Ashida, Cavity-enhanced kondo ef- fect, Phys. Rev. B110, 035158 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    J. B. Curtis, Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity Quantum Eliashberg En- hancement of Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 167002 (2019)

    work page 2019

  19. [19]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cav- ity quantum-electrodynamical polaritonically enhanced electron-phonon coupling and its influence on supercon- ductivity, Sci. Adv.4, eaau6969 (2018)

    work page 2018

  20. [20]

    Schlawin, A

    F. Schlawin, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Cavity- Mediated Electron-Photon Superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 133602 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    J. B. Curtis, A. Grankin, N. R. Poniatowski, V. M. Galitski, P. Narang, and E. Demler, Cavity magnon- polaritons in cuprate parent compounds, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013101 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    J. Li, L. Schamriß, and M. Eckstein, Effective theory of lattice electrons strongly coupled to quantum electro- magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. B105, 165121 (2022)

    work page 2022

  23. [23]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. ˙Imamo˘ glu, J. Faist, D. Jaksch, A. Caval- leri, and E. Demler, Quantum Electrodynamic Control of Matter: Cavity-Enhanced Ferroelectric Phase Tran- sition, Phys. Rev. X10, 041027 (2020)

    work page 2020

  24. [24]

    Latini, D

    S. Latini, D. Shin, S. A. Sato, C. Sch¨ afer, U. De Giovan- nini, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, The ferroelectric photo ground state of SrTiO3: Cavity materials engineering, PNAS118, e2105618118 (2021)

    work page 2021

  25. [26]

    Rokaj, M

    V. Rokaj, M. Penz, M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Quantum Electrodynamical Bloch Theory with Homogeneous Magnetic Fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 047202 (2019); Polaritonic Hofstadter butterfly and cavity control of the quantized Hall conductance, Phys. Rev. B105, 205424 (2022)

    work page 2019

  26. [27]

    C. A. Downing, T. J. Sturges, G. Weick, M. Stobi´ nska, and L. Mart´ ın-Moreno, Topological Phases of Polaritons in a Cavity Waveguide, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 217401 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [28]

    I. V. Tokatly, D. R. Gulevich, and I. Iorsh, Vacuum anomalous Hall effect in gyrotropic cavity, Phys. Rev. B104, L081408 (2021)

    work page 2021

  28. [29]

    Masuki and Y

    K. Masuki and Y. Ashida, Berry phase and topology in ultrastrongly coupled quantum light-matter systems, Phys. Rev. B107, 195104 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [30]

    H¨ ubener, U

    H. H¨ ubener, U. De Giovannini, C. Sch¨ afer, J. And- berger, M. Ruggenthaler, J. Faist, and A. Rubio, Engi- neering quantum materials with chiral optical cavities, Nat. Mater.20, 438 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [31]

    Dmytruk and M

    O. Dmytruk and M. Schir´ o, Gauge fixing for strongly correlated electrons coupled to quantum light, Phys. Rev. B103, 075131 (2021)

    work page 2021

  31. [32]

    G´ omez-Le´ on, M

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on, M. Schir` o, and O. Dmytruk, Majorana bound states from cavity embedding in an interacting two-site kitaev chain, Phys. Rev. B111, 155410 (2025)

    work page 2025

  32. [33]

    Bloch, A

    J. Bloch, A. Cavalleri, V. Galitski, M. Hafezi, and A. Rubio, Strongly correlated electron–photon systems, Nature606, 41 (2022)

    work page 2022

  33. [34]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Appl. Phys. Rev.9, 011312 (2022)

    work page 2022

  34. [35]

    H¨ ubener, E

    H. H¨ ubener, E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, M. Claassen, S. Latini, and A. Rubio, Quantum materials engineering by struc- tured cavity vacuum fluctuations, Materials for Quan- tum Technology4, 023002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [36]

    Riolo, A

    R. Riolo, A. Tomadin, G. Mazza, R. Asgari, A. H. Mac- Donald, and M. Polini, Tuning fermi liquids with po- laritonic cavities, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.122, e2407995122 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [37]

    C. J. Eckhardt, A. Grankin, D. M. Kennes, M. Ruggen- thaler, A. Rubio, M. A. Sentef, M. Hafezi, and M. H. Michael, Surface-mediated ultra-strong cavity coupling of two-dimensional itinerant electrons, arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.10615 (2024), arXiv:2409.10615 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  37. [38]

    H. Liu, F. Troisi, H. H¨ ubener, and A. Rubio, Cavity- mediated electron-electron interactions: Renormalizing dirac states in graphene, Science Advances11, eadz1855 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [39]

    Ashida, A

    Y. Ashida, A. m. c. ˙Imamo˘ glu, and E. Demler, Cavity quantum electrodynamics with hyperbolic van der waals materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 216901 (2023)

    work page 2023

  39. [40]

    B. Kass, S. Talkington, A. Srivastava, and M. Claassen, Many-body photon blockade and quantum light gener- ation from cavity quantum materials, arXiv:2411.08964 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  40. [41]

    Nambiar, A

    G. Nambiar, A. Grankin, and M. Hafezi, Diagnosing electronic phases of matter using photonic correlation functions, Phys. Rev. X15, 041020 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [42]

    Gambino, M

    S. Gambino, M. Mazzeo, A. Genco, O. Di Stefano, S. Savasta, S. Patan` e, D. Ballarini, F. Mangione, G. Ler- ario, D. Sanvitto, and G. Gigli, Exploring Light–Matter Interaction Phenomena under Ultrastrong Coupling Regime, ACS Photonics1, 1042 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [43]

    Chikkaraddy, B

    R. Chikkaraddy, B. de Nijs, F. Benz, S. J. Barrow, O. A. Scherman, E. Rosta, A. Demetriadou, P. Fox, O. Hess, and J. J. Baumberg, Single-molecule strong coupling at room temperature in plasmonic nanocavities, Nature 535, 127 (2016)

    work page 2016

  43. [44]

    Yoshihara, T

    F. Yoshihara, T. Fuse, S. Ashhab, K. Kakuyanagi, S. Saito, and K. Semba, Superconducting qubit–oscillator circuit beyond the ultrastrong-coupling regime, Nat. Phys.13, 44 (2017)

    work page 2017

  44. [45]

    Bayer, M

    A. Bayer, M. Pozimski, S. Schambeck, D. Schuh, R. Huber, D. Bougeard, and C. Lange, Tera- hertz Light–Matter Interaction beyond Unity Coupling Strength, Nano Lett.17, 6340 (2017)

    work page 2017

  45. [46]

    Halbhuber, J

    M. Halbhuber, J. Mornhinweg, V. Zeller, C. Ciuti, D. Bougeard, R. Huber, and C. Lange, Non-adiabatic stripping of a cavity field from electrons in the deep- strong coupling regime, Nat. Photon.14, 675 (2020)

    work page 2020

  46. [47]

    Genco, A

    A. Genco, A. Ridolfo, S. Savasta, S. Patan` e, G. Gigli, and M. Mazzeo, Bright Polariton Coumarin-Based OLEDs Operating in the Ultrastrong Coupling Regime, Adv. Opt. Mater.6, 1800364 (2018)

    work page 2018

  47. [48]

    Flick, M

    J. Flick, M. Ruggenthaler, H. Appel, and A. Rubio, Atoms and molecules in cavities, from weak to strong coupling in quantum-electrodynamics (QED) chemistry, 7 PNAS114, 3026 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [49]

    Forn-D´ ıaz, L

    P. Forn-D´ ıaz, L. Lamata, E. Rico, J. Kono, and E. Solano, Ultrastrong coupling regimes of light-matter interaction, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 025005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [50]

    Frisk Kockum, A

    A. Frisk Kockum, A. Miranowicz, S. De Liberato, S. Savasta, and F. Nori, Ultrastrong coupling between light and matter, Nat. Rev. Phys.1, 19 (2019)

    work page 2019

  50. [51]

    S´ aez-Bl´ azquez, D

    R. S´ aez-Bl´ azquez, D. de Bernardis, J. Feist, and P. Rabl, Can we observe nonperturbative vacuum shifts in cavity qed?, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 013602 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [52]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht,Principles of Nano-Optics, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2012)

    work page 2012

  52. [53]

    D. N. Basov, A. Asenjo-Garcia, P. J. Schuck, X. Zhu, and A. Rubio, Polariton panorama, Nanophotonics10, 549 (2021)

    work page 2021

  53. [54]

    Reserbat-Plantey, I

    A. Reserbat-Plantey, I. Epstein, I. Torre, A. T. Costa, P. A. Gon¸ calves, N. A. Mortensen, M. Polini, J. C. Song, N. M. Peres, and F. H. Koppens, Quantum nanophoton- ics in two-dimensional materials, ACS Photonics8, 85 (2021)

    work page 2021

  54. [55]

    Rivera and I

    N. Rivera and I. Kaminer, Light–matter interactions with photonic quasiparticles, Nat. Rev. Phys.2, 538 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [56]

    Helmrich, H

    F. Helmrich, H. S. Adlong, I. Khanonkin, M. Kro- ner, G. Scalari, J. Faist, A. Imamo˘ glu, and T. F. Nova, Cavity-driven attractive interactions in quan- tum materials, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.00189 (2024), arXiv:2408.00189 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

    work page arXiv 2024

  56. [57]

    G. M. Andolina, Z. Bacciconi, A. Nardin, M. Schir` o, P. Rabl, and D. De Bernardis, Electrostatics-induced breakdown of the integer quantum hall effect in cav- ity QED, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.04744 (2025), arXiv:2511.04744 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2025

  57. [58]

    Cheng, E

    X. Cheng, E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, F. Y. Gao, E. Baldini, D. M. Kennes, and A. Rubio, Anyonic chern insulator in graphene induced by surface electromagnon vacuum fluctuations, arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.10836 (2025), arXiv:2511.10836 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  58. [59]

    Cortese, N.-L

    E. Cortese, N.-L. Tran, J.-M. Manceau, A. Bousseksou, I. Carusotto, G. Biasiol, R. Colombelli, and S. De Lib- erato, Excitons bound by photon exchange, Nature Physics17, 31 (2021)

    work page 2021

  59. [60]

    Cortese, I

    E. Cortese, I. Carusotto, R. Colombelli, and S. De Lib- erato, Strong coupling of ionising transitions, Optica6, 354 (2023), arXiv:1809.08876 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2023

  60. [61]

    Sievenpiper, L

    D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, R. F. J. Broas, N. G. Alex´ opolous, and E. Yablonovitch, High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band, IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Techn.47, 2059 (1999)

    work page 2059

  61. [62]

    Sievenpiper,High-Impedance Electromagnetic Sur- faces(PhD Thesis, University of California, Los An- geles, 1999)

    D. Sievenpiper,High-Impedance Electromagnetic Sur- faces(PhD Thesis, University of California, Los An- geles, 1999)

    work page 1999

  62. [63]

    T. Cui, D. Martin-Cano, F. J. Garcia-Vidal, and J. B. Pendry, Spoof surface plasmon photonics, Rev. Mod. Phys.94, 025004 (2022)

    work page 2022

  63. [64]

    T.-J. Yen, W. Padilla, N. Fang, D. Vier, D. Smith, J. Pendry, D. Basov, and X. Zhang, Terahertz mag- netic response from artificial materials, Science303, 1494 (2004)

    work page 2004

  64. [65]

    Scalari, C

    G. Scalari, C. Maissen, D. Turˇ cinkov´ a, D. Hagenm¨ uller, S. De Liberato, C. Ciuti, C. Reichl, D. Schuh, W. Wegscheider, M. Beck, and J. Faist, Ultrastrong Coupling of the Cyclotron Transition of a 2D Electron Gas to a THz Metamaterial, Science335, 1323 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [66]

    Scalari, C

    G. Scalari, C. Maissen, S. Cibella, R. Leoni, P. Carelli, F. Valmorra, M. Beck, and J. Faist, Superconducting complementary metasurfaces for THz ultrastrong light- matter coupling, New Journal of Physics16, 033005 (2014)

    work page 2014

  66. [67]

    H.-T. Chen, H. Yang, R. Singh, J. F. O’Hara, A. K. Azad, S. A. Trugman, Q. X. Jia, and A. J. Taylor, Tun- ing the resonance in high-temperature superconducting terahertz metamaterials, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 247402 (2010)

    work page 2010

  67. [68]

    Z. Fang, Y. Wang, A. E. Schlather, Z. Liu, P. M. Ajayan, F. J. Garc´ ıa de Abajo, P. Nordlander, X. Zhu, and N. J. Halas, Active tunable absorption enhancement with graphene nanodisk arrays, Nano Letters14, 299 (2014)

    work page 2014

  68. [69]

    L. Ju, B. Geng, J. Horng, C. Girit, M. Martin, Z. Hao, H. A. Bechtel, X. Liang, A. Zettl, Y. R. Shen,et al., Graphene plasmonics for tunable terahertz metamate- rials, Nature nanotechnology6, 630 (2011)

    work page 2011

  69. [70]

    J. D. Caldwell, A. V. Kretinin, Y. Chen, V. Giannini, M. M. Fogler, Y. Francescato, C. T. Ellis, J. G. Tischler, K. S. Novoselov, S. A. Maier,et al., Sub-diffractional volume-confined polaritons in the natural hyperbolic material hexagonal boron nitride, Nature Communica- tions5, 5221 (2014)

    work page 2014

  70. [71]

    S. Dai, Z. Fei, Q. Ma, A. Rodin, M. Wagner, A. McLeod, M. Liu, W. Gannett, W. Regan, K. Watanabe,et al., Tunable phonon polaritons in ultrathin van der waals crystals of boron nitride, Science343, 1125 (2014)

    work page 2014

  71. [72]

    A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R. Peres, K. S. Novoselov, and A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, Reviews of Modern Physics81, 109 (2009)

    work page 2009

  72. [73]

    N. P. Armitage, E. J. Mele, and A. Vishwanath, Weyl and dirac semimetals, Reviews of Modern Physics90, 015001 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [74]

    B. Q. Lv, T. Qian, and H. Ding, Experimental perspec- tive on three-dimensional topological semimetals, Re- views of Modern Physics93, 025002 (2021)

    work page 2021

  74. [75]

    V. N. Kotov, B. Uchoa, V. M. Pereira, F. Guinea, and A. H. Castro Neto, Electron-electron interactions in graphene: Current status and perspectives, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1067 (2012)

    work page 2012

  75. [76]

    D. V. Khveshchenko, Massive Dirac fermions in single- layer graphene, J. Phys. Condens. Matter21, 075303 (2009)

    work page 2009

  76. [77]

    D. V. Khveshchenko, Ghost excitonic insulator transi- tion in layered graphite, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 246802 (2001)

    work page 2001

  77. [78]

    Gonzalez, F

    J. Gonzalez, F. Guinea, and M. A. H. Vozmediano, Non- Fermi liquid behavior of electrons in the half filled hon- eycomb lattice (A Renormalization group approach), Nucl. Phys. B424, 595 (1994)

    work page 1994

  78. [79]

    E. H. Hwang, B. Y.-K. Hu, and S. Das Sarma, Inelastic carrier lifetime in graphene, Phys. Rev. B76, 115434 (2007)

    work page 2007

  79. [80]

    B. L. Altshuler, L. B. Ioffe, and A. J. Millis, Low-energy properties of fermions with singular interactions, Phys- ical Review B50, 14048 (1994)

    work page 1994

  80. [81]

    Y. B. Kim, A. Furusaki, X.-G. Wen, and P. A. Lee, Gauge-invariant response functions of fermions coupled to a gauge field, Physical Review B50, 17917 (1994)

    work page 1994

Showing first 80 references.