pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10657 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.optics

Recognition: no theorem link

Physical relevance of time-independent scattering predictions in periodic mathcal{PT}-symmetric chains

Chao Zheng

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.optics
keywords PT symmetrynon-Hermitian scatteringtime-growing bound statesS-matrix polesperiodic chainsgain-loss systemsphysical relevance
0
0 comments X

The pith

PT-symmetric chains support physical scattering only below a gain-loss threshold that vanishes for large N.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that time-independent scattering predictions in periodic PT-symmetric systems become unphysical when time-growing bound states appear. These states are marked by S-matrix poles in the first quadrant of the complex wave-number plane. The authors derive the exact onset threshold gamma_c equals 2 sin of pi over 4N for a chain of N unit cells. This threshold scales as pi over 2N for large N and reaches zero in the thermodynamic limit. Time-dependent simulations confirm the boundary, revealing that many earlier predictions of localization and perfect absorption in large structures occur in unphysical regimes.

Core claim

For a PT-symmetric chain of N unit cells with gain/loss strength gamma, the region of physical relevance for time-independent scattering is bounded by the TGBS onset threshold gamma_c = 2 sin[pi/(4N)]. This threshold scales as pi/(2N) for large N and vanishes in the thermodynamic limit. Enlarging the structure thus enriches stationary scattering phenomenology but inevitably triggers TGBSs at weaker gain/loss. Many previously reported predictions of gain-loss-induced localization, reflectionless transport, and coherent perfect absorbers and lasers in large periodic structures therefore fall outside the physically relevant regime.

What carries the argument

The TGBS onset threshold gamma_c = 2 sin[pi/(4N)], determined by the condition for S-matrix poles entering the first quadrant of the complex wave-number plane.

Load-bearing premise

That S-matrix poles in the first quadrant of the complex wave-number plane correspond exactly to time-growing bound states that render all time-independent scattering predictions unphysical.

What would settle it

A time-dependent simulation or experiment showing stable non-growing wave-packet evolution in the presence of a first-quadrant S-matrix pole would disprove the claimed direct link between such poles and unphysical behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10657 by Chao Zheng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the periodic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Trajectories of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Critical gain/loss strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Time-dependent wave-packet simulations for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: illustrates these three regimes at γ = 0.3. For E = 1.93, the Bloch-like index is real (µ ≈ 0.217) and T oscillates as a function of N with quasiperiod π/(2µ) ≈ 7.2 unit cells. At the band edge E = p 4 − γ 2 ≈ 1.977, the index vanishes and T = 1 for all N. For E = 1.98, the energy lies in the evanescent regime (µ = iϕ, ϕ ≈ 0.051) and T decreases exponentially with N. All three curves, however, are subject … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: illustrates both mechanisms at γ = 1. For N = 1 [panel (a)], only the band-edge condition contributes, giving T = 1 with RR = 0 at E = Eedge = ± √ 3. For N = 2 [panel (b)], an additional pair of Fabry-Perot resonances ap- ´ pears at E = EFP = ±1, where both RL and RR vanish. These two cases differ qualitatively when judged against the TGBS onset condition. The parameters (N, γ) = (1, 1) and (2, 1) are mark… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time-independent scattering methods are widely used to analyze transport in periodic $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric systems. However, their predictions become unphysical when the system supports time-growing bound states (TGBSs), which manifest as $S$-matrix poles in the first quadrant of the complex wave-number plane. Here, we analytically delineate the region of physical relevance for a $\mathcal{PT}$-symmetric chain of $N$ unit cells with gain/loss strength $\gamma$. We derive the TGBS onset threshold $\gamma_c = 2\sin[\pi/(4N)]$, which scales as $\pi/(2N)$ for large $N$ and vanishes in the thermodynamic limit. Enlarging the structure thus enriches stationary scattering phenomenology but inevitably triggers TGBSs at weaker gain/loss. Time-dependent wave-packet simulations confirm this analytical boundary quantitatively. Applying this criterion, we show that many previously reported predictions of gain-loss-induced localization, reflectionless transport, and coherent perfect absorbers and lasers in large periodic structures fall outside the physically relevant regime. $S$-matrix pole analysis is therefore an indispensable prerequisite for interpreting time-independent scattering predictions in periodic non-Hermitian systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives an exact threshold γ_c = 2 sin[π/(4N)] for the onset of time-growing bound states (TGBSs) in a finite periodic PT-symmetric chain of N unit cells. It shows via S-matrix pole analysis that time-independent scattering predictions become unphysical above this threshold, which scales as π/(2N) for large N and vanishes in the thermodynamic limit. Time-dependent wave-packet simulations are used to quantitatively confirm the boundary, and the criterion is applied to argue that many prior predictions of gain-loss-induced localization, reflectionless transport, and coherent perfect absorption/lasing in large structures lie outside the physically relevant regime.

Significance. If the central result holds, the work supplies a concrete, size-dependent criterion that limits the applicability of stationary scattering methods in non-Hermitian periodic systems. The combination of an analytic, parameter-free threshold with direct numerical verification of the pole-to-growth mapping is a clear strength. This finding implies that enlarging the structure enriches the stationary phenomenology only at the cost of introducing unphysical TGBSs at progressively weaker gain/loss, which has direct consequences for interpreting existing and future literature on PT-symmetric transport.

minor comments (3)
  1. Abstract: the statement of the threshold γ_c = 2 sin[π/(4N)] is given without any indication of the derivation route or the quantitative level of simulation agreement; a single additional clause would improve standalone readability.
  2. When the criterion is applied to prior literature, the manuscript should list the specific N and γ values (or ranges) used in the cited works so that readers can immediately verify that those points lie above γ_c.
  3. The large-N asymptotic γ_c ∼ π/(2N) follows directly from the small-angle expansion of the sine; a brief parenthetical remark confirming this approximation would remove any ambiguity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading, positive evaluation, and recommendation of minor revision. The provided summary accurately reflects the central results and implications of the manuscript.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; analytic derivation independently verified

full rationale

The central result is an analytic derivation of the TGBS threshold γ_c = 2 sin[π/(4N)] obtained by locating the onset of first-quadrant S-matrix poles in the finite-N PT-symmetric chain. This follows directly from the characteristic equation of the transfer matrix or recurrence relation for the periodic structure and is not defined in terms of the target quantity, fitted to data, or imported via self-citation. Independent time-dependent wave-packet simulations quantitatively confirm the same boundary, providing external validation rather than a self-referential loop. Application of the threshold to prior literature is a straightforward comparison once the new criterion is accepted; no load-bearing step reduces to a prior result by the authors or to a renamed empirical pattern. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim rests on the domain assumption that first-quadrant S-matrix poles identify time-growing bound states whose presence invalidates time-independent scattering. No free parameters appear in the threshold formula. TGBSs are introduced as the physical entities tied to those poles.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption S-matrix poles in the first quadrant of the complex wave-number plane correspond to time-growing bound states that make time-independent predictions unphysical
    This identification is invoked to delineate the region of physical relevance for scattering predictions.
invented entities (1)
  • Time-growing bound states (TGBSs) no independent evidence
    purpose: To mark the boundary beyond which time-independent scattering becomes unphysical
    Defined via S-matrix poles; no independent falsifiable signature outside the pole location is supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5500 in / 1281 out tokens · 31034 ms · 2026-05-12T04:05:32.242750+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    These two cases differ qualitatively when judged against the TGBS onset condition

    ForN= 2 [panel (b)], an additional pair of Fabry-P ´erot resonances ap- pears atE=E FP =±1, where bothR L andR R vanish. These two cases differ qualitatively when judged against the TGBS onset condition. The parameters(N, γ) = (1,1) and(2,1)are marked by the blue square and red triangle in Fig. 4. ForN= 1,γ c = √ 2≈1.414andγ= 1lies inside the TGBS-free re...

    work page

  2. [2]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Mus- slimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non-Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys.14, 11 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    K.¨Ozdemir, S

    S ¸. K.¨Ozdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity–time sym- metry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater.18, 783 (2019)

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    Ashida, Z

    Y . Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69, 249 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Rotter, A non-Hermitian Hamilton operator and the physics of open quantum systems, J

    I. Rotter, A non-Hermitian Hamilton operator and the physics of open quantum systems, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.42, 153001 (2009)

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    Moiseyev,Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011)

    N. Moiseyev,Non-Hermitian Quantum Mechanics(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2011)

    work page 2011

  8. [8]

    C. M. Bender, Making sense of non-Hermitian Hamiltonians, Rep. Prog. Phys.70, 947 (2007)

    work page 2007

  9. [9]

    W. D. Heiss, The physics of exceptional points, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.45, 444016 (2012)

    work page 2012

  10. [10]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Al `u, Exceptional points in optics and pho- tonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    work page 2019

  11. [11]

    T. E. Lee, Anomalous edge state in a non-Hermitian lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 133903 (2016)

    work page 2016

  12. [12]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 086803 (2018)

    work page 2018

  13. [13]

    F. K. Kunst, E. Edvardsson, J. C. Budich, and E. J. Bergholtz, Biorthogonal bulk-boundary correspondence in non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026808 (2018)

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Zhang, M.-H. Lu, and Y .-F. Chen, A review on non-Hermitian skin effect, Adv. Phys.: X7, 2109431 (2022)

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Topological band theory for non- Hermitian Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 146402 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-Hermitian Chern bands, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 136802 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    Takata and M

    K. Takata and M. Notomi, Photonic topological insulating phase induced solely by gain and loss, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 213902 (2018)

    work page 2018

  18. [18]

    Z. Gong, Y . Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Higashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non-Hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X8, 031079 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    Kawabata, K

    K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Symmetry and topology in non-Hermitian physics, Phys. Rev. X9, 041015 (2019)

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    Liu, Y .-R

    T. Liu, Y .-R. Zhang, Q. Ai, Z. Gong, K. Kawabata, M. Ueda, and F. Nori, Second-order topological phases in non-Hermitian 10 systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 076801 (2019)

    work page 2019

  21. [21]

    L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-Hermitian photonics based on parity–time symmetry, Nat. Photonics11, 752 (2017)

    work page 2017

  22. [22]

    X. Zhu, H. Ramezani, C. Shi, J. Zhu, and X. Zhang,PT- symmetric acoustics, Phys. Rev. X4, 031042 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [23]

    Fleury, D

    R. Fleury, D. Sounas, and A. Al `u, An invisible acoustic sensor based on parity-time symmetry, Nat. Commun.6, 5905 (2015)

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    S. A. Cummer, J. Christensen, and A. Al `u, Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials, Nat. Rev. Mater.1, 16001 (2016)

    work page 2016

  25. [25]

    Aur´egan and V

    Y . Aur´egan and V . Pagneux,PT-symmetric scattering in flow duct acoustics, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 174301 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Schindler, A

    J. Schindler, A. Li, M. C. Zheng, F. M. Ellis, and T. Kottos, Ex- perimental study of active LRC circuits withPTsymmetries, Phys. Rev. A84, 040101 (2011)

    work page 2011

  27. [27]

    Y . Choi, C. Hahn, J. W. Yoon, and S. H. Song, Observation of an anti-PT-symmetric exceptional point and energy-difference conserving dynamics in electrical circuit resonators, Nat. Com- mun.9, 2182 (2018)

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    Sakhdari, M

    M. Sakhdari, M. Hajizadegan, Q. Zhong, D. N. Christodoulides, R. El-Ganainy, and P.-Y . Chen, Experi- mental observation ofP Tsymmetry breaking near divergent exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 193901 (2019)

    work page 2019

  29. [29]

    W. Chen, M. Abbasi, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quan- tum jumps in the non-Hermitian dynamics of a superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 140504 (2021)

    work page 2021

  30. [30]

    W. Chen, M. Abbasi, B. Ha, S. Erdamar, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Decoherence-induced exceptional points in a dis- sipative superconducting qubit, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 110402 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [31]

    Abbasi, W

    M. Abbasi, W. Chen, M. Naghiloo, Y . N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Topological quantum state control through exceptional- point proximity, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 160401 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    Z.-Z. Li, W. Chen, M. Abbasi, K. W. Murch, and K. B. Whaley, Speeding up entanglement generation by proximity to higher- order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 100202 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [33]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non-Hermitian Hamiltonians havingPTsymmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

    work page 1998

  34. [34]

    C. M. Bender, D. C. Brody, and H. F. Jones, Complex extension of quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 270401 (2002)

    work page 2002

  35. [35]

    C. M. Bender and D. W. Hook,PT-symmetric quantum me- chanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 045002 (2024)

    work page 2024

  36. [36]

    K. G. Makris, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and Z. H. Musslimani, Beam dynamics inPTsymmetric optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.100, 103904 (2008)

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Longhi,PT-symmetric laser absorber, Phys

    S. Longhi,PT-symmetric laser absorber, Phys. Rev. A82, 031801 (2010)

    work page 2010

  38. [38]

    Y . D. Chong, L. Ge, and A. D. Stone,PT-symmetry breaking and laser-absorber modes in optical scattering systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 093902 (2011)

    work page 2011

  39. [39]

    Z. Lin, H. Ramezani, T. Eichelkraut, T. Kottos, H. Cao, and D. N. Christodoulides, Unidirectional invisibility induced byPT-symmetric periodic structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 213901 (2011)

    work page 2011

  40. [40]

    Feng, Y .-L

    L. Feng, Y .-L. Xu, W. S. Fegadolli, M.-H. Lu, J. E. B. Oliveira, V . R. Almeida, Y .-F. Chen, and A. Scherer, Experi- mental demonstration of a unidirectional reflectionless parity- time metamaterial at optical frequencies, Nat. Mater.12, 108 (2013)

    work page 2013

  41. [41]

    Fleury, D

    R. Fleury, D. L. Sounas, and A. Al `u, Negative refraction and planar focusing based on parity-time symmetric metasurfaces, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 023903 (2014)

    work page 2014

  42. [42]

    Garmon, M

    S. Garmon, M. Gianfreda, and N. Hatano, Bound states, scatter- ing states, and resonant states inPT-symmetric open quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A92, 022125 (2015)

    work page 2015

  43. [43]

    B. Zhu, R. L ¨u, and S. Chen,PT-symmetry breaking for the scattering problem in a one-dimensional non-Hermitian lattice model, Phys. Rev. A93, 032129 (2016)

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Shobe, K

    K. Shobe, K. Kuramoto, K.-I. Imura, and N. Hatano, Non- Hermitian Fabry-P´erot resonances in aP T-symmetric system, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 013223 (2021)

    work page 2021

  45. [45]

    J. Y . Lee and P.-Y . Chen, Optical forces and directionality in one-dimensionalPT-symmetric photonics, Phys. Rev. B104, 245426 (2021)

    work page 2021

  46. [46]

    V ´azquez-Candanedo, J

    O. V ´azquez-Candanedo, J. C. Hern ´andez-Herrej´on, F. M. Izrailev, and D. N. Christodoulides, Gain- or loss-induced local- ization in one-dimensionalPT-symmetric tight-binding mod- els, Phys. Rev. A89, 013832 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    Achilleos, Y

    V . Achilleos, Y . Aur´egan, and V . Pagneux, Scattering by fi- nite periodicPT-symmetric structures, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 243904 (2017)

    work page 2017

  48. [48]

    J. Y . Lee and P.-Y . Chen, Wave propagation, bi-directional reflectionless, and coherent perfect absorption-lasing in finite periodic PT-symmetric photonic systems, Nanophotonics12, 3099 (2023)

    work page 2023

  49. [49]

    V ´azquez-Candanedo, F

    O. V ´azquez-Candanedo, F. Izrailev, and D. Christodoulides, Spectral and transport properties of the PT-symmetric dimer model, Phys. E (Amsterdam, Neth.)72, 7 (2015)

    work page 2015

  50. [50]

    O. V . Shramkova and G. P. Tsironis, Scattering properties of PT- symmetric layered periodic structures, J. Opt. (Bristol, U. K.)18, 105101 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Perez-Garrido, P

    A. Perez-Garrido, P. Guo, V . Gasparian, and E. J ´odar, Polar magneto-optic Kerr and Faraday effects in finite periodicPT- symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. A107, 053504 (2023)

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    Ge and L

    L. Ge and L. Feng, Contrasting eigenvalue and singular-value spectra for lasing and antilasing in aPT-symmetric periodic structure, Phys. Rev. A95, 013813 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    H. Wu, X. Yang, Y . Tang, X. Tang, D. Deng, H. Liu, and Z. Wei, The scattering problem in PT-symmetric periodic struc- tures of 1D two-material waveguide networks, Ann. Phys.531, 1900120 (2019)

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    B. P. Nguyen and K. Kim, Transport and localization of waves in ladder-shaped lattices with locallyPT-symmetric potentials, Phys. Rev. A94, 062122 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    Moreno-Rodr´ıguez, F

    L. Moreno-Rodr´ıguez, F. Izrailev, and J. M´endez-Berm´udez, PT –symmetric tight-binding model with asymmetric couplings, Phys. Lett. A384, 126495 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Lazo and F

    E. Lazo and F. R. Humire, Characterization of unidirectional and bidirectional transparencies inPT-symmetric quantum and classical systems, Phys. Scr.98, 035028 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Moreno-Rodr´ıguez, J

    L. Moreno-Rodr´ıguez, J. M´endez-Berm´udez, and F. Izrailev, PT - symmetric tight-binding 1D chains: Coupling to the contin- uum and superradiance transition, Opt. Commun.561, 130500 (2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    J. Y . Lee, Unidirectional polarization beam splitter via an ex- ceptional point and finite periodicity of non-HermitianPT symmetry, Phys. Rev. A110, 033521 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    H. Wu, X. Yang, D. Deng, and H. Liu, Reflectionless phenomenon inPT-symmetric periodic structures of one- dimensional two-material optical waveguide networks, Phys. Rev. A100, 033832 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [60]

    Zheng, X

    J. Zheng, X. Yang, D. Deng, and H. Liu, Singular properties generated by finite periodic PT-symmetric optical waveguide network, Opt. Express27, 1538 (2019)

    work page 2019

  61. [61]

    P. Guo, V . Gasparian, E. J´odar, and C. Wisehart, Tunneling time inPT-symmetric systems, Phys. Rev. A107, 032210 (2023)

    work page 2023

  62. [62]

    Markoˇs and C

    P. Markoˇs and C. M. Soukoulis,Wave Propagation: From Elec- trons to Photonic Crystals and Left-Handed Materials(Prince- 11 ton University Press, Princeton, 2008)

    work page 2008

  63. [63]

    Zheng, Physical relevance of time-independent scattering calculations in non-Hermitian systems: The role of time- growing bound states, Phys

    C. Zheng, Physical relevance of time-independent scattering calculations in non-Hermitian systems: The role of time- growing bound states, Phys. Rev. A112, 042228 (2025)

    work page 2025

  64. [64]

    L. Ge, Y . D. Chong, and A. D. Stone, Conservation relations and anisotropic transmission resonances in one-dimensionalPT- symmetric photonic heterostructures, Phys. Rev. A85, 023802 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [65]

    Sasada, N

    K. Sasada, N. Hatano, and G. Ordonez, Resonant spectrum analysis of the conductance of an open quantum system and three types of fano parameter, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.80, 104707 (2011)

    work page 2011

  66. [66]

    Hatano and G

    N. Hatano and G. Ordonez, Time-reversal symmetric resolu- tion of unity without background integrals in open quantum systems, J. Math. Phys.55, 122106 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [67]

    A. J. F. Siegert, On the derivation of the dispersion formula for nuclear reactions, Phys. Rev.56, 750 (1939)

    work page 1939

  68. [68]

    Mostafazadeh, Spectral singularities of complex scattering potentials and infinite reflection and transmission coefficients at real energies, Phys

    A. Mostafazadeh, Spectral singularities of complex scattering potentials and infinite reflection and transmission coefficients at real energies, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 220402 (2009)

    work page 2009

  69. [69]

    Longhi, Spectral singularities in a non-Hermitian Friedrichs- Fano-Anderson model, Phys

    S. Longhi, Spectral singularities in a non-Hermitian Friedrichs- Fano-Anderson model, Phys. Rev. B80, 165125 (2009)

    work page 2009

  70. [70]

    Ramezani, H.-K

    H. Ramezani, H.-K. Li, Y . Wang, and X. Zhang, Unidirectional spectral singularities, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 263905 (2014)

    work page 2014

  71. [71]

    P. Wang, L. Jin, G. Zhang, and Z. Song, Wave emission and absorption at spectral singularities, Phys. Rev. A94, 053834 (2016)

    work page 2016

  72. [72]

    Jin and Z

    L. Jin and Z. Song, Incident direction independent wave prop- agation and unidirectional lasing, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 073901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  73. [73]

    Y . D. Chong, L. Ge, H. Cao, and A. D. Stone, Coherent perfect absorbers: Time-reversed lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 053901 (2010)

    work page 2010

  74. [74]

    H. Li, S. Suwunnarat, R. Fleischmann, H. Schanz, and T. Kot- tos, Random matrix theory approach to chaotic coherent perfect absorbers, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 044101 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    D. G. Baranov, A. Krasnok, T. Shegai, A. Al `u, and Y . Chong, Coherent perfect absorbers: Linear control of light with light, Nat. Rev. Mater.2, 17064 (2017)

    work page 2017

  76. [76]

    M. A. Sim ´on, A. Buend´ıa, A. Kiely, A. Mostafazadeh, and J. G. Muga,S-matrix pole symmetries for non-Hermitian scattering Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A99, 052110 (2019)

    work page 2019

  77. [77]

    Jin, Asymmetric lasing at spectral singularities, Phys

    L. Jin, Asymmetric lasing at spectral singularities, Phys. Rev. A 97, 033840 (2018)

    work page 2018