pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.11216 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ⚛️ nucl-th · astro-ph.SR· cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

The mean-field theory of superfluid-superconducting vortex states in the outer core of neutron stars

Dmitry Kobyakov
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th astro-ph.SRcond-mat.supr-con
keywords neutron starsvortex statessuperfluiditysuperconductivitymean-field theoryouter coreentrainmentLondon approximation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neutron vortex cores exceed the magnetic penetration depth throughout the outer core of neutron stars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends mean-field theory to vortex states in which neutrons and protons form Cooper pairs with different critical temperatures. It incorporates pressure-dependent pairing gaps derived from effective chiral field theory and constructs empirical temperature scalings for the gaps and mean-fields that balance condensation and magnetic energies. Superfluid entrainment is shown to enlarge the neutron vortex core while shrinking the effective magnetic penetration depth. This result matters because it determines whether thin-line approximations can be used when calculating angular momentum transport and magnetic evolution inside neutron stars.

Core claim

When the mean-field theory is extended to unequal critical temperatures T_cp and T_cn, the superfluid entrainment increases the neutron vortex core radius above the magnetic penetration depth at all pressures in the outer core, so that the London thin-line approximation for the neutron vortex fails everywhere in that region.

What carries the argument

Extended mean-field theory for coupled superfluid-superconducting vortices that incorporates entrainment, pressure-dependent gaps from chiral effective field theory, and an empirical temperature-dependent mean-field balancing condensation and magnetic energies.

If this is right

  • The London approximation remains usable for proton vortices only near the crust-core transition density.
  • The theory supplies the microscopic structure needed to compute angular momentum per vortex, magnetization, and vortex-fluxtube interaction energy.
  • Entrainment reduces the effective penetration depth while enlarging the neutron core, altering the relative scales that govern vortex pinning and motion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Models of pulsar glitches that rely on thin neutron vortices may need revision because the enlarged cores change the pinning volume and mutual friction coefficients.
  • The pressure dependence of the gaps implies that the core-to-penetration-depth ratio varies with depth, potentially creating a layered vortex lattice structure inside the star.
  • The same entrainment mechanism could affect the stability of fluxtube lattices against proton-neutron drag forces at higher densities.

Load-bearing premise

The thermodynamic magnetic field is assumed to vary quadratically with scaled temperature T over T_cp in analogy with pure superconductors.

What would settle it

A microscopic calculation or measurement showing whether the neutron vortex core radius is smaller than the London penetration depth at a representative outer-core density such as twice nuclear saturation density and a temperature below both critical temperatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11216 by Dmitry Kobyakov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Critical temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. The dimensionless coefficients [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Characteristic lengths associated with the superfluid vortex [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Purpose: Characterize superfluid-superconducting vortex states at arbitrary pressures with $T_{cp}\neq T_{cn}$, assuming both proton and neutron mean-fields are formed by spin-0 Cooper pairs. Method: The existing mean-field theory is extended to account for $T_{cp}\neq T_{cn}$. The pressure dependence of the pairing gap energy $\Delta_{\alpha0}$ is quantitatively established on the basis of the effective chiral field theory. To link $T_{c\alpha}$ with $\Delta_{\alpha0}$, I use the weak-coupling result $T_{c\alpha}\approx0.57\Delta_{\alpha0}$. A quadratic scaled-temperature ($T/T_{cp}$) dependence of the thermodynamic magnetic field is postulated in analogy with pure superconductors. The $T/T_{c\alpha}$-dependence of the gap $\Delta_{\alpha T}$ is inferred from the many-body approximations for the pure neutron matter. Results: An empirical $T/T_{c\alpha}$-dependence for the mean-field is constructed to account for the interplay between the condensation and the magnetic energies. The superfluid entrainment is found to increase the size of the vortex core and to decrease the effective magnetic penetration depth. The size of the neutron vortex core is found to be larger than the magnetic penetration depth in the outer core. Conclusions: The usual approximation of infinitely thin vortex line (the London's approximation) for the neutron vortex is found to be irrelevant in the entire outer core and for the proton vortex is found to be limited to vicinity of the crust-core transition. The developed mean-field theory paves the way to study the vortex microscopic structure, the angular momentum, the magnetization and the vortex-fluxtube interaction energy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends an existing mean-field theory for superfluid-superconducting vortex states in the outer core of neutron stars to handle unequal critical temperatures T_cp ≠ T_cn for protons and neutrons. It determines the pressure dependence of pairing gaps Δ_α0 via effective chiral field theory, links T_cα to Δ_α0 using the weak-coupling relation T_cα ≈ 0.57 Δ_α0, postulates a quadratic T/T_cp dependence for the thermodynamic magnetic field by analogy with pure superconductors, infers gap temperature dependences from pure-neutron many-body calculations, and constructs an empirical T/T_cα dependence for the mean field to balance condensation and magnetic energies. The central results are that entrainment enlarges the neutron vortex core while reducing the effective magnetic penetration depth, such that the neutron vortex core exceeds the penetration depth throughout the outer core (rendering the London approximation irrelevant for neutron vortices and limited for proton vortices near the crust-core transition).

Significance. If the temperature dependences can be placed on a self-consistent footing, the work supplies a useful framework for vortex structure, angular momentum, magnetization, and fluxtube interactions in neutron-star cores. The incorporation of chiral effective theory for gap pressure dependence and the explicit treatment of entrainment are constructive steps. However, the quantitative claims on core-size ratios rest on postulated and constructed temperature dependences rather than direct solution of the extended coupled equations, limiting the robustness of the reported findings.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (temperature dependences)] In the Methods section describing temperature dependences: the quadratic scaled-temperature (T/T_cp) dependence of the thermodynamic magnetic field is postulated by analogy with pure superconductors. Because the paper's central extension is precisely to the mixed case with T_cp ≠ T_cn and entrainment, this assumption must be derived from the coupled gap and vector-potential equations to support the core-size and penetration-depth ratios.
  2. [Results (mean-field construction)] In the Results section on mean-field construction: an empirical T/T_cα dependence for the mean field is assembled to incorporate condensation-magnetic energy interplay rather than obtained by solving the extended mean-field equations. This construction is load-bearing for the claim that the neutron vortex core exceeds the magnetic penetration depth throughout the outer core.
  3. [Conclusions] In the Conclusions: the statements that London's approximation is irrelevant for neutron vortices in the entire outer core and limited for proton vortices near the crust-core transition rest on the above temperature dependences. No direct validation against microscopic calculations, error estimates, or recovery of known limits (e.g., T → 0 or equal T_c) is provided.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces the notation T_cα without immediate clarification of the index α; a brief parenthetical definition would improve readability.
  2. [Methods] The pressure dependence of Δ_α0 is stated to be 'quantitatively established' from chiral effective field theory; explicit functional forms or references to the specific parametrization used would aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We respond point by point to the major comments, clarifying the methodological choices while acknowledging their approximate character. Revisions have been made to improve transparency and add caveats without altering the core framework.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: In the Methods section describing temperature dependences: the quadratic scaled-temperature (T/T_cp) dependence of the thermodynamic magnetic field is postulated by analogy with pure superconductors. Because the paper's central extension is precisely to the mixed case with T_cp ≠ T_cn and entrainment, this assumption must be derived from the coupled gap and vector-potential equations to support the core-size and penetration-depth ratios.

    Authors: We agree that a direct derivation from the coupled equations in the mixed case would be preferable. However, obtaining such a dependence requires a full numerical solution of the extended mean-field equations with entrainment and unequal critical temperatures, which involves substantial computational complexity beyond the scope of this work. The quadratic form is adopted from established pure-superconductor results as a controlled approximation that recovers the correct T=0 and T=T_cp limits. We have revised the Methods section to state this explicitly, discuss the approximation's domain of validity, and note the desirability of future self-consistent calculations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: In the Results section on mean-field construction: an empirical T/T_cα dependence for the mean field is assembled to incorporate condensation-magnetic energy interplay rather than obtained by solving the extended mean-field equations. This construction is load-bearing for the claim that the neutron vortex core exceeds the magnetic penetration depth throughout the outer core.

    Authors: The empirical construction is introduced precisely to capture the energy balance between condensation and magnetic contributions in a manner consistent with known limiting behaviors. We recognize that it is not obtained from direct solution of the coupled equations. In the revised manuscript we have expanded the Results section with additional justification based on energy minimization arguments, included a sensitivity analysis to the functional form, and inserted explicit caveats that the quantitative core-size ratios rest on this approximation. revision: partial

  3. Referee: In the Conclusions: the statements that London's approximation is irrelevant for neutron vortices in the entire outer core and limited for proton vortices near the crust-core transition rest on the above temperature dependences. No direct validation against microscopic calculations, error estimates, or recovery of known limits (e.g., T → 0 or equal T_c) is provided.

    Authors: We have updated the Conclusions to acknowledge the dependence on the adopted temperature scalings, to demonstrate recovery of the T→0 limit (where gaps approach their zero-temperature values) and the equal-T_c consistency check, and to supply a brief parameter-sensitivity discussion as an error estimate. Direct comparison with microscopic calculations is not performed here, as the focus is on the mean-field framework; we have added this as an explicit direction for future work. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full self-consistent numerical derivation of the temperature dependences directly from the coupled gap and vector-potential equations for the mixed T_cp ≠ T_cn case with entrainment.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper explicitly states that a quadratic T/T_cp dependence of the thermodynamic magnetic field is postulated by analogy with pure superconductors, the gap T/T_cα dependence is inferred from many-body calculations on pure neutron matter, and an empirical T/T_cα dependence for the mean-field is constructed to incorporate condensation-magnetic energy balance. These are presented as inputs to the extended mean-field theory rather than outputs derived from its coupled gap and vector-potential equations. The reported findings on neutron vortex core size exceeding magnetic penetration depth, and the irrelevance of London's approximation, follow from applying the theory with these stated assumptions. No self-definitional loops, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce claims to tautologies are present in the provided text. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained with transparent external inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on three external inputs whose validity is not re-derived: the weak-coupling relation T_cα ≈ 0.57 Δ_α0, the pressure dependence of Δ_α0 taken from effective chiral field theory, and the many-body approximations for the gap temperature dependence in pure neutron matter. No new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • quadratic coefficient for thermodynamic magnetic field
    Postulated T/T_cp dependence chosen by analogy with pure superconductors; no independent derivation inside the model.
  • empirical mean-field temperature dependence
    Constructed ad hoc to account for interplay between condensation and magnetic energies.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Both proton and neutron mean-fields are formed by spin-0 Cooper pairs
    Stated in the purpose section; used to justify the mean-field framework.
  • domain assumption Weak-coupling result T_cα ≈ 0.57 Δ_α0 holds at all pressures
    Invoked to link critical temperature to gap energy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5619 in / 1672 out tokens · 31833 ms · 2026-05-13T01:05:20.293098+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 37 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G. Baym, C. Pethick and D. Pines, Nature (Lon- don),224, 673 (1969). Superfluidity in Neutron Stars. https://doi.org/10.1038/224673a0

    work page doi:10.1038/224673a0 1969

  2. [2]

    Drischler, T

    C. Drischler, T. Kr ¨uger, K. Hebeler, and A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. C95, 024302 (2017). Pairing in neutron mat- ter: New uncertainty estimates and three-body forces. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.95.024302

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.95.024302 2017

  3. [3]

    Lim and J

    Y . Lim and J. W. Holt, Phys. Rev. C103, 025807 (2021). Proton Pairing in Neutron Stars from Chiral Effective Field Theory. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.103.025807

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.025807 2021

  4. [4]

    P. W. Anderson, Rev. Mod. Phys.38, 298 (1966). Considerations on the Flow of Superfluid Helium. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.38.298

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.38.298 1966

  5. [5]

    Varoquaux, Rev

    E. Varoquaux, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 803 (2015). Anderson’s considerations on the flow of superfluid helium: Some off- shoots. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.87.803

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.803 2015

  6. [6]

    M. A. Alpar, S. A. Langer, J. A. Sauls, Astrophys. J.282, 533 (1984). Rapid Postglitch Spin-up of the Superfluid Core in Pul- sars. https://doi.org/10.1086/162232

    work page doi:10.1086/162232 1984

  7. [7]

    Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity, (2ed., MGH, 10 1996)

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity, (2ed., MGH, 10 1996)

    work page 1996

  8. [8]

    Peißker, M

    Ø. Elgarøy and F. V . De Blasio, A&A370, 939 (2001). Su- perfluid vortices in neutron stars. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004- 6361:20010160

    work page doi:10.1051/0004- 2001

  9. [9]

    D. N. Kobyakov, Phys. Rev. C98, 045803 (2018). Application of Superconducting-superfluid Magneto- hydrodynamics to Nuclear “Pasta” in Neutron Stars. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.98.045803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.98.045803 2018

  10. [10]

    D. N. Kobyakov and C. J. Pethick, Sov. Phys. JETP127, 851 (2018). Superfluid Liquid Crystals: Pasta Phases in Neutron Star Crusts. https://doi.org/10.1134/s1063776118110067

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063776118110067 2018

  11. [11]

    C. J. Pethick, Z.-W. Zhang, D. N. Kobyakov, Phys. Rev. C101, 055802 (2020). Elastic Properties of Phases with Nonspherical Nuclei in Dense Matter. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.101.055802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.101.055802 2020

  12. [12]

    Zhang and C

    Z.-W. Zhang and C. J. Pethick, Phys. Rev. C103, 055807 (2021). Proton Superconductivity in Pasta Phases in Neutron Star Crusts. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.103.055807

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.103.055807 2021

  13. [13]

    D. N. Kobyakov, Phys. Rev. C102, 045803 (2020). Surface Energy of Magnetized Superconducting Matter in Neutron Star Cores. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.102.045803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.102.045803 2020

  14. [14]

    Haber and A

    A. Haber and A. Schmitt, Phys. Rev. D95, 116016 (2017). Crit- ical magnetic fields in a superconductor coupled to a superfluid. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.116016

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.116016 2017

  15. [15]

    Link, Phys

    B. Link, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 101101 (2003). Constrain- ing Hadronic Superfluidity with Neutron Star Precession. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.91.101101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.91.101101 2003

  16. [16]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

    K. Glampedakis, N. Andersson and L. Samuelsson, MNRAS410, 805 (2011). Magnetohydrodynamics of superfluid and superconducting neutron star cores. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17484.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17484.x 2011

  17. [17]

    T. S. Wood and V . Graber, Universe8, 228 (2022). Superconducting Phases in Neutron Star Cores. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe8040228

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8040228 2022

  18. [18]

    Shukla, M

    S. Shukla, M. E. Brachet and R. Pandit, Phys. Rev. D110, 083002 (2024) Neutron-superfluid vor- tices and proton-superconductor flux tubes: De- velopment of a minimal model for pulsar glitches. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.083002 2024

  19. [19]

    J. A. Gil Granados, A. Mu˜noz Mateo and X. Vi˜nas, Phys. Rev. C 111, 065802 (2025). Half-vortex states in the rotating outer core of neutron stars. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.111.065802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.111.065802 2025

  20. [20]

    Marmorini, S

    G. Marmorini, S. Yasui and M. Nitta, Sci. Rep.14, 7857 (2024). Pulsar glitches from quantum vortex networks. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-56383-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-024-56383-w 2024

  21. [21]

    Tajima, H

    H. Tajima, H. Funaki, Y . Sekino, N. Yasutake, and M. Matsuo, Phys. Rev. C108, L052802 (2023). Explor- ing 3P2 superfluid in dilute spin-polarized neutron matter. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L052802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.l052802 2023

  22. [22]

    Yasui, C

    S. Yasui, C. Chatterjee, M. Kobayashi and M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. C100, 025204 (2019). Reexamining Ginzburg- Landau theory for neutron 3P2 superfluidity in neutron stars. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.025204

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.025204 2019

  23. [23]

    Mizushima, S

    T. Mizushima, S. Yasui, D. Inotani and M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. C 104, 045803 (2021) Spin-polarized phases of 3P2 superfluids in neutron stars. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104.045803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.104.045803 2021

  24. [24]

    Kobayashi and M

    M. Kobayashi and M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. C105, 035807 (2022) Core structures of vortices in Ginzburg-Landau theory for neutron 3P2 superfluids. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.035807

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.105.035807 2022

  25. [25]

    Kobayashi and M

    M. Kobayashi and M. Nitta, Phys. Rev. C107, 045801 (2023) Proximity effects of vortices in neutron 3P2 superfluids in neu- tron stars: V ortex core transitions and covalent bonding of vor- tex molecules. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.045801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.107.045801 2023

  26. [26]

    Adhikari et al., Progr

    P. Adhikari et al., Progr. Part. Nucl. Phys.146, 104199 (2026). Strongly interacting matter in extreme magnetic fields. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ppnp.2025.104199

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2025.104199 2026

  27. [27]

    Hattori and K

    T. Hattori and K. Sekizawa, arXiv:2512.22577v1 (2025). Ex- ploring Interplays Between 3P2 Neutron Superfluid V ortices and 1S0 Proton Fluxtubes in the Outer Core of Neutron Stars. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2512.22577

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.22577 2025

  28. [28]

    F. V . De Blasio and Ø. Elgarøy, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1815 (1999). Microscopic Structure of a V ortex Line in Superfluid Neutron Star Matter. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.1815

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1815 1999

  29. [29]

    D. N. Kobyakov and C. J. Pethick, Astrophys. J.836, 203 (2017). Two-Component Superfluid Hydrodynamics of Neu- tron Star Cores. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/203

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/203 2017

  30. [30]

    D. N. Kobyakov, C. J. Pethick, S. Reddy, A. Schwenk, Phys. Rev. C96, 025805 (2017). Dispersion and Decay of Collective Modes in Neutron Star Cores. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevc.96.025805

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.96.025805 2017

  31. [31]

    Yu and A

    Y . Yu and A. Bulgac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 161101 (2003). Spatial Structure of a V ortex in Low Density Neutron Matter. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.161101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.90.161101 2003

  32. [32]

    Y . Tang, W. Guo, H. Kobayashi, S. Yui, M. Tsubota and T. Kanai, Nat. Comm.14, 2941 (2023). Imaging quantized vor- tex rings in superfluid helium to evaluate quantum dissipation. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38787-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-023-38787-w 2023

  33. [33]

    D. N. Kobyakov, Phys. Rev. C108, L062801 (2023). Screening condition in the core of neutron stars. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.L062801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.l062801 2023

  34. [34]

    Mendell, ApJ380, 515 (1991)

    G. Mendell, ApJ380, 515 (1991). Superfluid hydrodynam- ics in rotating neutron stars. I - Nondissipative equations. https://doi.org/10.1086/170609

    work page doi:10.1086/170609 1991

  35. [35]

    Andersson and G

    N. Andersson and G. L. Comer, Class. Quantum Grav.23, 5505 (2006). A flux-conservative formalism for convective and dissipative multi-fluid systems, with application to New- tonian superfluid neutron stars. https://doi.org/10.1088/0264- 9381/23/18/003

    work page doi:10.1088/0264- 2006

  36. [36]

    Andersson, Universe7, 17 (2021)

    N. Andersson, Universe7, 17 (2021). A Su- perfluid Perspective on Neutron Star Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7010017

    work page doi:10.3390/universe7010017 2021

  37. [37]

    Drissi and A

    M. Drissi and A. Rios, Eur. Phys. J. A58, 90 (2022). Many-body approximations to the superfluid gap and critical temperature in pure neutron matter. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00738-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00738-2 2022