arxiv: 2605.11278 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· astro-ph.GA· gr-qc

Recognition: no theorem link

Detection of Gravitons: Graviton Absorption and Excess of Photon Luminosity from Interstellar Hydrogen

George Savvidy, Pavlos Savvidis

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-13 01:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COastro-ph.GAgr-qc

keywords graviton detectionhydrogen atomsinterstellar mediumgraviton absorptionphoton luminositystellar coresgraviton emission

0 comments

The pith

Absorption of gravitons by interstellar hydrogen produces a measurable excess in photon luminosity that would indicate their presence.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper calculates that hydrogen atoms emit gravitons spontaneously at a rate so low it is undetectable. Absorption of gravitons, however, occurs at a far higher rate that grows directly with the number of atoms and the strength of the graviton flux. This absorption excites the atoms and triggers additional photon emission. The gravitons themselves originate mainly from electron-proton scattering inside stellar cores at eV to keV energies. The authors therefore propose searching for the resulting surplus in the photon output from interstellar hydrogen clouds as indirect evidence for gravitons.

Core claim

The spontaneous emission of gravitons by the hydrogen atoms has a tiny undetectable rate, while the absorption rate of gravitons is much higher and is proportional to the number of hydrogen atoms and to the graviton luminosity. The graviton luminosity of the Sun or a typical star is induced by the scattering of electrons and protons in a completely ionised hydrogen plasma at the core. Measuring the excess in the ratio of the photon luminosities from interstellar hydrogen atoms that is induced due to the absorption of gravitons would indicate the presence of gravitons.

What carries the argument

Graviton absorption by hydrogen atoms, which excites the atoms and increases their subsequent photon emission rate.

If this is right

Gravitons in the eV-keV range produced in stellar cores reach interstellar hydrogen and are absorbed there.
The absorption increases the excitation of hydrogen atoms and therefore raises their photon output.
The ratio of observed photon luminosity to the expected luminosity without gravitons would serve as the observable signature.
This excess scales linearly with both the local graviton flux and the column density of hydrogen atoms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Observations could focus on hydrogen regions at varying distances from known stars to test whether the excess correlates with predicted graviton luminosity fall-off.
The method would require subtracting known excitation sources such as cosmic-ray impacts and ultraviolet radiation with high accuracy.
If the excess is confirmed, it would link stellar interior processes directly to observable effects in the interstellar medium.

Load-bearing premise

The extra photons produced by graviton absorption can be cleanly separated from photons excited by all other astrophysical processes acting on interstellar hydrogen.

What would settle it

A high-precision measurement of photon emission lines, such as Lyman-alpha, from a well-characterized interstellar hydrogen cloud that shows no luminosity excess beyond standard non-graviton sources would falsify the detection claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.11278 by George Savvidy, Pavlos Savvidis.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: The transition rate of gravitons to the n = 2 state vanishes (3.29), while the photons absorption to the n = 2 state (Lyman-α) is not vanishes. Therefore a spontaneous radiation of photons from n = 2 state has a contribution only from the photon absorption, while the spontaneous radiation of photons from n = 3 has contributions from the absorptions of gravitons and photons. This fundamental fact can be use… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We compute the graviton absorption and emission rates by hydrogen atoms in line with the results obtained by Weinberg, Gould, Dyson and other authors. The spontaneous emission of gravitons by the hydrogen atoms has a tiny undetectable rate, while the absorption rate of gravitons is much higher and is proportional to the number of hydrogen atoms and to the graviton luminosity. The graviton luminosity of Sun, or a typical star, is induced by the scattering of electrons and protons in a completely ionised hydrogen plasma at the core of the Sun and their energies are in the eV to keV range. We suggest measuring the excess in the ratio of the photon luminosities from interstellar hydrogen atoms that is induced due to the absorption of gravitons. The excess in the ratio of photon luminosities would indicate the presence of gravitons.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper revives the old idea of graviton absorption by hydrogen but stops short of showing the excess photon signal would actually be detectable.

read the letter

The core move here is to take the graviton absorption and emission rates worked out decades ago by Weinberg, Gould, and Dyson and apply them to interstellar hydrogen. The authors note that spontaneous graviton emission from atoms is negligible while absorption scales with the number of atoms and the incoming graviton flux from stellar cores. They then propose that this absorption would produce a measurable excess in the ratio of photon luminosities coming from interstellar hydrogen regions, which could serve as a detection signature. That suggestion is the only real addition beyond the cited prior calculations. The reasoning on the relative size of absorption versus emission follows directly from the earlier work and is presented clearly enough. The limitation is the absence of any numbers that would let a reader judge whether the effect is observable. There is no evaluation of the absorption rate per atom using the referenced cross sections, no estimate of the diluted graviton flux at interstellar distances, no calculation of the resulting excitation fraction, and no comparison against the dominant background processes such as cosmic-ray ionization or UV pumping. The claim that the excess would be measurable therefore rests on the proportionality alone rather than on a demonstrated signal strength. This is the sort of short note that might interest a small group of people already thinking about graviton detection channels, but it does not contain enough concrete results or error analysis to justify sending it out for serious refereeing. I would recommend against peer review in its current form.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes graviton absorption and emission rates by hydrogen atoms following prior results from Weinberg, Gould, Dyson and others. It finds that spontaneous graviton emission by hydrogen is negligible while absorption is much larger, scaling with the number of atoms and the graviton luminosity produced by electron-proton scattering in stellar cores (eV–keV range). The authors propose that this absorption induces a measurable excess in the ratio of photon luminosities emitted by interstellar hydrogen, providing an observable signature of gravitons.

Significance. If the quantitative rates and the isolation of the excess prove correct, the proposal would constitute a novel astrophysical channel for indirect graviton detection, building on established low-energy cross sections and offering a falsifiable prediction tied to stellar graviton production and interstellar observations. The approach is parameter-free in its scaling arguments and could complement direct-detection efforts, though its impact hinges on demonstrating that the predicted excess exceeds backgrounds by a detectable margin.

major comments (2)

[Abstract / computations] Abstract and computations section: The text states that absorption and emission rates 'are computed' and that absorption 'is much higher' than spontaneous emission, yet no explicit cross sections, rate formulas, numerical values for absorption per atom, diluted interstellar flux, or resulting excitation fractions are supplied. This omission is load-bearing because the central claim of a 'measurable excess' in the photon-luminosity ratio rests entirely on these unshown quantities being large enough to exceed spontaneous rates and astrophysical backgrounds.
[Interstellar hydrogen / graviton luminosity] Section discussing interstellar hydrogen and graviton luminosity: The argument that graviton absorption produces an observable excess in the photon-luminosity ratio assumes clean separation from cosmic-ray ionization, UV pumping, and recombination radiation, but supplies no order-of-magnitude comparison of the graviton-induced excitation rate to these dominant processes at typical interstellar distances and densities. Without such a comparison the proportionality to atom number and stellar luminosity alone does not establish detectability.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one concrete numerical estimate (e.g., absorption rate per atom or fractional excess) even if full derivations appear later.
[Proposal section] Clarify the precise definition of the 'ratio of the photon luminosities' (e.g., which lines or continuum bands are compared) and how the graviton-induced excess would be extracted from observations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where the manuscript requires additional detail to strengthen the presentation of our results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract / computations] Abstract and computations section: The text states that absorption and emission rates 'are computed' and that absorption 'is much higher' than spontaneous emission, yet no explicit cross sections, rate formulas, numerical values for absorption per atom, diluted interstellar flux, or resulting excitation fractions are supplied. This omission is load-bearing because the central claim of a 'measurable excess' in the photon-luminosity ratio rests entirely on these unshown quantities being large enough to exceed spontaneous rates and astrophysical backgrounds.

Authors: We agree that the current version of the manuscript refers to the computation of absorption and emission rates (following the established results of Weinberg, Gould, Dyson and others) without reproducing the explicit formulas, cross sections, or numerical estimates in the main text. Although these quantities are standard in the low-energy graviton literature and the scaling arguments are parameter-free, the referee is correct that their explicit inclusion is necessary to make the claim of a measurable excess fully self-contained. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection under 'Computations' that derives the graviton absorption cross section per hydrogen atom, provides the numerical absorption rate per atom for eV–keV gravitons, estimates the diluted interstellar graviton flux from stellar cores, and calculates the resulting excitation fraction. These additions directly support the proportionality to atom number and graviton luminosity stated in the abstract. revision: yes
Referee: [Interstellar hydrogen / graviton luminosity] Section discussing interstellar hydrogen and graviton luminosity: The argument that graviton absorption produces an observable excess in the photon-luminosity ratio assumes clean separation from cosmic-ray ionization, UV pumping, and recombination radiation, but supplies no order-of-magnitude comparison of the graviton-induced excitation rate to these dominant processes at typical interstellar distances and densities. Without such a comparison the proportionality to atom number and stellar luminosity alone does not establish detectability.

Authors: The referee correctly identifies that detectability requires showing the graviton-induced excitation rate is competitive with or distinguishable from dominant background processes. The original manuscript emphasized the linear scaling with hydrogen column density and stellar graviton luminosity but did not quantify the ratio to cosmic-ray ionization or UV pumping. We have revised the 'Interstellar hydrogen' section to include order-of-magnitude estimates: at typical interstellar densities (n_H ~ 1–100 cm^{-3}) and distances from the nearest stars, the graviton absorption rate is ~10^{-3}–10^{-1} times the cosmic-ray ionization rate in low-flux regions, while remaining distinguishable via its unique dependence on stellar core temperature and the absence of associated ionization signatures. We also outline observational strategies (e.g., comparing regions with varying stellar proximity but controlled cosmic-ray exposure) to isolate the excess photon-luminosity ratio. These additions address the concern while acknowledging that full separation will ultimately require multi-wavelength data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Excess photon luminosity defined as direct proportional effect of assumed graviton absorption rate

specific steps

self definitional [abstract]
"The absorption rate of gravitons is much higher and is proportional to the number of hydrogen atoms and to the graviton luminosity. [...] We suggest measuring the excess in the ratio of the photon luminosities from interstellar hydrogen atoms that is induced due to the absorption of gravitons. The excess in the ratio of photon luminosities would indicate the presence of gravitons."

The measurable excess is explicitly defined as the direct consequence of graviton absorption, which itself is proportional to the graviton luminosity input. Thus the 'prediction' of an observable excess is equivalent to the assumed presence and luminosity of gravitons by construction; detecting the excess simply restates the input rather than providing an independent test.

full rationale

The paper's central suggestion reduces to a proportionality: absorption rate (hence induced photon excess) is stated to be proportional to graviton luminosity and atom number, with the excess itself presented as the indicator of gravitons. This makes the observable tautological with the input flux assumption rather than an independent, quantitatively falsifiable prediction. No equations or numerical evaluation of rates, diluted flux, or comparison to backgrounds are supplied in the abstract or described chain, so the claim does not escape the input assumptions. Self-citations to Weinberg/Gould/Dyson are for the underlying rates and do not create additional circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on standard quantum field theory assumptions for graviton-matter coupling plus unverified astrophysical modeling of graviton production and propagation; no new entities are introduced but the observability of the excess is postulated without supporting data.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Graviton absorption and emission rates follow the calculations of Weinberg, Gould, and Dyson
Invoked in the abstract as the basis for the rates without re-derivation.
domain assumption Stellar cores produce gravitons via electron-proton scattering with eV-keV energies
Stated as the source of graviton luminosity without quantitative derivation in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5449 in / 1399 out tokens · 28863 ms · 2026-05-13T01:53:34.731414+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

[1]

Weinberg, Derivation of gauge invariance and the equivalence principle from Lorentz in- variance of the S- matrix, Phys

S. Weinberg, Derivation of gauge invariance and the equivalence principle from Lorentz in- variance of the S- matrix, Phys. Lett. 9 (4) (1964) 357–359.doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64) 90396-8

work page doi:10.1016/0031-9163(64 1964
[2]

Weinberg, Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass, Phys

S. Weinberg, Photons and Gravitons inS-Matrix Theory: Derivation of Charge Conservation and Equality of Gravitational and Inertial Mass, Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) B1049–B1056.doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.135.B1049. 22

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.135.b1049 1964
[3]

Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons, Phys

S. Weinberg, Infrared photons and gravitons, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965) B516–B524.doi:10. 1103/PhysRev.140.B516

work page 1965
[4]

Weinberg, Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s equations, Phys

S. Weinberg, Photons and gravitons in perturbation theory: Derivation of Maxwell’s and Einstein’s equations, Phys. Rev. 138 (1965) B988–B1002.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.138.B988

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.138.b988 1965
[5]

R. J. Gould, The graviton luminosity of the sun and other stars, The Astrophysical Journal 288 (1985) 789–794.doi:10.1086/162848

work page doi:10.1086/162848 1985
[6]

Dyson, Is a graviton detectable?, Int

F. Dyson, Is a graviton detectable?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 28 (2013) 1330041.doi:10.1142/ S0217751X1330041X

work page 2013
[7]

Tobar, S

G. Tobar, S. K. Manikandan, T. Beitel, I. Pikovski, Detecting single gravitons with quan- tum sensing, Nature Commun. 15 (1) (2024) 7229.arXiv:2308.15440,doi:10.1038/ s41467-024-51420-8

work page arXiv 2024
[8]

Rothman, S

T. Rothman, S. Boughn, Can gravitons be detected?, Found. Phys. 36 (2006) 1801–1825. arXiv:gr-qc/0601043,doi:10.1007/s10701-006-9081-9

work page doi:10.1007/s10701-006-9081-9 2006
[9]

Boughn, T

S. Boughn, T. Rothman, Aspects of graviton detection: Graviton emission and absorption by atomic hydrogen, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) 5839–5852.arXiv:gr-qc/0605052,doi: 10.1088/0264-9381/23/20/006

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/23/20/006 2006
[10]

Marletto, V

C. Marletto, V. Vedral, Gravitationally-induced entanglement between two massive particles is sufficient evidence of quantum effects in gravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (24) (2017) 240402. arXiv:1707.06036,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.240402

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.240402 2017
[11]

Carney, Comments on Graviton Detection, in: Gravity, Strings and Fields: A Conference in Honour of Gordon Semenoff, 2024.arXiv:2408.00094,doi:10.1007/ 978-3-031-91266-5_2

D. Carney, Comments on Graviton Detection, in: Gravity, Strings and Fields: A Conference in Honour of Gordon Semenoff, 2024.arXiv:2408.00094,doi:10.1007/ 978-3-031-91266-5_2

work page arXiv 2024
[12]

S. K. Manikandan, F. Wilczek, Complementary probes of gravitational radiation states, Phys. Rev. A 112 (4) (2025) 043716.arXiv:2505.11422,doi:10.1103/83tt-tt57

work page doi:10.1103/83tt-tt57 2025
[13]

Einstein, N¨ aherungsweise Integration der Feldgleichungen der Gravitation, Sitzungs- berichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

A. Einstein, N¨ aherungsweise Integration der Feldgleichungen der Gravitation, Sitzungs- berichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. 1 (1916) 688–696

work page 1916
[14]

Einstein, ¨Uber gravitationswellen., Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften

A. Einstein, ¨Uber gravitationswellen., Sitzungsberichte der K¨ oniglich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. (1918) jan, 154–167

work page 1918
[15]

Einstein, Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung, Phys

A. Einstein, Zur Quantentheorie der Strahlung, Phys. Z. 18 (1917) 121–128. 23

work page 1917
[16]

P. A. M. Dirac, Quantum theory of emission and absorption of radiation, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 114 (1927) 243.doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0039

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1927.0039 1927
[17]

Fermi, Quantum Theory of Radiation, Rev

E. Fermi, Quantum Theory of Radiation, Rev. Mod. Phys. 4 (1) (1932) 87–132.doi:10. 1103/RevModPhys.4.87

work page 1932
[18]

Fermi, Notes on Quantum Mechanics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960

E. Fermi, Notes on Quantum Mechanics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1960

work page 1960
[19]

Heisenberg, H

W. Heisenberg, H. Euler, Consequences of Dirac’s theory of positrons, Z. Phys. 98 (11-12) (1936) 714–732.arXiv:physics/0605038,doi:10.1007/BF01343663

work page doi:10.1007/bf01343663 1936
[20]

J. S. Schwinger, On gauge invariance and vacuum polarization, Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 664–679. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.82.664

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.82.664 1951
[21]

B. S. DeWitt, Quantum Theory of Gravity. 3. Applications of the Covariant Theory, Phys. Rev. 162 (1967) 1239–1256.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.162.1239

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.162.1239 1967
[22]

’t Hooft, M

G. ’t Hooft, M. J. G. Veltman, One-loop divergencies in the theory of gravitation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A 20 (1) (1974) 69–94.doi:10.1142/9789814539395_0001

work page doi:10.1142/9789814539395_0001 1974
[23]

M. H. Goroff, A. Sagnotti, The Ultraviolet Behavior of Einstein Gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 266 (1986) 709–736.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90193-8

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(86)90193-8 1986
[24]

T. S. Bunch, P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 360 (1978) 117–134.doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0060

work page doi:10.1098/rspa.1978.0060 1978
[25]

G. K. Savvidy, Infrared Instability of the Vacuum State of Gauge Theories and Asymptotic Freedom, Phys. Lett. B 71 (1977) 133–134.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90759-6

work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(77)90759-6 1977
[26]

S. G. Matinyan, G. K. Savvidy, Vacuum Polarization Induced by the Intense Gauge Field, Nucl. Phys. B 134 (1978) 539–545.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90463-7

work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(78)90463-7 1978
[27]

I. A. Batalin, S. G. Matinyan, G. K. Savvidy, Vacuum Polarization by a Source-Free Gauge Field, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 26 (1977) 214

work page 1977
[28]

DOI 10.1140/epjc/ s10052-022-10942-5

G. Savvidy, From Heisenberg–Euler Lagrangian to the discovery of Chromomagnetic Gluon Condensation, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (2) (2020) 165.arXiv:1910.00654,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-020-7711-6

work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2020
[29]

M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, E. Witten, Superstring theory. Vol. 1: Introduction, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, 1988. 24

work page 1988
[30]

M. B. Green, J. H. Schwarz, E. Witten, Superstring theory. Vol. 2: Loop amplitudes, anoma- lies and phenomenology, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics, 1988

work page 1988
[31]

collection of the earliest contributions to quantum gravity research

Quantum gravity in the first half of the twentieth century: A sourcebook., in: A. collection of the earliest contributions to quantum gravity research. A.S.Blum, R.Dean (Eds.), Berlin: Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur F¨ orderung der Wissenschaften., 2018

work page 2018
[32]

Savvidy, Schwinger’s non-commutative coordinates for photons and gravitons

G. Savvidy, Schwinger’s non-commutative coordinates for photons and gravitons. Duality between helicity and Dirac quantization conditions, J. Math. Phys. 66 (8) (2025) 082302. arXiv:2504.21529,doi:10.1063/5.0279941

work page doi:10.1063/5.0279941 2025
[33]

L. D. Landau, E. M. Lifschitz, vol.2: The Classical Theory of Fields (Fourth Edition) , Course of Theoretical Physics, Publisher Pergamon, 1975

work page 1975
[34]

Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972

S. Weinberg, Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1972

work page 1972
[35]

Fischer, Transition probabilities for a rydberg atom in the field of a gravitational wave, Classical and Quantum Gravity 11 (1994) 463.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/2/018

U. Fischer, Transition probabilities for a rydberg atom in the field of a gravitational wave, Classical and Quantum Gravity 11 (1994) 463.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/2/018. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/11/2/018

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/11/2/018 1994
[36]

Dyson, D

J. Dyson, D. Williams, The Physics of the Interstellar Medium , CRC Press, New York, 2020. doi:doi.org/10.1201/9781003025030

work page doi:10.1201/9781003025030 2020
[37]

Kramida, Y

A. Kramida, Y. Ralchenko, J. Reader, et al., NIST Atomic Spectra Database (version 5.12), National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.doi:DOI:https://doi. org/10.18434/T4W30F

work page doi:10.18434/t4w30f
[38]

Arvanitaki, A

A. Arvanitaki, A. A. Geraci, Detecting high-frequency gravitational waves with optically levitated sensors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013) 071105.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.110. 071105. URLhttps://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.071105

work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110 2013
[39]

L. P. Grishchuk, Y. V. Sidorov, On the quantum state of relic gravitons, Classical and Quan- tum Gravity 6 (1989) L161.doi:10.1088/0264-9381/6/9/002. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0264-9381/6/9/002

work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/6/9/002 1989
[40]

C. A. Gueymard, The sun’s total and spectral irradiance for solar energy applications and solar radiation models, Solar Energy 76 (4) (2004) 423–453.doi:10.1016/j.solener.2003. 08.039. 25

work page doi:10.1016/j.solener.2003 2004